Search

Introduction: Emicizumab (Hemlibra®) recently became available and requires an adaptation for managing bleeding, suspected bleeding and emergency or scheduled invasive procedures in haemophilia A patients with inhibitor. This implicates a multidisciplinary approach and redaction of recommendations for care that must be regularly adapted to the available data. Aim: The following text aims to provide a guide for the management of people with haemophilia A with inhibitor treated with emicizumab in case of bleeding or invasives procedures. Methods: The French network on inherited bleeding disorders (MHEMO), the French Reference Centre on Haemophilia (CRH), in collaboration with the French Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP) have been working together to make proposals for the management of these situations. Results: Haemostatic treatment and other medications should be given stepwise, according to the severity and location of the bleeding or the risk of bleeding of the procedure as well as the haemostatic response obtained at each step in order to ensure an optimal benefit/risk ratio. Conclusion: The lack of data means that it is only possible to issue proposals rather than recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The organization of health care establishments and perioperative care are essential for ensuring the quality of care and safety of patients undergoing outpatient surgery. In order to correctly inventory these organizations and practices, in 2013–2014, the French society of anaesthesia and intensive care organized an extensive practical survey in French ambulatory surgery units entitled the “OPERA” study ( Organisation periopératoire de l’anesthésie en chirurgie ambulatoire ). From among all of the ambulatory surgery centres listed by the Agences régionales de santé (Regional health agencies, France), 206 public and private centres were randomly selected. A structural (typology, organization) survey and a medical-practice survey (focusing on the management of postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting as well as the prevention of venous thromboembolism) were collected and managed by a prospective audit of practices occurring on two randomly selected days. The latter was further accompanied by an additional audit specifically focussing on ten representative procedures: (1) stomatology surgery (third molar removal); (2) knee arthroscopy; (3) surgery of the abdominal wall (including inguinal hernia); (4) perianal surgery; (5) varicose vein surgery; (6) digestive laparoscopy–cholecystectomy; (7) breast surgery (tumourectomy); (8) uterine surgery; (9) hallux valgus and (10) hand surgery (excluding carpal tunnel). Over the 2 days of observation, 7382 patients were included comprising 2174 patients who underwent one of the procedures from the above list. The analysis of these data will provide an overview of the organization of health establishments, the modalities thus supported and compliance with standards. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute neuropathic pain can occur in the postoperative period but any link with persistent post-surgical neuropathic pain remains unclear.Objectives: The objectives of this study were to prospectively describe the incidence of acute post-surgical neuropathic pain in a large population using the DN4 (clinician administered) questionnaire and to confirm the hypothetical link between acute and persistent neuropathic pain at 2 months after surgery in a large population using the DN2 (self administered) questionnaire.Design: A multi-centre, prospective and observational trial.Setting: Two consecutive days in 27 hospitals in France.Patients: Six hundred and eight patients undergoing 13 different types of surgery. Fifteen patients were excluded as data were incomplete, and 229 (38.6%) and 260 (43.8%) were not contactable for assessment at 1 and 2 months after surgery, respectively.Main Outcome Measures: Pain was evaluated at least 2 h postoperatively on the same day (D0),on the second day (D2) and at 1 and 2 months after surgery (M1 and M2). Pain was assessed using a 10-point Numeric Rating Scale. If the Numeric Rating Scale score was greater than 0, neuropathic pain was assessed using a DN4 (clinician administered) questionnaire or using a DN2 (self-administered) questionnaire. Acute and persistent postsurgical neuropathic pain (PPSNP) were defined respectively by a DN4 score at least 4/10 on day 0 and/or day 2 and a DN2 score at least 3/7 at 2 months after surgery.Results: Of the 593 patients included, 41.2% were in pain before surgery and 8.2% described neuropathic pain. Early after surgery, the majority of the 593 patients (72.2% on the day of surgery and 71.3% on day 2) experienced acute pain. It was neuropathic in nature in 5.6% of patients (95% CI, 3.6 to 8.3) on the day of surgery and 12.9% (95% CI, 9.7 to 16.7) on day 2. Two months after surgery, PPSNP was present in 33.3% of the 333 patients assessed. Multivariate analysis showed that a DN4 score at least 4/10 on the day of surgery or on day 2 was a significant risk factor for PPSNP [odds ratios 4.22 (95% CI, 2.19 to 8.12)].Conclusion: Our results suggest that early acute postsurgical neuropathic pain significantly increases the risk of persistent post-surgical neuropathic pain.Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NTC NCT02826317. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The use of prothrombin complex concentrates and the role of plasma concentration of anticoagulants in the management of bleeding in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants are still debated. Our aim was to describe management strategies and outcomes of severe bleeding events in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants.Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study of 732 patients treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban hospitalized for severe bleeding, included prospectively in the registry from June 2013 to November 2015.Results: Bleeding was gastrointestinal or intracranial in 37% (212 of 732) and 24% (141 of 732) of the cases, respectively. Creatinine clearance was lower than 60 ml/min in 61% (449 of 732) of the cases. The plasma concentration of direct oral anticoagulants was determined in 62% (452 of 732) of the cases and was lower than 50 ng/ml or higher than 400 ng/ml in 9.2% (41 of 452) and in 6.6% (30 of 452) of the cases, respectively. Activated or nonactivated prothrombin complex concentrates were administered in 38% of the cases (281 of 732). Mortality by day 30 was 14% (95% CI, 11 to 16).Conclusions: Management of severe bleeding in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants appears to be complex. The use of prothrombin complex concentrates differs depending on bleeding sites and direct oral anticoagulant plasma concentrations. Mortality differs according to bleeding sites and was similar to previous estimates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Sang Thrombose Vaisseaux is the property of John Libbey Eurotext Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: There has been a growing interest in continuous local anaesthetic wound infiltration as a non-opioid technique for postoperative pain relief. The impact of this modality on baseline analgesia after spinal fusion surgery has however been inconclusive. We tested whether continuous wound infiltration with ropivacaine can enhance postoperative analgesia compared to a baseline intravenous multimodal analgesia protocol after spinal fusion surgery.Methods: In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, a multiholed 19-gauge catheter was placed at the end of the surgical procedure through the wound to permit the continuous administration (8 ml/h) of ropivacaine 0.2 % (ropivacaine group; n = 19 patients) or saline (control group; n = 20 patients) during the first 48 postoperative hours (H48). Both groups received intraoperative low-dose ketamine, a combination of acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and nefopam over the same postoperative period, and morphine delivered by a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device.Results: Morphine consumption was comparable between the two groups both at H48, 38 mg (26:52) (median, 25th:75th percentile) (control group) versus 43 mg (19:74) (ropivacaine group), and at H24, 18 mg (16:22) versus 22 mg (9:35) respectively. Pain scores at rest and during mobilization, quality of postoperative sleep, and morphine-related side effects were comparable between the two groups at H24 and H48.Conclusion: Our findings indicate that no additional analgesia was provided with continuous wound infiltration of ropivacaine compared to a baseline intravenous multimodal analgesia protocol after spinal fusion surgery.Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01743794. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since 2011, data on patients exposed to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAs) while undergoing invasive procedures have accumulated. At the same time, an increased hemorrhagic risk during perioperative bridging anticoagulation without thrombotic risk reduction has been demonstrated. This has led the GIHP to update their guidelines published in 2011. For scheduled procedures at low bleeding risk, it is suggested that patients interrupt DOAs the night before irrespective of type of drug and to resume therapy six hours or more after the end of the invasive procedure. For invasive procedures at high bleeding risk, it is suggested to interrupt rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban three days before. Dabigatran should be interrupted according to the renal function, four days and five days if creatinine clearance is higher than 50 mL/min and between 30 and 50 mL/min, respectively. For invasive procedures at very high bleeding risk such as intracranial neurosurgery or neuraxial anesthesia, longer interruption times are suggested. Finally, bridging with parenteral anticoagulation and measurement of DOA concentrations can no longer routinely be used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]