Search

Summary: The immunosuppressive treatment of immune‐mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) in patients with intolerance or refractoriness to the B‐cell depleting monoclonal antibody rituximab remains debated. Daratumumab, a plasma cell‐directed monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, represents a therapeutic option, but data are scarce. The French Thrombotic Microangiopathies Reference Center conducted a nationwide survey on iTTP patients treated with daratumumab. Nine episodes from seven patients were identified. Treatment was administered for A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase with ThromboSpondin‐1 motifs, 13th member (ADAMTS13) relapses while patients were otherwise in clinical response (N = 8), or during the acute phase of the disease following rituximab intolerance (N = 1). Patients have received a median of three previous therapeutic lines. ADAMTS13 activity improved in eight cases following daratumumab administration, including three cases where ADAMTS13 normalized. ADAMTS13 relapses occurred in three patients; in two cases, retreatment with daratumumab was successful. Median ADAMTS13 relapse‐free survival was not reached; 12‐month ADAMTS13 relapse‐free survival was 56%. Daratumumab‐related adverse events occurred in five cases and were non‐severe infusion‐related reactions in all cases. These results suggest that daratumumab may be an effective treatment option for iTTP patients with intolerance or refractoriness to rituximab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (DRd) and bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) are the only preferred treatment regimens for patients with transplant‐ineligible (TIE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). As there are no randomized head‐to‐head studies of DRd versus VRd, this analysis aimed to compare real‐world time‐to‐next‐treatment (TTNT) or death in this population. Methods: Patients with NDMM who received front‐line (FL) DRd or VRd were identified from the Acentrus database (January 1, 2018 to May 31, 2023). Those with a record of a stem cell transplant or aged < 65 years were excluded to limit analysis to the TIE population. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline patient characteristics. A doubly robust Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare TTNT or death between cohorts. Results: A total of 149 and 494 patients who initiated DRd and VRd, respectively, were identified. After weighting (weighted NDRd = 302, weighted NVRd = 341), cohorts had similar baseline characteristics. Of these, 98 (32.4%) DRd and 175 (51.2%) VRd patients either received a subsequent line of therapy or died, with a median TTNT or death of 37.8 months in the DRd cohort and 18.7 months in the VRd cohort (hazard ratio: 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.35, 0.81; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Treatment of TIE NDMM patients with DRd led to a significantly longer TTNT or death compared to VRd, evidenced by a 42% risk reduction, supporting the effectiveness of DRd over VRd as FL treatment in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Our research explores the profile and risk factors for infections in multiple myeloma patients undergoing treatment with daratumumab, a key drug in chemotherapy regimens for this disease. The study seeks to identify which patients are at the highest risk of developing severe infections and the factors contributing to this risk, as infections are a major concern for these patients. Analysis of patient data from our facility showed that lower hemoglobin levels and poorer performance status significantly increase the risk of serious infections. Additionally, we developed predictive algorithms to identify individuals at elevated risk of developing pneumonia during treatment. The findings from our study may help healthcare providers identify high-risk patients and implement targeted strategies to prevent infections, ultimately improving patient care. Background: Daratumumab (Dara) is the first monoclonal antibody introduced into clinical practice to treat multiple myeloma (MM). It currently forms the backbone of therapy regimens in both newly diagnosed (ND) and relapsed/refractory (RR) patients. However, previous reports indicated an increased risk of infectious complications (ICs) during Dara-based treatment. In this study, we aimed to determine the profile of ICs in MM patients treated with Dara-based regimens and establish predictors of their occurrence. Methods: This retrospective, real-life study included MM patients treated with Dara-based regimens between July 2019 and March 2024 at our institution. Infectious events were evaluated using the Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Results: The study group consisted of a total of 139 patients, including 49 NDMM and 90 RRMM. In the RR setting, the majority (60.0%) of patients received the Dara, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) regimen, whereas ND patients were predominantly (98%) treated with the Dara, bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (DVTd) regimen. Overall, 55 patients (39.6%) experienced ICs. The most common IC was pneumonia (37.5%), followed by upper respiratory tract infections (26.8%). Finally, twenty-five patients had severe ICs (grade ≥ 3) and required hospitalization, and eight patients died due to ICs. In the final multivariable model adjusted for setting (ND/RR) and age, hemoglobin level (OR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.96, p = 0.0037), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) >1 (OR 4.46, 95% CI: 1.63–12.26, p = 0.0037) were significant factors influencing severe IC occurrence. Additionally, we developed predictive models using the J48 decision tree, gradient boosting, and random forest algorithms. After conducting 10-fold cross-validation, these models demonstrated strong performance in predicting the occurrence of pneumonia during treatment with daratumumab-based regimens. Conclusions: Simple clinical and laboratory assessments, including hemoglobin level and ECOG scale, can be valuable in identifying patients vulnerable to infections during Dara-based regimens, facilitating personalized prophylactic strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Patients with triple-class refractory (TCR) multiple myeloma (MM) often need cytoreductive chemotherapy for rapid disease control. Bendamustine is an outpatient-administered, bifunctional alkylator and isatuximab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody with unique cytotoxicity characteristics. We hypothesized that isatuximab-bendamustine-prednisone would be well-tolerated regimen in TCR MM, and conducted single-center, phase Ib, investigator-initiated study. Patients/Methods: Patients had TCR MM and last daratumumab exposure ≥ 6 weeks. This study was conducted as a 3 + 3 design to establish the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Isatuximab 10 mg/kg IV was administered weekly (cycle 1), and every 2 weeks thereafter. Bendamustine was administered on days 1 and 2 at 3 dose levels (DL): 50, 75, and 100 mg/m2. Methylprednisolone was administered as 125 mg on day 1 and prednisone 60 mg days 2–4. Common definitions were used for DLTs, adverse events (CTCAE v 5.0), and disease response. Results: Fifteen patients were treated (3 DL1, 6 DL2, 6 DL3). Median age was 71, 53% had high-risk cytogenetics, and 34% had prior BCMA-targeting therapy. One DLT was observed at DL2 (Grade 3 thrombocytopenia plus bleeding). There were no Grade 5 treatment-related AEs. The MTD was not reached. The overall response rate was 20% (3/15) including one stringent complete response. The median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI 0.9–4.1 months). Conclusion: We demonstrated the safety and tolerability of isatuximab-bendamustine-prednisone. Toxicities were mild and manageable with limited intervention. The study was discontinued due to slow accrual. However, we observed responses even among highly refractory patients. Clinical trial registration: This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04083898 on 9/6/2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Cluster of differentiation 38 (CD38) is a key target on multiple myeloma (MM) cells. This multi‐centre, Phase 1, single‐agent study (NCT04000282) investigated SAR442085, a novel fragment crystallisable (Fc)‐modified anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb), with enhanced affinity towards Fc‐gamma receptor on effector cells in patients with relapsed and/or refractory (RR) MM. Methods: This study comprised two parts: Part‐A (dose‐escalation involving anti‐CD38 mAb pre‐treated and naïve patients) and Part‐B (dose expansion). Primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Results: Thirty‐seven heavily pre‐treated patients were treated in Part A. Part‐B (dose‐expansion) was not studied. Seven dose‐limiting toxicities were reported at DL3, DL5, DL6, and DL7. RP2D was determined to be 5–7·5 mg/kg. Most common treatment‐emergent adverse events were infusion‐related reactions in 70·3% (26/37) patients. Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia was reported in 48·6% (18/37). Overall response rate was 70% in anti‐CD38 mAb naïve and 4% in anti‐CD38 pre‐treated patients, with a median progression‐free survival of 7·62 (95%CI: 2·858; not calculable) months and 2·79 (95%CI: 1·150; 4·172) months and, respectively. Conclusions: The efficacy of SAR442085 was promising in anti‐CD38 mAb naïve patients but did not extend to the larger cohort of anti‐CD38 mAb pre‐treated patients. This observation, along with transient high‐grade thrombocytopenia, could potentially limit its clinical use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody against CD38, is increasingly used in the treatment of multiple myeloma, other hematological malignancies and autoimmune diseases. Little is known about its CNS toxicity. We present a case of a patient with POEMS syndrome (syndrome of polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy and skin changes) who developed an acute leukoencephalopathy shortly after initiation of therapy with daratumumab. Methods: Case report following the CARE case report guidelines. Results: The patient presented with symptoms of headache and diffuse worsening of a pre-existing tetraparesis. MRI showed a rapidly progressive leukoencephalopathy. Extensive diagnostic evaluation revealed no specific cause, suggesting the leukoencephalopathy to be caused by daratumumab. Discussion: Our report highlights a probably rare, but clinically significant adverse effect of daratumumab and underlines the necessity of raised vigilance for neurological side effects in patients treated with daratumumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a leading cause of hematopoietic cancer-related mortality, accounting for 20% of deaths. MM-targeted therapies have demonstrated efficacy, and since 2015, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved five targeted drugs. However, their cardiovascular safety has not been comprehensively evaluated. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association between MM-targeted therapy and cardiovascular adverse events (AEs). Methods: Disproportionality analysis was conducted on reports from the FDA AE Reporting System database from 2014 to the second quarter of 2023. Cardiovascular AEs were grouped into nine narrow categories using the Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Queries (SMQs). Results: A total of 3,228 cardiovascular AE cases involving MM-targeted therapy were extracted and analyzed. Significant disproportionality was identified for daratumumab, elotuzumab, and isatuximab. Among the nine narrow SMQ categories, the three most reported cardiovascular AEs were cardiomyopathy, cardiac arrhythmias, and embolic and thrombotic events. Noninfectious myocarditis/pericarditis, cardiac arrhythmias, and embolic and thrombotic events exhibited the strongest signal strengths. The cardiovascular AE risk was higher within the first month and gradually decreased thereafter; however, it increased rapidly again after 1 year. This trend was observed for all cardiovascular AEs. The Kaplan-Meier curve and the log-rank test revealed that isatuximab and elotuzumab exhibited a significantly lower probability of cardiovascular AEs than daratumumab (p < 0.001). Conclusions: MM-targeted therapy is significantly associated with an increased risk of previously unknown cardiovascular AE profiles, with the range and onset differing among various drugs, thereby warranting specific monitoring and appropriate management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Paediatric Burkitt's lymphoma (pBL) is the most common childhood non‐Hodgkin B‐cell lymphoma. Despite the encouraging survival rates for most children, treating cases with relapse/resistance to current therapies remains challenging. CD38 is a transmembrane protein highly expressed in pBL. This study investigates the effectiveness of CD38‐targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), daratumumab and isatuximab, in impairing crucial cellular processes and survival pathways in pBL malignant cells. Methods: In silico analyses of patient samples, combined with in vitro experiments using the Ramos cell line, were conducted to assess the impact of daratumumab and isatuximab on cellular proliferation, apoptosis and the phosphoinositide 3‐kinase (PI3K) pathway. Results: Isatuximab was found to be more effective than daratumumab in disrupting B‐cell receptor signalling, reducing cellular proliferation and inducing apoptosis. Additionally, isatuximab caused a significant impairment of the PI3K pathway and induced metabolic reprogramming in pBL cells. The study also revealed a correlation between CD38 and MYC expression levels in pBL patient samples, suggesting CD38 involvement in key oncogenic processes. Conclusion: The study emphasises the therapeutic potential of CD38‐targeting mAbs, particularly isatuximab, in pBL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Real-world evidence on the impact of monoclonal antibodies as first-line treatment in Spain is limited. This observational, retrospective and prospective, multicenter, descriptive study included 117 transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (TIE-NDMM) patients divided into Group A, who received no daratumumab standard regimens, and the DVMP group (daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone treatment). More than 90% of the patients in Group A received bortezomib, lenalidomide, or a combination of them. The median follow-up time for Group A was 38.2 months in comparison to 25.8 months for the DVMP group (p < 0.0001). The rate of DVMP patients that experienced disease progression or death from any cause was 36.8%, compared to 67.3% of Group A patients at 36 months of follow-up. The DVMP group had a higher 36-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (52.9% vs. 31.7%). During the retrospective period, 73.0% of patients reported adverse drug reactions, while in the prospective period, 40.5% experienced adverse events, with no clinical differences between groups. The study supports the use of daratumumab regimens in frontline therapy based on real-world data. The findings provide valuable insights into the clinical outcomes of daratumumab therapy, which can help physicians make informed decisions regarding the optimal treatment approach for this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have revolutionized multiple myeloma (MM) treatment. However, post-marketing data on their neuropsychiatric safety are limited. This study aimed to evaluate neuropsychiatric adverse events (AEs) related to mAbs used for MM through a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) from 2015 to 2023 with at least one neuropsychiatric AE and one of the MM-approved mAbs as the suspected drug (i.e., daratumumab, elotuzumab, isatuximab, belantamab mafodotin, teclistamab, elranatamab, and talquentamab) were analyzed using descriptive and disproportionality approaches. Results: Unknown signals of disproportionate reporting (SDR) included the following: cerebral infarction for daratumumab (n = 45; reporting odds ratio (ROR) = 2.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.79–3.21; information component (IC) = 1.54, IC025–IC075 = 1.05–1.9), elotuzumab (25; 7.61, 5.13–11.28; 3.03, 2.37–3.51), and isatuximab (10; 2.56, 1.38–4.76; 1.67, 0.59–2.4); mental status changes for daratumumab (40; 2.66, 1.95–3.63; 1.67, 1.14–2.04) and belantamab mafodotin (10; 4.23, 2.28–7.88; 2.3, 1.22–3.03); an altered state of consciousness for daratumumab (32; 1.97, 1.39–2.78; 1.32, 0.73–1.74) and belantamab mafodotin (6; 2.35, 1.05–5.23; 1.6, 0.19–2.52); Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) for daratumumab (23; 6.42, 4.26–9.69; 2.81, 2.11–3.3), isatuximab (8; 10.72, 5.35–21.48; 3.57, 2.35–4.37), and elotuzumab (3; 4.74, 1.53–14.7; 2.59, 0.52–3.8); and orthostatic intolerance for daratumumab (10; 12.54, 6.71–23.43; 3.75, 2.67–4.48) and elotuzumab (4; 28.31, 10.58–75.73; 5, 3.24–6.08). Conclusions: Our analysis highlighted several previously unacknowledged SDRs for MM-approved mAbs. Given the complex and not entirely understood etiology of some neuropsychiatric AEs, including GBS, further investigations are necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The roles of Lenalidomide (Len) and Daratumumab (Dara) in multiple myeloma treatment are well-established, yet their influences on hematopoietic stem cell harvesting and reconstitution remain disputed. Methods: We conducted a systematic database review to identify cohort studies or RCTs evaluating the effect of the use of Len or Dara on hematopoietic stem cell collection and peripheral blood count recovery in multiple myeloma patients. Effects on hematopoietic collection or reconstitution were estimated by comparing standardized mean differences (SMD) and mean differences (MD), or median differences. Results: Eighteen relevant studies were identified, summarizing mobilization results. For Len, data from 13 studies were summarized, including total CD34+ cell yield, collection failure rate, and time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment. Results indicated that Len exposure led to decreased stem cell collection [SMD=-0.23, 95% CI (-0.34, -0.12)]. However, collection failure (<2×106) could be mitigated by plerixafor [OR=2.14, 95% CI (0.96, 4.77)]. For Dara, two RCTs and three cohort studies were included, showing that Dara exposure resulted in a reduction in total stem cells even with optimized plerixafor mobilization [SMD=-0.75, 95% CI (-1.26, -0.23)], and delayed platelet engraftment recovery [MD=1.20, 95% CI (0.73, 1.66)]. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis offers a comprehensive view of Len and Dara's impacts on hematopoietic stem cell collection and reconstitution in multiple myeloma. Len usage could lead to reduced stem cell collection, counteracted by plerixafor mobilization. Dara usage could result in diminished stem cell collection and delayed platelet engraftment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable cancer in the bone marrow. The treatment of MM has developed significantly during the last 20 years, which has resulted in increased survival. Daratumumab is the first CD38 antibody approved for the treatment of MM. It has improved the treatment of MM even further. This is an evaluation of the modes of action of daratumumab and a description of the development of resistance with a focus on inhibitory checkpoint receptors on CD8+ T‐cells, complement activation and extracellular vesicles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Daratumumab (DARA) plus bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-VTd) represent the standard of induction care in Europe for autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT)-eligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. This study aimed to investigate the possible impact of D-VTd induction therapy on hematopoietic engraftment after auto-SCT. Our findings indicate that patients treated with D-VTd experienced longer neutrophil and platelet engraftment times than those treated with VTd. Additionally, D-VTd treatment was associated with a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia and grade 2 or higher diarrhea. However, no significant differences were observed in the median number of days to discharge. The conclusion we can draw from our real-life study is that a four-drug induction therapy containing DARA does not impact transplant safety outcomes. Background: This real-life study aimed to investigate the possible impact of D-VTd induction therapy on hematopoietic engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT). Methods: Sixty consecutive NDMM patients received four cycles of induction therapy with D-VTd. The conditioning regimen consisted of melphalan 200 mg/m2. These patients were compared with a historical control group of 80 patients who received four cycles of VTd as induction therapy. Results: The median days to reach neutrophil and platelet engraftment significantly differed between patients treated with D-VTd (11 and 13 days, respectively) and VTd (10 and 12 days). Univariate Cox analyses show that patients treated with D-VTd had a hazard ratio of neutrophil engraftment that was 42% significantly lower than those in the VTd arm (HR: 0.58, p = 0.002), and a multivariate model confirmed this result. Patients treated with D-VTd developed FN more frequently. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions revealed an association between D-VTd and FN. Delayed engraftment did not correlate with more extended hospitalization. No patients died in the first six months after transplantation. Conclusions: Our real-life study showed that a four-drug induction therapy containing DARA does not impact transplant safety outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study evaluates the HYDRASHIFT assay's effectiveness in mitigating daratumumab interference on serum protein tests during multiple myeloma (MM) treatment, aiming to ensure an accurate assessment of treatment response. We analyzed 113 serum samples from 68 MM patients undergoing daratumumab treatment, employing both standard IF and the HYDRASHIFT assay. The assay's precision was determined through intra-day and inter-day variability assessments, while its specificity was verified using serum samples devoid of daratumumab. Comparative analysis of IF results, before and after the application of the HYDRASHIFT assay, facilitated the categorization of treatment responses in alignment with the International Myeloma Working Group's response criteria. The precision underscored the assay's consistent repeatability and reproducibility, successfully eliminating interference of daratumumab-induced Gκ bands. Specificity assessments demonstrated the assay's capability to distinguish daratumumab from both isatuximab and naturally occurring M-proteins. Of the analyzed cases, 91 exhibited successful migration of daratumumab-induced Gκ bands, thereby enhancing the accuracy of treatment response classification. The remaining 22 cases did not show a visible migration complex, likely due to the low concentration of daratumumab in the serum. These findings underscore the assay's critical role in distinguishing daratumumab from endogenous M-protein, particularly in samples with a single Gκ band on standard IF, where daratumumab and endogenous M-protein had co-migrated. The HYDRASHIFT assay demonstrates high precision, specificity, and utility in the accurate monitoring of treatment responses in MM patients receiving daratumumab. This assay represents a significant advancement in overcoming the diagnostic challenges posed by daratumumab interference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study is to analyze the profile of patients receiving daratumumab and their presentation to the transfusion laboratory by looking at the different pre-transfusion policies and the risk of erythrocyte alloimmunization. Patients receiving daratumumab from 2018 to 2023 were reviewed. They were divided into two groups: Group I, presented before administration of daratumumab, and Group II, presented after drug administration. Appropriate strategies were applied to mitigate the drug interference, and the transfusion outcome was analyzed by following up with the patients for six months. A total of 48 patients were studied. The antibody screen was negative in patients who presented before the administration of daratumumab (n = 35). Extended phenotyping was done for 31 patients. Blood group genotyping was done for 4 patients. The patients who presented after daratumumab administration (n = 13) had a positive antibody screen that became negative with dithiothreitol-treated cells. A total of 261 red cell units were transfused to these patients (mean 5.55 units per patient). None of the patients developed antibodies during the follow-up period. The transfusion services must frame policies and protocols to mitigate drug interference. Good communication between transfusion services and clinical hematologists is a must to ensure safe transfusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Anti‐CD38 therapeutic modalities (e.g., daratumumab) can impede classical CD38 and CD138 gating use for plasma cell (PC) detection in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with minimal residual disease (MRD). We assessed the applicability of CD229, CD269, and interferon regulatory factor (IRF‐4) for PC detection in MM MRD patients.Bone marrow samples were collected from patients with MM. Through multiparameter flow cytometry, we evaluated the suitability of CD229, CD269, and IRF‐4 for distinguishing PCs from other hematopoietic cells and compared their expression pattern on normal PCs (nPCs) and aberrant PCs (aPCs). We also assessed IRF‐4 expression stability after sample storage under different conditions. A 10‐color MRD antibody panel was used to determine whether IRF‐4 is an alternative primary PC‐gating marker for MM MRD assessment.IRF‐4 was expressed specifically on all PCs; its mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was highest on PCs among all hematopoietic cells. This MFI did not decrease even after sample storage at 4°C or 25°C for 72 h. In all 42 MRD assessment samples, except for samples (n = 10) with no PCs, the use of IRF‐4 enabled accurate nPC (n = 12), aPC (n = 13), and nPC + aPC (n = 7) identification. Even samples from daratumumab‐treated patients had high IRF‐4 MFI, with no difference between pre‐treatment and post‐treatment (n = 7; p = 0.610).IRF‐4 demonstrates high MFI on PCs, and it is not expressed on other leukocytes. In MM patients with MRD, daratumumab treatment does not affect IRF‐4 expression. IRF‐4 is a promising marker for PC identification in MRD assessment of MM patients undergoing anti‐CD38 therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy approved for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In the phase 3 trial, CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827), cilta-cel demonstrated improved efficacy vs. standard of care (SOC; daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone [DPd] or pomalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone [PVd]) with a ≥ complete response (≥CR) rate of 73.1% vs. 21.8%. Methods: A cost-per-responder model was developed to assess the value of cilta-cel and SOC (87% DPd and 13% PVd) based on the CARTITUDE-4 trial data from a US mixed payer perspective (76.7% commercial, 23.3% Medicare). The model was developed using progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and ≥CR endpoints from CARTITUDE-4 over a period of 25.4 months. Inpatient stays, outpatient visits, drug acquisition, administration, and monitoring costs were included. The base-case model assumed an inpatient setting for each cilta-cel infusion; another scenario included 30% outpatient and 70% inpatient infusions. Costs of managing grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) and grade 1-4 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity were included. Subsequent therapy costs were incurred after disease progression; terminal care costs were considered upon death events. Outcomes included total cost per treated patient, total cost per complete responder, and cost per month in PFS between cilta-cel and SOC. Costs were adjusted to 2024 US dollars. Results: Total cost per treated patient, total cost per complete responder, and total cost per month in PFS were estimated at $704,641, $963,941, and $30,978 for cilta-cel, respectively, and $840,730, $3,856,559, and $42,520 for SOC over the 25.4-month period. Cost drivers included treatment acquisition costs before progression and subsequent treatment costs ($451,318 and $111,637 for cilta-cel; $529,795 and $265,167 for SOC). A scenario analysis in which 30% of patients received an outpatient infusion (assuming the same payer mix) showed a lower cost per complete responder for cilta-cel ($956,523) than those with an infusion in the inpatient setting exclusively. Discussion: This analysis estimated that cost per treated patient, cost per complete responder, and cost per month in PFS for cilta-cel were remarkably lower than for DPd or PVd, highlighting the substantial clinical and economic benefit of cilta-cel for patients with RRMM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To provide real-world data on patient perceptions and experiences with subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV) daratumumab. Patients and Methods: This was a cross-sectional, mixed-method (qualitative/quantitative) survey conducted in France, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom involving multiple myeloma (MM) patients who switched from IV to SC daratumumab in the last 12 months (qualitative phase) or 24 months (quantitative phase [26 months in the UK]) prior to enrollment in the study. Results: Nine patients (mean age 65 years) participated in the qualitative phase and 113 patients (mean age 65.1 years) in the quantitative phase. Qualitative study results provided insights for the quantitative study and highlighted the benefits of switching from daratumumab IV to daratumumab SC as an improvement and a satisfactory change in patients' treatment journey. Quantitative survey showed that patients were significantly less anxious, stressed and nervous before SC injections than IV infusions (mean score: 1.3, 1.1, 1.4 versus 2.1, 2.0, 2.0 respectively, p< 0.001), and significantly more reassured, ready/well-prepared, usual self and relieved (mean score: 3.8, 4.3, 3.7, 3.6 versus 3.0, 3.6, 3.1, 3.0 respectively, p< 0.001). Immediately after SC first injection, 96.5% patients were feeling well or very well versus 77.9% immediately after IV first infusion (p< 0.001). 97.3% patients were satisfied with their SC treatment versus 89.4% for the IV injection (p< 0.001). Patients spent significantly less time in hospital for an SC injection of daratumumab than for an IV infusion, 1.5 hours and 5.0 hours respectively (p< 0.001). In the UK, the differences between the two administration forms were less visible, likely because of confounding factors including a longer time passed since the switch from the IV to the SC form and administration of the survey. Conclusion: In line with results from other studies, the SC form of daratumumab had less impact on patients' emotional burden than the IV form. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: In Australia, bortezomib‐based induction (V‐IND) is used in >90% of newly diagnosed transplant‐eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Four cycles of V‐IND with bortezomib–cyclophosphamide–dexamethasone or bortezomib–lenalidomide–dexamethasone are available via the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients who demonstrate suboptimal response or who are refractory to V‐IND demonstrate inferior survival, representing a subgroup of MM where an unmet need persists. We evaluated an early, response‐adapted approach in these patients by switching to an intensive sequential therapeutic strategy incorporating daratumumab–lenalidomide–dexamethasone‐based (DRd) salvage, high‐dose melphalan ASCT followed by DRd consolidation and R maintenance. The overall response rate following four cycles of DRd salvage was 72% (95% credible interval: 57.9–82.4); prespecified, dual, Bayesian proof‐of‐concept criteria were met. Euro‐flow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity was 46% in the intention‐to‐treat population and 79% in the evaluable population following 12 cycles of DRd consolidation. At the 24‐month follow‐up, median progression‐free survival and overall survival were not reached. DRd salvage was well tolerated with grade 3 and 4 events reported in 24% and 8% respectively. Response‐adapted DRd combined with ASCT achieves high rates of MRD negativity and durable disease control in this functional high‐risk group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AvWS) is a rare entity with approximately 700 cases described in the literature. A number of etiologies are responsible for this condition, mainly lymphoproliferative, myeloproliferative syndromes and cardiac diseases. Management is aimed at preventing and treating bleeds, as well as treating the underlying pathology. In the case of a monoclonal gammopathy, there are limited evidence and high heterogeneity only based on old case reports, resulting in poor quality recommendations. It seems essential in 2023 to take into account and offer the new anti-myeloma treatments available. Case Presentation: We describe the case of a patient with an AvWS secondary to an IgG smoldering multiple myeloma, experiencing multiple bleeding, treated successfully with daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, after multiple treatment failure. Conclusion: Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone was demonstrated as a rapid and effective treatment for a patient with severe AvWS and multiple bleeding complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Monoclonal antibody (MoAb) therapy has been increasingly used in recent years for hematologic malignancies. The MoAbs anti-CD38 and anti-CD47 are immunoglobulins directed against epitopes that are highly expressed not only on cancer cells, but also on red blood cells (RBCs), as well as platelets. Additionally, producing an off-target effect interferes in pre-transfusion testing, having the potential to unchain hemolytic anemia. Blood banks must assure the availability and safety of blood products for patients in need. Thus, MoAbs have become a challenge for blood banks, since methods to overcome interferences must be adopted. Several strategies have been proposed to mitigate pan-reactivity in pre-transfusion indirect antiglobulin tests, such as the treatment of reagent RBCs with enzymes or reducing agents, allogeneic RBC adsorptions, and drug-specific neutralization assays. All of these have some kind of limitation. This review summarizes the interferences of MoAbs in pre-transfusion testing, focusing on the available strategies to mitigate them in order to provide a safe transfusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We previously reported the structure, affinity, and anticancer activity of a bivalent bispecific natural killer cell engager (BiKE) composed of one anti-CD16a VHH and one anti-HER2 VHH fused via a linker. In this study, we explored the engineering of a tetravalent BiKE by fusing two anti-CD16a and two anti-HER2 VHHs in tandem, using bivalent BiKE as a template. The tetravalent BiKE was genetically engineered, and its tertiary structure was predicted using in silico modeling. The antigen binding and affinity of the tetravalent BiKE were assessed using ELISA, flow cytometry, and biolayer interferometry. The ability of the BiKEs to kill cancer cells was evaluated through classical and residual antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) assays. Additionally, we investigated the potential for NK cell fratricide via CD16a-CD16a crosslinking. Our results revealed that the tetravalent BiKE exhibited at least 100-fold higher affinity toward its target antigens compared to its bivalent counterpart. The residual ADCC assay indicated that the tetravalent BiKE was more effective in killing cancer cells than the bivalent BiKE, attributable to its lower Koff value, which prolonged its binding to NK cell surfaces. Fratricide assays demonstrated that neither the bivalent nor the tetravalent BiKE mediated fratricide. Notably, our findings showed that daratumumab-induced NK fratricide was restricted to CD38-CD38 crosslinking and was not related to ADCC via CD16a-CD38 crosslinking. This study is the first in the literature to show the successful engineering of a tetravalent immune cell engager composed of tandem VHH units, which achieves high affinity and anticancer activity without mediating fratricide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Induction regimens using 4-drugs for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma have shown impressive results in multiple trials. However, trials of 4-drug regimens typically use a 3-drug regimen as their comparator, which limits our ability to determine whether the benefit is from the specific combination of drugs or just the addition of more agents. We performed a meta-analysis to compare all trials that compared 4-drug to 3-drug regimens and found that the addition of an anti-CD38 antibody (daratumumab or isatuximab) resulted in improved responses, while 4-drug regimens without an anti-CD38 antibody performed similarly to 3-drug regimens. While the addition of an anti-CD38 antibody led to increased adverse effects, these were predominantly mild and easily managed. These data suggest that an anti-CD38 antibody should be part of all 4-drug induction regimens for newly diagnosed myeloma patients. The use of 4-drug induction regimens for treatment naïve newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) is associated with improved depth of response and progression-free survival (PFS). However, head-to-head trials of 4-drug combinations are lacking, and instead, these regimens are typically compared to 3-drug backbones; limiting the ability to discern whether any additional benefit (or toxicity) is simply additive or represents a synergy (or interaction). We conducted a meta-analysis of phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials that randomized treatment naïve NDMM patients to either a 4-drug or 3-drug induction regimen. We included 11 trials which represented 6509 unique patients. PFS for all trials in the meta-analysis was 54 months with a 4-drug induction and 8.9 months with a 3-drug induction (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.45; 0.54), but there was no benefit to using a 4-drug induction that did not include an anti-CD38 antibody (PFS 4-drug 8.1 months, PFS 3-drug 8.0 months; HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.86; 1.06). Adverse events were more frequent with the quadruplet regimens but were predominately mild. High-grade (≥3) adverse events (AEs) that were more common with 4-drug regimens were infections (RR: 1.34; 95% CI 1.17; 1.54) and thrombocytopenia (RR: 1.39; 95% CI 1.12; 1.74). This study suggests that 4-drug induction regimens which include an anti-CD38 antibody improve efficacy although with additional toxicity in NDMM patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Daratumumab's incorporation in the upfront treatment of light chain (AL) amyloidosis has led to daratumumab (dara) refractoriness early in disease course. Patients who experience relapse or have suboptimal response to dara-based-therapy, have limited options. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of venetoclax-based therapy in t(11;14) positive AL patients who previously failed dara. Methods: Thirty-one patients with AL were included in this bi-institutional retrospective analysis. Results: Dara failure was due to inadequate response in 20 (65%) patients, haematologic relapse in 7 (22%), and both haematologic plus organ relapse in 4 (13%). Overall haematologic response rate to venetoclax-based therapy was 97%, with ≥ VGPR being 91%. Of the 19 evaluable patients with cardiac involvement, 14 (74%) achieved organ response. Of the 13 evaluable patients with renal involvement, 6 (46%) achieved organ response. With a median follow-up of 22 months, median time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The 12- and 24-month TTNT rates were 74% and 56%, respectively. At data-cut-off, four patients had died, all from AL-related organ complications. The 12- and 24-month OS rates were 89% and 85%, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 26% of patients, with 6% due to infections. Conclusion: These findings are encouraging for the use of venetoclax as salvage therapy post-dara failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

TEMPI syndrome is a rare, acquired disorder with multisystemic manifestations. It is classified as a plasma cell disorder and is characterized by telangiectasias, erythrocytosis, monoclonal gammopathy, perinephric fluid collections and intrapulmonary shunt. Even though TEMPI's pathophysiology remains elusive, it responds to anti-myeloma therapy indicating that the monoclonal protein or clone plays a key role. We present a challenging case of a 73-year-old man with erythrocytosis and deteriorating renal function with nephrotic-range proteinuria in whom after extensive work up, the diagnosis of TEMPI syndrome was made. He was received treatment with daratumumab-bortezomib-cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (Dara-VCD) and achieved a hematological and clinical response. We also report preliminary data on a multiplex assay for cytokines and growth factors for two patients with TEMPI syndrome and note lower levels for non-specific innate immunity related cytokines. A direct link between renal impairment and TEMPI syndrome is not currently established; cytokine deregulation could potentially be involved in the ischemic changes observed in the renal biopsy of our patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Daratumumab-hyaluronidase-fihj (Dara-SQ) is frequently used in the treatment of plasma cell disorders and is associated with improved outcomes. Dara-SQ was shown to be non-inferior to intravenous daratumumab (Dara-IV) in efficacy, safety, and associated with fewer administration-related reactions (ARRs). Despite the lower ARR risk with Dara-SQ, package labeling still recommends indefinite premedication. In this study, we investigated the safety of premedication discontinuation after one cycle of Dara-SQ. Materials and Methods This pre-post interventional quality improvement study included all patients aged 18 years and older diagnosed with multiple myeloma or light chain (AL) amyloidosis who received at least one dose of Dara-SQ. Patients in Arm 1 received Dara-SQ per package labeling, while patients in Arm 2 had premedication omitted (excluding dexamethasone) after cycle 1. The primary endpoint was the incidence of ARR after cycle 1. Overall ARR rate and therapy time saved were also evaluated. Results A total of 102 patients (63 in Arm 1 and 39 in Arm 2) were included. There were zero reactions in either arm after cycle 1 across 1479 Dara-SQ doses administered over a 30-month period with or without premedication omission. The overall ARR rate was 2.9% (3/102), which all occurred prior to premedication omission. Therapy timed saved from premedication omission was 194 hours in a 6-month period, equating to approximately $140 000 USD. Conclusion ARRs to Dara-SQ were rare, mild, and occurred during cycle 1 prior to premedication omission. Omission of noncorticosteroid premedication is safe, feasible, and carries substantial time and cost savings for patients and infusion centers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lidan Yi,1,&ast; Qiao Liu,1,&ast; Chongqing Tan,1 Xiaomin Wan,1 Xia Luo,1 Yinbo Li,2 Haiying Li,3 Xiaohui Zeng3 1Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China; 2Hunan Center for Drug Evaluation and Adverse Reaction Monitoring, Hunan Provincial Food and Drug Administration, Changsha, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Nuclear Medicine/PET Image Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xiaohui Zeng; Haiying Li, Email zengxiaohui2008@csu.edu.cn; lihaiying2013@csu.edu.cnObjective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of adding daratumumab to carfilzomib and dexamethasone (KdD) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).Materials and Methods: A Markov model was established to estimate health and economic outcomes of carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) with or without daratumumab for RRMM patients over a lifetime horizon. The patients and intervention of the two arms were modeled according to the CANDOR trial. Costs were collected from the Chinese health system perspective. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate the robustness of our conclusions.Results: Compared with the Kd arm, KdD achieved an additional 0.537 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an incremental cost of &dollar;138,084, resulting in an incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) of &dollar;257,319 per QALY. Uncertainty analyses revealed that the model is robust to all the input parameters.Conclusion: From the Chinese healthcare system perspective, adding daratumumab to the Kd regimen for patients with RRMM appears to lack cost-effectiveness. Exploring alternative avenues such as negotiating for a more favorable price or introducing a financial assistance program dedicated to daratumumab and/or carfilzomib could prove to be an effective strategy in enhancing accessibility of this combination.Keywords: cost-effectiveness, daratumumab, multiple myeloma, Markov model, China