Search

Background: Although typically measured during the resting state, a growing literature is illustrating the ability to map intrinsic connectivity with functional MRI during task and naturalistic viewing conditions. These paradigms are drawing excitement due to their greater tolerability in clinical and developing populations and because they enable a wider range of analyses (e.g., inter-subject correlations). To be clinically useful, the test-retest reliability of connectivity measured during these paradigms needs to be established. This resource provides data for evaluating test-retest reliability for full-brain connectivity patterns detected during each of four scan conditions that differ with respect to level of engagement (rest, abstract animations, movie clips, lanker task). Data are provided for 13 participants, each scanned in 12 sessions with 10 minutes for each scan of the four conditions. Diffusion kurtosis imaging data was also obtained at each session. Findings: Technical validation and demonstrative reliability analyses were carried out at the connection-level using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and at network-level representations of the data using the Image Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. Variation in intrinsic functional connectivity across sessions was generally found to be greater than that attributable to scan condition. Between-condition reliability was generally high, particularly for the frontoparietal and default networks. Between-session reliabilities obtained separately for the different scan conditions were comparable, though notably lower than between-condition reliabilities. Conclusions: This resource provides a test-bed for quantifying the reliability of connectivity indices across subjects, conditions and time. The resource can be used to compare and optimize different frameworks for measuring connectivity and data collection parameters such as scan length. Additionally, investigators can explore the unique perspectives of the brain's functional architecture offered by each of the scan conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Direct current stimulation (DCS) affects both neuronal firing rate and synaptic efficacy. The neuronal input/output (I/O) function determines the likelihood that a neuron elicits an action potential in response to synaptic input of a given strength. Changes of the neuronal I/O function by DCS may underlie previous observations in animal models and human testing, yet have not been directly assessed. Objective Test if the neuronal input/output function is affected by DCS Methods Using rat hippocampal brain slices and computational modeling, we provide evidence for how DCS modulates the neuronal I/O function. Results We show for the first time that DCS modulates the likelihood of neuronal firing for a given and fixed synaptic input. Opposing polarization of soma and dendrite may have a synergistic effect for anodal stimulation, increasing the driving force of synaptic activity while simultaneously increasing spiking probability at the soma. For cathodal stimulation, however, the opposing effects tend to cancel. This results in an asymmetry in the strength of the effects of stimulation for opposite polarities. Conclusions Our results may explain the asymmetries observed in acute and long term effects of transcranial direct current stimulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In source localization of electroencephalograpic (EEG) signals, as well as in targeted transcranial electric current stimulation (tES), a volume conductor model is required to describe the flow of electric currents in the head. Boundary element models (BEM) can be readily computed to represent major tissue compartments, but cannot encode detailed anatomical information within compartments. Finite element models (FEM) can capture more tissue types and intricate anatomical structures, but with the higher precision also comes the need for semi-automated segmentation, and a higher computational cost. In either case, adjusting to the individual human anatomy requires costly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and thus head modeling is often based on the anatomy of an ‘arbitrary’ individual (e.g. Colin27). Additionally, existing reference models for the human head often do not include the cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF), and their field of view excludes portions of the head and neck—two factors that demonstrably affect current-flow patterns. Here we present a highly detailed FEM, which we call ICBM-NY, or "New York Head". It is based on the ICBM152 anatomical template (a non-linear average of the MRI of 152 adult human brains) defined in MNI coordinates, for which we extended the field of view to the neck and performed a detailed segmentation of six tissue types (scalp, skull, CSF, gray matter, white matter, air cavities) at 0.5 mm 3 resolution. The model was solved for 231 electrode locations. To evaluate its performance, additional FEMs and BEMs were constructed for four individual subjects. Each of the four individual FEMs (regarded as the ‘ground truth’) is compared to its BEM counterpart, the ICBM-NY, a BEM of the ICBM anatomy, an ‘individualized’ BEM of the ICBM anatomy warped to the individual head surface, and FEMs of the other individuals. Performance is measured in terms of EEG source localization and tES targeting errors. Results show that the ICBM-NY outperforms FEMs of mismatched individual anatomies as well as the BEM of the ICBM anatomy according to both criteria. We therefore propose the New York Head as a new standard head model to be used in future EEG and tES studies whenever an individual MRI is not available. We release all model data online at neuralengr.com/nyhead/ to facilitate broad adoption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the visual system of primates, image information propagates across successive cortical areas, and there is also local feedback within an area and long-range feedback across areas. Recent findings suggest that the resulting temporal dynamics of neural activity are crucial in several vision tasks. In contrast, artificial neural network models of vision are typically feedforward and do not capitalize on the benefits of temporal dynamics, partly due to concerns about stability and computational costs. In this study, we focus on recurrent networks with feedback connections for visual tasks with static input corresponding to a single fixation. We demonstrate mathematically that a network's dynamics can be stabilized by four key features of biological networks: layer-ordered structure, temporal delays between layers, longer distance feedback across layers, and nonlinear neuronal responses. Conversely, when feedback has a fixed distance, one can omit delays in feedforward connections to achieve more efficient artificial implementations. We also evaluated the effect of feedback connections on object detection and classification performance using standard benchmarks, specifically the COCO and CIFAR10 datasets. Our findings indicate that feedback connections improved the detection of small objects, and classification performance became more robust to noise. We found that performance increased with the temporal dynamics, not unlike what is observed in core vision of primates. These results suggest that delays and layered organization are crucial features for stability and performance in both biological and artificial recurrent neural networks. Author summary: The visual cortex is a part of the brain that receives, integrates, and processes visual information. It is made up of many interconnected areas that work together to help us see. Studies have shown that lateral and feedback connections between these areas are essential for us to be able to see and understand the world around us. However, most computer vision models only consider feedforward connections. In this study, we looked at the stability of networks with feedback. We used mathematical tools to discover that layered networks with long-range feedback favor stability, as do biologically realistic implementations with temporal delays in the feedforward connections. We also demonstrated the performance advantages of adding feedback connections to convolutional networks in image classification and detection tasks. These results suggest that the organization of the visual system favors stability. This implies that biologically more realistic implementations of computational vision networks may be easier to train. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]