Public education for children is one of the few institutions in which citizens have opportunities to access affordable information and tools needed to survive. These years of a person's life bear great weight on the stage that is set for them and for the society they will function in as adults. It is imperative that they receive this information in a way that can be retained and accessed throughout the lifespan. Of course, life's messiness and unpredictability shapes how each person ultimately comes to learning what they learn. For these reasons, the educators that contribute to the shaping of such learning must be informed on the institution their line of work originated from, where it stands, and where it can go to best enhance their performance. By doing so, it can only enhance the learning of students, and consequently strengthen the fabric of society they in turn go into. Some of the most pervasive elements in the world of education is the risk of burnout and the potential for compassion fatigue (CF). "Burnout", for the purposes of this discussion, will be defined as the following: the physical, mental, and/or emotional state of exhaustion that results from prolonged stress (Brown, 2021). Brown (2021) also explains that CF, comparatively, is a kind of stress that results from caring or otherwise working with traumatized individuals and/or within traumatic settings. While CF is a concept that has been discussed in other lines of work that involve care, such as nursing, discussion of CF within the world of academia is relatively minimal. Regardless of how these symptoms emerge, they will likely negatively impact the amount of attrition in the workplace, including in the field of Special Education (SPED) which in turn can affect the quality of education our most at-risk students receive (Park & Shin, 2020). This in turn can add to the cocktail of influences that result in important experiences, such as interpersonal relationships, occupational mobility, mental health, financial states of being, and the perpetuation of systemic class divides (Gandara & Hopkins, 2010). There is additional risk with CF in the workplace, as some consequences of it can contribute to organizational complications, such as low morale, higher rates of turnover, and short-staffing (Sawchuk, 2022). In the world of academia, CF can contribute to the growth of achievement gaps and disproportionality in special education (Anderson, 2020). With the risk of such immediate and long-term consequences, CF is something that deserves more understanding and management, including from its earlier stages in the debut of modern education (from the 1970's) to the era of the post-pandemic world of education (today). This results in gaining more awareness of where the designs of modern education is at greatest risk for fostering CF amongst educators. From there, CF is analyzed, from its emergence, to its symptomology, to its immediate consequences over the course of an educator's tenure. Discussion of ways to support educators from a "top-down" approach, including professional development from administrators, superiors, and local/federal government are analyzed and recommended to pair with "bottom-up" approaches for educator support, such as the support individuals can provide themselves and for their colleagues. The importance of reviewing, understanding, and managing CF in education is also analyzed for future implications, including those pertaining to occupational equity, stronger mental health resilience, and positive societal change. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]