With the proliferation of Weblogs (blogs) use in educational contexts, gaining a better understanding of why students are willing to utilize blog systems has become an important topic for practitioners and academics. While perceived enjoyment has been found to have a significant influence on behavioral intentions to use blogs or hedonic systems, few studies have investigated the antecedents of perceived enjoyment in the acceptance of blogging. The main purpose of the present study is to explore the individual difference antecedents of perceived enjoyment and examine how they influence behavioral intention to blog through the mediation of perceived enjoyment. Based on the previous literature, the Big Five personality traits (i.e., extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience), as well as computer self-efficacy and personal innovation in information technology (PIIT), are hypothesized as potential antecedents of perceived enjoyment in the acceptance of blogging. Data collected from 358 respondents in Taiwan are tested against the research model using the structural equation modeling approach. The results indicate that extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and PIIT have a significant influence on perceived enjoyment, which in turn significantly influences the behavioral intention to blog. These findings lead to several important implications for future research., {"references":["Agarwal, R., Karahanna, E., 2000. Time flies when you-re having fun:\ncognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage.\nMIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.","Agarwal, R., Prasad, J., 1998. A conceptual and operational definition\nof personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology.\nInformation Systems Research, 9(2), 204-215.","Agarwal, R., Prasad, J., 1999. Are individual differences germane to\nthe acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences,\n30(2), 361-391.","Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., Stair, R.M., 2000. Research report:\nThe evolving relationship between general and specific computer\nself-efficacy -- an empirical assessment. Information Systems\nResearch, 11(4), 418-430.","Aguilar, M.L., Kaiser, R.T., Murray, C.B., Ozer, D.J., 1998.\nValidation of an adjective Q-sort as a measure of the Big Five\npersonality structure. Journal of Black Psychology, 24(2), 145-163.","Ajzen, I. 1985. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned\nbehavior, in: Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J. (Eds.), Action Control: From\nCognitive to Behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag, 11-39.","Ajzen, I., 1988. Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Chicago, Illinois:\nThe Dorsey Press.","Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting\nSocial Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.","Alavi, M., Joachimsthaler, E.A., 1992. Revisiting DSS\nimplementation research: a meta-analysis of the literature and\nsuggests for researchers. MIS Quarterly, 16(1), 95-116.\n[10] Amichai-Hamburger, Y., 2002. Internet and personality. Computers in\nHuman Behavior, 18(1), 1-10.\n[11] Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Ben-Artzi, E., 2003. Loneliness and Internet\nuse. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(1), 71-80.\n[12] Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., 1991. The Big Five personality\ndimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel\nPsychology, 44(1), 1-26.\n[13] Benbasat, I., Barki, H., 2007. Quo Vadis TAM? Journal of the\nAssociation for Information Systems, 8(4), 211-218.\n[14] Benet-Martinez, V., John, O.P., 1998. Los Cinco Grandes across\ncultures and ethnic groups: multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big\nFive in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social\nPsychology, 75(3), 729-750.\n[15] Bollen, K.A., 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables, John\nWiley & Sons, New York.\n[16] Chau, P.Y.K., 2001. Influence of computer attitude and self-efficacy\non IT usage behavior. Journal of End User Computing, 13(1), 26-33.\n[17] Chung, J., Tan, F.B., 2004. Antecedents of perceived playfulness: an\nexploratory study on user acceptance of general\ninformation-searching websites. Information & Management, 41(7),\n869-881.\n[18] Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A., 1995. Computer self-efficacy:\ndevelopment of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2),\n189-211.\n[19] Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R., 1992. NEO PI-R Professional Manual.\nOdessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.\n[20] Cyr, D., Head, M., Ivanov, A., 2006. Design aesthetics leading to\nm-loyalty in mobile commerce. Information & Management, 43(8),\n950-963.\n[21] Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R., 1992. Extrinsic and\nintrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of\nApplied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.\n[22] Deci, E.L., 1975. Intrinsic Motivation. New York: Plenum.\n[23] Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and\nSelf-determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.\n[24] Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., 1987. Accessibility and stability of predictors\nin the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social\nPsychology, 63(5), 754-765.\n[25] Dickinger, A., Arami, M., Meyer, D., 2006. Reconsidering the\nadoption process: enjoyment and social norms - antecedents of\nhedonic mobile technology use. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii\nInternational Conference on System Sciences.\n[26] Du, H.S., Wagner, C., 2006. Weblog success: exploring the role of\ntechnology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 64(9),\n789-798.\n[27] Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior:\nAn Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA:\nAddison-Wesley.\n[28] Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation\nmodels with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal\nof Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.\n[29] Gefen, D., Straub, D.W., 1997. Gender differences in the perception\nand use of e-mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model.\nMIS Quarterly, 21(4), 389-400.\n[30] Ghani, J., Supnick, R., Rooney, P., 1991. The experience of flow in\ncomputer-mediated and in face-to-face groups, Proceedings of the\n12th International Conference on Information Systems, 229-237.\n[31] Griffin, R.W., 1999. Management. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.\n[32] Guadagno, R.E., Okdie, B.M., Eno, C.A., 2008. Who blogs?\nPersonality predictors of blogging. Computers in Human Behavior,\n24(5), 1993-2004.\n[33] Hair, J.T., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., 1992.\nMultivariate Data Analysis with Readings, third ed. New York:\nMacmillan.\n[34] Hamburger, Y.A., Ben-Artzi, E., 2000. The relationship between\nextraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet.\nComputers in Human Behavior, 16(4), 441-449.\n[35] Harrison, A.W., Rainer, R.K., Jr., 1992. The influence of individual\ndifferences on skill in end-user computing. Journal of Management\nInformation Systems, 9(1), 93-111.\n[36] Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P., 1996. Marketing in hypermedia\ncomputer-mediated environment: conceptual foundations. Journal of\nMarketing, 60(3), 50-68.\n[37] Hong, W., Thong, J.Y.L., Wong, W.-M., Tam, K.Y., 2002.\nDeterminants of user acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical\nexamination of individual differences and system characteristics.\nJournal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 97-124.\n[38] Hsu, C. L. and Lin, J. C., 2008. Acceptance of blog usage: The roles\nof technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing\nmotivation, Information & Management, 45(1), 65-74.\n[39] Hsu, C.L., Lu, H.P., 2007. Consumer behavior in on-line game\ncommunities: a motivational factor perspective Computers in Human\nBehavior, 23, 1642-1659.\n[40] Igbaria, M., Gamers, T., Davis, G.B., 1995. Testing the determinants\nof microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of\nManagement Information Systems, 11(4), 87-114.\n[41] Igbaria, M., Iivari, J., 1995. The effects of self-efficacy on computer\nusage. Omega, 23(6), 587-605.\n[42] IP, R.K.F., Wagner, C., 2008, Weblogging: a study of social\ncomputing and its impact on organizations. Decision Support Systems,\n45(2), 242-250.\n[43] John, O.P., Donahue, E.M., Kentle, R.L., 1991. The Big Five\nInventory--version 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California,\nBerkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.\n[44] John, O.P., Srivastava, S., 1999. The Big Five trait taxonomy: history,\nmeasurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L.A. Pervin & O.P.\nJohn (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.,\npp. 102-138). New York: Springer.\n[45] Johnson, R.D., Marakas, G.M., 2000. Research report: The role of\nbehavior modeling in computer skills acquisition -- toward refinement\nof the model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 402-417.\n[46] Kim, H.N. (2008). The phenomenon of blogs and theoretical model of\nblog use in educational contexts. Computers & Education, 51(3),\n1342-1352.\n[47] Korukonda, A.R., 2007. Differences that do matter: a dialectic\nanalysis of individual characteristics and personality dimensions\ncontributing to computer anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior,\n23(4), 1921-1942.\n[48] Koufaris, M., 2002. Applying the technology acceptance model and\nflow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems\nResearch, 13(2), 205-223.\n[49] Kruglanski, A.W., Freund, T., 1983. The freezing and unfreezing of\nlay-inferences: effects on impressional primacy, ethnic, stereotyping,\nand numberical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,\n19(5), 448-468.\n[50] Landers, R.N., Lounsbury, J.W., 2006. An investigation of Big Five\nand narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage. Computers\nin Human Behavior, 22(2), 283-293.\n[51] Lin, C.P., Bhattacherjee, A., 2007. Extending technology usage\nmodels to interactive hedonic technologies: a theoretical model and\nempirical test. Information Systems Journal, doi:\n10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00265.x.\n[52] Marcoulides, G.A., 1989. Measuring computer anxiety: the computer\nanxiety scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49,\n733-738.\n[53] Moon, J., Kim, Y., 2001. Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web\ncontext. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230.\n[54] Nelson, D.L., 1990. Individual adjustment to information-driven\ntechnologies: a critical review. MIS Quarterly, 14(1), 79-98.\n[55] Novak, T.P., Hoffman, D.L., Yung, Y.-F., 2000. Measuring the\ncustomer experience in online environments: a structural modeling\napproach. Marketing Science, 19(1), 22-24.\n[56] Rotter, J.B., 1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus\nexternal control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80\n(Whole No. 609).\n[57] Shin, D.-H., 2007. User acceptance of mobile Internet: implication for\nconvergence technologies. Interacting with Computers, 19(4),\n472-483.\n[58] Thatcher, J.B., Perrewé, P.L., 2002. An empirical examination of\nindividual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer\nself-efficacy. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 381-396.\n[59] Vallerand, R.J., 1997. Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and\nextrinsic motivation. Advance Experiment Social Psychology, 29,\n271-360.\n[60] Van der Heijden, H. 2003. Factors influencing the usage of websites:\nthe case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information &\nManagement, 40, 541-549.\n[61] Van der Heijden, H., 2004. User acceptance of hedonic information\nsystems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695-704.\n[62] Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., 2000. A theoretical extension of the\ntechnology acceptance model: four longitudinal case studies.\nManagement Science, 46(2), 186-204.\n[63] Venkatesh, V., 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use:\nintegrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the\ntechnology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4),\n342-365.\n[64] Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., 1996. A model of the antecedents of\nperceived ease of use: development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3),\n451-481.\n[65] Wang, H.-Y., Wang, Y.-S., 2008. Gender differences in the perception\nand acceptance of online games. British Journal of Educational\nTechnology, 39(5), 787-806.\n[66] Wang, K.T., Huang, Y.-M., Jeng, Y.-L., Wang, T.-I, 2008. A\nblog-based dynamic learning map. Computers & Education, 51(1),\n262-278.\n[67] Wang, Y.-S., 2003. The adoption of electronic tax filing systems: an\nempirical study. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 333-352.\n[68] Wang, Y.-S., 2008. Assessing e-commerce systems success: A\nrespecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS\nsuccess. Information Systems Journal, 18(5), 529-557.\n[69] Wang, Y.-S., Wang, Y.-M., Lin, H.-H., Tang, T.-I., 2003. Determinants\nof user acceptance of Internet banking: an empirical study.\nInternational Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5),\n501-519.\n[70] Webster, J., Martocchio, J.J., 1992. Microcomputer playfulness:\ndevelopment of a measure with workplace implications. MIS\nQuarterly, 16(2), 201-226.\n[71] Widkipedia, 2008. Blog. Retrieved October 22, 2008, from\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Blog\n[72] Woszczynski, A.B., Roth, P.L., Segars, A.H., 2002. Exploring the\ntheoretical foundations of playfulness in computer interactions.\nComputers in Human Behavior, 18(4), 369-388.\n[73] Zmud, R.W., 1979. Individual differences and MIS success: a review\nof the empirical literature. Management Science, 25(10), 966-979."]}