101. Prescribing Aerobic Exercise Intensity without a Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Post Stroke: Utility of the Six-Minute Walk Test
- Author
-
Dina Brooks, Marcella Calouro, Bradley J. MacIntosh, Daryl Dooks, Susan Marzolini, Rachel Goodman, Dale Corbett, and Paul Oh
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Walking ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,Oxygen Consumption ,Heart rate ,medicine ,Aerobic exercise ,Humans ,Prospective Studies ,Cardiovascular fitness ,Stroke ,Exercise ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Movement Disorders ,business.industry ,Rehabilitation ,Stroke Rehabilitation ,Cardiorespiratory fitness ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Exercise Therapy ,Treatment Outcome ,Cardiorespiratory Fitness ,Exercise intensity ,Physical therapy ,Regression Analysis ,Surgery ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Ventilatory threshold ,business ,Stroke recovery ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
The cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is an established method for determining target exercise training intensity (ventilatory threshold [VAT]) and cardiovascular risk; unfortunately, CPET is not readily accessible to people post stroke. The objective of this study was to determine the utility of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) as a less resource-intensive alternative to CPET for prescribing exercise intensity to people post stroke with motor impairments.Sixty participants (male, 71.7%; 13.5 ± 22.5 [mean ± standard deviation] months post stroke; age 64.5 ± 12.5 years, with a Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment score of 4.9 ± .9 of the leg) underwent 6MWT, CPET, balance, strength, and cognition assessments.6MWT heart rate (hr) was significantly lower than VAT-hr (92.3 ± 14.8 beats⋅min(-1) versus 99.8 ± 15.7 beats⋅min(-1), respectively, P .001; correlation r = .7, P .001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the 6MWT underestimated the VAT-hr by 7.7 ± 11.5%. The 95% confidence interval of the mean bias was large (14.8% and -30.3%), reflecting poor agreement, with 71.7% (n = 43) of the participants unable to reach a walking intensity at or above the VAT-hr. Lower oxygen uptake at the VAT (β = .655, P = .004), higher 6MWT-hr (β = 1.07, P = .01), and better balance (β = 1.128, P = .04) were associated with greater utility of the 6MWT for prescribing exercise.The 6MWT-hr was not interchangeable with the target training VAT-hr determined by CPET. However, in combination with CPET, the 6MWT will indicate when deficits preclude walking alone as the primary exercise modality for optimizing cardiovascular fitness. Future studies to develop a less resource-intensive, multimodal alternative to the CPET for prescribing exercise are needed. A modality that minimizes the effect of stroke deficits, specifically poor balance, should be included.
- Published
- 2016