151. Predictive genetic testing for neurodegenerative conditions: how should conflicting interests within families be managed?
- Author
-
Zornitza Stark, Jane Wallace, Lynn Gillam, Matthew Burgess, and Martin B. Delatycki
- Subjects
Male ,0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Health (social science) ,Genetic counseling ,Decision Making ,Emotions ,Genetic Counseling ,Commit ,030105 genetics & heredity ,Truth Disclosure ,Preimplantation genetic diagnosis ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) ,Pregnancy ,medicine ,Humans ,Family ,Genetic Predisposition to Disease ,Genetic Testing ,Physician's Role ,Psychiatry ,Predictive testing ,Preimplantation Diagnosis ,Genetic testing ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Conflict of Interest ,Health Policy ,Neurodegenerative Diseases ,Genetic Status ,Issues, ethics and legal aspects ,Harm ,Mutation (genetic algorithm) ,Female ,Psychology ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Predictive genetic testing for a neurodegenerative condition in one individual in a family may have implications for other family members, in that it can reveal their genetic status. Herein a complex clinical case is explored where the testing wish of one family member was in direct conflict to that of another. The son of a person at 50% risk of an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative condition requested testing to reveal his genetic status. The main reason for the request was if he had the familial mutation, he and his partner planned to utilise preimplantation genetic diagnosis to prevent his offspring having the condition. His at-risk parent was clear that if they found out they had the mutation, they would commit suicide. We assess the potential benefits and harms from acceding to or denying such a request and present an approach to balancing competing rights of individuals within families at risk of late-onset genetic conditions, where family members have irreconcilable differences with respect to predictive testing. We argue that while it may not be possible to completely avoid harm in these situations, it is important to consider the magnitude of risks, and make every effort to limit the potential for adverse outcomes.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF