101. Biological versus mechanical prosthesis in 3279 patients from the Swedish in-patients register.
- Author
-
Hellgren, Laila, Granath, Fredrik, Ekbom, Anders, and Ståhle, Elisabeth
- Subjects
- *
HEART valve surgery , *PROSTHETICS , *THROMBOEMBOLISM , *CARDIOVASCULAR diseases - Abstract
Objectives. To compare valve-related morbidity among patients aged <70 and ≥≥70 years, receiving either a mechanical or a biological prosthesis in a population-based setting. Design. In total, 3279 patients (21 644 patient-years) were followed up through the Swedish National In-Patients Register, which registers all hospital admissions. Death, thromboembolism, bleeding, endocarditis, valve thrombosis and reoperations were all captured. Results. Survival was lower among patients aged <70 years with a bioprosthesis compared to a mechanical prosthesis (p < 0.0001), but equal among older patients. A mechanical prosthesis indicated a lower risk (p < 0.001) of thromboembolism (1.5% per patient year, ppy), than bioprosthesis (2.6% ppy), irrespective of age. Bleeding was increased (p == 0.002) with a mechanical prosthesis (1.7% ppy) compared to a bioprosthesis (1.1% ppy); the risk of bleeding increased early (<5 years) whereas thromboembolism increased late (>5 years). Event-free survival was higher in younger patients with a mechanical prosthesis compared to bioprosthesis recipients (p < 0.001), but equal among older patients. Conclusions. Survival was comparable in older patients irrespective of prosthesis type. Bleeding was increased with a mechanical prosthesis, especially in the elderly. The risk of thromboembolism was higher in patients with a bioprosthesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF