Search

To the editor: Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a Philadelphia chromosome–negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by persistent thrombocytosis, excessive bone marrow megakaryocyte proliferation, and normal erythrocyte mass.[1][1] Symptoms may include bone pain, pruritus, night

Recently reported mature survival data have confirmed the favorable prognosis in polycythemia vera (PV), with an estimated median survival of 24 years, in patients younger than age 60 years old. Currently available drugs for PV have not been shown to prolong survival or alter the natural history of the disease and are instead indicated primarily for prevention of thrombosis. Unfortunately, study endpoints that are being utilized in currently ongoing clinical trials in PV do not necessarily target clinically or biologically relevant outcomes, such as thrombosis, survival, or morphologic remission, and are instead focused on components of disease palliation. Even more discouraging has been the lack of critical appraisal from “opinion leaders”, on the added value of newly approved drugs. Keeping these issues in mind, at present, we continue to advocate conservative management in low-risk PV (phlebotomy combined with once- or twice-daily aspirin therapy) and include cytoreductive therapy in “high-risk” patients; in the latter regard, our first, second, and third line drugs of choice are hydroxyurea, pegylated interferon-α and busulfan, respectively. In addition, it is reasonable to consider JAK2 inhibitor therapy, in the presence of protracted pruritus or markedly enlarged splenomegaly shown to be refractory to the aforementioned drugs.

The use of Hydroxyurea (HU) as first line therapy in polycythemia vera (PV) has been criticized because no solid demonstration that this drug prevents thrombosis or prolongs survival has been so far produced. Here we present the outcomes of a large cohort of patients with PV included in the European Collaborative Low-dose Aspirin (ECLAP) study. We selected 1,042 patients who, during the follow-up, had received only phlebotomy (PHL) or HU to maintain the hematocrit level

The purpose of the study was to assess consensus and interobserver agreement among an international panel of six hematopathologists regarding characterization and reproducibility of bone marrow (BM) histologic features used to diagnose early stage myeloproliferative neoplasms, in particular differentiation of so-called masked/prodromal polycythemia vera (mPV) from JAK2-mutated essential thrombocythemia (ET). The six members of the hematopathology panel evaluated 98 BM specimens independently and in a blinded fashion without knowledge of clinical data. The specimens included 48 cases of mPV according to the originally published hemoglobin threshold values for this entity (male: 16.0-18.4 g/dL, female: 15.0-16.4 g/dL), 31 cases with overt PV according to the updated 2016 WHO criteria, and 19 control cases. The latter group included cases of JAK2-mutated ET, primary myelofibrosis, myelodysplastic syndrome, and various reactive conditions. Inter-rater agreement between the panelists was very high (overall agreement 92.6%, kappa 0.812), particularly with respect to separating mPV from ET. Virtually all cases of mPV were correctly classified as PV according to their BM morphology. In conclusion, a central blinded review of histology slides by six hematopathologists demonstrated that highly reproducible specific histological pattern characterize PV and confirmed the notion that there are no significant differences between mPV and overt PV in relation to BM morphology.

Objective To determine the financial and psycho-social impact of participation in clinical trials of patients with BCR/ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Methods An international, observational cross section study was performed in 143 consecutive MPN patients (51% myelofibrosis, 36% polycythemia vera, 13% essential thrombocythemia), 68% from Italy, 17% from USA, and 15% from Spain. Results Thirty-five percent of patients reported having spent more money during the trial than in previous treatments and 21% having missed more workdays. Twelve percent replied that they would not have participated in the trial if the financial consequences would have been known beforehand. In 10% of the patients, the interpersonal relationships were more affected during the trial than in previous treatment but, overall, 91% subjects believed that participating in the clinical trial was worth the financial or emotional suffering. Concerning patients’ suggestions, 54% of them indicated that the number of visits required for the trial should be clearly specified in the informed consent, 60% recommended travel cost reimbursement and 23% hotel cost reimbursement. Conclusions Physicians and pharmaceutical companies involved in clinical trials with patients with hematological diseases should be aware of these problems and make efforts to attenuate the socio-economic burden of participation in the trials. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with progressive cytopenias and high symptom burden. MF patients with thrombocytopenia have poor prognosis but the presence of thrombocytopenia frequently precludes the use of JAK2 inhibitors. In this study, we assessed quality of life and symptom burden in 418 MF patients with (n = 89) and without (n = 329) thrombocytopenia using prospective data from the MPN-QOL study group database, including the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) and Total Symptom Score (MPN10). Thrombocytopenia, defined as platelet count 9/L (moderate 51–100 × 109/L; severe ≤50 × 109/L), was associated with anemia (76% vs. 45%, p < 0.001), leukopenia (29% vs. 11%, p < 0.001), and need for red blood cell transfusion (35% vs. 19%, p = 0.002). Thrombocytopenic patients had more fatigue, early satiety, inactivity, dizziness, sad mood, cough, night sweats, itching, fever, and weight loss; total symptom scores were also higher (33 vs. 24, p < 0.001). Patients with severe thrombocytopenia were more likely to have anemia (86% vs. 67%, p = 0.04), leukopenia (40% vs. 20%, p = 0.04), and transfusion requirements (51% vs. 20%, p = 0.002) but few differences in symptoms when compared to patients with moderate thrombocytopenia. These results suggest that MF patients with thrombocytopenia experience greater symptomatic burden than MF patients without thrombocytopenia and may benefit from additional therapies.

The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms defines 2 stages of primary myelofibrosis (PMF): prefibrotic/early (pre-PMF) and overt fibrotic (overt PMF) phase. In this work, we studied the clinical and molecular features of patients belonging to these categories of PMF. The diagnosis of 661 PMF patients with a bone marrow biopsy at presentation was revised according to modern criteria; clinical information and annotation of somatic mutations in both driver and selected nondriver myeloid genes were available for all patients. Compared with pre-PMF, overt PMF was enriched in patients with anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, higher blast count, symptoms, large splenomegaly, and unfavorable karyotype. The different types of driver mutations were similarly distributed between the 2 categories, whereas selected mutations comprising the high mutation risk (HMR) category (any mutations in ASXL1, SRSF2, IDH1/2, EZH2) were more represented in overt PMF. More patients with overt PMF were in higher International Prognostic Scoring System risk categories at diagnosis, and the frequency increased during follow-up, suggesting greater propensity to disease progression compared with pre-PMF. Median survival was significantly shortened in overt PMF (7.2 vs 17.6 years), with triple negativity for driver mutations and presence of HMR mutations representing independent predictors of unfavorable outcome. The findings of this "real-life" study indicate that adherence to 2016 WHO criteria allows for identification of 2 distinct categories of patients with PMF where increased grades of fibrosis are associated with more pronounced disease manifestations, adverse mutation profile, and worse outcome, overall suggesting they might represent a phenotypic continuum.

Purpose of review Venous thromboembolism is frequent in chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). The current strategy for its management includes cytoreductive therapy and antithrombotic prophylaxis, but many issues remain uncertain. In this review, the risk factors and prevention of recurrences will be discussed. Recent findings Around one-third of patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia experience a major thrombosis at diagnosis or during follow-up. According to the European Leukemia Net guidelines, these patients must be included in the high-risk group for thrombotic recurrence and should be treated with cytoreduction and antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs in the presence of arterial or venous thrombosis, respectively. Despite this treatment, the annual incidence of recurrence after the first venous thrombosis varies from 4.2 to 6.5% on vitamin K-antagonists and is doubled after discontinuation. The highest incidence of recurrence occurs after cerebral and hepatic vein thrombosis (8.8 and 8 per 100 pt-years, respectively). The occurrence of major bleeding on vitamin K-antagonists is similar to a non-MPN population and accounts for a rate of 1.8-2.4 per 100 pt-years. Summary After venous thrombosis, the incidence of recurrence in MPN remains elevated, which suggested there was a need to review the current recommendations of primary and secondary prophylaxis.

In patients who do not meet the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for overt polycythaemia vera (PV), a diagnosis of masked PV (mPV) can be determined. A fraction of mPV patients may display thrombocytosis, thus mimicking essential thrombocythaemia (ET). No previous studies have examined clinical outcomes of mPV among young JAK2-mutated patients. We analysed a retrospective cohort of 538 JAK2-mutated patients younger than 40 years, after a re-assessment of the diagnosis according to the haemoglobin threshold for mPV. In this cohort of patients, 97 (18%) met the WHO criteria for PV, 66 patients (12%) were classified as mPV and 375 (70%) as JAK2-mutated ET. Surprisingly, a significant difference in the incidence of thrombosis was found when comparing mPV versus overt PV patients (P = 0·04). In multivariate analysis, the only factor accounting for the difference in the risk of thrombosis was the less frequent use of phlebotomies and cytoreduction in mPV patients compared to those with overt PV. Thus, we emphasize the need for the identification of mPV in young JAK2-mutated patients in order to optimize their treatments. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

To investigate the characteristics and clinical course of cerebral vein thrombosis (CVT) in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) we compared 48 patients with MPN and CVT (group MPN-CVT) to 87 with MPN and other venous thrombosis (group MPN-VT) and 178 with MPN and no thrombosis (group MPN-NoT) matched by sex, age at diagnosis of MPN (±5 years) and type of MPN. The study population was identified among 5,500 patients with MPN, from January 1982 to June 2013. Thrombophilia abnormalities were significantly more prevalent in the MPN-CVT and MPN-VT than in MPN-NoT group (P = 0.015), as well as the JAK2 V617F mutation in patients with essential thrombocythemia (P = 0.059). Compared to MPN-VT, MPN-CVT patients had a higher rate of recurrent thrombosis (42% vs. 25%, P = 0.049) despite a shorter median follow-up period (6.1 vs. 10.3 years, P = 0.019), a higher long-term antithrombotic (94% vs. 84%, P = 0.099) and a similar cytoreductive treatment (79% vs. 70%, P = 0.311). The incidence of recurrent thrombosis was double in MPN-CVT than in MPN-VT group (8.8% and 4.2% patient-years, P = 0.022), and CVT and unprovoked event were the only predictive variables in a multivariate model including also sex, blood count, thrombophilia, cytoreductive, and antithrombotic treatment (HR 1.97, 95%CI 1.05-3.72 and 2.09, 1.09-4.00, respectively).

Although Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) occur typically in middle to advanced age, any age group may be affected, posing a challenge for their management during pregnancy when they occur in young females. There is a high incidence of thromboembolic events and pregnancy complications in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, and a possible relationship between these complications is a matter of concern. The aim of this article was to correlate thrombosis and pregnancy outcome in 158 females with ET experiencing 237 pregnancies. Seven patients had a thrombotic event before their first pregnancy, one of them ended (14.3%) in a miscarriage. Among the 151 patients with no history of thrombosis before they became pregnant, 40 (26.5%) had a miscarriage (P = NS). Eighteen patients (11.4%) developed major thrombotic complications (12 splanchnic vein, 1 cerebral vein, 2 coronary syndromes, and 3 strokes) after at least one pregnancy (4 uneventful and 14 complicated). The occurrence of thrombosis was significantly more frequent (P < 0.001) in patients with a history of pregnancy complications (28%) than in those experiencing a normal pregnancy and delivery (3.7%). Pregnancy complications in women with ET are associated with a higher risk of subsequent thromboses, so pregnant women with this neoplasm who miscarry need to be carefully monitored.

Polycythemia vera (PV) is currently diagnosed by the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria regarding hemoglobin (HB) levels and JAK2V617F and related mutations or by the British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH) guidelines predominantly based on hematocrit (HCT) values (>52% in men and >48% in women) in JAK2 mutated patients. We examined clinical features at diagnosis and outcome in 397 mutated PV patients showing a bone marrow (BM) morphology conforming with the WHO descriptions but including also cases with a HB level 65 years and white blood cell count >15 × 10(9) /L. Without these risk factors mPV patients had the same survival as overt PV suggesting that a fraction of patients with HB lower than that required for WHO diagnosis should still be considered as overt PV. This study has established the existence of mPV by two different classification systems based on either HB or HCT threshold values.

Background: A myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) is frequent underlying cause of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT). We reported that ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, was safe in patients (pts) with MPN-associated SVT and effective in reducing spleen size at the planned primary analysis at 24 weeks (w) in an investigator-initiated phase II clinical trial (Pieri L, AJH 2016). Herein we present final long term follow up (FU) data. Methods. A total of 21 MPN-SVT entered the trial in 2012. Pts who completed the 24w core study and well tolerated the drug and had evidence of clinically-significant improvement were allowed to enter an extension phase up to w72, then entered a long term FU. The drug was provided by Novartis, that had no role in trial design nor in data analysis. Safety data were reported as cumulative incidence of adverse events (CTCAE v4.03). Clinical responses were defined according to ELN and IWG-MRT criteria. Results. Patients disposition. Eighteen patients were alive at last follow-up at a median of 5.5y, range 3.7-6.5y. Two pts died before w72 (hepatocarcinoma; unknown cause), 1 pt died at w252 (sepsis). Diagnosis of the 18 pts was: PMF 8 (44%), PV 5 (28%), ET 4 (22%), PET-MF 1 (6%). The DIPSS risk score of the 8 pts with PMF was low in 4 and intermediate-1 in 4. At last FU, 14 patients are still on ruxolitinib (78%), 10 pts still on clinical trial, 4 pts shifted to commercial drug. Four pts (22%) withdrawn treatment after w72 because of inefficacy, withdrawal of consent, unknown reasons, shift to observation only (1 each). Safety. Thirteen pts (72.2%) had adverse events; the median number of events per patient was 5 (range, 0-37). Five pts had G2 thrombocytopenia plus 1 pt G3 (28%), 9 had G2 anemia (50%), 1 had G2 neutropenia (6%). There were 4 non-hematologic G3 adverse events (22%), one drug-related (CPK increase) that resolved with dose reduction. Six pts developed G1-2 infections (33%), 4 had Herpes Zoster reactivation (22%), 1 developed second cancer (pheochromocytoma at w96; 6%). Efficacy. Spleen response (defined as percentage reduction of spleen length from left costal margin (LCM) from baseline value as by IWG-MRT criteria) was available in 16 of 18 pts on treatment. Of 8 pts who obtained spleen response at w72, 4 pts had a complete response, while the remaining 4 pts had a spleen reduction >50%. At last FU, 6 of 8 pts (75%) adjudicated as spleen responders at w72 maintained the response. None of the 8 pts who had not obtained a spleen response at w72 acquired it at the last FU. According to ELN/IWG-MRT criteria of disease response, 7 pts had partial response, 11 had stable disease. At abdominal vessel eco scan, thrombosis improved in 3 of 12 evaluated pts (25%) and remained stable in the remaining 9. Of the 16 pts with endoscopic evaluation at last FU, complete resolution of oesophageal varices was documented in 3/12 with baseline varices (25%), worsening in 4 (33%), stable in 5 (42%), while no de-novo formation of F1 varices was documented in the remaining 4 (33%). No pt had gastrointestinal bleeding episodes. Exploratory endpoints. Included changes in the level of JAK2V617F variant allele burden (VAF) at last FU, available in 13 of 15 JAK2V617F mutated pts. VAF remained stable in 2 pts (13%), increased by 34% (range 25-40) in 3 pts, while 8 pts (62%) had a reduction >10% (range 18-96), of whom 6 (46%) had a reduction >50% (median 82%, range 70-96). By correlative analysis of JAK2 VAF changes and spleen response, 3 of 6 pts with VAF reduction of >50% had complete spleen response, as compared to none of the 3 pts who had an increase of VAF. Conclusions. After a median follow-up of 5.5 years, ruxolitinib continues to be safe in pts with MPN-associated SVT and maintains efficacy against splenomegaly in 33% of the pts. Of note, the large majority of pts (67%) showed stabilization or improvement of oesophageal varices, supporting the hypothesis that sustained reduction of enlarged spleen might contribute to decrease the upstream venous system pressure. Significant reduction of JAK2V617F VAF>50% was documented in 40% of the pts, although it was not clearly correlated with clinical improvement. Disclosures Rumi: novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Ruxolitinib use in essential thrombocythemia

Background: Polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are myeloproliferative neoplasms that can progress to post-PV (PPV) myelofibrosis (MF) and post-ET (PET) MF, also known as secondary myelofibrosis (SMF). The 2009 International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment group (IWG-MRT) diagnostic criteria for SMF require the presence of grade 2 or 3 bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) according to the European classification. The prognostic value of BMF in primary MF has been recently explored. Aim of this study is to describe the relevance of BMF grading in terms of presentation and outcome in SMF. Methods: The MYSEC (Myelofibrosis Secondary to PV and ET Collaboration) project is an international retrospective collaboration that collected 805 SMF cases. BMF grade at time of SMF evolution was defined as grade 2 (BMF2) in case of a diffuse increase in reticulin with extensive intersections, occasional bundles of collagen and/or osteosclerosis, or as grade 3 (BMF3) if presenting with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with osteosclerosis. Chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical variables, Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous ones and multiple logistic regression analysis were applied in order to explore pattern of association between BMF grading and patients' characteristics. A Poisson regression model was applied to estimate incidence rate of events, together with 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between BMF groups were compared by a Log-rank test. The MYSEC study was approved by the Review Board of each Institution and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results: Detailed information about BMF grade was available in 675 patients: BMF2 was reported in 443 (65.6%) and BMF3 in 232 (34.4%). We did not find any correlation between BMF grade and advanced age, marrow blasts percentage, spleen and liver size, presence of constitutional symptoms, abnormal karyotype at the time of SMF diagnosis. No imbalance was evident for gender and for time to progression from PV/ET to SMF. Looking at genotype, BMF grading was not differently distributed among the 3 phenotypic driver mutations as well as the "triple negative" cases. On the contrary, in univariate analysis we found a significant association between BMF3 and previous diagnosis of ET vs. PV, decreased hemoglobin levels, reduced platelet and leukocyte counts, higher percentage of circulating blast cells and higher LDH value (Table 1). In a multivariate analysis that took into consideration SMF subtypes, complete blood count and circulating blast cells in 437 SMF patients, PET-MF, lower hemoglobin levels and reduced platelet count maintained their association with BMF3 (Table 2). The cumulative incidence of thrombosis after SMF was 3.2% (CI 95%: 2.4-4.2) person-year of follow up (PYFU) in BMF2, equivalent to BMF3 (2.7% PYFU, CI 95%: 1.2-5.7) (P = 0.44). Besides, BMF grade did not impact on the cumulative incidence of post-SMF blast phase, which resulted 2.4% (CI 95%: 1.8-3.3) PYFU in case of BMF2 and 3% (CI 95%: 1.3-6.9) PYFU in the BMF3 cohort (P = 0.68). Overall, MYSEC-PM (MYSEC-Prognostic Model) risk categories were differently distributed between BMF grades: patients with BMF2 were more frequently included in lower risk groups, while those with BMF3 were enriched in the higher categories (Table 1). Finally, we found a significantly higher mortality in patients with BMF3 vs. BMF2, mainly due to SMF progression (Table 1). Figure 1 shows the Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival in the 2 populations, resulting significantly different. Nevertheless, when considering the MYSEC-PM score in a multivariate analysis, BMF grade lost its prognostic impact on survival. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that BMF grade does correlate with specific clinical phenotype in SMF. BMF3 was associated with a more "cytopenic" phenotype (lower hemoglobin levels and reduced platelet count) and clustered with higher MYSEC-PM scores. Survival is significantly reduced in patients with BMF3. In conclusion, irrespectively of the PV/ET duration, progressive anemia and thrombocytopenia imply more frequently BMF3, finally resulting in a worse survival. This highlights the need of performing bone marrow biopsy earlier in disease evolution. Disclosures Rumi: novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Rambaldi:Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau, travel support; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Speakers Bureau; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Komrokji:Incyte: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau; celgene: Consultancy; JAZZ: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; DSI: Consultancy. Gotlib:Deceiphera: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Allakos: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kiladjian:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. Cervantes:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Palandri:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Silver:PharmEssentia: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Benevolo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Albano:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Iurlo:Novartis: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Incyte: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Pfizer: Other: Speaker Honoraria. Vannucchi:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Passamonti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Background Interferons are recognized as active agents in the treatment of patients with high risk essential thrombocythemia (ET) or polycythemia vera (PV), both in the upfront setting as well as beyond. Several trials have shown high rates of hematologic and molecular responses with the use of interferons, however, data on direct comparison of interferon activity in patients with early disease in comparison to patients refractory or resistant to prior therapies, such as hydroxyurea (HU) are lacking. We conducted a controlled analysis of the activity of pegylated interferon alfa-2a (PEG) in two prospective parallel clinical trials conducted in these two unique patient populations. Methods The MPD-RC 111 (NCT01259817) was an international, multicenter, phase 2 open-label clinical trial that evaluated PEG therapy in patients with high risk PV and high-risk ET who were either refractory or intolerant (R/I) to HU by modified ELN criteria. The MPD-RC 112 trial (NCT01258856) enrolled patients with high risk ET/PV who were treatment-naïve (TN) (HU Results Patients ET: 39 TN and 65 R/I ET patients were available for this analysis. Median disease duration was 2.9 months in TN and 37.3 months in R/I patients. Baseline characteristics and demographics were similar in the two cohorts except lower baseline hemoglobin level in RI patients. (Table1A) PV: 43 TN and 50 R/I PV patients were included. Median disease duration was 2.5 months in TN and 54.8 months in R/I patients. Baseline characteristics only differed by lower frequency of phlebotomy rate in R/I patients. (Table1B) Baseline symptoms scores and quality of life were similar in TN and RI groups (Table 2) Response ET: CR/PR/ORR at 12 months were observed in 43.1%/26.2%/69.2% in R/I ET patients and in 43.6%/25.6%/69.2% in TN ET patients (p=0.99 for ORR). (Table 3, Figure 1) PV: CR/PR/ORR at 12 months were observed in 22%/38%/60% in R/I PV patients, and in 27.9%/58.1%/86% in TN PV patients (p=0.005 for ORR). (Table 3, Figure 1) Safety PEG was equally well tolerated throughout both treatment groups with treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurring in 14.6% in TN patients and 13.9% in R/I patients. The mean (SD) dose of PEG was 102.7 (52.3) mcg in R/I ET patients and 128.7mcg (46.4) in R/I PV patients. For TN patients, mean dose was 85.7mcg (59.7) in ET and 93.5 mcg (44.0) in PV. Adverse events were consistent with historic reports of PEG use and the distribution of events was similar in R/I and TN patients. (Table 4) Conclusion This intention to treat response analysis included TN and R/I ET and PV patients with balanced baseline characteristics who received prospective therapy with PEG. Patients with ET had a higher overall response rate at 12 months that was equivalent in patients who were treatment-naïve and in patients who were intolerant or refractory to HU. By contrast, patients with PV who were treatment-naïve had a higher ORR than patients those intolerant or refractory to HU. We conclude that treatment with PEG is an effective therapeutic option both treatment naïve PV and ET as well as those previously treated with HU, however PEG as a second line agent is especially effective in ET patients. Disclosures Yacoub: Hylapharm: Equity Ownership; Agios: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ardelyx: Equity Ownership; Cara: Equity Ownership; Dynavax: Equity Ownership. Mascarenhas:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmaessentia: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Merus: Research Funding. Mesa:AbbVie: Research Funding; Samus: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Sierra Onc: Consultancy; Genotech: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; La Jolla Pharma: Consultancy. Rampal:Agios, Apexx, Blueprint Medicines, Celgene, Constellation, and Jazz: Consultancy; Constellation, Incyte, and Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding. Silver:PharmEssentia: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McMullin:Daiko Sanyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Italopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ewing:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship ; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship . O'Connell:Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mead:Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodation expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CTI: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. De Stefano:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Baer:Astellas: Research Funding; Al Therapeutics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Kremyanskaya:La Jolla: Consultancy; Incyte, Celgene, Constellation, Protagonist.: Research Funding. Hexner:novartis: Research Funding. Rambaldi:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau, travel support. Ritchie:Genentech: Other: Advisory board; Tolero: Other: Advisory board; agios: Other: Advisory board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory board, travel support; Celgene: Other: Advisory board; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene, Novartis: Other: travel support; AStella, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, NS Pharma, Pfizer: Research Funding; Ariad, Celgene, Incyte, Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Celgene, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer: Consultancy. Kiladjian:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. Harrison:Promedior: Honoraria; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; CTI: Speakers Bureau; AOP: Honoraria; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hoffman:Merus: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a for in Patients with Polycythemia Vera or Essential Thrombocythemia

Major causes of morbidity and mortality in myeloproliferative neoplasms are represented by arterial and venous complications, progression to myelofibrosis, and transformation to acute leukemia. The pathogenesis of thrombosis results from a complex interplay of clinical and disease-related factors. Abnormalities of blood cells arising from the clonal proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells involve not only quantitative changes but also qualitative modifications that characterize the switch of these cells from a resting to a procoagulant phenotype. According to age and previous thrombosis, patients are classified in a “high risk” or “low risk”. Novel disease-related determinants such as leukocytosis and JAK2V617F mutational status and/or mutational burden are now under active investigation. In low-risk polycythemia vera patients, only phlebotomy and primary antithrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin is recommended, while in high-risk patients cytotoxic therapy is considered. Whether novel drugs targeting the constitutively active JAK2/STAT pathway will improve the management of thrombosis is a challenge for future studies.

The current document is a revision of the International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) criteria for treatment response in myelofibrosis (MF) and represents a collaborative effort by the IWG-MRT and the European LeukemiaNet to objectively assess the value of new drugs in inducing morphologic remission or improvement in MF-associated symptomatic burden (MF-SB). Some of the changes in the current revision include stricter definitions of red cell transfusion dependency and independency and consideration of the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form as a tool to quantify meaningful changes in disease-related symptoms. Six response categories are listed: complete remission (CR) and partial remission signify treatment effects that are consistent with disease modification, whereas drug-induced improvements in MF-SB were annotated as clinical improvement, anemia response, spleen response, or symptoms response. Additional criteria are provided for progressive disease, stable disease, and relapse. The document also includes recommendations for assessing cytogenetic and molecular remissions, without mandating their inclusion for CR assignment.

Standardized response criteria to interpret and compare clinical trials are needed for approval of new therapeutic agents by regulatory agencies. The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) response criteria for essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) issued in 2009 have been widely adopted as end points in a number of recent clinical trials. However, evidence exists that they do not predict response or provide clinically relevant measures of benefit for the patients. This article presents revised recommendations for assessing response in ET and PV provided by a working group established by ELN and International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment. New definitions of complete and partial remission incorporate clinical, hematological, and histological response assessments that include a standardized symptom assessment form and consider absence of disease progression and vascular events. We anticipate that these criteria will be adopted widely to facilitate the development of new and more effective therapies for ET and PV.

Patients with myelofibrosis (MF) have significant debilitating symptoms, physical disabilities, and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Here, we report post-hoc analyses of the impact of ruxolitinib, a potent and selective JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, on disease-related symptoms and HRQoL in MF patients from the large phase 3 COMFORT-II study (N = 219). During the follow-up period of 48 weeks, HRQoL and MF-associated symptoms improved from baseline for ruxolitinib-treated patients but remained the same or worsened for best available therapy (BAT)-treated patients. Based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire core 30 items (EORTC QLQ-C30), treatment-induced differences in physical and role functioning, fatigue, and appetite loss significantly favoured ruxolitinib versus BAT from week 8 (P < 0·05) up to week 48 (P < 0·05). Ruxolitinib resulted in significantly higher response rates in global health status/QoL and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) summary scores versus BAT at most time points (P < 0·05). Significant improvements in the Lymphoma subscale (including symptoms of pain, fever, itching, fatigue, weight loss, loss of appetite, and other patient concerns), FACT-General, FACT-Lym trial outcome index, and FACT-Lym total were also observed with ruxolitinib versus BAT starting at week 8 and continuing thereafter. Overall, these data demonstrated that ruxolitinib improved HRQoL in MF patients and further support the use of ruxolitinib for the treatment of symptomatic MF.

Current guidelines suggest that polycythemia vera (PV) patients maintain a strict hematocrit less than 45%. However, to date, little is known about the relationship between HCT control and PV- related symptom burden. In this study, PV patient data was analyzed from the CYTO PV trial (n = 224) and the MPN-SAF study cohort (n = 645). No significant differences in symptom burden were seen at the 6 and 12 month follow-up when evaluating prospective hematocrit control in the CYTO PV cohort. Patients in the MPN-SAF cohort with a worst item score of greater than 5/10 on the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Total Symptom Score had a significantly lower mean hematocrit (p = .0376). These findings suggest a relationship between traditional aggressive therapy for PV and increased symptom burden with prolonged therapy. Thus, symptom burden should be considered when contemplating the choice of therapy in the second-line setting for PV.

Polycythemia Vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are myeloproliferative neoplasms respectively characterized by erythrocytosis and thrombocytosis; other disease features include leukocytosis, splenomegaly, thrombosis, bleeding, microcirculatory symptoms, pruritus, and risk of leukemic or fibrotic transformation.PV is defined by a JAK2 mutation, whose absence, combined with normal or increased serum erythropoietin level, makes the diagnosis unlikely. JAK2, CALR, and MPL mutations are the mutually exclusive "driver" mutations in ET with respective incidences of 55%, 25%, and 3%; approximately 17% are triple-negative. However, the same molecular markers might also be present in prefibrotic myelofibrosis, whose morphological distinction from ET is prognostically relevant.Median survivals are approximately 14 years for PV and 20 years for ET; the corresponding values for younger patients (age60 years) are 24 and 33 years. Life-expectancy in ET is inferior to the control population. Driver mutational status has not been shown to affect survival in ET whereas the presence of JAK2/MPL mutations has been associated with higher risk of arterial thrombosis and that of MPL with higher risk of fibrotic progression. Risk factors for overall survival in both ET and PV include advanced age, leukocytosis and thrombosis. Leukemic transformation rates at 20 years are estimated at10% for PV and 5% for ET; fibrotic transformation rates are slightly higher. Most recently, ASXL1, SRSF2, and IDH2 mutations have been associated with inferior overall, leukemia-free or fibrosis-free survival in PV; similarly adverse mutations in ET included SH2B3, SF3B1, U2AF1, TP53, IDH2, and EZH2.Current risk stratification in PV and ET is designed to estimate the likelihood of recurrent thrombosis. Accordingly, PV includes two risk categories: high-risk (age60 years or thrombosis history) and low-risk (absence of both risk factors). In ET, risk stratification includes four categories: very low risk (age ≤60 years, no thrombosis history, JAK2/MPL un-mutated), low risk (age ≤60 years, no thrombosis history, JAK2/MPL mutated), intermediate risk (age60 years, no thrombosis history, JAK2/MPL un-mutated), and high risk (thrombosis history or age60 years with JAK2/MPL mutation). In addition, presence of extreme thrombocytosis (platelets1000 × 10(9)/L) might be associated with acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AvWS) and, therefore, risk of bleeding.The main goal of therapy in PV and ET is to prevent thrombohemorrhagic complications. All patients with PV require phlebotomy to keep hematocrit below 45% and once-daily aspirin (81 mg). In addition, high-risk patients with PV require cytoreductive therapy. Very low risk ET patients might not require any form of therapy while low-risk patients require at least once-daily aspirin therapy. Cytoreductive therapy is also recommended for high-risk ET patients but it is not mandatory for intermediate-risk patients. First-line drug of choice for cytoreductive therapy, in both ET and PV, is hydroxyurea and second-line drugs of choice are interferon-α and busulfan. We currently do not recommend treatment with ruxolutinib or other JAK2 inhibitors in PV or ET, unless in the presence of severe and protracted pruritus or marked splenomegaly that is not responding to the aforementioned drugs. Screening for AvWS is recommended before administrating aspirin, in the presence of extreme thrombocytosis. Am. J. Hematol. 92:95-108, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a clonal myeloproliferative disorder with a relatively benign clinical course and long survival in most patients. The major cause of mortality and morbidity are thromboembolic complications, which occur more frequently in older subjects or in those with a previous thrombosis. The therapeutic options comprise cytoreductive agents (cytotoxic drugs, interferon, anagrelide) and anti-aggregating drugs. In clinical practice the choice of treatment primarily takes into account the patient's age, history and symptoms. The use of platelet-lowering agents is indicated in patients above 60 years and in those with a history of thrombosis or major bleeding, or very high platelet count (e.g. >1,000 X 10(9)/1). Hydroxyurea has emerged as the treatment of choice after the recent demonstration of its efficacy in reducing not only the platelet count but also thromboembolic complications. Low-dose aspirin may be added in the presence of thrombosis or microvascular disturbances. In younger, asymptomatic patients, an initial policy of observation, without specific treatment, or with only low-dose antiaggregating agents seems reasonable. Doubt about the risk of leukaemia transformation associated with hydroxyurea suggests that the use of interferon or anagrelide should be explored.

This review is based on the deliberations at the 5th John Goldman Colloquium held in Estoril on 2nd October 2015 and the 9th post-ASH International Workshop on chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) which took place on the 10th-11th December 2014, immediately following the 56th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting. It has been updated since and summarizes the most recent advances in the biology and therapy of these diseases, in particular updates of genetics of MPN, novel insights from mouse MPN models, targeting CML stem cells and its niche; clinical advances include updates on JAK2 inhibitors and other therapeutic approaches to BCR-ABL1-negative MPNs, the use of alpha interferons, updates on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) randomized trials in CML, TKI cessation studies, and optimal monitoring strategies.

The myeloproliferative neoplasms, including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia and myelofibrosis, are distinguished by their debilitating symptom profiles, life-threatening complications and profound impact on quality of life. The role gender plays in the symptomatology of myeloproliferative neoplasms remains under-investigated. In this study we evaluated how gender relates to patients' characteristics, disease complications and overall symptom expression. A total of 2,006 patients (polycythemia vera=711, essential thrombocythemia=830, myelofibrosis=460, unknown=5) were prospectively evaluated, with patients completing the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Symptom Assessment Form and Brief Fatigue Inventory Patient Reported Outcome tools. Information on the individual patients' characteristics, disease complications and laboratory data was collected. Consistent with known literature, most female patients were more likely to have essential thrombocythemia (48.6% versus 33.0%; P

The prognostic significance of bone marrow (BM) fibrosis grade in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is still debated. A fibrosis grade greater than 1 was shown to associate with higher risk of death, and addition of fibrosis grade to IPSS score resulted in a more accurate prediction of survival. The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic impact of BM fibrosis in 490 patients with PMF, evaluated at diagnosis, molecularly annotated and with extensive follow-up information. We found that fibrosis grade 2 and greater on a 0-3 scale was associated with clinical characteristics indicative of a more advanced disease, such as anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, constitutional symptoms, larger splenomegaly and a higher IPSS risk category. Patients with higher grade of fibrosis were also more likely to have additional somatic mutations in ASXL1 and EZH2, that are prognostically adverse. Median survival was significantly reduced in patients with grade 2 and 3 fibrosis as compared with grade 1; this effect was maintained when analysis was restricted to younger patients. In multivariate analysis, fibrosis grade independently predicted for survival regardless of IPSS variables and mutational status; the adverse impact of fibrosis was noticeable especially in lower IPSS risk categories. Overall, results indicate that higher grades of fibrosis correlate with unique clinical and molecular aspects and represent an independent adverse variable in patients with PMF; these observations deserve confirmation in prospectively designed series of patients. Am. J. Hematol. 91:918-922, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

JAK2 mutations define polycythemia vera (PV), CALR and MPL mutations are specific to JAK2 unmutated essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). We overviewed the current knowledge on the relationship between these phenotypic driver mutations and thrombotic complications that are major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) particularly PV and ET. The JAK2 mutation is found in 50-60% of patients with ET and PMF. The International Prognostic Score for Thrombosis in ET (IPSET-thrombosis) identified JAK2 mutation as an independent risk factor and a 3-tiered prognostic model was devised. IPSET-thrombosis model outperformed the 2-tiered conventional risk stratification that includes age and thrombotic history. PV is usually associated with a JAK2 mutation and studies looking at the role of JAK2V617F allele burden associated with thrombosis are so far inconclusive. In PMF, the rate of major thrombosis is around 2%pt-yr and JAK2 mutation emerged as an independent risk factor for these events. Calreticulin/MPL (CALR) is the second most frequent mutation and occurs in half of JAK2 and MPL wild-type patients with ET and PMF. Despite the fact that these mutations are associated with high platelet counts, the risk of thrombosis compared with JAK2 and MPL mutated cases is significantly lower. The role of MPL in the prediction of thrombosis is of difficult demonstration due to the low frequency in ET and PMF. Therefore, these epidemiologic studies pointed out the role of JAK2V617F mutation as a major contributory factor for the pathogenesis of thrombosis in MPN. Abnormalities of blood cells arising from the clonal proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells may explain the switch to a procoagulant phenotype.

Accurate prediction of thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia (ET) provides the platform for prospective studies exploring preventive measures. Current risk stratification for thrombosis in ET is 2-tiered and considers low- and high-risk categories based on the respective absence or presence of either age > 60 years or history of thrombosis. In an international study of 891 patients with World Health Organization (WHO)–defined ET, we identified additional independent risk factors including cardiovascular risk factors and JAK2V617F. Accordingly, we assigned risk scores based on multivariable analysis–derived hazard ratios (HRs) to age > 60 years (HR = 1.5; 1 point), thrombosis history (HR = 1.9; 2 points), cardiovascular risk factors (HR = 1.6; 1 point), and JAK2V617F (HR = 2.0; 2 points) and subsequently devised a 3-tiered prognostic model (low-risk = < 2 points; intermediate-risk = 2 points; and high-risk = > 2 points) using a training set of 535 patients and validated the results in the remaining cohort (n = 356; internal validation set) and in an external validation set (n = 329). Considering all 3 cohorts (n = 1220), the 3-tiered new prognostic model (low-risk n = 474 vs intermediate-risk n = 471 vs high-risk n = 275), with a respective thrombosis risk of 1.03% of patients/y versus 2.35% of patients/y versus 3.56% of patients/y, outperformed the 2-tiered (low-risk 0.95% of patients/y vs high-risk 2.86% of patients/y) conventional risk stratification in predicting future vascular events.

Because the current therapy in polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) is aimed at lowering the risk of thrombosis, the risk classification system in these disorders is shaped according to thrombotic risk. Patients with either PV or ET can be stratified in a "high-risk" or "low-risk" category according to their age and previous history of thrombosis. Whether novel risk factors such as leukocytosis and JAK2 mutation may be included in the prognostic stratification requires confirmation in prospective future clinical studies. The identification and appropriate management of cardiovascular risk factors and the promotion of a healthy lifestyle in chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), as in the general population, should be considered a cornerstone of vascular prevention. Blood hyperviscosity in PV is a major cause of vascular disturbances which severely impact on morbidity and mortality. An aggressive target of hematocrit lower than 45% in males and 42% in females has been advised by the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) group, although no convincing evidence of this recommendation is currently available. The efficacy and safety of low-dose aspirin (100mg daily) in PV has been assessed in the European Collaboration on Low-dose Aspirin in Polycythemia (ECLAP) double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Translating evidence from the positive results of ECLAP to ET may be questionable. The most commonly used front-line therapy drugs for the treatment of high-risk PV and ET patients include hydroxyurea and alpha-interferon at any age while anagrelide is recommended as second line-therapy in resistant and intolerant ET patients. Busulphan is a front-line therapy in the elderly. By definition, children with ET are a population with low vascular risk unless a major thrombotic or hemorrhagic event has occurred. ELN recommends to prescribe cytoreductive drugs in children as a last resort. No results of clinical trials with JAK-2 inhibitor drugs in PV and ET are so far available.

We aimed to determine risk factors for thrombotic events in early/prefibrotic myelofibrosis diagnosed according to the World Health Organization criteria. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was calculated on a total number of 264 patients derived from an international database. After a median follow-up of 6.28 years, 42 (15.9%) patients experienced arterial (n = 31) or venous thrombosis (n = 11). A higher leukocyte count correlated with an increased risk for total thrombosis and in particular, with an increased risk for arterial thrombosis (P = 0.005, HR 1.15 and P = 0.047, HR 1.12, respectively). A platelet count above 870 × 10⁹/L was associated with a lower risk for total thrombosis and also for venous thrombosis (P = 0.022, HR 0.44 and P = 0.027, HR 0.19). Moreover, a lower hemoglobin level was associated with an increased risk for venous thrombosis (P = 0.007, HR 0.59). Our data indicate that leukocytosis is a prominent risk factor for thrombosis in early/prefibrotic MF.

To the editor: In a large international cohort of contemporary polycythemia vera (PV) patients[1][1] recruited at diagnosis and treated according to European LeukemiaNet recommendations,[2][2] the postdiagnosis total major thrombosis rate was 2.62% patients per year, lower than that reported in the

In this article, an updated overview of risk factors and management of vascular complications in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) is presented.The rate of thrombosis in patients with polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis is elevated and a risk-oriented therapeutic approach is recommended to avoid inappropriate exposure to cytotoxic drugs on one side or suboptimal treatment on the other. Established thrombosis risk factors are age and previous vascular events but novel disease-related determinants such as leukocytosis and JAK2V617F mutational status and/or mutational burden are now under active investigation. The theory that elevated platelet count increases thrombosis risk in these diseases is now challenged.Recent recommendations by the European Leukemia Net suggest that MPN patients should be stratified and treated according to conventional risk factors (age and previous events) and that baseline leukocytosis and JAK2V617F mutation should be considered once more information is available and when they have been eventually validated in prospective studies.

Symptomatic burden in myeloproliferative neoplasms is present in most patients and compromises quality of life. We sought to validate a broadly applicable 18-item instrument (Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form [MPN-SAF], coadministered with the Brief Fatigue Inventory) to assess symptoms of myelofibrosis, essential thrombocythemia, and polycythemia vera among prospective cohorts in the United States, Sweden, and Italy. A total of 402 MPN-SAF surveys were administered (English [25%], Italian [46%], and Swedish [28%]) in 161 patients with essential thrombocythemia, 145 patients with polycythemia vera, and 96 patients with myelofibrosis. Responses among the 3 administered languages showed great consistency after controlling for MPN subtype. Strong correlations existed between individual items and key symptomatic elements represented on both the MPN-SAF and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30. Enrolling physicians' blinded opinion of patient symptoms (6 symptoms assessed) were highly correlated with corresponding patients' responses. Serial administration of the English MPN-SAF among 53 patients showed that most MPN-SAF items are well correlated (r > 0.5, P < .001) and highly reproducible (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.7). The MPN-SAF is a comprehensive and reliable instrument that is available in multiple languages to evaluate symptoms associated with all types of MPNs in clinical trials globally.

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a chronic myeloproliferative disorder whose major morbidity and mortality are thrombohaemorragic events. Current guidelines advise maintaining hematocrit (HCT) level below 45% in males and 42% in females. Such targets lean on pathophysiological reasoning, while evidence from ECLAP and PVSG-01, the two largest prospective studies in this disease, suggests no difference in the rate of thrombosis in patients maintained at different HCT values below 50%–52%. Cytoreductive therapy in PV (CYTO-PV) is a multicenter, randomized, and controlled trial assess the benefit/risk profile of cytoreductive therapy with phlebotomy or HU aimed at maintaining HCT < 45% versus maintaining HCT in the range 45%–50%. CYTO-PV is being conducted in the framework of the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche nell'Adulto (GIMEMA) and is funded by the Italian Drug Agency (AIFA). It is an independent trial with broad recruitment criteria to mimic clinical practice. We describe here the study and its advancement status. Conclusions. Clinical research in rare disease can be carried out with limited funds, provided a research hypothesis is felt as clinically relevant by a scientific community willing to share knowledge on the outcome of clinical practice, thus producing scientific results useful to improve treatment and prognosis of patients.

The platelet contribution to the thrombophilic state of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), i.e., essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV), remains uncertain. In this study we aimed to characterize the thrombin generation (TG) potential expressed by platelets from these subjects, compare it to normal platelets, and identify what factors might be responsible for platelet TG. In a group of 140 MPN patients (80 ET and 60 PV) and 72 healthy subjects we measured the global procoagulant potential of platelet rich plasma (PRP) utilizing the TG assay by the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT). To characterize the procoagulant contribution of platelets in PRP, the TG of both isolated platelets and platelet poor plasma was measured, and the platelet surface expression of TF was determined. Finally, the activation status of platelets was assessed by the levels of P-selectin expressed on platelet surface. MPN patients had significantly increased PRP and isolated platelet TG potential compared to controls. This was associated to the occurrence of platelet activation. Patients carriers of the JAK2V617F mutation showed the highest values of TG and platelet surface TF and P-selectin. Platelet TG potential was significantly lower in hydroxyurea (HU) compared to non-HU-treated patients and was lowest in HU-treated JAK2V617F carriers. In subjects not receiving HU, platelet TG significantly increased by JAK2V617F allele burden increment (P

The term RBC-transfusion-dependence is widely-used by hematologists to describe a condition of severe anemia typically arising when erythropoiesis is reduced such that a person continuously requires ≥ 1 RBC-transfusions over a specified interval. Defining a person as RBC-transfusion-dependent has important implications in diverse hematological disorders especially because it strongly-correlated with decreased survival. Conversely, becoming RBC-transfusion-independent or receiving fewer RBC-transfusions over a specified interval is defined as improvement or response in many disease- and/or therapy-setting. Whether this correlates with improved survival is controversial. We used a structured expert-panel consensus panel process to define RBC-transfusion-dependence and -independence or improvement. We suggest these definitions may prove useful to persons studying or treating these diseases.

To the editor: Controlled studies in polycythemia vera (PV) have demonstrated the value of aggressive phlebotomy, aspirin, and cytoreductive therapy in preventing thrombotic complications.[1][1][⇓][2]-[3][3] In the European Collaboration on Low-Dose Aspirin in Polycythemia Vera (ECLAP)

In patients not meeting the required hematocrit (HCT) or hemoglobin (Hb) thresholds according to BCSH and the WHO diagnostic criteria, the diagnosis of masked polycythemia vera (mPV) has been proposed. A comparison of HCT or Hb values with the expression of JAK2V617F, JAK2 exon 12, and CALR mutations in strictly WHO-defined 257 overt PV and 140 mPV (59 mPV according to BCSH) and 397 patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) was performed. Hb and HCT thresholds of mPV patients were significantly higher than JAK2V617F ET (P < 0.0001). The best cut-off for Hb to discriminate JAK2-mutated ET from PV was 16.5 g/dL for males and 16.0 g/dL for females. For HCT, this was 49% in males and 48% in females. The proportion of patients correctly classified as ET or PV when regarding Hb or HCT levels was 95% in males and 93% in females and 94% in both males and females, respectively.

Special issues in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) comprise clinical conditions with high relevance for the duration and quality of the patient's life, but with limited evidence to support sound diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations and a low probability of being solved by the current standard of clinical research. These issues include MPN in pregnancy and in children, abdominal vein thrombosis, bleeding complications, surgery, pruritus, and leukemic transformation. Practical suggestions to guide clinical decisions in these settings remain largely empirical, but recently developed guidelines based on experts' consensus may help to tackle these problems. This article reviews the state of the art regarding these issues, with special emphasis on experts' consensus recommendations.

We tested the hypothesis that levels of pentraxin high sensitivity C-reactive protein and pentraxin 3 might be correlated with cardiovascular complications in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera. High sensitivity C-reactive protein and pentraxin 3 were measured in 244 consecutive essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera patients in whom, after a median follow up of 5.3 years (range 0–24), 68 cardiovascular events were diagnosed. The highest C-reactive protein tertile was compared with the lowest (>3 vs.

Background: Patients (pts) with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) suffer from difficult MPN associated symptoms which impact quality of life (QoL). The impact of initial cytoreduction on ET/PV symptoms, resulting toxicity and QoL have not been prospectively studied. Methods: MPD-RC 112 trial (NCT01258856) randomized 168 therapy-naive (hydroxyurea [HU] Results: Patients: Of 168 randomized pts (86 HU, 82 PEG), 164 (98%) completed the survey package at baseline and 151 (HU 83%; PEG 98%) completed at least 1 survey during treatment. Median age was 61 (range 18-87) with 70 (42%) females; 81 (48%) / 87 (52%) with ET / PV; 46 (27%) had a history of a thrombosis. 119 (71%) received prior HU (up to 3 months). Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms with the exception of age (median HU 63 vs. PEG 60 yrs; p=0.02). Baseline Symptom Burden /QoL: Mean MPN-SAF Total Symptom Score (TSS), scale 0 [absent]-100 [worst imaginable] was 15.8 (SD 12.6; range 0-62.0) with means of 15.1 (SD 12.6) / 16.5 (SD 12.6) for ET / PV which were slightly lower than reported means of a previous cohort receiving any line of treatment (Scherber RM, JCO 2012). Median number of moderate (defined as score >=3) symptoms in ET patients was 3.0 and PV 4.0. Most common moderate symptoms were fatigue (65.9%), insomnia (37.2%), numbness (33.5%) , itching (29.9%), dizziness (27.4%), early satiety (26.8%) , headache (23.2%), sad mood (23.2%), inactivity (22%), concentration (20.7%). 50.6% of patients had one or more symptom with a score >=6. Mean QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL (GHS/QoL) was 70.8 (SD 21.9) - comparable to a general population (mean 71.2, SD 22.4) and better than a general cancer population (mean 61.3, SD 24.2; QLQ-C30 Reference Manual 2008). At baseline, TSS, symptoms, and QoL were similar between treatment arms. In patients with TSS >20 at baseline (highly symptomatic, n=50; ET:20, PV:30), median TSS was 28.0 (range 20.0 to 62.0); the highest scored symptom was fatigue (median=7.0), itching (median=4.5) and insomnia (median=4.0). Impact of Therapy on Symptom Burden/QoL: On HU, pts experienced worsening QoL (physical, cognitive functioning, HRQoL) and some persistent or transient worsened symptoms (inactivity, concentration (p 20, n=50), improvements in weight loss, abdominal discomfort, fatigue, itching, fever, early satiety (12 m.) were observed in pts on HU. For PEG, in highly symptomatic pts, improvements were observed for overall TSS score, fatigue, inactivity, night sweats, and itching (with similar toxicities to all PEG patients). ELN Response and Symptom Burden/QoL: Among the 133 pts with 12-mo symptom data, complete hematologic response (CHR) rate was 43%. Inactivity and sad mood were worse in those patient achieving a CHR (inactivity: CHR worsening 0.68 vs PHR/NR better 0.26; p=0.03; sad mood: CHR worsening 0.67 vs PHR/NR better 0.67, p=0.002)). These latter changes were not related to higher doses utilized (in either arm), suggesting obtaining CHR may have negative effects on patient symptoms. Conclusions:In pts with a significant baseline MPN symptom burden, cytoreductive therapy has both a beneficial impact on baseline MPN symptom burden but also leads to therapy associated toxicity, although different patterns of efficacy and toxicity between HU and PEG. Achievement of a CHR in PV/ET may be associated with higher rates of drug related toxicities, and the value of achieving CHR may need further validation. Disclosures Mesa: Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; UT Health San Antonio - Mays Cancer Center: Employment; Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Mascarenhas:Merck: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Rambaldi:Omeros: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Italfarmaco: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy. Yacoub:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Cara Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Ardelyx, INC.: Equity Ownership; Inycte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Dynavax: Equity Ownership. Harrison:Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; CTI BioPharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kiladjian:AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mead:Elstar: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; ARIAD: Consultancy; Cell Therapeutics: Consultancy; Evotek: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Kessler:Sangamo: Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Dimension Advisory boards: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; DSMB: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Biomarin: Research Funding. Kremyanskaya:Incyte: Research Funding. Rampal:Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Stemline: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Hoffman:Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Merus: Research Funding; Formation Biologics: Research Funding; Summer Road: Research Funding. Dueck:Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Employment; Phytogine: Employment.

Background. Cardiovascular (CV) events are leading cause of morbidity and mortality in PV. Current risk stratification is based on variables predicting thrombotic risk, ie age >60y and history of thrombosis. Recent studies focused on additional thrombotic risk factors in PV, including generic CV factors and leukocytosis. PV patients (pts) are JAK2V617F mutated, and present wide heterogeneity in variant allele frequency (VAF); it was shown that a VAF >75% was associated with higher number of thrombotic events after diagnosis (Vannucchi AM, Leukemia 2007), but the prognostic role of JAK2 VAF is still debated. Aim. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of JAK2V617F VAF on rate of thrombosis in WHO-2016 defined PV pts. Patients and Method. In the CRIMM (Florence) database, a total of 577 pts with a JAK2VF VAF determined within 3 years from diagnosis, who met the 2016 WHO criteria for PV, were identified. All pts had information regarding thromboembolic events, including history of thrombosis, occurrence, type and date of thrombosis in the follow-up (FU) and presence of CV risk factors (smoking, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus). Thrombosis‐free survival (TFS) was determined from the time of diagnosis to the time the first thrombotic event occurred. Pts in whom thrombosis did not occur were censored at the time of last FU. Pre-receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots were used to determine cutoff levels for continuous variables of interest. Differences in the distribution of continuous variables between categories were analyzed by Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis test. Pts' groups with nominal variables were compared by χ2 test. TFS was estimated by Kaplan Meier analysis; log rank test was used to compare TFS difference between groups. Cox proportional hazards regression was used for multivariable analysis. A two tailed P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. The median age of pts at diagnosis was 61y, 308 (53.4%) were above 60y; 57.2% were males. All pts were mutated for JAK2V617F with a median VAF 43% (range 1-100%), 62% had at least one CV risk factor; 83 (14.4%) pts suffered from an episode of thrombosis within 3 yr from, or coincident with, diagnosis. The median FU was 7.3y (0.6-35.9y) during which 87 pts (15.1%) developed thrombosis. (50 arterial and 45 venous thrombosis). During the FU, 110 pts (19.1%) died. A JAK2VAF of ≥60% cutoff level, as determined by ROC analysis, correlated with measurements of stimulated erythropoiesis (higher hematocrit, lower mean cell volume and serum ferritin; all P60% had greater risk to progress to PPV-MF (RR 8.5, P Conclusions. This study indicates that conventionally-defined high-risk PV pts with a JAK2V617F VAF ≥60% suffer from increased rate of venous events and might be worthwhile of more intensive antithrombotic prophylaxis. Figure. Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

INTRODUCTION The incidence of secondary cancer (SC) in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) is high and comparable to that of thrombosis. However, the identification of patient subgroups that might be at increased susceptibility of developing SC has not been systematically addressed. We report here the results of an international case-control study (MPN-K) aimed at comparing the frequency of exposure to possible causes of SC in patients with classical MPN, polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and myelofibrosis (MF). METHODS This European Leukaemia Network (ELN) study reports MPN patients from 28 sites of 5 European countries and Israel, diagnosed in the period from 2000 to 2016. Cases were MPN patients with concomitant diagnosis of a non-myeloid SC (n=15) or its presentation during the course of the disease (n=412). Controls were MPN patients cancer-free, matched to the paired case for sex, age (±5 years), date of MPN diagnosis (±5 years), and MPN disease duration (±6 years). A multivariable conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate the effect of selected variables on total SC risk and in different types of SC. RESULTS Among 1,259 MPN patients, there were 427 cases and 832 matched controls. Cases presented melanoma (n=20; 4.7%), non-melanoma skin cancer (n=69; 16.2% - basal/squamous cell carcinoma), non-skin solid cancer (n=290; 67.9%) including breast, ovary/uterus, colorectal, upper gastrointestinal, liver/pancreas, lung, prostate/urinary, other and lymphoproliferative diseases (n=48; 11.2%) including multiple myeloma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, low and high grade B- and T-lymphoma. At diagnosis, there were slightly more patients with PV among SC cases (n= 152; 35.6%) than controls (n=256; 30.8%), while conversely there were slightly less ET patients among cases (n=196; 45.9%) than controls (n=426; 51.2%). Cases and controls presented similar proportion of MF diagnosis (n=79 cases, 18.5% and 150 controls, 18.0%). Driver mutations (JAK2 V617, EXON-12, CALR, MPL), non-driver mutations and abnormal karyotype were equally represented in cases and controls. Other variables such as cardiovascular risk factors, exposure to cancerogens, family history of cancer and chronic inflammatory diseases were reported with similar frequency in cases and controls. After MPN diagnosis, exposure to first and other lines of treatments until the index event, with Phlebotomy (n=193; 15.3%), Hydroxyurea (n=814; 64.7%), Anagrelide (n=14; 1.1%), Interferon (n=30; 2.4%), Pipobroman (n=8; 0.6%), Busulphan (n=13; 1.0%), Ruxolitinib (n=11; 0.9%), was similar in the two groups except for aspirin that was used less frequently (p=0.043) in cases (n=320; 74.9%) compared to controls (n=664; 79.9%). In particular, the lower use of aspirin was circumscribed to non-skin solid tumors. A multivariable analysis was carried out in all patients and stratified by different type of tumors (Table). In non-skin solid cancers, the time to exposure of the MPN disease > 5 years (OR=2.95; 95% CI 1.54-5.66, p=0.001) and the PV phenotype (OR=2.40, 95% CI 1.15-5.01, p=0.020) were more burdened by the incidence of events than the reference ET group. No difference in SC risk was found for MF patients compared to patients with ET. Interestingly, the independent protective role of aspirin retained its statistical significance only in non-skin SC. In non-melanoma skin cancer, multivariable analysis revealed that the presence of JAK2 mutation was less associated with SC (OR=0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.81, p=0.016) and confirmed that exposure to HU and other cytotoxic agents was associated with a significantly higher risk of SC (OR=6.00, 95% CI 1.23-29.28, p=0.027 and OR=9.80, 95% CI 1.24-77.78, p=0.031, respectively). This finding was not seen in non-skin SC and in lymphoma. CONCLUSION The considered clinical and biological features, at MPN diagnosis, were not different in cases with SC and controls. During the course of the disease, three factors significantly and independently affected the risk of SC in these MPN patients: 1) patients with PV had a 77% higher risk than those with ET, 2) patients with MPN duration of more than 5 years had a twice higher risk than those with lower duration, 3) for the first time, we documented that in non-skin solid cancers, aspirin treatment reduced SC risk of 38%. Exposure to HU and other cytoreductive drugs was confirmed as a risk factor for non-melanoma skin cancer. Disclosures Palandri: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Marchetti:Gilead: Consultancy; takeda: Speakers Bureau; amgen: Speakers Bureau; janssen: Speakers Bureau. Griesshammer:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

The occurrence of hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) has been reported in up to 60% of patients following stem cell transplantation (SCT), with incidence varying widely between studies depending on the type of transplant, conditioning regimen, and criteria used to make the diagnosis. Severe VOD is characterized by high mortality and progression to multiorgan failure (MOF); however, there is no consensus on how to evaluate severity. This review and analysis of published reports attempts to clarify these issues by calculating the overall mean incidence of VOD and mortality from severe VOD, examining the effect of changes in SCT practice on the incidence of VOD over time, and discussing the methods used to evaluate severity. Across 135 studies performed between 1979 and October 2007, the overall mean incidence of VOD was 13.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 13.3%–14.1%). The mean incidence of VOD was significantly lower between 1979–1994 than between 1994–2007 (11.5% [95% CI, 10.9%–12.1%] vs 14.6% [95% CI, 14.0%–15.2%]; P < .05). The mortality rate from severe VOD was 84.3% (95% CI, 79.6%–88.9%); most of these patients had MOF, which also was the most frequent cause of death. Thus, VOD is less common than early reports suggested, but the current incidence appears to be relatively stable despite recent advances in SCT, including the advent of reduced-intensity conditioning. The evolution of MOF in the setting of VOD after SCT can be considered a reliable indication of severity and a predictor of poor outcome.