Search

Breast cancer is accompanied by systemic immunosuppression, which facilitates metastasis formation, but how this shapes organotropism of metastasis is poorly understood. Here, we investigate the impact of mammary tumorigenesis on regulatory T cells (T regs) in distant organs and how this affects multi-organ metastatic disease. Using a preclinical mouse mammary tumor model that recapitulates human metastatic breast cancer, we observe systemic accumulation of activated, highly immunosuppressive T regs during primary tumor growth. Tumor-educated T regs show tissue-specific transcriptional rewiring in response to mammary tumorigenesis. This has functional consequences for organotropism of metastasis, as T reg depletion reduces metastasis to tumor-draining lymph nodes, but not to lungs. Mechanistically, we find that T regs control natural killer (NK) cell activation in lymph nodes, thereby facilitating lymph node metastasis. In line, an increased T reg /NK cell ratio is observed in sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer patients compared with healthy controls. This study highlights that immune regulation of metastatic disease is highly organ dependent. [Display omitted] • Mammary tumorigenesis drives systemic expansion of highly immunosuppressive T regs • Tumor-educated T regs promote lymph node (LN) metastasis but not lung metastasis • T regs promote LN metastasis by local suppression of NK cells in the LN niche • LNs of breast cancer patients have elevated T reg and reduced NK cell accumulation Kos et al. demonstrate that breast cancer development is accompanied by systemic expansion of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells. The phenotype and function of tumor-educated T regs are uniquely shaped by the local tissue environment. Consequently, tumor-educated T regs impair local NK cell activity to enhance metastasis to lymph nodes, but not lungs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • Cancer cell-intrinsic mechanisms shape the secretome and neutrophil compartment. • Cancer cell (epi)genetics, signaling and metabolic state dictate neutrophil behavior. • Understanding how cancer cells manipulate neutrophils encourages precision medicine. • Targeting cancer cell-intrinsic processes to modulate neutrophil function in cancer. Neutrophils are multifaceted innate immune cells that play a significant role in the progression of cancer by exerting both pro- and anti-tumorigenic functions. The crosstalk between cancer cells and neutrophils is complex and emerging evidence is pointing at cancer cell-intrinsic programs regulating neutrophil abundance, phenotype and function. Cancer cell-derived soluble mediators are key players in modulating the interaction with neutrophils. Here, we review how intrinsic features of cancer cells, including cancer cell genetics, epigenetics, signaling, and metabolism, manipulate neutrophil behavior and how to target these processes to impact cancer progression. A molecular understanding of cancer cell-intrinsic properties that shape the crosstalk with neutrophils will provide novel therapeutic strategies for personalized immunomodulation in cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article offers information about a provocative aspect of resolution by key orchestrators of the inflammatory process called neutrophils, the first immune cells to arrive at sites of inflammation playing a critical role in the elimination of inflammatory stimuli and tissue repair. Other information such as reverse migration of neutrophils and critical components for resolution of inflammation is presented.

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are frequently the most abundant immune cells in cancers and are associated with poor survival. Here, we generated TAM molecular signatures from K14cre;Cdh1 flox/flox ;Trp53 flox/flox (KEP) and MMTV-NeuT (NeuT) transgenic mice that resemble human invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and HER2+ tumors, respectively. Determination of TAM-specific signatures requires comparison with healthy mammary tissue macrophages to avoid overestimation of gene expression differences. TAMs from the two models feature a distinct transcriptomic profile, suggesting that the cancer subtype dictates their phenotype. The KEP-derived signature reliably correlates with poor overall survival in ILC but not in triple-negative breast cancer patients, indicating that translation of murine TAM signatures to patients is cancer subtype dependent. Collectively, we show that a transgenic mouse tumor model can yield a TAM signature relevant for human breast cancer outcome prognosis and provide a generalizable strategy for determining and applying immune cell signatures provided the murine model reflects the human disease. • Murine TAM signatures prognosticate outcomes in corresponding cancer patients • TAM signatures are robust when they are compared with healthy tissue macrophages • TAM transcriptome is dictated by tissue and tumor subtype-related signals • Murine TAM signatures can be translated only when a suitable model is chosen Tuit et al. show that TAM transcriptomes in murine models of breast cancer are governed mainly by tissue and tumor subtype-specific signals. Clinical translation of murine signatures can be achieved when human and mouse breast tumor subtypes are matched and only upon proper comparison of TAMs with healthy tissue macrophages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article, the authors opine on an article by Bald and colleagues on spread of melanoma from its primary location to distant organs in the body. They also discusses role of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in promoting metastasis through the activation of an inflammatory response, involvement of non-cancer cells in driving metastasis, and HMGB1, a protein normally found in the nucleus of healthy cells. The authors also discuss blocking of neutrophil function in cancer.

While major improvements have been made in targeting primary tumor growth, metastasis and combating cancer spread remain an enigma. We recently identified a systemic inflammatory cascade involving IL17-producing γδ T cells and neutrophils that advance breast cancer metastasis. These data provide insights into how immune cells promote cancer spread. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The TP53 gene is mutated in approximately 30% of all breast cancer cases. Adipocytes and preadipocytes, which constitute a substantial fraction of the stroma of normal mammary tissue and breast tumors, undergo transcriptional, metabolic, and phenotypic reprogramming during breast cancer development and play an important role in tumor progression. We report here that p53 loss in breast cancer cells facilitates the reprogramming of preadipocytes, inducing them to acquire a unique transcriptional and metabolic program that combines impaired adipocytic differentiation with augmented cytokine expression. This, in turn, promotes the establishment of an inflammatory tumor microenvironment, including increased abundance of Ly6C+ and Ly6G+ myeloid cells and elevated expression of the immune checkpoint ligand PD-L1. We also describe a potential gain-of-function effect of common p53 missense mutations on the inflammatory reprogramming of preadipocytes. Altogether, our study implicates p53 deregulation in breast cancer cells as a driver of tumor-supportive adipose tissue reprogramming, expanding the network of non-cell autonomous mechanisms whereby p53 dysfunction may promote cancer. Further elucidation of the interplay between p53 and adipocytes within the tumor microenvironment may suggest effective therapeutic targets for the treatment of breast cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The chemokine system, comprising 48 chemokines and 23 receptors, is critically involved in several hallmarks of cancer. Yet, despite extensive efforts from the pharmaceutical sector, only two drugs aimed at this system are currently approved for clinical use against cancer. To date, numerous pharmacological approaches have been developed to successfully intervene at different stages of chemokine function: (i) chemokine availability; (ii) chemokine–glycosaminoglycan binding; and (iii) chemokine receptor binding. Many of these strategies have been tested in preclinical cancer models, and some have advanced to clinical trials as potential anticancer therapies. Here we will review the strategies and growing pharmacological toolbox for manipulating the chemokine system in cancer, and address novel methods poised for future (pre)clinical testing. The chemokine system has emerged as a relevant target in immune-oncology, with roles in most hallmarks of cancer. Therapeutic targeting of this system can be achieved by interfering with chemokines, chemokine receptors, or glycosaminoglycans. Many therapies aimed at the chemokine system are currently under clinical oncological investigation, including monoclonal antibodies targeting chemokines and their receptors, glycomimetics, and various peptides or small-molecule antagonists for chemokine receptors. Other strategies showed preclinical anticancer value and appear poised for clinical testing, including nanobodies, small-molecule chemokine inhibitors, engineered chemokines, pepducins, siRNA, and biased ligands. The emergence of chemokine receptor antagonists with novel mechanisms of action may prove more effective in the clinic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) with chemotherapy is now the standard of care for stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer; however, it is largely unknown for which patients ICI without chemotherapy could be an option and what the benefit of combination ICI could be. The adaptive BELLINI trial explored whether short combination ICI induces immune activation (primary end point, twofold increase in CD8 + T cells or IFNG), providing a rationale for neoadjuvant ICI without chemotherapy. Here, in window-of-opportunity cohorts A (4 weeks of anti-PD-1) and B (4 weeks of anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA4), we observed immune activation in 53% (8 of 15) and 60% (9 of 15) of patients, respectively. High levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes correlated with response. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed that higher pretreatment tumor-reactive CD8 + T cells, follicular helper T cells and shorter distances between tumor and CD8 + T cells correlated with response. Higher levels of regulatory T cells after treatment were associated with nonresponse. Based on these data, we opened cohort C for patients with high levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (≥50%) who received 6 weeks of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA4 followed by surgery (primary end point, pathological complete response). Overall, 53% (8 of 15) of patients had a major pathological response (<10% viable tumor) at resection, with 33% (5 of 15) having a pathological complete response. All cohorts met Simon's two-stage threshold for expansion to stage II. We observed grade ≥3 adverse events for 17% of patients and a high rate (57%) of immune-mediated endocrinopathies. In conclusion, neoadjuvant immunotherapy without chemotherapy demonstrates potential efficacy and warrants further investigation in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03815890 ., Competing Interests: Competing interests R.M.M. reports research grants from Siemens Healhtineers, Bayer Healthcare, Screenpoint Medical, Beckton & Dickinson, PA Imaging, Lunit and Koning, and is an advisory board member for Screenpoint, Bayer, Siemens and Guerbet, all outside the scope of this work. E. Kalashnikova is an employee of Natera. G.S.S. reports research funding to the institute from Merck, Agendia, AstraZeneca, Roche and Novartis and a consulting role for Novartis, Seattle Genetics and Biovica, outside the submitted work. S.C.L. reports research funding to the institute from Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, BMS, Tesaro, Merck, Immunomedics, Eurocept Pharmaceuticals, Agendia and Novartis and a consulting role and travel grant from Daiichi Sankyo, outside this work. C.U.B. has received research grants from Novartis, BMS and NanoString, is a paid advisory board member for BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lilly, GenMab and Pierre Fabre and holds ownership interest in Uniti Card, Neon Therapeutics and Forty Seven, all outside this submitted work. K.E.d.V. reports research funding from Roche and is a consultant for Macomics, outside the scope of this work. R.S. reports nonfinancial support from Merck and BMS, research support from Merck, Puma Biotechnology and Roche and personal fees from Roche, BMS and Exact Sciences for advisory boards, all outside the scope of this paper. L.F.A.W. reports funding to the institute from Genmab BV. T.N.S. is an advisor for Allogene Therapeutics, Asher Bio, Merus, Neogene Therapeutics and Scenic Biotech; is a stockholder in Allogene Therapeutics, Asher Bio, Cell Control, Celsius, Merus and Scenic Biotech; and is venture partner at Third Rock Ventures, all outside of the current work. M.K. reports research funding to the institute from BMS, Roche and AstraZeneca/MedImmune and an advisory role/speakers’ fee (all compensated to the institute) for Alderaan, BMS, Domain Therapeutics, Medscape, Roche, MSD and Daiichi Sankyo, outside the submitted work. Natera provided nonfinancial support to this study. The other authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The clinical successes of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in advanced cancer patients have recently spurred the clinical implementation of ICB in the neoadjuvant and perioperative setting. However, how neoadjuvant ICB therapy affects the systemic immune landscape and metastatic spread remains to be established. Tumors promote both local and systemic expansion of regulatory T cells (T regs ), which are key orchestrators of tumor-induced immunosuppression, contributing to immune evasion, tumor progression and metastasis. T regs express inhibitory immune checkpoint molecules and thus may be unintended targets for ICB therapy counteracting its efficacy. Using ICB-refractory models of spontaneous primary and metastatic breast cancer that recapitulate the poor ICB response of breast cancer patients, we observed that combined anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapy inadvertently promotes proliferation and activation of T regs in the tumor, tumor-draining lymph node and circulation. Also in breast cancer patients, T reg levels were elevated upon ICB. Depletion of T regs during neoadjuvant ICB in tumor-bearing mice not only reshaped the intratumoral immune landscape into a state favorable for ICB response but also induced profound and persistent alterations in systemic immunity, characterized by elevated CD8+ T cells and NK cells and durable T cell activation that was maintained after treatment cessation. While depletion of T regs in combination with neoadjuvant ICB did not inhibit primary tumor growth, it prolonged metastasis-related survival driven predominantly by CD8+ T cells. This study demonstrates that neoadjuvant ICB therapy of breast cancer can be empowered by simultaneous targeting of T regs, extending metastasis-related survival, independent of a primary tumor response., Competing Interests: K.E.d.V. reports research funding from Roche and is consultant for Macomics, outside the scope of this work. M.K. reports funding to the institute from BMS, Roche/Genentech, AZ and an advisory role for BMS, Roche, MSD and Daiichi Sankyo, outside the submitted work., (© 2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.)

Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is the second most common histological breast cancer subtype, but ILC-specific trials are lacking. Translational research revealed an immune-related ILC subset, and in mouse ILC models, synergy between immune checkpoint blockade and platinum was observed. In the phase II GELATO trial ( NCT03147040 ), patients with metastatic ILC were treated with weekly carboplatin (area under the curve 1.5 mg ml -1 min -1 ) as immune induction for 12 weeks and atezolizumab (PD-L1 blockade; triweekly) from the third week until progression. Four of 23 evaluable patients had a partial response (17%), and 2 had stable disease, resulting in a clinical benefit rate of 26%. From these six patients, four had triple-negative ILC (TN-ILC). We observed higher CD8 + T cell infiltration, immune checkpoint expression and exhausted T cells after treatment. With this GELATO trial, we show that ILC-specific clinical trials are feasible and demonstrate promising antitumor activity of atezolizumab with carboplatin, particularly for TN-ILC, and provide insights for the design of highly needed ILC-specific trials., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Tumours display an astonishing variation in the spatial distribution, composition and activation state of immune cells, which impacts their progression and response to immunotherapy. Shedding light on the mechanisms that govern the diversity and function of immune cells in the tumour microenvironment will pave the way for the development of more tailored immunomodulatory strategies for the benefit of patients with cancer. Cancer cells, by virtue of their paracrine and juxtacrine communication mechanisms, are key contributors to intertumour heterogeneity in immune contextures. In this Review, we discuss how cancer cell-intrinsic features, including (epi)genetic aberrations, signalling pathway deregulation and altered metabolism, play a key role in orchestrating the composition and functional state of the immune landscape, and influence the therapeutic benefit of immunomodulatory strategies. Moreover, we highlight how targeting cancer cell-intrinsic parameters or their downstream immunoregulatory pathways is a viable strategy to manipulate the tumour immune milieu in favour of antitumour immunity., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

Cancers represent complex ecosystems comprising tumor cells and a multitude of non-cancerous cells, embedded in an altered extracellular matrix. The tumor microenvironment (TME) includes diverse immune cell types, cancer-associated fibroblasts, endothelial cells, pericytes, and various additional tissue-resident cell types. These host cells were once considered bystanders of tumorigenesis but are now known to play critical roles in the pathogenesis of cancer. The cellular composition and functional state of the TME can differ extensively depending on the organ in which the tumor arises, the intrinsic features of cancer cells, the tumor stage, and patient characteristics. Here, we review the importance of the TME in each stage of cancer progression, from tumor initiation, progression, invasion, and intravasation to metastatic dissemination and outgrowth. Understanding the complex interplay between tumor cell-intrinsic, cell-extrinsic, and systemic mediators of disease progression is critical for the rational development of effective anti-cancer treatments., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests K.E.d.V. reports research funding from Roche/Genentech and is a consultant for Macomics. J.A.J. currently serves on the scientific advisory board of Pionyr Immunotherapeutics and received an honorarium for speaking at a research symposium organized by Bristol Meyers Squibb (last 3 years). J.A.J. is also a member of the Cancer Cell editorial advisory board., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has heralded a new era in cancer therapy. Research into the mechanisms underlying response to ICB has predominantly focused on T cells; however, effective immune responses require tightly regulated crosstalk between innate and adaptive immune cells. Here, we combine unbiased analysis of blood and tumors from metastatic breast cancer patients treated with ICB with mechanistic studies in mouse models of breast cancer. We observe an increase in systemic and intratumoral eosinophils in patients and mice responding to ICB treatment. Mechanistically, ICB increased IL-5 production by CD4 + T cells, stimulating elevated eosinophil production from the bone marrow, leading to systemic eosinophil expansion. Additional induction of IL-33 by ICB-cisplatin combination or recombinant IL-33 promotes intratumoral eosinophil infiltration and eosinophil-dependent CD8 + T cell activation to enhance ICB response. This work demonstrates the critical role of eosinophils in ICB response and provides proof-of-principle for eosinophil engagement to enhance ICB efficacy., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests O.S.B., H.G., L.S., L.V., O.I.I., E.v.D., N.B., C.K., M.D., K. Kersten, M.B., D.P., C.-S.H., K.V., E.A.M.R., D.K., L.H., K. Kos, I.S.A., P.K., R.B., and D.S.T. have no competing interests to declare. M.C. reports funding to the institute from BMS and Roche/Genentech and an advisory role for BMS, outside the submitted work. W.S.M.E.T. reports receiving grants from MSD during the conduct of the PEMBRO-RT trial. P.B. reports receiving grants and medication delivery from MSD during the conduct of the PEMBRO-RT trial as well as grants and consultancy fees from BMS outside the submitted work. E.E.V. is legally responsible for all contracts with pharmaceutical companies at the NKI and reports research funding from BMS, outside the submitted work. L.F.A.W. reports funding to the institute from Genmab BV. K.E.d.V. reports research funding from Roche/Genentech and is consultant for Macomics, outside the scope of this work. M.K. reports funding to the institute from BMS, Roche/Genentech, AZ, and an advisory role for BMS, Roche, MSD, and Daiichi Sankyo, outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immunoediting sculpts immunogenicity and thwarts host anti-tumor responses in tumor cells during tumorigenesis; however, it remains unknown whether metabolic programming of tumor cells can be guided by immunosurveillance. Here, we report that T cell-mediated immunosurveillance in early-stage tumorigenesis instructs c-Myc upregulation and metabolic reprogramming in tumor cells. This previously unexplored tumor-immune interaction is controlled by non-canonical interferon gamma (IFNγ)-STAT3 signaling and supports tumor immune evasion. Our findings uncover that immunoediting instructs deregulated bioenergetic programs in tumor cells to empower them to disarm the T cell-mediated immunosurveillance by imposing metabolic tug-of-war between tumor and infiltrating T cells and forming the suppressive tumor microenvironment., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests P.-C.H. is a member of the scientific advisory board for Elixiron Immunotherapeutics and received research grants from Elixiron Immunotherapeutics. P.-C.H. is also a founder of Pilatus Biosciences., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The limited efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients is attributed to sparse or unresponsive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, but the mechanisms that lead to a therapy resistant tumor immune microenvironment are incompletely known. Here we show a strong correlation between MYC expression and loss of immune signatures in human TNBC. In mouse models of TNBC proficient or deficient of breast cancer type 1 susceptibility gene (BRCA1), MYC overexpression dramatically decreases lymphocyte infiltration in tumors, along with immune signature remodelling. MYC-mediated suppression of inflammatory signalling induced by BRCA1/2 inactivation is confirmed in human TNBC cell lines. Moreover, MYC overexpression prevents the recruitment and activation of lymphocytes in both human and mouse TNBC co-culture models. Chromatin-immunoprecipitation-sequencing reveals that MYC, together with its co-repressor MIZ1, directly binds promoters of multiple interferon-signalling genes, resulting in their downregulation. MYC overexpression thus counters tumor growth inhibition by a Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) agonist via suppressing induction of interferon signalling. Together, our data reveal that MYC suppresses innate immunity and facilitates tumor immune escape, explaining the poor immunogenicity of MYC-overexpressing TNBCs., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is treated to prevent subsequent ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC). However, many DCIS lesions will never become invasive. To prevent overtreatment, we need to distinguish harmless from potentially hazardous DCIS. We investigated whether the immune microenvironment (IME) in DCIS correlates with transition to iIBC., Methods: Patients were derived from a Dutch population-based cohort of 10,090 women with pure DCIS with a median follow-up time of 12 years. Density, composition and proximity to the closest DCIS cell of CD20 + B-cells, CD3 + CD8 + T-cells, CD3 + CD8 - T-cells, CD3 + FOXP3 + regulatory T-cells, CD68 + cells, and CD8 + Ki67 + T-cells was assessed with multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) with digital whole-slide analysis and compared between primary DCIS lesions of 77 women with subsequent iIBC (cases) and 64 without (controls)., Results: Higher stromal density of analysed immune cell subsets was significantly associated with higher grade, ER negativity, HER-2 positivity, Ki67 ≥ 14%, periductal fibrosis and comedonecrosis (P < 0.05). Density, composition and proximity to the closest DCIS cell of all analysed immune cell subsets did not differ between cases and controls., Conclusion: IME features analysed by mIF in 141 patients from a well-annotated cohort of pure DCIS with long-term follow-up are no predictors of subsequent iIBC, but do correlate with other factors (grade, ER, HER2 status, Ki-67) known to be associated with invasive recurrences., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Breast cancer is accompanied by systemic immunosuppression, which facilitates metastasis formation, but how this shapes organotropism of metastasis is poorly understood. Here, we investigate the impact of mammary tumorigenesis on regulatory T cells (T regs ) in distant organs and how this affects multi-organ metastatic disease. Using a preclinical mouse mammary tumor model that recapitulates human metastatic breast cancer, we observe systemic accumulation of activated, highly immunosuppressive T regs during primary tumor growth. Tumor-educated T regs show tissue-specific transcriptional rewiring in response to mammary tumorigenesis. This has functional consequences for organotropism of metastasis, as T reg depletion reduces metastasis to tumor-draining lymph nodes, but not to lungs. Mechanistically, we find that T regs control natural killer (NK) cell activation in lymph nodes, thereby facilitating lymph node metastasis. In line, an increased T reg /NK cell ratio is observed in sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer patients compared with healthy controls. This study highlights that immune regulation of metastatic disease is highly organ dependent., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests K.E.d.V. reports research funding from Roche/Genentech and is a consultant for Macomics outside the scope of this work. R.v.d.V. reports research funding from Genmab. T.D.d.G. received research support from Idera Pharmaceuticals; advisory/consultancy fees from LAVA Therapeutics, Parner Therapeutics, and Immunicum; and owns stock from LAVA Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) regulates gene expression, governing aspects of homeostasis, but is also involved in cancer. Pharmacological GR activation is frequently used to alleviate therapy-related side-effects. While prior studies have shown GR activation might also have anti-proliferative action on tumours, the underpinnings of glucocorticoid action and its direct effectors in non-lymphoid solid cancers remain elusive. Here, we study the mechanisms of glucocorticoid response, focusing on lung cancer. We show that GR activation induces reversible cancer cell dormancy characterised by anticancer drug tolerance, and activation of growth factor survival signalling accompanied by vulnerability to inhibitors. GR-induced dormancy is dependent on a single GR-target gene, CDKN1C, regulated through chromatin looping of a GR-occupied upstream distal enhancer in a SWI/SNF-dependent fashion. These insights illustrate the importance of GR signalling in non-lymphoid solid cancer biology, particularly in lung cancer, and warrant caution for use of glucocorticoids in treatment of anticancer therapy related side-effects., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Metastatic disease is responsible for approximately 90% of cancer deaths. For successful dissemination and metastasis, cancer cells must evade detection and destruction by the immune system. This process is enabled by factors secreted by the primary tumour that shape both the intratumoural microenvironment and the systemic immune landscape. Here, we review the evidence of aberrant immune cell crosstalk in metastasis formation and the role that primary tumours play in hijacking these interactions in order to enhance their metastatic potential. Moreover, we highlight the intriguing parallels between the inflammatory pathways underlying inflammatory disorders and cancer progression.

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) play a major role in establishing an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In order to fully uncover their role and molecular regulation in tumor-bearing hosts, it is critical to combine phenotypical characterization with functional analyses. A standard method to determine the suppressive potential of Tregs is with an in vitro suppression assay, in which the impact of freshly isolated Tregs on T cell proliferation is assessed. The assay requires the isolation of substantial numbers of Tregs from tissues and tumors, which can be challenging due to low yield or cell damage during sample preparation. In this chapter, we discuss a flexible suppression assay which can be used to assess the suppressive potential of low numbers of murine Tregs, directly isolated from tumors. We describe methods for tissue preparation, flow cytometry-based sorting of Tregs and optimal conditions to perform a suppression assay, to obtain reliable and reproducible results., (© 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The progression of cancer is strongly influenced by the crosstalk between cancer cells and immune cells. Immune cells can have both pro- and anti-tumor functions depending on the signals present in the environment. A significant proportion of the immune compartment of most solid tumors consists of tumor-associated macrophages. Although their abundance has been associated with poor prognosis in many solid tumor types, the molecular mechanisms by which cancer cells influence macrophage phenotype and function are largely unknown. In this chapter, we provide a detailed description of in vitro assays to study the impact of cancer cells on macrophages. We provide protocols to obtain macrophages from murine bone marrow and human peripheral blood, and to expose these macrophages to cancer cell-derived secreted molecules using conditioned medium from cancer cells. We describe several assays to assess cancer cell-induced polarization of macrophages. This experimental set-up can be utilized to gain molecular insights into how cancer cells influence macrophages., (© 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cancer-associated systemic inflammation is strongly linked to poor disease outcome in patients with cancer 1,2 . For most human epithelial tumour types, high systemic neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios are associated with poor overall survival 3 , and experimental studies have demonstrated a causal relationship between neutrophils and metastasis 4,5 . However, the cancer-cell-intrinsic mechanisms that dictate the substantial heterogeneity in systemic neutrophilic inflammation between tumour-bearing hosts are largely unresolved. Here, using a panel of 16 distinct genetically engineered mouse models for breast cancer, we uncover a role for cancer-cell-intrinsic p53 as a key regulator of pro-metastatic neutrophils. Mechanistically, loss of p53 in cancer cells induced the secretion of WNT ligands that stimulate tumour-associated macrophages to produce IL-1β, thus driving systemic inflammation. Pharmacological and genetic blockade of WNT secretion in p53-null cancer cells reverses macrophage production of IL-1β and subsequent neutrophilic inflammation, resulting in reduced metastasis formation. Collectively, we demonstrate a mechanistic link between the loss of p53 in cancer cells, secretion of WNT ligands and systemic neutrophilia that potentiates metastatic progression. These insights illustrate the importance of the genetic makeup of breast tumours in dictating pro-metastatic systemic inflammation, and set the stage for personalized immune intervention strategies for patients with cancer.

The efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is low 1-5 , highlighting a need for strategies that render the tumor microenvironment more sensitive to PD-1 blockade. Preclinical research has suggested immunomodulatory properties for chemotherapy and irradiation 6-13 . In the first stage of this adaptive, non-comparative phase 2 trial, 67 patients with metastatic TNBC were randomized to nivolumab (1) without induction or with 2-week low-dose induction, or with (2) irradiation (3 × 8 Gy), (3) cyclophosphamide, (4) cisplatin or (5) doxorubicin, all followed by nivolumab. In the overall cohort, the objective response rate (ORR; iRECIST 14 ) was 20%. The majority of responses were observed in the cisplatin (ORR 23%) and doxorubicin (ORR 35%) cohorts. After doxorubicin and cisplatin induction, we detected an upregulation of immune-related genes involved in PD-1-PD-L1 (programmed death ligand 1) and T cell cytotoxicity pathways. This was further supported by enrichment among upregulated genes related to inflammation, JAK-STAT and TNF-α signaling after doxorubicin. Together, the clinical and translational data of this study indicate that short-term doxorubicin and cisplatin may induce a more favorable tumor microenvironment and increase the likelihood of response to PD-1 blockade in TNBC. These data warrant confirmation in TNBC and exploration of induction treatments prior to PD-1 blockade in other cancer types.