101. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia should not be confused with Kimura’s disease
- Author
-
Stefan Seregard
- Subjects
Pathology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,SUBCUTANEOUS MASS ,Eye Diseases ,business.industry ,Angiolymphoid Hyperplasia with Eosinophilia ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Diagnosis, Differential ,Ophthalmology ,medicine ,Humans ,Periocular Region ,Kimura's disease ,Female ,Eyebrows ,Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia ,business - Abstract
Purpose: To emphasize the differences between angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia (ALHE) and Kimura’s disease (KD), two entities often confused in the ophthalmic literature. Methods: Case report of a subcutaneous mass in the periocular region of a 45-year old woman and a MEDLINE review of the ophthalmic and non-ophthalmic literature on ALHE and KD. Results: The clinical and histopathological findings of the present case were consistent with ALHE, but not with KD. A survey of the current ophthalmic literature indicates that these two designations are still often used synonymously, despite that non-ophthalmic papers now separate ALHE from KD. Conclusion: The clinical and histopathological features of ALHE are most often distinctly different from KD and these entities should be clearly separated in the ophthalmic literature.
- Published
- 2001
- Full Text
- View/download PDF