201. Analysis of vocal and swallowing functions after horizontal glottectomy.
- Author
-
Topaloğlu İ, Bal M, Salturk Z, Berkiten G, and Atar Y
- Subjects
- Aged, Case-Control Studies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Deglutition physiology, Deglutition Disorders etiology, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Laryngectomy methods, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications etiology, Treatment Outcome, Voice physiology, Voice Disorders etiology, Deglutition Disorders physiopathology, Glottis surgery, Laryngectomy adverse effects, Postoperative Complications physiopathology, Voice Disorders physiopathology
- Abstract
We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess vocal and swallowing functions after horizontal glottectomy. Our study population was made up of 22 men aged 45 to 72 years (mean: 58.3) who underwent horizontal glottectomy and completed at least 1 year of follow-up. To compare postoperative results, 20 similarly aged men were included as a control group; all glottectomy patients and all controls were smokers. We used three methods-acoustic and aerodynamic voice analyses, the GRBAS (grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenicity, and strain) scale, and the voice handicap index-30 (VHI-30)-to assess vocal function objectively, perceptually, and subjectively, respectively. We also assessed swallowing function objectively by fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and subjectively with the M.D. Anderson dysphagia inventory (MDADI). The 22 patients were also subcategorized into three groups according to the extent of their arytenoid cartilage resection, and their outcomes were compared. Acoustic and aerodynamic analyses showed that the mean maximum phonation time was significantly shorter and the fundamental frequency was significantly lower in the glottectomy group than in the controls (p = 0.001 for both), and that the mean jitter and shimmer values and the mean harmonics-to-noise ratio were all significantly higher (p = 0.001 for all); there were no significant differences among the three arytenoid subgroups. Self-assessments revealed that there were no statistically significant differences among the three subgroups in GRBAS scale scores except for the breathiness score (p = 0.045), which was lower in the arytenoid preservation subgroup than in the total resection subgroup; there were no statistically significant differences among the three subgroups in VHI-30 scores. Finally, swallow testing found no statistically significant differences in FEES scores or MDADI scores. We conclude that horizontal glottectomy caused a deterioration in vocal function, but swallowing function was satisfactory.
- Published
- 2016