Search

A fundamental issue in molecular endocrinology is to define how agonist:receptor interaction differs from antagonist:receptor interaction. The vasopressin V1a receptor (V1aR) is a member of a subfamily of related G protein-coupled receptors that are activated by the hormone AVP or related peptides. The N-terminus of the V1aR has recently been shown to be critical for binding agonists but not antagonists. Using a combination of N-terminally truncated constructs and alanine-scanning mutagenesis, individual residues that provide these agonist-specific binding epitopes have now been identified in this study. Our data establish that a single residue, Arg46, is critical for AVP binding to the V1aR. Systematic substitution revealed that Arg was required at this locus and could not be substituted by Lys, Glu, Leu, or Ala. In contrast, antagonist binding (cyclic or linear, peptide or nonpeptide) was unaffected. Disruption of Arg46 also resulted in defective intracellular signaling. Arginine is conserved at this locus in all members of the neurohypophysial peptide hormone receptor family cloned to date, indicative of a fundamental role in receptor function. In addition to Arg46, the residues Leu42, Gly43, Asp45 form a patch contributing to AVP binding. This study provides molecular insight into the role of the V1aR N-terminus and key differences between agonist and antagonist binding requirements.

For most audiences, the term "diabetes" conjures thoughts of high levels of blood glucose and of the symptoms that characterize diabetes mellitus. In the last few years, a spirited campaign spear-headed by the families of affected individuals has made progress in educating nonprofessional and medical communities about diabetes insipidus (DI), the other disease characterized by polyuria (i.e., diabetes). Much work lies ahead to find better treatments for this affliction, but the progress in molecular biology over the last years made possible the identification of the genetic defects underlying the inherited forms of the disease. Numerous cases of adult-onset DI are triggered by toxic damage to the kidneys that impairs the concentrating capacity of the nephrons by a nonspecific mechanism. In these pages I shall deal mostly with the inherited forms of the disease. Diabetes insipidus is characterized by the inability of the kidneys of affected individuals to produce concentrated urine (Morello and Bichet 2001). The elimination of large volumes of diluted urine (polyuria) and excessive thirst (polydipsia) are the chief symptoms of the disease. Although this condition and the hints that it was a hereditary disease were described at the end of the 19th century, it took almost 100 years to gain molecular knowledge about its etiology. A brief review of the important role played by vasopressin in the maintenance of body fluids will help the reader understand the severity of this disease.

In order to produce large amounts of human vasopressin and oxytocin receptors compatible with direct structural biology approaches such as X-ray crystallography, NMR or mass spectrometry, we have expressed these neurohypophysial hormone receptors in Escherichia coli. To facilitate the level of expression, the coding sequence for the V1a vasopressin receptor and the oxytocin receptor were first optimized for bacterial expression. The resulting 'bacterial receptor cDNAs' were then subcloned into pET/T7-driven prokaryotic expression vectors. Different constructs have been prepared: each cDNA was incorporated alone or in fusion with a T7 tag sequence or a glutathione-S-transferase tag sequence at the N-terminus end. Moreover, a 6 x His tag sequence has been added at the C-terminus end for one-step purification of the receptors. Screening of BL21(DE3) and BL21(DE3)pLysS bacterial strains transformed with the different constructions was achieved by Coomassie blue-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gels and by 6 x His antibody Western blotting. Several clones were selected for purification of the receptors. Expression levels of the receptors are now encouraging and will be optimized for further structural and functional studies. Moreover, at the same time, the construction of the bacterial-optimized sequence of the V2 vasopressin receptor and its expression will be performed.

AVP receptors represent a logical target for drug development. As a new class of therapeutic agents, orally active AVP analogs could be used to treat several human pathophysiological conditions including neurogenic diabetes insipidus, the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of AVP (SIADH), congestive heart failure, arterial hypertension, liver cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome, dysmenorrhea, and ocular hypertension. By immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting, we elucidated the phosphorylation pattern of green fluorescent protein-tagged AVP receptors and showed interactions with the specific kinases PKC and GRK5 that are agonist-, time- and receptor subtype-dependent. The tyrosine residue of the NPWIY motif present in the 7th helix of AVP receptors is rapidly and transiently phosphorylated after agonist stimulation. This phosphorylation is instrumental in the genesis of the mitogenic cascade linked to the activation of this receptor, presumably by establishing key intramolecular contacts and by participating in the creation of a scaffold of proteins that produce the activation of downstream kinases. The random screening of chemical entities and optimization of lead compounds recently resulted in the development of orally active non-peptide AVP receptor agonists and antagonists. Furthermore, the identification of the molecular determinants of receptor-ligand interactions should facilitate the development of more potent and very selective orally active compounds via the approach of structure-based drug design. We developed three-dimensional molecular docking models of peptide and non-peptide ligands to the human V1 vascular, V2 renal and V3 pituitary AVP receptors. Docking of the peptide hormone AVP to the receptor ligand binding pockets reflects its dual polar and non-polar structure, but is receptor subtype-specific. The characteristics of non-peptide AVP analogs docking to the receptors are clearly distinct from those of peptide analogs docking. Molecular modeling of the results of site-directed mutagenesis experiments performed in CHO cells stably transfected with the human AVP receptor subtypes revealed that non-peptide antagonists establish key contacts with a few amino acid residues of the receptor subtypes that are different from those involved in agonist binding. Moreover, these interactions are species-specific. These findings provide further understanding of the signal transduction pathways of AVP receptors and new leads for elucidation of drug-receptor interactions and optimization of drug design. NOTE TO THE READER: The recent cloning and molecular characterization of AVP/OT receptor subtypes call for the revision of their nomenclature. For the sake of clarity and reference to their main site of expression, we call the V1a receptor the V1 vascular receptor, the V2 receptor the V2 renal receptor and the V1b or V3 receptor the V3 pituitary receptor in the present review.

Background: Essential hypertension is a prevalent complex polygenic disease and a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death in developed countries. Because of its complex and multifactorial nature, its genetic determinants still remain largely unknown. The Dahl salt-sensitive hypertensive rat model exhibits impaired sodium handling, which is hypothesized to play a key role in the pathophysiology of polygenic hypertension. Thus, genes associated with renal regulation of salt and water balance are a priori likely candidates for a causative role in hypertension pathogenesis. The functional properties and renal-specific expression of the recently characterized AngII/AVP receptor suggest a putative modulator role in tubular sodium and fluid reabsorption. Based on these observations, we investigated the potential involvement of the AngII/AVP receptor in salt-sensitive hypertension., Materials and Methods: We performed cosegregation analysis of the AngII/AVP receptor locus with salt-sensitive hypertension in an F2 (Dahl S X Dahl salt-resistant [R]) hybrid male cohort characterized for blood pressure by radiotelemetry after 8 weeks of high salt challenge. Further molecular analysis was done to identify putative AngII/AVP receptor molecular variants that could account for the AngII/ AVP receptor involvement in salt-sensitive hypertension pathogenesis., Results: The AngII/AVP receptor was mapped to rat chromosome 1, 1.7 cM centromeric to the D1Rat188 marker by radiation hybrid mapping analysis. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis detected a highly significant linkage of the AngII/AVP receptor locus with high blood pressure (LRS = 13.8, p= 0.0002). Molecular characterization of the Dahl S and Dahl R AngII/AVP receptor cDNAs revealed two amino acid substitutions in the Dahl S AngII/AVP receptor (N119S, C163R) when compared to the Dahl R AngII/AVP receptor. These mutations are associated with an increased receptor affinity for both ligands (AVP and AngII) and an enhanced G(s)-coupling by the receptor resulting in increased activation of adenylate cyclase with concomitant increase in cAMP production., Conclusions: The observed molecular dysfunction in the Dahl S AngII/AVP receptor is consistent with increased tubular sodium and fluid reabsorption observed in Dahl S rats. Interestingly, the AngII/AVPr locus is within the narrowed chromosome 1 QTL region for blood pressure detected in different rat intercross linkage analyses. Altogether, the data strongly suggest that the AngII/AVP receptor is a hypertension susceptibility gene in the Dahl S rat model, as well as raises the hypothesis that it too underlies the chromosome 1 blood pressure QTL identified in other hypertension rat models.

The nonapeptide hormones arginine vasopressin (CYFQNCPRG-NH2, AVP) and oxytocin (CYIQNCPLG-NH2, OT), control many essential functions in mammals. Their main activities include the urine concentration (via stimulation of AVP V2 receptors, V2R, in the kidneys), blood pressure regulation (via stimulation of vascular V1a AVP receptors, V1aR), ACTH control (via stimulation of V1b receptors, V1bR, in the pituitary) and labor and lactation control (via stimulation of OT receptors, OTR, in the uterus and nipples, respectively). All four receptor subtypes belong to the GTP-binding (G) protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family. This work consists of docking of YM087, a potent non-peptide V1aR and V2R - but not OTR - antagonist, into the receptor models based on relatively new theoretical templates of rhodopsin (RD) and opiate receptors, proposed by Mosberg et al. (Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA). It is simultaneously demonstrated that this RD template satisfactorily compares with the first historical GPCR structure of bovine rhodopsin (Palczewski et al., 2000) and that homology-modeling of V2R, V1aR and OTR using opiate receptors as templates is rational, based on relatively high (20-60%) sequence homology among the set of 4 neurophyseal and 4 opiate receptors. YM087 was computer-docked to V1aR, V2R and OTR using the AutoDock (Olson et al., Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, USA) and subsequently relaxed using restrained simulated annealing and molecular dynamics, as implemented in AMBER program (Kollman et al., University of California, San Francisco, USA). From about 80 diverse configurations, sampled for each of the three ligand/receptor systems, 3 best energy-relaxed complexes were selected for mutual comparisons. Similar docking modes were found for the YM087/V1aR and YM087/V2R complexes, diverse from those of the YM087/OTR complexes, in agreement with the molecular affinity data.

We investigated the targeting of the V(1a) receptor fused with the green fluorescence protein (V(1a)R-GFP) in polarized MDCK cells. Cells expressing V(1a)R-GFP displayed binding to vasopressin (AVP) and AVP-induced calcium responses, similar to cells expressing the wild-type V1a receptor. Interestingly, as with the wild-type V(1a)R, V(1a)R-GFP is preferentially distributed in the basolateral side of MDCK cells as monitored by confocal microscopy. Furthermore, AVP induced internalization of GFP-tagged receptors. Therefore, the GFP-tagged V(1a) receptor retains all the sorting signals of the wild-type receptor and offers an excellent system to elucidate the mechanisms of cell trafficking of V(1a) receptors.

Previous studies have shown that the G protein-coupled human vasopressin V(2) receptor (V(2) receptor) is expressed predominantly in the basolateral membrane of Madin Darby canine kidney type II (MDCKII) epithelial cells at steady state. Here we have assessed the influence of the individual cytoplasmic domains of the V(2) receptor on polarized sorting in MDCKII cells. The second (ICL2) and third (ICL3) intracellular loops and the C-terminal tail were fused separately to a green fluorescent protein-tagged receptor fragment comprising the first transmembrane domain and flanking regions. We show that the ICL2 domain of the V(2) receptor alone promotes basolateral cell surface expression and thus seems to contain the basolateral sorting signal of the V(2) receptor. Fusion of the other cytoplasmic domains, however, does not lead to a randomized cell surface expression. The C-terminal tail of the V(2) receptor promotes apical targeting. Fusion of ICL3 leads to a receptor fragment that is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The results are consistent with a model in which the V(2) receptor contains signals for both apical and basolateral cell surface expression, the latter being dominant. Furthermore, ICL3 may contain a RXR [corrected] ER retention signal, which is not accessible in the correctly folded full-length receptor but which is unmasked when ICL3 is fused alone.

In this study, we establish that the V1a vasopressin receptor (V1aR) is palmitoylated, and we show that this modification has an important functional role. Palmitoylation of the V1aR occurs within the Cys371/Cys372 couplet located in the proximal C-terminal tail domain. Substitution of these residues in a [C371G/C372G]V1aR construct effectively disrupted receptor palmitoylation. Our data also indicate an additional palmitoylation site at another locus in the receptor, as yet undefined. [3H]Palmitate incorporation was agonist-sensitive and increased following exposure to [Arg8]vasopressin (AVP). Given the hydrophobic nature of the acyl chain, palmitoylation of the C terminus of G-protein-coupled receptors has been proposed to form an additional intracellular loop. Consequently, palmitoylation/depalmitoylation will have a profound effect on the local conformation of this domain. The V1aR palmitoylation status regulated both phosphorylation and sequestration of the receptor, and furthermore, palmitoylation, phosphorylation, and sequestration were all regulated by AVP. The palmitoylation-defective construct [C371G/C372G]V1aR exhibited decreased phosphorylation compared to wild-type V1aR, under both basal and AVP-stimulated conditions, and was sequestered at a faster rate. In contrast, the binding of four different classes of ligand and intracellular signaling were not affected by palmitoylation. This study therefore establishes that there are different conformational requirements for signaling, agonist-induced phosphorylation, and sequestration of the V1aR.

We report the solid phase synthesis of four pairs of L- and D-thienylalanine (Thi/D-Thi) position two modified analogues of the following four oxytocin (OT) antagonists: des-9-glycinamide [1-(beta-mercapto-beta,beta-pentamethylene propionic acid), 2-O-methyltyrosine, 4-threonine]ornithine-vasotocin (desGly(NH2)9,d (CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2,Thr4]OVT) (A); the Tyr-(NH2)9 analogue of (A), d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2,Thr4,Tyr-(NH2)9]OVT (B); the Eda9 analogue (where Eda = ethylenediamine) of (A), d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2, Thr4, Eda9]OVT (C); and the retro Tyr10 modified analogue of (C), d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2, Thr4, Eda9<--Tyr10]OVT (D). The eight new analogues of A-D are (1) desGly(NH2),d(CH2)5[Thi2,Thr4]OVT, (2) desGly(NH2),d(CH2)5[D-Thi2,Thr4]OVT, (3) d(CH2)5[Thi2, Thr4,Tyr-(NH2)9]OVT, (4) d(CH2)5[D-Thi2,Thr4,Tyr-(NH2)9]OVT (5) d(CH2)5[Thi2,Thr4Eda9]OVT, (6) d(CH2)5[D-Thi2,Thr4,Eda9]OVT, (7) d(CH2) [Thi2,Thr4,Eda9<--Tyr10]OVT, (8) d(CH2),[D-Thi2,Thr4,Eda9<--Tyr10]OVT. We also report the synthesis of (C). Peptides 1-8 and C were evaluated for agonistic and antagonistic activities in in vitro and in vivo OT assays, in in vivo vasopressor (V1a receptor) assays and in in vivo antidiuretic (V2 receptor) assays. None of the eight peptides nor C exhibit oxytocic or vasopressor agonism. Peptides 1-8 are extremely weak V2 agonists (antidiuretic activities range from < 0.0005 to 0.20 U/mg). Peptide C is a weak mixed V2 agonist/antagonist. Peptides 1-8 and C exhibit potent in intro (no Mg2+) OT antagonism (anti-OT pA2 values range from 7.76 to 8.05). Peptides 1-8 are all OT antagonists in vivo (estimated in vivo anti-OT pA2 values range from 6.54-7.19). With anti-V1a pA2 values of approximately 5-5.80, peptides 1-8 exhibit marked reductions in anti-V1a potencies relative to those of the parent peptides A-D (anti-V1a pA2 range from 6.48 to 7.10) and to l-deamino[D-Tyr(Et)2, Thr4]OVT (Atosiban, trade name Tractocile) (anti-V1a pA2-6.14). Atosiban has recently been approved in Europe for clinical use for the prevention of premature labour (Pharm. J. 264(7-100): 871). Peptides 1-8 exhibit striking gains in in vitro anti-OT/anti-V1a selectivities with respect to the parent peptides A, B, C and D and to Atosiban. Peptides 1-8 exhibit anti-OT (in vitro)/anti-V1a selectivities of 450, 525, 550, 450, approximately 1080, 116, 355, 227 respectively. The corresponding values for A-D and Atosiban are 30, 4.2, 4.3, 2.6 and 37. With the exception of peptide 6, the remaining seven peptides exhibit 3-18-fold gains in anti-OT (in vivo)/anti-V1a selectivity with respect to Atosiban, peptides 1-8 exhibit anti-OT (in vivo)/anti-V1a selectivities of 22, approximately 82, approximately 82, 147, approximately 83, 11, 31 and 42. By comparison, Atosiban exhibits an anti-OT (in vivo)/anti-V1a selectivity = 8. With an estimated in vivo anti-OT pA2 value = 7.19+/-0.06, peptide 4 is equipotent with Atosiban (pA2 = 7.05+/-0.05). However, with its significantly reduced anti-vasopressor potency, pA2 = approximately 5, it is approximately 18 times more selective for OT receptors with respect to VP V1a receptors than Atosiban. Since we have shown that V1a antagonism could be an unwanted side-effect in tocolytics, peptide 4 and some of the OT antagonists reported here have advantages over Atosiban and thus may be suitable candidates for evaluation as potential tocolytic agents for the treatment of preterm labour.

To facilitate structure-function relationship studies of the V2 vasopressin receptor, a prototypical G(s)-coupled receptor, we generated V2 receptor-expressing yeast strains (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) that required arginine vasopressin-dependent receptor/G protein coupling for cell growth. V2 receptors heterologously expressed in yeast were unable to productively interact with the endogenous yeast G protein alpha subunit, Gpa1p, or a mutant Gpa1p subunit containing the C-terminal G alpha(q) sequence (Gq5). In contrast, the V2 receptor efficiently coupled to a Gpa1p/G alpha(s) hybrid subunit containing the C-terminal G alpha(s) sequence (Gs5), indicating that the V2 receptor retained proper G protein coupling selectivity in yeast. To gain insight into the molecular basis underlying the selectivity of V2 receptor/G protein interactions, we used receptor saturation random mutagenesis to generate a yeast library expressing mutant V2 receptors containing mutations within the second intracellular loop. A subsequent yeast genetic screen of about 30,000 mutant receptors yielded four mutant receptors that, in contrast to the wild-type receptor, showed substantial coupling to Gq5. Functional analysis of these mutant receptors, followed by more detailed site-directed mutagenesis studies, indicated that single amino acid substitutions at position Met(145) in the central portion of the second intracellular loop of the V2 receptor had pronounced effects on receptor/G protein coupling selectivity. We also observed that deletion of single amino acids N-terminal of Met(145) led to misfolded receptor proteins, whereas single amino acid deletions C-terminal of Met(145) had no effect on V2 receptor function. These findings highlight the usefulness of combining receptor random mutagenesis and yeast expression technology to study mechanisms governing receptor/G protein coupling selectivity and receptor folding.

Understanding of the molecular determinants responsible for antagonist binding to the oxytocin receptor should provide important insights that facilitate rational design of potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of preterm labor. To study ligand/receptor interactions, we used a novel photosensitive radioiodinated antagonist of the human oxytocin receptor, d(CH(2))(5) [Tyr(Me)(2),Thr(4),Orn(8),Phe(3(125)I,4N(3))-NH(2)9]vasotocin. This ligand had an equivalent high affinity for human oxytocin and V(1a) vasopressin receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Taking advantage of this dual specificity, we conducted photoaffinity labeling experiments on both receptors. Photolabeled oxytocin and V(1a) receptors appeared as a unique protein band at 70-75 kDa and two labeled protein bands at 85-90 and 46 kDa, respectively. To identify contact sites between the antagonist and the receptors, the labeled 70-75- and the 46-kDa proteins were cleaved with CNBr and digested with Lys-C and Arg-C endoproteinases. The fragmentation patterns allowed the identification of a covalently labeled region in the oxytocin receptor transmembrane domain III consisting of the residues Leu(114)-Val(115)-Lys(116). Analysis of contact sites in the V(1a) receptor led to the identification of the homologous region consisting of the residues Val(126)-Val(127)-Lys(128). Binding domains were confirmed by mutation of several CNBr cleavage sites in the oxytocin receptor and of one Lys-C cleavage site in the V(1a) receptor. The results are in agreement with previous experimental data and three-dimensional models of agonist and antagonist binding to members of the oxytocin/vasopressin receptor family.

Most of the large family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) possess putative N-glycosylation sites within their N-termini. However, for the vast majority of GPCRs, it has not been determined which, if any, of the consensus glycosylation sites are actually utilized or what the functional ramifications are of modification by oligosaccharide. The occurrence and function of glycosylation of the V(1a) vasopressin receptor (V(1a)R) has been investigated in this study. Using a combination of translation systems that are either glycosylation-competent or do not support glycosylation, we established that of the four putative N-glycosylation sites at Asn(14), Asn(27), Asn(198) and Asn(333) only the first three sites are actually modified by carbohydrate. This was confirmed by disruption of consensus sites by site-directed mutagenesis, individually and in combination. The V(1a)R is not O-glycosylated. The functionality of a series of glycosylation-defective V(1a)R constructs was characterized after expression in HEK 293T cells. It was found that carbohydrate moieties are not required for the receptor to bind any of the four classes of ligand available, or for intracellular signalling. The glycosylation status of the V(1a)R did, however, regulate the level of total receptor expression and also the abundance of receptor at the cell surface. Furthermore, the nature of this regulation (increased or decreased expression) was dictated by the locus of the oligosaccharide modification. Modification of any one of the consensus sites alone, however, was sufficient for wild-type expression, indicating a redundancy within the glycosylation sites. A role for the carbohydrate in the correct folding or stabilization of the V(1a)R is indicated. Glycosylation is not required, however, for efficient trafficking of the receptor to the cell surface. This study establishes the functional importance of N-glycosylation of the V(1a)R.

We studied the role played by the intracellular COOH-terminal region of the human arginine vasopressin (AVP) V1-vascular receptor (V1R) in ligand binding, trafficking, and mitogenic signal transduction in Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with the human AVP receptor cDNA clones that we had isolated previously. Truncations, mutations, or chimeric alterations of the V1R COOH terminus did not alter ligand binding, but agonist-induced V1R internalization and recycling were reduced in the absence of the proximal region of the V(1)R COOH terminus. Coupling to phospholipase C was altered as a function of the COOH-terminal length. Deletion of the proximal portion of the V1R COOH terminus or its replacement by the V2-renal receptor COOH terminus prevented AVP stimulation of DNA synthesis and progression through the cell cycle. Mutation of a kinase consensus motif in the proximal region of the V1R COOH terminus also abolished the mitogenic response. Thus the V1R cytoplasmic COOH terminus is not involved in ligand specificity but is instrumental in receptor trafficking and facilitates the interaction between the intracellular loops of the receptor, G protein, and phospholipase C. It is absolutely required for transmission of the mitogenic action of AVP, probably via a specific kinase phosphorylation site.

Background: The molecular recognition theory predicts that binding domains of peptide hormones and their corresponding receptor binding domains evolved from complementary strands of genomic DNA, and that a process of selective evolutionary mutational events within these primordial domains gave rise to the high affinity and high specificity of peptide hormone-receptor interactions observed today in different peptide hormone-receptor systems. Moreover, this theory has been broadened as a general hypothesis that could explain the evolution of intermolecular protein-protein and intramolecular peptide interactions., Materials and Methods: Applying a molecular cloning strategy based on the molecular recognition theory, we screened a rat kidney cDNA library with a vasopressin (AVP) antisense oligonucleotide probe, expecting to isolate potential AVP receptors., Results: We isolated a rat kidney cDNA encoding a functional V1-type vasopressin receptor. Structural analysis identified a 135 amino acid-long polypeptide with a single transmembrane domain, quite distinct from the rhodopsin-based G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Functional analysis of the expressed V1-type receptor in Cos-1 cells revealed AVP-specific binding, AVP-specific coupling to Ca2+ mobilizing transduction system, and characteristic V1-type antagonist inhibition., Conclusions: This is the second AVP receptor cDNA isolated using AVP antipeptide-based oligonucleotide screening, thus providing compelling evidence in support of the molecular recognition theory as the basis of the evolution of this peptide hormone-receptor system, as well as adds molecular complexity and diversity to AVP receptor systems.

A sequence coding for an arginine vasotocin (AVT) receptor has been identified by the screening of a hepatic cDNA library from the teleost Platichthys flesus. The 2701-bp receptor sequence is predicted to yield a 384-amino acid peptide, analysis of which indicates a seven-transmembrane spanning sequence typical of G-protein-coupled receptors with the N terminus on the outer surface of the cell membrane. Sequence analysis showed this sequence to have a high homology with the Catostomus commersoni AVT receptor (76%) and mammalian vasopressin V(1)-type receptor (62%), but only 55% homology with the C. commersoni isotocin receptor. A two-electrode voltage clamp was used to characterize the receptor expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. AVT induced an inward current which was dose dependent over the range 16.7 fmol to 5 pmol; isotocin was without effect over the same dose range. The mammalian vasopressin V(1)-type receptor agonist ([Phe(2), Orn(8)] oxytocin)() induced an inward current but was less potent than AVT, whereas the mammalian vasopressin V(2)-type receptor agonist ([Deamino(1), Val(4), D-Arg(8)] AVP) was without effect. Injection of oocytes with heparin or BAPTA suppressed the response to AVT, indicating receptor linkage to the phospholipase C-phosphatidylinositol pathway. Northern analysis demonstrated the presence of this AVT receptor mRNA in the brain, kidney, and gill of flounder., (Copyright 2001 Academic Press.)

We have observed an unexpected type of nonreciprocal "cross-regulation" of the agonist-induced endocytosis of G protein-coupled receptors by clathrin-coated pits. Isoproterenol-dependent internalization of beta2-adrenergic receptors in stably transfected HEK293 cells was specifically blocked (>65% inhibition) by vasopressin-induced activation of V2 vasopressin receptors co-expressed at similar levels. In contrast, activation of beta2 receptors caused no detectable effect on V2 receptor internalization in the same cells. Several pieces of evidence suggest that this nonreciprocal inhibition of endocytosis is mediated by receptor-specific intracellular trafficking of beta-arrestins. First, previous studies showed that the activation of V2 but not beta2 receptors caused pronounced recruitment of beta-arrestins to endocytic membranes (Oakley, R. H., Laporte, S. A., Holt, J. A., Barak, L. S., and Caron, M. G. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 32248-32257). Second, overexpression of arrestin 2 or 3 (beta-arrestin 1 or 2) abolished the V2 receptor-mediated inhibition of beta2 receptor internalization. Third, mutations of the V2 receptor that block endomembrane recruitment of beta-arrestins eliminated the V2 receptor-dependent blockade of beta2 receptor internalization. These results identify a novel type of heterologous regulation of G protein-coupled receptors, define a new functional role of receptor-specific intracellular trafficking of beta-arrestins, and suggest an experimental method to rapidly modulate the functional activity of beta-arrestins in intact cells.

The C terminus of the human V2 vasopressin receptor contains multiple phosphorylation sites including a cluster of amino acids that when phosphorylated prevents the return of the internalized receptor to the cell surface. To identify the step where the recycling process was interrupted, the trafficking of the V2 receptor was compared with that of the recycling V1a receptor after exposure to ligand. Initially, both receptors internalized in small peripheral endosomes, but a physical separation of their endocytic pathways was subsequently detected. The V1a receptor remained evenly distributed throughout the cytosol, whereas the V2 receptor accumulated in a large aggregation of vesicles in the proximity of the nucleus where it colocalized with the transferrin receptor and Rab11, a small GTP-binding protein that is concentrated in the perinuclear recycling compartment; only marginal colocalization of Rab11 with the V1a receptor was observed. Thus, the V2 receptor was sequestered in the perinuclear recycling compartment. Targeting to the perinuclear recycling compartment was determined by the receptor subtype and not by the inability to recycle, since the mutation S363A in the phosphorylation-dependent retention signal generated a V2 receptor that was recycled via the same compartment. The perinuclear recycling compartment was enriched in beta-arrestin after internalization of either wild type V2 receptor or its recycling mutant, indicating that long term interaction between the receptors and arrestin was not responsible for the intracellular retention. Thus, the fully phosphorylated retention domain overrides the natural tendency of the V2 receptor to recycle and, by preventing its exit from the perinuclear recycling compartment, interrupts its transit via the "long cycle." The data suggest that the inactivation of the domain, possibly by dephosphorylation, triggers the return of the receptor from the perinuclear compartment to the plasma membrane.

Mutations in the gene of the G protein-coupled vasopressin V2 receptor (V2 receptor) cause X-linked nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI). Most of the missense mutations on the extracellular face of the receptor introduce additional cysteine residues. Several groups have proposed that these residues might disrupt the conserved disulfide bond of the V2 receptor. To test this hypothesis, we first calculated a structure model of the extracellular receptor domains. The model suggests that the additional cysteine residues may form a second disulfide bond with the free, nonconserved extracellular cysteine residue Cys-195 rather than impairing the conserved bond. To address this question experimentally, we used the NDI-causing mutant receptors G185C and R202C. Their Cys-195 residues were replaced by alanine to eliminate the hypothetical second disulfide bonds. This second site mutation led to functional rescue of both NDI-causing mutant receptors, strongly suggesting that the second disulfide bonds are indeed formed. Furthermore we show that residue Cys-195, which is sensitive to "additional cysteine" mutations, is not conserved among the V2 receptors of other species and that the presence of an uneven number of extracellular cysteine residues, as in the human V2 receptor, is rare among class I G protein-coupled receptors.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transducing diverse external signals to cells via activation of heterotrimeric GTP-binding (G) proteins, estimated to mediate actions of 60% of drugs, had been resistant to structure determination until summer 2000. The first atomic-resolution experimental structure of a GPCR, that of dark (inactive) rhodopsin, thus provides a trustworthy 3D prototype for antagonist-bound forms of this huge family of proteins. In this work, our former theoretical GPCR models are evaluated against the new experimental template. Subsequently, a working hypothesis regarding the signal transduction mechanism by GPCRs is presented.

The neurohypophysial hormone arginine vasopressin (AVP) is a cyclic nonpeptide whose actions are mediated by the stimulation of specific G protein--coupled membrane receptors pharmacologically classified into V1-vascular (V1R), V2-renal (V2R) and V3-pituitary (V3R) AVP receptor subtypes. The random screening of chemical compounds and optimization of lead compounds recently resulted in the development of orally active nonpeptide AVP receptor antagonists. Potential therapeutic uses of AVP receptor antagonists include (a) the blockade of V1-vascular AVP receptors in arterial hypertension, congestive heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease; (b) the blockade of V2-renal AVP receptors in the syndrome of inappropriate vasopressin secretion, congestive heart failure, liver cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome and any state of excessive retention of free water and subsequent dilutional hyponatremia; (c) the blockade of V3-pituitary AVP receptors in adrenocorticotropin-secreting tumors. The pharmacological and clinical profile of orally active nonpeptide vasopressin receptor antagonists is reviewed here.

Molecular docking simulations are now fast developing area of research. In this work we describe an effective procedure of preparation of the receptor-ligand complexes. The amino-acid residues involved in ligand binding were identified and described.

The biological effects of arginine vasopressin (AVP) are mediated by three receptor subtypes: the V1a and V1b receptors that activate phospholipases via Gq/11, and the V2 receptor that activates adenylyl cyclase by interacting with Gs. Isolation of the cDNAs encoding the V1a and V1b receptor subtypes explained the tissue variability of V1 antagonist binding, whereas identification of the cDNA and gene encoding the V2 receptor provided the information to identify the mutations responsible for X-linked nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Mutations that abrogate the production and/or release of AVP from the pituitary have diabetes insipidus as their most dramatic manifestation, indicating that the maintenance of water homeostasis is the most important physiological role of this neuropeptide. Evidence for a significant role of AVP in blood pressure control, although actively sought, has been scant.

In order to elucidate the molecular basis and the clinical characteristics of X-linked recessive nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (CNDI) in a kindred of Danish descent, we performed direct sequencing of the arginine vasopressin receptor 2 (AVPR2) gene in five members of the family, as well as clinical investigations comprising a fluid deprivation test and a 1-deamino-8-D-arginine-vasopressin (dDAVP) infusion test in the study subject and his mother. We found a highly unusual, novel, de novo 1447A-->C point mutation (gDNA), involving the invariable splice acceptor of the second intron of the gene in both the affected male (hemizygous) and his mother (heterozygous). This mutation is likely to cause aberrant splicing of the terminal intron of the gene, leading to a non-functional AVP receptor. The clinical studies were consistent with such a hypothesis, as the affected subject had a severe insensitivity to both the antidiuretic and the coagulation factors stimulatory actions of AVP and its analogue dDAVP. Direct sequencing of the AVPR2 is an accurate and rapid diagnostic tool for CNDI and early referral of patients for AVPR2 sequencing is therefore strongly suggested.

In the kidney, water reabsorption is mainly regulated by the binding of arginine vasopressin to vasopressin type 2 (V2) receptors. These receptors are expressed selectively in principal cells of the collecting ducts. To identify molecular mechanisms responsible for the cell-specific expression of the V2 receptor, we have analyzed the proximal promoter of the corresponding gene. We report the identification of a 33-bp enhancer [collecting duct tissue-specific element 1 (CSE1)] that induced high levels of expression of the luciferase reporter gene in three collecting duct cell lines, but not in other renal cell lines. In gel shift assays, CSE1 bound a DNA-binding protein expressed selectively in collecting duct cell lines, and a 7-bp mutation, which abolished the activity of CSE1 in transient transfection experiments, also abolished the binding of this protein. Furthermore, decoy experiments performed using CSE1 showed that this sequence was involved not only in the expression of a construct containing 4.2 kb of the V2 receptor proximal promoter, but also in the expression of the endogenous V2 receptor gene. CSE1 appears to act mostly by counteracting the inhibitory effects of a strong ubiquitous repressor element that we called CIE1. Collectively, these results identify the first functional collecting duct-specific cis-acting element.

The affinity of the nonpeptide antagonist OPC-21268 is greater for the rat V(1) arginine vasopressin (AVP) receptor (V(1)R) than for the human V(1)R. Site-specific mutagenesis was carried out to identify the residues that determine interspecies selectivity for nonpeptide antagonist binding. The introduction of rat amino acids in position 224, 310, 324, or 337 of the human V(1)R sequence dramatically altered OPC-21268 affinity for the receptor, whereas binding of AVP, the peptide V(1)R antagonist d(CH(2))(5)Tyr(Me)AVP, and the nonpeptide V(1)R antagonist SR49059 was not altered by these mutations. Computer modeling explained the mutagenesis results. Docking of OPC-21268 onto a homology-built model of the V(1)R receptor yielded a model for the bound ligand in which the hydrophobic part is deeply embedded in the transmembrane region, whereas the polar part is located on the surface of the extracellular side. The increased affinity of the G337A mutant is due to two additional van der Waals contacts of the alanine methyl group with carbon atoms on the antagonist. The I310V mutant reduces the hydrophobicity in the vicinity of the polar oxygen atom of the antagonist. The I224V mutant relieves overcrowding in a hydrophobic binding pocket involving the aromatic residues Trp(175), Phe(179), Phe(307), and Trp(304). Finally, the E324D mutant enables the formation of a hydrogen bond of the carboxylate side chain with the amide side chain of Gln(311), which in turn forms a hydrogen bond with the N57 nitrogen atom of OPC-21268. Thus, a few residues, distinct from those involved in agonist binding, control interspecies selectivity toward OPC-21268 nonpeptide antagonist binding.

Despite their opposite effects on signal transduction, the nonapeptide hormone arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and its V1a receptor-selective cyclic peptide antagonist d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP display homologous primary structures, differing only at residues 1 and 2. These structural similarities led us to hypothesize that both ligands could interact with the same binding pocket in the V1a receptor. To determine receptor residues responsible for discriminating binding of agonist and antagonist ligands, we performed site-directed mutagenesis of conserved aromatic and hydrophilic residues as well as nonconserved residues, all located in the transmembrane binding pocket of the V1a receptor. Mutation of aromatic residues of transmembrane region VI (W304, F307, F308) reduced affinity for the d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP and markedly decreased affinity for the unrelated strongly hydrophobic V1a-selective nonpeptide antagonist SR 49059. Replacement of these aromatic residues had no effect on AVP binding, but increased AVP-induced coupling efficacy of the receptor for its G protein. Mutating hydrophilic residues Q108, K128 and Q185 in transmembrane regions II, III and IV, respectively, led to a decrease in affinity for both agonists and antagonists. Finally, the nonconserved residues T333 and A334 in transmembrane region VII, controlled the V1a/V2 binding selectivity for both nonpeptide and cyclic peptide antagonists. Thus, because conserved aromatic residues of the V1a receptor binding pocket seem essential for antagonists and do not contribute at all to the binding of agonists, we propose that these residues differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding.

X-Linked nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) is a rare inherited disorder characterized by the excretion of abnormal large volumes of diluted urine mainly caused by mutations in the V2 vasopressin receptor (AVPR2) gene. By screening NDI patients for mutations within the AVPR2 gene we have identified three novel (I46K, F105V, I130F) and four recurrent (D85N, R106C, R113W, Q225X) mutations. In addition, a recurrent missense mutation (A147T) within the aquaporin-2 gene was identified in a female patient with autosomal recessive NDI associated with sensorineural deafness. Selected clinical data of the NDI patients were compared with the results from the in vitro studies. Functional analysis of I46K and I130F revealed reduced maximum agonist-induced cAMP responses as a result of an improper cell surface targeting. In contrast, the F105V mutation is delivered to the cell surface and displayed an unchanged maximum cAMP response, but impaired ligand binding abilities of F105V were reflected in a shifted concentration-response curve toward higher vasopressin concentrations. As the extracellularly located F105 is highly conserved among the vasopressin/oxytocin receptor family, functional analysis of this residue implicates an important role in high affinity agonist binding.

Although it is now widely accepted that G-protein-coupled receptors exist in at least two allosteric states, inactive and active, and that the spontaneous equilibrium between the two is regulated by various events including the binding of specific agonists and antagonists, the molecular counterparts of these functionally different states are still poorly understood. In this paper, we review our current knowledge concerning the structure-function relationships of the oxytocin and vasopressin receptors, focusing in particular on the process of receptor activation. Using a combined approach of site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modelling, we investigated the molecular events leading to agonist-dependent and -independent receptor activation in the human oxytocin receptor. Our analysis allows us to propose that the active conformations of this receptor are characterised by similar rearrangements of its cytosolic regions that ultimately lead to the opening of a putative docking site for the G-protein. Furthermore, the dynamics of these motions are similar to that observed in the alpha1B-adrenergic receptor, thus suggesting that, although activated by different ligands, the process of receptor isomerization in these two receptors is regulated by the same cluster of highly conserved residues and that common molecular events are responsible for receptor activation in different G-protein-coupled receptors.

We have previously shown a conserved glutamate/dileucine motif ((335)ELRSLL(340)) in the intracellular C terminus of the vasopressin V(2) receptor (V(2) receptor) to be essential for receptor transport from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the Golgi apparatus. The motif may represent a transport signal that is recognized by a component of ER to Golgi vesicles. Alternatively, it may be necessary for transport-competent receptor folding to pass the quality-control system of the ER. To assess these two possibilities, we constructed a receptor fragment that allows transport studies independent of full-length receptor folding. Transmembrane domains II-VII were deleted, thereby fusing the intracellular C terminus to the first cytoplasmic loop. The mutations that impaired transport of the full-length receptor were introduced, and receptor fragments were localized in transiently transfected HEK 293 cells. All mutant receptor fragments were detectable at the plasma membrane, demonstrating that the glutamate/dileucine motif does not function as a small, linear vesicular transport signal. Instead, our data strongly suggest that this motif is required for transport-competent folding of the full-length receptor. To assess the underlying conformational features, a three-dimensional homology model of the V(2) receptor was computed. Our model predicts that the glutamate/dileucine motif contributes to a U-like loop within the intracellular C terminus. Residue Leu(339) may be required for folding back the intracellular C terminus to residue Leu(62) of the first cytoplasmic loop. We characterized the naturally occurring L62P and DeltaL62-R64 mutations in the first cytoplasmic loop and show that they lead to transport-defective full-length V(2) receptors that are retained in the ER, consistent with the structure model.

Polydipsic mice, STR/N, which show extreme polydipsia and polyuria, were discovered in 1958. In the STR/N, urine outputs are much higher than in control mice. The possibility of an abnormal regulation of the arginine vasopressin (AVP) system, or an abnormality in the renal susceptibility to AVP, should be considered. In this study we investigated the AVP system and water regulation in STR/N. We sequenced the AVP and the AVP V(2)-receptor genes of the STR/N by direct sequencing. No mutation was found in either of them. AVP gene expression examined by in situ hybridization and plasma sodium in 8-wk-old STR/N was significantly lower than in control mice, whereas it was significantly higher at 20 wk. Renal sensitivity to injected AVP was attenuated in 20-wk-old STR/N. The suppression of AVP synthesis due to excessive water retention in 8-wk-old STR/N suggests that polydipsia may be the primary cause in this strain. The 20-wk-old STR/N became dehydrated with the acceleration of AVP synthesis, which might have resulted from secondary desensitization to AVP.

Previous studies have established that G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are composed of independent folding domains. Based on this findings we attempted to rescue the function of clinically relevant missense mutations (R137H, S167L, and R181C) within the N-terminal domain of the V2 vasopressin receptor (V2-R), by coexpressing mutated full-length (Y280C) and C-terminally truncated (E242X) receptor constructs in COS-7 cells. Coimmunoprecipitation and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay studies demonstrated a specific association of E242X with full-length V2-Rs even in the presence of missense mutations. Systematic analysis of the structural requirements for the observed receptor/fragment association showed that N-terminal fragments containing at least transmembrane regions 1-3 interact with the full-length V2-R. Despite this specific interaction, no functional reconstitution was achieved for mutant V2-Rs following coexpression with E242X and Y280C. However, functional activity of R137H and R181C upon coexpression with E242X was regained by mutational disruption of the extracellular disulfide bond, which is highly conserved among GPCRs. Our data with the V2-R are consistent with a structural model in which class I GPCRs form contact oligomers by lateral interaction rather than by a domain-swapping mechanism.

A non-peptide, vasopressin V1a receptor-selective antagonist, OPC-21268, exhibited a markedly higher affinity for the rat V1a receptor (Ki = 380 nM) than for the human V1a receptor (Ki = 140 microM). To delineate the region responsible for the high affinity binding of OPC-21268 for the rat V1a receptor, we have constructed a series of chimeric human and rat V1a receptors, and examined the chimeric and point-mutated receptors by competitive radioligand binding analysis. The results showed that the transmembrane domain (TMD) VI-VII of the vasopressin V1a receptor, in particular the amino acid residue Ala-342 in TMD VII, is the major component conferring the rat-selective binding of OPC-21268 to the V1a receptor.

The G protein-coupled vasopressin V2 receptor (V2 receptor) contains a pair of conserved cysteine residues (C112 and C192) which are thought to form a disulfide bond between the first and second extracellular loops. The conserved cysteine residues were found to be important for the correct formation of the ligand binding domain of some G protein-coupled receptors. Here we have assessed the properties of the V2 receptor after site-directed mutagenesis of its conserved cysteine residues in transiently transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) cells. Mutant receptors (C112S, C112A and C192S, C192A) were non-functional and located mostly in the cell's interior. The conserved cysteine residues of the V2 receptor are thus not only important for the structure of the ligand binding domain but also for efficient intracellular receptor transport. In addition to the functional significance of the conserved cysteine residues, we have also analyzed the defects of two mutant V2 receptors which cause X-linked nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) by the introduction of additional cysteine residues into the second extracellular loop (mutants G185C, R202C). These mutations are assumed to impair normal disulfide bond formation. Mutant receptor G185C and R202C were efficiently transported to the plasma membrane but were defective in ligand binding. Only in the case of the mutant receptor R202C, the more sensitive adenylyl cyclase activity assay revealed vasopressin-stimulated cAMP formation with a 35-fold increased EC(50) value and with a reduced EC(max), indicating that ligand binding is not completely abolished. Taking the unaffected intracellular transport of both NDI-causing mutant receptors into account, our results indicate that the observed impairment of ligand binding by the additional cysteine residues is not due to the prevention of disulfide bond formation between the conserved cysteine residues.

In chickens, oviposition is correlated with increased plasma levels of the neurohypophysial hormone vasotocin, and vasotocin stimulates contraction of uterine strips in vitro. A gene encoding a vasotocin receptor subtype that we have designated the VT1 receptor was cloned from the domestic chicken. The open reading frame encodes a 370-amino acid polypeptide that displays seven segments of hydrophobic amino acids, typical of guanine nucleotide-protein-coupled receptors. Other structural features of the VT1 receptor include two potential N-linked glycosylation sites in the extracellular N-terminal region, a conserved aspartic acid in transmembrane domain 2 that is found in nearly all guanine nucleotide-protein-coupled receptors, and two potential protein kinase C phosphorylation sites in the third intracellular loop and C-terminal tail. Expressed VT1 receptors in COS7 cells bind neurohypophysial hormones with the following rank order of potency: vasotocin congruent with vasopressin > oxytocin congruent with mesotocin > isotocin. In addition, the expressed VT1 receptor mediates vasotocin-induced phosphatidylinositol turnover and Ca(2+) mobilization. In the chicken, expression of VT1 receptor gene transcripts is limited to the shell gland (uterus) and the brain. Thus, the VT1 receptor that we have cloned may mediate contractions of the shell gland during oviposition and activate reproductive behaviors known to be stimulated by vasotocin in lower vertebrates.

The ligand-induced proteolytic cleavage of the V2 vasopressin receptor transiently expressed in COS cells was investigated. After incubation of the cell membranes with a photoreactive ligand possessing full agonistic properties for V2 receptors, approximately 90% of the porcine and bovine V2 vasopressin receptors were cleaved in the upper part of transmembrane helix 2 at a heptapeptide sequence conserved in both vasopressin and oxytocin receptors. The oxytocin receptor was completely resistant to proteolysis after binding the same photoreactive ligand, which is only a partial agonist for this receptor. Chimeric V2/oxytocin receptors obtained by transfer of extracellular domains of the oxytocin receptor into the V2 receptor showed an increase in binding affinity for oxytocin versus vasopressin and a diminished cleavage. The proteolysis-resistant chimeric V2/oxytocin receptor, which contains the first three extracellular domains of the oxytocin receptor, stimulated cAMP accumulation to a larger extent in response to vasopressin than the wild-type receptor and showed impaired desensitization of the adenylate cyclase system. Our data indicate that the proteolytic cleavage of the V2 receptor requires a defined conformation, especially of the first two extracellular domains that is induced by agonist binding. Furthermore, the results suggest that the proteolytic V2 receptor cleavage might play a role in signal termination at elevated hormone concentrations.

The structural requirements for internalization and signalling of the vasopressin V1a receptor were investigated in stably transfected HEK-293 cells. Removal of the 51 C-terminal amino acids did not affect vasopressin binding, calcium signalling, heterologous desensitization or internalization of the receptor. Deletion of 14 additional amino acids reduced vasopressin-dependent calcium increase and impaired receptor internalization. Substitution of cysteines 371-372 did not affect intracellular signalling, but decreased endocytosis by 26%. Substitution of the 361-362 leucine by alanine residues reduced by 56% V1a receptor sequestration without affecting calcium signalling. These results indicate that di-cysteine and mostly di-leucine motifs present in the C-terminal region of the V1a receptor are involved in its internalization.

A 56-year-old Japanese woman with congenital nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (CNDI) is reported. She was diagnosed with CNDI accompanied by advanced gastric cancer. After total gastrectomy, approximately 500 ml fluid per hour was necessary to prevent dehydration. Urinary volume was decreased by administration of hydrochlorothiazide. We detected a novel mutation in the vasopressin V2 receptor gene of her chromosomal DNA. A substitution from G to A was found at the 631 nucleotide position, altering codon 12 from glycine (GGG) to glutamic acid (GAG) in the first extracellular domain. This missense mutation appeared to be the cause of her resistance to arginine vasopressin.

The human V2 vasopressin receptor contains one consensus site for N-linked glycosylation at asparagine 22 in the predicted extracellular amino terminal segment of the protein. This segment also contains clusters of serines and threonines that are potential sites for O-glycosylation. Mutagenesis of asparagine 22 to glutamine abolished N-linked glycosylation of the V2 receptor (N22Q-V2R), without altering its function or level of expression. The N22Q-V2R expressed in transfected cells migrated in denaturing acrylamide gels as two protein bands with a difference of 7000 Da. Protein labeling experiments demonstrated that the faster band could be chase to the slower one suggesting the presence of O-linked sugars. Sialidase treatment of membranes from cells expressing the N22Q-V2R or of immunoprecipitated metabolically labeled V2R accelerated the migration of the protein in acrylamide gels demonstrating the existence of O-glycosylation, the first time this type of glycosylation has been found in a G protein coupled receptor. Synthesis of metabolically labeled receptor in the presence of 1 mM phenyl-N-acetyl-alpha-D-galactosaminide, a competitive inhibitor of N-acetyl-alpha-D-galactose and N-acetylneuraminic acid transferases, also produced a receptor that migrated faster in denaturing gels. Serines and threonines present in the amino terminus were analyzed by alanine scanning mutagenesis to identify the acceptor sites. O-glycosylation was found at most serines and threonines present in the amino terminus. Because the disappearance of a site opened the availability of others to the transferases, the exact identification of the acceptor sites was not feasible. The wild type V2R expressed in HEK 293, COS, or MDCK cells underwent N- and O-linked glycosylation. The mutant V2R bearing all serine/threonine substitutions by alanine at the amino terminus yielded a receptor functionally indistinguishable from the wild type protein, whose mobility in polyacrylamide gels was no longer affected by sialidase treatment.

Molecular dynamics simulations were carried out for a V2 receptor (V2R) model embedded in a dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) bilayer. Both free and ligand-bound states of V2R were modeled. Our initial V2R model was obtained using a rule-based automated method for GPCR modeling and refined using constrained simulated annealing in vacuo. The docking site of the native vasopressin ligand was selected and justified upon consideration of ligand-receptor interactions and structure-activity data. The primary purpose of this work was to investigate the usefulness of MD simulation of an integral membrane protein like a GPCR receptor, upon inclusion of a carefully parameterized surrounding lipid membrane and water. Physical properties of the system were evaluated and compared with the fully hydrated pure DMPC bilayer membrane. The solvation interactions, individual lipid-protein interaction and fluctuations of the protein, the lipid, and water were analyzed in detail. As expected, the membrane-spanning helices of the protein fluctuate less than the peripheral loops do. The protein appears to disturb the local lipid structure. Simulations were carried out using AMBER 4.1 package upon constant number-pressure-temperature (NPT) conditions on massively parallel computers Cray T3E and IBM SP2.

We have previously provided evidence that an autocrine loop involving vasopressin is present in perhaps all breast cancers. This study now shows MCF-7 breast cancer cells express mRNAs for all currently recognized vasopressin receptor subtypes (V1a, V1b, and V2). Cloning and DNA sequencing over the entire open reading frame of each mRNA revealed that normal sequences representing each receptor were present. However, in addition, an abnormal mRNA for the V2 receptor, expected to give rise to a truncated 'diabetic' protein, was also expressed. Western analysis revealed that all three normal mRNAs gave rise to proteins of sizes compatible with them being functional receptors. The abnormal V2 receptor mRNA also gave rise to proteins.

Three-dimensional models of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) have been defined using most experimental data available and protein modeling techniques. The endogenous ligand binding sites have been qualitatively described and putative receptor activation mechanisms have been proposed. The model has been recently refined to take into account recent crystallographic data. Most experimental results published are in excellent qualitative agreement with the initial model. We have undertaken to study more systematically by site directed mutagenesis the vasopressin/oxytocin receptor binding domain as a prototype of neuropeptide receptors. The experimental results are in very good agreement with the models. The residues responsible for the neuropeptide binding have been identified and confirm the predicted localization of the neuromediator in the transmembrane domain of the receptors. The side chain of the 8th residue of vasopressin interacts with a non-conserved receptor residue located in the first extracellular loop. As predicted from the model, this interaction is completely responsible for the selectivity of the ligand-receptor interaction. Finally, aromatic residues which allow the modulation of the efficacy of agonists have been identified.

To improve our understanding of the functional architecture of G protein-coupled receptors, we have taken advantage of differences among mammalian species in ligand binding to search for the rat versus human selectivity determinants of the V2 vasopressin receptor and of its peptide ligands. Our data indicate that residue 2 of species-selective peptide antagonists such as d(CH2)5-[D-Ile2,Ile4, Tyr-NH29]arginine vasopressin controls their rat versus human selectivity. For species-selective agonists such as desmopressin, residues 1 and 8 modulate the binding selectivity. Among residues different between rat and human V2 receptors, those localized in the upper part of the human V2 receptor have been substituted with their rat V2 homologs. Pharmacological analysis of mutant receptors revealed that residues 202 and 304 fully control the species selectivity of the discriminating antagonists in an independent and additive manner. A third residue (position 100) is necessary to observe an equivalent phenomenon for the discriminating agonists. The substitution of these three residues does not modify the affinity of the nonselective agonists and antagonists. In conclusion, extracellular loops and the top of the transmembrane domains of V2 vasopressin receptors may provide the molecular basis for peptide ligand-binding species selectivity. Very few residues in these regions may control the binding mode of both agonists and antagonists.

The regulation of water excretion by the kidney is one of the few physiologic processes that are prominent in everyday life. This process predominantly occurs in renal collecting duct cells, where transcellular water reabsorption is induced after binding of the pituitary hormone arginine-vasopressin to its vasopressin type-2 receptor and the subsequent insertion of aquaporin-2 (AQP2) water channels in the apical membrane of these cells. Removal of the hormone triggers endocytosis of AQP2 and restores the water-impermeable state of the collecting duct cells. Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus is characterized by the inability of the kidney to concentrate urine in response to vasopressin; the vasopressin type-2 receptor and the AQP2 water channel have both been shown to be involved in this disease. This article focuses on mutations in the vasopressin V2 receptor and aquaporin-2 water channel identified in nephrogenic diabetes insipidus patients, and on the effects of these mutations on the transport and function of these proteins upon expression in cell systems.

The molecular mechanisms governing the coupling selectivity of G protein-coupled receptors activated by peptide ligands are not well understood. To shed light on this issue, we have used the Gq/11-linked V1a and the Gs-coupled V2 vasopressin peptide receptors as model systems. To explore the structural basis underlying the ability of the V2 receptor to selectively recognize Gs, we systematically substituted distinct V2 receptor segments (or single amino acids) into the V1a receptor and studied whether the resulting hybrid receptors gained the ability to mediate hormone-dependent cAMP production. This strategy appeared particularly attractive since hormone stimulation of the V1a receptor has virtually no effect on intracellular cAMP levels. Functional analysis of a large number of mutant receptors transiently expressed in COS-7 cells indicated that the presence of V2 receptor sequence at the N terminus of the third intracellular loop is critical for efficient activation of Gs. More detailed mutational analysis of this receptor region showed that two polar V2 receptor residues, Gln225 and Glu231, play key roles in Gs recognition. In addition, a short sequence at the N terminus of the cytoplasmic tail was found to make an important contribution to V2 receptor/Gs coupling selectivity. We also made the novel observation that the efficiency of V2 receptor/Gs coupling can be modulated by the length of the central portion of the third intracellular loop (rather than the specific amino acid sequence within this domain). These findings provide novel insights into the molecular mechanisms regulating peptide receptor/G protein coupling selectivity.

The V2 vasopressin renal receptor (V2R), which controls antidiuresis in mammals, is a member of the large family of heptahelical transmembrane (7TM) G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Using the automated GPCR modeling facility available via Internet (http:/(/)expasy.hcuge.ch/swissmod/SWISS-MODEL.+ ++html) for construction of the 7TM domain in accord with the bovine rhodopsin (RD) footprint, and the SYBYL software for addition of the intra- and extracellular domains, the human V2R was modeled. The structure was further refined and its conformational variability tested by the use of a version of the Constrained Simulated Annealing (CSA) protocol developed in this laboratory. An inspection of the resulting structure reveals that the V2R (likewise any GPCR modeled this way) is much thicker and accordingly forms a more spacious TM cavity than most of the hitherto modeled GPCR constructs do, typically based on the structure of bacteriorhodopsin (BRD). Moreover, in this model the 7TM helices are arranged differently than they are in any BRD-based model. Thus, the topology and geometry of the TM cavity, potentially capable of receiving ligands, is in this model quite different than it is in the earlier models. In the subsequent step, two ligands, the native [arginine8]vasopressin (AVP) and the selective agonist [D-arginine8]vasopressin (DAVP) were inserted, each in two topologically non-equivalent ways, into the TM cavity and the resulting structures were equilibrated and their conformational variabilities tested using CSA as above. The best docking was selected and justified upon consideration of ligand-receptor interactions and structure-activity data. Finally, the amino acid residues were indicated, mainly in TM helices 3-7, as potentially important in both AVP and DAVP docking. Among those Cys112, Val115-Lys116, Gln119, Met123 in helix 3; Glu174 in helix 4; Val206, Ala210, Val213-Phe214 in helix 5; Trp284, Phe287-Phe288, Gln291 in helix 6; and Phe307, Leu310, Ala314 and Asn317 in helix 7 appeared to be the most important ones. Many of these residues are invariant for either the GPCR superfamily or the neurophyseal (vasopressin V2R, V1aR and V1bR and oxytocin OR) subfamily of receptors. Moreover, some of the equivalent residues in V1aR have already been found critical for the ligand affinity.

The V1a arginine vasopressin receptor (V1aR) expressed in HEK 293 cells was phosphorylated after binding to arginine vasopressin (AVP). The phosphate was incorporated very rapidly into the protein but remained attached for a very short time despite the continuous presence of hormone. The extent of phosphorylation depended upon the concentration of AVP suggesting the involvement of G-protein-coupled receptor kinases. Protein kinase C (PKC) contributed to V1aR phosphorylation as demonstrated by the fact that inhibition of the kinase decreased the amount of phosphate incorporated into the receptor. However, PKC activity was not responsible for the transient nature of V1aR phosphorylation. The hormone-free receptor could be phosphorylated by phorbol ester-activated PKC. Although the phosphorylation was transient, the phosphate groups incorporated remained on the receptor protein longer than those incorporated after AVP treatment. PKC phosphorylation of unoccupied V1aR was not sufficient to promote sequestration. Vasopressin also promoted sequestration of about 80% of the surface receptor, but measurements of the rate of accumulation of inositol phosphates in the sustained presence of the ligand did not reveal a significant desensitization of coupling to phospholipase C activity. The addition of a V1aR antagonist inhibited the sustained accumulation of inositol phosphates establishing that the sustained stimulation of PLC was mediated by receptors located on the cell surface. The transient character of V1aR phosphorylation seemed intrinsic to the receptor protein rather than a consequence of signaling within the cell, and receptor sequestration appeared to be responsible for the desensitization observed in HEK 293 cells.