201. Knowledge translation and implementation in spinal cord injury: a systematic review.
- Author
-
Noonan, V K, Wolfe, D L, Thorogood, N P, Park, S E, Hsieh, J T, and Eng, J J
- Subjects
QUALITY assurance ,BEHAVIOR modification ,CINAHL database ,MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems ,PSYCHOLOGY information storage & retrieval systems ,EVALUATION of medical care ,MEDLINE ,ONLINE information services ,PROFESSIONS ,RESEARCH funding ,SPINAL cord injuries ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,KNOWLEDGE management ,DECISION making in clinical medicine - Abstract
Objective:To conduct a systematic review examining the effectiveness of knowledge translation (KT) interventions in changing clinical practice and patient outcomes.Methods:MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO were searched for studies published from January 1980 to July 2012 that reported and evaluated an implemented KT intervention in spinal cord injury (SCI) care. We reviewed and summarized results from studies that documented the implemented KT intervention, its impact on changing clinician behavior and patient outcomes as well as the facilitators and barriers encountered during the implementation.Results:A total of 13 articles featuring 10 studies were selected and abstracted from 4650 identified articles. KT interventions included developing and implementing patient care protocols, providing clinician education and incorporating outcome measures into clinical practice. The methods (or drivers) to facilitate the implementation included organizing training sessions for clinical staff, introducing computerized reminders and involving organizational leaders. The methodological quality of studies was mostly poor. Only 3 out of 10 studies evaluated the success of the implementation using statistical analyses, and all 3 reported significant behavior change. Out of the 10 studies, 6 evaluated the effect of the implementation on patient outcomes using statistical analyses, with 4 reporting significant improvements. The commonly cited facilitators and barriers were communication and resources, respectively.Conclusion:The field of KT in SCI is in its infancy with only a few relevant publications. However, there is some evidence that KT interventions may change clinician behavior and improve patient outcomes. Future studies should ensure rigorous study methods are used to evaluate KT interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF