101. Impact of pre-admission physical activity on benefits of physiology-guided complete revascularization in older patients with myocardial infarction: insights from the FIRE trial.
- Author
-
Pavasini R, Campo G, Serenelli M, Tonet E, Guiducci V, Escaned J, Moreno R, Casella G, Cavazza C, Varbella F, Sacchetta G, Arena M, Santos IA, Ibañes EG, Scarsini R, D'Amico G, Ruiz-Poveda FL, Díez Gil JL, Pignatelli G, Iannopollo G, Colaiori I, Santos RC, Marrone A, Fileti L, Rigattieri S, Barbato E, Ocaranza-Sanchez R, and Biscaglia S
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Treatment Outcome, Time Factors, Sedentary Behavior, Risk Factors, Myocardial Revascularization methods, Age Factors, Patient Admission, Risk Assessment, Myocardial Infarction physiopathology, Myocardial Infarction mortality, Exercise
- Abstract
Aims: The present analysis from the Functional Assessment in Elderly Myocardial Infarction Patients with Multivessel Disease (FIRE) trial aims to explore the significance of pre-admission physical activity and assess whether the benefits of physiology-guided complete revascularization apply consistently to sedentary and active older patients., Methods and Results: Patients aged 75 years or more with myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel disease were randomized to receive physiology-guided complete revascularization or culprit-only strategy. The primary outcome was a composite of death, MI, stroke, or any revascularization within a year. Secondary endpoints included the composite of cardiovascular death or MI, as well as single components of the primary endpoint. Pre-admission physical activity was categorized into three groups: (i) absent (sedentary), (ii) light, and (iii) vigorous. Among 1445 patients, 692 (48%) were sedentary, whereas 560 (39%) and 193 (13%) performed light and vigorous physical activity, respectively. Patients engaging in light or vigorous pre-admission physical activity exhibited a reduced risk of the primary outcome compared with sedentary individuals [light hazard ratio (HR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.91 and vigorous HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.91, respectively]. These trends were also observed for death, cardiovascular death, or MI. When comparing physiology-guided complete revascularization vs. culprit-only strategy, no significant interaction was observed for primary and secondary endpoints when stratified by sedentary or active status., Conclusion: In older patients with MI, pre-admission physical activity emerges as a robust and independent prognostic determinant. Physiology-guided complete revascularization stands out an effective strategy in reducing ischaemic adverse events, irrespective of pre-admission physical activity status., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03772743., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: G.Cam. received research grants and personal fees from ABBOTT VASCULAR, personal fees from MENARINI, personal fees from AMGEN, personal fees from SANOFI, outside the submitted work. S.B. received personal fees from ABBOTT VASCULAR, outside the submitted work., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF