151. Low-Dose Computed Tomography Reduces Radiation Exposure by 90% Compared With Traditional Computed Tomography Among Patients Undergoing Hip-Preservation Surgery
- Author
-
Alvin W. Su, Eric P. Eutsler, Travis J. Hillen, James R. Ross, Christopher M. Larson, Jeffrey J. Nepple, Asheesh Bedi, and John C. Clohisy
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Radiation Dosage ,Effective dose (radiation) ,Surgical planning ,Article ,Trees ,Body Mass Index ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Arthroscopy ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Hip Dislocation ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Arthrography ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,030222 orthopedics ,Univariate analysis ,Hip ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Retrospective cohort study ,Middle Aged ,Radiation Exposure ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Osteotomy ,Surgery ,Hip Joint ,Female ,Tomography ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,business ,Body mass index ,Cohort study - Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the delivered radiation dose between a low-dose hip CT (Computed Tomography) scan protocol and traditional hip CT scan protocols (referred to as: traditional CT). METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative cohort study. A group of patients who underwent hip preservation surgery (including arthroscopy, surgical hip dislocation, or periacetabular osteotomy procedures) at our institution between 2016-2017 were identified. Patients were excluded if they had a BMI>35 kg/m(2), previous surgery, or absence of a radiation dose report. The low-dose group included patients undergoing hip CT at our institution utilizing a standardized protocol of 100 kVp, 100 mAs and limited scanning field. The traditional CT group included patients who had hip CT scans performed at outside institutions. The total effective dose (E(hip)), effective dose per millimeter-body-length-scanned (E(mm)), and the patients’ age, BMI were compared by univariate analysis. The correlation of E(hip) to BMI was assessed. RESULTS: Forty-one consecutive patients were included in the low-dose group, and 18 consecutive patients were included in the traditional CT group. Low-dose CT resulted in 90% reduction in radiation exposure compared to traditional CT (E(hip)=0.97 ± 0.28 vs. 9.68 ± 6.67mSv, p
- Published
- 2019