201. The role of semiquantitative evaluation of lympho-vascular space invasion in early stage cervical cancer patients.
- Author
-
Ronsini C, Anchora LP, Restaino S, Fedele C, Arciuolo D, Teodorico E, Bizzarri N, Zannoni GF, Ferrandina G, Scambia G, and Fanfani F
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Vessels pathology, Cervix Uteri blood supply, Cervix Uteri surgery, Disease-Free Survival, Feasibility Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lymph Nodes pathology, Lymphatic Metastasis pathology, Lymphatic Vessels pathology, Lymphatic Vessels surgery, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Invasiveness diagnosis, Neoplasm Invasiveness pathology, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local prevention & control, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment methods, Risk Factors, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms diagnosis, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms mortality, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms pathology, Young Adult, Cervix Uteri pathology, Lymphatic Metastasis diagnosis, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local epidemiology, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Objective: Lymph vascular space involvement (LVSI) is one of the most important prognostic factors in early stage cervical cancer. Its qualitative evaluation represents a milestone for patient risk stratification and treatment choice, but a semi-quantitative analysis of LVSI may offer a more truthful risk model, as already demonstrated for endometrial cancer. The present study aims to investigate the performances of a semi-quantitative evaluation of LVSI in terms of patient risk assessment., Methods: In this retrospective study were enrolled patients underwent surgical treatment for early cervical cancer from January 2009 to October 2018. A semi-quantitative evaluation such as the "three-tiered approach" was used to classify the LVSI pathway: negative vs. focal vs. diffuse., Results: Diffuse LVSI was found to be a risk factor for lymph node metastasis (OR: 9.844, p < 0.001), and parametrial involvement (OR: 5.566, p < 0.001). Lymph nodal recurrences were more frequent in diffuse LVSI group (LVSI negative vs. focal LVSI p = 0.369; LVSI negative vs. diffuse LVSI p = 0.002; Focal LVSI vs. diffuse LVSI p = 0.214); and so distant recurrences (LVSI negative vs. focal LVSI p = 0.623; LVSI negative vs. diffuse LVSI p = 0.002; Focal LVSI vs. diffuse LVSI p = 0.026). Patients with diffuse LVSI showed a worse disease-free survival (DFS) than patients with focal or absent involvement (DFS LVSI negative vs. focal LVSI p = 0.938; LVSI negative vs. diffuse LVSI p < 0.001; focal LVSI vs. diffuse LVSI p = 0.036)., Conclusion: Semi-quantitative evaluation of LVSI may be useful to identify risk patients for shorter disease-free survival and lymphatic and distant recurrences in patients with early stage., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF