Search

Extracellular adenosine and adenine nucleotides induce various cellular responses through activation of P1 and P2 receptors. P1 receptors preferentially recognize adenosine and four different G protein-coupled receptors (A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3) subtypes) have been identified. On the other hand, P2 receptors are activated by adenine and/or uridine nucleotides and classified into two families: ionotropic P2X and G protein-coupled P2Y receptors. In this article, we summarize our studies which led to development of new potent and selective heterocyclic ligands for the adenosine receptors P1 and for the ATP receptors P2X(7).

MRE 2029-F20 [N-benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-yl-2-[5-(2,6-dioxo-1,3-dipropyl-2,3,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-purin-8-yl)-1-methyl-1H-pyrazol-3-yloxy]-acetamide] is a selective antagonist ligand of A2B adenosine receptors. For use as a radioligand, 1,3-diallyl-xanthine, the precursor of [3H]-MRE 2029-F20, was synthesized, and tritiated on the allyl groups. [3H]-MRE 2029-F20 bound to human A2B receptors expressed in CHO cells showed a KD value of 1.65+/-0.10 nM and Bmax value of 36+/-4 fmol/mg protein. [3H]-MRE2029-F20 represents a useful tool for the pharmacological characterization of human A2B adenosine receptor subtype.

DNA minor groove binders constitute an important class of derivatives in anticancer therapy. Some of these compounds form noncovalent complexes with DNA (e.g., distamycin A, Hoechst 33258, and pentamidine) while others DNA-binding compounds (such as CC-1065) cause cleavages in the DNA backbone. In this article, we have reviewed the minor groove binders currently in preclinical evaluation in the last years. Diarylamidines such as DAPI, berenil, and pentamidine; bis-benzimidazoles such as Hoechst 33258; ecteinascidins, pyrrololo [2,1-c]-[1,4]-benzodiazepines (PBDs), CC-1065, and distamycins are the classes discussed in this review article. A special section has been dedicated to hybrid molecules resulted by the combination of two minor groove binders, especially for derivatives of naturally occurring antitumor agents, such as anthramycin or the alkylating unit of the antibiotic CC-1065, and distamycin frames., (Copyright 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Med Res Rev, 24, No. 4, 475-528, 2004)

New A(3) adenosine receptor antagonists were synthesized and tested at human adenosine receptor subtypes. An advanced synthetic strategy permitted us to obtain a large amount of the key intermediate 5 that was then submitted to alkylation procedures in order to obtain the derivatives 6-8. These compounds were then functionalised into ureas at the 5-position (compounds 9-11, 18 and 19) to evaluate their affinity and selectivity versus hA(3) adenosine receptor subtype; in particular, compounds 18 and 19 displayed a value of affinity of 4.9 and 1.3 nM, respectively. Starting from 5, the synthetic methodologies employed permitted us to perform a rapid and a convenient divergent synthesis. A further improvement allowed the regioselective preparation of the N(8)-substituted compound 7. This method could be used as an helpful general procedure for the design of novel A(3) adenosine receptor antagonists without the difficulty of separating the N(8)-substituted pyrazolo[4,3-e]1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidines from the corresponding N(7)-isomers.

In the last years adenosine receptors have been extensively studied, and mainly at present we understand the importance of A(2A) and A(3) adenosine receptors. A(2A) selective adenosine receptors antagonists are promising new drugs for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, while A(3) selective adenosine receptors antagonists have been postulated as novel anti-inflammatory and antiallergic agents; recent studies also indicated a possible employment of these derivatives as antitumour agents. Lately different classes of compounds have been identified as potent A(2A) and A(3) antagonists. In this article we report the past and present efforts which led to development of more potent and selective A(2A) and A(3) antagonists. Our group has mainly worked on the pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine nucleus both as A(2A) and A(3) antagonists, aiming to improve the affinity, selectivity and the hydrophilic profile. In fact, we have synthesised several compounds endowed with high affinity and selectivity versus A(2A) adenosine receptors, as 2, 2a-c (K(i)A(2A)=0.12-0.19 nM), or A(3) adenosine receptors, as 4p (K(i)A(3)=0.01 nM) and 4q (K(i)A(3)=0.04 nM).

The study of visuospatial imagery processes in totally congenitally blind people makes it possible to understand the specific contribution of visual experience for imagery processes. We argue that blind people may have visuospatial imagery processes, but they suffer from some capacity limitations. Similar, although smaller, limitations and individual differences may be found in sighted people. Visuospatial imagery capacity was explored by asking people to follow an imaginary pathway through either two- or three-dimensional matrices of different complexity. The blind appear to use specific visuospatial processes in this task (Experiments 2 and 3), but they have difficulty with three-dimensional matrices; sighted people have no such difficulty with three-dimensional matrices (Experiment 1). On the other hand, when a three-dimensional pattern exceeded sighted capacity, the blind and sighted showed similar patterns of errors. Subsequent analyses suggested that both visuospatial processes and verbal mediation were used.