Search

Because both raloxifene (RLX) and alfacalcidol (ALF) have been established as therapeutic agents for osteoporosis, it is tempting to speculate that the combination therapy of RLX and ALF might provide benefits over that of either one alone. However, the efficacy of the combination therapy has not been reported yet. The purpose of this study was thus to assess the efficacy of the combination therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Sixty postmenopausal patients (mean age 71.62 +/- 9.9 years) with untreated osteoporosis were selected for this study, and were randomly divided into two groups by therapeutic regimen. Group A consisted of 28 patients treated with RLX plus ALF, while Group B consisted of 32 patients with RLX alone. Among them, 20 in group A and 22 in group B completed this study. Contrary to our expectations, at either 6 months or 12 months after the initiation of treatment, RLX plus ALF did not increase BMD at any of the skeletal sites measured, including lumbar spine, femur, and radius, nor did it reduce bone-specific alkaline phosphatase or N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen more than RLX alone. Our results do not support the hypothesis that the combination therapy of RLX and ALF exerts more beneficial effects on bone compared than with RLX alone. However, it still remains unclear from this study whether the combination therapy of RLX and ALF is more efficacious in preventing fractures compared with RLX alone. Further studies are needed to clarify these issues.

Purpose: To compare the effects of alendronate and raloxifene on lumbar bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover, and lipid metabolism in elderly women with osteoporosis., Subjects and Methods: One hundred twenty-two postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (mean age: 69.4 years) were randomly divided into 2 groups of 61 patients: the alendronate group and the raloxifene group. BMD of the lumbar spine, urinary level of cross-linked N-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX), and serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total cholesterol (TC), high and low density lipoprotein cholesterols (LDL-C and HDL-C, respectively), and triglycerides (TG) were measured during the 12-month-treatment period., Results: The trial in 50 patients in the alendronate group and 52 patients in the raloxifene group could be completed. Both alendronate and raloxifene increased lumbar BMD (+8.0% and +2.4% at 12 months, respectively), followed by reductions of urinary NTX level and serum ALP level; however, the effects of alendronate were more pronounced than those of raloxifene. Only raloxifene reduced the serum levels of TC and LDL-C (-3.9% and -7.7% at 12 months, respectively), without any significant effect on the serum HDL-C and TG levels., Conclusion: The present study confirmed the efficacy of alendronate greater than raloxifene in increasing lumbar BMD through its effect on marked reduction of the bone turnover more than by raloxifene, and some beneficial effects of raloxifene on lipid metabolism in elderly women with osteoporosis.

Raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, is indicated for the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. However, its effect on the risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) is unclear. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of raloxifene on these outcomes. To identify randomized controlled trials of raloxifene, a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Collaboration databases was performed from the date of inception of these databases to October 2007. Search was limited to trials that were published in peer-reviewed English-language medical journals. Articles were included in the meta-analysis if they had reported on DVT, PE, or thromboembolic events. Nine trials, including 24,523 postmenopausal women, (median age 59.4 years, range 55 to 67 years; median follow-up 24 months, range 3 to 67 months) met inclusion criteria. Therapy with raloxifene was associated with a 62% increase in odds of either DVT or PE (odds ratio = 1.62; 95% confidence interval = 1.25 to 2.09; p-value < 0.001). Similarly, raloxifene therapy was associated with 54% increase in odds of DVT (odds ratio = 1.54; 95% confidence interval = 1.13 to 2.11; p-value = 0.006) and 91% increase in odds of PE alone (odds ratio = 1.91;95% confidence interval = 1.05 to 3.47; p-value = 0.03). Raloxifene increases the risk of DVT and PE in postmenopausal women.

Objective: To evaluate whether 6 months of raloxifene was effective in treatment of chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis., Methods: Women with chronic pelvic pain and no endometriosis treatment for 6 months underwent laparoscopy for excision of all lesions. Those with biopsy-proven endometriosis were randomly allocated to raloxifene (180 mg) or placebo daily. A second laparoscopy was performed at 2 years, or earlier, if pain returned. Return of pain was defined as 2 months of pain equal to or more severe than that at study entry. Menstrual cycles and adverse events were recorded. The log rank test was used to compare the time to return of pain by drug group. Analyses were done as intent-to-treat., Results: A total of 127 of 158 women underwent surgery. Of these, 93 had biopsy-confirmed endometriosis and were randomly assigned to study treatment. Menstrual cycle length, pelvic pain severity, quality of life, bone mineral density, and adverse events did not differ between treatment groups. The Data Safety Monitoring Committee terminated the study early when the raloxifene group experienced pain (P=.03) and had second surgery (P=.016) significantly sooner than the placebo group. Interestingly, biopsy-proven endometriosis was not associated with return of pain (P=.6)., Conclusion: Raloxifene significantly shortened the time to return of chronic pelvic pain. Because recurrence of endometriosis lesions did not correlate with return of pain, other factors are implicated in pelvic pain., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.cliicaltrials.gov, NCT00001848, Level of Evidence: I.

Raloxifene (Evista) is a second-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that functions as an estrogen antagonist on breast and uterine tissues, and an estrogen agonist on bone. It is available in many countries worldwide for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, and has also been approved in the US for reducing the risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or postmenopausal women at increased risk of invasive breast cancer.Raloxifene reduces the risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women at high risk of invasive breast cancer and in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. In addition, it is a well established agent for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. There was no significant difference between raloxifene and tamoxifen in the reduction in the risk of invasive breast cancer achieved in postmenopausal women at high risk of such cancer. Raloxifene was associated with an increased, albeit rare, risk of venous thromboembolism across several placebo-controlled trials and an increased risk of fatal stroke in one placebo-controlled trial in postmenopausal woman at increased risk for major coronary events. However, raloxifene was associated with a lower risk of venous thromboembolic events and cataracts than tamoxifen in a head-to-head trial. The choice of chemoprevention agent must consider a risk-benefit assessment for each individual patient. In this context, raloxifene is a valuable option for the prevention of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or at high risk of invasive breast cancer.

A 59-year-old postmenopausal woman diagnosed to have primary osteoporosis began to take 60 mg daily of oral raloxifene. The platelet aggregation induced by 1 microM adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and the alpha2-antiplasmin activity were accelerated significantly after 8 weeks from the beginning of raloxifene-treatment, and gradually deteriorated up to 24 weeks. ADP markedly caused the phosphorylation of Akt in the platelets obtained at 24 weeks. Although there were no subjective complaints at 24 weeks, the medication was stopped with her consent to avoid any adverse effects due to thrombus formation. The platelet hyper-aggregability and Akt phosphorylation induced by ADP disappeared at 4 weeks after the cessation of medication. These results strongly suggest that raloxifene caused the acceleration of platelet aggregation and subclinical thrombus formation through the Akt signal pathway in this case.

Objective: To assess the effects of raloxifene on the ovaries, uterus, and serum hormone levels in premenopausal women., Design: Prospective study comparing pretreatment findings with findings for those on treatment., Setting: Government research hospital., Patient(s): Thirty women 35 to 47 years of age who were at high risk of breast cancer and had regular, ovulatory menstrual cycles., Intervention(s): Raloxifene (60 mg) and calcium (1,200 mg) daily for 2 years., Main Outcome Measure(s): Sonographic evidence of ovarian stimulation (>or=2 corpora lutea, or follicular cysts of >2 cm, or single follicular cyst of >3 cm). Changes in endometrial thickness, fibroid size, hormone levels, and menstrual-cycle length., Result(s): Fifteen subjects developed some cycles with asymptomatic ovarian stimulation, and 9 developed benign endometrial polyps, compared with 2 subjects and 1 subject pretreatment, respectively. Uterine fibroid size was unchanged during raloxifene use in 16 subjects with fibroids. On treatment, E(2) levels increased significantly only during the follicular phase, with peak E(2) levels significantly higher in cycles showing ovarian stimulation compared with those without. Sex hormone-binding globulin increased, but levels of LH, FSH, P, DHEAS, and T did not. Endometrial thickness and cycle length were unchanged., Conclusion(s): Premenopausal subjects receiving raloxifene showed sonographic and hormonal evidence of ovarian stimulation. Endometrial thickness, cycle length, and fibroid size were unchanged. Benign asymptomatic endometrial polyps developed in some.

Breast cancer is a devastating illness that affects tens of thousands of American women each year. Although no one can predict who will actually develop breast cancer, a number of risk factors have been found that allow clinicians to identify the women at highest risk. Recent research has focused on exploring options, such as chemoprevention, to prevent high-risk women from developing breast cancer. The selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulators (SERMs) were a logical choice for chemoprevention because of their well-known estrogen antagonist effects in the breast. Tamoxifen is the best studied of these agents and has been shown to reduce the incidence of all breast cancers by 38% and ER-positive tumors by 48%.(1) However, despite this large potential risk reduction, risk management with chemopreventive agents is still not routine. The primary deterrents are believed to be the significant adverse events associated with tamoxifen as well as a perceived decline in quality of life (QOL).(2-4) These concerns led researchers to consider other possible agents that would still be effective but would have fewer or more acceptable side effects than tamoxifen. Raloxifene was proposed as an alternative to tamoxifen based on its estrogen antagonist effects in the breast and its relative safety as an osteoporosis agent. In this article, we will review the trials that led to the emergence of both tamoxifen and raloxifene as chemopreventive agents and will then offer a management strategy for breast cancer prevention in the primary care setting.

Two questions regarding findings from the Women's Health Initiative are (1) What is the effect of various hormonal regimens including selective estrogen receptor modulators? and (2) Is the negative effect on cognitive functioning related to the older age (65+ years) of the women? This study addresses these two questions in a short-term randomized trial of the effects of raloxifene versus alendronate on cognition. The study found only one significant interaction where the raloxifene and alendronate group changed differently across the two testing occasions. Hence, raloxifene does not have any impact, positive or negative, on short-term cognitive functioning when compared to alendronate.

Background: Uterine fibroids are benign tumors that arise from individual smooth muscle cells of the uterus. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are ER ligands that act as estrogens in some tissues, while blocking estrogen action in others. There have been many clinical studies of various SERMs for uterine fibroid. However, their effectiveness is controversial., Objectives: To evaluate the evidence for the effectiveness and safety of selective estrogen receptor modulators in women with uterine fibroids., Search Strategy: We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, the Register of Chinese trials developed by the Chinese Cochrane Centre, and the Chinese Med Database, Chinese Biomedical Disc (CBMDisc 1978 to July 2004); VIP (1989 to October 2005)); China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI 1994 to 2003) in October 2005. We hand searched a number of journals, and searched reference lists, databases of ongoing trials and the Internet., Selection Criteria: We included randomized controlled studies of selective estrogen receptor modulators versus other forms of medical therapy or placebo in women in the reproductive age (18 to 45 years old) with confirmed uterine fibroid., Data Collection and Analysis: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. As the studies identified were not sufficiently similar and not of sufficient quality, we did not do a meta-analysis but summarized the data in a narrative format., Main Results: Three studies involving 215 participants were included, trial size varied from 25 to 100. Comparison interventions included no treatment, Poly vitamins, and leuprolide acetate depot plus raloxifene versus leuprolide plus placebo tablet. There was a tendency towards fibroid reduction with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), although this was not significant in all studies. All three studies mentioned adverse reactions but no detailed data were acquired in the included studies., Authors' Conclusions: There is no evidence from the limited number of studies that SERMs reduce the size of fibroids or improve clinical outcomes. Further studies are required to establish evidence of benefit of SERMs in treating women with uterine fibroids.

A survey was made of the changes in hemostasis and related inflammatory biomarkers for hormone treatments (HT) of women. Treatments included were oral and non-oral estrogens combined or not with progestogens, raloxifene, tamoxifene, tibolone and ethinylestradiol in oral contraceptives with non-androgenic progestogens. Special attention was given to dosages lower than the present standard dose and we explored how treatment variants approached a situation of minimal changes in biomarkers. For oral unopposed estrogens, dose reduction effectively reduced the changes in some hemostasis markers, but not in a specific set of anticoagulant variables (antithrombin, protein S, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and the endogenous thrombin potential assay for resistance to activated protein C). Inflammation markers from the liver showed a dose-dependent reduction but effects were not nullified at the lowest dose tested. It was concluded that adequate reduction of estrogen dose for these effects will coincide with the dose-range of efficacy. Androgenic progestogens may be suitable for further reducing the impact of estrogens on some of the anticoagulant variables; reductions of estrogen-induced C-reactive protein increases appear possible with specific progestogens (medroxyprogesterone actate, nomegestrol acetate). For non-oral unopposed estrogens, all variables except inflammation biomarkers from the vascular wall showed minimal changes. Reduction in vascular inflammatory biomarkers, considered to mark anti-inflammatory effects, is augmented by medroxyprogesterone actate or norethisterone acetate. It was concluded that unopposed, non-oral estrogen treatment is the present best available option approaching minimal effects of treatment on biomarkers. Progestogen selection requires more data. We postulated that minimal effects on all cardiovascular biomarkers should define the HT with maximal safety for venous and arterial vascular events. The survey has identified specific biomarkers sensitive to low-dose unopposed and opposed estrogen which can be used to characterize future preparations for HT.

The coagulation inhibitor potential (CIP) assay may detect major thrombophilia at a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 70-80%. Subnormal CIP might be associated with increased risk of thrombosis. This study compared the effect on CIP in plasma samples from postmenopausal women treated with four different regimens. Fibrin aggregation in plasma was monitored after activation with tissue factor. The effect of potentiated inhibition of coagulation was measured. Plasma samples from 202 healthy women randomly assigned to receive treatment for 12 weeks with conventional-dose or low-dose hormone therapy, raloxifene or tibolone were examined. Major thrombophilias were excluded. Compared with baseline, the median level in CIP was reduced by 64% in the conventional-dose group, by 38% in the low-dose group and by 31% in the raloxifene group, whereas for those treated with tibolone the median CIP increased by 9%. The median changes in CIP were significant for both hormone therapy groups (P < 0.0001) and for the raloxifene group (P = 0.003), but not for the tibolone group (P = 0.653). The 12 women with heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation had a significantly reduced median CIP level (P < 0.0001) at baseline. Hormone therapy and raloxifene, associated with venous thromboembolism, reduce the CIP. Tibolone does not reduce the CIP.

Recent studies have shown that hormone therapy (HT) is associated with an acquired resistance to activated protein C (APC). The aims of the present study were to evaluate a possible dose-response relationship and differential effects of different HT regimens on functionality of the APC system. Two hundred two healthy women were randomly assigned to receive treatment for 12 weeks with tablets containing either low-dose HT containing 1 mg 17ss-oestradiol + 0.5 mg norethisterone acetate (NETA) (n = 50), conventional-dose HT containing 2 mg 17ss-oestradiol and 1 mg NETA (n = 50), 2.5 mg tibolone (n = 51), or 60 mg raloxifene (n = 51). Normalized APC system sensitivity ratios (nAPCsr) were determined in plasma collected at baseline and after 12 weeks using a thrombin generation-based APC resistance test probed with either recombinant APC (rAPC) or thrombomodulin (rTM). NAPCsr increased in both the conventional- and low-dose HT groups, consistent with reduced sensitivity to APC. The increase was slightly more pronounced in the conventional-dose group, but the difference between the two HT groups was not statistically significant. The sensitivity to APC was only marginally altered in those allocated to tibolone. Consequently, tibolone showed a different phenotype as compared with the low-dose HT group. A small increase in nAPCsr with both rAPC and rTM was seen in the raloxifene-group, but the increase was less than in the low-dose HT group. Our findings indicate that oestrogen-progestin therapy induces an APC resistant phenotype, which may be related to dose, whereas tibolone and raloxifene only marginally alter the sensitivity to APC.

Background: Uterine fibroids are benign tumors that arise from individual smooth muscle cells of the uterus. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are ER ligands that act as estrogens in some tissues, while blocking estrogen action in others. There have been many clinical studies of various SERMs for uterine fibroid. However, their effectiveness is controversial., Objectives: To evaluate the evidence for the effectiveness and safety of selective estrogen receptor modulators in women with uterine fibroids., Search Strategy: We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, the Register of Chinese trials developed by the Chinese Cochrane Centre, and the Chinese Med Database, Chinese Biomedical Disc (CBMDisc 1978 to July 2004); VIP (1989 to October 2005)); China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI 1994 to 2003) in October 2005. We hand searched a number of journals, and searched reference lists, databases of ongoing trials and the Internet., Selection Criteria: We included randomized controlled studies of selective estrogen receptor modulators versus other forms of medical therapy or placebo in women in the reproductive age (18 to 45 years old) with confirmed uterine fibroid., Data Collection and Analysis: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. As the studies identified were not sufficiently similar and not of sufficient quality, we did not do a meta-analysis but summarized the data in a narrative format., Main Results: Three studies involving 215 participants were included, trial size varied from 25 to 100. Comparison interventions included no treatment, Poly vitamins, and leuprolide acetate depot plus raloxifene versus leuprolide plus placebo tablet. There was a tendency towards fibroid reduction with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), although this was not significant in all studies. All three studies mentioned adverse reactions but no detailed data were acquired in the included studies., Authors' Conclusions: There is no evidence from the limited number of studies that SERMs reduce the size of fibroids or improve clinical outcomes. Further studies are required to establish evidence of benefit of SERMs in treating women with uterine fibroids.

Background: Limited data are available regarding the cost-effectiveness of preventative therapies for postmenopausal women with osteopenia. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of raloxifene, alendronate and conservative care in this population., Methods: We developed a microsimulation model to assess the incremental cost and effectiveness of raloxifene and alendronate relative to conservative care. We assumed a societal perspective and a lifetime time horizon. We examined clinical scenarios involving postmenopausal women from 55 to 75 years of age with bone mineral density T-scores ranging from -1.0 to -2.4. Modeled health events included vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, invasive breast cancer, and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Raloxifene and alendronate were assumed to reduce the incidence of vertebral but not nonvertebral fractures; raloxifene was assumed to decrease the incidence of breast cancer and increase the incidence of VTEs. Cost-effectiveness is reported in $/QALYs gained., Results: For women 55 to 60 years of age with a T-score of -1.8, raloxifene cost approximately $50,000/QALY gained relative to conservative care. Raloxifene was less cost-effective for women 65 and older. At all ages, alendronate was both more expensive and less effective than raloxifene. In most clinical scenarios, raloxifene conferred a greater benefit (in QALYs) from prevention of invasive breast cancer than from fracture prevention. Results were most sensitive to the population's underlying risk of fracture and breast cancer, assumed efficacy and costs of treatment, and the discount rate., Conclusion: For 55 and 60 year old women with osteopenia, treatment with raloxifene compares favorably to interventions accepted as cost-effective.

Unlabelled: The double-blind, randomized raloxifene alendronate comparison trial was the first study designed to compare two osteoporosis therapies head-to-head for fracture risk reduction. The original protocol planned to treat 3000 postmenopausal women with alendronate 10 mg/day (ALN) or raloxifene 60 mg/day (RLX) for 5 years, and to recruit women (50-80 years old) with a femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) T-score between -2.5 and -4.0, inclusive, no prevalent vertebral fractures, and no prior bone-active agent use. The trial was stopped early, due to difficulty in finding treatment-naïve women to meet enrollment goals within the planned timeline, resulting in insufficient power to show non-inferiority between therapies in the primary endpoint (number of women with >or=1 new osteoporotic vertebral or nonvertebral fracture). Except for vertebral fractures, fracture analyses were based upon 1412 of the 1423 women randomized (mean age of 66 years). After 312+/-254 days (mean+/-SD), 22 women in the ALN group and 20 in the RLX group had new vertebral or nonvertebral fractures. Four women in the ALN group and none in the RLX group had moderate/severe vertebral fractures, a pre-specified endpoint (P=0.04). Lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip BMD were increased from baseline at 2 years in each group (P<0.001), with greater increases in the ALN group (each P<0.05). Similar numbers of women in each group had >or=1 adverse event and discontinued due to an adverse event. The only adverse events with an incidence that differed between groups were colonoscopy, diarrhea, and nausea; each was more common with ALN treatment (each P<0.05). One woman in each group had a venous thromboembolic event. One case of breast cancer occurred in each group. In summary, as this trial was terminated early, there was insufficient power to compare the fracture risks between alendronate and raloxifene. Safety profiles were as expected from clinical trial and post-marketing reports., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00035971.

Background: Raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), decreases total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in postmenopausal women and inhibits increases in intima-media thickness (IMT) in animal models. We tested whether up to 8 years exposure to raloxifene had an effect on subclinical atherosclerosis in the 4-year Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial and the follow-up study, the 4-year Continuing Outcomes Relevant to Evista (CORE) trial., Methods: A subsample of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, who had completed the MORE and CORE trials and were on average 68 years of age and 19 years postmenopausal at randomization into MORE, participated in this substudy. Within 6 months of cessation of study drug in CORE, right common carotid artery IMT (CIMT) and carotid artery stiffness and arterial compliance were measured at one of two sites (San Diego and San Francisco) using high-resolution B-mode ultrasound. CIMT and arterial stiffness measures were compared between women who had received raloxifene vs. placebo; the primary analysis included only women who were >or=80% drug compliant and had used

Osteoporotic fractures result in significant deficits in health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The accumulation of deficits resulting from osteoporosis and fractures is now recognized as a major cause of reduced HRQOL in women after the menopause and in later life. Some of these same postmenopausal women may also have deficits in HRQOL related to vasomotor symptoms during the menopausal transition. Although estrogen therapy has not been shown to improve overall HRQOL in late postmenopausal women in randomized, controlled trials, it may improve menopausal symptoms. In contrast, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) such as raloxifene may increase vasomotor symptoms. Although estrogen is not indicated for the primary prevention of osteoporosis, estrogen therapy may be considered for the postmenopausal woman at risk of osteoporotic fracture who is symptomatic and who is not at high risk of breast cancer or cardiovascular events. Raloxifene decreases risk of invasive breast cancer and may be considered in women at high risk of breast cancer. Decision making about osteoporosis treatment should also consider the impact of the treatment on HRQOL.

Objective: Although medications to prevent osteoporotic fractures have been proven to be effective, compliance to these therapies is generally poor. Therapeutic regimens for different anti-osteoporotic medications differ widely and it is currently unknown which regimen would be most preferred by patients., Research Design and Methods: We conducted a large, population-based study to discern which therapeutic attributes would be most preferable to a population representative of the age and sex distribution of patients with osteoporosis., Results: Our study sample was restricted to persons aged 55 years and over and comprised 2485 individuals (mean age of 64.5 years). The study population was predominantly female (90.3%) and two-thirds of the respondents reported current daily medication use. Nearly half (45%) of the study population preferred to take medications daily, while one in five preferred weekly therapy and 30% preferred monthly therapy (p < 0.0001 for between proportion comparisons). When given the option of choosing between three different medication regimen scenarios, those subjects not currently using anti-osteoporotic medications preferred a theoretical regimen which was daily and did not involve subsequent fasting and maintaining an upright posture., Conclusions: Our data suggest that compliance with osteoporotic medications could be improved if patients are able to choose a therapeutic regimen best suited to their particular needs. The majority of subjects preferred a drug which was taken daily and with minimal inconvenience, rather than a weekly drug with slightly more inconvenience. Given that most physicians currently prescribe anti-osteoporotic therapy as a weekly regimen, at the time of diagnosis physicians should ascertain which regimen would be most preferable to patients prior to initiating therapy.

A 53-year-old postmenopausal woman, who had a family history of cryptogenic liver cirrhosis, was diagnosed with osteoporosis, and started on the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) raloxifene 60 mg/day orally. She developed marked liver dysfunction. Her body mass index (BMI) was 26.5. Her blood chemistry indicated AST 342 IU/L, ALT 356 IU/L, and hyaluronic acid 255 ng/mL. An oral glucose tolerance test showed impaired glucose tolerance with marked insulin resistance. Histologically, we diagnosed this case as having pre-cirrhotic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). This is the first histologically confirmed case of NASH that was aggravated by raloxifene.

Introduction: We have recently reported that different hormone regimens given to healthy post-menopausal women had markedly different effects on activation of coagulation. Low-dose hormone therapy (HT) and raloxifene, as opposed to conventional-dose HT and tibolone, were associated with no or minor activation of coagulation. The aim of this study was to elucidate the mechanism(s) for differences in coagulation activation by analysing clotting and fibrinolytic factors and coagulation inhibitors., Materials and Methods: 202 healthy women were randomly assigned to receive treatment for 12 weeks with either low dose HT containing 1 mg 17 beta-estradiol+0.5 mg norethisterone acetate (NETA) (n=50), conventional dose HT containing 2 mg 17 beta-estradiol and 1 mg NETA (n=50), 2.5 mg tibolone (n=51), or 60 mg raloxifene (n=51) in an open-label design., Results: The conventional-and low-dose HT groups generally showed similar effects, i.e., reductions in both clotting factors and inhibitors, but the effects were markedly more pronounced in the conventional-dose HT group. Compared with the low-dose HT group those treated with tibolone showed more pronounced decreases in factor VII, less reduction of antithrombin and protein C and even increased levels in protein S and tissue factor pathway inhibitor. As opposed to the low-dose HT group the reductions in inhibitors in the raloxifene group were smaller. Moreover in those allocated to raloxifene reduced levels of fibrinogen were seen., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the different HT regimens and raloxifene exert differential effects on coagulation factors, inhibitors and fibrinolytic factors.

Objective: To assess the prevalence of skeletal pain in postmenopausal women before the onset of raloxifene treatment and the further course of pain during treatment in a naturalistic setting., Research Design and Methods: Prospective, uncontrolled, multicentre, 6-month, observational study in Germany. Clinical, diagnostic and pain data were collected at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months of raloxifene treatment from 3299 female outpatients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Physicians assessed the presence or absence of back pain, joint pain and diffuse bone pain at each visit, perceived sleep quality and the use of analgesics. Patients assessed intensity and frequency of pain using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) and a 5-point scale (from 'rarely' to 'permanently'), respectively., Results: At baseline, patients had mean (SD) age 67.6 (9.3) years, 89.4% were reported to have reduced bone mineral density, 39.8% had pre-existing fractures and 93.4% had skeletal pain (physician assessment): 85.1% had back pain, 41.8% joint pain and 32.5% diffuse bone pain. Median pain intensity on VAS was 66.0 mm. After 6 months of raloxifene treatment, the frequency and intensity of pain and use of analgesics for skeletal pain decreased consistently by approximately 50%. Pain frequency decreased in 58.2% and increased in 2.3% of patients. The median decrease in pain intensity from baseline to 6 months was 27.0 mm (46%). Patients' subjective quality of sleep improved: the proportion of patients who were reported to sleep well increased from 21.3% at baseline to 46.7% at 6 months. The decrease in relative pain frequency was greatest with diffuse pain (67.6%) followed by joint pain (36.9%) and back pain (32.5%)., Conclusion: Raloxifene treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis was associated with a marked reduction of skeletal pain and analgesic consumption and an improvement in subjective sleep quality. Further investigation in a randomised, placebo-controlled trial is warranted.

Despite significant progress in breast cancer treatment, mammary tumours still represent the second most frequent cause of cancer-related death in women in the US, with > 211,000 new cases in 2005; however, an expanding range of options for early diagnosis and more reliable risk assessment offers new alternatives for disease control by cancer prevention. Completed large studies with the classical selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) tamoxifen have demonstrated that preventing breast cancer pharmacologically is now possible. Novel SERMs, aromatase inhibitors and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists targeting hormonal pathways are being tested in clinical trials, revealing the potential for dramatic reductions in tumour incidence with minimal side effects; however, SERMs and aromatase inhibitors are effective only against estrogen receptor-positive tumours, thus chemopreventive drugs targeting other critical signalling pathways (such as retinoids, selective COX inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors) may provide a means to prevent estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. In the future, hormonal and estrogen receptor-independent agents may be combined to prevent the development of all mammary tumours. This article reviews the current and novel strategies for breast cancer prevention.

Context: Raloxifene is a promising breast cancer prevention agent in postmenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer. The effects of raloxifene in premenopausal women are unknown., Objective: We evaluated the effect of raloxifene in premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer on bone mineral density (BMD)., Design: This was a phase II clinical trial., Setting: This study was conducted at an academic medical center., Participants: Thirty-seven premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer enrolled in the trial. Thirty subjects began treatment and 27 were evaluable., Intervention: Raloxifene (60 mg daily) and elemental calcium (500 mg daily) were given for 2 yr. Subjects were followed up off medications for 1 yr., Main Outcome Measure: The primary end point was the intrasubject percent change in BMD at 1 yr measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry., Results: The mean baseline lumbar spine density was 1.027 g/cm(2). Lumbar spine density decreased 2.3% at 1 yr (P < 0.00001) and 3.5% at 2 yr (P < .00001). Percent change from yr 2 to 3 was +1.4%. The mean baseline total hip bone density was 0.905 g/cm(2). Total hip density decreased 0.3% at 1 yr and 1.0% at 2 yr (P = 0.033). Percent change from yr 2 to 3 was +1.7%., Conclusions: Raloxifene use is associated with a decrease in BMD in premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer. The clinical significance of this decrease is unknown and is attenuated with stopping raloxifene.

Many studies have addressed the effects of estrogenic compounds on platelet function. Raloxifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), which is currently used for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. At present, there are no clinical data about the effects of raloxifene on platelet function. The purpose of this study was to determine if raloxifene at therapeutic doses affects platelet function in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. The effects of raloxifene on platelet function were investigated using a commercial platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) with collagen epinephrine and collagen adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) cartridges. We studied platelet function of 30 patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis before and 15 days after initiation of raloxifene 60 mg/daily. Closure times did not differ significantly between samples obtained before (117.8 +/- 20.5 s) and after raloxifene therapy (106.5 +/- 25.4 s) in collagen/epinephrine cartridges (P > 0.05). There was also no statistically significant difference in mean closure times with collagen/ADP cartridges at baseline (86.2 +/- 18.5 s) and after raloxifene therapy (84.4 +/- 13.8 s) (P > 0.05). Platelet counts (278.3 +/- 72.9 vs. 262.4 +/- 56.7 109/L, P > 0.05) and mean platelet volumes (8.9 +/- 1 vs. 9.1 +/- 1 fL, P > 0.05) were not different before and after raloxifene therapy. Although estrogen related compounds do affect platelet function, there is suggestive data in our study that raloxifene in therapeutic dose exhibit no effect on platelet function in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) is designated as synthetic ligands for estrogen receptors (ERs), exhibiting tissue-specific agonisitic/antagonisitic activities. Among SERM, raloxifen is a most clinically successful as an anti-oseteoporotic agent. Such tissue-specific actions of SERM are presumed to mediate through unusual structure alteration of liganded ERs coupled with co-regulator recruitments.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) bind to estrogen receptor (ER) and develop tissue-selective actions as estrogen agonists or antagonists. As such, SERMs have been developed to exert estrogen-like beneficial effects against some disorders including osteoporosis, while reducing estrogen-related risks, including breast cancer. Prevention of vertebral fractures by a SERM, raloxifene (RLX), in osteoporotic postmenopausal women has been well established. RLX does not increase or decrease cardiovascular events, overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality or the overall number of strokes, but there appears to be a small increase in stroke mortality. Both RLX and tamoxifen similarly reduce the risk of ER-positive invasive breast cancer. At the same time, RLX treatment is associated with 36% fewer uterine cancer incidence and 29% less thromboembolic events. Keeping these results in mind, it is our responsibility to critically evaluate and decide timing and length of treatment, as well as subjects with benefits or risks for the treatment of osteoporosis by SERMs.

Background: The effect of raloxifene, a selective estrogen-receptor modulator, on coronary heart disease (CHD) and breast cancer is not established., Methods: We randomly assigned 10,101 postmenopausal women (mean age, 67.5 years) with CHD or multiple risk factors for CHD to 60 mg of raloxifene daily or placebo and followed them for a median of 5.6 years. The two primary outcomes were coronary events (i.e., death from coronary causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome) and invasive breast cancer., Results: As compared with placebo, raloxifene had no significant effect on the risk of primary coronary events (533 vs. 553 events; hazard ratio, 0.95; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.07), and it reduced the risk of invasive breast cancer (40 vs. 70 events; hazard ratio, 0.56; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.83; absolute risk reduction, 1.2 invasive breast cancers per 1000 women treated for one year); the benefit was primarily due to a reduced risk of estrogen-receptor-positive invasive breast cancers. There was no significant difference in the rates of death from any cause or total stroke according to group assignment, but raloxifene was associated with an increased risk of fatal stroke (59 vs. 39 events; hazard ratio, 1.49; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.00 to 2.24; absolute risk increase, 0.7 per 1000 woman-years) and venous thromboembolism (103 vs. 71 events; hazard ratio, 1.44; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.95; absolute risk increase, 1.2 per 1000 woman-years). Raloxifene reduced the risk of clinical vertebral fractures (64 vs. 97 events; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.47 to 0.89; absolute risk reduction, 1.3 per 1000)., Conclusions: Raloxifene did not significantly affect the risk of CHD. The benefits of raloxifene in reducing the risks of invasive breast cancer and vertebral fracture should be weighed against the increased risks of venous thromboembolism and fatal stroke. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00190593 [ClinicalTrials.gov].)., (Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

This post hoc analysis reports the effects of raloxifene on lipids and lipoproteins in 2659 women with either normal (< or =150 mg/dL) or high (>150 mg/dL) triglyceride levels from a substudy of the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial. In both triglyceride subgroups, raloxifene significantly improved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein A-I, and fibrinogen compared with placebo (P < .05). After raloxifene treatment, women with high triglycerides experienced an equal or more robust reduction in cholesterol, lipoprotein parameters, and ratios of total cholesterol to HDL-C and non-HDL-C to HDL-C than was observed in women with normal triglycerides (P < .05). Mean levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B were reduced by 16.5% and 15.8%, respectively, in women with high triglycerides, and by 12.7% and 11.3%, respectively, in women with normal triglycerides. These findings further substantiate that raloxifene improves concentrations of both cholesterol and beta-lipoprotein. The subgroup of women with high triglycerides, who have elevated cardiovascular risk, appear to derive at least equal, if not greater, overall effect on lipid and lipoprotein lowering with raloxifene.

Context: Tamoxifen has been approved for breast cancer risk reduction in high-risk women, but how raloxifene compares with tamoxifen is unknown., Objective: To compare the differences in patient-reported outcomes, quality of life [QOL], and symptoms in Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) participants by treatment assignment., Design, Setting, Participants, and Interventions: STAR was a double-blind, randomized phase 3 prevention trial designed to evaluate the relative efficacy of raloxifene vs tamoxifen in reducing the incidence of invasive breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women. Between July 1, 1999, and November 4, 2004, 19,747 participants were enrolled at centers throughout North America, with a median potential follow-up time of 4.6 years (range, 1.2-6.5 years). Patient-reported symptoms were collected from all participants using a 36-item symptom checklist. Quality of life was measured with the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D), and the Medical Outcomes Study Sexual Activity Questionnaire in a substudy of 1983 participants, median potential follow-up 5.4 years (range, 4.6-6.0 years). Questionnaires were administered before treatment, every 6 months for 60 months and at 72 months., Main Outcome Measures: Primary QOL end points were the SF-36 physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summaries., Results: Among women in the QOL analysis, mean PCS, MCS, and CES-D scores worsened modestly over the study's 60 months, with no significant difference between the tamoxifen (n = 973) and raloxifene (n = 1010) groups (P>.2). Sexual function was slightly better for participants assigned to tamoxifen (age-adjusted repeated measure odds ratio, 1.22%; 95% CI, 1.01-1.46). Of the women in the symptom assessment analyses, the 9769 in the raloxifene group reported greater mean symptom severity over 60 months of assessments than the 9743 in the tamoxifen group for musculoskeletal problems (1.15 vs 1.10, P = .002), dyspareunia (0.78 vs 0.68, P<.001), and weight gain (0.82 vs 0.76, P<.001). Women in the tamoxifen group reported greater mean symptom severity for gynecological problems (0.29 vs 0.19, P<.001), vasomotor symptoms (0.96 vs 0.85, P<.001), leg cramps (1.10 vs 0.91, P<.001), and bladder control symptoms (0.88 vs 0.73, P<.001)., Conclusions: No significant differences existed between the tamoxifen and raloxifene groups in patient-reported outcomes for physical health, mental health, and depression, although the tamoxifen group reported better sexual function. Although mean symptom severity was low among these postmenopausal women, those in the tamoxifen group reported more gynecological problems, vasomotor symptoms, leg cramps, and bladder control problems, whereas women in the raloxifene group reported more musculoskeletal problems, dyspareunia, and weight gain., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00003906.

In the last 30 years bisphosphonates have been used in the treatment of different bone diseases. Bisphosphonates in their oral pharmaceutical form are an established and approved medication in osteoporosis treatment for years. Latest research developed more potent bisphosphonates in different application forms: oral and parenteral. Therefore, their prospects for medical treatment could be enlarged to the fields of oncology, hematology, and osteology. Bisphosphonates are innovative in case of adjuvant therapy as well as in adequate pain therapy. In the medical treatment of osteoporosis and metabolic osteopathies bisphosphonates could be rightly denoted as groundbreaking.