201. ACTR-13. A BAYESIAN ADAPTIVE RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL OF BEVACIZUMAB VERSUS BEVACIZUMAB PLUS VORINOSTAT IN ADULTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA FINAL RESULTS
- Author
-
Jihong Xu, Jing Wu, Tobias Walbert, Fabio M. Iwamoto, Vinay K. Puduvalli, Mark R. Gilbert, Nicholas Avgeropoulos, Howard Colman, W. K. Alfred Yung, Morris D. Groves, Nina Paleologos, Jimin Wu, Jeffrey Raizer, Marc C. Chamberlain, Marta Penas-Prado, Ryan Merrell, Terri S. Armstrong, Karen Fink, David M. Peereboom, David Tran, Pierre Giglio, and Ying Yuan
- Subjects
Oncology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,genetic structures ,Bevacizumab ,Phases of clinical research ,Abstracts ,03 medical and health sciences ,Antiangiogenesis Therapy ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Progression-free survival ,Vorinostat ,Temozolomide ,Surrogate endpoint ,business.industry ,eye diseases ,nervous system diseases ,sense organs ,Neurology (clinical) ,Histone deacetylase ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,medicine.drug - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab improves outcome and reduces symptoms in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). However, GBMs develop adaptive resistance to bevacizumab- mediated angiogenesis inhibition resulting in tumor recurrence. We hypothesized that vorinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, with pleotropic antiangiogenic effects, would delay emergence of resistance to bevacizumab therapy and improve clinical outcome. METHODS: In this multicenter phase II trial utilizing a novel Bayesian design, patients with recurrent glioblastoma were adaptively randomized to bevacizumab alone or bevacizumab+vorinostat based on a primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) such that patients had a higher likelihood of receiving the more efficacious treatment. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and quality of life assessment (MDASI-BT). Eligible patients were adults (≥ 18 yrs) with histologically confirmed GBMs recurrent after prior radiation and temozolomide therapy, adequate organ function, KPS≥ 60, and no prior bevacizumab/HDAC inhibitors. RESULTS: Ninety patients (bevacizumab+vorinostat:49, bevacizumab:41) were enrolled and 74 were evaluable for PFS (bevacizumab+vorinostat:44, bevacizumab:30). Grade 3 or greater toxicities in 85 evaluable patients included hypertension (n=37), neurological changes (n=2), anorexia (n=2), infections (n=9), wound dehiscence (n=2), DVT/PE (n=2), and colonic perforation (n=1). There was one treatment-related death due to pulmonary embolism. Upon multivariate analysis for bevacizumab+vorinostat vs bevacizumab, median PFS (3.7 vs. 3.9 months, p=0.94, HR 0.63 [95% CI 0.38, 1.06, p=0.08]) or median OS (7.8 vs. 9.3 months, p=0.64, HR 0.93 [95% CI 0.5, 1.6, p=0.79]) were not significantly different between the two arms. Ongoing analyses of patient reported outcomes (MDASI-BT) and plasma biomarkers will be reported. CONCLUSIONS: Combining bevacizumab with vorinostat did not result in improved PFS or OS compared with bevacizumab alone in patients with recurrent GBM. This trial is the first to test a Bayesian PFS-based adaptive randomized design in patients with primary brain tumors and demonstrates the feasibility of using adaptive randomization in a multicenter setting.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF