Search

VIALE-C compared the safety and efficacy of venetoclax or placebo plus low-dose cytarabine (+LDAC) in patients with untreated AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Overall, 211 patients were enrolled (n = 143, venetoclax; n = 68, placebo). At the primary analysis, the study did not meet its primary endpoint of a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS), however, ~60% of patients had been on study for ≤6-months. Here, we present an additional 6-months of follow-up of VIALE-C (median follow-up 17.5 months; range 0.1–23.5). Median OS was (venetoclax +LDAC vs. placebo +LDAC) 8.4 vs. 4.1 months (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.50,0.99; P = 0.040); a 30% reduction in the risk of death with venetoclax. Complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rates were 48.3% vs. 13.2%. Transfusion independence rates (RBC) were 43% vs.19% and median event-free survival was 4.9 vs. 2.1 months (HR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.44,0.84; P = 0.002). These results represent improved efficacy over the primary analysis. Incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events were similar between study arms and overall safety profiles were comparable to the primary analysis. These data support venetoclax +LDAC as a frontline treatment option for patients with AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03069352.

Introduction Midostaurin is the only approved FLT3 inhibitor for combination with intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with FLT3 mutant AML. The FLT3 inhibitor, sorafenib, was investigated in the randomized SORAML trial (Röllig, Lancet Onc 2015), in combination with intensive chemotherapy (IC) for newly diagnosed adults with AML Methods The Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) conducted a randomized phase 2 study [ACTRN12611001112954] in 99 adults aged 18-65 years with newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD positive (allelic ratio (AR) ≥0.05) AML to determine whether addition of SOR to IC would improve event-free survival (EFS). The study was powered to identify a 25% increase in 2-year EFS with SOR. Patients 18-55 yrs received induction with IDAC-3 (idarubicin [IDA] 12 mg/m2 D1-3 and ara-C 1.5 g/m2 BD D1,3,5,7); patients 56-65 received 7+3 (IDA 12 mg/m2 D1-3 and ara-C 100 mg/m2 D1-7 IVI). Patients were randomized 2:1 to SOR or PBO 400 mg BD on days 4-10 of induction and each consolidation cycle. Due to the pharmacokinetic interaction between SOR and azoles, antifungal prophylaxis during induction was with AmBisome 5 mg/kg IV twice weekly. For consolidation, patients 18-55 yrs received 2 cycles of IcE (IDA 9 mg/m2 D1-2, ara-C 100 mg/m2 D1-5 IVI and etoposide 75 mg/m2 D1-5), those 56-65 yrs received 2 cycles of IDAC-2 (IDA 12 mg/m2 D1-2 and ara-C 1g/m2 BD D1,3,5). Maintenance was with SOR/PBO 400 mg bd days 1-28 for 12 cycles. Allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) was at investigator discretion. SOR/PBO was not continued post allo-HCT. The primary endpoint was EFS without censoring for allo-HCT with events defined as failure to achieve complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), relapse or death. Pre-specified secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) defined as CR and CRi, tolerability, EFS according to FLT3-ITD AR < or ≥ 0.7 and impact of randomization on allograft outcome. Results Between Jan 2013-May 2018, 18 centers randomized 99 patients to induction with either SOR (n=65) or PBO (n=33); one patient later found to be FLT3-ITD negative was excluded. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Treatment arms were balanced apart from fewer patients in the SOR arm with NPM1 mutant AML. Deliverability of therapy was comparable, with commencement of consolidation in 78% and 79% and maintenance therapy in 32% and 27% in the SOR and PBO arms, respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was high in both arms; 91% in the SOR (CR 80%, CRi 11%) and 94% in the PBO (CR 70%, CRi 24%) arm. In the SOR arm, 5% achieved partial remission, went off study and were deemed treatment failures. With a median overall follow-up of 25 mo, there was no significant difference in EFS (HR 0.87 95% CI 0.50-1.49; P=0.61)(Fig A) or OS (HR 0.70 95% CI 0.38-1.29; P=0.26)(Fig. B), nor in a sensitivity analysis with censoring at HCT. 2 yr EFS was 47.9% (SOR) vs 45.4% (PBO) and 2-year OS 66.8% (SOR) vs 56.4% (PBO). Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in CR1 was performed in 62% and 58% in the SOR and PBO arms, respectively. For patients in CR1, 2 yr OS post-HCT was 78.5% (SOR) vs 54.2% (PBO)(Fig C). Suggestive of an on-target effect against FLT3-ITD, the impact of SOR on OS appeared greater for patients with higher FLT3-ITD AR ≥0.7 (Fig. D) (Table 2). Only one early death (within 30 days) was recorded in each treatment arm. The frequency of grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were similar between the two arms, apart from palmar-plantar rash, reported as drug-related in 15.4% and 6.1% pts in the SOR and PBO arms, respectively. Correlative studies will be reported in a companion abstract. Conclusions SOR did not improve EFS when combined with intensive chemotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD AML. Although not powered for significance, SOR showed a trend for improved OS among patients with higher FLT3-ITD AR or receiving HCT in CR1. Further exploration of more potent FLT3 inhibitors in the pre- and post-allograft setting are warranted for patients with newly diagnosed FLT3 mutant AML. Acknowledgements: The ALLG AMLM16 trial was funded through an Australian Government NHMRC grant and a research grant from the Leukaemia Foundation of Australia. Bayer supplied sorafenib and Gilead AmBisome. Disclosures Wei: Roche: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research: Patents & Royalties: AW is eligible for royalty payments related to venetoclax; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Macrogenics: Honoraria. Enjeti:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. D'Rozario:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/ Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marlton:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Verner:Janssen Cilag Pty Ltd.: Research Funding. Hahn:Roche: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria. Hiwase:Novartis Australia: Research Funding. Anstee:Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties: milestone and royalty payments related to venetoclax.. Levis:FujiFilm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Menarini: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bajel:Abbvie: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria. Roberts:Genentech: Patents & Royalties: for venetoclax to one of my employers (Walter & Eliza Hall Institute); I receive a share of these royalties; Janssen: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Sorafenib for FLT3-ITD AML

Background: Approximately 40-60% of older patients (pts) with AML achieve complete remission (CR) with IC. Factors influencing the use of consolidation after induction include disease-related considerations, extent of hematopoietic recovery, pt fitness, and physician and pt preference. Most older pts who achieve AML remission will experience disease relapse despite consolidation therapy (Schlenk, Haematologica, 2018). In the phase III, randomized, double-blind QUAZAR AML-001 Maintenance Trial, CC-486, an oral hypomethylating agent, was shown to significantly prolong OS and RFS vs. placebo (PBO) in pts with AML in first remission following induction ± consolidation. Prior to study entry, the use of consolidation chemotherapy and number of consolidation cycles was at the discretion of the treating physician, with study eligibility not contingent on the use of consolidation. Objective: Assess survival outcomes in the QUAZAR AML-001 trial in pt subgroups defined by number of consolidation courses received before study entry. Methods: Eligible pts were aged ≥55 years with newly diagnosed AML, intermediate- or poor-risk cytogenetics, and ECOG PS ≤3. Within 4 months (mo) of attaining first CR or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), pts were randomized 1:1 to CC-486 300 mg or PBO QD for 14 days per 28-day treatment (Tx) cycle. OS and RFS were compared among pts who received no consolidation ("No Consolidation"), 1 cycle of consolidation ("1 Consolidation"), or ≥2 cycles of consolidation ("≥2 Consolidations"). For these analyses, "induction" and "consolidation" defined regimens received before and after, respectively, the reported date of first CR/CRi. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death, and RFS as time from randomization to relapse or death. Kaplan-Meier OS/RFS estimates were compared for CC-486 vs. PBO using log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were generated using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. These analyses were not powered sufficiently to determine statistical significance. Results: 472 pts were randomized to CC-486 (N=238) or PBO (N=234). Most pts (80%) received consolidation before study entry. The No Consolidation cohort comprised 94 pts (20%; CC-486 52, PBO 42), the 1 Consolidation cohort comprised 212 pts (45%; CC-486 110, PBO 102), and the ≥2 Consolidations cohort comprised 166 pts (35%; CC-486 76, PBO 90), including 19 pts (CC-486 6, PBO 13) who received 3 consolidation cycles. Common agents used for consolidation were cytarabine (377/378 pts), idarubicin (95/378), and daunorubicin (37/378). While most pts received 1 induction, 97 pts received ≥2 induction courses; of them, 21 (CC-486 14, PBO 7) did not receive consolidation and 76 (CC-486 43, PBO 33) received ≥1 consolidation cycle. Baseline characteristics (eg, CR / CRi after IC, ECOG PS, cytogenetic risk at diagnosis) were generally similar among Tx arms and cohorts. Median (range) ages of pts in the 0 / 1 / ≥2 Consolidation cohorts were 71 (58-84), 68 (55-86), and 67 (55-82) years, respectively. In the No Consolidation cohort, median OS from the time of randomization with CC-486 vs. PBO was 23.3 vs. 10.9 mo, respectively (HR 0.55 [95%CI 0.34, 0.89]), and median RFS was 8.4 vs. 3.9 mo (0.55 [0.34, 0.88]) (Figure A). In the 1 Consolidation cohort, median OS was 21.0 vs. 14.3 mo with CC-486 vs. PBO, respectively (HR 0.75 [95%CI 0.55, 1.02]), and median RFS was 10.0 vs. 4.7 mo (0.72 [0.53, 0.99]) (Figure B). In the ≥2 Consolidations cohort, median OS was 28.6 mo with CC-486 vs. 17.6 mo with PBO (HR 0.75 [95%CI 0.50, 1.11]), and median RFS was 13.0 vs. 6.1 mo (0.59 [0.41, 0.87]) (Figure C). Conclusions: CC-486 was associated with consistent survival benefits vs. PBO regardless of number of prior consolidation cycles. Use of consolidation was generally associated with nominal improvements in OS and RFS within each Tx arm; however, in the CC-486 arm, median OS for pts who did not receive consolidation was similar to those who received 1 consolidation cycle (23.3 and 21.0 mo, respectively). Results should be interpreted with caution, as these cohorts were not prospectively defined and the study was not powered to detect significant differences between subgroups. Nevertheless, these data clearly suggest that older pts with AML in first remission after induction can benefit from CC-486, regardless of their fitness to receive consolidation or the number of consolidation cycles received before starting CC-486. Disclosures Wei: AMGEN: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Astellas: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Macrogenics: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Speakers Bureau; Astra-Zeneca: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Other. Roboz:Orsenix: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Array BioPharma: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Jasper Therapeutics: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; MEI Pharma: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy. Dombret:Sunesis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Shire-Baxalta: Consultancy; Immunogen: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Menarini: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Nova: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Cellectis: Consultancy. Döhner:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AROG: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Research Funding; Oxford Biomedicals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Helsinn: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; GEMoaB: Consultancy, Honoraria. Selleslag:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Belgian College: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. La Torre:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Skikne:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Kumar:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Dong:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Beach:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ravandi:Macrogenics: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Orsenix: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Xencor: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Recent regulatory approval of midostaurin, a FLT3 targeting small molecular inhibitor, will likely lead to increased use of midostaurin in combination with intensive chemotherapy for patients with FLT3-mutant AML. Translation of clinical trial results into everyday practice has its challenges. This study compared the relevance of the trial population and practices studied in the midostaurin registration study (RATIFY) with real-world practice in terms of patient factors, chemotherapy, mutation-specific frequencies and clinical outcomes among patients with FLT3-mutant AML in the pre-midostaurin era (2010-2015) in Australia. We observed substantial diversity of chemotherapy regimens used in the community and limitations of the generalizability of eligibility criteria used in RATIFY (such as age and hyperleukocytosis). This study provides real-world historical data that may be used for comparison with future trial cohorts incorporating FLT3 inhibitors into the management of FLT3-mutant AML and highlights the inherent difficulties in translating clinical trial data into routine practice.

Since Jehovah's Witness (JW) patients diagnosed with leukaemia refuse blood transfusions, they are often denied intensive chemotherapy for fear they could not survive myeloablation without blood transfusion support. Treatment of JW patients with acute leukaemia is challenging and carries a higher morbidity and mortality; however, the refusal of blood products should not be an absolute contraindication to offer multiple treatment modalities including haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In this review we discuss their optimal management and describe alternative modalities to blood transfusions to provide sufficient oxygenation and prevent bleeding.

T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is a rare disease usually treated with intensive, high-dose consolidation chemotherapy followed by an allotransplant in a substantial number of patients. The data of the RALL-2009 study on 125 adult T-ALL patients suggest that similar total chemotherapy doses given less intensively over a longer interval without interruptions and with an auto- rather than an allotransplant produce outcomes like current more intensive protocols and an allotransplant: 9-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and survival were 24% (95% CI 16–33%), 70% (95% CI 59–79%) and 62% (95% CI 51–72%). In a landmark analysis, subjects achieving a complete remission and receiving an autotransplant had a lower 9-year CIR (9% [95% CI 2–22%] vs. 29% [95% CI 16–43%]; p = 0.0076) and better LFS (91% [95% CI 79–98%] vs. 58% [95% CI 41–74%]; p = 0.0009) and survival (92% [95% CI 77–99%] vs. 60% [95% CI 44–77%]; p = 0.001) compared with subjects not receiving an autotransplant. In a multivariate analysis, white blood cells ≥100 × 109/L at study entry were significantly associated with worse LFS (HR = 2.842 [95% CI 1.131–7.143]; p = 0.0263) and survival (HR = 6.085 [95% CI 1.918–19.3]; p = 0.0022) because of more early deaths (HR = 2.42 [95% CI 1.04–5.67]; p = 0.041). Receiving an autotransplant correlated with a lower CIR (HR = 0.23 [95% CI 0.07–0.73]; p = 0.0136) and better LFS (HR = 0.27 [95% CI 0.08–0.85]; p = 0.0256) and survival (HR = 0.158 [95% CI 0.045–0.550]; p = 0.0037).

Patients with hematological malignancies undergoing intensive chemotherapy or due to their underlying disease often suffer from serious infections during neutropenia. One possibility of bridging ne...

The addition of midostaurin, a FLT3-inhibitor, to intensive chemotherapy (IC) was previously shown to improve outcome of younger patients with FLT3-mutated AML. The toxicity and efficacy of adding midostaurin to IC in patients not originally included in the RATIFY study or with intensified daunorubicin dosing are unknown. We conducted a retrospective, multi-center, historical-control study to characterize the safety and efficacy of adding midostaurin to IC in a “real-world” setting. Sixty-nine adult patients were included in the analysis (midostaurin n = 34, historical controls n = 35) with a mean follow-up of 18.4 (± 15) months. Median age of patients was 60 (range 26–82) years; 32% and 20% of patients were > 65 and 70 years, respectively. No differences in baseline characteristics were noted between the groups. Midostaurin was administered with 90 mg/m2 daunorubicin in 29% of patients; One-third of patients experienced dose reductions/interruptions during midostaurin therapy. Overall toxicity was comparable between the midostaurin and control groups.CR/CRi rates were higher in patients treated with midostaurin compared with controls (80% vs. 57%, p = 0.047) and significantly more patients in the midostaurin group were transplanted in first remission (95% vs. 68%, p = 0.04).Median OS and DFS were higher in the midostaurin vs. control group (not reached vs. 11 months (p = 0.085) and 13 vs. 6 months (p = 0.09), respectively). In our analysis, midostaurin was not associated with increased toxicity including in older patients, in those with secondary AML or when administered with intensified daunorubicin dosage. Higher remission rates in the midostaurin group and increased transplantation rates in first CR were associated with a trend towards better outcomes.

Incorporating bortezomib and/or lenalidomide in the management of plasmablastic lymphoma is an attractive option due to the reported high response rates. However, concerns about overlapping toxicities can deter clinicians from incorporating these novel agents into chemotherapy. In this case report we describe a patient with plasmablastic lymphoma, who received both lenalidomide and bortezomib as part of upfront treatment for a high-risk plasmablastic lymphoma. After completing intensive chemotherapy, the patient was transitioned to a regimen of daily lenalidomide and biweekly bortezomib to decrease the chance of relapse. This maintenance phase was given for 6 months and was well tolerated. Despite having multiple adverse risk factors, the patient remains in remission, 18 months following diagnosis.

Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is highly aggressive and requires very intensive chemotherapy approaches for successful treatment. Although "standard" approaches are tolerated in young patients, this is not the case in older adults, and new approaches that lower toxicity but maintain high curability are needed and are currently in development. Recently, high-grade B-cell lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements have been categorized separately from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or BL. These have poor outcomes and many exciting novel approaches are being tested in an attempt to augment curability. These diseases harbor many interesting targets for rational small molecule inhibition in future trials.

A recent phase 3 trial showed that outcome of older patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may be improved by a liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin (CPX‐351). This phase 3 study represents a unique example of prospective data in this rare subgroup providing basis for comparison with real life data. Here, we retrospectively assessed characteristics and outcome of patients aged 60‐75 years with secondary or therapy‐related AML in real life. Out of 218 patients that fulfilled CPX‐351 study criteria, 181 patients (83.0%) received antileukemic treatment either intensive chemotherapy (n = 121) or hypomethylating agents (HMA, n = 60). As compared with patients treated by chemotherapy, HMA‐treated patients were older, had lower WBC, more often AML with antecedent myelodysplastic syndrome and adverse cytogenetic risk. In chemotherapy‐treated patients, the complete response rate was 69%, median overall survival (OS) was 11 months whereas 3‐year and 5‐year OS was 21% and 17%, respectively. In HMA‐treated patients, the complete response rate was 15%, median OS was 11 months whereas 3‐year and 5‐year OS was 15% and 2%, respectively. In conclusion, although outcome of older patients with high‐risk AML is very poor, a significant proportion of patients treated by standard intensive chemotherapy but not HMA are long‐term survivors.

Secondary AML (sAML), referring to AML arising after prior cytotoxic/radiation/immunosuppressive therapy (tAML) or an antecedent hematologic disorder, now primarily classified as AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC), accounts for 10%–30% of AML cases and is associated with a poor prognosis. sAML has historically been treated with intensive chemotherapy (eg, 7 + 3) or less aggressive regimens (eg, low-dose cytarabine or azacytidine for older/unfit patients); however, outcomes are typically poor, especially for older adults. Recently, CPX-351, a liposomal co-encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin at a synergistic ratio, demonstrated improved front-line outcomes in older patients with high-risk/sAML. CPX-351 has been approved for adults with newly diagnosed tAML or AML-MRC and has an NCCN category 1 recommendation for induction therapy of patients aged >60 years with high-risk/sAML. Other novel therapies may also benefit certain sAML subgroups. Greater clarity around the optimal diagnosis and treatment of sAML patients is needed to improve outcomes in this high-risk subpopulation.

Therapeutic decision making is often challenging in older AML patients. We collected retrospective data of 355 consecutive AML patients (>= 60 years) who were treated with intensive chemotherapy (IC) (n=155), hypomethylating agents (HMA) (n=83), or best supportive care (BSC) (n=117) between 2002 and 2017. Overall survival (OS) and response rates after therapy were analyzed. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to analyze the impact of different treatment strategies on survival. The median OS was not significantly different between patients treated with IC or HMA (14.9 vs 10.9 months; HR=1.32, p=0.076)), despite a difference in complete remission rate (59% after IC vs 35% after HMA). Patients who received a allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo HCT) after treatment with IC or HMA had a significant survival benefit compared to patient who didn't proceed to allo HCT (median OS 65 vs 8 months, respectively, p

Pediatric myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) comprise less than 5% of childhood malignancies. Approximately 30% to 45% of pediatric MDS cases are associated with an underlying genetic predisposition syndrome. A subset of patients present with MDS/acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following intensive chemotherapy for an unrelated malignancy. A definitive diagnosis of MDS can often only be rendered pending a comprehensive clinical and laboratory-based evaluation, which frequently includes ancillary testing in a reference laboratory. Clinical subtypes, the current diagnostic schema, and the results of more recently performed next-generation sequencing studies in pediatric MDS are discussed here.

Azacitidine (AZA) is important in the management of patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Romidepsin (ROM) is a histone deacetylase inhibitor which synergises with AZA in vitro. The ROMAZA trial established the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of combined ROM/AZA therapy in patients with AML, as ROM 12 mg/m2 on Days 8 and 15, with AZA 75 mg/m2 administered for 7/28 day cycle. Nine of the 38 (23·7%) patients treated at the MTD were classified as responders by Cycle 6 (best response: complete remission [CR]/incomplete CR n = 7, partial response n = 2). Correlative next-generation sequencing studies demonstrated important insights into therapy resistance.

BackgroundAcute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease where outcome is substantially influenced by age. Over the last 30-40 years, significant improvements have been made in survival for younger patients (those under 60). However, with the median age of the disease at diagnosis at 65 years, outcome in older patients has improved much less. Additionally, many elderly patients are not considered suitable for intensive chemotherapy and the current standard treatment is considered unsatisfactory. MethodsLI1 will evaluate several relevant therapeutic questions in AML patients over 60 years of age for whom intensive chemotherapy is not considered suitable. Patients are invited to enter a randomized comparison of standard therapy (LD Ara-C) versus a novel treatment. A number of different treatment options are available at any one time, but there is no comparison between novel agents. If, at initial review, a novel agent is deemed unlikely to demonstrate the required improvement, it may be removed from the protocol and replaced with another novel agent, via protocol amendment. Agents are initially entered into a phase II comparison against standard of care - where an agent is considered promising at interim review (based on remission rates), the randomisation may be extended to a fully powered phase III comparison based on survival. Agents which may prolong survival or improve remission rates will also be required to demonstrate equivalence or better of quality of life in patients – therefore, quality of life assessments are undertaken throughout, in each arm. DiscussionEven when less intensive treatment options are delivered, the outcomes are not satisfactory. The NCRI AML working group has a strong network, required for delivery of this trial program. The UK network is augmented by international collaborative groups, most notably from New Zealand and Denmark. The use of the Pick-a-Winner design improves efficiency and speed of review of the available novel agents with the aim of benefitting the increasing number of patients in this age group.Trial registration: ISCRTN40571019, EUDRACT2011-000479-19 (12th May 2011)

Proper management of chemotherapy-related gastrointestinal toxicities is essential to maximize therapeutic outcome for malignancies. Gastroparesis is characterized by delayed gastric emptying without gastrointestinal obstruction. Although it has not been well recognized as a complication of chemotherapy for solid malignancies, we here report a case of gastroparesis apparently due to neurotoxicity of high-intensity taxane- and platinum-based chemotherapy for a solid tumor. The patient experienced late-onset gastric dysmotility as evidenced by an abnormally dilated stomach even after cessation of feeding for several days. The gastroparesis was successfully controlled with a 5-HT4 receptor agonist, resulting in recovery of gastric motility and allowing completion of curative anticancer treatment. Despite its rarity in patients with solid cancers, gastroparesis should be recognized as a potential cause of persistent upper abdominal symptoms during neurotoxic chemotherapy in such individuals, given that a delay in its management may be detrimental to survival outcome.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a life-threatening malignancy that is more prevalent in the elderly. Because the patient population is heterogenous and advanced in age, choosing the optimal therapy can be challenging. There is strong evidence supporting antileukemic therapy, including standard intensive induction chemotherapy (IC) and non-intensive chemotherapy (NIC), for older patients with AML, and guidelines recommend treatment selection based on a patient’s individual and disease characteristics as opposed to age alone. Nonetheless, historic evidence indicates that a high proportion of patients who may be candidates for NIC receive no active antileukemic treatment (NAAT), instead receiving only best supportive care (BSC). We conducted a focused literature review to assess current real-world patterns of undertreatment in AML. From a total of 25 identified studies reporting the proportion of patients with AML receiving NAAT, the proportion of patients treated with NAAT varied widely, ranging from 10 to 61.4% in the US and 24.1 to 35% in Europe. Characteristics associated with receipt of NAAT included clinical factors such as age, poor performance status, comorbidities, and uncontrolled concomitant conditions, as well as sociodemographic factors such as female sex, unmarried status, and lower income. Survival was diminished among patients receiving NAAT, with reported median overall survival values ranging from 1.2 to 4.8 months compared to 5 to 14.4 months with NIC. These findings suggest a proportion of patients who are candidates for NIC receive NAAT, potentially forfeiting the survival benefit of active antileukemic treatment.

FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia accounts for around 30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The mutation carried a poor prognosis until the rise of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). New potent and specific inhibitors have successfully altered the course of the disease, increasing the complete response rate and the survival of patients with FLT3-mutated AML. The aim of this article is to review all the current knowledge on these game-changing drugs as well as the unsolved issues raised by their use for fit and unfit FLT3-mutated AML patients. To this end, we analyzed the results of phase I, II, III clinical trials evaluating FLT3-TKI both in the first-line, relapse monotherapy or in combination referenced in the PubMed, the American Society of Hematology, the European Hematology Association, and the Clinicaltrials.gov databases, as well as basic science reports on TKI resistance from the same databases. The review follows a chronological presentation of the different trials that allowed the development of first- and second-generation TKI and ends with a review of the current lines of evidence on leukemic blasts resistance mechanisms that allow them to escape TKI.

Purpose Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) data from the Middle East are limited to single-center studies. We report leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) of young (≤70 years) patients with AML treated in Kuwait. Patients and Methods This study investigated prognostic markers among 172 young and fit patients with de novo nonacute promyelocytic leukemia AML treated with intensive induction protocols from a tertiary cancer center. Results The median age was 44 years (interquartile range, 32-51) and 67% of cases were Arab. A greater proportion of males was found in the 2017 European Leukemia Net-defined unfavorable-risk group (20% vs 9%, respectively; P = .02). Most patients (94%) were treated by a standard 7 × 3 regimen; 72.5% of cases achieved complete remission. The 24-month LFS was 44% (95% confidence interval, 30-65), 36% (95% confidence interval, 26-50), and 23% (95% confidence interval, 10-53) for the favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk groups, respectively (P = .018). The 24-month OS was 70% (95% confidence interval, 60-90), 65% (95% confidence interval, 53-79), and 49% (95% confidence interval, 31-78), respectively (P = .05). Multivariable factor analysis identified male gender (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; P = .029) and older age (HR, 1.02; P = .05) with poor LFS outcome, whereas favorable-risk classification predicated better outcome (HR, 0.49; P = .03). Favorable-risk classification was the only predictor of OS (HR, 0.39; P = .029). Conclusion Fit patients with AML in the favorable-risk group treated with intensive chemotherapy fare well, whereas patients in the adverse-risk group have poor survival.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive malignancy that requires rapid treatment with chemotherapies to reduce tumor burden. However, these chemotherapies can compromise lymphocyte function, thereby hindering normal anti-tumor immune responses and likely limiting the efficacy of subsequent immunotherapy. To better understand these negative impacts, we assessed the immunological effects of standard-of-care AML therapies on lymphocyte phenotype and function over time. When compared to healthy donors, untreated AML patients showed evidence of lymphocyte activation and exhaustion and had more prevalent CD57+NKG2C+ adaptive NK cells, which was independent of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) status. HMA/venetoclax treatment resulted in a greater fraction of T cells with effector memory phenotype, inhibited IFN-γ secretion by CD8+ T cells, upregulated perforin expression in NK cells, downregulated PD-1 and 2B4 expression on CD4+ T cells, and stimulated Treg proliferation and CTLA-4 expression. Additionally, we showed increased expression of perforin and CD39 and enhanced IFN-γ production by T cells from pre-treatment blood samples of venetoclax-resistant AML patients. Our results provide insight into the lymphocyte status in previously untreated AML patients and the effects of standard-of-care treatments on their biology and functions. We also found novel pre-treatment characteristics of T cells that could potentially predict venetoclax resistance.

Less-intensive induction therapies are increasingly used in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Using an AML composite model (AML-CM) assigning higher scores to older age, increased comorbidity burdens, and adverse cytogenetic risks, we defined 3 distinct prognostic groups and compared outcomes after less-intensive vs intensive induction therapies in a multicenter retrospective cohort (n = 1292) treated at 6 institutions from 2008 to 2012 and a prospective cohort (n = 695) treated at 13 institutions from 2013 to 2017. Prospective study included impacts of Karnofsky performance status (KPS), quality of life (QOL), and physician perception of cure. In the retrospective cohort, recipients of less-intensive therapies were older and had more comorbidities, more adverse cytogenetics, and worse KPS. Less-intensive therapies were associated with higher risks of mortality in AML-CM scores of 4 to 6, 7 to 9, and ≥10. Results were independent of allogeneic transplantation and similar in those age 70 to 79 years. In the prospective cohort, the 2 groups were similar in baseline QOL, geriatric assessment, and patient outcome preferences. Higher mortality risks were seen after less-intensive therapies. However, in models adjusted for age, physician-assigned KPS, and chance of cure, mortality risks and QOL were similar. Less-intensive therapy recipients had shorter length of hospitalization (LOH). Our study questions the survival and QOL benefits (except LOH) of less-intensive therapies in patients with AML, including those age 70 to 79 years or with high comorbidity burdens. A randomized trial in older/medically infirm patients is required to better assess the value of less-intensive and intensive therapies or their combination. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01929408.

International audience; In contrast to Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), the influence of FLT3 ligand (FLT3L) on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) biology and disease prognosis has been poorly described. Here we provide an overview of the role played by FLT3L in AML. While being a cytokine implicated in the regulation of hematopoiesis, both in normal situation and after intensive chemotherapy, FLT3L has also a role in enhancing proliferation, inhibiting apoptosis and conferring resistance to FLT3 inhibitors in AML. Moreover, recent independent data show how its measurement may be helpful in the disease management. Indeed, FLT3L could provide a low cost, rapid and noninvasive assessment of chemosensitivity and blast clearance that has robust prognostic significance for patients with AML.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis and high rates of relapse, especially in elderly patients who are ineligible to receive intensive chemotherapy. Venetoclax, an oral BCL-2 inhibitor, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration in combination with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine in newly-diagnosed AML patients who are ineligible to receive intensive chemotherapy. Confirmatory phase III VIALE-A and VIALE-C trials showed a composite complete remission rate of 66.4% and 48%, respectively. Thus, further validating venetoclax as an attractive therapeutic option in the AML treatment landscape.A review of venetoclax in AML, focusing on preclinical and clinical data, toxicity profile, and mechanisms of resistance; and its strengths and weaknesses in regards to its current and future role in AML treatment is discussed. To find relevant studies, authors searched PubMed/Medline and ClinicalTrials.gov.The introduction of venetoclax-based combination therapies has greatly expanded the therapeutic options for elderly and chemotherapy-ineligible AML patients. Additional studies with extended follow-up are necessary to address remaining open questions such as (I) durability of responses, (II) head-to-head comparisons with intensive chemotherapy in selected patients (e.g.

The primary objective of this work was to determine the feasibility of a randomized trial of individualized yoga for children receiving intensive chemotherapy and for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients outside of the principal coordinating institution. We evaluated the feasibility of a randomized trial of individualized yoga versus an iPad control program at a site where external yoga instructors were hired and compensated per session. Subjects were children receiving intensive chemotherapy for hematological malignancies and autologous or allogeneic HSCT recipients expected to be hospitalized for 3 weeks. Yoga or iPad control contact occurred daily for 21 days (excluding weekends and holidays); fatigue and quality-of-life outcomes were measured at baseline, day 10, and day 21. Ten eligible subjects were identified; six subjects consented and were enrolled. Three were randomized to the individualized yoga intervention and three to the iPad control program. The median age of participants was 12 (range 8–15) years, and 2 (33%) were boys. Challenges primarily related to the hiring of yoga instructors who were not trained in research methods. We found issues with: (1) logistics of hiring, training, and retaining instructors; (2) communication between teams; (3) fidelity to the protocol and outcome assessments; and (4) ensuring safety. We found that a randomized trial of individualized yoga presented new challenges when relying on externally contracted yoga instructors. Future multicenter studies of yoga should seek to better integrate practitioners within the research team to improve processes, communication, fidelity to the protocol, and safety.

Prognostic impact; Mutation; Acute myeloid leukemia Impacte pronòstic; Mutació; Leucèmia mieloide aguda Impacto pronóstico; Mutación; Leucemia mieloide aguda The negative prognostic impact of internal tandem duplication of FLT3 (FLT3-ITD) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia with mutated NPM1 (AML-NPM1) is restricted to those with a higher FLT3-ITD allelic ratio (FLT3high; ≥0.5) and considered negligible in those with a wild-type (FLT3WT)/low ITD ratio (FLT3low). Because the comutation of DNMT3A (DNMT3Amut) has been suggested to negatively influence prognosis in AML-NPM1, we analyzed the impact of DNMT3Amut in FLT3-ITD subsets (absent, low, and high ratios). A total of 164 patients diagnosed with AML-NPM1 included in 2 consecutive CETLAM protocols and with DNMT3A and FLT3 status available were studied. Overall, DNMT3Amut status did not have a prognostic impact, with comparable overall survival (P = .2). Prognostic stratification established by FLT3-ITD (FLT3WT = FLT3low > FLT3high) was independent of DNMT3Amut status. Measurable residual disease (MRD) based on NPM1 quantitative polymerase chain reaction was available for 94 patients. DNMT3Amut was associated with a higher number of mutated NPM1 transcripts after induction (P = .012) and first consolidation (C1; P < .001). All DNMT3Amut patients were MRD+ after C1 (P < .001) and exhibited significant MRD persistence after C2 and C3 (MRD+ vs MRD−; P = .027 and P = .001, respectively). Finally, DNMT3Amut patients exhibited a trend toward greater risk of molecular relapse (P = .054). In conclusion, DNMT3Amut did not modify the overall prognosis exerted by FLT3-ITD in AML-NPM1 despite delayed MRD clearance, possibly because of MRD-driven preemptive intervention. This work was supported in part by the Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant-Pau) and the José Carreras Leukemia Research Institute as well as grants from the Catalan Government (PERIS SLT002/16/0043 and AGAUR 2017 SGR 139) and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain (PI17/01246, PI20/01621 and CM20/00061).

The era of precision medicine for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has arrived, and it is extremely important to detect actionable mutations relevant to treatment-related decision-making. However, the percentage of actionable mutations found in AML is approximately 50% at present, and therapeutic development is also needed for AML patients without such mutations. Nevertheless, recently approved drugs for AML treatment are less toxic than conventional intensive chemotherapy and can be combined with low-intensity treatments. Such combination therapies can improve prognosis, especially for elderly AML patients, who account for more than half of all AML cases. Thus, the treatment strategy for leukemia is changing drastically and showing rapid progress. In this review, we present novel mitochondria-associated molecular target therapies for AML, such as the use of BCL-2 and IDH inhibitors.