Search

Introduction: The first laparoscopic case of ileal interposition was reported in 2000, proving the feasibility of the procedure in a minimally invasive fashion by duplicating the principles of open surgery. Robotic applications in urology are expanding worldwide, given the unique features of the robotic platform, which facilitates more advanced laparoscopic procedures. In this study, we report a case of completely intracorporeal robotic ileal ureter and thoroughly describe our technique for this complex minimally invasive procedure., Technical Considerations: A 50-year-old gentleman with a history of right renal stones underwent multiple right ureteroscopies and thereafter developed 2 proximal ureteral strictures of 5 mm. Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was 71 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Renal scan showed preserved function. The treatment options were discussed, and the patient elected to undergo a robotic ileal ureter interposition. Total operative time was 7 hours, the estimated blood loss was approximately 50 mL, and the patient progressed to regular diet on postoperative day 4 without any problem, being discharged without complications. On the postoperative day 12, a cystogram demonstrated no extravasation, and the Foley catheter was removed. After 1 month, renal scan showed the left kidney with 60.1% and the right kidney with 39.9% of total renal function. At 2 years follow-up, his serum creatinine was 1.14 and estimated glomerular filtration rate was 70 mL/min/1.73 m(2)., Conclusion: Robot-assisted laparaoscopic ileal ureter with a completely intracorporeal technique is feasible and appears to be safe. A larger number of procedures using this technique and longer follow-up are needed to further define its role in the treatment of ureteral strictures., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To report on a large multi-institutional series of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) partial nephrectomy (PN) and analyse renal function and short-term oncological outcomes., Material and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive cases of LESS-PN performed between November 2007 and March 2012 at 11 participating institutions. Demographic data and data on the main peri-operative outcomes and complications were gathered and analysed. Kidney function was evaluated by measuring serum creatinine concentration and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Chronic kidney disease was defined in stages for each patient according to the National Kidney Foundation, Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative., Results: A total of 190 cases were included in this analysis. The mean renal tumour size was 2.6 cm, and the mean PADUA score was 7.2. The median operating time was 170 min with a median estimated blood loss of 150 mL. A clampless technique was used in 70 cases (36.8%) and the median warm ischaemia time (WIT) was 16.5 min. PADUA score independently predicted the length of WIT (low vs high score: odds ratio 5.11, CI 1.50-17.41, P = 0.009; intermediate vs high score: odds ratio 5.13, CI 1.56-16.88, P = 0.007). The overall postoperative complication rate was 14.7%. Where a clamping technique was used, a significant increase in serum creatinine concentration and a significant decrease in eGFR were observed postoperatively and at 6 months. On multivariate analysis PADUA score was the only predicting factor. Overall survival rates were 99, 97 and 88% at 12-, 24- and 36-month follow-up, respectively, while disease-free survival rates were 98% at 12-month and 97% at 24- and 36-month follow-up., Conclusion: The study showed that LESS-PN is effective in terms of renal function preservation and oncological control at short- and intermediate-term follow-up., (© 2013 The Authors. BJU International © 2013 BJU International.)

Background: Extended oncologic outcomes after minimally invasive cystectomy have not been previously reported., Objective: To report outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) for bladder cancer (BCa) at up to 12-yr follow-up., Design, Setting, and Participants: All 121 patients undergoing RARC or LRC for BCa between December 1999 and September 2008 at a tertiary referral center were retrospectively evaluated from a prospectively maintained database., Intervention: RARC or LRC., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Primary end points were overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Secondary end points were survival analysis by number of lymph nodes (LNs) and type of procedure. Surgical outcomes, including complications, were analyzed., Results and Limitations: Most tumors were muscle invasive (≥ pT2; n=81; 67%) urothelial carcinomas (n=102; 84%). Extended LN dissection was performed in 98 patients (81%), with a median of 14 nodes removed (interquartile range [IQR]: 8-18). Twenty-four patients (20%) had node-positive disease (N1: 10 [8%]; N2: 14 [12%]). Eight patients (6.6%) had positive soft tissue margins. Median follow-up was 5.5 yr (mean: 5.9; IQR: 4.2-8.2; range: 0.13-12.1). At last follow-up, 58 patients (48%) had no evidence of disease, 3 (2%) were alive with recurrence, 59 (49%) had died, and status was unknown in 1. Twenty-eight patients (23%) died from cancer-specific causes, 20 (17%) from unrelated causes, and 11 (9%) from unknown causes. The 10-yr actuarial OS, CSS, and RFS rates were 35%, 63%, and 54%, respectively. At last follow-up, OS for pT0, pTis/a, pT1, pT2, and pT3 versus pT4 was 67%, 73%, 53%, 50%, and 16% versus 0%, respectively (p=0.02). At last follow-up, CSS for pT0, pTis/a, pT1, pT2, and pT3 versus pT4 was 100%, 91%, 74%, 77%, and 56% versus 0%, respectively (p=0.03)., Conclusions: The longest oncologic outcomes following RARC and LRC for BCa reported demonstrates results similar to those reported for open RC. Continued analysis and direct randomized comparison between techniques is necessary., (Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Purpose: The RENAL nephrometry score (RNS) was developed to quantify complexity of renal tumors in a reproducible manner. We aim to determine whether individual categories of the RNS have different impact on the warm ischemia time (WIT) for patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN)., Methods: In a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database, we identified 251 consecutive patients who underwent RPN between January 2007 and June 2010. RNS was determined in 187 with available imaging. Univariable analysis and multivariable linear regression analysis were performed to identify which factors were more significantly associated with WIT., Results: Overall RNS was of low (4-6), moderate (7-9), and high complexity (10-12) in 84 (45 %), 80 (43 %), and 23 (12 %) patients, respectively. There was no association between gender (p = 0.6), BMI (p = 0.3), or anterior/posterior location (A) (p = 0.8), and WIT. On univariable analysis, longer WIT was associated with size (R) >4 cm (p < 0.0001), entirely endophytic properties (E) (p = 0.005), tumor <4 mm from the collecting system/sinus (N) (p < 0.0001), and location between the polar lines (L) (p = 0.004). Total RNS and WIT were highly correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.54, p < 0.0001). There was a significant trend of higher WIT with increased tumor complexity (p for trend <0.0001). After multivariable analysis, only R (p = 0.0003), E (p = 0.003), and N (p = 0.00002) components of the RNS were significantly associated with WIT., Conclusions: The A and L subcategories of the RNS have no significant impact on the WIT of patients undergoing RPN. WIT is significantly dependent upon the other subcategories, as well as the overall RNS. These findings can be used to preoperatively predict which tumor characteristics will likely affect WIT and may be useful in preoperative counseling as well as planning of approach.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether preserved kidney volume predicts donor renal function at 1-year post-surgery. Data of patients who underwent laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy between October 2006 and September 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent computed tomography scan with an estimation of kidney volume by using an automated segmentation algorithm. We also calculated kidney volume adjusted for donor body surface area and donor preserved kidney volume ratio (split volume). Estimated glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. Predictors of the estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year were assessed by multiple linear regression. The 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate was available in 140 patients. The median age was 40 years, and median adjusted preserved kidney volume was 160.5 cc/1.73 m(2) (interquartile range 143.7-177.9). Median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 92.4 (interquartile range 81.9-101.2) and 61.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (interquartile range 53.4-68.7), respectively, at baseline and at 1 year. Preserved kidney volume adjusted to body surface area (P = 0.02) with age (P = 0.002) and preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (P < 0.001) were independent predictors of estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year. However, split kidney volume was not statistically related to estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year (P = 0.47). In order to maximize preservation of donor renal function, the pre-donation kidney volume adjusted to body surface area might be a useful parameter to consider when deciding on living kidney donation., (© 2013 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Background: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) has been developed in an attempt to further reduce the surgical trauma associated with conventional laparoscopy. Partial nephrectomy (PN) represents a challenging indication for LESS., Objective: To report a large multi-institutional series of LESS-PN and to analyze the predictors of outcomes after LESS-PN., Design, Setting, and Participants: Consecutive cases of LESS-PN done between November 2007 and March 2012 at 11 participating institutions were included in this retrospective analysis., Intervention: Each group performed LESS-PN according to its own protocols, entry criteria, and techniques., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Demographic data, main perioperative outcome parameters, and perioperative complications were gathered and analyzed. A multivariable analysis was used to assess the factors predicting a short (≤ 20 min) warm ischemia time (WIT), the occurrence of postoperative complication of any grade, and a favorable outcome, arbitrarily defined as a combination of the following events: short WIT plus no perioperative complications plus negative surgical margins plus no conversion to open surgery or standard laparoscopy., Results and Limitations: A total of 190 cases were included in this analysis. Mean renal tumor size was 2.6, and PADUA score 7.2. Median operative time was 170 min, with median estimated blood loss (EBL) of 150 ml. A clampless technique was adopted in 70 cases (36.8%), and the median WIT was 16.5 min. PADUA score independently predicted length of WIT (low vs high score: odds ratio [OR]: 5.11 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.50-17.41]; p=0.009; intermediate vs high score: OR: 5.13 [95% CI, 1.56-16.88]; p=0.007). The overall postoperative complication rate was 14.7%. The adoption of a robotic LESS technique versus conventional LESS (OR: 20.92 [95% CI, 2.66-164.64]; p=0.003) and the occurrence of lower (≤ 250 ml) EBL (OR: 3.60 [95% CI, 1.35-9.56]; p=0.010) were found to be independent predictors of no postoperative complications of any grade. A favorable outcome was obtained in 83 cases (43.68%). On multivariate analysis, the only predictive factor of a favorable outcome was the PADUA score (low vs high score: OR: 4.99 [95% CI, 1.98-12.59]; p<0.001). Limitations of the study were the retrospective design and different selection criteria for the participating centers., Conclusions: LESS-PN can be safely and effectively performed by experienced hands, given a high likelihood of a single additional port. Anatomic tumor characteristics as determined by the PADUA score are independent predictors of a favorable surgical outcome. Thus patients presenting tumors with low PADUA scores represent the best candidates for LESS-PN. The application of a robotic platform is likely to reduce the overall risk of postoperative complications., (Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of probe ablative therapy as salvage treatment for renal tumor in von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) patients after previous partial nephrectomy (PN)., Methods: Medical records of VHL patients undergoing probe ablative treatment for renal tumors from March 2003 to January 2010 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed., Results: Fourteen VHL patients who were submitted to salvage probe ablative therapy were included in the analysis. Twelve patients (85%) had a solitary kidney. Overall, 33 tumors were ablated by either percutaneous cryoablation (P-Cryo) (n of procedures = 13), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (n = 14), and laparoscopic cryoablation (L-Cryo) (n = 3). Average maximal renal tumor diameter was 2.6 ± 1 cm. Average ablation time was 18.3 ± 2.1 minutes for P-Cryo, 36.7 ± 17 minutes for RFA, and 17.3 ± 4 minutes for L-Cryo. All procedures were successfully completed without transfusions and intraoperative complications. No early postoperative complications were recorded. Postoperative decline in renal function was minimal and not clinically significant. With a mean follow-up of 37.6 months (range 12-82), 4 patients had a suspicious recurrence on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) scan and in 3 of them a re-ablation was performed. Actuarial overall and cancer-specific survivals were 92% and 100%, respectively., Conclusions: Probe ablative therapy seems to represent a suitable treatment option for VHL patients with a previous history of PN as it offers a repeatable operation, with a high technical success rate and causing minor changes in renal function., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for hilar vs nonhilar tumors., Materials and Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed 364 patients with available computed tomography scans undergoing RAPN. Demographic data and perioperative outcomes results were compared between the hilar (group 1, n = 70) and nonhilar tumors (group 2, n = 294). Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors of warm ischemia time (WIT), estimated blood loss (EBL), major perioperative complications, and postoperative renal function., Results: There were no differences with respect to demographic variables. Hilar tumors had higher RENAL (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties of the tumor, nearness of tumor deepest portion to the collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior descriptor and the location relative to polar lines) scores (P <.001) and were larger (3.9 vs 2.6 cm, P <.001). Surgeries for hilar tumors were associated with greater operative time (210 vs 180 minutes, P <.001), longer WIT (27 vs 17 minutes, P <.001), and increased EBL (250 vs 200 mL, P = .04). No differences were noted in transfusion rate, length of stay, complications (overall and major) and positive margins. Postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate showed no significant difference between hilar vs nonhilar patients on postoperative day 3 (70.12 vs 74.71 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P = .31) or at last follow-up (72.62 vs 75.78 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P = .40), respectively. Multivariate analysis found hilar location was independently associated with increased WIT without significant changes in EBL, major complications, or postoperative renal function., Conclusion: RAPN represents a safe and effective procedure for hilar tumors. Hilar location for patients undergoing RAPN in a high-volume institution seems not be associated with an increased risk of transfusions, major complications, or decline of early postoperative renal function., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and clinically aggressive cancer. Previous studies reported increased recurrence rates associated with laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). We evaluated a single-center experience of LA versus open adrenalectomy (OA) for the management of ACC., Methods: Between 1993 and 2011, 44 consecutive patients with primary ACC were treated at our institution. Baseline patient characteristics and surgical and pathological outcomes were compared between OA and LA groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to estimate the association between OA versus LA with recurrence-free and overall survival., Results: Eighteen and 26 patients underwent LA and OA, respectively. Patients who underwent OA had larger tumors and more advanced clinical stage compared with LA group. During a median follow-up of 22 months, 22 recurrences and 26 deaths were observed. The 2-year, recurrence-free and overall survivals for OA and LA were 60 vs. 39 % (P = 0.7) and 54 vs. 58 % (P = 0.6), respectively. After adjusting for clinical stage, OA was associated with lower risk of recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 0.4; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.2-1.2; P = 0.099) and improved overall survival (HR 0.5; 95 % CI 0.2-1.2; P = 0.122) compared with LA, although differences were not statistically significant., Conclusions: A nonstatistically significant increase in recurrence and death was observed among patients undergoing LA versus OA after adjusting for clinical stage. The rarity of this disease limits the ability to assess for significant differences in a single-institution series. Patients with suspected ACC should be considered for OA.

Objective: To assess the feasibility of robotic transrectal hybrid natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) nephrectomy and adrenalectomy., Materials and Methods: A male cadaver was used for the present investigation and placed in lithotomy position. An 8- and 12-mm port was inserted through the same periumbilical skin incision. An incision was then created in the rectum 1 cm above the pectinate line, and a submucosal tunnel was developed, through which a robotic 8-mm port was inserted under vision. The cadaver was then placed in the right side up, flank position. The laparoscope and the right robot instrument were introduced through the umbilicus while the left robot instrument was introduced through the rectal port aiding the peri-umbilical ports in kidney and adrenal dissection. After completion of the nephrectomy, the kidney was placed in a specimen bag and extracted intact through the rectum. Closure of the rectal incision was accomplished extracorporeally using 2 suture layers., Results: Robotic transrectal hybrid NOTES nephrectomy and adrenalectomy were completed successfully. The total operative time was 145 minutes, of which the access and robotic docking required 20 minutes. Kidney dissection and hilar control was achieved within 60 minutes. Right adrenalectomy, specimen extraction, and rectal closure was completed in 15, 30, and 20 minutes, respectively., Conclusion: We report the first investigation of a robot-assisted transrectal hybrid NOTES nephrectomy and adrenalectomy in a cadaver model to assess the range of motion and articulation of the robotic platform. Additional investigations in live animal model are needed to evaluate the safety of the transrectal approach., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility, and to report our single-centre perioperative outcomes of repeat robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN)., Patients and Methods: From June 2006 to June 2012, 490 patients underwent RAPN for a renal mass at our centre. Of these patients, nine who had undergone previous ipsilateral nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) were included in the analysis. Patient charts were reviewed to obtain demographic data, preoperative surgical history, operative details, and postoperative outcomes and follow-up data., Results: In all, 12 tumours were removed in nine patients (median age 69 years; six female). A third of the operations were performed on patients with a solitary kidney. The median (range) R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score for the resected masses was 7 (4-8). The warm ischaemia time was 17.5 min and in three of the nine patients an unclamped procedure was performed. No intraoperative complications were registered, whereas only two minor complications occurred postoperatively. There were no renal unit losses. All surgical margins were negative. There was no significant difference between mean preoperative and latest postoperative mean estimated glomerular filtration rates (70.5 vs 63.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , P > 0.05). At a mean (sd) follow-up of 8.3 (13) months, eight of the nine patients with a pathology diagnosis of malignant neoplasm were alive and free from disease at the latest follow-up., Conclusion: Although technically more demanding, repeat RAPN can be safely and effectively performed in patients presenting with local recurrence after primary NSS for kidney cancer., (© 2013 BJU International.)

Objectives: To compare the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor in patients with a solitary kidney., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of patients with solitary kidney who underwent laparoscopic (n = 52) and robot-assisted (n = 15) partial nephrectomy for renal tumor at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, between June 2000 and April 2012. Patient demographic data, perioperative parameters and follow-up data were compared., Results: The two groups were similar in terms of patients and tumor characteristics, including preoperative renal function and etiology of solitary kidney. The median operative time (225 vs 171 min, P = 0.02), warm ischemia time (19 vs 15 min, P = 0.04) and hospital stay (4 vs 3 days, P = 0.03) were significantly shorter in the robotic group. No significant differences were found in terms of estimated blood loss, transfusion, complications, pathological results and margin status. The median percentage change of renal function was not significantly different between two groups. Long-term hemodialysis was required for three patients in the laparoscopic group (6%) and none of the patients in the robotic group. Median follow up was 15.6 and 5.9 months in the laparoscopic and robotic group, respectively., Conclusions: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy represents a safe and effective minimally-invasive treatment option for renal masses in patients with a solitary kidney. Early comparative outcomes suggest that it offers a significant benefit over the laparoscopic approach in terms of operative time, warm ischemia time and hospital stay. Further studies with a longer follow up are required to confirm the likelihood of better long-term functional and oncological outcomes., (© 2012 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Introduction: The aim of this study is to assess perioperative outcomes in a large series of robotic partial nephrectomy., Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 413 patients undergoing a robotic partial nephrectomy in a single center between June 2006 and December 2011. We analyzed demographic characteristics, operative and postoperative outcomes., Results: Mean age was 58.6±11.9 years, body mass index was 30.5±7.1 kg/m2 and median ASA score 3. Mean tumor size was 3.2±1.66 cm and was divided in low, moderate and high RENAL nephrometry score respectively in 40%, 44% and 16%. Operative time and warm ischemia time were respectively 191 and 21min. Mean estimated blood loss was 200 mL and there were 4.3% major complications (Clavien-Dindo System). Mean length of stay was 3.6 days. The latest estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 74.84 mL/min×1.73 m2 with a mean decrease of 8.6%. In multivariate analysis, Charlson comorbidity index (P=0.005), preoperative eGFR (P<0.001) and warm ischemia time (P=0.0025) were found to be independent predictors of latest postoperative renal function., Conclusion: Robotic partial nephrectomy is feasible and safe in experienced hands. In our study preoperative renal function, Charlson comorbidity index and warm ischemia time were independent predictors of latest eGFR., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Ureteroneocystostomy can be used for the treatment of patients with a wide variety of ureteral pathology. Over the last decade, robot-assisted surgery has become more commonly used as a minimally invasive approach for reconstructive upper urinary tract procedures. The aim of this study is to present our experience with robot-assisted ureteroneocystosctomy (RUNC) with a comparison with that of open ureteroneocystostomy (OUNC)., Patients and Methods: Medical records of 25 patients who underwent RUNC and 41 patients who underwent OUNC or at our institution between 2000 and 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative and postoperative data including demographics, surgical outcomes, and clinical and radiographic findings at postoperative follow-up were considered in the comparative analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data. The significance of the difference between variables was evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous and Fisher exact test for categorical variables., Results: No significant differences were detected in terms of baseline patient characteristics between the two groups. The OUNC procedures were performed with a shorter median operative time (200 vs 279 min., P=0.0008), whereas RUNC patients had a shorter hospital stay (median 3 vs 5 days, P=0.0004), less narcotic pain requirement (morphine equivalent, mg 104.6 vs 290, P=0.0001), and less estimated blood loss (100 vs 150 mL, P=<0.0002). There as no significant difference in the rate of reoperation between groups: RUNC 2/25 (7.6 %) vs OUNC 4/41 (9.7%) P=0.8. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and the difference in indications for surgery., Conclusion: RUNC provides excellent outcomes with shorter hospital stay, less narcotic pain requirement, and decreased blood loss when compared with the open procedure. Advantages of the robotic platform for dissection and suturing can be useful for complex minimally invasive urologic reconstructive procedures.

Background and Purpose: Intraoperative frozen section (FS) analysis has been regarded as a paramount tool for immediate evaluation of tumor margin status during partial nephrectomy procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of FS during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN)., Patients and Methods: A retrospective review of our Institutional Review Board-approved prospectively maintained minimally invasive partial nephrectomy database yielded 342 consecutive RAPN procedures from June 2007 to September 2011. Of these, the initial 128 cases underwent FS evaluation, whereas the following 214 cases did not. Patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, and final pathology results were analyzed and compared between the two groups., Results: Body mass index, Charleson Comorbidity Index, tumor size, renal score, preoperative creatinine level, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were similar between both groups. Operative time was significantly longer in the no-FS group (193 vs 180 min; P=0.04). Warm ischemia time (median 19 vs 19 min), estimated blood loss (150 vs 200 mL), postoperative creatinine level (1.0 vs 1.1 mg/dL), and postoperative eGFR (75.6 vs 75.9) were similar between the no-FS group and FS group, respectively. Complications occurred in 32 (15.0%) and 31 (24.2%) cases in no-FS and FS, respectively (P=0.06). Final pathology results demonstrated seven cases of positive margins, 1 (1%), in the FS group and 6 (3%) in the no-FS group (P=0.19). Of the cases with positive margins at final pathology analysis, a R.E.N.A.L. score of 3/3 was found on closeness to renal sinus. Overall, three intraoperative positive margins were noted in the FS group (2.3%): One patient underwent radical nephrectomy and one reresection; one case was managed with observation only., Conclusion: Routine application of FS analysis during RAPN seems to provide a limited benefit. FS might be advisable for tumors with sinus invasion because they seem to carry a higher likelihood of positive surgical margin at final pathology determination.

Purpose: We evaluated the change in renal function after renal cryoablation and partial nephrectomy based on tumor complexity according to the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who had a renal tumor in a solitary kidney, and underwent renal cryoablation and partial nephrectomy between December 2000 and January 2012. Renal tumor complexity was categorized into 3 groups by R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score as low (4 to 6), intermediate (7 to 9) and high (10 to 12). All baseline demographic data, perioperative parameters and followup data including renal function were collected. Comparisons were made among similar tumor complexities., Results: In the renal cryoablation and partial nephrectomy groups 29 patients (43 tumors) and 33 patients were identified, respectively. In all renal tumor complexities, renal cryoablation provided a better perioperative outcome in terms of median operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion, hospital stay and complications. The median change in serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate was slightly greater in the partial nephrectomy group. However, the differences were not statistically significant for any of the tumor complexities. Three patients (10%) in the renal cryoablation group and 2 (6%) in the partial nephrectomy group required long-term dialysis., Conclusions: In patients with solitary kidneys, renal cryoablation is associated with superior perioperative outcomes compared to partial nephrectomy. Specifically, partial nephrectomy is not associated with greater loss of renal function than renal cryoablation regardless of the extent of tumor complexity., (Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the detection of near-infrared fluorescence from prostate tumors stained with a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted tracer developed in our institution with a novel robotic imaging system., Methods: Prostate cancer cell lines PC3-pip (PSMA positive) and PC3-flu (PSMA negative) were implanted subcutaneously into 6 immunodeficient mice. When tumors reached 5 mm, a PSMA-targeted fluorescent conjugate was injected intravenously. The first 3 mice underwent near-infrared imaging immediately and hourly up to 4 hours after injection to determine the time necessary to obtain peak fluorescence and were killed. The last 3 mice were imaged once preoperatively and were euthanized 120 minutes later. Excision of the tumors was performed by using a novel robotic imaging system to detect near-infrared fluorescence in real time. Specimens were submitted for pathology., Results: In the first 3 mice, we found 120 minutes as the time needed to observe peak fluorescence from the PSMA-positive tumors. We identified discrete near-infrared fluorescence from 2 of 3 PSMA-positive tumors with the robotic imaging system. Surgical margins were negative for all excised specimens except for one PSMA-negative tumor., Conclusions: Real-time near-infrared fluorescence imaging of prostate cancer is feasible with a novel robotic imaging system. Further research is needed to optimize the signal intensity detectable from prostate cancer with our tracer. Toxicologic studies are needed before its clinical use., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Robot-assisted laparoscopic bladder diverticulectomy (RALBD) has been increasingly reported in recent years. We review the technique of RALBD and the perioperative outcomes. We searched online databases to identify original articles related to RALBD. In the Method section, we describe our technique and reviewe several techniques for identification and robotic management of bladder diverticula. We identified 13 retrospective studies that met our criteria, with a total of 44 patients. The mean diverticulum size was 8.3 ± 3.6 cm, mean operative time was 186 ± 68 min, mean estimated blood loss was 86 ± 64 ml, and mean length of stay was 2.4 ± 1.7 days. In the majority of cases, patients with acquired diverticula underwent urethral catheter removal between 7 and 14 postoperative days while in the pediatric population with congenital bladder diverticula, Foley catheter removal usually occurred on postoperative day one. We conclude that a robotic technique is a feasible minimally invasive approach for bladder diverticulectomy. Potential benefits may include precise dissection of adjacent structures, as well as easier intracorporeal suturing. Further studies are needed to compare outcomes and costs versus other existing procedures.

Context: Centres worldwide have been performing partial nephrectomies laparoscopically for greater than a decade. With the increasing use of robotics, many centres have reported their early experiences using it for nephron-sparing surgery., Objective: To review published literature comparing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN)., Evidence Acquisition: An online systematic review of the literature according to Cochrane guidelines was conducted from 2000 to 2012 including studies comparing RPN and LPN. All studies comparing RPN with LPN were included. The outcome measures were the patient demographics, tumour size, operating time, warm ischaemic time, blood loss, transfusion rates, length of hospital stay, conversion rates, and complications. A meta-analysis of the results was conducted. For continuous data, a Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test was used; for dichotomous data, an inverse variance was used. Each was expressed as a risk ratio with a 95% confidence interval p<0.05 considered significant., Evidence Synthesis: A total of 717 patients were included, 313 patients in the robotic group and 404 patients in the laparoscopic group (seven studies). There was no significant difference between the two groups in any of the demographic parameters except for age (age: p=0.006; sex: p=0.54; laterality: p=0.05; tumour size: p=0.62, tumour location: p=57; or confirmed malignant final pathology: p=0.79). There was no difference between the two groups regarding operative times (p=0.58), estimated blood loss (p=0.76), or conversion rates (p=0.84). The RPN group had significantly less warm ischaemic time than the LPN group (p=0.0008). There was no difference regarding postoperative length of hospital stay (p=0.37), complications (p=0.86), or positive margins (p=0.93)., Conclusions: In early experience, RPN appears to be a feasible and safe alternative to its laparoscopic counterpart with decreased warm ischaemia times noted., (Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The literature yielded only four studies on the subject; however, no clear outcome can be taken from individual studies. This review adds a meta-analysis of these four studies to make the patient cohort larger and to allow for a greater understanding of the procedure in this select group of patients. • To compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in obese and non-obese patients. • We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2011), EMBASE (1980 to November 2011), CINAHL, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, reference lists of articles and abstracts from conference proceedings without language restriction for studies comparing LPN in obese and non-obese patients. • Four observational cohort studies were included for 256 obese patients compared with 403 non-obese patients who underwent LPN. • There was no difference in operative duration (mean difference [MD] 5.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]-3.80 to 15.09), warm ischaemic time (MD -1.04, 95% CI -2.68 to 0.59), estimated blood loss (MD 53.73, 95% CI 0.72-106.74) or hospital stay (MD -0.04, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.22). • There was no difference in complications in total (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.70-1.49), intraoperative complications (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.30-1.53), or postoperative complications (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.75-1.77). • The obese group had significantly more Clavien grade III complications (OR 3.95, 95% CI 1.36-11.42), despite the low absolute incidence, with 4.3% (11/256) in the obese group vs 1.5% (6/403) in the non-obese group. • Experienced laparoscopic surgeons can safely and efficiently perform PN for obese patients with comparable results to those of non-obese patients. • The likelihood of major (Clavien Classification ≥ III) complications is higher for the obese patient., (© 2012 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL.)

Unlabelled: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Single port transvesical enucleation of the prostate (STEP) performed through a solitary suprapubic incision using a single access port inserted directly into the bladder has been demonstrated to be technically feasible but still challenging.3. Despite being feasible and providing adequate relief of bladder outlet obstruction, robotic STEP carries a high risk of complications. Further evolution of the technique is likely to be strictly dependent on the development of instrumentation., Objective: To report our initial experience with a novel robot assisted single port procedure for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)., Methods: Between March 2009 and July 2010, nine patients with symptomatic BPH were scheduled for robotic single port suprapubic transvesical enucleation of the prostate (R-STEP). Prior to intervention, all were submitted to preoperative transrectal ultrasound of the prostate and uroflowmetry. The surgical procedure included an initial transurethral incision of the prostatic apex. With the patient in the supine position, an approximate 3 cm lower midline incision was made. A cystotomy was created and a GelPort(®) laparoscopic system positioned in the bladder. The da Vinci S™ robotic operating system was docked through the GelPort(®) platform and enucleation was performed. Perioperative outcomes and short-term postoperative functional outcomes were assessed. Intra-operative and postoperative complications, graded according to the Dindo-Clavien system, were recorded., Results: One patient was excluded from the analysis as the procedure was aborted and converted to open simple prostatectomy. Median operative time was 3.9 h. Median visual analogue pain scale on discharge was 2. Estimated blood loss was 425 mL. Two patients required intra-operative blood transfusion. Postoperatively, two patients developed clot retention and required evacuation and fulguration (grade IIIb), one of them had a deep vein thrombosis (grade II) and a urinary tract infection (grade II). One patient was admitted to the intensive care unit after a myocardial infarction (grade IVa). All patients were discharged after a median of 4.5 days. There was almost three and four times postoperative improvement in both median maximum flow (Qmax) and average flow (Qave) rates, respectively., Conclusion: The first series of R-STEP is reported herein. Despite being feasible and providing adequate relief of bladder outlet obstruction, the procedure carries a high risk of complications. Further evolution of the technique is likely to be strictly dependent on the development of instrumentation. Thus, its role in the surgical armamentarium of BPH remains to be determined., (© 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL.)

Objective: To describe a novel robotic transrectal ultrasound platform for real-time navigation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) and to report its early clinical application., Methods: Five men undergoing RALPs at our Institution agreed to participate in this Institutional Review Board-approved pilot study. All of them were eligible for a bilateral nerve sparing procedure. Before docking the da Vinci robot, a transrectal ultrasound tri-plane side-fire probe was placed. A modified ViKY Endoscope Holder was used during RALPs to move the probe thanks to a remote control placed under the console surgeon's control during RALPs. During each procedure, attempt was made to estimate prostate volume, define 12 reference points, and to precisely identify location of the neurovascular bundles using Doppler ultrasound. The TilePro was used during the procedures to allow real-time ultrasound imaging to guide robotic instruments during dissection., Results: Median robotic transrectal ultrasound probe holder (R-TRUS) setup time was 11 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 10-14). Prostate volume calculation, reference point definition, neurovascular bundle identification, and instrument tip visualization were successful in all men. In 1 patient with a large prostate (120 mL), R-TRUS was withdrawn during recto-prostatic dissection. There were no rectal injuries., Conclusion: R-TRUS during RALPs is feasible and safe. It allows real-time TRUS navigation and guidance. Further studies are needed to evaluate its impact on oncological and functional outcomes., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We analyzed the incidence of and risk factors for complications and conversions in a large contemporary series of patients treated with urological laparoendoscopic single site surgery., Materials and Methods: The study cohort consisted of consecutive patients treated with laparoendoscopic single site surgery between August 2007 and December 2010 at a total of 21 institutions. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the risks of conversion, and of any grade and only high grade postoperative complications., Results: Included in analysis were 1,163 cases. Intraoperatively complications occurred in 3.3% of cases. The overall conversion rate was 19.6% with 14.6%, 4% and 1.1% of procedures converted to reduced port laparoscopy, conventional laparoscopic/robotic surgery and open surgery, respectively. On multivariable analysis the factors significantly associated with the risk of conversion were oncological surgical indication (p=0.02), pelvic surgery (p<0.001), robotic approach (p<0.001), high difficulty score (p=0.004), extended operative time (p=0.03) and an intraoperative complication (p=0.001). A total of 120 postoperative complications occurred in 109 patients (9.4%) with major complications in only 2.4% of the entire cohort. Reconstructive procedure (p=0.03), high difficulty score (p=0.002) and extended operative time (p=0.02) predicted high grade complications., Conclusions: Urological laparoendoscopic single site surgery can be done with a low complication rate, resembling that in laparoscopic series. The conversion rate suggests that early adopters of the technique have adhered to the principles of careful patient selection and safety. Besides facilitating future comparisons across institutions, this analysis can be useful to counsel patients on the current risks of urological laparoendoscopic single site surgery., (Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) has emerged as a viable approach to minimally invasive surgery for small renal tumors. There are few reports of RPN for tumors >4 cm. Our objective was to evaluate outcomes of RPN for tumors >4 cm compared with RPN for tumors ≤ 4 cm in a large multi-institutional study., Patients and Methods: We reviewed data for 445 consecutive patients who underwent RPN by experienced surgeons at four academic institutions from 2006 to 2010. Patients were stratified into two groups according to radiographic tumor size. Patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, and oncologic outcomes were recorded., Results: A total of 83 of 445 (18.7%) patients had tumors >4 cm with a median radiographic tumor size of 5.0 cm (4.1-11 cm). Patients with tumors >4 cm had a higher proportion of hilar tumors (9.8% vs 4.7%, P<0.001), a higher mean R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (8.0 vs 6.3, P<0.01), longer warm ischemia time (WIT) (24 vs 17 min, P<0.001), and an increased rate of collecting system repair (72.2% vs 51.6%, P=0.006) compared with patients with tumors ≤ 4 cm. Functional outcomes and complications were similar between groups. There were no positive margins in patients with tumors >4 cm and only one recurrence., Conclusions: In the largest multi-institutional series of RPN for tumors >4 cm, we demonstrate safety, feasibility, and efficacy of RPN for tumors >4 cm. Patients with tumors >4 cm had a higher nephrometry score, longer WIT, and slightly higher estimated blood loss compared with patients who had tumors ≤ 4 cm, but there was no increased risk of adverse outcomes in the hands of experienced surgeons.

Background: Open partial nephrectomy (OPN) remains the gold standard for treatment of small renal masses (SRMs). Laparoscopic cryoablation (LCA) has provided encouraging outcomes. Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) represents a new promising option but is still under evaluation., Objective: Compare the outcomes of RPN and LCA in the treatment of patients with SRMs., Design, Setting, and Participants: We retrospectively analyzed the medical charts of patients with SRMs (≤4cm) who underwent minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery (RPN or LCA) in our institution from January 1998 to December 2010., Intervention: RPN and LCA., Measurements: Perioperative complications and functional and oncologic outcomes were analyzed., Results and Limitations: A total of 446 SRMs were identified in 436 patients (RPN, n=210; LCA, n=226). Patients undergoing RPN were younger (p<0.0001), had a lower American Society of Anesthesiologists score (p<0.001), and higher baseline preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (p<0.0001). Mean tumor size was smaller in the LCA group (2.2 vs 2.4cm; p=0.004). RPN was associated with longer operative time (180 vs 165min; p=0.01), increased estimated blood loss (200 vs 75ml; p<0.0001), longer hospital stay (72 vs 48h; p<0.0001), and higher morbidity rate (20% vs 12%, p=0.015). Mean follow-ups for RPN and LCA were 4.8 mo and 44.5 mo, respectively (p<0.0001). Local recurrence rates for RPN and LCA were 0% and 11%, respectively (p<0.0001). Mean eGFR decrease after RPN and LCA was insignificant at 1 mo, at 6 mo after surgery, and during last follow-up. Limitations include retrospective study design, length of follow-up, and selection bias., Conclusions: Both techniques remain viable treatment options in the management of SRMs. A higher incidence of perioperative complications was found in patients undergoing RPN. However, the technique was not predictive of the occurrence of postoperative complications. Early oncologic outcomes are promising for RPN, which also seems to be associated with better preservation of renal function. Long-term follow-up and well-designed prospective comparative studies are awaited to corroborate these findings., (Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To summarize the available tools available for performing LaparoEndoscopic Single-Site surgery in Urology., Method: A comprehensive electronic literature search was conducted in May 2011 using the Medline database to identify all publications relating to NOTES and LESS in urology and information on devices were also obtained by accessing company Websites., Results: Multiple access ports are available and allow to insert several instruments through multiple channels inside a larger single port. Due to lack of triangulation intracorporally, companies developed various articulating and bent instruments, limiting clashing and allowing increased working space. The ideal endoscope for LESS should remove the light cord and camera head from the operative field. Articulating and low profile scopes are now available. Furthermore, surgeons can use extra-long scopes., Conclusion: Various tools currently are available for single-site surgery. Randomized studies are needed to determine the Platform selection.

This case study describes our initial laboratory experience using the SPIDER surgical system (TransEnterix, Morrisville, NC, USA) for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) urologic procedures and reports its first clinical application. The SPIDER system was tested in a laboratory setting and used for a clinical case of renal cyst decortication. Three tasks were performed during the dry lab session, and different urologic procedures were conducted in a porcine model. The time to complete the tasks and penalties were registered during the dry lab session. Perioperative outcomes and subjective assessment by the surgeons were registered. The surgeons had a positive experience with the SPIDER system, with a mean overall score of 3.6 (on a scale of 1-5). The surgeons were able to gain proficiency in performing tasks regardless of their level of expertise. The highest scores recorded were for ease of device insertion, instrument insertion and exchange, and triangulation. The lowest scores were for retraction. During the clinical case, the platform provided good triangulation without instrument clashing. However, retraction was challenging because of the lack of strength and precise maneuverability with the tip of the instruments fully deployed. The SPIDER system offers intuitive instrument maneuverability and restored triangulation without external instrument clashing. Further refinements are awaited to define its role in the urologic LESS armamentarium., (Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We compare perioperative, functional and intermediate-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) vs laparoscopic cryoablation (LCA) for small renal tumour in patients with a solitary kidney. A treatment algorithm is also proposed., Patient and Methods: Over a 10-year period (02/1998-09/2008), 78 patients with a small tumour in a functionally solitary kidney underwent LPN (n = 48) or LCA (n = 30). Baseline, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively., Results: Demographic data were similar between the LPN and LCA groups. Tumours were somewhat larger (3.2 vs 2.6 cm) in the LPN group. LPN was associated with greater blood loss (391 vs 162 mL; P = 0.003), and trended towards more post-operative complications (22.9% vs 6.7%; P = 0.07). By 3 months post-operative, eGFR decreased by 14.5% and 7.3% after LPN and LCA, respectively (P = 0.02). Post-operative temporary dialysis was required after 3 LPN (6.2% vs 0%, P = 0.16). Median follow-up time for LPN and LCA was 42.7 and 60.2 months, respectively. Local recurrence was detected in 4 (13.3%) LCA patients only (P = 0.02). Overall survival was comparable between LPN and LCA at 3 and 5 years, respectively (P = 0.74). The LPN group had superior cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival at 3 and 5 years compared to the LCA group (P < 0.05, for all comparisons)., Conclusions: Given adequate technical expertise, both LPN and LCA are viable nephron-sparing options for patients with tumour in a solitary kidney. Although LCA is technically easier and has superior functional outcomes, oncologic outcomes are superior after LPN., (© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.)

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detection of suspicious anterior prostate lesions, and its role in staging and grading of anterior prostate cancer (APC)., Methods: Between January 2008 and August 2009, 243 patients had prostate cancer diagnosed at 12-cores posterior systematic biopsies and additional 2-cores transrectal ultrasound-guided, free-hand-targeted biopsy at any area suspicious for malignancy at prebiopsy multiparametric MRI. We conducted a retrospective study of 45 of 243 (19%) patients with an area suspicious for malignancy at MRI predominantly located in the anterior part of the gland, for which targeted biopsies were positive. Targeted vs systematic biopsy cancer detection rate and upgrading based on length of cancer in the most involved core and Gleason score were measured., Results: Of the 45 patients, 46 separate APCs were identified at MRI with positive targeted biopsies. APC was not detected by systematic biopsies in 21 (46%) cases and detected in 25 (54%) cases. For these 25 cases, median cancer length of the most involved core in targeted compared with systematic biopsies was 8 mm vs 1 mm (P <.001), respectively. Significant Gleason score upgrading was observed in 11 of 25 (44%) cases. Correlation coefficient between the cancer length on targeted biopsies and the antero-posterior diameter of the area suspicious for malignancy on MRI was r(2) = .6 (P <.001). Separate posterior cancer was diagnosed in 26 patients., Conclusions: Targeted biopsies based on a prebiopsy MRI-detected lesion improved detection rate, volume, and grade of APC compared with currently used 12-cores systematic biopsies., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) has gained popularity in urology over the last few years., Objective: To report a large multi-institutional worldwide series of LESS in urology., Design, Setting, and Participants: Consecutive cases of LESS done between August 2007 and November 2010 at 18 participating institutions were included in this retrospective analysis., Intervention: Each group performed a variety of LESS procedures according to its own protocols, entry criteria, and techniques., Measurements: Demographic data, main perioperative outcome parameters, and information related to the surgical technique were gathered and analyzed. Conversions to reduced-port laparoscopy, conventional laparoscopy, or open surgery were evaluated, as were intraoperative and postoperative complications., Results and Limitations: Overall, 1076 patients were included in the analysis. The most common procedures were extirpative or ablative operations in the upper urinary tract. The da Vinci robot was used to operate on 143 patients (13%). A single-port technique was most commonly used and the umbilicus represented the most common access site. Overall, operative time was 160±93 min and estimated blood loss was 148±234 ml. Skin incision length at closure was 3.5±1.5 cm. Mean hospital stay was 3.6±2.7 d with a visual analog pain score at discharge of 1.5±1.4. An additional port was used in 23% of cases. The overall conversion rate was 20.8%; 15.8% of patients were converted to reduced-port laparoscopy, 4% to conventional laparoscopy/robotic surgery, and 1% to open surgery. The intraoperative complication rate was 3.3%. Postoperative complications, mostly low grade, were encountered in 9.5% of cases., Conclusions: This study provides a global view of the evolution of LESS in the field of minimally invasive urologic surgery. A broad range of procedures have been effectively performed, primarily in the academic setting, within diverse health care systems around the world. Since LESS is performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons, the risk of complications remains low when stringent patient-selection criteria are applied., (Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare the intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) with those of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) outcomes in patients with bilateral synchronous renal tumors. RPN is emerging as an attractive minimally invasive nephron-sparing approach for renal tumors., Methods: Our ongoing institutional review board-approved, prospectively maintained, kidney cancer database was used to identify the study population. The medical records of patients who underwent minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery at our institution from January 2001 to March 2010 were used. A cohort of 9 patients undergoing bilateral RPN was identified and compared with 17 consecutive patients who underwent sequential bilateral LPN. The demographic, intraoperative, postoperative, and short-term renal functional data were retrospectively compared between the 2 groups., Results: A total of 18 procedures were performed in the RPN group and 32 in the LPN group. The median warm ischemia time was shorter in the RPN group than in the LPN group (19 vs 37 minutes, respectively; P = .059). The median tumor size was 2.85 and 2.7 cm in the RPN and LPN group, respectively (P = .03). The final median postoperative glomerular filtration rate was 68.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (interquartile range 14-73) and 26.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (interquartile range 20-70) in the RPN and LPN groups, respectively (P = .004). No difference was found in the complications in the RPN group (n = 2) compared with the LPN group (n = 4)., Conclusion: RPN is a safe and effective minimally invasive nephron-sparing treatment of bilateral synchronous kidney tumors. A trend was seen toward a shorter warm ischemia time and less effects on postoperative renal function compared with the laparoscopic approach., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: •To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies with extended systematic biopsies for the detection of significant prostate cancer., Methods: •In all, 555 consecutive patients with suspicion of prostate cancer had pre-biopsy dynamic contrast-enhanced 1.5-tesla (T) MRI with pelvic coil, 10-12 transrectal ultrasound-guided extended systematic biopsies plus two targeted biopsies at any MRI area suspicious for malignancy. •Significant prostate cancer was defined as >5 mm total cancer length and/or any Gleason pattern >3. •Cancer length and grade at biopsy were reported and located on a 24-sector map., Results: •Median (range) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 6.75 (0.18-100) ng/mL. •MRI was positive in 351 (63%) patients and, overall, 302 (54%) had cancer at extended systematic biopsies and/or targeted biopsies. Of 302 cancers detected, 249 (82%) were significant prostate cancers and 53 (18%) were nonsignificant prostate cancers. •Extended systematic biopsies did not detect 12 significant prostate cancers and targeted biopsies did not detect 13 significant prostate cancers. For significant prostate cancer detection, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of targeted biopsies were 0.95, 1.0 and 0.98. The values for extended systematic biopsies were 0.95, 0.83, and 0.88. •The detection accuracy of significant prostate cancer by targeted biopsies was higher than that by extended systematic biopsies (P < 0.001). Targeted biopsies also detected 16% more grade 4/5 cases and better quantified the cancer than extended systematic biopsies, with cancer length of 5.56 vs. 4.70 mm (P= 0.002). • A targeted biopsies-only strategy without extended systematic biopsies would have necessitated a mean of 3.8 cores performed in only 63% of patients with positive MRI and avoided the potentially unnecessary diagnosis of 13% (53/302) of nonsignificant prostate cancers., Conclusions: • Strategy of targeted biopsies alone at pre-biopsy MRI-suspicious areas is an attractive potential alternative to extended systematic biopsies for detection of significant prostate cancer. •Further studies are necessary to validate the strategy of targeted biopsies alone., (© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.)

Treatment options for a suspicious renal mass in a renal allograft include radical nephrectomy or nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). To our knowledge robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN) as treatment for a renal mass in a transplant kidney has not been previously reported. We report the case of RPN for a 7-cm renal mass in a transplanted kidney. A 35-year-old female with reflux nephropathy received a living-related donor kidney transplant in 1986. At 24 years after transplantation she had a 7-cm Bosniak III cystic mass of the allograft detected on computerized tomography (CT) scan. Preoperative creatinine was 2.2 mg/dL with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 25 mL/min/1.73 m(2) . RPN was performed with bulldog clamping of the renal vessels, the graft was left in situ and immunosuppression was maintained postoperatively. Tumor diameter was 7.3 cm with a nephrometry score of 10a. Warm ischemia time (WIT) was 26.5 min. Estimated blood loss was 100 mL. There was no change between pre- and postoperative eGFR. There were no operative complications. Histology was papillary renal cell carcinoma type 1, nuclear grade 2. Margins were negative. RPN is a technically feasible treatment option for a suspicious renal mass in renal allografts., (©2011 The Authors Journal compilation©2011 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Purpose: We evaluated the incidence of perioperative complications after robotic partial nephrectomy., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients treated with robotic assisted partial nephrectomy across the 4 participating institutions. Demographic, blood loss, warm ischemia time, and intraoperative and postoperative complication data were collected. All complications were graded according to the Clavien classification system., Results: A total of 450 consecutive robotic assisted partial nephrectomies were done between June 2006 and May 2009. Overall 71 patients (15.8%) had a complication, including intraoperative and postoperative complications in 8 (1.8%) and 65 (14.4%), respectively. Hemorrhage developed in 2 patients (0.2%) intraoperatively and in 22 (4.9%) postoperatively. Seven patients (1.6%) had urine leakage. As classified by the Clavien system, complications were grade I-II in 76.1% of cases and grade III-IV in 23.9%. Robotic assisted partial nephrectomy was converted to open or conventional laparoscopic surgery in 3 patients (0.7%) and to radical nephrectomy in 7 (1.6%). There were no deaths., Conclusions: Current data indicate that robotic assisted partial nephrectomy is safe. Most postoperative complications are Clavien grade I or II, or can be managed conservatively., (Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The object of this study was to evaluate the immediate impact of a robotic kidney surgery course on the practice patterns of participating urologists., Methods: Two surveys were administered to the participants of the International Symposium on Robotic Kidney and Adrenal Surgery held at the Cleveland Clinic on October 2009. Returned responses were entered into a database. Results were reviewed and analyzed., Results: Twenty-seven participants (60% of total registered) completed the end-of-course questionnaire. Mean age was 44 years (range 33-65). Mean time from completion of residency was 14 years (range 1-30). The majority of the attendees (78%) had familiarity with both laparoscopy and robotics, but only 22% of them had completed a formal fellowship or mini-residency training in laparoscopy or robotics. All course components received a mean score above 4.5. 92% of the participants planned to perform a 'new' procedure in their practice immediately after the course. Of the 27 participants contacted, 12 (44.4%) returned the 3-month questionnaire. All of them (100%) had performed robotic surgical procedures after the course. Overall, there was an increase of 56% in the robotic cases in the surgical practice of the participants. The actual impact of attending the course on starting or implementing robotic surgery practice was positively rated by the participants (mean score 4.7 ± 0.45 on scale 1-5)., Conclusions: A course including lectures, video analysis, live surgery and hands-on session with both simulators and an animal laboratory is an effective educational model for immediately spreading robotic skills.

Background: Recent reports have suggested that robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) is feasible, yet comparative studies to conventional laparoscopy are lacking., Objective: To report our early experience with R-LESS radical nephrectomy (RN)., Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective review of R-LESS RN data was performed between May 2008 and November 2010. A total of 10 procedures were performed and subsequently matched to 10 conventional laparoscopic RN procedures (controls). The control group was matched with respect to patient age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists score, surgical indication, and tumor size., Surgical Procedure: R-LESS RN was performed using methods outlined in the manuscript and supplemental video material. All patients underwent R-LESS RN by a single surgeon. Single-port access was achieved via two commercially available multichannel ports, and robotic trocars were inserted either through separate fascial stabs or through the port, depending on the type used. The da Vinci S and da Vinci-Si Surgical Systems (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with pediatric and standard instruments were used., Measurements: Preoperative, perioperative, pathologic, and functional outcomes data were analyzed., Results and Limitations: The mean patient age was 64.0 yr of age for both groups, and BMI was 29.2 kg/m(2). There was no difference between R-LESS and conventional laparoscopy cases in median operative time, estimated blood loss, visual analogue scale, or complication rate. The R-LESS group had a lower median narcotic requirement during hospital admission (25.3 morphine equivalents vs 37.5 morphine equivalents; p=0.049) and a shorter length of stay (2.5 d vs 3.0 d; p=0.03). Study limitations include the small sample size, short follow-up period, and all the inherent biases introduced by a retrospective study design., Conclusions: R-LESS RN offers comparable perioperative outcomes to conventional laparoscopic RN. Prospective comparison is needed to definitively establish the position of R-LESS in minimally invasive urologic surgery., (Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic partial nephrectomy for patients with complex renal masses., Methods: We reviewed the data for 164 consecutive patients who had undergone transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy at a tertiary care center from February 2007 to June 2010. Of the 112 patients who had available imaging studies to review, 67 were identified and classified as having a moderately or highly complex renal mass according to the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (≥7) (tumor size-[R]adius, location and depth-[E]xophytic or endophytic; nearness to the renal sinus fat or collecting system [N]; anterior or posterior position [A], and polar vs non-polar location [L]). The preoperative, perioperative, pathologic, and functional outcomes data were analyzed., Results: The median body mass index was 29.6 kg/m(2) (range 19.9-44.8). Of the 67 patients, 32 were men and 35 were women, with 32 right-sided masses and 35 left-sided masses. The median tumor size was 3.7 cm (range 1.2-11), and the median operative time was 180 minutes (range 150-180). The median estimated blood loss was 200 mL (range 100-375), and the warm ischemia time was 19.0 minutes (range 15-26). The median hospital stay was 3.0 days (range 3-4). The estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated at a median decrease of 11.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (range 9-1.3). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications, 2 grade 1, 12 grade 2, and 1 grade 3 complication occurred. All margins were pathologically negative, except for 1, and, after a mean follow-up of 10 months, no recurrences had developed., Conclusions: Robotic partial nephrectomy is a safe and feasible option for moderately or highly complex renal masses determined by the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. The warm ischemia time, blood loss, and complications were increased with highly complex masses., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and validity of a dedicated da Vinci single-port platform in the porcine model in the performance of gynecologic surgery., Methods: This pilot study was conducted in 4 female pigs. All pigs had a general anesthetic and were placed in the supine and flank position. A 2-cm umbilical incision was made, through which a robotic single-port device was placed and pneumoperitoneum obtained. A data set was collected for each procedure and included port placement time, docking time, operative time, blood loss, and complications. Operative times were compared between cases and procedures by use of the Student t test., Results: A total of 28 surgical procedures (8 oophorectomies, 4 hysterectomies, 8 pelvic lymph node dissections, 4 aorto-caval nodal dissections, 2 bladder repairs, 1 uterine horn anastomosis, and 1 radical cystectomy) were performed. There was no statistically significant difference in operating times for symmetrical procedures among animals (P=0.3215)., Conclusions: This animal study demonstrates that singleport robotic surgery using a dedicated single-site platform allows performing technically challenging procedures within acceptable operative times and without complications or insertion of additional trocars.

Objectives: Indications for surgical treatment of bladder diverticula include tumor, lower urinary tract symptoms refractory to medical treatment, renal dysfunction or recurrent urinary tract infections. We describe the technique and report the outcomes of robotic bladder diverticulectomy at our institution., Methods: A chart review of patients who underwent robotic bladder diverticulectomy at our institution from 2007 to 2010 was carried out. Indications for the procedure were: lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) not responding to medical treatment (2 patients), ureteral obstruction (1 patient), tumor arising in a diverticulum (2 patients) and diverticulum secondary to neurogenic bladder (1 patient). One patient also had renal dysfunction associated with ureteral insertion into the diverticulum and therefore underwent ipsilateral ureteroneocystostomy. Other additional procedures included transurethral resection of the prostate (1 patient) and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection (1 patient). Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed., Results: Six patients (median age 61.5 years, range 19-75) underwent da Vinci diverticulectomy using a transperitoneal approach without the need for open conversion. Median operative time was 232 min (135-360 min.). Median estimated blood loss was 100 mL (50-150 mL). The Foley catheter was removed after a negative cystogram and median time to catheter removal was 7 days (7-12 days). Median hospital stay was 3 days (2-5 days). The only complication was a urinary tract infection managed with antibiotics., Conclusions: Robotic surgery represents a reasonable minimally invasive treatment option for resection of bladder diverticula when indicated., (© 2011 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Background: Minimally invasive approaches to partial nephrectomy have been rapidly gaining popularity but require advanced laparoscopic surgical skills. Renal hilar tumors, due to their anatomic location, pose additional technical challenges to the operating surgeon., Objective: We compared the outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) for hilar and nonhilar tumors in our large multicenter contemporary series of patients., Design, Setting, and Participants: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data on 446 consecutive patients who underwent RPN by renal surgeons experienced in minimally invasive techniques at four academic institutions from June 2006 to March 2010. Patients were stratified into two groups: those with hilar lesions and those with nonhilar lesions., Measurements: Patient demographics, operative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes, including oncologic outcomes, were recorded., Results and Limitations: Forty-one patients (9%) had hilar renal masses; 405 patients (91%) had nonhilar masses. There was no statistical differences in patient demographics except for larger median tumor size in the hilar cohort (3.2 cm vs 2.6 cm; p=0.001). The only significant difference in operative outcomes was an increase in warm ischemia times for the hilar group versus the nonhilar group (26.3±7.4 min vs 19.6±10.0 min; p=<0.0001). There were no differences in postoperative outcomes; however, there was a trend for increased risk of malignancy and higher stage tumors in the hilar lesion group. Final pathologic margin status was similar in both groups. Only one patient in the nonhilar group had evidence of recurrence at 21 mo. The study was limited by the lack of standard anatomic classification of renal tumors and the potential influence of the surgeons' prior robotic experience., Conclusions: The data represent the largest series of its kind and strongly suggest that RPN is a safe, effective, and feasible option for the minimally invasive approach to renal hilar tumors with no increased risk of adverse outcomes compared with nonhilar tumors in the hands of experienced robotic surgeons., (Copyright © 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We describe a case of retrocaval ureter treated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS)., Methods: A 26-year-old female was referred to our institution with a history of intermittent right-sided flank pain. Radiological imaging demonstrated hydronephrosis, suggesting the presence of a retrocaval ureter. A LESS repair was planned., Results: Retrograde pyelogram confirmed a classic appearance for retrocaval ureter. A ureteral stent was positioned. The patient was placed in modified flank position. A 2-cm, completely concealed umbilical access was created, through which a single port access platform was positioned. An in-line endoscope was used for visualization. Articulating instruments were used during initial dissection. The entire ureter was mobilized posterior to the vena cava and transected at the caudal-most point where the dilated portion of the proximal ureter ended. The distal ureter was repositioned lateral to the inferior vena cava and spatulated laterally. The proximal ureter was spatulated medially. Two 4-0 Vicryl sutures were used for the ureteroureteral anastomosis. A separate 2-mm grasper placed in the right lower quadrant was used to assist with suture reconstruction. A drain was left through the umbilicus. Blood loss was minimal. Total operative time was 3 hours. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 2. At the 3-month follow-up, diuretic radionuclide scan revealed no evidence of obstruction of the right kidney and the patient was symptom-free., Conclusions: Albeit challenging, LESS repair for retrocaval ureter is a feasible procedure that can be considered as a treatment option for this rare anatomic anomaly., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) presented in abstract form at the annual World Congress of Endourology (WCE) and evaluate their course of subsequent publication., Materials and Methods: All RCTs presented in abstract form at the 2004, 2005, and 2006 WCE annual meetings were identified for review. Quality of reporting was assessed by applying a standardized 14-item evaluation tool based on the Consolidated Standards for the Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) statement. The subsequent publication rate for the corresponding studies by scanning Medline was also evaluated. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed., Results: A total of 94 RCTs (3.5% of 2669) were identified for review: 21 in 2004, 36 in 2005, and 37 in 2006. Overall, 45 (47.3% of the total) were subsequently published as a full length indexed manuscript with a mean time to publication of 16.4 ± 13.2 months. Approximately 61 (60%) identified the study design as RCT in the abstract title. None reported the method of randomization. In studies that reported blinding (seven, 11% of 62), five were double blinded and two single blinded. Adverse events were reported in 38% of cases. Only 10% of the abstracts complied fully with more than 10 items according to our CONSORT-based checklist, whereas the majority of them failed to comply with most of the CONSORT requirements., Conclusions: Although representing a small portion of the overall number of abstracts, there has been a steady increase of presentation of RCTs at the WCE over the assessed 3-year period. Most of the time they are recognized as RCTs in the abstract title. When applying the CONSORT criteria, necessary information to assess their methodologic quality is incomplete in some cases.

Unlabelled: Single-port transumbilical laparoscopy has emerged as an attempt to further enhance cosmetic benefits and reduce morbidity of minimally invasive surgery. Within a short span, several clinical reports have emerged in the urologic literature. As this field is poised to move forward, a complete understanding of its evolution and current status seems imperative. We have summarized and reviewed the history of Single-Port across surgical disciplines. This review emphasizes nomenclature, surgical technique, instrumentation, and perioperative outcomes., Evidence Acquisition: Using the National Library of Medicine database, the English language literature was reviewed for the past 40 years. Keyword searches included scarless, scar free, single-port/trocar/incision, laparoendoscopic single site surgery intraumbilical, and transumbilical. Within the bibliography of selected references, additional sources were retrieved., Evidence Synthesis: The major findings and surgical techniques described in these papers, are summarized in a chronological and subject-grouped manner., Conclusions: Single-port has made its initial forays into laparoscopic surgery. Ongoing refinement in technique and instrumentation is likely to expand its future role., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To report the first series of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for radical cystectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. The development of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and its application to urothelial malignancy has not been previously evaluated., Methods: A novel, single multichannel port and flexible laparoscopic instruments and laparoscope were used for all procedures. The eligible patients had transitional cell carcinoma that was muscle invasive or refractory to intravesical therapy. Locally advanced disease, previous abdominal or pelvic surgery or radiotherapy, or those desiring orthotopic reconstruction were excluded. No additional ports were needed, and lymphadenectomy was performed using an extended template up to the aortic bifurcation., Results: A total of 3 patients (2 men and 1 woman) underwent radical cystectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. All the procedures were completed successfully. All patients underwent extracorporeal urinary diversion by way of extension of the umbilical port site. The operative time was 315 ± 40 minutes, and the blood loss was minimal (217 ± 29 mL). The pathologic evaluation revealed negative margins and negative lymph node involvement (mean number of nodes 16 ± 3). All patients were discharged within 1 week (6 ± 1 days) with minimal postoperative pain according to the visual analog pain scale (0-1 of 10). At a minimum of 2 years of follow-up (range 24-26 months), no evidence of recurrent or metastatic disease was detected., Conclusions: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for radical cystectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection is feasible and safe for select patients. Adequate lymph node dissection was possible through a single multichannel port. The long-term oncologic evaluation of these patients awaits; however, the preliminary outcomes have been promising., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To provide an evidence-based analysis on the status and perspectives of laparoscopic training in urologic surgery., Methods: A thorough review of the current literature was performed as of January 31, 2009, using the Medline database through a PubMed search. The search protocol included a free-text query using the following terms: "training," "urologic laparoscopy," "urology," and "laparoscopy." Suitable articles were selected on the basis of the study content. The following issues were addressed: prediction of laparoscopic skills and transfer of training in clinical practice; homemade and commercially available laparoscopic trainers and simulators; training models for specific laparoscopic procedures; mentored training programs; formal training programs; and the impact of robotics in laparoscopic training., Results: Currently available tools predicting laparoscopic skills lack adequate validation to justify their widespread adoption. There still is not enough evidence to show definite transfer of skills from currently available simulators to the operating theater. Learning opportunities continue to evolve. Specific models have been developed for complex procedures. Various informal training programs exist, yet most urologists will not be able to complete a formal fellowship. Postgraduate urologists may possibly be more rapidly and efficiently trained using a structured mentoring program. Robotics is likely to have an increasing role in teaching urological laparoscopy., Conclusions: Despite progress in recent years and an extensive amount of data from the urological literature, the ideal training program in urological laparoscopy remains a goal to be determined objectively.

Objectives: To present comparative outcomes among matched patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) by a single surgeon at a single institution., Methods: Between March 2002 and August 2009, a retrospective review of 261 consecutive patients who underwent LPN (n = 186) or RPN (n = 75) by a single surgeon was performed. Patients were matched for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and tumor size, side, and location. Perioperative outcomes were compared., Results: A matched cohort of 150 patients who underwent RPN (n = 75) or LPN (n = 75) were compared. There was no significant difference between the 2 cohorts with respect to patient age (P = .17), BMI (P = .68), ASA score (P = .96), preoperative estimated glomerulofiltration rate (eGFR; P = .54), or tumor size (P = .17). Mean operative time for RPN was 200 vs 197 minutes for LPN (P = .75). Mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was higher in the RPN cohort (323 vs 222 mL, P = .01). There was no significant difference with respect to warm ischemia time (18.2 minutes vs 20.3 minutes, P = .27), length of hospitalization (P = .84), percent change in eGFR (P = .80), or adverse events (P = .52). All surgical margins were negative., Conclusions: Although initial surgical experience with RPN was included in this study and compared with a vast experience in LPN by the same surgeon, RPN offers at least comparable outcomes to LPN., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate operative outcomes among patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) without renal hilar clamping., Patients and Methods: This was a prospective observational study of patients undergoing RPN under perfused conditions (pRPN). Patients with solitary, radiographically enhancing renal cortical lesions gave consent for pRPN. Salient demographic data, including age, body mass index (BMI) and preoperative tumour size were obtained. Operative data, including mean operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and the presence of any complications, were collected. Renal function was evaluated before and after RPN. Remote adverse events were noted. The pRPN group was then retrospectively compared to a contemporary group of patients who had RPN with renal hilar occlusion. Endpoints for comparison included operative time, warm ischaemia time, EBL, length of hospitalization, and the rate of adverse events., Results: Between February 2008 and December 2008, eight had underwent pRPN; the mean age was 59.3 years, mean BMI 28.7 kg/m(2), mean operative time 167 min, mean EBL 569 mL and mean hospitalization 3.75 days. Pathology showed renal cell carcinoma in five patients and oncocytoma in three; the mean tumour size was 2.4 cm. Final pathological margins were negative in all patients. Adverse events included one transfusion and one deep venous thrombosis. When compared to the contemporary group who had RPN with hilar clamping, the operative time was shorter (P = 0.035) and EBL greater (P = 0.018) in the pRPN group. There was no significant difference between the groups in transfusion rate, and no significant difference in renal function before and after surgery either group., Conclusions: For selected small renal cortical masses, RPN is safe without renal hilar occlusion. The EBL was higher during pRPN but with no significant difference in the rate of transfusion.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to review recent advances and to provide future perspectives in renal focal therapy., Methods: Most relevant available data from current literature and reports from major urological meetings as well as clinical and experimental experience at our institution have been considered., Results: Effective treatment of incidentally detected small renal masses continues to evolve. Major recent advances have been made toward three main directions: enhancing accuracy of probe positioning, improving ablative energy efficiency, and reducing treatment-related morbidity., Conclusions: Renal focal therapy can offer the advantage of combining a nephron-sparing surgery together with a minimally invasive approach. Technical refinements will include emerging clinical data for radiofrequency and cryoablation. Single-port access renal cryotherapy has been shown to be feasible and safe. Although in its infancy, natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery might represent a further step toward scarless surgery. Radiosurgery is under investigation and oncological outcomes are awaited to determine its role. Stereotactic surgical navigation and robotic needle placement would facilitate and increase the accuracy of percutaneous probe placement.