151. The effect of body position on cardiovascular, skeletal muscle and ventilatory responses to submaximal cycling.
- Author
-
Bentley, Robert F., Bernal, Jonaline B., Basile, Daniel C., Di Salvo, Adam N., and Schwartz, Jacob L.
- Subjects
- *
EXERCISE physiology , *POSTURE , *VASTUS lateralis , *SKELETAL muscle , *OXYGEN saturation - Abstract
The completion of exercise in different body positions can impact the function of various components of the oxygen delivery pathway; however, the effect of the haemodynamic conditions induced by a semi‐upright body position on the integrative physiological response to exercise is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of a semi‐upright body position on cardiac output (CO), vastus lateralis oxygen saturation (SmO2${{S}_{{\mathrm{m}}{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$), oxygen consumption (V̇O2${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$) and ratings of perceived exertion (Borg RPE) during submaximal cycling. Twenty healthy individuals (22 ± 3 years, 50% female) each completed alternating 5‐min bouts of submaximal upright and semi‐upright (40° incline) cycling at 50 and 100 W. CO, SmO2${{S}_{{\mathrm{m}}{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$, V̇O2${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$ and RPE were assessed at rest and at each exercise intensity during steady state. There was a main effect of intensity on the increase in CO, SmO2${{S}_{{\mathrm{m}}{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$, V̇O2${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$ and RPE (all
P < 0.001). In a semi‐upright position, the increase in CO (7.9 ± 2.8 vs. 6.4 ± 2.6 L/min,P < 0.001), RPE (median (interquartile range): 11 (9–13) vs. 10 (8–12),P = 0.013) and the decrease in SmO2${{S}_{{\mathrm{m}}{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$ (−38 ± 23 vs. −21% ± 18%,P < 0.001) were greater than upright, while the increase in V̇O2${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$ was attenuated (1.030 ± 0.130 vs. 1.154 ± 0.165 L/min,P < 0.001). These results suggest that while a semi‐upright body position produces elevations in CO, these elevations do not seem to perfuse the active skeletal muscle. This may explain the elevation in RPE despite a blunting in the increase in V̇O2${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$. Further work is required to understand the effects of a semi‐upright exercise position on skeletal muscle activation and lower limb blood flow. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF