Search

Background: Right ventricular extension of inferior myocardial infarction has been shown to be a predictor of poor prognosis during the acute phase. However, it is not known whether right ventricular dysfunction predicts long term complications. The aim of the present study was to assess whether right ventricular ejection fraction is also a predictor of poor prognosis during the first five follow-up years., Methods: Ninety-eight consecutive patients (age < or = 65 years) with acute noncomplicated myocardial infarction (49 anterior and 49 inferior) were evaluated before hospital discharge. In all of them the ejection fraction of both ventricles was evaluated with radionuclide ventriculography at rest and during submaximal exercise. All patients were clinically followed up for at least 5 years. The prognostic relevance of right and left ventricular function for the prediction of all complications and severe complications was assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis., Results: After 5 years, 66 patients had 94 complications (angina in 44, heart failure in 21, reinfarction in 10, revascularization procedures in 11, death in 6). In the univariate analysis, resting right ventricular ejection fraction was significantly lower in patients with inferior infarction and severe complications at one year (32 +/- 12% vs 38 +/- 6%, p = 0.03). However, in multivariate analysis only resting left ventricular ejection fraction was predictive of complications at 5 years (odds ratio 5.93, 95% confidence interval = 1.32-26.6). Statistical results did not change when the ejection fraction of both ventricles during submaximal exercise was considered., Conclusions: Although right ventricular ejection fraction, measured before hospital discharge, is predictive of complications at five years in inferior infarctions, multivariate analysis shows that it does not add prognostic information to the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction, either anterior or inferior.

Background: The aim of the present study was to assess the value of tomographic perfusion scintigraphy as a complement to coronary arteriography in the therapeutic management of patients admitted to the hospital for treatment of unstable ischaemic heart disease., Methods: A review was carried out of the discharge report of 100 consecutive patients (mean age 58 years, 19 females) in which there was a mention of having taken a therapeutic decision on the basis of coronary angiography and tomographic perfusion scintigraphy with 99m-technetium isonitriles under exercise and/or dipyridamole. In 90% of instances the study was performed during drug therapy after the patient had remained stable for at least 3 days. The indication of the studies and the type of therapy was made by the attending physician. Concordance between both studies was said to exist when both pointed to the same type of therapeutic approach, either medical treatment (nonsevere stenosis on coronary arteriography with mild ischaemia on scintigraphy) or revascularization (severe stenosis with moderate or severe ischaemia in tomographic scintigraphy). Discordance was said to be present when ischaemia was mild with severe stenosis on coronary angiography., Results: In 80 patients there was concordance between both studies regarding the subsequent therapeutic approach (medical treatment in 32 and revascularization in 48 [25 coronary angioplasty and 23 bypass surgery]). In the patients with discordance (n:20) medical treatment was decided in 14 patients on the basis of mild ischaemia with significant angiographic stenosis, and in only 6 patients revascularization (angioplasty in 5 and bypass surgery in 1) was indicated, based on the severity of coronary stenosis even if the ischaemia apparent on the scintigraphy was mild., Conclusions: Therefore, in 80% of patients admitted for unstable coronary artery disease there was a concordance between the results of tomographic scintigraphy and coronary angiography, when both studies were indicated to select the most appropriate therapeutic modality. In the 20% of discordant cases the attending physician decided on a conservative strategy in most cases, as no significant enough perfusion defect was shown on scintigraphy in spite of severe coronary artery stenosis.

The diagnostic yield of echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography (first pass and multiple gated) and contrast ventriculography was evaluated in 11 patients in whom a diagnosis of left ventricular pseudoaneurysm had been made during the last ten years. The diagnosis was made by two dimensional echocardiography (associated with Doppler in the last 5 patients) in 8 of 11 patients (sensitivity: 73%). The major limitation of the technique, in addition to the impossibility of an adequate recording due to a suboptimal acoustic window, is the poor definition of the neck of the pseudoaneurysm, particularly in the inferior localization. By contrast, echocardiography is the only technique which permits the direct visualization of thrombi within the pseudoaneurysm. Multiple gated radionuclide ventriculography was diagnostic in 7 of 10 patients (sensitivity: 70%). Its major limitations are the poorer spatial resolution to visualize the pseudoaneurysm neck and the thrombi within the cavity. First pass radionuclide ventriculography was diagnostic in 4 of 6 patients (sensitivity: 67%). In one of them it improved on the diagnostic yield of the multiple gated technique. Contrast ventriculography was diagnostic in 5 of 7 patients (sensitivity: 71%). The diagnosis was missed due to technical problems in one patient and to significant thrombosis within the pseudoaneurysm in another. Thus, none of the imaging studies has optimal sensitivity. Therefore, all play a complementary role in the diagnosis of ventricular pseudoaneurysm.