Search

It is arguable whether this study is a clear example of drug repurposing, since patients had comorbid insomnia in addition to the diagnosis of MDD, making it impossible to distinguish different drug mechanisms from overlapping disease mechanisms. During clinical trials, dosing that leads to an acceptable interval of plasma drug concentrations is partly determined by the drug's safety profile. [Extracted from the article]

Further evidence that a drug-drug interaction may have been responsible for the reduction in seizure frequency was also pointed out to the NEJM based on other analyses. After being approached, NEJM replied in a response to the submitting team of clinical pharmacologists that the point of a possible drug-drug interaction had already been made by others, referring to the letter by Tang et al, and that they were not interested in publishing the manuscript. Surprisingly, GW Research Ltd and Devinsky et al were also involved in the initiation of a trial about possible drug-drug interactions between CBD and clobazam (NCT02565108),[14] that was noted in their study protocol, completed in 2016 but which is not in the public domain. Drug-drug interaction between clobazam and cannabidiol in children with refractory epilepsy. [Extracted from the article]

Aim Xen2174 is a synthetic 13-amino acid peptide that binds specifically to the norepinephrine transporter, which results in inhibition of norepinephrine uptake. It is being developed as a possible treatment for moderate to severe pain and is delivered intrathecally. The current study was performed to assess the pharmacodynamics (PD) and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacokinetics (PK) of Xen2174 in healthy subjects. Methods This was a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study in healthy subjects. The study was divided into three treatment arms. Each group consisted of eight subjects on active treatment and two or three subjects on placebo. The CSF was sampled for 32 h using an intrathecal catheter. PD assessments were performed using a battery of nociceptive tasks (electrical pain, pressure pain and cold pressor tasks). Results Twenty-five subjects were administered Xen2174. CSF PK analysis showed a higher area under the CSF concentration-time curve of Xen2174 in the highest dose group than allowed by the predefined safety margin based on nonclinical data. The most common adverse event was post-lumbar puncture syndrome, with no difference in incidence between treatment groups. Although no statistically significant differences were observed in the PD assessments between the different dosages of Xen2174 and placebo, pain tolerability in the highest dose group was higher than in the placebo group [contrast least squares mean pressure pain tolerance threshold of Xen2174 2.5 mg-placebo (95% confidence interval), 22.2% (−5.0%, 57.1%); P = 0.1131]. Conclusions At the Xen2174 dose level of 2.5 mg, CSF concentrations exceeded the prespecified exposure limit based on the nonclinical safety margin. No statistically significant effects on evoked pain tests were observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, nasal tolerance and effects on sedation of a highly concentrated aqueous intranasal midazolam formulation (Nazolam) and to compare these to intravenous midazolam. Methods In this four-way crossover, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 16 subjects received 2.5 mg Nazolam, 5.0 mg Nazolam, 2.5 mg intravenous midazolam or placebo on different occasions. Pharmacokinetics of midazolam and α-hydroxy-midazolam were characterized and related to outcome variables for sedation (saccadic peak velocity, the Bond and Lader visual analogue scale for sedation, the simple reaction time task and the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation). Nasal tolerance was evaluated through subject reporting, and ear, nose and throat examination. Results Nazolam bioavailability was 75%. Maximal plasma concentrations of 31 ng ml−1 (CV, 42.3%) were reached after 11 min (2.5 mg Nazolam), and of 66 ng ml−1 (coefficient of variability, 31.5%) after 14 min (5.0 mg Nazolam). Nazolam displayed a significant effect on OAA/S scores. Sedation onset (based on SPV change) occurred 1 ± 0.7 min after administration of 2.5 mg intravenous midazolam, 7 ± 4.4 min after 2.5 mg Nazolam, and 4 ± 1.8 min after 5 mg Nazolam. Sedation duration was 118 ± 95.6 min for 2.5 mg intravenous midazolam, 76 ± 80.4 min for 2.5 mg Nazolam, and 145 ± 104.9 min for 5.0 mg Nazolam. Nazolam did not lead to nasal mucosa damage. Conclusions This study demonstrates the nasal tolerance, safety and efficacy of Nazolam. When considering the preparation time needed for obtaining venous access, conscious sedation can be achieved in the same time span as needed for intravenous midazolam. Nazolam may offer important advantages in conscious sedation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A pharmacologic challenge model with a nicotinic antagonist could be an important tool not only to understand the complex role of the nicotinic cholinergic system in cognition, but also to develop novel compounds acting on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. The objective was to develop a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model using nonlinear mixed effects (NLME) methods to quantitate the pharmacokinetics of three oral mecamylamine doses (10, 20 and 30 mg) and correlate the plasma concentrations to the pharmacodynamic effects on a cognitive and neurophysiologic battery of tests in healthy subjects. A one-compartment linear kinetic model best described the plasma concentrations of mecamylamine. Mecamylamine's estimated clearance was 0.28 ± 0.015 L min-1. The peripheral volume of distribution (291 ± 5.15 L) was directly related to total body weight. Mecamylamine impaired the accuracy and increased the reaction time in tests evaluating short term working memory with a steep increase in the concentration-effect relationship at plasma concentrations below 100 μg L-1. On the other hand, mecamylamine induced a decrease in performance of tests evaluating visual and fine motor coordination at higher plasma concentrations (EC50 97 μg L-1). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased exponentially after a plasma mecamylamine concentration of 80 μg L-1, a known effect previously poorly studied in healthy subjects. The developed mecamylamine PKPD model was used to quantify the effects of nicotinic blockade in a set of neurophysiological tests in humans with the goal to provide insight into the physiology and pharmacology of the nicotinic system in humans and the possibility to optimize future trials that use mecamylamine as a pharmacological challenge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Human evoked pain models can be used to determine the efficacy of new and existing analgesics and to aid in the identification of new targets. Aspects of neuropathic pain can be simulated by inducing hyperalgesia resulting from provoked sensitization. The present literature review aimed to provide insight into the sensitivity of different hyperalgesia and allodynia models of pharmacological treatment. Methods A literature search was performed to identify randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that included human hyperalgesia pain models and investigated the pharmacodynamic effects of different classes of drugs. Results Three hyperalgesia models [ultraviolet B (UVB) irradiation, capsaicin and thermode burn] have been used extensively. Assessment of hyperalgesia/allodynia and pharmacological effect are measured using challenge tests, which generally comprise thermal (heat/cold) or mechanical stimulation (pin-prick, stroking or impact). The UVB model was sensitive to the antihyperalgesic effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids. The capsaicin model was partially sensitive to opioids. The burn model did not detect any antihyperalgesic effects when NSAIDs or local anaesthetics were administered but responded to the effects of N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists by moderately reducing mechanical hyperalgesia. Conclusions Based on pharmacological sensitivity, the UVB model adequately reflects inflammatory pain and was sensitive to NSAIDs and opioids. Findings from the capsaicin and burn models raised questions about the translatability of these models to the treatment of neuropathic pain. There is a need for a reproducible and predictive model of neuropathic pain, either in healthy subjects or in patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recently, Verberk et al showed that plasma A 42/A 40 ratio has potential to identify Alzheimer pathological changes in subjects with subjective memory decline.[1] Furthermore, the inclusion of age and APOE 4 carriership in their multivariate model improved the likelihood of identification. Based on these results, Verberk and colleagues postulated that plasma A 42/A 40 ratio could be a potential prescreener to identify the earliest Alzheimer disease (AD) pathological changes in individuals with subjective memory decline. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction/Aims: Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) detects small nerve fiber loss and correlates with skin biopsy findings in diabetic neuropathy. In chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP) this correlation is unknown. Therefore, we compared CCM and skin biopsy in patients with CIAP to healthy controls, patients with painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) and diabetics without overt neuropathy (DM). Methods: Participants with CIAP and suspected small fiber neuropathy (n = 15), PDN (n = 16), DM (n = 15), and healthy controls (n = 16) underwent skin biopsy and CCM testing. Inter‐center intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for CCM parameters. Results: Compared with healthy controls, patients with CIAP and PDN had significantly fewer nerve fibers in the skin (IENFD: 5.7 ± 2.3, 3.0 ± 1.8, 3.9 ± 1.5 fibers/mm, all p <.05). Corneal nerve parameters in CIAP (fiber density 23.8 ± 4.9 no./mm2, branch density 16.0 ± 8.8 no./mm2, fiber length 13.1 ± 2.6 mm/mm2) were not different from healthy controls (24.0 ± 6.8 no./mm2, 22.1 ± 9.7 no./mm2, 13.5 ± 3.5 mm/mm2, all p >.05). In patients with PDN, corneal nerve fiber density (17.8 ± 5.7 no./mm2) and fiber length (10.5 ± 2.7 mm/mm2) were reduced compared with healthy controls (p <.05). CCM results did not correlate with IENFD in CIAP patients. Inter‐center ICC was 0.77 for fiber density and 0.87 for fiber length. Discussion: In contrast to patients with PDN, corneal nerve parameters were not decreased in patients with CIAP and small nerve fiber damage. Therefore, CCM is not a good biomarker for small nerve fiber loss in CIAP patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Phosphodiesterase 2 (PDE2) regulates intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate and guanosine monophosphate (cAMP/cGMP) levels, which contribute to processes crucial for learning and memory. BI 474121, a potent and selective PDE2 inhibitor, is in development for treating cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia. Methods: The effects of BI 474121 on cGMP concentrations were first assessed in rat cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to demonstrate central nervous system (CNS) and functional target engagement. Next, a Phase I study in healthy participants assessed the pharmacokinetics of BI 474121 in CSF vs. plasma, the pharmacodynamics of BI 474121 by measuring cGMP concentrations in the CSF, and the safety of BI 474121. Results: In rats, BI 474121 was associated with a dose‐dependent increase (71% at the highest dose tested [3.0 mg kg−1]) in cGMP levels in the CSF relative to vehicle (P < 0.001). In healthy participants, the maximum‐measured concentration CSF‐to‐plasma ratio for BI 474121 exposure was similar following single oral doses of BI 474121 2.5, 10, 20 and 40 mg (dose‐adjusted geometric mean: 8.96% overall). BI 474121 2.5–40 mg administration in healthy participants also increased cGMP levels in CSF (maximum exposure‐related change from baseline ratio, BI 474121: 1.44–2.20 vs. placebo: 1.26). The most common treatment‐emergent adverse event (AE) was mild‐to‐moderate post‐lumbar puncture syndrome, which resolved with standard treatment. No AEs of special interest were observed. Conclusions: BI 474121 crosses the blood–brain barrier to inhibit PDE2, supporting cGMP as a translational marker to monitor CNS target engagement. These findings promote further clinical development of BI 474121. ClinicalTrials.gov number (NCT04672954). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

RIPK1 is a master regulator of inflammatory signaling and cell death and increased RIPK1 activity is observed in human diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). RIPK1 inhibition has been shown to protect against cell death in a range of preclinical cellular and animal models of diseases. SAR443060 (previously DNL747) is a selective, orally bioavailable, central nervous system (CNS)–penetrant, small‐molecule, reversible inhibitor of RIPK1. In three early‐stage clinical trials in healthy subjects and patients with AD or ALS (NCT03757325 and NCT03757351), SAR443060 distributed into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after oral administration and demonstrated robust peripheral target engagement as measured by a reduction in phosphorylation of RIPK1 at serine 166 (pRIPK1) in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells compared to baseline. RIPK1 inhibition was generally safe and well‐tolerated in healthy volunteers and patients with AD or ALS. Taken together, the distribution into the CSF after oral administration, the peripheral proof‐of‐mechanism, and the safety profile of RIPK1 inhibition to date, suggest that therapeutic modulation of RIPK1 in the CNS is possible, conferring potential therapeutic promise for AD and ALS, as well as other neurodegenerative conditions. However, SAR443060 development was discontinued due to long‐term nonclinical toxicology findings, although these nonclinical toxicology signals were not observed in the short duration dosing in any of the three early‐stage clinical trials. The dose‐limiting toxicities observed for SAR443060 preclinically have not been reported for other RIPK1‐inhibitors, suggesting that these toxicities are compound‐specific (related to SAR443060) rather than RIPK1 pathway‐specific. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dermal allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) administration and whole-body heat stress (WBHS) are two challenge models that are used to evaluate physiological mechanisms of vasodilation and pharmacological activity in humans. Their exact vasodilatory mechanisms in humans are not fully elucidated but are likely to be nitric oxide (NO)-mediated. This study aimed to evaluate whether there is overlap in the vasodilatory pathways of dermal AITC application and WBHS by combining the challenges. In this open-label interventional study, healthy volunteers underwent dermal administration of AITC twice: under basal conditions and during WBHS. Dermal blood flow (DBF) was non-invasively measured using laser speckle contrast imaging four times, once in each of the following situations: baseline, WBHS only, AITC only, and WBHS combined with AITC. A total of 12 male volunteers, aged 18– 61 years, participated in the study. Compared to baseline, following AITC application, their DBF increased by 63.43 AU (baseline: 32.55, 95% CI [17.78, 47.31] AU, AITC only: 95.97, 95% CI [81.21, 110.7] AU, p < 0.0001). During WBHS, the increase in DBF after AITC was 42.76 AU (WBHS only: 87.25, 95% CI [72.49, 102.0] AU, WBHS+AITC: 130.0, 95% CI [115.2, 144.8] AU, p < 0.0001). The combination of WBHS and AITC resulted in a lower DBF than the sum of the DBF responses to AITC and WBHS when applied separately (ED 20.67, 95% CI [− 3.532, 44.88], p = 0.0916). This might point towards the presence of an interaction in the vasodilatory mechanism of AITC application and WBHS, possibly indicating overlap in their NOS-driven vasodilatory pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Noradrenergic signaling declines in Parkinson's disease (PD) following locus coeruleus neurodegeneration. Epidemiologic studies demonstrate that β-acting drugs slow PD progression. Objective: The primary objective was to compare the safety and effects of 3 β-adrenoceptor (β-AR) acting drugs on central nervous system (CNS) function after a single dose in healthy volunteers (HVs) and evaluate the effects of multiple doses of β-AR acting drugs in HVs and PD-patients. Methods: In Part A, HVs received single doses of 32 mg salbutamol, 160μg clenbuterol, 60 mg pindolol and placebo administered in a randomized, 4-way cross-over study. In Part B (randomized cross-over) and Part C (parallel, 2:1 randomized), placebo and/or clenbuterol (20μg on Day 1, 40μg on Day 2, 80μg on Days 3–7) were administered. CNS functions were assessed using the NeuroCart test battery, including pupillometry, adaptive tracking and recall tests. Results: Twenty-seven HVs and 12 PD-patients completed the study. Clenbuterol improved and pindolol reduced the adaptive tracking and immediate verbal recall performance. Clenbuterol and salbutamol increased and pindolol decreased pupil-to-iris ratios. Clenbuterol was selected for Parts B and C. In Part B, clenbuterol significantly increased performance in adaptive tracking with a tendency toward improved performance in immediate and delayed verbal recall. In Part C trends toward improved performance in immediate and delayed verbal recall were observed in PD-patients. Typical cardiovascular peripheral β2-AR effects were observed with clenbuterol. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the pro-cognitive effects of clenbuterol in HVs with similar trends in PD-patients. The mechanism of action is likely activation of β2-ARs in the CNS. Plain Language Summary: Aims and Purpose of the Research: This research aimed to explore how three different drugs affect brain function. These drugs are salbutamol, clenbuterol, and pindolol and work in the brain by stimulating specific brain cells that can improve aspects like memory and coordination. The main question was to see how safe these drugs were and how they impact the brain function after one dose in healthy people, and after multiple doses in both healthy people and those with Parkinson's disease. Background of the Research: Parkinson's disease is a condition where brain cells start to die, which affects different areas of the brain, including movement function, as well as memory and attention. This research matters because finding drugs that affect the brain function could improve the lives of people with Parkinson's disease. Methods and Research Design: The study was conducted in three parts. In the first part, healthy volunteers took one dose of each of the three drugs— salbutamol, clenbuterol, and pindolol— as well as a placebo (a harmless pill that has no effect). The researchers tested the participants' brain functions using various tasks including memory tests and eye response measurements. In the second and third part, healthy people and people with Parkinson's disease took the drug that performed best in healthy volunteers for seven days. Results and Importance: In the first part, a single dose of clenbuterol was safe and improved memory and attentions tasks in healthy people, and therefore was chosen for further testing in the second and third part. In these parts, multiple doses of clenbuterol were safe and helped improve memory and attention tasks in healthy people, with similar positive trends seen in people with Parkinson's disease. The study suggests that clenbuterol might help improve brain function by activating specific receptors in the brain. These results are important because they suggest that clenbuterol could be a potential treatment to help improve brain function in people with Parkinson's disease. However, more research is needed to fully understand its effects and to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

C–C Motif Chemokine Ligand 17 (CCL17) is a chemokine that binds and signals through the G‐protein coupled CC‐chemokine receptor 4 and has been implicated in the development of inflammatory and arthritic pain. GSK3858279 is a high‐affinity, first‐in‐class, monoclonal antibody, binding specifically to CCL17 and inhibiting downstream signaling. In this phase I, randomized, single‐center, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, three‐period, incomplete‐block crossover study (NCT04114656), the analgesic effects and safety of intravenous GSK3858279 were assessed in a battery of evoked acute pain assessments on healthy, adult (aged ≥18 years), male participants. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either one placebo (0.9% w/v NaCl) dose followed by two GSK3858279 doses (PAA treatment sequence), or one GSK3858279 dose followed by two placebo doses (APP treatment sequence). The co‐primary end points were ultraviolet B heat pain detection threshold (°C), cold pressor time to pain tolerance threshold (PTT, sec), and electrical PTT (mA, single stimulus). Twenty‐one participants were enrolled (PAA = 11; APP = 10). Mean age (standard deviation) was 29.3 (7.9) years for PAA, 31.1 (7.7) years for APP. No significant differences were observed in the analgesic effect between GSK3858279 and placebo for any end point. Exposure to GSK3858279 was similar between Period 1 (APP sequence), and Periods 2 and 3 (PAA sequence), with some GSK3858279 carry‐over. Changes in serum CCL17 levels were consistent with the expected GSK3858279 activity. All drug‐related adverse events were mild in intensity and caused no discontinuations. The absence of an efficacy signal in this acute pain model does not preclude efficacy in chronic pain states. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dynamic balance assessments such as walking adaptability may yield a more realistic prediction of drug‐induced falls compared with postural stability measurements, as falls often result from limited gait adjustments when walking. The Interactive Walkway (IWW) measures walking adaptability but sensitivity to medication effects is unknown. If proven sensitive and specific, IWW could serve as a biomarker for targeted fall‐risk assessments in early clinical drug development. In this three‐way crossover study, 18 healthy elderly (age: 65–80 years) subjects received 5 mg zolpidem, 10 mg suvorexant, or placebo in the morning. Assessments were performed pre‐dose and approximately hourly until 9 h post‐dose. IWW assessments included an 8‐meter walking test, goal‐directed stepping, obstacle‐avoidance, and tandem‐walking. Other pharmacodynamic measurements were the Timed‐Up‐and‐Go (TUG) test at a comfortable and fast pace, adaptive tracking, and body sway. A decline in performance was observed for zolpidem compared with placebo for 3 h post‐dose in IWW walking adaptability outcome measures, TUG, adaptive tracking, and body sway. For the IWW tasks, a decrease in walking speed (among others) was observed. IWW parameters were not affected by suvorexant compared with placebo at any timepoint. However, an increase of 9.8% (95%CI: 1.8%, 18.5%) in body sway was observed for suvorexant compared with placebo up to 3 h post‐dose. The IWW successfully quantified drug effects of two hypnotic drugs and distinguished between zolpidem and suvorexant regarding their effects on walking. As a biomarker, the IWW demonstrated sensitivity in assessing dynamic balance and potential fall risk in early phase clinical drug development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Apomorphine, used to treat OFF episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), is typically administered via subcutaneous injections. Administration of an oromucosal solution could offer a non‐invasive and user‐friendly alternative. This two‐part clinical study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and dose proportionality of a novel apomorphine hydrochloride oromucosal solution, as well as its relative bioavailability to subcutaneous apomorphine injection and apomorphine sublingual film. In part A of the study, 12 patients with PD received 2 mg oromucosal apomorphine (4% weight/volume) and 2 mg subcutaneous apomorphine in a randomized order, followed by 4 and 8 mg oromucosal apomorphine. In part B of the study, 13 patients with PD received 7 mg oromucosal apomorphine (7% weight/volume) and 30 mg sublingual apomorphine in a randomized order, followed by 14 mg oromucosal apomorphine. Washout between dose administrations in both study parts was at least 2 days. Safety, tolerability, and PK were assessed pre‐ and post‐dose. Both study parts showed that oromucosal apomorphine was generally well‐tolerated. Observed side effects were typical for apomorphine administration and included asymptomatic orthostatic hypotension, yawning, fatigue, and somnolence. Oromucosal apomorphine exposure increased with dose, although less than dose proportional. The mean (SD) maximum exposure reached with 14 mg oromucosal apomorphine was 753.0 (298.6) ng*min/mL (area under the plasma concentration–time curve from zero to infinity) and 8.0 (3.3) ng/mL (maximum plasma concentration). This was comparable to exposure reached after 2 mg subcutaneous apomorphine and approximately half of the exposure observed with 30 mg sublingual apomorphine. In summary, clinically relevant plasma concentrations could be reached in PD patients without tolerability issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Dysfunction of nitric oxide‐soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC)–cyclic guanosine monophosphate signalling is implicated in the pathophysiology of cognitive impairment. Zagociguat is a central nervous system (CNS) penetrant sGC stimulator designed to amplify nitric oxide–cyclic guanosine monophosphate signalling in the CNS. This article describes a phase 1b study evaluating the safety and pharmacodynamic effects of zagociguat. Methods: In this randomized crossover study, 24 healthy participants aged ≥65 years were planned to receive 15 mg zagociguat or placebo once daily for 2 15‐day periods separated by a 27‐day washout. Adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory tests were conducted to assess safety. Pharmacokinetics of zagociguat were evaluated in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Pharmacodynamic assessments included evaluation of cerebral blood flow, CNS tests, pharmaco‐electroencephalography, passive leg movement and biomarkers in blood, CSF and brain. Results: Twenty‐four participants were enrolled; 12 participants completed both treatment periods, while the other 12 participants completed only 1 treatment period. Zagociguat was well‐tolerated and penetrated the blood–brain barrier, with a CSF/free plasma concentration ratio of 0.45 (standard deviation 0.092) measured 5 h after the last dose of zagociguat on Day 15. Zagociguat induced modest decreases in blood pressure. No consistent effects of zagociguat on other pharmacodynamic parameters were detected. Conclusion: Zagociguat was well‐tolerated and induced modest blood pressure reductions consistent with other sGC stimulators. No clear pharmacodynamic effects of zagociguat were detected. Studies in participants with proven reduced cerebral blood flow or CNS function may be an avenue for further evaluation of the compound. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drug development for mood disorders can greatly benefit from the development of robust, reliable, and objective biomarkers. The incorporation of smartphones and wearable devices in clinical trials provide a unique opportunity to monitor behavior in a non-invasive manner. The objective of this study is to identify the correlations between remotely monitored self-reported assessments and objectively measured activities with depression severity assessments often applied in clinical trials. 30 unipolar depressed patients and 29 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were enrolled in this study. Each participant's daily physiological, physical, and social activity were monitored using a smartphone-based application (CHDR MORE™) for 3 weeks continuously. Self-reported depression anxiety stress scale-21 (DASS-21) and positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) were administered via smartphone weekly and daily respectively. The structured interview guide for the Hamilton depression scale and inventory of depressive symptomatology–clinical rated (SIGHD-IDSC) was administered in-clinic weekly. Nested cross-validated linear mixed-effects models were used to identify the correlation between the CHDR MORE™ features with the weekly in-clinic SIGHD-IDSC scores. The SIGHD-IDSC regression model demonstrated an explained variance (R2) of 0.80, and a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of ± 15 points. The SIGHD-IDSC total scores were positively correlated with the DASS and mean steps-per-minute, and negatively correlated with the travel duration. Unobtrusive, remotely monitored behavior and self-reported outcomes are correlated with depression severity. While these features cannot replace the SIGHD-IDSC for estimating depression severity, it can serve as a complementary approach for assessing depression and drug effects outside the clinic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • We developed an EEG index sensitive to mecamylamine, for monitoring nicotinic cholinergic effects. • We demonstrate reversal of mecamylamine-induced EEG disturbances both with nicotine and galantamine. • The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor index could enable quantifying EEG effects of pro-cognitive cholinergic compounds. Abstract Objectives Cognitive impairment models are used in clinical studies aimed at proving pharmacology of drugs being developed for Alzheimer's disease and other cognitive disorders. Due to rising interest in nicotinic agonists, we aimed to establish a method to monitor neurophysiological effects of modulating the nicotinic cholinergic system. Methods In a four-way cross-over study, eyes-closed rest EEG was recorded in 28 healthy subjects receiving mecamylamine—a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) antagonist, which induces temporary cognitive dysfunction in healthy subjects—with co-administration of placebo, nicotine or galantamine. Results Using machine learning to optimally contrast the effects of 30 mg of mecamylamine and placebo on the brain, we developed a nAChR index that consists of 10 EEG biomarkers and shows high classification accuracy (∼95% non-cross-validated, ∼70% cross-validated). Importantly, using the nAChR index, we demonstrate reversal of mecamylamine-induced neurophysiological effects due to 16 mg of galantamine as well as administering 21 mg of nicotine transdermally. Conclusions Our findings indicate that the mecamylamine challenge model jointly with the nAChR index—a measure of the nicotinic EEG profile—could aid future proof-of-pharmacology studies to demonstrate effects of nicotinic cholinergic compounds. Significance This novel measure for quantifying nicotinic cholinergic effects on the EEG could serve as a useful tool in drug development of pro-cognitive compounds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) and its product, cyclic guanosine monophosphate, play a role in learning and memory formation. Zagociguat (CY6463) is a novel stimulator of sGC being developed for the treatment of neurodegenerative disease. Single zagociguat doses of 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 20, 30, and 50 mg were administered once to healthy participants in a single‐ascending‐dose phase; then zagociguat 2, 5, 10, and 15 mg was administered q.d. for 14 days in a multiple‐ascending‐dose phase; and, finally, zagociguat 10 mg was administered once in both fed and fasted state in a food‐interaction phase. Safety of zagociguat was evaluated by monitoring treatment‐emergent adverse events, suicide risk, vital signs, electrocardiography, and laboratory tests. Pharmacokinetics of zagociguat were assessed through blood, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid sampling. Pharmacodynamic effects of zagociguat were evaluated with central nervous system (CNS) tests and pharmaco‐electroencephalography. Zagociguat was well‐tolerated across all doses evaluated. Zagociguat exposures increased in a dose‐proportional manner. Median time to maximum concentration ranged from 0.8 to 5 h and mean terminal half‐life from 52.8 to 67.1 h. CNS penetration of the compound was confirmed by cerebrospinal fluid sampling. Zagociguat induced up to 6.1 mmHg reduction in mean systolic and up to 7.5 mmHg reduction in mean diastolic blood pressure. No consistent pharmacodynamic (PD) effects on neurocognitive function were observed. Zagociguat was well‐tolerated, CNS‐penetrant, and demonstrated PD activity consistent with other sGC stimulators. The results of this study support further development of zagociguat. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Increased leucine‐rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) kinase activity is an established risk factor for Parkinson's disease (PD), and several LRRK2 kinase inhibitors are in clinical development as potential novel disease‐modifying therapeutics. This biomarker characterization study explored within‐ and between‐subject variability of multiple LRRK2 pathway biomarkers (total LRRK2 [tLRRK2], phosphorylation of the serine 935 (Ser935) residue on LRRK2 [pS935], phosphorylation of Rab10 [pRab10], and total Rab10 [tRab10]) in different biological sources (whole blood, peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMCs], neutrophils) as candidate human target engagement and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for implementation in phase I/II pharmacological studies of LRRK2 inhibitors. PD patients with a LRRK2 mutation (n = 6), idiopathic PD patients (n = 6), and healthy matched control subjects (n = 10) were recruited for repeated blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling split over 2 days. Within‐subject variability (geometric coefficient of variation [CV], %) of these biomarkers was lowest in whole blood and neutrophils (range: 12.64%–51.32%) and considerably higher in PBMCs (range: 34.81%–273.88%). Between‐subject variability displayed a similar pattern, with relatively lower variability in neutrophils (range: 61.30%–66.26%) and whole blood (range: 44.94%–123.11%), and considerably higher variability in PBMCs (range: 189.60%–415.19%). Group‐level differences were observed with elevated mean pRab10 levels in neutrophils and a reduced mean pS935/tLRRK2 ratio in PBMCs in PD LRRK2‐mutation carriers compared to healthy controls. These findings suggest that the evaluated biomarkers and assays could be used to verify pharmacological mechanisms of action and help explore the dose–response of LRRK2 inhibitors in early‐phase clinical studies. In addition, comparable α‐synuclein aggregation in CSF was observed in LRRK2‐mutation carriers compared to idiopathic PD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Loss‐of‐function mutations in the GBA1 gene are one of the most common genetic risk factors for onset of Parkinson's disease and subsequent progression (GBA‐PD). GBA1 encodes the lysosomal enzyme glucocerebrosidase (GCase), a promising target for a possible first disease‐modifying therapy. LTI‐291 is an allosteric activator of GCase, which increases the activity of normal and mutant forms of GCase. Objectives: This first‐in‐patient study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of 28 daily doses of LTI‐291 in GBA‐PD. Methods: This was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial in 40 GBA‐PD participants. Twenty‐eight consecutive daily doses of 10, 30, or 60 mg of LTI‐291 or placebo were administered (n = 10 per treatment allocation). Glycosphingolipid (glucosylceramide and lactosylceramide) levels were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and a test battery of neurocognitive tasks, the Movement Disorder Society‐Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and the Mini‐Mental State Exam, were performed. Results: LTI‐291 was generally well tolerated, no deaths or treatment‐related serious adverse events occurred, and no participants withdrew due to adverse events. Cmax, and AUC0–6 of LTI‐291 increased in a dose‐proportional manner, with free CSF concentrations equal to the free fraction in plasma. A treatment‐related transient increase in intracellular glucosylceramide (GluCer) in PBMCs was measured. Conclusion: These first‐in‐patient studies demonstrated that LTI‐291 was well tolerated when administered orally for 28 consecutive days to patients with GBA‐PD. Plasma and CSF concentrations that are considered pharmacologically active were reached (ie, sufficient to at least double GCase activity). Intracellular GluCer elevations were detected. Clinical benefit will be assessed in a larger long‐term trial in GBA‐PD. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Central nervous system (CNS) disorders benefit from ongoing monitoring to assess disease progression and treatment efficacy. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies offer a means for the remote and continuous symptom monitoring of patients. Machine Learning (ML) techniques can process and engineer mHealth data into a precise and multidimensional biomarker of disease activity. Objective: This narrative literature review aims to provide an overview of the current landscape of biomarker development using mHealth technologies and ML. Additionally, it proposes recommendations to ensure the accuracy, reliability, and interpretability of these biomarkers. Methods: This review extracted relevant publications from databases such as PubMed, IEEE, and CTTI. The ML methods employed across the selected publications were then extracted, aggregated, and reviewed. Results: This review synthesized and presented the diverse approaches of 66 publications that address creating mHealth-based biomarkers using ML. The reviewed publications provide a foundation for effective biomarker development and offer recommendations for creating representative, reproducible, and interpretable biomarkers for future clinical trials. Conclusion: mHealth-based and ML-derived biomarkers have great potential for the remote monitoring of CNS disorders. However, further research and standardization of study designs are needed to advance this field. With continued innovation, mHealth-based biomarkers hold promise for improving the monitoring of CNS disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Molecules related to glucocerebrosidase (GCase) are potential biomarkers for development of compounds targeting GBA1‐associated Parkinson's disease (GBA‐PD). Objectives: Assessing variability of various glycosphingolipids (GSLs) in plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) across GBA‐PD, idiopathic PD (iPD), and healthy volunteers (HVs). Methods: Data from five studies were combined. Variability was assessed of glucosylceramide (various isoforms), lactosylceramide (various isoforms), glucosylsphingosine, galactosylsphingosine, GCase activity (using fluorescent 4‐methylumbeliferryl‐β‐glucoside), and GCase protein (using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay) in plasma, PBMCs, and CSF if available, in GBA‐PD, iPD, and HVs. GSLs in leukocyte subtypes were compared in HVs. Principal component analysis was used to explore global patterns in GSLs, clinical characteristics (Movement Disorder Society – Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part 3 [MDS‐UPDRS‐3], Mini‐Mental State Examination [MMSE], GBA1 mutation type), and participant status (GBA‐PD, iPD, HVs). Results: Within‐subject between‐day variability ranged from 5.8% to 44.5% and was generally lower in plasma than in PBMCs. Extracellular glucosylceramide levels (plasma) were slightly higher in GBA‐PD compared with both iPD and HVs, while intracellular levels were comparable. GSLs in the different matrices (plasma, PBMCs, CSF) did not correlate. Both lactosylceramide and glucosylsphingosine were more abundant in granulocytes compared with monocytes and lymphocytes. Absolute levels of GSL isoforms differed greatly. GBA1 mutation types could not be differentiated based on GSL data. Conclusions: Glucosylceramide can stably be measured over days in both plasma and PBMCs and may be used as a biomarker in clinical trials targeting GBA‐PD. Glucosylsphingosine and lactosylceramide are stable in plasma but are strongly affected by leukocyte subtypes in PBMCs. GBA‐PD could be differentiated from iPD and HVs, primarily based on glucosylceramide levels in plasma. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]