101. Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Microwave Hepatic Ablation Near the Heart
- Author
-
Timothy J. Ziemlewicz, J. Louis Hinshaw, Fred T. Lee, M. Cristescu, Meghan G. Lubner, Shane A. Wells, Amanda R. Smolock, Christopher L. Brace, and George A. Carberry
- Subjects
Ablation Techniques ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Percutaneous ,Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ,Time Factors ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Hemodynamics ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,symbols.namesake ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,Heart rate ,medicine ,Electronic Health Records ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Microwaves ,Fisher's exact test ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Liver Neoplasms ,Margins of Excision ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Middle Aged ,Ablation ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Surgery ,Tumor Burden ,Blood pressure ,Treatment Outcome ,Heart Injuries ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,symbols ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Nuclear medicine ,Hemangioma ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,Ablation zone - Abstract
Purpose To evaluate safety and efficacy of percutaneous hepatic microwave (MW) ablation performed near the heart. Materials and Methods This study reviewed 118 consecutive peripheral (ablation zone margins within 5 mm of liver capsule) percutaneous MW hepatic ablations performed between June 2010 and August 2015. Ablation zones of 27 tumors (22.8%) extended to ≤ 5 mm from myocardium, and these ablations comprised the study group; the remaining ablations formed the control group. The study cohort included 14 men and 10 women (mean age, 59 y) with 16 hepatocellular carcinomas, 9 metastases, and 2 hemangiomas. Periprocedural imaging was used to evaluate tumor size and distance from the heart, ablation zone size, and complications. Mean tumor size and distance to myocardium were 2.6 cm ± 1.7 and 1.1 cm ± 1.1, respectively. The electronic medical record was used to retrospectively assess local tumor progression (LTP) and electrocardiogram and hemodynamic alterations during and after ablation. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher exact test and t test. Results Median follow-up was 13.6 months (range, 1.2–38.7 months). No arrhythmias occurred during or after ablation in the follow-up period (0/27). There was no difference between groups in frequency of alterations in periprocedural blood pressure (25.9% vs 29.6%, p=0.81) or heart rate (18.5% vs 24.2%, P = .61) or rate of LTP (12.0% vs 10.8%, P = 1.0). Conclusions Percutaneous MW ablation near the heart may be safe and effective, without increased risk of cardiac complications and with similar rates of LTP, compared with a control group of peripheral liver ablations.
- Published
- 2016