Search

Aim: To assess nonoperative management (NOM) of uncomplicated appendicitis (UC-appy) in children to determine factors influencing prognosis and review the literature. Materials and Methods: All UC-appy cases presenting younger than 16 years between 2015 and 2018 who had NOM (one dose of intravenous analgesia and intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam 112.5 mg/kg 8 hourly) and were followed up for at least 3 months were reviewed prospectively (n = 146). Perceived pain and fever were assessed 12 hourly, biochemistry daily. If predetermined cutoff results were not achieved at each assessment, NOM was abandoned and urgent laparoscopic appendectomy (ULA) performed. Results: NOM succeeded in 48.6% (S-NOM; n = 71) and failed in 51.4% (F-NOM; n = 75). Mean age at presentation (10.7 ± 2.5 versus 8.6 ± 3.7 years old; P < .0001) and duration of preadmission fever (1.0 ± 0.9 versus 2.1 ± 1.2 days; P < .0001) were the only significantly different criteria between S-NOM and F-NOM. Optimal cutoff values using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were 7.0 years old (32% sensitivity and 93% specificity) and 1.0 day (95% sensitivity and 25% specificity), respectively. NOM was abandoned for persistent pain, prolonged fever, or raised white blood count at 12 hours in 20/75 (26.7%), 24 hours in 31/75 (41.3%), 36 hours in 14/75 (18.7%), and 48-72 hours in 10/75 (13.3%). At ULA, perforation was identified in 14/75 (18.7%). Complications arising within 3 months of ULA were residual abscess (n = 7/75; 9.3%) and transient ileus (n = 1/75; 1.3%). Conclusion: It would appear that surgery may be more appropriate for children with UC-appy when they are younger and febrile before admission for longer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: We conducted a prospective non‐randomized comparison of children with uncomplicated appendicitis treated either by primary laparoscopic appendectomy (PLA) or by non‐operative management (NOM) followed by interval laparoscopic appendectomy (ILA) if NOM was successful or emergency laparoscopic appendectomy (ELA) if NOM was unsuccessful. Methods: Before 2015, all patients with uncomplicated appendicitis underwent PLA using a standard three‐port technique. Postoperatively, piperacillin/tazobactam was administered until the white blood cell count was less than 10 000/μL and patients were afebrile. Since 2015, in cases of uncomplicated appendicitis, intravenous analgesia has been administered once after assessment, and then NOM has been immediately employed, with repeat doses of piperacillin/tazobactam administered every 8 h after admission. We have also used standard management cut‐off criteria to determine when to perform laparoscopic appendectomy after NOM: if NOM fails, ELA is performed within 6 h, and if NOM is successful, ILA is planned. Results: There were 103 eligible subjects for this study. Eleven cases of suspected complicated appendicitis were excluded, leaving 34 PLA cases and 58 NOM cases. After NOM, 27 patients were treated with ILA and 31 with ELA. There was one recurrence after successful NOM, and in two cases, patients' parents refused to consent to ILA after successful NOM. There were more perforations and significantly more residual abscesses in ELA than in PLA. Operative time and postoperative hospitalization were significantly longer among ELA patients than among PLA patients, and operative time was significantly shorter during ILA than in PLA. Conclusion: Further evaluation is required to confirm which patients will benefit most from NOM and what role PLA has in treating uncomplicated appendicitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: It has long been considered surgical dogma that the length of the shared common wall (CW) between a fistula and the urethra in males with anorectal malformation (ARM) and rectourethral bulbar fistula (RUBF) is considerably longer than in males with ARM and rectourethral prostatic fistula (RUPF). This belief has led surgeons who perform laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) for RUPF to avoid LAARP for RUBF for risk of potential injury to the urethra or incomplete removal of the fistula. In this study, we compared CW between RUBF and RUPF using distal colostography (DCG) and direct intraoperative measurements.Methods: DCG of rectourethral fistula patients (n = 63; RUBF: n = 44; RUPF: n = 19) were used to measure CW retrospectively. Results were expressed as a ratio of the height of L4; i.e., CW:L4. If less than 0.7, the CW was classified as being "short"; if 0.71-1.4, as being "medium"; and if greater than 1.41, as being "long". CW that could not be measured was classified as indeterminate. 24 of these patients also had CW measured intraoperatively during LAARP as previously described. The results obtained using both techniques were also compared.Results: Surprisingly, CW:L4 in RUBF patients was short in 47.7%, medium in 27.3%, long in 20.5%, and indeterminate in 4.5% on DCG, equivalent to mean lengths of 7 mm, 8.5 mm, and 10.3 mm obtained using direct intraoperative measurement for short, medium, and long CW:L4 categories, respectively. CW:L4 in RUPF was short in 73.6%, medium in 10.5%, and long in 5.2% on DCG, while mean intraoperative measurements were 5 mm, 7 mm, and 10 mm, respectively. Differences in CW measured intraoperatively were not significantly different between RUBF and RUPF (p = NS).Conclusion: From our findings, 47.7% of CWs in RUBF were short using two independent methods, with only 20.5% being long. Thus, LAARP should be considered actively for treating selected RUBF cases and not be excluded on the basis of CW length. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: During transanal pull-through (TAPT) for Hirschsprung's disease (HD), exposing the entire surgical anal canal (SAC) including the squamo-columnar junction, or anorectal line (ARL) is a crucial step for minimizing problematic postoperative bowel function. We present a hint for exposing the entire SAC.Method: Histologically, the ARL represents the junction of proximal unilayer columnar colorectal mucosa with distal stratified squamous epithelium and is the proximal limit of the SAC. It is an obvious landmark; proximal mucosa is vivid pink and distal mucosa is more whitish. We use the Lone Star (LS) self-retaining retractor system to expose the ARL. Before we attach the LS hooks to the anal sinuses on the dentate line full-circle, we place 3/0 sutures at 0, 3, 6, and 9 o'clock around the anus to expose the anal sinuses. If the patient's buttocks cannot be positioned as described or the patient is too high on the table, the LS ring does not sit well, resulting only in dilatation and lengthening of the SAC without prolapse. By hanging the patient's buttocks 5 cm over the end of the table, the LS ring sits snugly and the ARL and entire SAC prolapse to the anal verge.Results: Good positioning, as described, greatly facilitated dissection in 61/68 TAPT cases, while poor exposure hindered treatment in 7/68.Conclusion: Thorough exposure of the entire SAC, which is crucial for adequate TAPT, is greatly facilitated by patient positioning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) has become routine for repairing pediatric inguinal hernia (IH). Reports on the effective repair of IH in challenging cases, such as extremely low birth weight infants (ELBWI) who become symptomatic soon after birth and have surgery before 1 year of age, are rare; and conventional herniotomy (CH) in ELBWI requires extensive experience of neonatal surgery. We compared LPEC with CH for treating ELBWI with IH.Methods: Consecutive ELBWI with IH treated by either LPEC (n = 17) or CH (n = 22) before 1 year of age between 2012 and 2017 were reviewed. LPEC were performed by consultant pediatric surgeons (CPS; n = 3) with experience of at least 200 cases each. In CH, 11 cases were treated by CPS and 11 by CPS-supervised surgical trainees.Results: There were no intraoperative complications. Operative time and anesthesia time for bilateral IH repairs were both shorter in LPEC. Postoperative sequelae were recurrence (LPEC; n = 1; repaired by redo LPEC 2 months after the initial repair) and intravenous rehydration (CH; n = 1; for persistent post-anesthetic vomiting). Recovery was unremarkable in all cases without additional analgesia.Conclusion: LPEC would appear to be a viable option for treating IH in ELBWI, especially bilateral cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]