Search

Treatment with the antimuscarinic agents tolterodine and oxybutynin is the mainstay of therapy for overactive bladder, a chronic and debilitating condition characterized by urinary urgency with or without urge incontinence, usually in combination with urinary frequency and nocturia. This study consisted of two trials; in one, patients with overactive bladder were randomized to 8 weeks of open-label treatment with either 2 mg or 4 mg of once-daily extended-release tolterodine (TER), and in the other to 5 mg or 10 mg of extended-release oxybutynin (OER). The study protocol and design were identical for the two trials and site selection ensured that there was no bias in either trial for the tendency of investigators to prescribe one drug rather than the other, or for geographical location. A total of 1289 patients were enrolled, 669 in the tolterodine trial (TER 2 mg, n = 333; TER 4 mg, n = 336) and 620 in the oxybutynin trial (OER 5 mg, n = 313; OER 10 mg, n = 307). Fewer patients prematurely withdrew from the trial in the TER 4 mg group (12%) than either the OER 5 mg (19%; p = 0.01) or OER 10 mg groups (21%; p = 0.002). More patients in the OER 10 mg group than the TER 4 mg group withdrew because of poor tolerability (13% vs 6%; p = 0.001). After 8 weeks, 70% of patients in the TER 4 mg group perceived an improved bladder condition, compared with 60% in the TER 2 mg group, 59% in the OER 5 mg group and 60% in the OER 10 mg group (all p < 0.01 vs TER 4 mg). Response to therapy was greater in a subgroup of patients whose perception of bladder condition was moderate to severe at baseline (TER 4 mg 77% vs OER 10 mg 65%; p < 0.01). Dry mouth was dose-dependent with both agents, although differences between doses only reached statistical significance in the oxybutynin trial (OER 5 mg vs OER 10 mg; p = 0.05). Patients treated with TER 4 mg reported a significantly lower severity of dry mouth compared with OER 10 mg. In conclusion, the greater efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine ER 4 mg suggests improved clinical effectiveness compared with oxybutynin ER 10 mg.

This randomized, double-blind, crossover study investigated the potential effects of tolterodine ((R)-N,N-diisopropyl-3-(2-hydroxy-5-methyl-phenyl)-3-phenylpropanamine, CAS 124937-51-5), an antimuscarinic agent for the treatment of the overactive bladder, on the anticoagulant actions and pharmacokinetics of single-dose warfarin (CAS 81-81-2) in 20 healthy male volunteers. In terms of study design, volunteers randomly received oral tolterodine L-tartrate (2 mg twice daily) or matching placebo for 7 days, with a single oral dose of warfarin (25 mg) administered on day 4 of each treatment period. R-(+)- and S-(-)-warfarin pharmacokinetics were estimated from plasma levels measured up to 96 h post-dose, in conjunction with assessment of prothrombin time and factor VII activity. Pharmacokinetics of tolterodine and its active 5-hydroxymethyl metabolite ((R)-N,N-diisopropyl-3-(2-hydroxy-5-hydroxymethyl-phenyl)-3-phenylpropanamine; 5-HM), in the presence and absence of warfarin, were also determined. Relative to placebo, tolterodine had no discernible effect on the anticoagulant actions of warfarin. Point estimates of the tolterodine: placebo ratios for prothrombin time and factor VII activity were 1.00 (90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-1.10) and 0.91 (90% CI: 0.83-0.99), respectively, consistent with equivalence. No clinically significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of R-(+)- and S-(-)-warfarin were noted. Serum concentration-time profiles and the pharmacokinetics of tolterodine and 5-HM were similar in the presence and absence of warfarin. There were no safety concerns. These findings indicate that co-administration of tolterodine and warfarin is safe and well tolerated, with no clinically significant pharmacodynamic or kinetic interaction in healthy volunteers.

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a chronic condition that often requires long-term treatment to maintain control of symptoms. A range of therapeutic options are available; however, antimuscarinic agents form the mainstay of treatment. Of these agents, tolterodine and oxybutynin are the most widely used. It is well documented that the immediate-release (IR) formulations of these agents have equivalent efficacy in relieving OAB symptoms. However, tolterodine demonstrates a more favorable tolerability profile, particularly in terms of the frequency and severity of dry mouth. Due to the development of novel drug delivery systems, extended-release (ER) formulations of both oxybutynin and tolterodine are now available, permitting once-daily dosing. The convenience of once-daily dosing of antimuscarinic agents would be expected to improve patient compliance and further relieve the symptoms of OAB. Clinical studies with the ER formulations of tolterodine and oxybutynin demonstrate potential clinical advantages over their respective IR forms in terms of either efficacy or tolerability or both, although the therapeutic index of tolterodine ER appears to show a greater advantage over its IR counterpart compared with oxybutynin ER and its IR form. Importantly, the two ER agents have not been compared directly in a head-to-head clinical study. Overall, available clinical data suggest that the newly developed ER formulation of tolterodine represents a significant therapeutic advancement in the treatment of OAB.

Background: Tolterodine is an antimuscarinic agent for the treatment of overactive bladder, a chronic condition that is particularly common in women. Given the prevalence pattern of overactive bladder and the widespread use of oral contraception, circumstances are likely to arise in which physicians may wish to prescribe tolterodine for patients already taking oral contraceptives. Based on a search of MEDLINE from 1990 to 2001, there have been no studies of whether concomitant use of these agents entails a risk of drug-drug interaction or conception., Objective: This study investigated the effects of tolterodine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a low-dose combination oral contraceptive (ethinyl estradiol 30 microg/levonorgestrel 150 microg)., Methods: This was an open-label, randomized, 2-period crossover study in healthy women. Oral contraception was given for 21 days either alone or in combination with oral tolterodine 2 mg BID (on days 1-14) over two 28-day contraceptive cycles. Pharmacokinetic assessments were performed on day 14 based on plasma levels of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel up to 24 hours after dosing and serum tolterodine levels at 1 to 3 hours after dosing. The potential for pharmacodynamic interaction was assessed in terms of the risk of failure of suppression of ovulation based on serum levels of estradiol and progesterone measured throughout each cycle., Results: Twenty-four healthy women (age, 23-41 years [mean, 30 years]; height, 155-178 cm [mean, 167 cm]; body weight, 51-75 kg [mean, 64 kg]) participated in the study. There was no evidence of a pharmacokinetic interaction between tolterodine and the steroid hormones in the oral contraceptive used, nor did the oral contraceptive show any relevant pharmacokinetic interaction with tolterodine. Serum levels of estradiol and progesterone indicated suppression of ovulation in both treatment periods., Conclusion: In this selected population. coadministration of tolterodine did not affect the contraceptive efficacy of a low-dose combination oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel.

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a chronic and prevalent condition, the symptoms of which (urinary frequency and urgency, with or without urge incontinence) can exert a profound negative effect on a person's daily life activities. Tolterodine (Detrol in North America and Detrusitol in the rest of the world, Pharmacia), a competitive muscarinic antagonist, is the first agent of this class to be specifically developed for the treatment of OAB. This agent displays in vivo functional selectivity for the bladder over other tissues that contain muscarinic receptors (e.g., salivary glands, eye), which translates into good efficacy and tolerability in patients with OAB (including the elderly). Comparative, randomised, double-blind studies show that tolterodine (administered as immediate-release [IR] tablets 2 mg b.i.d.) is as effective as oxybutynin (5 mg t.i.d.) in improving all of the troublesome symptoms of OAB but with a significantly lower incidence and severity of dry mouth. The advent of a new extended-release (ER) capsule formulation of tolterodine (4 mg) for convenient once-daily treatment builds upon these findings, with significantly improved efficacy for reducing urge incontinence episodes and a lower frequency of dry mouth relative to the existing IR tablet (2 mg b.i.d.). Tolterodine can therefore be considered a valuable, well-tolerated treatment option for patients with OAB, providing improvements in symptoms that are both clinically meaningful to patients and sustained during long-term treatment.

This analysis reviews clinical trials of the efficacy and safety of tolterodine for use in overactive bladder. It also compares the safety and efficacy of tolterodine and previously available pharmacotherapy. The MEDLINE database (1966 to present) was searched for all English language randomized controlled trials with keyword tolterodine. The search retrieved 10 randomized controlled trials involving tolterodine. Studies ranged from 2 to 12 weeks in duration. Nine trials studied tolterodine vs. placebo, 6 compared tolterodine vs. oxybutynin, 6 compared different doses of tolterodine, and 1 compared immediate-release and extended-release tolterodine. Doses of tolterodine were 0.5-4 mg bid or 4 mg extended-release daily, and doses of oxybutynin were 5 mg bid or tid. All studies found a benefit of tolterodine over placebo in decreasing symptoms of overactive bladder. Parameters significantly improved by tolterodine include number of voids per day, urine volume per void, number of incontinent episodes per day, pad use, maximal cystometric capacity, residual volume, volume at first detrusor contraction, and volume at normal desire to void. Tolterodine 2 mg bid was consistently of equal efficacy as oxybutynin 5 mg tid. Adverse events with both medications were mostly dose-related autonomic nervous system events. The most common adverse event was dry mouth, which was both more frequent and more severe with oxybutynin 5 mg tid than with tolterodine 2 mg bid. Dry mouth did not generally result in discontinuation of medication with either drug. Most drug withdrawal was because of blurred vision or headache. Tolterodine 2 mg bid caused less dose reduction, patient withdrawal, and adverse events, especially dry mouth, compared with oxybutynin 5 mg tid. A single trial found tolterodine extended-release 4 mg/day to have improved efficacy for decreasing urge incontinence episodes along with lower frequency of dry mouth vs. immediate-release tolterodine 2 mg bid. At 4 mg bid, tolterodine caused urinary retention. Neither drug significantly altered any laboratory tests, nor was there clear evidence of electrocardiographic abnormalities induced by either drug. In all randomized controlled trials to date, tolterodine 2 mg bid is an equally effective alternative to oxybutynin 5 mg tid, while causing less intense and less frequent dry mouth or need for treatment withdrawal.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of tolterodine compared to placebo in patients with an overactive bladder., Study Design: A double-blind, multi-centre phase III study in France and Belgium 251 patients with overactive bladder symptoms, and urodynamically verified detrusor overactivity, were randomised to receive 4-week treatment with either placebo or tolterodine 1 or 2mg twice daily (bd). Efficacy was evaluated from patient micturition diaries. Safety and tolerability endpoints were also evaluated., Results: After 4-week treatment, the number of incontinence episodes/24h decreased significantly relative to placebo in the tolterodine 1 and 2 mgbd groups (P=0.045 and P=0.0089, respectively). Both dosages of tolterodine increased volume voided per micturition compared with placebo (P=0.055 and P=0.056, respectively), although significant decreases in micturition frequency were not apparent. Tolterodine was safe and well tolerated, few patients were withdrawn due to adverse events. Dry mouth, mainly of mild-to-moderate intensity, was the most common adverse event. No clinically relevant changes in blood pressure or laboratory safety variables were reported., Conclusion: Tolterodine is effective, safe and well tolerated for the treatment of symptoms of an overactive bladder, particularly urge incontinence.

Objective: To compare tolterodine with oxybutynin in treatment of urge incontinence., Study Design: A systematic review, following Cochrane methods, was performed to retrieve results of randomized trials that compared tolterodine with oxybutynin in adults with urge incontinence. Composite point estimates of efficacy (episodes of incontinence per 24-hour period, frequency, and voided volume) and safety (dry mouth, withdrawal, and dose modification) were calculated., Results: Four studies were included. Both drugs similarly decreased the number of micturitions in a 24-hour period. Oxybutynin was marginally superior to tolterodine in decreasing the number of incontinent episodes in a 24-hour period (weighted mean difference, 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.77) and increasing the mean voided volume per micturition (8.24 mL; 95% CI, 14.19 to 3.38). Fewer patients had dry mouth (relative risk, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.61) and withdrew from the study because of side effects (relative risk, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.88) with tolterodine., Conclusions: Oxybutynin and tolterodine share a clinically similar efficacy profile (although oxybutynin is statistically superior), but tolterodine is better tolerated and leads to fewer withdrawals as a result of adverse events.

Antimuscarinic compounds are increasingly used to treat the symptoms of overactive bladder; however, their use is often restricted by peripheral adverse effects (AEs). On the other hand, data regarding their influence on the central nervous system (CNS) are limited. This randomized, single-blind, parallel-group quantitative-topographical EEG (qEEG) study of clinical phase I investigates the potential CNS adverse effects of the three antimuscarinic drugs--tolterodine, oxybutynin, and trospium chloride--in comparison to placebo. Overall, 4 x 16 (total 64) young, healthy male volunteers were included in the study. The subjects were given either placebo or the clinically recommended daily doses of the drugs dispensed in three doses on a single day (tolterodine 2 mg bid and once placebo, total 4 mg/d; oxybutynin 5 mg tid, total 15 mg/d; and trospium chloride 15 mg tid, total 45 mg/d). The qEEG was recorded prior to and up to 4 hours after each intake of the trial medication (a total of 10 qEEG sessions) under three different conditions: at rest with eyes open, eyes closed, and under mental demand. The drug tolerability was subjectively evaluated by the volunteer and the investigator. In comparison to placebo (10% confidence interval), tolterodine and trospium chloride did not induce changes of the qEEG power in five of the six frequency bands (i.e., delta, alpha 1, alpha 2, beta 1, and beta 2). Isolated power decreases were only observed in the theta frequency band. In contrast, oxybutynin caused significant power reductions in four frequency bands (theta, alpha 1, alpha 2, and beta 1; p < 0.01). The subjectively evaluated drug tolerability was comparable between all treatment groups, although differences in the AE occurrence existed, with the AE frequency being higher in the oxybutynin group. The results of this study support the findings that oxybutynin as a tertiary amine crosses the blood-brain barrier, causing significant qEEG activity changes and more pronounced central adverse effects. Although tolterodine is also a tertiary amine, it shows limited effects on qEEG activity (i.e., slight theta power reductions), comparable to the effects of trospium chloride, a quarternary amine, which barely crosses the blood-brain barrier. The minimal qEEG changes observed with tolterodine and trospium chloride reflect most probably a rebound message from the peripheral target organs. Prescription of oxybutynin thus implicates a higher risk of CNS side effects.

Background: Oxybutynin chloride and tolterodine tartrate are anticholinergic agents used to suppress involuntary bladder contractions in urinary incontinence. They act by inhibiting binding of acetylcholine to the muscarinic receptors in the detrusor muscle of the bladder. The same types of muscarinic receptors are found in the salivary glands; thus anticholinergic agents may decrease saliva production and cause dry mouth, a commonly cited reason for discontinuation of therapy., Objective: The primary objective of this study was to compare saliva output, which is an objective measure of dry mouth, in subjects taking immediate- or extended-release oxybutynin, tolterodine, or placebo., Methods: This was a single-site, single-dose, randomized, double-blind, 4-treatment, 4-period crossover study. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment sequences that included extended-release oxybutynin 10 mg, tolterodine 2 mg, immediate-release oxybutynin 5 mg, and placebo. Saliva output was measured objectively before dosing with each treatment and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after dosing., Results: Thirty-six healthy adult volunteers (22 women and 14 men) participated in the study. They ranged in age from 19 to 42 years (mean, 27 years). Thirty-one were white, 3 Asian, and 2 black. There were no significant differences in predose saliva output between the 4 study groups. With placebo, saliva output increased throughout the day. Saliva output was maintained at predose levels throughout the day with extended-release oxybutynin. Two hours after dosing with tolterodine and immediate-release oxybutynin, saliva output decreased nearly 0.5 g in specimens collected over 2 minutes. All 3 active treatments were associated with lower saliva output compared with placebo. Extended-release oxybutynin and tolterodine were similar with respect to area under the saliva concentration-time curve but were associated with significantly greater saliva output than was immediate-release oxybutynin (P < 0.01). There were no serious adverse events (AEs) in this study. AEs were similar between treatments, although the incidence of headache was higher in the active-treatment groups than with placebo., Conclusions: Objective assessment of saliva output in healthy adult volunteers indicated that extended-release oxybutynin and tolterodine had less impact on saliva output than did conventional immediate-release oxybutynin, suggesting that they may yield lower levels of dry mouth.

Purpose: We compared the tolerability and clinical efficacy of tolterodine with those of oxybutynin in patients with an overactive bladder using an upward oxybutynin dose titration strategy analogous to that used in routine clinical practice in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland., Materials and Methods: In a randomized double-blind trial 378 male and female patients 50 years old or older with symptoms of overactive bladder (a urinary frequency of 8 or more voids per 24 hours with urgency and/or urge incontinence, that is 1 or more urge incontinence episodes per 24 hours) received 10 weeks of treatment with 2 mg. tolterodine twice daily/or an initial dose of 2.5 mg. oxybutynin twice daily, increasing to 5 mg. twice daily after 2 weeks of treatment. The main outcome measures were changes in voiding diary variables combined with detailed tolerability-safety assessments., Results: Patients treated with tolterodine had significantly fewer adverse events (69% versus 81%, p = 0.01), notably dry mouth (37% versus 61%, p <0.0001), as well as a lower incidence of dose reduction (6% versus 25%, p <0.0001) than those in the oxybutynin group. Each agent had comparable efficacy for improving urinary symptoms. Tolterodine and oxybutynin caused a significant decrease (p = 0.0001) in the mean number of voids per 24 hours (-1.7 or -15% and -1.7 or -15%, respectively), urge incontinence episodes per 24 hours (-1.3 or -54% and -1.8 or -62%, respectively) and mean voided volume per void (33 ml. or 22% and 34 ml. or 23%) after 10 weeks of treatment., Conclusions: Tolterodine is as effective as oxybutynin for improving the symptoms of overactive bladder but it has superior tolerability. The combination of these qualities makes tolterodine the preferred pharmacological therapy for the long-term treatment of this condition.

Tolterodine is the first muscarinic receptor antagonist that has been specifically developed for the treatment of overactive bladder. The objectives in the discovery program were to design a potent muscarinic receptor antagonist that is equipotent to oxybutynin in the bladder, but less potent in salivary glands, with the aim of improving tolerability (less dry mouth) in patients with overactive bladder. Tolterodine is non-selective with respect to the muscarinic M1-M5 receptor subtypes, but has a greater effect on the bladder than on salivary glands in vivo, in both animals and humans. Clinical results show that the efficacy and safety of tolterodine in overactive bladder is equal to that of oxybutynin, but that tolterodine is significantly better tolerated by the patients.

Objective: To determine the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of tolterodine in children with an overactive bladder., Patients and Methods: Thirty-three children (20 boys and 13 girls, aged 5-10 years) with an overactive bladder and symptoms of urgency, frequency and/or urge incontinence were enrolled in an open, dose-escalation study. Patients were treated with oral tolterodine 0.5 mg (n = 11), 1 mg (n = 10) or 2 mg (n = 12) twice daily for 14 days. The primary safety endpoint was the change in residual urinary volume, as determined by ultrasonography. In addition, voiding diary variables (frequency and incontinence episodes) and pharmacokinetics were evaluated. Other safety endpoints included laboratory variables, electrocardiogram recordings and reported adverse events., Results: There were no safety concerns in terms of the change in residual urinary volume for any of the three dosage groups; values were comparable with baseline after 2 weeks of treatment for all three dosages. Adverse events were reported by 20 patients (six on 0.5 mg, five on 1 mg, and nine on 2 mg). Most adverse events were not considered to be drug-related; of the 13 possibly related events, 10 occurred in those taking 2 mg. Headache was the most commonly reported adverse event. No serious adverse events were reported and there were no general safety concerns. There was an improvement in voiding diary variables in all treatment groups after 2 weeks of treatment, although the efficacy was greatest in those taking 1 mg and 2 mg. Pharmacokinetic findings were consistent with dose linearity over the range 0.5-2 mg., Conclusion: The results support the use of 1 mg twice daily as the optimal dose of tolterodine for treating children aged 5-10 years with an overactive bladder.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release oxybutynin chloride and tolterodine tartrate at 12 weeks in participants with overactive bladder., Subjects and Methods: The OBJECT (Overactive Bladder: Judging Effective Control and Treatment) study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study conducted between March and October 2000 at 37 US study sites. Participants who had between 7 and 50 episodes of urge incontinence per week and 10 or more voids in 24 hours received extended-release oxybutynin, 10 mg/d, or tolterodine, 2 mg twice daily. The outcome measures were the number of episodes of urge incontinence, total incontinence, and micturition frequency at 12 weeks adjusted for baseline., Results: A total of 315 women and 63 men were randomized and treated, and 332 participants (276 women, 56 men) completed the study. At the end of the study, extended-release oxybutynin was significantly more effective than tolterodine in each of the main outcome measures: weekly urge incontinence (P=.03), total incontinence (P=.02), and micturition frequency episodes (P=.02) adjusted for baseline. Both drugs improved symptoms of overactive bladder significantly from baseline to the end of the study as assessed by the 3 main outcome measures (P<.001). Dry mouth, the most common adverse event, was reported by 28.1% and 33.2% of participants taking extended-release oxybutynin and tolterodine, respectively (P=.32). Rates of central nervous system and other adverse events were low and similar in both groups., Conclusions: Extended-release oxybutynin was more effective than tolterodine as measured by end-of-study urge incontinence, total incontinence, and micturition frequency episodes. Both groups had similar rates of dry mouth and other adverse events.

Previously available antimuscarinic therapies for overactive bladder are poorly tolerated due to a high incidence of adverse events, notably dry mouth. Tolterodine is a bladder-selective, antimuscarinic agent for the treatment of frequency, urgency, and urge incontinence that characterize overactive bladder. In a 9-month open-label study, the safety, tolerability, and clinical efficacy of tolterodine 2 mg twice daily was evaluated in 854 patients with overactive bladder symptoms who had completed one of four 12 week randomized, controlled trials of tolterodine. Safety and tolerability were assessed in terms of adverse events and clinical/laboratory variables. Efficacy was assessed using micturition diaries and patient perception of their bladder condition. In all, 70% of patients remained on treatment for 9 months. Dry mouth was the most frequently reported adverse event, occurring in 28% of patients (intensity: 19% mild, 7% moderate, 2% severe). A total of 9% of patients withdrew due to adverse events. Dosage reduction occurred in 13% of patients. Significant improvements (P < 0.0001) in micturitions per 24 h (-22%), urge incontinence episodes per 24 h (-76%) and volume voided per micturition (+22%) were observed after 9 months of treatment, with 65% of patients reporting an improvement in perception of their bladder problems. The incidence of adverse events and improvements in micturition diary variables during open-label treatment were comparable with those observed during a 12 week randomized treatment. It was concluded that tolterodine is well tolerated and maintains its clinical efficacy during 9 months of treatment. The high proportion of patients remaining on treatment indicates that tolterodine is an effective long-term treatment for overactive bladder.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new extended-release (ER), once-daily, capsule formulation of tolterodine, relative to placebo and the existing immediate-release (IR), twice-daily, tablet formulation, for treatment of the overactive bladder., Methods: This was a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. One thousand five hundred twenty-nine patients (81% women) with urinary frequency (eight or more micturitions every 24 hours) and urge incontinence (five or more episodes per week) were randomized to oral therapy with tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily (n = 507), tolterodine IR 2 mg twice daily (n = 514), or placebo (n = 508) for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed at the end of the treatment period on the basis of the micturition diary variables. Tolerability and safety were assessed by evaluating the adverse events, electrocardiogram parameters, laboratory values, and treatment withdrawals., Results: Tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily (P = 0.0001) and tolterodine IR 2 mg twice daily (P = 0.0005) both significantly reduced the mean number of urge incontinence episodes per week compared with placebo. The median reduction in these episodes as a percentage of the baseline values was 71% for tolterodine ER, 60% for tolterodine IR, and 33% for placebo. The ER formulation was 18% more effective than the IR formulation (P <0.05). Treatment with both formulations of tolterodine was also associated with statistically significant improvements in all other micturition diary variables compared with placebo. For both formulations, the mean decreases in micturition frequency (P <0.0079) and pad usage (P <0.0145) were significant, and the mean volume voided per micturition increased (P = 0.0001). The rate of dry mouth (of any severity) was 23% for tolterodine ER, 30% for tolterodine IR, and 8% for placebo. The overall dry mouth rate for patients taking tolterodine ER was 23% lower than for tolterodine IR (P <0.02), and the rate of severe dry mouth in the ER group was only 1.8%. The rates of withdrawal were comparable for the two active groups and the placebo group. No safety concerns were noted., Conclusions: Tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of overactive bladder with no safety concerns. Tolterodine ER demonstrated an improved efficacy for reducing urge incontinence episodes and a lower frequency of dry mouth compared with the existing IR twice-daily formulation.

The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of food on the pharmacokinetics of tolterodine, its active 5-hydroxymethyl metabolite (5-HM), and exposure to the active moiety (sum of unbound tolterodine + 5-HM) in healthy volunteers. Serum concentrations of tolterodine and 5-HM were measured for up to 12 hours after a single oral dose (2 mg) of tolterodine L-tartrate, administered either on an empty stomach or with a standardized medium-fat breakfast. All 23 subjects completing the study were classified as extensive metabolizers (phenotyped with debrisoquine). Pharmacokinetic data on tolterodine and the active moiety were evaluable for 22 subjects; all completing subjects were evaluable for 5-HM pharmacokinetics. Based on Cmax and AUC(infinity) ratios, relative bioavailability of tolterodine in the presence of food was 1.49 (90% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.71) and 1.53 (1.35-1.72), respectively. The pharmacokinetics of 5-HM and the active moiety were unaffected by food, as were the rates of drug absorption and terminal half-lives of tolterodine and 5-HM. Given that bioequivalence was observed for the active moiety underfed and fasting conditions, the authors concluded that coadministration of tolterodine with food is not expected to have any clinically relevant effects.

Context: Tolterodine is a bladder-selective antimuscarinic agent designed for the treatment of overactive bladder. Traditional antimuscarinic therapies are poorly tolerated due to a high incidence of anticholinergic adverse events and consequently few patients remain on long term therapy., Objective: To evaluate the long term efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder., Design: Twelve-month open-label extension of 4 randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multinational, multicentre trials of 4 weeks' duration., Patients: 714 patients (aged 18 to 92 years) with symptoms of overactive bladder who completed the double-blind portion of the studies., Intervention: Tolterodine 2 mg twice daily for up to 12 months., Main Outcome Measures: Micturition diary variables: number of micturitions per 24 hours, number of urge incontinence episodes per 24 hours, mean urine volume voided per micturition. Safety variables: adverse events, study discontinuation rate., Results: A total of 441 patients (62%) completed 12 months' open-label treatment with tolterodine, which significantly reduced the number of micturitions per 24 hours [mean change -2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.7 to -2.2, median change -20%, p < 0.0001] and number of urge incontinence episodes per 24 hours (mean change -1.3, 95% CI -1.6 to -1.0, median change -74%, p < 0.0001), while the mean volume voided per micturition was significantly increased (+33 ml, 95% CI +28 to +38, median change +18%; p < 0.0001). 41% of patients reported dry mouth (27% mild, 10% moderate, 3% severe). Dosage reduction to 1 mg twice daily was required in 23% of patients. 15% of patients withdrew from the study due to adverse events, with 5% having associated dry mouth., Conclusions: The high percentage of patients completing 12 months' treatment indicates that tolterodine is an effective and well tolerated agent for long term treatment of overactive bladder.

Objective: To determine the multiple dose pharmacokinetics of a new extended release (ER) capsule formulation of tolterodine, compared with the existing immediate release (IR) tablet, in healthy volunteers., Design: Nonblind, randomised, 2-way crossover trial., Participants: 19 healthy volunteers (7 females, 12 males), mean age 33 years (range 18 to 55 years). Prior to the study, all volunteers were classified as either extensive or poor metabolisers by cytochrome P450 2D6 genotyping., Methods: Volunteers received tolterodine ER 4mg once daily or tolterodine IR 2mg twice daily for 6 days (all doses given as the L-tartrate salt). A washout period of 7 days separated the 2 treatments. Serum concentrations of tolterodine, its active 5-hydroxymethyl metabolite (5-HM) and the active moiety (extensive metabolisers: sum of unbound tolterodine + 5-HM; poor metabolisers: unbound tolterodine) were measured for up to 48 hours post-dose on day 6 (steady state). Tolerability was also determined., Results: 17 volunteers (13 extensive metabolisers, 4 poor metabolisers) completed the study and were evaluable for both treatment periods. The 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean ratio of area under the serum concentration-time curve to 24 hours (AUC24) of the active moiety, for all volunteers combined, indicated equivalence for the 2 formulations. Pooled analysis also demonstrated that the peak serum concentration (Cmax) of the active moiety following administration of tolterodine ER was around 75% of that observed for the IR tablet, whereas the trough concentration was around 1.5-fold higher. Overall, the pharmacokinetics of tolterodine (irrespective of genotype) and 5-HM (extensive metabolisers only) were consistent with sustained drug release over 24 hours. Tolterodine ER was well tolerated., Conclusions: The new once daily ER formulation of tolterodine 4mg shows pharmacokinetic equivalence (AUC24) to the existing IR tablet given at a dose of 2mg twice daily. Findings of lower Cmax for tolterodine ER may explain the significantly lower rate of dry mouth subsequently observed in patients with overactive bladder.

Background: Unstable bladder symptoms are a common problem in general practice. Drug therapy with anticholinergic drugs is frequently used in the management of this condition. However such drugs are associated with a high incidence of anticholinergic adverse effects. Tolterodine is a competitive anticholinergic agent, selective for the bladder as opposed to the salivary glands., Objective: To monitor the safety of tolterodine as used in general practice patients in England for the treatment of urinary frequency, urgency and incontinence., Design: Prospective observational cohort study., Patients and Participants: 14,526 patients [mean age 62.7 (SD 16.4) years; 68.6% female]., Methods: Patients prescribed tolterodine in general practice, soon after the release of the drug in the UK, were followed up for a minimum of 6 months using the technique of prescription-event monitoring (PEM)., Results: The most common adverse events reported were dry mouth, headache, malaise, constipation, dyspepsia, nausea and vomiting and pain in abdomen. We identified some uncommon events as possible adverse drug reactions--notably hallucinations, tachycardia and palpitations. The prevalence of these events was compared with that in patient cohorts for other drugs on the PEM database. The age- and sex-adjusted relative risk of hallucinations on tolterodine compared with 10 drugs of other therapeutic classes, and with terodiline, another drug indicated for bladder instability, was 4.85 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.72 to 8.66] and 1.25 (95% CI 0.62 to 2.53), respectively. There was no significant difference for tachycardia/palpitation in this comparison., Conclusions: Tolterodine is well tolerated in general practice at the recommended daily dose. Hallucinations, tachycardia and palpitations are infrequently associated with the drug.

Objectives: To investigate the urodynamic effects and tolerability of the new antimuscarinic drug tolterodine in children with detrusor hyperreflexia., Methods: Twenty-two children (12 boys and 10 girls; age range 3 months to 15 years, mean age 5.7 years) with detrusor hyperreflexia resulting in maximum detrusor pressures exceeding 40 cm H(2)O during filling cystotonometry were enrolled to receive tolterodine tartrate (a total of 0.1 mg/kg orally daily, divided into two doses) either as a first-line therapy (n = 12, group 1) or replacing oxybutynin chloride therapy (n = 10, group 2). Within 3 months, all patients underwent urodynamic re-evaluation during ongoing tolterodine treatment., Results: In group 1, the mean maximum bladder capacity increased from 120.2 to 173.0 mL (+44%), the mean detrusor compliance increased from 8.7 to 13.5 mL/cm H(2)O (+55%), and the mean maximum detrusor pressures decreased from 70.1 to 37.9 cm H(2)O (-46%); the differences were significant (P < 0.001). In group 2, no differences in the urodynamic effects of oxybutynin versus tolterodine were noted. Only 1 patient experienced a transient and moderately adverse effect with tolterodine., Conclusions: Although based on a limited number of subjects, these data indicate that in pediatric patients with detrusor hyperreflexia, tolterodine may be better tolerated than and equally effective as the standard drug oxybutynin chloride.

Objective: To report two cases of warfarin therapy in which the addition of tolterodine resulted in prolonged international normalized ratios (INRs)., Case Summary: Two patients, each receiving warfarin for stroke prophylaxis in association with chronic atrial fibrillation, developed adverse effects after the initiation of tolterodine for urinary disorders. Other medications for concurrent medical diagnoses had remained unchanged. One patient had an episode of prostatitis, which was treated with levofloxacin immediately prior to tolterodine initiation. The warfarin dosage had remained constant for many weeks in both patients prior to and during the tolterodine trials. In each patient, the initiation of tolterodine was associated with a significant increase in the patient's INR measured 10-14 days later. Thus, tolterodine was ineffective in both patients and was discontinued one to two days before the elevated INRs were determined during routine clinic visits. INRs determined approximately two weeks after tolterodine was discontinued were similar to those obtained during the period before the use of the drug; the warfarin dosage remained unchanged. Rechallenge with tolterodine was not attempted in either patient., Discussion: Several aspects of the reported cases support the validity of a proposed drug interaction when tolterodine is initiated in a patient stabilized on warfarin therapy. The temporal association of the course of tolterodine with an elevated INR, the return to the previous warfarin dose-INR response relationship after tolterodine discontinuation, and the absence of other causes for the elevated INR were factors found in both patients. Possible mechanisms to explain the suggested drug interaction are explored., Conclusions: Until further data are available, clinicians should be vigilant for a possible drug interaction when tolterodine therapy is initiated in a patient maintained on warfarin therapy.

Objective: To describe the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety of tolterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder., Data Sources: Published articles and abstracts were identified from a MEDLINE search (January 1980-October 1998) using the terms tolterodine, PNU-200583E, urge incontinence, overactive bladder, detrusor instability, detrusor overactivity, and antimuscarinic. Pertinent articles written in English were considered for review. Additional articles were identified from the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Data from the Food and Drug Administration-approved product labeling and the manufacturer were also used in the absence of published data., Study Selection and Data Extraction: Clinical studies of tolterodine involving human subjects were evaluated., Data Synthesis: Tolterodine is a competitive muscarinic receptor antagonist with relative functional selectivity for bladder muscarinic receptors. It is metabolized in the liver by CYP2D6 to an active metabolite (DD 01), which is partially responsible for its pharmacologic activity. Those who are genetically devoid of CYP2D6 will have higher concentrations of the parent compound and virtually undetectable concentrations of DD 01; however, the clinical efficacy does not appear to be altered. In dosages of 2 mg twice daily, tolterodine has shown consistent reductions in the number of micturitions per 24 hours and less consistently decreased incontinence episodes in patients with detrusor overactivity. The functional selectivity of tolterodine for bladder muscarinic receptors results in fewer systemic adverse effects, such as dry mouth, than occur with comparable nonselective antimuscarinic agents., Conclusions: Clinical studies have shown that the effectiveness of tolterodine for symptoms of overactive bladder is similar to that of oxybutynin. The adverse effect profiles of tolterodine and oxybutynin are similar; however, comparative clinical trials have shown significantly fewer patients taking tolterodine require dosage reductions or discontinue therapy due to antimuscarinic adverse effects such as dry mouth. Although more costly than oxybutynin, tolterodine represents a modest improvement over oxybutynin with respect to adverse effect profile, which may allow more patients with incontinence to tolerate therapeutic doses. Further research is necessary to determine whether tolterodine has clinical advantages over similar agents in patients with other muscarinic adverse effects, such as constipation or cognitive impairment.

Aims: To investigate the pharmacokinetics and safety of tolterodine and tolterodine metabolites after single-and multiple-dose administration in the absence and presence of ketoconazole, an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, in healthy volunteers with deficient CYP2D6 activity, i.e. poor metabolisers of debrisoquine., Methods: Eight healthy volunteers received single oral doses (2 mg) of tolterodine l-tartrate. Following a wash-out period of about 3 months, six of the subjects participated in a multiple-dose (1 mg twice daily) phase of the study. Ketoconazole 200 mg was given once daily for 4-4.5 days during both the single and multiple dose tolterodine administration phases. Blood samples were drawn and the pharmacokinetics of tolterodine and its metabolites were determined., Results: A decrease (P<0.01) in apparent oral clearance of tolterodine, from 10- 12 l h-1 to 4.3-4.7 l h-1, was obtained during concomitant administration of ketoconazole, yielding at least a two-fold increase in the area under the serum concentration-time curve after single as well as after multiple doses following single dose administration of tolterodine. The mean (+/-s.d.) terminal half-life increased by 50% from 9.7+/-2.7 h to 15+/-5.4 h in the presence of ketoconazole., Conclusions: CYP3A4 is the major enzyme involved in the elimination of tolterodine in individuals with deficient CYP2D6 activity (poor metabolisers), since oral clearance of tolterodine decreased by 60% during ketoconazole coadministration. This inhibition resulted in 2.1-fold increase in AUC.

This study compared the clinical efficacy (determined from micturition diaries) and safety of 12 weeks' treatment with either tolterodine 2 mg twice daily, oxybutynin 5 mg three times daily or placebo in patients with an overactive bladder. A total of 277 patients were randomized and treated at 25 centers. Both tolterodine and oxybutynin significantly increased volume voided/micturition compared to placebo. Both treatment groups evoked greater decreases in micturitions per 24 hours and incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to placebo; however, only tolterodine was significantly better than placebo in reducing micturition frequency. Tolterodine and oxybutynin were equivalent in their effectiveness. Tolterodine was significantly better tolerated than oxybutynin when adverse events (particularly frequency and intensity of dry mouth), dose reduction and patient withdrawals were considered. Oxybutynin is an effective drug whose frequent adverse effects limit its clinical usefulness. Tolterodine has equivalent efficacy to oxybutynin, but with less severe adverse effects. This will allow patients to receive more effective treatment for their condition, with better compliance.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine with that of oxybutynin in patients with an overactive bladder., Patients and Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multinational phase-III study was conducted in urology and gynaecology clinics in the UK, Republic of Ireland and Sweden. The study enrolled 293 patients with urodynamically confirmed bladder overactivity, increased frequency of micturition (> or = micturitions/24 h) and symptoms of urgency and/or urge incontinence (> or = 1 episode/24 h). Patients received either tolterodine (2 mg twice daily) or oxybutynin (5 mg three times daily) or placebo. Doses could be reduced, to prevent withdrawal, to 1 mg or 2.5 mg, respectively. The main outcome measures were the mean change from baseline in frequency of micturition/24 h, the number of incontinent episodes/24 h and volume voided per micturition., Results: After 12 weeks' treatment, the mean frequency of micturition decreased by 21% and 19.5% in those receiving tolterodine (n = 118) and oxybutynin (n = 118), respectively, and by 10.5% in those on placebo (n = 57). Among those with urge incontinence at baseline (75% of patients), the mean number of incontinent episodes decreased by 47%, 71% and 19%, respectively, in those receiving tolterodine, oxybutynin and placebo. The effect of tolterodine and oxybutynin on these two micturition variables was statistically equivalent. There was also a comparable increase in mean volume voided per micturition in the tolterodine (27%) and oxybutynin groups (31%), compared with 7% in the placebo group. Dry mouth was the most common adverse event and was reported with greater frequency and intensity among patients receiving oxybutynin than among those receiving either tolterodine or placebo. In the oxybutynin group, more patients also withdrew because of adverse events and a greater proportion required dose reduction as a result of adverse events. Despite dose reduction, the frequency of adverse events and the intensity of dry mouth remained higher among those receiving oxybutynin (2.5 mg three times daily) than in patients who remained on tolterodine 2 mg twice daily., Conclusion: Tolterodine 2 mg twice daily is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of bladder overactivity. Tolterodine was better tolerated than oxybutynin, particularly with respect to the frequency and intensity of dry mouth, but had comparable clinical efficacy. The superior tolerability of tolterodine therefore allows more patients to remain on effective therapy than the current most commonly prescribed agent for the treatment of the overactive bladder.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of tolterodine, a new antimuscarinic agent, and define the optimum dosage in patients with symptoms of detrusor instability (urgency, increased frequency of micturition and/or urge incontinence)., Patients and Methods: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study was carried out; after a 1-week run-in period to establish baseline values, 81 patients were randomized to receive placebo or tolterodine 0.5, 1, 2 or 4 mg twice daily for 2 weeks. Micturition (diary) variables, urodynamics and subjective urinary symptoms were assessed after 2 weeks' treatment., Results: A per-protocol analysis of efficacy in 64 patients showed dose-related improvements in recorded micturition and urodynamic variables, e.g. at a dosage of 2 mg twice daily, the frequency of micturition, episodes of incontinence and pad use were reduced by 20%, 46% and 29%, respectively, while the volume at first contraction increased by 89 mL. The 4 mg dosage was associated with a large increase in residual urinary volume and an increased incidence of dry mouth. The incidence of adverse events (mainly mild or moderate antimuscarinic effects) was comparable with placebo at tolterodine dosages of < or = 2 mg. No serious adverse events were observed and tolterodine had no clinically significant impact on electrocardiographic or laboratory findings., Conclusion: The results indicate that tolterodine offers an effective treatment for the symptoms of detrusor instability. The optimum dosage appears to be 1-2 mg twice daily.

Tolterodine is a potent antimuscarinic agent specifically developed for the treatment of urinary urge incontinence and other symptoms related to the overactive bladder. In order to assess the optimum dosage for use in future clinical studies, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study was performed in 90 patients with detrusor hyperreflexia and symptoms of urinary urgency, frequency, and/or urge incontinence. Urodynamic variables, micturition diary variables, and subjective urinary symptoms were measured before and after 2 weeks' treatment with either placebo or tolterodine 0.5, 1, 2, or 4 mg twice daily (bd). Serum drug concentrations, electrocardiogram recordings, blood pressure, and incidence of adverse events were also assessed. Linear regression analysis showed a significant dose-response relationship for several clinically relevant urodynamic variables, while there was a trend towards an improvement in micturition diary variables and subjective assessment of symptoms with increasing dosages of tolterodine. There were no safety or tolerability concerns regarding any of the dosages of tolterodine investigated, although 2 patients treated with a dosage of 4 mg bd experienced urinary retention that necessitated dosage reduction. The results of this study suggest that tolterodine is well-tolerated and exerts a dose-dependent effect on bladder function in patients with detrusor hyperreflexia. The optimum dosage of tolterodine for use in future studies is 1-2 mg bd.

Objectives: To examine the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of tolterodine in four randomized, double-blind, parallel, multicenter, 12-week studies of patients with overactive bladder., Methods: Two of the four studies compared tolterodine (2 mg twice daily) to oxybutynin (5 mg three times daily) and placebo, one study compared tolterodine (2 mg twice daily) to oxybutynin (5 mg three times daily), and one study compared two dosages of tolterodine (1 and 2 mg twice daily) to placebo. Efficacy was determined from micturition diaries and patient perception of their bladder condition. Safety and tolerability were assessed from adverse events and laboratory measures., Results: A total of 1,120 patients were randomized and treated at 134 centers. For the primary efficacy variable, the number of micturitions/24 hours, pooled results showed a significant decrease from baseline for the 1 mg tolterodine (P < 0.001), 2 mg tolterodine (P < 0.001), and 5 mg oxybutynin (P < 0.01) groups, compared to placebo. Both tolterodine doses and oxybutynin significantly decreased incontinence episodes/24 hours and significantly increased volume voided/micturition, compared to placebo. Tolterodine at a dose of 2 mg twice daily and 5 mg oxybutynin twice daily were significantly more effective in improving patient perception of bladder condition than placebo. Tolterodine at a dose of 2 mg and 5 mg oxybutynin were equivalent in their effectiveness. Tolterodine at doses of 1 mg and 2 mg were tolerated significantly better than oxybutynin when adverse events, dry mouth (both frequency and intensity), dose reductions, and patient withdrawals were considered., Conclusions: Although oxybutynin is highly effective, its clinical utility is limited by systemic side effects that lead to frequent discontinuation of treatment or dose reductions. Patients receiving tolterodine should not experience these limitations and instead will get safe and long-term effective treatment for their condition.

The aim of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of tolterodine following single oral and intravenous doses in healthy volunteers. A secondary aim was to identify major urinary metabolites and determine mass balance. Single oral doses of 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 6.4, and 12.8 mg of tolterodine (as the tartrate salt) were given to 17 healthy male volunteers. Two intravenous doses (0.64 and 1.28 mg) were administered to 8 of the volunteers and mass balance was studied after a single oral dose of 5 mg (14C)-tolterodine in 6 subjects. Tolterodine was rapidly absorbed following oral administration (time to peak serum concentration 0.9 +/- 0.4 h). The absolute bioavailability was highly variable, ranging from 10 to 70%. The volume of distribution at steady-state ranged from 0.9 to 1.6 l/kg and systemic clearance ranged from 0.23 to 0.52 l/h/kg, which resulted in a terminal half-life of 2-3 h. Tolterodine exhibited high first-pass metabolism and 2 hepatic metabolic pathways were identified: oxidation and dealkylation. Independent of route of administration, < 1% of the parent compound was excreted unchanged in urine. Five metabolites were structurally identified in urine. Following oral administration of (14C)-tolterodine, the excretion of radioactivity into urine and feces was 77 +/- 4.0% and 17 +/- 3.5%, respectively. Tolterodine decreased stimulated salivation after 3.2 mg, increased heart rate after 6.4 mg, and nearpoint of vision after 12.8 mg. Six of 8 subjects reported micturition difficulties after a dose of 12.8 mg. The lack of a direct relationship between tolterodine serum concentrations and effects on stimulated salivation suggested the presence of pharmacologically active metabolite(s).

A 40-year-old male developed a constant hand and foot dermatitis in 1980 while using sorbolene cream as a barrier cream at work. He was forced to leave his trade as a motor mechanic because of his hand dermatitis. It was not until 16 years later that he was diagnosed as having an allergic contact dermatitis to chlorocresol secondary to an endogenous hand and foot dermatitis. Chlorocresol is the preservative used in sorbolene cream as well as many corticosteroid creams. Patch testing carried out in 1983 was negative but had omitted testing with chlorocresol or sorbolene cream.

Tolterodine is a new competitive muscarinic receptor antagonist developed for the treatment of the unstable bladder. A total of 242 patients were enrolled in a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted over a period of 4 weeks in patients with detrusor overactivity and symptoms of frequency, urgency, and urge incontinence. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of tolterodine given at 1 or 2 mg b.i.d. versus placebo. At week 4 a statistically significant increase in the volume at first contraction (p = 0.030) and maximal cystometric capacity (p = 0.034) was only in the tolterodine 2 mg b.i.d. group. Tolterodine was safe and generally well tolerated. The incidence of dry mouth, as the most commonly reported adverse event, was only 9% and of mild to moderate intensity.

Malignant hyperthermia (MH) in humans is usually triggered by volatile anaesthetics and depolarizing muscle relaxants. However, other factors or drugs (e.g. cresol) are thought to induce MH. We report a case of fulminant MH associated with a ketoacidotic diabetic coma. After therapy for diabetic coma with insulin (containing the preservative cresol) and electrolyte solutions was started, the patient complained of increasing myalgia, developed a high fever and respiratory and metabolic acidosis and lost consciousness. MH was treated immediately with dantrolene; the patient recovered within 14 days. Five months later the patient was diagnosed as MH-susceptible by the in vitro caffeine and halothane contracture test. This case supports the assessment that MH and diabetes are associated diseases and that cresol could possibly trigger MH. Furthermore, therapy with dantrolene has been demonstrated to be beneficial in the treatment of MH associated with diabetic coma.

Tolterodine, a novel compound intended for treatment of urgency and urge incontinence, has been characterized as a potent muscarinic receptor antagonist in pharmacological in vitro and in vivo studies. In cats, tolerodine was shown to reduce bladder pressure at doses significantly lower than those affecting salivation. To predict clinical effectiveness, an open pilot study was performed in healthy male volunteers. Efficacy was measured by cystometry and by spontaneously reported effects after administration of a single oral dose of tolterodine, 6.4 mg, given as a water solution. Tolterodine had distinct inhibitory effects on urinary bladder function, both at 1 and 5 hours post-dose. At 1 hour, but not at 5 hours post-dose tolterodine also significantly reduced stimulated salvation. In addition to the objectively demonstrated changes in urodynamic parameters, most volunteers experienced voiding difficulties. No significant changes in blood pressure, heart rate, or near point of accommodation were registered. Tolterodine, in the dosage used, was both objectively and subjectively shown to exert a marked inhibitory effect on micturition in healthy subjects, and the data suggest a more pronounced effect on bladder function than on salivation.

Examination of 953 workers exposed to low concentrations of chlorbenzene, tricresol and dimethylfonnamid revealed such functional neural disorders as cardiovascular neurosis. Chlorbenzene and tricresol resulted in hypertonic cardiovascular neurosis, dimethylformamid--in hypotonic one. Occurrence of cardiovascular neurosis grew with the longer length of service.

A 16-year-old boy with short stature and mild primary hypothyroidism received subcutaneous injections of either recombinant human growth hormone or placebo in diluent that contained glycerol and m-cresol as a preservative. While he was receiving the study drug, myalgia developed and serum creatine kinase values were elevated. Both resolved when injections were stopped and recurred when injections of diluent alone were given. The myalgia and elevated creatine kinase activity were apparently caused by a component of the diluent.

In general, immediate water irrigation is recommended for all chemical burns. Very few chemicals cannot be safely washed off the skin with water, however cresol is one of the exceptions. A 40 per cent TBSA cresol chemical burn that subsequently developed systemic intoxication and multiple organ failure is reported. The patient survived after intensive general supportive treatment, repeated haemodialysis and wound care.

We have studied the bacteriostatic and airways effects of the preservatives chlorocresol and chlorbutol, to assess if they may be safely used in nebuliser solutions. The bacteriostatic study was carried out according to standard techniques, and the preservatives were able to inhibit the growth of a range of bacteria and yeasts for a period of 28 days. The airways effects were studied in eight asthmatic subjects, who were challenged with either the preservatives or saline (as placebo). Pulmonary function was followed as FEV1 for 60 min after inhalation, and there was no change in FEV1 following inhalation. We conclude that these preservatives may be used safely in nebuliser solutions.

Allergic contact dermatitis developed on the hands and/or face of two patients after exposure to latex examination gloves. Both patients were patch test negative to the usual rubber allergens, but both had a positive patch test reaction to 4,4'-thiobis(6-tert-butyl-m-cresol) (Lowinox 44S36). Patient 2 was also patch test positive to butylhydroxyanisole. The patients were tested with other gloves, to find gloves that they could safely use. Glove manufacturers were queried to ascertain the occurrence of Lowinox 44S36 and butylhydroxyanisole in different brands of latex and vinyl examination gloves. A list of gloves and their associated allergens was generated and is provided to assist dermatologists in helping patients choose gloves free of specific allergens.

Ortho-cresol (o-cresol) produces a modifying influence on the effect produced by benz/a/pyrene (BP) under mice CC57B exposure to the combined peroral administration of the two chemicals. A low-toxic dose of o-cresol (Img) abruptly activates the effect of the same dose of BP (1 mg) according to all parameters (increase of the frequency, coefficient of multiplicity and degree of malignancy of tumours, shortening of the latency period) and somewhat inhibits its activity when administered before or after BP. Simultaneous administration of o-cresol in a ++super-toxic dose (10 mg) and BP in an optimal dose (5 mg) does not change the frequency of tumours, as compared to the control, however, inhibits the progression of induces neoplasms, which is manifest in the decrease of the frequency of malignancy, multiplicity of appearance and lengthening of the time of the onset of their malignization. Simultaneous administration of o-cresol in the dose relevant to the MAC for water does not change the carcinogenic activity of BP, which testifies to the necessity of sanitary control of observing hygienic regulations for both chemicals, as the most effective measure of prophylaxis of the malignant tumours morbidity of the population.