151. Immediate and one-year outcome of intracoronary stent implantation in small coronary arteries with 2.5-mm stents
- Author
-
Jassim Al Suwaidi, Peter B. Berger, Diane E. Grill, Charanjit S. Rihal, Malcolm R. Bell, Kirk N. Garratt, and David R. Holmes
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Minnesota ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Coronary Disease ,Coronary Angiography ,Balloon ,Severity of Illness Index ,Coronary artery disease ,Angioplasty ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Myocardial infarction ,Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Stent ,Prognosis ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Survival Rate ,Coronary arteries ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Cardiology ,Female ,Stents ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Complication ,Follow-Up Studies ,Artery - Abstract
Background The role of coronary stenting in the treatment of stenoses in small coronary arteries with use of 2.5-mm stents is not well defined. Methods and Results Between January 1995 and August 1999, 651 patients with stenoses in small coronary arteries were treated with 2.5-mm stents (n = 108) or 2.5-mm conventional balloon angioplasty (BA) (n = 543). Patients who received treatment with both 2.5-mm and ≥3.0-mm stent placement or balloons were excluded. Procedural success and complication rates as well as 1-year follow-up outcomes were examined. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups, except patients in the stent group were more likely to have hypertension and a family history of coronary artery disease and less likely to have prior myocardial infarction. Angiographic success rates were higher in the stent group (97.2% vs 90.2%, P =.02). In-hospital complication rates were comparable between the two groups. Among successfully treated patients, 1-year follow-up revealed no significant differences in the survival (96.2% vs 95.2%, P =.89) or the frequency of Q-wave myocardial infarction (0% vs 0.4%, P =.60) or coronary artery bypass grafting (8.4% vs 6.8%, P =.89) between the stent and BA groups, respectively. However, patients in the stent group were more likely to have adverse cardiac events (35.4% vs 22.1%, P =.05). Stent use after excluding GR II stent use, however, was not independently associated with reduced cardiac events at follow-up (relative risk 1.3 [95% confidence interval 0.8-2.3], P =.30). Conclusions Intracoronary stent implantation of stenoses in small coronary arteries with 2.5-mm stents can be carried out with high success and acceptable complication rates. However, compared with BA alone, stent use was not associated with improved outcome through 1 year of follow-up. (Am Heart J 2000;140:898-905.)
- Published
- 2000
- Full Text
- View/download PDF