Search

3063 Background: LAG-3, an immune checkpoint receptor involved in T-cell regulation, is frequently co-expressed with PD-1. LAG-3 and PD-1 signaling contributes to immune cell exhaustion and reduces the immune response to tumor cells. Dual inhibition of PD-1 and LAG-3 may reactivate the T-cell response better than blockade of either individual pathway. Here, we report combined safety data from 4 trials investigating BI 754111, an anti-LAG-3 mAb, in combination with BI 754091, an anti-PD-1 mAb, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Data from 2 phase I dose-escalation/expansion trials, 1 phase I imaging trial, and 1 phase II trial were included. Eligible patients had advanced and/or metastatic solid tumors with measurable disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1. Patients received BI 754111 (intravenously [iv], 4–800 mg) in combination with BI 754091 (iv, 240 mg fixed dose) every 3 weeks (q3w). Patients remained on treatment until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. In each trial, safety was assessed by incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs), and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for AEs, version 5. Results: Overall, 321 patients were treated with BI 754111 in combination with BI 754091 (200 [62%] male; median age, 63 years [range 18–88]). Median treatment exposure was 85 days (range 9–625). Of these patients, 282 (87.9%) had any AE (G≥3 in 99 [30.8%]). 285 patients received the 600 mg recommended phase II dose of BI 754111 plus BI 754091 240 mg q3w. Median treatment exposure in these patients was 74 days (range, 8–590). The table shows the 3 most common AEs and 4 most common immune-related AEs, and their frequency. 21 (7.4%) patients had AEs leading to study drug discontinuation, most commonly infusion-related reactions (IRRs) in 6 (2.1%) patients. Serious AEs (all-cause) occurred in 77 patients (27.0%), most commonly pleural effusion in 6 (2.1%) and deep vein thrombosis in 4 (1.4%) patients. 2 patients (0.7%) experienced an AE resulting in death (cardiac tamponade and acute kidney injury, both related to underlying diseases). Conclusions: The combination of BI 754111 and BI 754091 had a manageable safety profile, similar to other checkpoint inhibitors. Clinical trial information: NCT03156114, NCT03433898, NCT03697304, NCT03780725 . [Table: see text]

TPS9625 Background: Despite recent advances in the treatment of NSQ NSCLC, including the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) into first-line treatment of all patients, novel therapies are necessary at disease progression. Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 (CEACAM5), a cell-surface glycoprotein, is overexpressed in several tumor types, including NSQ NSCLC; ~20% of patients express high CEACAM5 levels. SAR408701 is an ADC combining a humanized antibody targeting CEACAM5 with the potent cytotoxic maytansinoid derivative DM4 and is expected to selectively deliver DM4 to CEACAM5-expressing cancer cells. In an interim analysis of a first-in-human study (NCT02187848) in patients with NSQ NSCLC and CEACAM5 expression in ≥50% of tumor cells, SAR408701 administered 100 mg/m² every 2 weeks showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 23% and a favorable safety profile (Gazzah A et al J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:15, 9072). Methods: In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, patients receive either SAR408701 100 mg/m² IV every 2 weeks or the standard of care treatment docetaxel 75 mg/m² IV every 3 weeks. Randomization is stratified on ECOG performance status (PS), previous ICI treatment (sequential vs combination), and geographical region. Patients are ≥18 years with metastatic NSQ NSCLC after platinum-based chemotherapy and ICI treatment (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibody), express CEACAM5 in ≥50% of tumor cells at ≥2+ intensity (central testing), and have ECOG PS 0–1. Exclusion criteria include untreated brain metastases, history of corneal disorders, and prior treatment with docetaxel, maytansinoid derivatives, or CEACAM5-targeting drugs. Tumor imaging occurs at baseline and every 8 weeks until disease progression. Primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST v1.1 by independent blinded review committee) and overall survival (OS), both analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method, stratified log-rank test, and stratified Cox proportional hazard model. Study success is defined either on PFS or OS, with a strong type-I error control for multiple hypotheses. Secondary endpoints are ORR and duration of response (RECIST v1.1), health related quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-LC13), and safety (adverse events graded by NCI CTCAE v5). Approximately 554 randomized patients (277 per arm) is adequate to reach both PFS and OS events. The study opened in Nov 2019, and as of Feb 7, 2020, 20 sites in 8 countries are activated. Clinical trial information: NCT04154956 .

3502 Background: CX-2029 is a PROBODY drug conjugate (PDC) of MMAE, a potent microtubule inhibitor, directed against CD71 (transferrin receptor 1). In addition to being an abundant tumor antigen, CD71 is highly expressed on normal cells, precluding targeting by a traditional antibody drug conjugate (ADC). PDCs are masked ADCs, unmasked predominantly by tumor-associated proteases, thereby restricting target engagement to tumors. Both a CD71 PDC and ADC displayed broad activity in multiple xenograft tumor models; in toxicology studies, the PDC was tolerable at doses consistent with efficacy in non-clinical tumor models while the ADC was not. Methods: In a phase 1/2 first-in-human study of PDC CX-2029 in advanced solid tumors (N CT03543813 ), pts with ECOG 0–1 and ≥1 prior systemic therapy were enrolled into escalating dose cohorts of the PDC CX-2029 given IV every 21 days. Endpoints included evaluation of MTD, safety, antitumor activity, and potential biomarkers; plasma and tissue samples were collected for PK/PD analyses. Preliminary results are reported. Results: As of 30 November 2019, 34 pts were enrolled (median age 59 y; 59% male; 71% ECOG 1; median [range] of 3 [1–16] prior therapies). Pts received a median of 3 (1–12) CX-2029 doses. Starting dose for escalation was 0.1 mg/kg. Following a single CX-2029 dose, median molar ratio of masked CX-2029 to total CX-2029 for AUCtau was 0.938 (0.864–0.942); the ratio of free MMAE to total CX-2029 was

3510 Background: Pyrotinib is a potent, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that blocks signal transduction through the erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog (erbB) receptors, which has previously demonstrated promising antitumor activity in patients (pts) with breast cancers. We studied the safety and efficacy of pyrotinib in pts with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other solid tumors with activating human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER2, ERBB2) alterations. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter phase 1 dose expansion basket trial of pyrotinib given 400mg oral daily at 28-day cycles. Expansion cohorts included pts with HER2-mutant NSCLC and advanced solid tumors with HER2 mutation or amplification. HER2 testing was conducted using next generation sequencing or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Primary endpoints included toxicities as evaluated by NCI CTCAE v5.0, and overall response rate (ORR) as evaluated by RECIST v1.1. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 62 pts were enrolled. The median age was 67 (range 40 – 86 years), 61% were female and the median lines of prior systemic therapy was 3 (range 1-11). There were no treatment related deaths. The most common adverse events were diarrhea (96.8%), nausea (82.3%) and vomiting (41.9%). The only ≥ grade 3 treatment related toxicity was diarrhea (24.2%). Prophylactic anti-diarrhea treatment was introduced to facilitate continuation of pyrotinib. At the Jan 13, 2020 cut-off, 24 pts with HER2-mutant NSCLC (20, i.e. 65% of which were the A775_G776insYVMA mutation) and 18 pts with HER2-mutant or amplified solid tumors completed end of Cycle 2 imaging scan and were evaluable for tumor responses. The ORR was 19% (8/42, 95% CI 7-31%); confirmed responses include a complete response (CR) and 3 partial responses (PRs) in HER2-mutant NSCLC, and 4 PRs in HER2-amplified cholangiocarcinoma, ovarian, endometrial and salivary gland carcinomas. There were 7 stable disease ≥ 6 months. Median progression-free survival was 5.4 months (95% CI 4.4-7.3). Conclusions: Pyrotinib demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging efficacy in pts with heavily pre-treated HER2-mutant NSCLC. Furthermore, it is the first TKI to produce durable responses in pts with HER2-amplified biliary tract, ovarian, endometrial and salivary gland cancers. These results warrant further clinical development of pyrotinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02500199 .

TPS9630 Background: Primary or secondary resistance to anti-PD-1 may be due to loss of T cell function. Persistent antigen stimulation can lead to impaired CD8+ T cell function, which often results in acquired resistance to PD-1 inhibition. It is unclear whether reinvigoration of tumor infiltrating cells or recruitment of novel T cells impart the activity of anti-PD-1 therapy. The bone marrow is a reservoir for antigen experienced memory T cells. We have previously shown that MILs can be generated for patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors including patients with NSCLC. MILs are the product of the activation and expansion of bone marrow T cells with a polyantigenic memory phenotype that recognize tumor antigens, are cytotoxic to autologous tumor and are able to persist over a long period of time. In a pre-clinical study of NSCLC, MILs were able to be expanded in all patients tested. Furthermore, all of the NSCLC products tested showed specificity to shared NSCLC antigens. The combination of adoptive cell therapy (ACT) with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) has distinctive positive effects on CD8 and CD4 T cell subsets, with the possibility for complete tumor control. We hypothesize that patients with NSCLC who have relapsed on anti-PD-1 treatment could benefit from an infusion of non-exhausted, central memory-enhanced, antigen specific T cells i.e. MILs which can delay the induction of tumor-associated anergy and augment the overall effectiveness of immunotherapy. Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC who have progressed following prior anti-PD-1 therapy, with sufficient bone marrow reserve and an ECOG 0-1 are eligible. In eligible patients, bone marrow (200 mL) will be harvested and processed. Patients will undergo lymphodepletion (fludarabine 300 mg/m2/day and cyclophosphamide 30 mg/m2/day on days -5,-4,-3) followed by infusion of MILs on day 0. In Part 1, up to 6 patients will be administered MILs alone on day 0. In Part 2, approximately 20 subjects will be administered MILs on day 0 followed by NIVO 480 mg Q4W starting on day 1. The objectives of the study are to assess safety of MILs alone and in combination with NIVO, as well as efficacy. The first patient was treated in December 2019. Clinical trial information: NCT04069936 .

Although lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States and worldwide, the rate at which Americans are dying from lung cancer is declining. Improving survival can be explained, in large part, by a growing understanding of the heterogeneous biology of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as recent successes of novel therapeutic strategies more effective and tolerable than platinum-based chemotherapy. We now recognize distinct subtypes of NSCLC, defined by molecular profiling and immunohistochemistry, with different treatment algorithms, including targeted small molecular inhibitors and immunotherapy for each. Both biomarker selection and preferred frontline strategies continue to evolve rapidly, making it difficult for many practitioners to keep up. In this review, we will first describe the recommended initial workup for a patient with advanced or metastatic NSCLC in 2018; next, we present an algorithm to aid oncologists in the selection of the most appropriate therapy for treatment-naive patients with NSCLC, and finally, we offer a look into future treatment options through a discussion of ongoing clinical trials.

Background: Inhibition of the PD-1 pathway is an effective immunotherapeutic approach in a subset of patients with various solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Blockade of the PD-1 pathway leads to overexpression of other checkpoint receptors, including LAG3, potentially providing an escape pathway for tumor cells. LAG-3 signaling contributes to immune cell exhaustion, preventing T-cell proliferation. Dual blockade of PD-1 and LAG-3 has the potential to synergistically restore T-cell functionality and therefore enhance antitumor immune responses. This Phase I trial is evaluating the combination of BI 754111, an anti-LAG-3 monoclonal antibody (mAb), and BI 754091, an anti-PD-1 mAb, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This open-label, Phase I study is being conducted in two parts. Part 1 (dose-escalation) enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors; no dose limiting toxicities were reported and BI 754111 600 mg intravenous (iv) every 3 weeks (q3w) in combination with BI 754091 (240 mg iv q3w) was selected for further assessment in part 2 (dose expansion). In part 2, patients are being enrolled in 4 cohorts: 1) anti-PD-(L)1 pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that progressed after having achieved benefit on previous PD-(L)1; 2) previously treated (anti-PD-[L]1 naïve) MSS mCRC; 3) anti-PD-(L)1 pretreated TMB >10 and/or MSI-h and/or dMMR solid tumors; 4) treatment-naive NSCLC with EGFR and ALK wild type tumors. Primary endpoint for the expansion cohorts is objective response. Safety and pharmacokinetics of the combination were secondary endpoints. The mCRC cohort is fully recruited; other cohorts are open to recruitment. This abstract presents data from the MSS CRC cohort. Results. 40 patients with MSS mCRC were enrolled (27 male [67.5%]; median age 56.5 years [range 25–85]; median of 3.0 prior regimens [range 1–10]) and received BI 754111 600 mg q3w in combination with BI 754091 240 mg q3w. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were reported in 18 patients (45%); most commonly infusion-related reactions (10.0%), myalgia (10.0%), hypothyroidism (7.5%), diarrhea (7.5%) and arthralgia (7.5%). Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 4 patients (grade 3 colitis, grade 3 maculo-papular rash, grade 4 diabetic ketoacidosis [n=2]). Treatment-emergent immune-related AEs occurred in 9 patients; of these, 4 had grade 3/4 events (colitis and maculo-papular rash [grade 3] and diabetic ketoacidosis [grade 4; n=2]). To date, 2 (5%) patients achieved a partial response, and 12 (30%) achieved stable disease. Updates will be presented. Conclusion. BI 754111 + BI 754091 was well-tolerated and showed preliminary activity in patients with previously treated MSS mCRC. Assessment of the combination in other cohorts is ongoing. Citation Format: Johanna Bendell, Susanna V Ulahannan, Quincy Chu, Manish Patel, Ben George, Renee Landsberg, Mabrouk Elgadi, Christine Duffy, Ralph Graeser, Wenbo Tang, Michael Merger, Miaomiao Ge, Melissa Johnson. A Phase I, dose finding study of BI 754111, an anti-LAG-3 antibody, in combination with BI 754091, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors: preliminary results from the microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C027. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-C027

Background Tumor-specific neoantigens provide personalized targets for immunotherapy. Vaccines against epitopes predicted by in silico approaches very rarely induce CD4+ and CD8+ ex vivo T cell responses regardless of formulation. ATLAS selects neoantigens for vaccine inclusion using ex vivo screening of all patient-specific mutations to identify pre-existing CD4+ or CD8+ T cell responses and to exclude inhibitory peptides that suppress immunity and accelerate tumor progression. Preliminary data suggest that the inhibitory peptide profile may predict tumor response to immunotherapy. Methods GEN-009-101 is a phase I/IIa study testing safety, immunogenicity and clinical activity in immune responsive tumors. After next-generation tumor sequencing and ATLAS testing of autologous leukocytes, up to 20 stimulatory synthetic long peptides adjuvanted with poly-ICLC make each personalized vaccine. The immunogenicity pilot has enrolled 9 patients in remission to receive GEN-009 monotherapy. Results 4 patients have participated to the primary immunogenicity readout at day 50 (some data pending). The 17 doses given across patients have induced only mild local discomfort and no DLT. ATLAS results show high interpatient variability. Vaccination has generated immune responses against 94% of administered peptides, and both CD8+ and CD4+ responses in a 44hr ex vivo fluorospot assay. Ten-day in vitro stimulation (IVS) assays result in broader immune responses.Table1178PDTablePTTumor TypeSomatic Mutations/MbATLAS NeoantigensPost-vaccination Response*StimulatoryInhibitoryex vivo CD4/CD8IVS CD4/CD8Total Positive1NSCLC1.256010% / 40%100% / 20%100%2Bladder3.1516450% / 38%63% / 50%88%3Melanoma28.69199416% / 38%75% / TBDTBD4Bladder3.53181TBDTBDTBD5NSCLC3.5616955% / 45%TBDTBD*number of positive peptides/total peptides immunized Conclusions GEN-009 is a neoantigen vaccine that identifies tumor specific immune targets from the individual patient's repertoire. Immunogenicity data show that ATLAS can, with very high frequency, identify relevant neoantigens and exclude suppressive peptides. Clinical vaccination with PD-1 blockade is in process. Clinical trial identification NCT03633110, issued 6-Aug-2018. Legal entity responsible for the study Genocea Biosciences. Funding Genocea Biosciences. Disclosure P. Twardowski: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bayer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Janssen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Astellas; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb. M.L. Johnson: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Genentech / Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Mirati; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): LOXO; Advisory / Consultancy: Calithera; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Araxes Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Mersana Therapeutics ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BeiGene; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Incyte; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Guardant Health; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Ribon Therapeutics ; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AbbVie; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Spouse / Financial dependant: Clovis; Spouse / Financial dependant: Otsuka Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): BerGenBio; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: EMD Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genmab; Research grant / Funding (institution): Stemcentrix; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Checkpoint Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Array Biopharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Regeneron; Research grant / Funding (institution): Apexigen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Tarveda; Research grant / Funding (institution): Adaptimmune; Research grant / Funding (institution): Syndax; Research grant / Funding (institution): Neovia; Research grant / Funding (institution): Hengrui Therapeutics, INC; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Daiichi - Sankyo; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lycera; Research grant / Funding (institution): G1 Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Dynavax; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cytomx; Research grant / Funding (institution): Birdie; Research grant / Funding (institution): Corvus; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genocea; Research grant / Funding (institution): Gritstone; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Kadmon; Research grant / Funding (institution): Acerta; Research grant / Funding (institution): Takeda; Research grant / Funding (institution): Shattuck Labs; Research grant / Funding (institution): GlaxoSmithKline; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Exelixis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sysmex Inostics; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Vapotherm. M. Stein: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory / Consultancy: Exelixis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Oncoceutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen Oncology; Research grant / Funding (institution): Medivation/Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Advaxis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Suzhou Kintor Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): Harpoon; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genocea; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Nektar; Research grant / Funding (institution): Seattle Genetics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Xencor. M.L. Gillison: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Aspyrian; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Britsol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: GlaxoSmithKline; Advisory / Consultancy: Genocea; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: NewLink; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: Ventana; Advisory / Consultancy: Biomimetix. L. McNeil: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genocea. L. Dowal: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genocea. D. DeOliveira: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genocea. M. Jain: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genocea. J. Price: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genocea. R. Hernandez: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genocea. A. DeCillis: Advisory / Consultancy: Genocea; Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Exelixis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pyramid; Advisory / Consultancy: Daiichi Sankyo. N. Singh: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Genocea. T. Davis: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Genocea. J. Flechtner: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Genocea. R.B. Cohen: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Genocea; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Innate Biopharma; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): HEAT Biologics; Advisory / Consultancy: Cantargia; Advisory / Consultancy: Tmunity; Research grant / Funding (institution): Arrys; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celldex. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Background No systemic therapies have been approved for the treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. This cancer may be responsive to immune therapy, because the mutation burden of the tumor is high and the disease risk is strongly associated with immunosuppression. In the dose-escalation portion of the phase 1 study of cemiplimab, a deep and durable response was observed in a patient with metastatic cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. Methods We report the results of the phase 1 study of cemiplimab for expansion cohorts of patients with locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, as well as the results of the pivotal phase 2 study for a cohort of patients with metastatic disease (metastatic-disease cohort). In both studies, the patients received an intravenous dose of cemiplimab (3 mg per kilogram of body weight) every 2 weeks and were assessed for a response every 8 weeks. In the phase 2 study, the primary end point was the response rate, as assessed by independent central review. Results In the expansion cohorts of the phase 1 study, a response to cemiplimab was observed in 13 of 26 patients (50%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 30 to 70). In the metastatic-disease cohort of the phase 2 study, a response was observed in 28 of 59 patients (47%; 95% CI, 34 to 61). The median follow-up was 7.9 months in the metastatic-disease cohort of the phase 2 study. Among the 28 patients who had a response, the duration of response exceeded 6 months in 57%, and 82% continued to have a response and to receive cemiplimab at the time of data cutoff. Adverse events that occurred in at least 15% of the patients in the metastatic-disease cohort of the phase 2 study were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, constipation, and rash; 7% of the patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event. Conclusions Among patients with advanced cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, cemiplimab induced a response in approximately half the patients and was associated with adverse events that usually occur with immune checkpoint inhibitors. (Funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02383212 and NCT02760498 .).

Purpose Advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK) fusion-positive non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) are effectively treated with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, clinical outcomes in these patients vary, and the benefit of TKIs is limited as a result of acquired resistance. Emerging data suggest that the ALK fusion variant may affect clinical outcome, but the molecular basis for this association is unknown. Patients and Methods We identified 129 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC with known ALK variants. ALK resistance mutations and clinical outcomes on ALK TKIs were retrospectively evaluated according to ALK variant. A Foundation Medicine data set of 577 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC was also examined. Results The most frequent ALK variants were EML4-ALK variant 1 in 55 patients (43%) and variant 3 in 51 patients (40%). We analyzed 77 tumor biopsy specimens from patients with variants 1 and 3 who had progressed on an ALK TKI. ALK resistance mutations were significantly more common in variant 3 than in variant 1 (57% v 30%; P = .023). In particular, ALK G1202R was more common in variant 3 than in variant 1 (32% v 0%; P < .001). Analysis of the Foundation Medicine database revealed similar associations of variant 3 with ALK resistance mutation and with G1202R ( P = .010 and .015, respectively). Among patients treated with the third-generation ALK TKI lorlatinib, variant 3 was associated with a significantly longer progression-free survival than variant 1 (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.79; P = .011). Conclusion Specific ALK variants may be associated with the development of ALK resistance mutations, particularly G1202R, and provide a molecular link between variant and clinical outcome. ALK variant thus represents a potentially important factor in the selection of next-generation ALK inhibitors.

Purpose The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) produced an evidence-based guideline on external-beam radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of its relevance to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) membership, ASCO endorsed the guideline after applying a set of procedures and a policy that are used to critically examine and endorse guidelines developed by other guideline development organizations. Methods The ASTRO guideline was reviewed by ASCO content experts for clinical accuracy and by ASCO methodologists for developmental rigor. On favorable review, an ASCO expert panel was convened and endorsed the guideline. The ASCO guideline approval body, the Clinical Practice Guideline Committee, approved the final endorsement. Results The recommendations from the ASTRO guideline, published in Practical Radiation Oncology, are clear, thorough, and based on the most relevant scientific evidence. The ASCO Endorsement Panel endorsed the guideline and added qualifying statements. Recommendations For curative-intent treatment of locally advanced NSCLC, concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves local control and overall survival compared with sequential chemotherapy followed by radiation. The standard dose-fractionation of radiation is 60 Gy given in 2-Gy once-daily fractions over 6 weeks. There is no role for the routine use of induction therapy before chemoradiotherapy. Current data fail to support a clear role for consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy; however, consolidation therapy remains an option for patients who did not receive full systemic chemotherapy doses during radiotherapy. Important questions remain about the ideal concurrent chemotherapy regimen and optimal management of patients with resectable stage III disease.

Cervical cancer epitomizes the success of cancer prevention through the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, but significant challenges remain in the treatment of advanced disease. We report the first three cases of cervical carcinoma harboring an FGFR3–TACC3 fusion, which serves as a novel therapeutic target. The fusion, identified by comprehensive genomic profiling, activates the FGFR pathway that has been implicated in HPV-driven carcinogenesis. One of the patients whose tumor contained the FGFR3–TACC3 fusion was treated with an investigational FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Concomitant molecular alterations involving the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAF/MEK pathways were also identified and suggest other treatment strategies that deserve investigation. This case series highlights the role of comprehensive genomic profiling in the identification of new therapeutic targets and in targeted therapy selection for patients with cervical cancer., Highlights • The first cases of cervical carcinoma harboring an FGFR3–TACC3 fusion • One of patients whose tumor contained the FGFR3–TACC3 fusion received an investigational FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor • Manuscript highlights the role of genomic profiling identifying new therapeutic targets and targeted therapies

Objectives The REVEL study demonstrated improved efficacy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with ramucirumab plus docetaxel, independent of histology. This exploratory analysis characterized the treatment effect in REVEL patients who were refractory to prior first-line treatment. Materials and methods Refractory patients had a best response of progressive disease to first-line treatment. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life (QoL), and safety. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed for OS and PFS, and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used for response. QoL was assessed with the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale. Sensitivity analyses were performed on subgroups of the intent-to-treat population with limited time on first-line therapy. Results Of 1253 randomized patients in REVEL, 360 (29%) were refractory to first-line treatment. Baseline characteristics were largely balanced between treatment arms. In the control arm, median OS for refractory patients was 6.3 versus 10.3 months for patients not meeting this criterion, demonstrating the poor prognosis of refractory patients. Median OS (8.3 vs. 6.3 months; HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.68–1.08), median PFS (4.0 vs. 2.5 months; HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57–0.88), and ORR (22.5% vs. 12.6%) were improved in refractory patients treated with ramucirumab compared to placebo, without new safety concerns or further deteriorating patient QoL. Conclusions The effect of ramucirumab in refractory patients is similar to that in the intent-to-treat population. The benefit/risk profile for refractory patients suggests that ramucirumab plus docetaxel is an appropriate treatment option even in this difficult-to-treat population.

Purpose BIRCH was designed to examine the efficacy of atezolizumab, a humanized anti–programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody, in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) across lines of therapy. Patients were selected on the basis of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (TC) or tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC). Patients and Methods Eligible patients had advanced-stage NSCLC, no CNS metastases, and zero to two or more lines of prior chemotherapy. Patients whose tumors expressed PD-L1 using the SP142 immunohistochemistry assay on ≥ 5% of TC or IC (TC2/3 or IC2/3 [TC or IC ≥ 5% PD-L1–expressing cells, respectively]) were enrolled. Atezolizumab 1,200 mg was administered intravenously every 3 weeks. Efficacy-evaluable patients (N = 659) comprised three cohorts: first line (cohort 1; n = 139); second line (cohort 2; n = 268); and third line or higher (cohort 3; n = 252). The primary end point was independent review facility–assessed objective response rate (ORR; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1). Secondary end points included median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Results BIRCH met its primary objective of demonstrating a significant ORR versus historical controls. With a minimum of 12 months of follow-up, the independent review facility–assessed ORR was 18% to 22% for the three cohorts, and 26% to 31% for the TC3 or IC3 subgroup; most responses are ongoing. Responses occurred regardless of EGFR or KRAS mutation status. The median OS from an updated survival analysis (minimum of 20 month follow up) for cohort 1 was 23.5 months (26.9 months for TC3 or IC3 patients); the median OS in cohorts 2 and 3 was 15.5 and 13.2 months, respectively. The safety profile was similar across cohorts and consistent with previous atezolizumab monotherapy trials. Conclusion BIRCH demonstrated responses with atezolizumab monotherapy in patients with PD-L1–selected advanced NSCLC, with good tolerability. PD-L1 status may serve as a predictive biomarker for identifying patients most likely to benefit from atezolizumab.

Over the last decade, new cytotoxic treatments and targeted therapies have altered treatment paradigms for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to analyze the impact of histology and biomarker selection criteria on outcomes of clinical trials in metastatic NSCLC reported over the last decade at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting. Data were collected from ASCO abstracts of Phase II–IV clinical trials for patients with metastatic NSCLC from 2004–2014. 770 of 2,989 identified metastatic NSCLC category abstracts met selection criteria. Despite a decline in the number of abstracts from 107 to 46 abstracts annually over this period, the proportion of trials with positive progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes has increased significantly. Trials with histology selection (6%) or molecular biomarker (15%) criteria were more likely to result in an improvement in PFS than those without selection criteria (21% vs. 8%, p = 0.0001 and 31% vs. 10%, p

Background Platinum chemotherapy (carboplatin or cisplatin) + etoposide is the current 1L standard of care treatment (tx) for ES-SCLC. Despite high response rates on this regimen, patient (pt) outcomes remain poor. IMpower133 is a Ph1/3, double-blind, randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial that is evaluating the efficacy and safety of adding PD-L1-inhibitor atezo or PBO to 1L tx for ES-SCLC (NCT02763579). Methods IMpower133 enrolled pts without prior tx for ES-SCLC; PD-L1 testing was not required. Pts were randomized 1:1 to four 21-day cycles of carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/mL/min IV, Day 1) + etoposide (100 mg/m2 IV, Days 1-3) with either atezo (1200 mg IV, Day 1) or PBO, then maintenance atezo or PBO until PD, unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit. Maintenance prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was allowed per protocol, while definitive thoracic radiation (TR) was not. Coprimary endpoints were OS and investigator-assessed PFS. A key exploratory endpoint was outcomes by blood tumor mutation burden (bTMB) analyzed at prespecified cutoffs (≥ 16 vs < 16 and ≥ 10 vs < 10 mutations/Mb). Results Adding atezo to carboplatin + etoposide demonstrated significant improvement in efficacy (OS and PFS) in 1L ES-SCLC (Table). Survival benefits were consistent across key subgroups and prespecified bTMB cutoffs. 44 pts (22 in each arm [per ITT]) received PCI, and 7 (3 in atezo arm, 4 in PBO arm) received TR. Gr 3-4 tx-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 57% of atezo pts vs 56% of PBO pts; serious tx-related AEs occurred in 23% vs 19%. Occurrence of CNS-related AEs in pts who had PCI are shown in the Table. Conclusion Adding atezo to carboplatin + etoposide resulted in a significant improvement in survival in this 1L ES-SCLC all-comers population. There were no new safety signals, including in pts who received PCI or TR. Atezo + carboplatin + etoposide may represent a new standard regimen for untreated ES-SCLC. Atezo + carboplatin + etoposiden = 201PBO + carboplatin + etoposiden = 202Co-primary endpointsMedian OS, mo12.310.3HR 0.70 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.91); P = 0.0069Median PFS, mo5.24.3HR 0.77 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.96) P = 0.017Secondary efficacy endpointsInvestigator-assessed confirmed ORR, %60.264.4Median DoR, mo4.23.9CNS-related AEs in pts who had PCI, n (%)a,bn = 23n = 21Headache8 (34.8)4 (19.0)Asthenia5 (21.7)2 (9.5)Dizziness2 (8.7)0Insomnia2 (8.7)1 (4.8)Fall2 (8.7)1 (4.8)aSafety population; safety analyses conducted according to tx received (1 pt randomized to the control arm received a dose of atezo).bIncludes AEs occurring in ≥ 2 patients. Citation Format: Aaron S. Mansfield, Stephen V. Liu, Aleksandra Szczęsna, Libor Havel, Maciej Kzrakowski, Maximilian J. Hochmair, Florian Huemer, György Losonczy, Melissa L. Johnson, Makoto Nishio, Martin Reck, Tony S. Mok, Sivuonthanh Lam, David S. Shames, Juan Liu, Fairooz Kabbinavar, Alan Sandler, Leora Horn. IMpower133: Primary efficacy and safety + CNS-related adverse events in a Ph1/3 study of first-line (1L) atezolizumab (atezo) + carboplatin + etoposide in extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT199.

Background: Adavosertib is a highly selective inhibitor of Wee1, a crucial regulator of intra-S and G2/M cell cycle checkpoints. This Phase Ib study (NCT02610075) investigated dosing and schedule for adavosertib monotherapy and determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Pts received adavosertib orally once (QD) or twice daily (BID) on a 5/9 schedule (5 days on treatment followed by 9 days off) in 14-day cycles, or one of two 5/2 dosing schedules (5 days on followed by 2 days off; weekly or 2 out of 3 weeks) in 21-day cycles. MTD was determined using a 3+3 dose-escalation cohort design. DLTs were defined as toxicities related to adavosertib, occurring during the first cycle. PK and biomarker analyses were performed on blood samples. Pts’ response to treatment was assessed using RECIST v1.1. Results: 62 pts (female, 64.5%; median age, 61.5 years; most common primary tumor sites: lung [24.2%] and ovary [21.0%]) received treatment (QD schedule, n=50; BID schedule, n=12) (Table 1). Median treatment duration was 1.77 months. Adavosertib was steadily absorbed (median time to max concentration: 2.0-4.15 h) and slowly eliminated (mean half-life: 5-12 h). AEs leading to dose reductions, interruptions and discontinuations were reported by 17 (27.4%), 25 (40.3%) and 4 (6.5%) pts, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 AEs were anemia, neutropenia (both n=9, 14.5%) and diarrhea (n=8, 12.9%). The overall response rate was 3.4% (n=2 [thymoma; anal]), disease control rate 48.4% (n=30) and median progression-free survival 2.7 months. Circulating-tumor-derived DNA pharmacodynamic analyses will be presented. Conclusions: The MTD was determined to be 125 mg (BID 5/9) and 300 mg (QD 5/2 and 5/9) for 2/3 weeks, with 300 mg (QD 5/2) being the RP2D. The safety/tolerability profile was considered acceptable. Adavosertib monotherapy showed preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in a heavily pretreated patient population. Table 1CohortAdavosertib dose (schedule)N evaluableAny AE Grade ≥3, n (%)DLTs, n (%)DLTs:* AE preferred term/CTCAE gradeBID 1125 mg (5/9)64 (66.7)0–BID 2150 mg (5/9)65 (83.3)2 (33.3)Diarrhea/3 and nausea/2 Dehydration/3QD 1.1200 mg (5/9)51 (20.0)0–QD 1.2200 mg (5/2)53 (50.0)0–QD 2.1250 mg (5/9)42 (50.0)0–QD 2.2250 mg (5/2)33 (100.0)0–QD 2.3250 mg (5/2 weekly)95 (50.0)2 (22.2)Thrombocytopenia/3 and neutropenia/3 Thrombocytopenia/2QD 3.1300 mg (5/9)43 (75.0)0–QD 3.2300 mg (5/2)1512 (75.0)2 (13.3)Nausea/2 and weight decreased/1 Pneumonia/3QD 3.3300 mg (5/2 weekly)21 (50.0)2 (100.0)Thrombocytopenia/4 Nausea/2 and vomiting/2Total5939 (62.9)8125/2: doses given on days 1–5 and 8–12 per 21-day cycle; 5/2 weekly schedule: doses given on days 1–5, 8–12 and 15–19 per 21-day cycle; 5/9: doses given on days 1–5 per 14-day cycle. *Some patients experienced >1 DLT. CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; DLT, dose-limiting toxicity Citation Format: Gerald S. Falchook, Jasgit Sachdev, Esteban Rodrigo Imedio, Sanjeev Kumar, Ganesh Mugundu, Juliann Chmielecki, Suzanne Jones, David R. Spigel, Melissa Johnson. A Phase Ib study of Wee1 inhibitor adavosertib in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT022.

Introduction: There is a high unmet medical need for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have failed platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors. Only 10% of such patients receive any benefit from current therapies, and novel therapies are needed to improve outcomes. Preclinical data support the efficacy, specificity and possible safety of NYESO1/LAGE1a T-cell receptor-engineered patient Tcells (GSK3377794) in NSCLC. Pembrolizumab (PEM) is a monoclonal antibody, which specifically blocks PD1/PDL1 interaction, thereby increasing the antitumor function of Tcells. Thus, the combination of GSK3377794 and PEM may work synergistically due to the inhibition of PD1/PD-L1 signaling on GSK3377794 and other T-cells, potentially further improving the therapeutic effect. Methods: This is a Phase Ib/IIa randomized, multiarm, openlabel pilot study (NCT03709706) in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)A*02:01, HLAA*02:05 and/or HLAA*02:06 adult patients (aged >18 years) whose tumors express NYESO1 and/or LAGE1a. This study aims to enroll up to 44 patients with unresectable Stage IIIb or Stage IV NSCLC who were either ineligible for definitive chemoradiotherapy, have recurrent disease which has progressed during or after platinumbased chemotherapy with or without anti-PD-1 agents, have terminated prior treatment due to intolerable side effects, or have refused standard approved treatment. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to two treatment arms. Arm A will receive GSK3377794 as monotherapy, administered as a single intravenous (IV) infusion; Arm B will receive GSK3377794 as a single IV infusion on Day 1 followed by PEM 200 mg initiated on Day 22 and continued for up to 35 cycles or until disease progression. Patients in Arm A who progress after receiving GSK3377794 monotherapy will be offered antiPD1 therapy at the same dose and duration as Arm B. The study will use a Bayesian adaptive design, wherein enrollment can be halted in either arm for futility. The patient journey will consist of 3 parts: patients will undergo eligibility screening (Part 1), followed by leukapheresis (Part 2), after which patients will enter the Interventional Phase (Part 3) during which patients will receive preparative lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by infusion of GSK3377794. The first patient was screened on December 31, 2018. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03709706 Study is funded by GlaxoSmithKline and is in collaboration with Merck & Co., Inc. Citation Format: Karen L. Reckamp, Wallace Akerley, Martin J. Edelman, Balazs Halmos, Kai He, Melissa Johnson, Raja Mudad, Joel W. Neal, Taofeek K. Owonikoko, Jyoti D. Patel, Sandip P. Patel, Jonathan W. Riess, Adrian G. Sacher, Simon Turcotte, Liza C. Villaruz, Marjorie G. Zauderer, Benedetto Farsaci, Aisha Hasan, Roma Patel, Yuehui Wu, Michael Chisamore, Vincent Lam. A Phase Ib/IIa randomized pilot study to investigate the safety and tolerability of autologous T-cells with enhanced T-cell receptors specific to NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a (GSK3377794) alone, or in combination with pembrolizumab, in advanced non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT225.

Background: Inhibitors of programmed death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) have improved outcomes in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma, but treatment options for pts who progress on or after these therapies remain limited. In this group, we previously reported preliminary data that ENT, a class I selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, in combination with PEMBRO showed promising activity, through alteration of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Here we report the full cohort of patients enrolled. Methods: ENCORE-601 is an open-label study evaluating ENT (5 mg PO weekly) + PEMBRO (200 mg IV Q3W) in pts with unresectable or metastatic melanoma who were previously treated with a PD-1-blocking antibody and experienced progression on or after therapy. A Simon 2-stage design was utilized (Stage 1: 13 patients, Stage 2: 40 patients) and the primary endpoint was ORR as assessed by irRECIST. Tumor biopsies and blood samples for immune correlates were obtained pre- and on-treatment. Results: 53 patients were enrolled (the last patient entered April 2018, data cutoff is January 2018). The median duration of prior PD-1 therapy was 4.9 months and median time from last dose to study entry was 2.7 months (66% of patients had no intervening therapy between their prior PD-1 therapy and study enrollment). Additional baseline demographics are as follows: 55% were ECOG 0, 36% had elevated LDH, 70% pts had prior ipilimumab, and 23% had prior BRAF/MEK inhibitors. The confirmed objective response with ENT + PEMBRO is 19% (1 CR and 9 PRs; 95% CI: 9-32%); these results exceed the threshold for success based on the prespecified design. The median duration of response as of the cut-off date is 12.5 months (range 4-18 months) with 5 responders ongoing at the time of data cutoff. An additional 7 patients have had stable disease for > 6 months, resulting in a clinical benefit rate (CR, PR, SD > 6 months) of 32% (95% CI: 20%-46%). The median PFS is 4.2 months. Efficacy results in patients who received prior ipilimumab were consistent with the overall population. Among the responders, best response on prior PD-1 therapy were as follows: progression- 3 pts, stable disease- 5 pts, partial response- 1 pt, unknown- 1 pt. Grade 3/4 related AEs occurring in >5% of patients included neutropenia, fatigue, and hyponatraemia. 5 patients (9%) experienced a Grade 3/4 immune-related AE (2 events of rash, 1 each of colitis, pneumonitis, and autoimmune hepatitis). Additional correlative analyses to identify biomarkers of response, including whole exome sequencing and RNAseq, are in progress. Conclusions: In patients with melanoma who have progressed following treatment with prior PD-1 blockade, and both prior PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade, ENT plus PEMBRO demonstrates significant clinical activity and acceptable safety. Citation Format: Ryan J. Sullivan, Stergios J. Moschos, Melissa L. Johnson, Mateusz Opyrchal, Peter Ordentlich, Susan Brouwer, Serap Sankoh, Michael L. Meyers, Sanjiv S. Agarwala. Efficacy and safety of entinostat (ENT) and pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) in patients with melanoma previously treated with anti-PD1 therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT072.

Background: Despite recent success with checkpoint inhibitors, the majority of patients with M or NSCLC have a transient response or no response to checkpoint blockade. Preclinical data suggest that activation of CD40 can be combined with PD-1 blockade to trigger effective T cell immunity. We are conducting a multi-center, open label Phase Ib/II clinical trial to evaluate the combination of APX005M with nivo in subjects with M or NSCLC. We report safety and efficacy from the completed Phase Ib portion of the study and the 1st stage of the Phase II M cohort. Methods: Phase Ib followed a 3+3 design and enrolled adult subjects with M and disease progression (PD) while receiving anti-PD-1 therapy (anti-CTLA-4 more than 3 months prior to study entry was allowed) and subjects with immunotherapy naïve NSCLC, in 3 dose levels of APX005M (0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg) combined with a fixed dose of nivo (360mg) every 3 weeks. Primary objectives in Phase Ib were to evaluate safety and determine the Phase II dose (P2D) of APX005M. Phase II is enrolling subjects with M or NSCLC in two parallel Phase II cohorts, each following a Simon 2-stage design. Primary objective in Phase II is to evaluate the tumor response in each cohort. Phase Ib analyses were performed on dose limiting toxicity (DLT)-evaluable subjects. Phase II analyses were performed on all treated subjects. Results: Phase Ib: No DLTs were observed in the 9 subjects enrolled in Phase Ib and the P2D for APX005M is 0.3 mg/kg. Four subjects experienced Grade 3 AEs considered related to study drugs (non-DLTs, including transaminitis, hyperbilirubinemia, anemia, pneumonitis, 1 subject each) with no grade 4 AEs reported. Of the 5 subjects with M, 1 had a confirmed PR, 2 had prolonged SD (>8 months) and 2 had PD as best overall response. Of the 4 subjects with NSCLC, 1 had a robust confirmed PR, 2 had SD (on study lesion biopsies histology negative) and 1 had PD as best overall response. Phase II: The 1st stage of the M cohort enrolled 10 additional subjects. One subject experienced a Grade 3 AE considered related to study drugs with no grade 4 AEs reported. Of these 10 subjects, 2 had confirmed PR, 2 had SD, and 6 had PD as best overall response. The overall toxicity profile of the combination is consistent with the profiles of individual agents. NanoString analysis of paired tumor biopsies revealed high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and increased expression of IFNγ inducible cytokines (CXCL9 and CXCL10) while on treatment. Increased tumor T cell infiltration was further confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Conclusions: APX005M + nivo demonstrated a good safety profile and promising antitumor activity in M subjects with PD while receiving anti-PD-1 therapy and potential activity in NSCLC. The study is currently enrolling subjects in the 2nd stage of the Phase II M cohort and the 1st stage of the Phase II NSCLC cohort. Clinical trial information: NCT03123783. Citation Format: Harriet Kluger, Sarah A. Weiss, Anthony J. Olszanski, Lynn Schuchter, Gerald P. Linette, Linda Garland, Nicholas O. Iannotti, Melissa Johnson, Emin Avsar, Minu K. Srivastava, Ovid C. Trifan, Martin J. Edelman. Phase Ib/II of CD40 agonistic antibody APX005M in combination with nivolumab (nivo) in subjects with metastatic melanoma (M) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT089.

Background and Objectives: DV281 is a synthetic CpG-ODN agonist of TLR9 that stimulates dendritic cells to release IFN-alpha and mature into antigen presenting cells to activate T cell anti-tumor responses. Nivolumab is a PD-1 inhibitor that has demonstrated activity in advanced/metastatic NSCLC. Study DV9- NSC-01 (NCT03326752) is a phase 1b/2 study to assess safety and pharmacodynamic activity of DV281 in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC and to determine the recommended dose for expansion. Methods: Anti-PD-1/L1 experienced or naïve patients were enrolled in 2L or 3L NSCLC in the escalation phase, 3+3 design: 5 dose cohorts, with intra-patient dose escalation between the first 2 monotherapy doses: cohort 1: 1 mg; cohort 2: 1 to 3 mg; cohort 3: 3 to 10 mg; cohort 4: 10 to 15 mg; cohort 5: 15 to 25 mg. Nivolumab was administered at 240 mg Q2w. Safety was primary objective and pharmacodynamic effects including IFN-inducible gene expression were key secondary objective. DV281 is administered via inhalation, first alone, weekly for 2 doses, then 6 doses weekly with nivolumab, followed by a 5 week off period of DV281, while continuing nivolumab, then DV281 with intravenous nivolumab Q2w for an additional 24 weeks. Preliminary Results from the Escalation phase: 22 patients have been enrolled to date: Cohort (C) 1: 4 patients; C 2: 3 pts; C3: 7 pts; C 4: 7 pts; C 5: 1pt, ongoing. Median age 67 y/o; male 50%; all ECOG PS0-1 (27.3/72.7%); non squamous 15 (68%), squamous 7 (32%); locally advanced 4 (18%), metastatic 18 (82%); PD-L1 expression: positive 12 pts (52%), negative 10 pts (48%); prior lines of therapy - 1 line: 10 pts (45.5%), 2 lines:12 (54.5%). Previous treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: 18 pts (9 as single agent, 9 in combination). Median treatment duration 11.5 weeks (1 to 38). Eighteen patients discontinued DV281: adverse event 2, PD 14, other 2. Safety profile of DV281 alone and combined with nivolumab with a median number of 5 doses (1.0 to 18.0): grade 1/ 2 chills (18%), fatigue (13.6%), flu-like symptoms (4.5%), diarrhea (13.6%) and rash (13.6%); no grade ≥3 DV281/nivolumab treatment related AE; no immune-related AEs. Pharmacodynamic (PD) assessment (IFN-induced genes) shows target engagement in all dose cohorts, with every patient showing evidence of target engagement in cohorts 3 and 4. A dose dependent increase in PD activity appears to begin to plateau at the 15 mg dose. Conclusions: In this population of heavily pretreated patients, DV281 in monotherapy and in combination with nivolumab was well tolerated. Target engagement was observed at all dose levels. The expansion phase will use a modified dosing schedule, evaluating several groups of patients: non squamous resistant to PD-1/PD-L1 or to EGFR inhibitors; squamous experienced or naïve to anti PD-1/PD-L1. Citation Format: Edward Garon, Alexander I. Spira, Melissa Johnson, Lyudmila Bazhenova, Joseph Leach, Albert Candia, Robert Coffman, Mary Janatpour, Erick Gamelin, Robert Janssen, Laura Q. Chow. Phase Ib/II, open label, multicenter study of inhaled DV281, a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist, in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced or metastatic non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT224.

Introduction: PF-06801591 is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds to programmed cell death (PD-1) receptor, blocking its interaction with PD-1 ligands. In a phase I study (NCT02573259; dose-escalation) of 40 patients (pts) with multiple solid tumor types treated with PF-06891591 intravenously (IV) or subcutaneously (SC), 7 pts showed partial response. PF-06801591 was well tolerated at all doses. Biopsy samples were evaluated for predictive biomarkers and pharmacodynamic effects. Methods: Biopsy samples at baseline and on-treatment (IV:day 29; SC:day 36) were collected from 4 dose cohorts (IV:1, 3 and 10 mg/kg; SC:300 mg). Whole-exome sequencing (WES) and RNA-seq of biopsy tissue were used to estimate tumor mutation burden (TMB) and gene expression. Regression analysis was used to identify TMB/genes/pathways potentially associated with response in baseline tissue. Differential analysis of baseline and on-treatment biopsies identified genes/pathways potentially upregulated by PF-06801591. PD-L1 (clone SP-263; Ventana) expression was evaluated in tumor biopsies by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and pathologist scoring. Results: In a combined WES analysis of samples from baseline biopsies (all doses, n=24 pts), higher TMB was significantly associated with improved objective response (R^2=0.215, P=0.013). From RNA-seq analysis, genes positively associated with response were involved in interferon-gamma (IFNG) and PD-1 signaling, and cell cycle; CTLA4 was among the genes most significantly associated with response (P Conclusion: Based on a mixed set of tumor types with possible sensitivity to anti-PD-1, high TMB, IFNG signaling, and PD-L1 were associated with response to PF-06801591, as reported for other anti-PD-1 antibodies. Albeit based on a small sample size and diverse indication profile, baseline expression of CTLA4 appears to be highly associated with response and PD-L1 RNA levels may be better associated with response than protein expression by IHC. Increased expression of genes/pathways associated with adaptive immune activation in on-treatment biopsies indicates an active, immunomodulatory mechanism with anti-PD-1 therapy. This ongoing study will evaluate predictive biomarkers in dose-expansion cohorts of PF-06801591 in non-small cell lung cancer and urothelial cancer. Acknowledgments Study sponsor: Pfizer. Medical writing support: Chu Kong Liew (Engage Scientific Solutions), funded by Pfizer. Citation Format: Siwen Hu-Lieskovan, Fadi Braiteh, Juneko E. Grilley-Olson, Shobha Potluri, Xiao Wang, Alison Forgie, Vinicius Bonato, Jeffrey Chou, Melissa L. Johnson. Predictive biomarkers and pharmacodynamic changes in tumor RNA expression in a phase I study of anti PD-1 monoclonal antibody PF-06801591 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT046.

Importance We assessed feasibility of monthly subcutaneous administration of PF-06801591, a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody that binds to the programmed cell death (PD-1) receptor and blocks its interaction with PD-1 ligands. Objective To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of PF-06801591 administered intravenously vs subcutaneously. Design, Setting, and Participants Ongoing phase 1, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation study of 40 patients, 18 years or older, with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, enrolled between March 8, 2016, and March 5, 2018, from 4 US medical centers. Interventions An intravenous dose of 0.5, 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg of PF-06801591 was administered every 3 weeks or a subcutaneous dose of 300 mg was administered every 4 weeks. Dose escalation occurred after 2 to 4 patients were enrolled per dose level, with additional patients enrolled in each cohort for further assessment. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end points were dose-limiting toxic effects and safety. Secondary end points included pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, PD-1 receptor occupancy, and efficacy. Results Of 40 enrolled patients (12 men and 28 women; mean [SD] age, 61 [13] years) in this phase 1 dose-escalation trial, 25 received PF-06801591 intravenously at escalating dose levels (0.5, 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg) and 15 patients received the monoclonal antibody subcutaneously at a single dose level. No dose-limiting toxic effects were observed. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 4 (16%) patients treated intravenously and 1 (6.7%) patient treated subcutaneously. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 10 (40%) patients treated intravenously and 3 (20%) treated subcutaneously. No dose–adverse event associations were observed during intravenous dose escalation, and no serious skin toxic effects occurred with subcutaneous delivery. Responses were seen in 5 patients receiving PF-06801591 intravenously and in 2 patients treated subcutaneously for an overall objective response rate of 18.4%. Median overall survival was not reached with intravenous dosing vs 10.7 months with subcutaneous administration. Exposure to PF-06801591 increased in a dose-proportional manner over the range of intravenous doses. Median time to maximum observed serum concentration was 8 days after subcutaneous administration. Full PD-1 receptor occupancy was seen in all dose cohorts. Conclusions and Relevance Anti–PD-1 antibody PF-06801591 was tolerable and showed antitumor activity in a variety of tumor types across all dose levels of intravenous and subcutaneous administration. Monthly subcutaneous administration of PF-06801591 offers a convenient, effective alternative to currently available intravenously administered checkpoint inhibitors. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02573259

3091 Background: Prexasertib inhibits CHK1, a kinase involved in DNA repair and replication. LY3023414 inhibits PI3K/mTOR signaling, implicated in the development of malignant disease. Prexasertib + LY3023414 has resulted in enhanced antitumor activity in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) in vitro models. Methods: This Phase 1b study in patients (pts) with solid tumors assessed escalating doses of prexasertib (60-105 mg/m2 IV every 14 days [q14d]) and LY3023414 (100-200 mg orally twice daily [BID]). Dose escalation ceased once the maximum tolerated dose of each monotherapy was reached. An initial expansion cohort (Arm E) explored prexasertib 105 mg/m2 q14d + LY3023414 200 mg BID. Subsequent expansion cohorts evaluated prexasertib 105 mg/m2 q14d + LY3023414 150 mg BID in pts with solid tumors with PIK3CA mutations (Arm E2) or TNBC (Arm E3). Results: Fifty pts were enrolled (escalation: n = 13; Arm E: n = 9; Arm E2: n = 15; Arm E3: n = 13). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed during escalation however DLT-equivalent toxicities were observed in 2 pts in Arm E (anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, oral mucositis, abdominal pain, fatigue). Due to toxicity, a reduced dose of LY3023414 (150 mg BID) was assessed in Arm E2/E3. In the 28 patients treated in Arms E2/E3, common treatment-related adverse events (any grade; grade ≥3) were: leukopenia/neutropenia (82%; 79%), thrombocytopenia (46%; 36%), nausea (46%; 0%), stomatitis (39%, 4%), vomiting (36%; 0%), and anemia (29%; 18%). Febrile neutropenia was reported in 25% of pts. Dose reductions in Arm E2/E3 were common. In escalation, 2 pts achieved a partial response (PR) and 3 pts achieved stable disease (SD). In Arm E, 78% of pts achieved SD. Of the pts evaluable at the time of data transfer, PRs were achieved in 1 pt with an unknown primary (Arm E2) and 2 pts with TNBC (Arm E3). Each agent’s pharmacokinetic profile was consistent with prior monotherapy data. Conclusions: Prexasertib + LY3023414 showed preliminary efficacy in heavily pretreated pts with solid tumors but was associated with toxicity, suggesting supportive care may be required. Clinical trial information: NCT02124148.

3098 Background: Aurora kinase B (AURKB) represents a potential target for therapy in solid and hematological malignancies. AURKB inhibitor AZD1152 (barasertib) was previously investigated in solid tumor pts in a phase I setting. AZD2811-nanoparticle (np) is a novel, encapsulated slow release AURKB inhibitor offering several advantages over AZD1152 (Ashton S et al., Sci Transl Med 2016). We report the completed dose-escalation safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), preliminary activity and defined maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AZD2811-np in pts with advanced solid tumors (NCT02579226). Methods: Adult pts with advanced solid tumors received AZD2811-np IV on Day 1 (D1) and 4 (D4) Q4 week (wk) in six cohorts 15-200 mg/infusion without the use of g-csf in cycle 1. D1 Q4wk and Q3wk schedules were investigated up to 600 mg/infusion (including cohorts with mandatory g-csf prophylaxis on day 8). A standard 3+3 design was used. PK was assessed in cycle 1. Results: 50 pts were recruited into 12 cohorts. D1, D4 Q4wk schedule: 24 pts (15, 25,38, 50, 100 mg/infusion (n=3/cohort), 200 mg/infusion (n=9)). All cohorts were tolerated. Transient grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 7/9 pts at 200 mg/infusion, including 1 DLT (gr4 > 7 days) D1 Q4wk: 200 mg(n=3) was tolerated. D1 Q3wk: 23 pts were evaluated (200/400 mg (n=3,7), and 400/600/500 mg with mandatory g-csf (n=3/5/6)). 400 mg without g-csf was not tolerated (1 gr3 mucosal inflammation & 1 gr4 neutropenia > 7 days). 600 mg with g-csf was not tolerated (gr3 febrile neutropenia & gr3 fatigue). 25/50 pts experienced AE ≥gr 3 (21 considered AZD2811-np-related, 19 neutropenia-related, no deaths within-DLT period). AZD2811-np caused transient gr1/2 fatigue, nausea, diarrhoea and mucosal inflammation. AZD2811 total blood PK appears dose proportional with a t1/2 of 30-50 hours irrespective of schedule. Released AZD2811 concentrations ~1% of total. 14 pts (28%) had disease stabilisation. 1 prostate ca. pt had a confirmed partial response (PR) (continued tx to 451 days). Conclusions: The MTD for AZD2811-np is 500 mg D1 Q3wk. AZD2811-np is now being investigated in a small cell lung cancer expansion. Clinical trial information: NCT02579226.

8516 Background: Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T™) is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting DLL3, a Notch ligand expressed in SCLC but not normal tissue. Nivo ± Ipi has activity in 2L+ SCLC. Preliminary data suggest Rova-T may result in immunogenic cell death, complementing effects of Nivo ± Ipi. Methods: Eligibility: DLL3 expression (DLT phase only), progression after ≥1 line of therapy including a platinum-based regimen; ECOG 0-1; no prior immunotherapy. All pts received 0.3 mg/kg Rova-T IV on Day 1 of two 6-wk cycles. Cohort 1 (C1) also received two 3-wk cycles of 360 mg Nivo beginning on wk 4. Cohort 2 (C2) received four 3-wk cycles of 1 mg/kg Nivo and 1 mg/kg Ipi beginning on wk 4. Both cohorts then received 480 mg Nivo q4wks until PD. Primary objective: safety. Secondary: antitumor activity by RECISTv1.1, OS. Exploratory: PK. Results: As of Sep 7, 2018, 30 pts were dosed in C1 and 12 in C2. 55% were DLL3 high (≥75% DLL3 expression). 28 (67%) completed 2 planned cycles of Rova-T. 4 pts (1 in C1, 3 in C2) experienced DLTs including rash (3), pneumonitis (1) and colitis (1). C1 completed recruitment, and C2 enrollment was stopped after DLT evaluation phase. Preliminary PK showed Nivo±Ipi had no substantial effect on Rova-T exposure. Clinical trial information: NCT03026166. Conclusions: Despite activity in 2L+ ED-SCLC, Rova-T with Nivo/Ipi is not appropriate due to DLTs. Rova-T/Nivo demonstrated some durable responses; however, the safety data suggest that optimization of dose and schedule is warranted. NCT03026166.[Table: see text]

9093 Background: The immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of JNJ-757, a live attenuated, double-deleted Listeria monocytogenes-based immunotherapy expressing human mesothelin (MSLN), were evaluated in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC (adenocarcinoma) as monotherapy (phase 1) and in combination with nivolumab (phase 1b/2). Methods: Adult pts with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who had received prior systemic therapy (including 1 platinum-based chemotherapy, prior PD-1/PD-L1 therapy allowed) were included. Dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events (AEs), tumor response, T cell response, and JNJ-757 bacterial shedding profile were evaluated in pts treated with JNJ-757 (108 or 109 colony forming units [CFU]) alone or JNJ-757 (109 CFU)+nivolumab 240 mg combination therapy until progression. Results: In the monotherapy trial, 18 pts (median age 63.5 years; women 61%) were treated with JNJ-757 108 or 109 CFU with a median duration of 1.4 months (range 0-29). Most common AEs were pyrexia (72%) and chills (61%), which were usually mild and resolved within 48 hours, suggesting transient activation of an innate immune response to JNJ-757. Treatment-related grade ≥3 AEs were infrequent (4 [22%]). Induction of peripheral proinflammatory cytokines and lymphocyte activation was observed post-treatment with transient MSLN-specific T cell responses in 10/13 evaluable pts, consistent with the mechanism of action of JNJ-757. With monotherapy, 4/18 response-evaluable pts had stable disease (SD) ≥16 weeks, including 1 pt with a 53% reduction in target lesions. In the combination therapy study, 12 pts were enrolled (median age 63.5 years; women 33%). The most common AEs were pyrexia (67%) and chills (58%); 6 pts had grade ≥3 AEs including 2 cases of treatment-related fatal pneumonitis. Best overall response for the combination was SD in 4/9 evaluable pts. JNJ-757 in combination with nivolumab suggested increased risk of pneumonitis. Conclusions: As monotherapy, JNJ-757 was tolerable with mild infusion-related fever and chills supporting the initiation of the combination therapy study. However, the risk-benefit profile of JNJ-757+nivolumab, did not support proceeding to phase 2. Clinical trial information: NCT02592967, NCT03371381.

TPS3161 Background: RAS proteins are part of the family of small GTPases which regulate intracellular signaling pathways responsible for cell growth, migration, survival and differentiation. Oncogenic point mutations in RAS in codons 12, 13, and 61 occur in up to one-third of all human cancers and result in constitutive activation of RAS signaling, playing a key role in uncontrolled cellular growth and malignant transformation. Mutant KRASG12C in particular comprises approximately 14% of lung adenocarcinoma and 4% of colon adenocarcinoma, and less commonly in certain other types of cancer. For decades, KRAS was considered undruggable due to its high affinity for GTP/GDP and the lack of a clear binding pocket. Recent discoveries have enabled the development of compounds, including MRTX849, that covalently bind to KRASG12C at the cysteine at residue 12, lock the protein in its inactive GDP-bound conformation, and inhibit KRAS-dependent signal transduction. MRTX849 is a potent, orally-available, mutation-selective small molecule covalent inhibitor of KRASG12C. MRTX849 inhibits KRASG12C signaling in cell lines harboring this mutation, and results in tumor regression in a broad spectrum of KRASG12C animal models. Methods: This multi-center, Phase 1/2, multiple expansion cohort trial evaluates the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), metabolites, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of MRTX849 in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies with a KRAS (p.G12C) mutation. The study starts with an evaluation of dose and regimen of MRTX849 using a combination of the accelerated titration and modified toxicity probability interval designs, with MRTX849 initially administered once daily in a continuous regimen expressed in 3-week cycles. As potentially viable regimens are identified, Phase 1b expansion cohorts will be opened to provide greater safety and PK data for determination of the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) and regimen. In Phase 2, separate cohorts of patients by histological diagnosis, including non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal, and other solid tumors, will be enrolled and evaluated for clinical activity using a predictive probability design. The study is open for enrollment, and recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03785249.

9010 Background: Treatment options are limited for EGFRm NSCLC resistant to EGFR TKIs. HER3 is expressed in a majority of NSCLC tumors. U3-1402 is a HER3-targeted antibody drug conjugate with a fully human HER3-targeted antibody, novel cleavable peptide-based linker, and topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. Methods: An ongoing multicenter phase 1 dose escalation and expansion study is assessing U3-1402 safety/tolerability and preliminary activity in metastatic or unresectable EGFRm NSCLC patients (pts) who are T790M negative after disease progression while on erlotinib, gefitinib or afatinib; or develop disease progression while on osimertinib regardless of T790M status. Dose escalation is based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and guided by the modified Continuous Reassessment Method. U3-1402 is administered via intravenous infusion in 21-day cycles. Pretreatment tumor tissue is required. Results: As of 11 Nov 2018, 15 pts (6 M; 9 F) were enrolled across 3 dose levels (3.2, 4.8, 6.4 mg/kg). Median age was 63 y; 10 pts had EGFR exon 19 deletion and 5 EGFR L858R mutation. Median sum of longest diameters (SLD) at baseline was 69 (range 22–143) mm. All pts had prior EGFR TKIs; 14 had 2nd line or later osimertinib. Six had prior chemotherapy. All 11 evaluable tumors demonstrated HER3 expression (median HER3 membrane H-score 188, range 150–290). Five pts discontinued treatment: 4 due to progressive disease, 1 due to adverse event (AE). All Grade (Gr) treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) in ≥20% of pts were nausea (60%), vomiting (40%), fatigue (33%), decreased appetite (27%), and alopecia (20%). Gr≥3 TEAEs were nausea (1/15; Gr3; related), hypoxia (1/15; Gr3; unrelated), and platelet count decreased (2/15; both Gr4 at 6.4 mg/kg and considered DLTs). In 13 evaluable pts, all but 1 had a decrease in SLD (median best change −29%, range +10% to −67%), 2 had confirmed partial response per RECIST v1.1 (best changes −44%, −67%). Conclusions: U3-1402 showed a manageable safety profile and preliminary antitumor activity in EGFR TKI-resistant EGFRm NSCLC. Evaluation of candidate biomarkers, including HER3 expression, which correlate with U3-1402 response is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03260491.

2508 Background: We present initial safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy from the dose escalation study of R3767, alone (mono) or in combination with cemiplimab (REGN2810), a PD-1 mAb (combo), in pts with advanced malignancies (NCT03005782). Methods: Pts who had progressed on prior therapy(ies) and/or for whom no therapy with clinical benefit was available were enrolled; most pts had received no prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1. Pts received R3767 1, 3, 10, or 20 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W) ± cemiplimab 3 mg/kg or 350 mg Q3W IV for ≤51 weeks. Crossover from mono to combo was allowed at progression. R3767 PK were evaluated. Tumor measurements were performed Q6W for the first 24 weeks and subsequently Q9W. Data cut-off date was Aug 25, 2018. Results: Mono: 27 pts (median age: 66 yr; ECOG PS: 0 [n=4], 1 [n=23]) were treated. There were no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The most common treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was nausea (22.2%). Grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of increased alanine and aspartate aminotransferases (each 3.7%) were reported. By investigator-assessment (per RECIST 1.1; INV), best response was stable disease in 11 pts. Combo: 42 pts (median age: 60 yr; ECOG PS: 0 [n=15], 1 [n=27]) were treated. One pt treated with R3767 3 mg/kg Q3W + cemiplimab 3 mg/kg Q3W experienced DLT of grade 4 elevated blood creatine phosphokinase, associated with grade 3 myasthenia syndrome and grade 1 elevated troponin. The most common TEAEs were fatigue (33.3%) and nausea (21.4%). Grade 3 irAE of hypothyroidism (2.4%) was also reported. By INV, 2 (both small cell lung cancer) combo pts and 2 (endometrial cancer and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma) of 12 additional pts who crossed over from mono to combo had partial responses. PK: R3767 concentrations in serum increased in a dose-dependent manner and were unaffected by combo. Conclusions: The safety profile of R3767 ± cemiplimab was generally tolerable; PK was linear. Early efficacy signals were detected despite the difficult-to-treat pt population. Biomarker studies are ongoing. R3767 20 mg/kg or 1600 mg fixed dose equivalent Q3W as mono and combo were selected for further evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT03005782.

Purpose: The molecular epidemiology of most EGFR and KRAS mutations in lung cancer remains unclear. Experimental Design: We genotyped 3,026 lung adenocarcinomas for the major EGFR (exon 19 deletions and L858R) and KRAS (G12, G13) mutations and examined correlations with demographic, clinical, and smoking history data. Results: EGFR mutations were found in 43% of never smokers and in 11% of smokers. KRAS mutations occurred in 34% of smokers and in 6% of never smokers. In patients with smoking histories up to 10 pack-years, EGFR predominated over KRAS. Among former smokers with lung cancer, multivariate analysis showed that, independent of pack-years, increasing smoking-free years raise the likelihood of EGFR mutation. Never smokers were more likely than smokers to have KRAS G > A transition mutation (mostly G12D; 58% vs. 20%, P = 0.0001). KRAS G12C, the most common G > T transversion mutation in smokers, was more frequent in women (P = 0.007) and these women were younger than men with the same mutation (median 65 vs. 69, P = 0.0008) and had smoked less. Conclusions: The distinct types of KRAS mutations in smokers versus never smokers suggest that most KRAS-mutant lung cancers in never smokers are not due to second-hand smoke exposure. The higher frequency of KRAS G12C in women, their younger age, and lesser smoking history together support a heightened susceptibility to tobacco carcinogens. Clin Cancer Res; 18(22); 6169–77. ©2012 AACR.

Background Lung cancers account for the majority of brain metastases which pose major therapeutic challenges. Biomarkers prognosticating for the development of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) may improve personalized care. Six serum proteomic biomarkers were previously investigated at Memorial Sloan Kettering but their associations with brain metastases were unknown. Methods Serum NSE, CYFRA 21–1, ProGRP, SCC-Ag, TIMP1, and HE4 by ELISA-based proteomic assays were prospectively collected from consecutive patients with stage IV NSCLC. Pre-treatment serum biomarker levels as well as age, histology, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status were evaluated for association with the baseline presence of brain metastases using logistic regression and multivariable analysis. For patients without brain metastases at baseline, the cumulative incidence of subsequent brain metastases were compared according to baseline biomarkers and clinical factors using Gray’s test. Results A total of 118 patients were enrolled, 31 (26%; 95% CI 0.19–0.35) had brain metastases at baseline and a further 26 (22%; 95% CI 0.15–0.30) developed brain metastases subsequently. Pre-treatment serum biomarker levels were available in 104 patients. There was no significant association between the six serum biomarkers and the baseline presence or subsequent development of brain metastases. Age younger than 65 years was the only clinical factor significantly associated with brain metastasis at baseline (OR 3.00; 95% CI 1.22–7.34, P = 0.02) by multivariable analysis. A trend toward increased cumulative incidence of subsequent brain metastases was observed in patients with EGFR mutation (p = 0.2), but this was not statistically significant possibly due to small sample size. Conclusions Serum NSE, CYFRA 21–1, Pro-GRP, SCC-Ag, TIMP1, and HE4 are not significantly associated with brain metastases. Our methods taking into account follow-up time may be applied to independent datasets to identify a patient cohort with a higher biologic propensity for developing brain metastases. Such information may be useful for the study of agents targeting the development of brain metastases.

Background Lung adenocarcinomas can be distinguished by identifying mutated driver oncogenes, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS. Mutations in EGFR are associated with both improved survival as well as response to treatment with erlotinib and gefitinib. However, the prognostic significance of KRAS has not been evaluated in large numbers of patients and remains controversial. For the current report, the authors examined the association of EGFR and KRAS mutations with survival among patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas. Methods Data were analyzed from patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas who had known EGFR and KRAS mutation status evaluated between 2002 and 2009. The collected clinical variables included age, sex, Karnofsky performance status, smoking history, and treatment history. Overall survival from the diagnosis of advanced disease was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods. Results In total, 1036 patients were evaluated, including 610 women (59%) and 344 never-smokers (33%). The median patient age was 65 years (range, 25-92 years), and the majority of patients (81%) had a Karnofsky performance status ≥80%. In multivariate analysis, EGFR mutations were associated with longer overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.6; P Conclusions KRAS mutations predicted shorter survival for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas. The presence of EGFR and KRAS mutations define distinct subsets of patients with lung adenocarcinomas and should be determined in patients when they are diagnosed with advanced disease. Clinical trial reports should include EGFR and KRAS mutation status along with other prognostic factors.