201. Pregnancy of unknown location: a consensus statement of nomenclature, definitions, and outcome
- Author
-
Dirk Timmerman, Kurt T. Barnhart, Norah M. van Mello, Thomas A. Molinaro, Tom Bourne, George Condous, Emma Kirk, Karine Chung, R. Husicka, Ben Van Calster, Ben W.J. Mol, Mary D. Sammel, Steven R. Goldstein, Katherine L. O’Flynn O’Brien, Petra J. Hajenius, C. Bottomley, APH - Amsterdam Public Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Other Research, Obstetrics and gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D), and Pediatric surgery
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Consensus ,Statement (logic) ,Population ,Disease ,Global Health ,Intrauterine pregnancy ,Article ,Ultrasonography, Prenatal ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Pregnancy ,Risk Factors ,Terminology as Topic ,Medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,education ,Gynecology ,education.field_of_study ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,Ectopic pregnancy ,business.industry ,Obstetrics ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,medicine.disease ,Outcome (probability) ,3. Good health ,Pregnancy, Ectopic ,Natural history ,Reproductive Medicine ,Female ,business - Abstract
Objective: To improve the interpretation of future studies in women who are initially diagnosed with a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL), we propose a consensus statement with definitions of population, target disease, and final outcome. Design: A review of literature and a series of collaborative international meetings were used to develop a consensus for definitions and final outcomes of women initially diagnosed with a PUL. Result(s): Global differences were noted in populations studied and in the definitions of outcomes. We propose to define initial ultrasound classification of findings into five categories: definite ectopic pregnancy (EP), probable EP, PUL, probable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), and definite IUP. Patients with a PUL should be followed and final outcomes should be categorized as visualized EP, visualized IUP, spontaneously resolved PUL, and persisting PUL. Those with the transient condition of a persisting PUL should ultimately be classified as nonvisualized EP, treated persistent PUL, resolved persistent PUL, or histologic IUP. These specific categories can be used to characterize the natural history or location (intrauterine vs. extrauterine) of any early gestation where the initial location is unknown. Conclusion(s): Careful definition of populations and classification of outcomes should optimize objective interpretation of research, allow objective assessment of future reproductive prognosis, and hopefully lead to improved clinical care of women initially identified to have a PUL. (Fertil Steril (R) 2011; 95: 857-66. (C) 2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
- Published
- 2011