151. Comparative evaluation of SUV, tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR), and dual time point measurements for assessment of the metabolic uptake rate in FDG PET
- Author
-
Jörg van den Hoff, Alexandr Lougovski, Kilian Ego, Ingo G. Steffen, Frank Hofheinz, Ivayla Apostolova, and Holger Amthauer
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,FDG ,Uptake ratio ,Standardized uptake value ,PET FDG Tumor-to-blood ratio SUR ,Patlak plot ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Comparative evaluation ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Uptake rate ,Original Research ,Fluorodeoxyglucose ,SUR ,business.industry ,Tumor-to-blood ratio ,fungi ,PET ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Radiology ,Linear correlation ,business ,Nuclear medicine ,medicine.drug ,Dual time point - Abstract
Background We have demonstrated recently that the tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) is superior to tumor standardized uptake value (SUV) as a surrogate of the metabolic uptake rate K m of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), overcoming several of the known shortcomings of the SUV approach: excellent linear correlation of SUR and K m from Patlak analysis was found using dynamic imaging of liver metastases. However, due to the perfectly standardized uptake period used for SUR determination and the comparatively short uptake period, these results are not automatically valid and applicable for clinical whole-body examinations in which the uptake periods (T) are distinctly longer and can vary considerably. Therefore, the aim of this work was to investigate the correlation between SUR derived from clinical static whole-body scans and K m-surrogate derived from dual time point (DTP) measurements. Methods DTP 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 90 consecutive patients with histologically proven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the PET images, the primary tumor was delineated with an adaptive threshold method. For determination of the blood SUV, an aorta region of interest (ROI) was delineated manually in the attenuation CT and transferred to the PET image. Blood SUV was computed as the mean value of the aorta ROI. SUR values were computed as ratio of tumor SUV and blood SUV. SUR values from the early time point of each DTP measurement were scan time corrected to 75 min postinjection (SURtc). As surrogate of K m, we used the SUR(T) slope, K slope, derived from DTP measurements since it is proportional to the latter under the given circumstances. The correlation of SUV and SURtc with K slope was investigated. The prognostic value of SUV, SURtc, and K slope for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was investigated with univariate Cox regression in a homogeneous subgroup (N=31) treated with primary chemoradiation. Results Correlation analysis revealed for both, SUV and SURtc, a clear linear correlation with K slope (P
- Published
- 2016