Search

Background: Because nearly 23,000 more neurosurgeons are needed globally to address 5 million essential neurosurgical cases that go untreated each year, there is an increasing interest in task-shifting and task-sharing (TS/S), delegating neurosurgical tasks to nonspecialists, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This global survey aimed to provide a cross-sectional understanding of the prevalence and structure of current neurosurgical TS/S practices in LMICs. Methods: The survey was distributed to a convenience sample of individuals providing neurosurgical care in LMICs with a Web-based survey link via electronic mailing lists of continental societies and various neurosurgical groups, conference announcements, e-mailing lists, and social media platforms. Country-level data were analyzed by descriptive statistics. Results: The survey yielded 127 responses from 47 LMICs; 20 countries (42.6%) reported ongoing TS/S. Most TS/S procedures involved emergency interventions, the top 3 being burr holes, craniotomy for hematoma evacuation, and external ventricular drain. Most (65.0%) believed that their Ministry of Health does not endorse TS/S (24.0% unsure), and only 11% believed that TS/S training was structured. There were few opportunities for TS/S providers to continue medical education (11.6%) or maintenance of certification (9.4%, or receive remuneration (4.2%). Conclusions: TS/S is ongoing in many LMICs without substantial structure or oversight, which is concerning for patient safety. These data invite future clinical outcomes studies to assess effectiveness and discussions on policy recommendations such as standardized curricula, certification protocols, specialist oversight, and referral networks to increase the level of TS/S care and to continue to increase the specialist workforce. Key words: Capacity, Global health, Global neurosurgery, LMIC, Task-sharing, Task-shifting, Workforce

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) accounts for a significant amount of death and disability worldwide and the majority of this burden affects individuals in low-and-middle income countries. The GNOS is a multi-centre international, prospective cohort study. This study is the first global neurosurgical study that aims to provide a comprehensive picture of the management and outcomes of patients undergoing emergency surgery for TBI worldwide.

OBJECTIVENeurosurgical training is usually based on traditional sources of education, such as papers, books, direct surgical experience, and cadaveric hands-on courses. In low-middle income countries, standard education programs are often unavailable, mainly owing to the lack of human and economic resources. Introducing digital platforms in these settings could be an alternative solution for bridging the gap between Western and poor countries in neurosurgical knowledge.METHODSThe authors identified from the Internet the main digital platforms that could easily be adopted in low-middle income countries. They selected free/low-cost mobile content with high educational impact.RESULTSThe platforms that were identified as fulfilling the characteristics described above are WFNS Young Neurosurgeons Forum Stream, Brainbook, NeuroMind, UpSurgeOn, The Neurosurgical Atlas, Touch surgery, The 100 UCLA Subjects in Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Survival Guide, EANS (European Association of Neurosurgical Societies) Academy, Neurosurgical.TV, 3D Neuroanatomy, The Rhoton Collection, and Hinari. These platforms consist of webinars, 3D interactive neuroanatomy and neurosurgery content, videos, and e-learning programs supported by neurosurgical associations or journals.CONCLUSIONSDigital education is an emerging tool for contributing to the spread of information in the neurosurgical community. The continuous improvement in the quality of content will rapidly increase the scientific validity of digital programs. In conclusion, the fast and easy access to digital resources could contribute to promote neurosurgical education in countries with limited facilities.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide. Surgical intervention is one of the main pillars of TBI management. The mainstay of treatment for substantial intracranial hematomas is surgical evacuation. In addition, patients with TBI may have brain swelling and increased intracranial pressure. If the latter is refractory to medical management, surgical interventions can be helpful. In this review we seek to outline the major tenets of the surgical management of TBI.

Background Public engagement has become one of the most effective tools in gaining feedback and perspectives from members of the public, involving patients with decisions, and inspiring young people to carry the medical profession forwards. Brainbook is a multi-platform, social media-based resource that was created specifically to enhance public engagement in neurosurgery and results from one of its case discussions will be reported in this paper. Methods A Brainbook case was created in collaboration with the NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma and presented over 3 days (23–25 February 2018). YouTube videos were created depicting the management of an acute subdural haematoma using patient interviews, medical illustration, consultant-led discussion and operative footage. Content was shared across all Brainbook social media platforms and analytics were gathered through social media applications. Results Over a 72-hour time period, and across multiple social media accounts, 101,418 impressions were achieved (defined as penetrance onto individual media feeds and total views of the content), with active discussion on social media. Conclusions Neurosurgical content published across multiple social media outlets represents an encouraging and exciting potential for global engagement across multiple audiences. Social media can be an effective method of not only disseminating neurosurgical knowledge, but activating and engaging the public, allied healthcare professionals, medical students and neurosurgeons. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-018-3757-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Esta revisión describe la base de evidencia que ha ayudado a definir el papel de la craniectomía descompresiva (CD) en la manejo de pacientes con traumatismo craneoencefálico (TBI). Hallazgos recientes La publicación de dos ensayos aleatorizados (DECRA y RESCUEicp) ha fortalecido la base de pruebas. Los El ensayo DECRA mostró que la CD bifrontal neuroprotectora para la hipertensión intracraneal moderada no es útil, mientras que la El ensayo RESCUEicp encontró que la CD de último nivel para la hipertensión intracraneal severa y refractaria puede reducir significativamente la mortalidad tasa, pero se asocia con una tasa más alta de discapacidad. Estos hallazgos han reabierto el debate sobre (1) las indicaciones de la CD en varios subtipos de LCT, (2) técnicas alternativas (por ejemplo, craneotomía con bisagra), (3) tiempo y material óptimos para la reconstrucción craneal, y (4) el papel de la toma de decisiones compartida en la atención de TBI. Además, el papel de la CD primaria al evacuar un subdural agudo El hematoma se encuentra actualmente en evaluación en el contexto del ensayo aleatorizado RESCUE-ASDH. Esta revisión proporciona una descripción general de la base de evidencia actual, analiza sus limitaciones y presenta una perspectiva sobre el papel de la CD, ya que existe un creciente reconocimiento de que la atención también debe centrarse en los ingresos bajos y medios países debido a su carga de LCT mucho mayor. This review describes the evidence base that has helped define the role of decompressive craniectomy (DC) in the management of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Recent Findings The publication of two randomized trials (DECRA and RESCUEicp) has strengthened the evidence base. The DECRA trial showed that neuroprotective bifrontal DC for moderate intracranial hypertension is not helpful, whereas the RESCUEicp trial found that last-tier DC for severe and refractory intracranial hypertension can significantly reduce the mortality rate but is associated with a higher rate of disability. These findings have reopened the debate about (1) the indications for DC in various TBI subtypes, (2) alternative techniques (e.g., hinge craniotomy), (3) optimal time and material for cranial reconstruction, and (4) the role of shared decision-making in TBI care. Additionally, the role of primary DC when evacuating an acute subdural hematoma is currently undergoing evaluation in the context of the RESCUE-ASDH randomized trial. This review provides an overview of the current evidence base, discusses its limitations, and presents a global perspective on the role of DC, as there is growing recognition that attention should also focus on low- and middle-income countries due to their much greater TBI burden.

Even though, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are facing a far greater traumatic brain injury (TBI) burden compared to high-income countries (HICs), agency funding and multi-centre research efforts have had a disproportionately greater focus on HICs.1 Initiatives, such as InTBIR,2 are advancing TBI care in HICs but the participation of LMICs has been very limited. Additionally, multicentre trials in TBI, with very few exceptions, have predominantly focused on HIC populations., NIHR Global Heath Research

Objective: Recently, a concept of an individually targeted level of cerebral perfusion pressure that aims to restore impaired cerebral vasoreactivity has been advocated after traumatic brain injury. The relationship between cerebral perfusion pressure and pressure reactivity index normally is supposed to have a U-shape with its minimum interpreted as the value of "optimal" cerebral perfusion pressure. The aim of this study is to investigate the relation between the absence of the optimal cerebral perfusion pressure curve and physiological variables, clinical factors, and interventions.Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.Setting: Neurocritical care units in two university centers.Patients: Between May 2012 and December 2013, a total of 48 traumatic brain injury patients were studied with real-time annotation of predefined clinical events. Interventions: None.Measurements and Main Results: All patients had continuous monitoring of arterial blood pressure, intracranial pressure, and cerebral perfusion pressure, with real-time calculations of pressure reactivity index and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure using ICM+ software (Cambridge Enterprise, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK). Selected clinical events were inserted on a daily basis, including changes in physiological variables, sedativeanalgesic drugs, vasoactive drugs, and medical/surgical therapies for intracranial hypertension. The collected data were divided into 4-hour periods, with the primary outcome being absence of the optimal cerebral perfusion pressure curve. For every period, mean values (+/- sds) of arterial blood pressure, intracranial pressure, pressure reactivity index, and other physiological variables were calculated; clinical events were organized using predefined scales. In 28% of all 1,561 periods, an optimal cerebral perfusion pressure curve was absent. A generalized linear mixed model with binary logistic regression was fitted. Absence of slow arterial blood pressure waves (odds ratio, 2.7; p Conclusions: This study identified six factors that were independently associated with absence of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure curves.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains the commonest cause of death and disability amongst people under the age of 40. Advances in neuro-imaging and neuro-intensive care during the 1980s and 1990s, improved pre-hospital care and the development of major trauma centres in more recent years, have all contributed to the provision of better care and improved outcomes for head-injured patients [1]. Here we explore the latest developments in the surgical management of TBI (Table 1).

Objectives External ventricular drain (EVD) insertion is a common neurosurgical procedure. EVD-related infection (ERI) is a major complication that can lead to morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aimed to establish a national ERI rate in the UK and Ireland and determine key factors influencing the infection risk.\ud \ud \ud Methods A prospective multicentre cohort study of EVD insertions in 21 neurosurgical units was performed over 6 months. The primary outcome measure was 30-day ERI. A Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis to calculate HR.\ud \ud \ud Results A total of 495 EVD catheters were inserted into 452 patients with EVDs remaining in situ for 4700 days (median 8 days; IQR 4–13). Of the catheters inserted, 188 (38%) were antibiotic-impregnated, 161 (32.5%) were plain and 146 (29.5%) were silver-bearing. A total of 46 ERIs occurred giving an infection risk of 9.3%. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that factors independently associated with increased infection risk included duration of EVD placement for ≥8 days (HR=2.47 (1.12–5.45); p=0.03), regular sampling (daily sampling (HR=4.73 (1.28–17.42), p=0.02) and alternate day sampling (HR=5.28 (2.25–12.38); p

Editor—We read with interest the editorial by Dr Lönnqvist entitled “Medical Research and the Ethics of Medical Treatments: Disability-free Survival”.1 The editorial refers to our study, RESCUEicp, that interrogated the effect of secondary decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with refractory intracranial hypertension.2 The editorial states ‘the conclusion to draw is instead that, despite reducing overall mortality, surgery is not associated with any true long-term benefits in this setting; it only increases the number of patients in a vegetative state or suffering serious disability, and should therefore not be used’. We have major concerns about this statement with reference to our study, and with the wider premise that underpins the editorial, and we will address each of these in turn., The RESCUEicp and RESCUE-ASDH projects were funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR; EME 09/800/16 and HTA 12/35/57 respectively).

Summary The quality of clinical research in surgery has long attracted criticism. High-quality randomised trials have proved difficult to undertake in surgery, and many surgical treatments have therefore been adopted without adequate supporting evidence of efficacy and safety. This evidence deficit can adversely affect research funding and reimbursement decisions, lead to slow adoption of innovations, and permit widespread adoption of procedures that offer no benefit, or cause harm. Improvement in the quality of surgical evidence would therefore be valuable. The Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long-term Follow-up (IDEAL) Framework and Recommendations specify desirable qualities for surgical studies, and outline an integrated evaluation pathway for surgery, and similar complex interventions. We used the IDEAL Recommendations to assess methodological progress in surgical research over time, assessed the uptake and influence of IDEAL, and identified the challenges to further methodological progress. Comparing studies from the periods 2000–04 and 2010–14, we noted apparent improvement in the use of standard outcome measures, adoption of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) standards, and assessment of the quality of surgery and of learning curves, but no progress in the use of qualitative research or reporting of modifications during procedure development. Better education about research, integration of rigorous evaluation into routine practice and training, and linkage of such work to awards systems could foster further improvements in surgical evidence. IDEAL has probably contributed only slightly to the improvements described to date, but its uptake is accelerating rapidly. The need for the integrated evaluation template IDEAL offers for surgery and other complex treatments is becoming more widely accepted.

INTRODUCTION: Decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction is known to reduce mortality. However, there are on-going concerns in terms of the quality of life in survivors. We aimed to examine the correlation between patient and physician reported outcome measures in decompressive hemicraniectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed outcomes in 21 patients who underwent decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant MCA infarction between September 2003 and August 2013 within a regional health system. Patient and physician reported outcome measures were collected at follow-up. These were Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) Version 3, modified Rankin Scale (mRS), National Hospital Seizure Severity Scale, Headache Impact Test and Patient Health Questionnaire for depression. RESULTS: There was a good correlation between physician and patient reported outcome measures. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between mRS and structured SIS Version 3 was -0.887 (p < 0.001); with unstructured SIS results, the correlation coefficient was -0.663 (p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant correlation between life worth and modified Rankin Scale: r = -0.3383 (p = 0.087). DISCUSSION: Our findings of a statistically significant correlation between mRS and SIS have not previously been reported in patients with this condition. These findings provide further information to inform patient and next of kin discussions regarding outcomes from decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant MCA infarction.

Peter Hutchinson is supported by a Research Professorship from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, a European Union Seventh Framework Program grant (CENTER-TBI; grant no. 602150), and the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

OBJECTIVE Symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) will become an increasingly common presentation in neurosurgical practice as the population ages, but quality evidence is still lacking to guide the optimal management for these patients. The British Neurosurgical Trainee Research Collaborative (BNTRC) was established by neurosurgical trainees in 2012 to improve research by combining the efforts of trainees in each of the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland's neurosurgical units (NSUs). The authors present the first study by the BNTRC that describes current management and outcomes for patients with CSDH throughout the UK and Ireland. This provides a resource both for current clinical practice and future clinical research on CSDH. METHODS Data on management and outcomes for patients with CSDH referred to UK and Ireland NSUs were collected prospectively over an 8-month period and audited against criteria predefined from the literature: NSU mortality5%, NSU morbidity10%, symptomatic recurrence within 60 days requiring repeat surgery20%, and unfavorable functional status (modified Rankin Scale score of 4-6) at NSU discharge30%. RESULTS Data from 1205 patients in 26 NSUs were collected. Bur-hole craniostomy was the most common procedure (89%), and symptomatic recurrence requiring repeat surgery within 60 days was observed in 9% of patients. Criteria on mortality (2%), rate of recurrence (9%), and unfavorable functional outcome (22%) were met, but morbidity was greater than expected (14%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that failure to insert a drain intraoperatively independently predicted recurrence and unfavorable functional outcome (p = 0.011 and p = 0.048, respectively). Increasing patient age (p0.00001), postoperative bed rest (p = 0.019), and use of a single bur hole (p = 0.020) independently predicted unfavorable functional outcomes, but prescription of high-flow oxygen or preoperative use of antiplatelet medications did not. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest prospective CSDH study and helps establish national standards. It has confirmed in a real-world setting the effectiveness of placing a subdural drain. This study identified a number of modifiable prognostic factors but questions the necessity of some common aspects of CSDH management, such as enforced postoperative bed rest. Future studies should seek to establish how practitioners can optimize perioperative care of patients with CSDH to reduce morbidity as well as minimize CSDH recurrence. The BNTRC is unique worldwide, conducting multicenter trainee-led research and audits. This study demonstrates that collaborative research networks are powerful tools to interrogate clinical research questions.

Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is a common condition in the elderly neurosurgical population. It is thought to result from a combination of head trauma followed by an inflammatory reaction in the subdural space surrounding the brain. This results in the formation of a progressive encapsulated collection of blood and fluid which compresses underlying brain. Surgical drainage is the mainstay of treatment, and the introduction of subdural drains has significantly reduced CSDH recurrence and the associated morbidity. There is a growing field of research in CSDH aimed at defining the optimal surgical strategies and the role of adjuvant therapies such as steroids.

Object The incidence of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is expected to increase substantially over the next 25 years. Continuing refinement of techniques for surgical evacuation is essential for optimizing patient outcomes. A novel technique involving a hollow screw, which is threaded through a twist-drill hole in the cranium and then connected to a closed drainage system, has been increasing in popularity. The aim of this systematic review is to collate and analyze the published experience with this novel technique and to evaluate its efficacy in comparison with the other surgical treatment methods. Methods This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and has been registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number CRD42013003544). MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for published series involving more than 10 patients treated with these new techniques. Results Nine eligible studies were found (6 case series and 3 case-control studies) comprising 796 patients treated with these new techniques. Pooled analysis showed a “success rate” of 77.6% (95% CI 74.6%–80.4%), recurrence rate of 22.4%, and in-hospital mortality of 1.4%. Conclusions This systematic review adds further evidence to the pool of data assessing the safety and efficacy of the use of this novel, minimally invasive technique for the treatment for CSDH. Overall, twist-drill craniostomy with hollow screws appears to be safe and effective. Class I evidence is necessary to optimize the surgical management of patients with CSDH.

BackgroundInternational guidelines recommend routine hospital admission for all patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) who have injuries on CT brain scan. Only a small proportion of these patients require neurosurgical or critical care intervention. We aimed to develop an accurate clinical decision rule to identify low risk patients safe for discharge from the emergency department (ED) and facilitate earlier referral of those requiring intervention.Method and resultsA retrospective cohort study of case-notes of patients admitted with initial GCS13-15 and injuries identified by CT was completed. Data on a primary outcome measure of clinically important deterioration (indicating need for hospital admission) and secondary outcome of neurosurgery, ICU admission or intubation (indicating need for neurosurgical admission) were collected. Multivariable logistic regression was used to derive models and a risk score predicting deterioration using routinely reported candidate variables identified in a systematic review. We compared the performance of this new risk score with the Brain Injury Guideline (BIG) criteria, derived in the USA.Abstract 049 Figure 1Population selectionAbstract 049 Table 1Model performanceAbstract 049 Table 2Performance of risk score and BIG criteriaConclusions1699 patients were included from 3 English Major Trauma Centres. 27.7% (95% CI: 25.5% to 29.9%) met the primary, and 13.1% (95% CI: 11.6% to 14.8%) met the secondary, outcome of deterioration. The derived clinical decision rule suggests that patients with simple skull fractures or intracranial bleeding less than 5 mm in diameter who are fully conscious could be safely discharged from the Emergency Department. The decision rule achieved a sensitivity of 99.5% (95% CI: 98.1% to 99.9%) and specificity of 7.4% (95% CI: 6% to 9.1%) to the primary outcome. The BIG criteria achieved the same sensitivity but lower specificity (5%).Our empirical models showed good predictive performance and outperformed the BIG criteria. This would potentially allow ED discharge of one in twenty patients currently admitted for observation. However prospective external validation and economic evaluation is required.

ObjectivesReview recruitment progression and statistical analysis plan for Dex-CSDH trial.DesignA UK multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of dexamethasone versus placebo for CSDH.SubjectsSymptomatic, adult CSDH patients admitted to a participating neurosurgical unit.MethodsTrial participants receive a 2 week course of dexamethasone in addition to standard care, including surgery. The primary outcome measure is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 months. An mRS of 0–3 requires the patient to be independently mobile and we have considered this a favourable outcome, with scores 4–6 (non-mobile) as unfavourable. The primary analysis will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis, estimating the absolute difference between the two treatment arms in the proportions achieving a favourable outcome. Secondary analysis will be done with an ordinal analysis of mRS scores and proportional odds logistic regression of the original mRS score adjusting for baseline covariates (age, GCS).Results629/750 patients (84%) have been recruited to the Dex-CSDH trial which is on-going as of 20-06-2018. Recruitment progress and follow-up at time of presentation will be reviewed alongside full statistical analysis plan.ConclusionsThe Dex-CSDH trial is drawing close to target following excellent recruitment across 22 UK centres. Transparent communication of the statistical analysis plan is essential prior to unblinding of the data. Up-to-date recruitment and primary endpoint completion rates will also be reviewed.

Student-selected components (SSCs) are protected periods of time in the undergraduate medical curriculum which allow students to explore an area of medicine they are interested in. They are particularly valuable in exposing students to smaller specialties like neurosurgery, which are often sparsely covered in the rest of the undergraduate curriculum. Moreover, they provide opportunities for students interested in pursuing a career in neurosurgery to increase their likelihood of being successful in specialty training applications. In this article, we summarise our department's experience of hosting SSCs. Furthermore, we have set out to establish a series of achievable objectives over the course of a typical SSC in neurosurgery. This includes the possibility of participation in research and audit, which, if well planned, can be rewarding for both the student and the host unit. SSCs are an effective means of exposing medical students to neurosurgery and provide a multitude of opportunities for enhancing clinical competencies and career development.

Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical disorders and is especially prevalent in old age. The subdural evacuating port system (SEPS) has emerged in the last few years as a minimally invasive alternative to the standard procedure of burr-hole evacuation. NHS practice is evidence-driven and evidence from high-quality clinical studies is required prior to implementation of any changes. In the UK, the National Research Ethics Service (NRES) advises community consultation prior to starting a clinical trial, where the patient is unlikely to have capacity to consent to enrolment in the trial. To prepare for a trial comparing minimally invasive (SEPS) versus burr-hole evacuation for evacuation of a CSDH, we have designed and undertaken a pre-protocol community consultation survey to examine potential patient participation. MATERIAL(S) AND METHODS: The study population consisted of patients, family members and carers/friends in neurosurgical clinic waiting rooms and wards at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, who individually completed a questionnaire (n = 215).Most respondents were willing to participate in the proposed randomised clinical trial (77%; 165/215). Moreover, 80% (171/215) and 74% (159/215) were willing to allow their next of kin and an independent consultant neurosurgeon to give surrogate consent, respectively.The results of our pre-protocol community consultation showed that not only would most respondents be willing to participate in the proposed trial, but also would be happy for either next of kin or an independent consultant neurosurgeon to give surrogate consent if they lacked capacity to consent themselves. The advantages of this type of survey are twofold: they increase patient and public involvement in the research process and allow researchers to design study protocols that are acceptable to the community.

Clinical research, which is essential for improving patient outcomes, is increasingly carried out in the context of networks established between multiple institutions. Research is also considered an important component of training curricula. The recent successful completion of a randomised trial (ROSSINI), which was led by general surgical trainees of the West Midlands Research Collaborative, has established the feasibility of trainee collaborative research networks. A research network for neurosurgical trainees in the UK and Ireland was, therefore, established following the meeting of the British Neurosurgical Trainee Association (BNTA) in Aberdeen on 19 April 2012. This BNTA initiative quickly gained the full support from the Society of British Neurological Surgeons and the UK Neurosurgical Research Network. The inaugural meeting of the British Neurosurgical Trainee Research Collaborative took place at the Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, on 19 October 2012. The purpose of this report is both to record progress to date and to promote this concept.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a major public health problem. This review aims to present the principles upon which modern TBI management should be based. The early management phase aims to achieve haemodynamic stability, limit secondary insults (eg hypotension, hypoxia), obtain accurate neurological assessment and appropriately select patients for further investigation. Since 2003, the mainstay of risk stratification in the UK emergency departments has been a system of triage based on clinical assessment, which then dictates the need for a CT scan of the head. For patients with acute subdural or extradural haematomas, time from clinical deterioration to operation should be kept to a minimum, as it can affect their outcome. In addition, it is increasingly recognised that patients with severe and moderate TBI should be managed in neuroscience centres, regardless of the need for neurosurgical intervention. The monitoring and treatment of raised intracranial pressure is paramount for maintaining cerebral blood supply and oxygen delivery in patients with severe TBI. Decompressive craniectomy and therapeutic hypothermia are the subject of ongoing international multi-centre randomised trials. TBI is associated with a number of complications, some of which require specialist referral. Patients with post-concussion syndrome can be helped by supportive management in the context of a multi-disciplinary neurotrauma clinic and by patient support groups. Specialist neurorehabilitation after TBI is important for improving outcome.

The general consensus to optimize the care for severe TBI patients is management at specialized neurotrauma centers with neurosurgical and neurocritical care support and the use of guidelines-based standardized protocols. Over the last decade, significant efforts have been made to define neurotrauma treatment guidelines. However, it is important to recognize the heterogeneity of TBI and that the "one-size-fits-all approach" may not always be appropriate for these patients. Knowledge synthesis activities in neurotrauma are important to define future research agendas. Clinical and research advances have influenced neurotrauma as it continues to mature into a distinct subspecialty of neurosurgery.

Objective Degenerative cervical myelopathy [DCM] is a disabling and increasingly prevalent group of diseases. Heterogeneous reporting of trial outcomes limits effective inter-study comparison and optimisation of treatment. This is recognised in many fields of healthcare research. The present study aims to assess the heterogeneity of outcome reporting in DCM as the premise for the development of a standardised reporting set. Methods A systematic review of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42015025497) was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Full text articles in English, with >50 patients (prospective) or >200 patients (retrospective), reporting outcomes of DCM were eligible. Results 108 studies, assessing 23,876 patients, conducted world-wide, were identified. Reported outcome themes included function (reported by 97, 90% of studies), complications (reported by 56, 52% of studies), quality of life (reported by 31, 29% of studies), pain (reported by 29, 27% of studies) and imaging (reported by 59, 55% of studies). Only 7 (6%) studies considered all of domains in a single publication. All domains showed variability in reporting. Conclusions Significant heterogeneity exists in the reporting of outcomes in DCM. The development of a consensus minimum dataset will facilitate future research synthesis.

Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.Objective: We sought to determine 30-day survival trends and prognostic factors following surgery for acute subdural hematomas (ASDHs) in England and Wales over a 20-year period. Summary of Background Data: ASDHs are still considered the most lethal type of traumatic brain injury. It remains unclear whether the adjusted odds of survival have improved significantly over time. Methods: Using the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database, we analyzed ASDH cases in the adult population (>16 yrs) treated surgically between 1994 and 2013. Two thousand four hundred ninety-eight eligible cases were identified. Univariable and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed, using multiple imputation for missing data. Results: The cohort was 74% male with a median age of 48.9 years. Over half of patients were comatose at presentation (53%). Mechanism of injury was due to a fall ( 2 m 24%), road traffic collision (25%), and other (17%). Thirty-six per cent of patients presented with polytrauma. Gross survival increased from 59% in 1994 to 1998 to 73% in 2009 to 2013. Under multivariable analysis, variables independently associated with survival were year of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, age, and pupil reactivity. The time interval from injury to craniotomy and direct admission to a neurosurgical unit were not found to be significant prognostic factors. Conclusions: A significant improvement in survival over the last 20 years was observed after controlling for multiple prognostic factors. Prospective trials and cohort studies are expected to elucidate the distribution of functional outcome in survivors.

Traumatic brain injuries result in significant morbidity and mortality. Accurate prediction of prognosis is desirable to inform treatment decisions and counsel family members. Objective To review the currently available prognostic tools for use in traumatic brain injury (TBI), to analyse their value in individual patient management and to appraise ongoing research on prognostic modelling.We present two patients who sustained a TBI in 2011-2012 and evaluate whether prognostic models could accurately predict their outcome. The methodology and validity of current prognostic models are analysed and current research that might contribute to improved individual patient prognostication is evaluated.Predicting prognosis in the acute phase after TBI is complex and existing prognostic models are not suitable for use at the individual patient level. Data derived from these models should only be used as an adjunct to clinical judgement and should not be used to set limits for acute care interventions. Information from neuroimaging, physiological monitoring and analysis of biomarkers or genetic polymorphisms may be used in the future to improve accuracy of individual patient prognostication. Clinicians should consider offering full supportive treatment to patients in the early phase after injury whilst the outcome is unclear.

To analyse the research activity and publication output of surgical trainee research collaboratives in the UK.Surgical trainee research collaboratives in the UK.A total of 24 collaboratives were included in this study from 33 identified organisations. We excluded one group that focused purely on systematic review of the literature and eight groups for which we could not identify suitable data sources (website or trainee committee contact).Primary data-points were identified for each collaborative including surgical subspeciality, numbers and types of projects. For published articles, secondary outcomes including study population size, journal impact factor, number of citations and evidence level were collected.A total of 24 collaboratives met our inclusion criteria with a portfolio of 80 projects. The project types included audit (46%), randomised clinical trial (16%), surveys (16%), cohort studies (10%), systematic reviews (2.5%) and other or unidentifiable (9.5%). A total of 35 publications were identified of which just over half (54%) were original research articles. The median size of studied population was 540 patients with a range from 108 to 3138. The published works provided a varied compilation of evidence levels ranging from 1b (individual RCT) to 5 (expert opinion) with a median level of 2b (individual cohort study). The West Midlands Research Collaborative had the highest number of publications (13), citations (130) and h-index (5).The experience of UK-based trainee research collaboratives provides useful insights for trainees and policymakers in global healthcare systems on the value and feasibility of trainee-driven high quality surgical research.

BACKGROUND\ud The effect of decompressive craniectomy on clinical outcomes in patients with refractory traumatic intracranial hypertension remains unclear.\ud \ud METHODS\ud From 2004 through 2014, we randomly assigned 408 patients, 10 to 65 years of age, with traumatic brain injury and refractory elevated intracranial pressure (>25 mm Hg) to undergo decompressive craniectomy or receive ongoing medical care. The primary outcome was the rating on the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) (an 8-point scale, ranging from death to “upper good recovery” [no injury-related problems]) at 6 months. The primary-outcome measure was analyzed with an ordinal method based on the proportional-odds model. If the model was rejected, that would indicate a significant difference in the GOS-E distribution, and results would be reported descriptively.\ud \ud RESULTS\ud The GOS-E distribution differed between the two groups (P

Background Acute subdural haematomas (ASDH) occur commonly following traumatic brain injury and may be evacuated by either craniotomy (CR) or decompressive craniectomy (DC). We reviewed a series of consecutive patients undergoing evacuation of a traumatic ASDH at a regional centre, comparing observed clinical outcomes (assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale at six months) with those predicted by the CRASH-CT prognostic model.

It was an ordinary day on 30 January 2011; I got with my ordinary family into my ordinary car and went for an ordinary drive along an ordinary road. At around midday, things became anything but ordinary. A burst tyre threw the car off the road into a tree and my world changed. My wife was killed and I suffered, what I later learned was called, a traumatic brain injury (TBI). With the next 3 weeks lost in post-traumatic amnesia, it has taken helpful staff and close reading of the many pages of notes to try to make sense of what happened to me. My good luck began very soon after. A police officer was, by chance, very close to the scene and able to keep my airway open. Within 30 min I was attended by a doctor carried by the East Anglian Air Ambulance. I had sustained a severe head injury with my Glasgow Coma Scale score established as 3–5. After removal from the wreck, I was anaesthetised to reduce the risk of secondary injury and flown to Addenbrooke's Hospital approximately 60 miles away. With resuscitation ongoing, I was rushed for a full body CT and found to have a cracked rib, pneumothorax and bruising of my lungs. The CT head showed evidence of diffuse brain damage (figure 1). Figure 1 An emergency CT scan of head showed evidence of multifocal intraparenchymal injuries with small foci of haemorrhage in the right frontal lobe (A), left basal ganglia (B) and left occipital lobe (C). There were also multiple facial and skull base fractures with significant extracranial soft tissue swelling. A MR …

Isolated oculomotor nerve palsy following head injury is uncommon. It can only be diagnosed with confidence if it is known to have developed immediately following trauma and if adequate investigations exclude secondary causes. The recovery is only partial and this has repercussion on patients' quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) is increasingly used for Olfactory Groove Meningiomas (OGMs). The role of EES for large (4cm) or complex OGMs is debated. Specific imaging features have been reported to affect the degree of gross total resection (GTR) and complications following EES for OGMs. The influence of these factors on transcranial resection (TCR) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We examined the impact of specific imaging features on outcome following TCR to provide a standard for large and endoscopically less favorable OGMs against which endoscopic outcomes can be compared. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients undergoing TCR for OGMs 2002–2016. RESULTS: 50 patients (mean age 62.1 years, mean maximum tumor diameter 5.04 cm and average tumor volume of 48.8 cm3) were studied. Simpson grade 1 and 2 resections were achieved in 80% and 12%, respectively. A favorable functional outcome [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–2] was attained in 86%. The degree of resection, mRS, mortality (4%), recurrence (6%), infection (8%) and CSF leak requiring intervention (12%) was not associated with tumor calcification, absence of cortical cuff, T2 hyperintensity, tumor configuration, tumor extension beyond midpoint of superior orbital roof or extension to posterior wall of frontal sinus. There was no difference in resection rates but a trend towards greater complications between three arbitrarily divided groups of large meningiomas of increasing complexity based on extensive extension or vascular adherence. CONCLUSION: Favorable outcomes can be achieved with TCR for large and complex OGMs. Factors which may preclude endoscopic resection do not negatively affect outcome following TCR.

Cavernous malformations are vascular lesions which can occur throughout the entire neuraxis. This term is synonymous to cavernous angioma, cavernous haemangioma, and cavernoma. They comprise of closely packed, capillary-like vascular channels, without intervening neural tissue. MR imaging is currently the study of choice for the diagnosis of cavernous malformations as they are considered angiographically occult lesions. Intramedullary location represents only 3-5% of all central nervous system cavernous malformations, with the majority of them being supratentorial. Only 10% of the intramedullary cavernous malformations present in the paediatric population. As the natural history of these lesions is not well known, the debate on the optimal management of them is still ongoing. Here we describe the case of a 14-year-old male with progression of symptoms over an 18 months period, which necessitated microsurgical removal of a T9 intramedullary cavernous malformation.

Cerebral vasospasm is a potentially incapacitating or lethal complication in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The development of effective preventative and therapeutic interventions has been largely hindered by the fact that the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of cerebral vasospasm remain poorly understood. However, intensive research during the last 3 decades has identified certain mechanisms that possibly play a role in its development. Experimental data suggest that calcium-dependent and -independent vasoconstriction is taking place during vasospasm. It appears that the breakdown products of blood in the subarachnoid space are involved, through direct and/or indirect pathways, in the development of vasospasm after SAH. Free radicals reactions, an imbalance between vasoconstrictor and vasodilator substances (endothelium derived substances, e.g., nitric oxide, endothelin; arachidonic acid metabolites, e.g., prostaglandins, prostacyclin), inflammatory processes, an upheaval of neuronal mechanisms that regulate vascular tone, endothelial proliferation, and apoptosis have all been put forward as causative and/or pathogenic factors. Translational research in the field of vasospasm has traditionally aimed to identify agents/interventions in order to block the cascades initiated after SAH. The combination of novel approaches such as cerebral microdialysis, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, proteomics, and lipidomics could serve a dual purpose: elucidating the complex pathobiochemistry of vasospasm and providing clinicians with tools for early detection of this feared complication. The purpose of this Mini-Review is to provide an overview of the pathogenesis of cerebral vasospasm and of novel approaches used in basic and translational research.

Chronic subdural haematoma is one of the most common conditions in general neurosurgical practice. Its incidence in the general population is about 5 per 100,000 per year, with increasing incidence linked to age. It presents with a wide variety of symptoms and accounts for approximately 1% of all hospital admissions with acute confusion. This chapter explores the management of chronic subdural haematoma through a case study. As more patients survive into their ninth and tenth decades, not only will the incidence of CSDH continue to rise, but surgeons will be faced with increasingly complex patients with multiple medical co-morbidities. In particular, the issue of anticoagulation is likely to become more pertinent. Further research should be directed towards establishing evidence-based guidelines for resuming anticoagulation and antiplatelet medication after CSDH surgery. By identifying risk factors for both recurrence and thromboembolism, the decision can then be taken on a case-by-case basis, tailored to the individual’s risk factors.

As surgical trainees across multiple disciplines, it is our collective aim for all surgical patients to have the opportunity to participate in at least one clinical trial during their hospital episode.1 We recognise that most patients wish to have this option,2 and we want our training to facilitate this. Because patients have the right to be involved in improving surgical …

Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive malignant neoplasm that was thought to be a localised disease with limited metastatic capability. However, recent post-mortem studies have identified metastases to the central nervous system (CNS) in about 3% of cases. Case Description: We present the case of a 65-year-old with a solitary supratentorial metastatic deposit of MPM treated with surgical resection and adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy. Despite a good surgical outcome with symptomatic recovery, the patient died of cardiopulmonary compromise five months postoperatively. Conclusions: Although rare, CNS metastasis of MPM is a condition that neurosurgeons should be aware of. CNS metastases may occur via three distinct mechanisms, namely perineural spread, leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and, most commonly, haematogenous spread leading to parenchymal deposits. Surgical resection of these deposits can lead to symptomatic improvement, and together with radiotherapy, to local disease control. However, the overall survival remains poor.

OBJECT Cerebral blood flow is associated with cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), which is clinically monitored through arterial blood pressure (ABP) and invasive measurements of intracranial pressure (ICP). Based on critical closing pressure (CrCP), the authors introduce a novel method for a noninvasive estimator of CPP (eCPP). METHODS Data from 280 head-injured patients with ABP, ICP, and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography measurements were retrospectively examined. CrCP was calculated with a noninvasive version of the cerebrovascular impedance method. The eCPP was refined with a predictive regression model of CrCP-based estimation of ICP from known ICP using data from 232 patients, and validated with data from the remaining 48 patients. RESULTS Cohort analysis showed eCPP to be correlated with measured CPP (R = 0.851, p < 0.001), with a mean ± SD difference of 4.02 ± 6.01 mm Hg, and 83.3% of the cases with an estimation error below 10 mm Hg. eCPP accurately predicted low CPP (< 70 mm Hg) with an area under the curve of 0.913 (95% CI 0.883–0.944). When each recording session of a patient was assessed individually, eCPP could predict CPP with a 95% CI of the SD for estimating CPP between multiple recording sessions of 1.89–5.01 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS Overall, CrCP-based eCPP was strongly correlated with invasive CPP, with sensitivity and specificity for detection of low CPP that show promise for clinical use.

Epidemiological data on the incidence of Bell’s palsy (BP) are conflicting. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the variation of cases of BP acutely presented in the emergency room of our department over a 15-year period (January 1990 to December 2004). We examined the monthly and seasonal distribution of BPs among 36,312 patients who came to our emergency services and compared it with the assumed equal distribution of cases over the year (null hypothesis) using χ2 techniques. During the observation period 1,252 of all patients (3.45%) presented due to BP. A decline during the summer was observed, in contrast to a peak documented during the autumn and winter. January and July were the months with the highest and lowest frequency of BP, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed a significantly different seasonal (χ2 = 10.569; d.f. = 3; p = 0.014) and monthly (χ2 = 25.445; d.f. = 11; p = 0.008) pattern of BP cases. The distribution of cases of BP shows a significant variation with a decline during the summer and an increase during the colder period of the year. A similar pattern has been described for reactivated herpetic ocular infections. Since a similar pathogenetic mechanism is regarded as the main cause of BP, the chronobiological aspects and the influence of meteorological factors on the reactivation of latent infections deserves further prospective evaluation.