201. Efficacy and safety of additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer.
- Author
-
Tao Chen, Yi-Qun Zhang, Wei-Feng Chen, Ying-Yong Hou, Li-Qing Yao, Yun-Shi Zhong, Mei-Dong Xu, Ping-Hong Zhou, Chen, Tao, Zhang, Yi-Qun, Chen, Wei-Feng, Hou, Ying-Yong, Yao, Li-Qing, Zhong, Yun-Shi, Xu, Mei-Dong, and Zhou, Ping-Hong
- Subjects
COLON cancer ,LYMPH nodes ,ENDOSCOPIC surgery ,SURGICAL excision ,SURGICAL complications ,COLON tumors ,LONGITUDINAL method ,METASTASIS ,RECTUM tumors ,REOPERATION ,RESEARCH funding ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,RETROSPECTIVE studies - Abstract
Background: Additional surgery is recommended when early colorectal cancer (ECRC) is resected by non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and there is significant risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of additional surgery after non-curative ESD for ECRC and evaluate long-term outcomes.Methods: Patients with ECRC who underwent ESD and additional surgery between July 2007 and November 2013 were identified. Histology and patient data were collected during an average period of more than 5 years to determine tumor stage and type, resection status, complications, tumor recurrence, and distant metastasis.Results: Fifty-one patients who underwent additional surgery were eligible for analysis. Overall, regional LNM was detected in 5 patients (9.8%) and presence of lymphovascular infiltration was a significant risk factor. Surgery-related complications occurred in 3 patients (5.9%). During a median follow-up period of 59 months, no metastasis or local recurrence was observed. Three patients died of other diseases and no CRC-related deaths took place.Conclusions: Additional surgery after non-curative ESD for ECRC is effective and safe and should be encouraged to foster curative treatment and better long-term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF