Search

c-kit functions as a tyrosine kinase receptor and represents a target for small molecule kinase inhibitors. The expression pattern for c-kit was studied in different human tumor types to their correlation with prognosis. Paraffin-embedded tumor tissues from 282 patients were analyzed immunohistochemically for c-kit expression. Survival and follow-up data were available from 192/282 (68%) patients. c-kit immunopositivity was found in 62/282 (22%) cases. c-kit expression was found in 14/83 (17%) colorectal cancers, in 13/62 (21%) breast cancers, in 7/20 sarcomas (35%), in 5/14 (36%) renal cell carcinomas, in 2/12 ovarian cancers (17%) and in 2/12 (17%) hepatocellular carcinomas. We found no significant correlation between c-kit expression and prognosis although a trend to a worse prognosis in patients with c-kit positive tumors could be observed. Expression of c-kit was found in tumor samples with varying intensities and infrequently.

New blood vessel formation (angiogenesis) is not only essential for the growth of solid tumors but there is also emerging evidence that progression of hematological malignancies like multiple myeloma, acute leukemias, and myeloproliferative neoplasms, also depends on new blood vessel formation. Anti-angiogenic strategies have become an important therapeutic modality for solid tumors. Several anti-angiogenic agents targeting angiogenesis-related pathways like monoclonal antibodies, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and proteasome inhibitors have been entered clinical trials or have been already approved for the treatment of hematological malignancies as well and in some instances these pathways have emerged as promising therapeutic targets. This review summarizes recent advances in the basic understanding of the role of angiogenesis in hematological malignancies and clinical trials with novel therapeutic approaches targeting angiogenesis.

Background: PTK787/ZK 222584 (PTK/ZK) offers a novel approach to inhibit tumour angiogenesis., Patients and Methods: This study characterized the safety, tolerability, biological activity and pharmacokinetic profile of PTK/ZK, while determining the optimum dose. Seventy-one patients with advanced cancer were enrolled to receive once daily dosing. Pharmacokinetic, dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and safety assessments were performed, along with measurement of soluble markers. Patients were treated until they had unacceptable toxicity and/or disease progression., Results: Twenty-nine patients were assessable for maximum tolerated dose (MTD) determination, but no MTD was established; only two patients experienced dose limiting toxicities. PTK/ZK was well tolerated with only nine patients experiencing serious adverse events suspected to be PTK/ZK related, but no objective tumour response was observed; 34% had stable disease and 48% had progressive disease. In addition, PTK/ZK was rapidly absorbed with a maximum concentration occurring 2 hours post-dosing. Vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblastic growth factor were good predictors of best tumour response, as was the MRI bidirectional transfer constant on day 2 of treatment., Conclusion: An MTD was not reached in this study but, based on these data and findings from other studies, 1200 mg was found to be the optimum dose of PTK/ZK for patients with advanced cancer.

Purpose: BIBF 1120 is an oral, potent angiokinase inhibitor targeting receptors of the vascular endothelial growth factors, platelet-derived growth factors, and fibroblast growth factors. This phase I, accelerated titration study assessed the maximum tolerated dose, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic effects of BIBF 1120., Patients and Methods: Sixty-one patients with advanced cancers received BIBF 1120 in successive cohorts. Twenty-five received 50 to 450 mg once daily and 36 received 150 to 300 mg twice daily in 4-week treatment courses interspersed by 1 week of washout. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging assessed antiangiogenic effect in 42 patients., Results: Most frequent BIBF 1120-related adverse events were mostly mild to moderate (Common Toxicity Criteria grade 1-2) nausea (68.9%), vomiting (45.9%), and diarrhea (44.3%). The majority of dose-limiting adverse events of Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 or 4 were reversible liver enzyme elevations. The maximum tolerated dose was 250 mg of BIBF 1120 for once and twice daily dosing. BIBF 1120 was absorbed moderately fast (t(max) = 1-3 hours at steady state), with no deviation from dose linearity and no decrease of exposure over time. The gMean terminal half-life was from 13 to 19 hours. One complete and two partial responses occurred in patients with renal cell cancer (n = 2) and colorectal cancer (n = 1). Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showed a significant reduction in tumor blood flow in 55% of evaluable patients., Conclusions: BIBF 1120 dosed continuously displayed a favorable safety and pharmacokinetics profile, and first efficacy signals were observed. Twice daily dosing permitted increased drug exposure without additional toxicity. Two hundred milligrams BIBF 1120 twice daily is the recommended dose for phase II monotherapy studies.

Background: Vandetanib is a once-daily oral inhibitor of VEGFR, EGFR and RET signaling pathways. In patients with advanced colorectal cancer and liver metastases, the effect of vandetanib on tumor vasculature was assessed using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)., Methods: Eligible patients received vandetanib 100 or 300 mg/day. DCE-MRI (iAUC(60 )and K(trans)) was used to quantify the primary endpoints of tumor perfusion and vascular permeability. An exploratory assessment of tumor oxygenation was performed using MRI/T2*. All MRI parameters were measured at baseline (twice) and on days 2, 8, 29 and 57., Results: Twenty-two patients received vandetanib (n = 10, 100 mg; n = 12, 300 mg). Baseline measurements of iAUC(60 )and K(trans )were reproducible, with low intrapatient coefficients of variation (11% and 24%, respectively). Estimates of mean % changes from baseline were -3.4% (100 mg) and -4.6% (300 mg) for iAUC(60), and -4.6% (100 mg) and -2.7% (300 mg) for K(trans); these changes were not significantly different between doses. The exploratory T2* measurement showed a significant increase at 300 mg versus 100 mg (P = 0.006). Both doses of vandetanib were generally well tolerated; common toxicities were fatigue, rash and diarrhea (majority CTC grade 1 or 2). The pharmacokinetic profile of vandetanib was similar to that observed previously. There were no RECIST-defined objective responses; five patients experienced stable disease >/=8 weeks., Conclusion: In this study in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, vandetanib did not modulate gadolinium uptake in tumor vasculature and tissue measured by the DCE-MRI parameters iAUC(60 )and K(trans)., Trial Registration: NCT00496509 (ClinicalTrials.gov); D4200C00050 (AstraZeneca).

Background: Bendamustine is a drug with a favorable side effect spectrum and it offers a chance to overcome tumor resistance in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC)., Patients and Methods: Bendamustine was given as flat dose with 200 mg at days 1 + 2 in MBC patients pretreated with 2-3 different chemotherapies. Therapy was repeated at day 28 or fully recovered neutrophils. After 2 treatment cycles, a tumor response evaluation was performed. Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (NCI-CTC) catalogue., Results: 22 patients were evaluated for toxicity. 4 patients dropped out before the first tumor response evaluation; thus, 18 patients were evaluable for anticancer efficacy evaluation. 3/18 patients reached a partial remission (PR), 4 stable disease and 11 showed progression after 2 treatment cycles. The time to progression (TTP) was 5 months in patients with PR and 4 months in patients with no change (NC). In patients with progressive disease (PD), TTP was < 2 months. The main toxicities were nausea, weight loss and fatigue., Conclusions: Bendamustine can be given with a fixed flat dose, which simplifies the drug preparation. 2/5th of all treated patients responded to this therapy whereas bendamustine showed no anticancer effect in 3/5th of all patients. Bendamustine is definitely a drug with anticancer potential.

Purpose: The (6-maleimidocaproyl)hydrazone derivative of doxorubicin (DOXO-EMCH) is an albumin-binding prodrug of doxorubicin with acid-sensitive properties that shows superior antitumor efficacy in murine tumor models and a favorable toxicity profile in mice, rats, and dogs compared with doxorubicin. The purpose of the phase I study was to characterize the toxicity profile of DOXO-EMCH, establish a recommended dose for phase II studies, and assess potential anticancer activity., Experimental Design: A starting dose of 20 mg/m2 doxorubicin equivalents was chosen. Forty-one patients with advanced cancer disease were treated with an i.v. infusion of DOXO-EMCH once every 3 weeks at a dose level of 20 to 340 mg/m2 doxorubicin equivalents., Results: Treatment with DOXO-EMCH was well tolerated up to 200 mg/m2 without manifestation of drug-related side effects. Myelosuppression (grade 1-2) and mucositis (grade 1-2) were the predominant adverse effects at dose levels of 260 mg/m2 and myelosuppression (grade 1-3) as well as mucositis (grade 1-3) were dose limiting at 340 mg/m2. No cardiac toxicity was observed. Of 30 of 41 evaluable patients, 12 patients (40%) had progressive disease, 15 patients (57%) had stable disease, and 3 patients (10%) had a partial remission., Conclusions: DOXO-EMCH showed a good safety profile and was able to induce tumor regressions in tumor types known to be anthracycline-sensitive tumors, such as breast cancer, small cell lung cancer, and sarcoma. The recommended doxorubicin equivalent dose for phase II studies is 260 mg/m2.

Purpose: This single-centre, open-label, phase I dose-escalation study was performed to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, combined with irinotecan, a cytotoxic agent, in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours., Patients and Methods: In an initial dose-escalation phase, patients received irinotecan 125 mg/m(2) and sorafenib 100, 200 and 400 mg twice daily (bid) (cohorts 1-3). In an extended phase, colorectal cancer (CRC) patients received fixed-dose irinotecan 140 mg and sorafenib 400 mg bid (cohort 4)., Results: Thirty-four patients were treated: 20 in the dose-escalation phase (common tumour types: CRC [45%], ovarian [5%], pancreatic [5%]) and 14 patients in the CRC extension. Frequent drug-related adverse events were gastrointestinal symptoms, dermatological reactions and constitutional symptoms. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Generally, concomitant administration of irinotecan had no impact on the PK of sorafenib. Sorafenib 100 or 200 mg bid had no impact on the PK of irinotecan or its metabolite SN38. In contrast, sorafenib 400 mg bid significantly increased irinotecan and SN38 exposures; however, this was not associated with increased toxicities. Stable disease was achieved in 12/20 (60%) evaluable patients in cohorts 1-3, and 10/13 (77%) evaluable patients in cohort 4. A further patient from cohort 4 had a partial response of >200 days. The increase of SN38 exposure might be due to inhibition of formation of the SN38 glucuronide by sorafenib. In vitro, sorafenib strongly inhibited SN38 glucuronidation in human liver microsomes as indicated by a K(i) value of 2.7 micromol/l., Conclusion: Sorafenib 400 mg bid can be combined with irinotecan 125 mg/m(2) or 140 mg for the treatment of patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours, although monitoring for toxicity is recommended.

To explore retrospectively the relationships between paclitaxel pharmacokinetics and three known, non-synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in SLCO1B3, the gene encoding organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B3. Accumulation of [(3)H]paclitaxel was studied in Xenopus laevis oocytes injected with cRNA of Oatp1b2, OATP1A2, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OAT1, OAT3, OCT1, and NTCP. The 334T>G (Ser112Ala), 699G>A (Met233Ile), and 1564G>T (Gly522Cys) loci of SLCO1B3 were screened in 475 individuals from five ethnic groups and 90 European Caucasian cancer patients treated with paclitaxel. Only OATP1B3 was capable of transporting paclitaxel to a significant extent (P=0.003). The 334T>G and 699G>A SNPs were less common in the African-American and Ghanaian populations (P<0.000001). Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were not associated with the studied SNPs or haplotypes (P>0.3). The studied SNPs in SLCO1B3 appear to play a limited role in the disposition of paclitaxel, although their clinical significance in other ethnic populations remains to be investigated.

Here, we evaluated the relationships between ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein, MDR1) polymorphisms and paclitaxel (Taxol)-induced toxicity and pharmacokinetics. Twenty-six patients were assessable for pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics, 22 for neurotoxicity and 18 for myelotoxicity. Patients carrying two reference alleles for the ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphism trended toward a reduced risk to develop neuropathy as compared to patients carrying at least one variant allele (P=0.09). Additionally, patients who were homozygous variant at the 2677 and 3435 loci had a significantly greater percent decrease in absolute neutrophil count at nadir (P=0.02). Neither polymorphism correlated with paclitaxel pharmacokinetics. This pilot study suggests that paclitaxel-induced neuropathy and neutropenia might be linked to inherited variants of ABCB1 through a mechanism that is unrelated to altered plasma pharmacokinetics.

Cumulative peripheral neuropathy (PNP) still remains a limitation to optimal treatment with paclitaxel (PAC), especially in more dose-dense schedules. This primary sensory PNP may affect the majority of patients after administration of certain cumulative dosages of PAC, while the exact mechanisms of PAC-induced PNP are not known. While a number of preclinical models revealed its vehicle Cremophor EL (CrEL) to be mainly responsible for ganglionopathy, axonopathy and demyelination, clinical data also supports a strong and independent effect of PAC itself, which is most likely based on disturbances in the microtubules in perikaryons, axons and glia cells. Indeed, clinical trials of CrEL-free formulations of PAC still report grade III neurotoxicity as dose-limiting. As treatment options of PAC-induced PNP are rare the use of specific scoring systems for screening purposes is strongly encouraged. In this report we review and discuss the pathogenesis, incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, pharmacodynamics and treatment options for PAC-induced PNP.

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the effects of six known allelic variants in the CYP2C8, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 genes on the pharmacokinetics of the anticancer agent paclitaxel (Taxol)., Experimental Design: A cohort of 97 Caucasian patients with cancer (median age, 57 years) received paclitaxel as an i.v. infusion (dose range, 80-225 mg/m(2)). Genomic DNA was analyzed using PCR RFLP or using Pyrosequencing. Pharmacokinetic variables for unbound paclitaxel were estimated using nonlinear mixed effect modeling. The effects of genotypes on typical value of clearance were evaluated with the likelihood ratio test within NONMEM. In addition, relations between genotype and individual pharmacokinetic variable estimates were evaluated with one-way ANOVA., Results: The allele frequencies for the CYP2C8*2, CYP2C8*3, CYP2C8*4, CYP3A4*3, CYP3A5*3C, and ABCB1 3435C>T variants were 0.7%, 9.2%, 2.1%, 0.5%, 93.2%, and 47.1%, respectively, and all were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The population typical value of clearance of unbound paclitaxel was 301 L/h (individual clearance range, 83.7-1055 L/h). The CYP2C8 or CYP3A4/5 genotypes were not statistically significantly associated with unbound clearance of paclitaxel. Likewise, no statistically significant association was observed between the ABCB1 3435C>T variant and any of the studied pharmacokinetic variables., Conclusions: This study indicates that the presently evaluated variant alleles in the CYP2C8, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 genes do not explain the substantial interindividual variability in paclitaxel pharmacokinetics.

Background: Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were shown to be related to toxicity and survival., Patients and Methods: We evaluated the effects of time above paclitaxel concentrations of 0.05 micromol/l (T(>0.05) and systemic exposures (AUC) to total and unbound paclitaxel (tPAC, uPAC) on response in patients with advanced cancer treated with weekly 1-h or 3-h infusions., Results: After 6 weeks of therapy (WOT), 13 out of 21 assessable patients showed either partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD), while 8 had progressive disease (PD). As compared to patients with PD, those with PR or SD showed similar AUCs to uPAC and tPAC but higher (p < 0.05) T (>0.05). Patients with T(>0.05) > or = 20.7 hours had lower probability (p < 0.05) to progress within 12 WOT., Conclusion: Taking the heterogeneity of the studied tumor types into account, we found T(>0.05) to be associated with response to treatment. This emphasizes the value of threshold models for the investigation of paclitaxel pharmacodynamics.

Purpose: In this study, two doses of temsirolimus (CCI-779), a novel inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, were evaluated for efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had been heavily pretreated., Patients and Methods: Patients (n = 109) were randomly assigned to receive 75 or 250 mg of temsirolimus weekly as a 30-minute intravenous infusion. Patients were evaluated for tumor response, time to tumor progression, adverse events, and pharmacokinetics of temsirolimus., Results: Temsirolimus produced an objective response rate of 9.2% (10 partial responses) in the intent-to-treat population. Median time to tumor progression was 12.0 weeks. Efficacy was similar for both dose levels but toxicity was more common with the higher dose level, especially grade 3 or 4 depression (10% of patients at the 250-mg dose level, 0% at the 75-mg dose level). The most common temsirolimus-related adverse events of all grades were mucositis (70%), maculopapular rash (51%), and nausea (43%). The most common, clinically important grade 3 or 4 adverse events were mucositis (9%), leukopenia (7%), hyperglycemia (7%), somnolence (6%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and depression (5%)., Conclusion: In heavily pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, 75 and 250 mg temsirolimus showed antitumor activity and 75 mg temsirolimus showed a generally tolerable safety profile.

Purpose: The shortening of infusion time from 3 to 1 hour decreases the systemic exposure (area under the curve, AUC) of total and unbound paclitaxel but increases the AUC of its vehicle Cremophor EL, whereas the time above total paclitaxel concentrations of 0.05 micromol/L (T >0.05) remains almost constant. As both Cremophor EL and paclitaxel are neurotoxic, we evaluated their pharmacodynamic effects on the development of peripheral neuropathy as the most important nonhematologic toxicity., Experimental Design: Patients with advanced cancer of different origin were randomized to receive a maximum of 12 weekly-given 1- or 3-hour infusions of 100 mg/m2 paclitaxel (Taxol). Twenty-four patients were assessable for both pharmacokinetics and peripheral neuropathy development evaluated by a clinical scoring system including sensory symptoms, strength, tendon reflexes, and vibratory sense., Results: Patients with peripheral neuropathy development (n=14) received more weeks of therapy (P=0.056) and showed significantly higher T(>0.05) (P=0.022) and overall systemic drug exposures (weeks of therapy x AUC) for total paclitaxel (P=0.002) and unbound paclitaxel (P=0.003) than those without peripheral neuropathy. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, T(>0.05) > or = 10.6 hours (P=0.023), AUC of total paclitaxel > or = 4.7 microg/mL x hour (P = 0.047), and AUC of unbound paclitaxel > or = 0.375 microg/mL x hour (P = 0.095) were identified as being potential factors for peripheral neuropathy development. In a Cox regression analysis, only T(>0.05) > or = 10.6 hours remained as an independent risk factor (relative risk, 18.43; P = 0.036) after adjusting for prior vincamycin (relative risk, 11.28; P = 0.038)., Conclusions: From the results obtained in this study, it is concluded that exposure to paclitaxel but not Cremophor EL is associated with peripheral neuropathy development.

The family of VEGF receptors are important mediators of angiogenesis, which is essential for tumour growth and metastasis. PTK/ZK is a multiple VEGF receptor inhibitor that blocks the activity of all known VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases. This phase I/II trial evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of PTK/ZK in patients with liver metastases from solid tumours. Patients were administered oral PTK/ZK monotherapy once daily at doses of 300-1200 mg/day in 28-day cycles until unacceptable toxicity or tumour progression occurred. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled and treatment with PTK/ZK was generally well tolerated. The most frequently reported adverse events were fatigue, nausea, dizziness, and vomiting (mostly National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 1 or 2). The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of PTK/ZK increased between 300 and 1000 mg/day with no further increase from 1000 to 1200 mg/day; the AUC decreased by 50% between day 1 and day 15. The DCE-MRI showed a statistically significant early reduction of tumour blood supply (measured as Ki) at day 2 at doses > or = 750 mg/day. Disease progression was significantly correlated with percent change from baseline Ki. Thirteen patients had stable disease for at least two cycles (56 days). Median overall survival was 11.8 months (95% CI = 6.6, 17.1 months). Long-term therapy with PTK/ZK demonstrated predictable pharmacokinetics, was safe and feasible in patients with metastatic disease, and showed promising clinical activity. The minimum biologically active dose was established at 750 mg/day whereas the recommended dose for phase III studies is 1200 mg/day.

Background: Plasma and serum biomarkers of angiogenesis and activated endothelial cells were evaluated to assess biological activity of PTK787/ZK 222584 (PTK/ZK), a novel oral angiogenesis inhibitor targeting all known vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinases., Patients and Methods: Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) (n=63) were enrolled into two phase I/II dose escalation trials of PTK/ZK in 28-day cycles until discontinuation. Patients with stable disease for > or =2 months were categorized as 'non-progressors'. Plasma markers of angiogenesis, VEGF-A and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and the serum markers of activated endothelial cells, sTIE-2 and sE-Selectin, were assessed at baseline, and pre-dose on days 1, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of every cycle, with additional assessments 10 h post-dose on days 1 and 15. The percentage change from baseline was subsequently correlated with AUC and C(max) of PTK/ZK on day 1, cycle 1 and clinical outcome., Results: A dose-dependent increase in plasma VEGF-A and bFGF was observed in the first cycle of PTK/ZK treatment. The correlation of change in plasma VEGF-A with AUC and C(max) was characterized by an E(max) model, suggesting that a change of > or =150% from baseline VEGF-A correlated with non-progressive disease. Change from baseline plasma VEGF-A within the first cycle of treatment was significantly correlated with clinical outcome by logistic regression analysis (P=0.027)., Conclusions: In patients with CRC treated with PTK/ZK, changes in plasma VEGF-A and bFGF demonstrate biological activity of PTK/ZK, may help to establish optimal dose and correlate with outcome.

Purpose: Liposomal encapsulation of doxorubicin is designed to increase safety and tolerability by decreasing cardiac and gastrointestinal toxicity through decreased exposure of these tissues to doxorubicin, while effectively delivering drug to the tumor. We conducted an open-label phase I study to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of a single dose of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (Myocet) in patients with various solid tumors. Safety and tolerability were monitored., Experimental Design: Patients received a single intravenous infusion of Myocet 75 mg/m2. Plasma samples were analyzed for concentration of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin, total doxorubicin, and doxorubicinol., Results: A total of 18 patients aged 20-73 years (median 60 years) participated; 17 were evaluable for pharmacokinetic analysis. The most common primary tumor was soft tissue sarcoma (22%). Total body clearance for total doxorubicin was 5.6 l/h/m2 while the volume (Vss) was 82 l/m2. The terminal half-life was 52.6 h. Based on the AUC and Cmax values for total doxorubicin and encapsulated doxorubicin, an estimated 85% of circulating doxorubicin was encapsulated. Doxorubicinol was detected in all patients; the mean AUC was 2.03+/-1.10 micromol/l/h. The mean 48-h urinary excretion of doxorubicin was 6.44% of the dose. The most common adverse events were nausea (94%), fatigue (78%) and vomiting (67%). Cardiotoxicity (measured as ten-point fall in LVEF to <50%) was observed in one patient. Pharmacokinetic values did not correlate with hematological, laboratory or demographic variables., Conclusions: The pharmacokinetic profile of Myocet suggests that the liposomal formulation results in a longer half-life with less free drug available for tissue distribution than conventional doxorubicin, consistent with the enhanced therapeutic index observed in clinical studies.

This article reviews the available data regarding the acticity of postoperative adjuvant systemic therapy for colorectal cancer as first and second-line treatment in metastatic disease. The efficacy of adjuvant treatment of patients with stage III colorectal cancer is well established. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folic acid over 6 months (still) represent todays standard and should serve as comparison in randomized studies. The risk of relapse is low in stage II colon carcinoma and consequently the efficacy is relatively small compared to stage III. New investigation indicate, Capecitabene has the potential to replace 5-FU/FS as standard treatment for patients with colon cancer. Efficacy results are expected to be available in 2004. In metastatic disease combination of 5-FU/folic acid plus CPT-11 or OXA are treatment of choice for the first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. FOLFOX is high-dose intensity oxaliplatin added to the simplified bimonthly leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil regimen as second- line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. It resulted in prolongation of the median progress free survival from 6,8 to 8,8 months and increased the survival for 4,5 months. New perspectives are novel chemotherapeutic and targeted agents in metastatic colorectal cancer: For the first time, there has been a targeted therapy shown convincingly to prolong survival for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer in a well-performed Phase III trial. This agent is bevacizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody targeting the circulating proangiogenic growth factor vascular endothelial growth factor. Results with bevacizumab should lead to rapid expansion of the number of strategies targeting tumour neovasculature. Additionally, an antibody against the epidermal growth factor, cetuximab, has been shown to have both single-agent activity and the potential ability to partially reverse resistance to a chemotherapy drug. These advancements, as well as data on other novel treatment agents that have been studied specifically in patients with colorectal neoplasms, are discussed in detail.

Background: The aim of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and pharmacokinetics of the camptothecin glycoconjugate BAY 38-3441, administered as an infusion for 30 min on two separate schedules every 3 weeks., Patients and Methods: A total of 81 patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with BAY 38-3441 either at doses of 20, 40, 67, 100, 140, 210, 315, 470 and 600 mg/m2/day for 1 day every 3 weeks (single-dose schedule), or at doses of 126, 189, 246, 320 and 416 mg/m2/day once daily for three consecutive days every 3 weeks (3-day schedule). Plasma sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacokinetics of BAY 38-3441 and camptothecin with these schedules., Results: DLTs included renal toxicity, granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia on the single-day schedule at doses > or = 470 mg/m2/day, and diarrhea and thrombocytopenia on the 3-day schedule at doses > or = 320 mg/m2/day. Other non-DLTs were gastrointestinal, dermatological and hematological. Pharmacokinetics of BAY 38-3441 and camptothecin appear to be dose-dependent, but not linear., Conclusions: Renal toxicity was dose-limiting for BAY 38-3441 using 30-min infusions on the single-dose schedule. Dose escalation to 470 mg/m2/day is feasible using a 2-h infusion. However, because of the superior safety profile, we recommend the 3-day schedule for BAY 38-3441 at a dose of 320 mg/m2/day as 30-min infusions for further phase II studies., (Copyright 2004 European Society for Medical Oncology)

BBR 3576 is a novel aza-anthrapyrazole with limited potential for cardiotoxicity in preclinical models. This phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the pharmacokinetic profile of BBR 3576 administered i.v. as a 1-h infusion repeated every 4 weeks. In total, 27 patients were treated at doses starting from 1 to 150 mg/m2. The dose levels 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 90, 125 and 150 mg/m2 were investigated in one, three, one, three, two, one, three, four, three and six patients, respectively. The DLT was a grade 3 stomatitis at 150 mg/m2. At this dose level as well as at 125 mg/m2, neutropenia grade 3 and 4 were frequently seen, but not reaching the criteria for DLT. Time to neutrophil nadir was about 2 weeks and recovery took place within 1 week. Other bone marrow toxicities were mild; lymphopenia was also observed. No significant drug-induced cardiotoxicity was observed. The plasma concentration versus time curves of BBR 3576 showed a biexponential profile with a linear kinetic behavior. A very large volume of distribution, a high plasma clearance and long elimination half-lives were calculated. Renal unchanged drug excretion was less than 10% and therefore a minor excretion route. No objective antitumor responses were found. On the basis of this study, the recommended dose for phase II studies is 150 mg/m2, although the maximum tolerated dose as per protocol definition was not reached. This trial showed that BBR 3576 has a manageable toxicity profile on a 4-week schedule. Phase II studies have started in patients with solid tumors, as suggested by preclinical data in different in vivo model systems.

ScFv(FRP5)-ETA is a recombinant single-chain antibody-toxin with binding specificity for ErbB2/HER2. Previously potent antitumoral activity of the molecule against ErbB2 overexpressing tumor cells was demonstrated in vitro and in animal models. Here we report on the first application of scFv(FRP5)-ETA in human cancer patients summarizing case reports collected in four different clinical centers. Eleven patients suffering from metastatic breast and colorectal cancers and from malignant melanoma were treated on a compassionate-use basis by intratumoral injection of scFv(FRP5)-ETA into cutaneous lesions once daily for 7-10 days. Total daily doses ranged from 60 to 900 microg, and total doses per treatment cycle ranged from 0.6 to 6.0 mg. Treatment caused injected tumors to shrink in six of the 10 cases evaluated (60%). Complete regression of injected tumor nodules was accomplished in four patients (40%) and partial reduction in tumor size in another two patients (20%). Adverse reactions were restricted to local symptoms such as pain and inflammation at injection sites which were fully reversible. Only in one patient treated at the highest daily doses systemic liver toxicity of grade 2 was observed and treatment was discontinued on day 7. No hematologic, renal, and/or cardiovascular toxicities were noted. Our results demonstrate that local therapy with scFv(FRP5)-ETA can be effective against ErbB2 expressing tumors justifying further clinical development of this reagent.

We evaluated the effects of weekly short infusions of paclitaxel (PAC) on the development of a peripheral neuropathy (PNP) as primary endpoint. Patients with advanced cancer were randomized to a weekly regimen of PAC (100 mg/m2) infused over 1 versus 3 h. PNP was evaluated by a clinical score including sensory symptoms, strength, tendon reflexes and vibratory sense (range 0-12; PNP >3 points). Kaplan-Meier-type curves were calculated. In total, 22 study centers enrolled 121 patients, 92 assessable for analysis. The probability to exceed a PNP score of 3 increased from 0.20 versus 0.30 after six to 0.68 versus 0.47 after 12 administrations (1 versus 3 h: p = 0.66). After 12 weeks of therapy only a quarter of assessable patients were free of PNP. Cox analysis yielded a relative risk of 1.10 for 1-h infusions (p = 0.80). We observed a rapid increasing risk of PNP manifestation in the course of weekly PAC administrations without significant differences between 1- and 3-h infusions. This is in contrast to pharmacokinetic observations indicating that a shortening of infusion time might enhance neurotoxicity by increasing the AUC of Cremophor. A majority of patients experiencing neurotoxic effects require the investigation of potential nerve protectors in future clinical trials accompanying PAC therapy.

Purpose: PTK787/ZK 222584 (PTK/ZK), an orally active inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinases, inhibits VEGF-mediated angiogenesis. The pharmacodynamic effects of PTK/ZK were evaluated by assessing changes in contrast-enhancement parameters of metastatic liver lesions using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated in two ongoing, dose-escalating phase I studies., Patients and Methods: Twenty-six patients had DCE-MRI performed at baseline, day 2, and at the end of each 28-day cycle. Doses of oral PTK/ZK ranged from 50 to 2000 mg once daily. Tumor permeability and vascularity were assessed by calculating the bidirectional transfer constant (Ki). The percentage of baseline Ki (% of baseline Ki) at each time point was compared with pharmacokinetic and clinical end points., Results: A significant negative correlation exists between the % of baseline Ki and increase in PTK/ZK oral dose and plasma levels (P =.01 for oral dose; P =.0001 for area under the plasma concentration curve at day 2). Patients with a best response of stable disease had a significantly greater reduction in Ki at both day 2 and at the end of cycle 1 compared with progressors (mean difference in % of baseline Ki, 47%, P =.004%; and 51%, P =.006; respectively). The difference in % of baseline Ki remained statistically significant after adjusting for baseline WHO performance status., Conclusion: These findings should help to define a biologically active dose of PTK/ZK. These results suggest that DCE-MRI may be a useful biomarker for defining the pharmacological response and dose of angiogenesis inhibitors, such as PTK/ZK, for further clinical development.

Purpose: Aim of this study was to characterize the difference in pharmacokinetics (PK) of paclitaxel (PAC) after 1-h and 3-h infusion in humans and to define a pharmacodynamic relationship between PAC PK and myelotoxicity., Patients and Methods: PAC PK were studied during the first PAC application in the first treatment cycle (1 treatment cycle = 6 PAC applications) in 25 patients. This patient group represents a subgroup of a large clinical study with neurotoxicity as primary endpoint. These 25 patients were those patients who were willing to give additional blood samples. The group size was sufficient for a full description of the PK of PAC. PAC was administered at 100 mg/m(2) weekly by 1-h (n = 12) or 3-h (n = 13) infusion to patients with advanced cancer (lung, breast, ovarian, cervix, and head and neck). Total PAC was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental and model-dependent methods. The leukocyte and neutrophil decrease during a 6-week treatment period was calculated by the percentage in decrease of white blood cell count (WBC) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) as well as the area over the curve (AOC) of WBC and ANC., Results: The area under the curve (AUC), the plasma clearance (Clp), the volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)), the mean residence time (MRT) and the distribution half-life (t(1/2)) of PAC(tot) were not different in the two application modes. The elimination half-life (t1/2) and maximum plasma concentration C(max) were significantly different. No significant differences in the percentage of reduction of WBC and ANC were seen. Calculation of AOC of WBC showed a borderline significant difference (p = 0.0547) in case of WBC and no significant difference in case of ANC between the two PAC schedules. A considerable variance of AOC was observed., Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic study of total PAC of the two schedules investigated showed significant differences in the elimination half-life, which is longer in case of the 1-h infusion of PAC and in the maximum plasma concentration, which is higher in case of the 1-h infusion. The two schedules showed a similar myelotoxicity with a trend of less toxicity in the 1-h procedure., (Copyright 2002 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg)

We performed a phase I study combining gemcitabine and interferon (IFN)- 2b in patients with advanced solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended doses for phase II trials. Five dose levels of gemcitabine (mg/m )/IFN- (x10 IU) were planned: 500/5, 1000/5, 1000/7, 1000/10 and 1200/10. Gemcitabine was given once weekly and IFN 3 x weekly for 3 consecutive weeks followed by 1 week of rest (28-day cycles). Between February 1997 and June 1999, 21 patients with advanced pancreatic ( =3), ovarian ( =1), renal ( =10) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; =7) were enrolled. The MTD was reached at gemcitabine 1000 mg/m and IFN- 7 x 10 IU, with two of three patients having dose-limiting toxicity (thrombocytopenia). The predominant hematologic toxicities (grade 3/4) were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (13 and five patients, respectively). Three patients had moderate neutropenic fever and one had grade 4 AST/ALT; none required hospitalization. Of the 18 evaluable patients, responses included one partial response (NSCLC) and 10 stable diseases (eight renal cancer). We conclude that the recommended phase II study regimen is gemcitabine 1000 mg/m and IFN- 5 x 10 IU, every 28 days. The results, particularly those in metastatic renal carcinoma, are encouraging and worthy of further evaluation in phase II trials.

Purpose: The paclitaxel vehicle Cremophor EL (CrEL) profoundly influences the cellular distribution of paclitaxel in human blood in vitro by a concentration-dependent decrease of the unbound drug fraction. Because CrEL clearance increases by extending the infusion duration from 3 to 24 hours, we hypothesized that exposure to unbound paclitaxel might also be schedule-dependent., Patients and Methods: CrEL and unbound paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were prospectively analyzed in 29 patients with advanced solid tumors treated with paclitaxel 100 mg/m(2) given as a 1-hour (n = 15) or 3-hour (n = 14) intravenous infusion., Results: The systemic exposure (area under the curve [AUC]) to CrEL was significantly higher with the 1-hour as compared with the 3-hour schedule (80.2 +/- 24.2 v. 48.5 +/- 24.1 microL x h/mL; P =.002). In contrast, the AUC of unbound paclitaxel was substantially reduced after the 1-hour infusion (0.50 +/- 0.10 v. 0.62 +/- 0.12 micromol/L x h; P =.009). Similarly, clearance and volume of distribution were significantly dependent on infusion duration (P <.005). A trend was observed toward more severe hematologic toxicity with the 3-hour schedule (P =.053), consistent with increased exposure to unbound drug., Conclusion: Overall, these findings explain, at least in part, previous observations that short-infusion schedules of paclitaxel lack significant myelotoxicity, whereas potentially CrEL-related side effects, including peripheral neuropathy, are augmented.

The systemic anticancer drug therapy is indicated in the adjuvant as well as in the palliative setting. There is an indication for an adjuvant therapy in case of Dukes B (stadium II) as well as in Dukes C (stadium III) colon cancer. An indication in the palliative setting remains for the Dukes D (stadium IV) colon cancer patients. Locoregional chemotherapeutical approaches represent no standard procedure and cannot be recommended outside clinical trials because the real value of this therapy is unknown due to a lack of large randomized trials. The mainstay of treatment of colon cancer is 5-Fluoruracil (5-FU), which should be combined with folinic acid in case of bolus (2-4 min. injection) therapy. In the adjuvant situation the Mayo scheme administered over a period of half a year remains the standard of choice because this procedure is validated by large randomized trials and replaces the combination 5-FU + levamisol given over a period of one year in former times. In the palliative situation 5-FU based therapy remains the goldstandard although more options than 5-FU plus folinic acid are now available. Oxaliplatin and irinotecan are approved for the treatment of metastatic colon cancer in first line in combination with 5-FU. Capecitabine and Ralitrexed are drugs, which are approved outside of Germany and can be used as well if indicated. The median survival of patients with metastatic colon cancer is between 12 and 18 month. It will be discussed in which way this range depends on the chemotherapeutical strategy.

Scientifically sound clinical research is an undispensable prerequisite to establish innovative therapeutic principles, to support applications for marketing authorization of proprietary new drugs, to advance therapeutic results in cancer therapy, and the only route towards an evidence-based clinical oncology at the advent of the 21st century. Treatment of cancer patients based on scientific evidence derived from clinical studies outperforms compassionate individual therapeutic decisions with a lack of evidence, whenever such evidence is available or whenever a clinical trial is addressing the clinical situation that must be addressed for an individual patient. A stable trend towards improved survival of cancer patients was first observed in 1999. The advent of new technologies of drug design, the integration of pharmacology, genomics and DNA microarray chip technologies will produce a myriad of new anticancer drugs with promising potential for cancer therapy that need to be tested in the clinical setting without delay. To match that challenge, clinical oncology must streamline the laborious process of conducting clinical trials. The process of planning, multicenter coordinating, recruiting, treatment, analyzing, and reporting of clinical trial results must be further optimized. The best possible quality control of all steps of that process is a prerequisite to motivate patients to participate in clinical trials of cancer therapy - always one of the most promising treatment options for patients seeking the best possible cancer care. At the same time as the internet goes mainstream and cancer care information is ubiquitously laymanized and dispersed via cancer cybermedicine, clinical researchers may employ the internet to exchange information, facilitate conduction of clinical trials, and facilitate recruitment to clinical studies via web-based trial registries. This will be more than an incremental step forward to deliver the best possible clinical care towards the ultimate goal: to deliver evidence-based medicine en route to a cure for more cancer patients than ever., (Copyright 2001 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg)

The biological control of angiogenesis is critical to the clinical control of cancer. Understanding the mechanism of formation and regulation of new blood vessel development would open a new avenue for cancer treatment. Intense research effort has revealed a variety of factors which initiate, control and terminate the multi-stage process of angiogenesis, as well as target structures which interfere with this process. Protease inhibitors, inhibitors of the endothelial cell proliferation, suppressors of angiogenic growth factors, copper chelators, and other compounds interfering with the process of angiogenesis were screened for inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and some of them are in clinical trials. Very recently, a new term, 'metronomic dosing regimen' has been introduced, which implicates the use of the old cytostatic anticancer agents as anti-angiogenic agents. Results from recent studies will be discussed briefly and the prospects of inhibition of tumor angiogenesis as a new treatment modality will be outlined. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Cremophor EL (CrEL) is a castor oil surfactant used as a vehicle for formulation of a variety of poorly water-soluble agents, including paclitaxel. Recently, we found that CrEL can influence the in vitro blood distribution of paclitaxel by reducing the free drug fraction, thereby altering drug accumulation in erythrocytes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical pharmacokinetics of CrEL, and to examine inter-relationships of paclitaxel disposition, infusion duration and CrEL kinetics. The CrEL plasma clearance, studied in 17 patients for a total of 28 courses, was time dependent and increased significantly with prolongation of the infusion duration from 1 to 3 to 24 h (p<0.03). An indirect response model, applied based on use of a Hill function for CrEL concentration-dependent alteration of in vivo blood distribution of paclitaxel, was used to fit experimental data of the 3 h infusion (r2=0.733; p=0.00001). Simulations for 1 and 24 h infusions using predicted parameters and CrEL kinetic data revealed that both short and prolonged administration schedules induce a low relative net change in paclitaxel blood distribution. Our pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model demonstrates that CrEL causes disproportional accumulation of paclitaxel in plasma in a 3 h schedule, but is unlikely to affect drug pharmacokinetics in this manner with alternative infusion durations.

Purpose: To characterize the disposition of paclitaxel (PAC) after a 1-h infusion in humans and define if possible a pharmacodynamic relationship between PAC disposition and the observed toxicity., Patients and Methods: PAC pharmacokinetics were studied in 43 courses of therapy in 30 patients (30 first course, 13 PK third course). PAC was administered at 150, 175, 200, 225 and 250 mg/m2 by a 1-h infusion to patients with advanced cancer (lung, breast, ovarian, cervix, and head and neck). PAC was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental and model-dependent methods., Results: Increases in the area under the curve and the peak plasma concentration were not proportional to increases in the dose. However, the deviation from linearity is rather moderate. The dose-limiting toxicity was central neuropathy which was not associated with pharmacokinetic deviations. Owing to the absence of grade 3 or 4 myelotoxicity, no clear correlation between this toxicity and pharmacokinetic parameters could be established., Conclusion: Within the evaluated dose range of the 1-h infusion there was only a moderate nonlinear disposition of PAC in humans and therefore a dose of 225 mg/m2 is recommended as safe. The observation of central neuropathy could not be directly related to a pharmacokinetic parameter. The complexity of the formulation which included Cremophor EL and ethanol may offer an explanation for the observed central neurotoxicity.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of as well as the quality of life under treatment with 5-fluorouracil (CAS 51-21-8, 5-FU) combined with parenteral GBE 761 ONC (i.e. the ginkgo biloba special extract EGb 761) in patients with pancreatic cancer. Forty-eight patients with locally or metastatic advanced pancreatic cancer were treated within a phase II study. The treatment was repeated every three weeks until progression. Response to therapy was evaluated after 2 and 4 treatment courses. Thirty-two patients were evaluable for response. Progressive disease was observed in 22 (68.8%) patients, no change in 7 (21.9%) patients and partial response in 3 (9.4%) patients (overall response = 9.4%). GBE 761 ONC was well tolerated. Adverse events which occurred during the study consisted mainly of myelosuppression and gastrointestinal symptoms and were judged as 5-FU-related or consisted of liver toxicity, respectively, and were judged as tumour-related. These results suggest a good benefit-risk ratio of the combination of 5-FU and GBE 761 ONC in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. In comparison with the results of studies with either 5-FU or gemcitabine as single agents the combination of 5-FU/GBE 761 ONC shows comparable response rates. The toxicity of the 5-FU/GBE 761 ONC combination was low. This combination therapy therefore warrants further clinical investigation, such as a controlled clinical trial against 5-FU or gemcitabine monotherapy.

Cremophor EL (CrEL) is a polyoxyethylated castor oil surfactant used in the intravenous formulation of the anticancer drug paclitaxel (Taxol). Quantitative determination of CrEL in patient samples can be achieved by complexation of the compound with the Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 dye in protein-free extracts [Sparreboom, A., Loos, W. J., Verweij, J., De Vos, A. I., Van der Burg, M. E. L., Stoter, G., and Nooter, K., Anal. Biochem. 255, 171-175 (1998)]. A disadvantage of this method of CrEL determination is that the assay plot of absorbance at 595 nm, the peak wavelength of the CrEL-dye complex, versus the concentration of the surfactant is not linear. The present study shows that the nonlinearity is associated with a decrease in the free dye concentration and a reduction in complex formation by increasing the CrEL concentration. By measurement of the ratio of absorbances at the maxima of the red (450 nm) and blue charge forms (595 nm) of Coomassie brilliant blue G-250, a full-scale linear relationship can be obtained over the entire range studied (0.500 to 10.0 microliter/mL). Validation data revealed that transformation of the detection procedure exhibits significantly improved specificity, accuracy(

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) is one of the most important new drugs used in the treatment of solid tumors. Use of paclitaxel, however, is associated with some toxicity. The main adverse side effects include myelotoxicity, neurotoxicity, hypersensitivity reactions, and asthenia. Toxicity seems to be schedule dependent. Currently, paclitaxel is routinely administered via 3- or 24-hour infusions. This study was performed to evaluate the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of a 1-hour infusion. Thirty-four patients with incurable solid tumors were included. Dose levels were escalated from 150 to 250 mg/m2. Thirty-four patients received a total of 105 courses of paclitaxel. The dose-limiting toxicity was World Health Organization grade 3 neuropathy at a dose of 250 mg/m2 in two of three patients. Two patients were not evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity because treatment was stopped after fewer than three courses due to disease progression. Neither had experienced a dose-limiting toxicity. Other toxicities were World Health Organization grade 1/2 neutropenia, asthenia, myalgia, arthralgia, and grade 1 hypersensitivity. Twenty-one patients were evaluable for preliminary anticancer efficacy. A partial response was observed in five patients (24%), stable disease in three (14%), and progressive disease in 13 (62%). The maximum tolerated dose was established at 250 mg/m2. A dose of 225 mg/m2 is recommended for further phase II trials. There was considerable interindividual and some intraindividual variability in pharmacokinetic parameters. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were linear up to 225 mg/m2, while a slightly overproportional increase in the peak plasma concentration and the area under the concentration-time curve was observed at 250 mg/m2, suggesting that paclitaxel's pharmacokinetic characteristics may be nonlinear at higher doses.

NK 611 is a new podophyllotoxin derivative in which a dimethyl amino group replaces a hydroxyl group at the sugar moiety of etoposide. This results in profound physico-chemical differences: NK 611 is much less hydrophobic than etoposide. Preclinical studies have shown that NK 611 is advantageous in terms of bioavailability and of the potency of its anticancer activity. A clinical phase I study was performed in cancer patients within the framework of the AIO. Additionally, its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were investigated. NK 611 was given to 26 patients at doses ranging from 60 to 140 mg/m2 [maximum tolerated dose (MTD) 120 mg/m2] in a 30-min infusion. Plasma and urine samples were collected from 25 patients and analyzed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay procedure. The concentration versus time curve of total NK 611 in plasma samples was best described by a three-compartment model. The overall median pharmacokinetic values were as follows (ranges are given in parentheses): mean residence time (MRT) 16.5 (5.4-42.3)h, terminal half-life 14.0 (8.2-30.5)h, volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)) 11.4 (7.9-18.1) l/m2 and plasma clearance (Cl(p)) 15.1 (3.6-36.4) ml min-1 m-2. The total systemic drug exposure, represented by the area under the curve (AUC), varied between 53.4 and 532.0 micrograms ml-1 h. The mean AUC (+/- SD) increased with the dose from 78.7 +/- 3.7 micrograms ml-1 h at 60 mg/m2 up to 202.8 +/- 157.2 micrograms ml-1 h at 120 mg/m2. The mean urinary excretion (UE) fraction of unchanged drug at 48 h after the end of the infusion varied between 3.0% and 25.8% of the total dose delivered. Analysis of ultrafiltrate samples showed a protein binding of approx.. 99%. The percentage reduction in white blood cells (WBC) and neutrophils (ANC) correlated with the dose, AUC, and AUC(free). The best relationship between the percentage of reduction in ANC and a pharmacokinetic parameter (AUC) took a nonlinear Hill-type form. The laboratory parameter for kidney or liver function did not correlate with the AUC. The variation of pharmacokinetic parameters within each dose level was profound. The reason for this pharmacological behavior remains unclear and should be investigated in further studies.

A two-step reverse-transcriptase-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with nested primer pairs was developed to amplify sensitive and specific cytokeratin-19 (CK-19) mRNA sequences from human breast cancer cells. No CK-19 pseudogene interference was seen. The larger DNA-derived amplification products could be clearly discriminated from mRNA-derived products. The CK-19 message was not amplified from bone marrow or blood of healthy volunteers and patients with haematological malignancies nor from myeloid and lymphoid cell lines. Breast cancer cells were diluted in buffy coat cells up to 10(-6) and CK-19 mRNA sought by PCR. The CK-19 message was detected in 14 of 26 blood samples and 14 of 24 marrow samples but in neither of two peripheral blood stem cell samples taken from 35 breast cancer patients. By sequence-analysis control of two of these samples and two cell lines, the amplified DNA fragments were confirmed to be homologous with the CK-19 sequence. The CK-19 message was further sought in matched blood/marrow samples taken from 13 untreated women in the same cohort at the time of diagnosis. In 3 of these, CK-19 RNA was detected in blood and marrow and, in 3 others, only in blood, but never in marrow alone. The results show that CK-19 assay by reverse transcriptase/PCR is a sensitive and specific technique for the detection of cancer cells in bone marrow and blood. It could be helpful in diagnosis and monitoring of metastatic breast cancer and detection of micrometastases. This should be evaluated on larger numbers of patients, with different clinical samples and epithelial malignancies.

The outcome of 14 bone marrow transplants (BMT) (autologous 4; allogeneic 10) for Philadelphia-chromosome (Ph1) positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) was analyzed. Preparative regimens consisted of etoposide (VP16) (30 or 45 mg/kg BW) (n = 14), cyclophosphamide (CY)(120 mg/kg BW) (n = 14), and total body irradiation (TBI)(12 Gy) (n = 13) or busulfan (Bu)(16 mg/kg) (n = 1). All patients receiving autologous marrow were in complete remission (CR) (three patients in 1.CR, one patient in 2.CR) at the time of BMT. For allogeneic BMT (nine related, one unrelated donor), seven patients were in first CR, two patients in first refractory relapse, and one patient in second relapse. With a median follow-up of 503 days (range 93-1522 days), eight out of 14 patients are alive in remission (six out of 10 patients receiving allogeneic, and two out of four patients receiving autologous BMT). Disease-free survival for all patients is 46%. Causes of death were relapse (n = 3) and transplant-related toxicity (n = 3). All patients tested for the bcr/abl rearrangement by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were negative 4 weeks post-BMT. Two of the three patients who subsequently relapsed were repeatedly RT-PCR positive prior to relapse (test not done in the third). Considering the negligible cure rate of Ph1-positive ALL with conventional chemotherapy regimens, our data support the concept of early (> or = 1 CR) BMT (allogeneic > autologous (purged) following triple therapy with TBI, VP16, and CY.

Resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy is a major problem in the management of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Various data suggest P-glycoprotein-associated multidrug resistance (MDR) to be a relevant resistance mechanism in this tumor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate feasibility and activity of combining oral dexverapamil, a second-generation chemosensitizer currently in clinical development for MDR reversal, with epirubicin in patients with epirubicin-refractory high-risk metastatic breast cancer. Patients first received epirubicin alone at 120 mg/m2. In cases of clinical refractoriness, epirubicin was continued at the same dose and schedule but supplemented with oral dexverapamil. Dexverapamil was given at 300 mg every 6 h for a total of 13 doses and commenced 2 days prior to epirubicin administration. At the time of this interim analysis, 41 patients had received epirubicin alone and 20 proceeded to treatment with epirubicin plus dexverapamil. Of the 20 patients, 14 were considered evaluable for toxicity and activity. Addition of dexverapamil resulted in a significant decrease in mean heart rate and blood pressure as well as prolongation of PQ time as compared to epirubicin alone. However, these cardiovascular effects of dexverapamil were usually mild, and subjective tolerance of treatment was good. In 7/14 patients, dose escalation of dexverapamil was feasible. Dexverapamil had no effect on epirubicin toxicities and did not require reduction of the epirubicin dose. In 2/14 patients, the addition of dexverapamil to epirubicin was able to convert progressive disease and no changes respectively, into partial responses. In 3 patients with progressive disease, addition of dexverapamil temporarily prevented further tumor progression. Analyses of dexverapamil and nor-dexverapamil plasma levels, of in vitro reversal activity of patient sera containing dexverapamil, and of epirubicin pharmacokinetics without and with dexverapamil are currently in progress. Addition of oral dexverapamil to epirubicin 120 mg/m2 proved to be feasible in a multiinstitutional setting. Patient accrual is continuing to determine whether dexverapamil is capable of overcoming epirubicin refractoriness in a significant number of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

The introduction of VP-16 into high-dose therapy regimens used for conditioning before BMT or PBSCT has resulted in higher remission rates and prolonged disease-free survival, even in high risk patients. VP-16 levels have been measured in plasma at the time of transplantation. The question is, is there a biological activity that corresponds with the risk of delayed engraftment or graft failure? We investigated the inhibitory effects of plasma samples obtained from patients under high-dose VP-16 therapy on the growth of human bone marrow progenitor cells. Bone marrow cells from healthy donors were exposed to the plasma samples and seeded into methylcellulose-culture (CFU-C-assay). We found a dose dependent CFU-C inhibition related to VP-16 plasma levels at the time of transplantation (k = 0.769, P < 0.01). There were signs of a correlation between CFU-C growth inhibition at the time of BMT and haematological recovery (k = 0.656, P < 0.05) between CFU-C inhibition and the time until leucocytes reached 0.2 x 10(9)/l. Patients with CFU-C growth inhibition at the time of BMT may show delayed engraftment of leucocytes and that there might be a correlation with VP-16 levels, but further investigation is necessary to determine the significance of the latter thesis and if VP-16 plasma levels could lead to failure of engraftment. We recommend a minimum time interval between VP-16 infusion and graft transplantation of 72 h.

VP-16 was administered in high doses (30-45 mg/kg) in combination with busulfan (BU) and cyclophosphamide (CY). The anticancer activity of VP-16 is thought to be schedule-dependent. We investigated a 6-h and a 34-h infusion of VP-16 to compare pharmacokinetic parameters and toxicity. Blood samples were taken from a total of 16 patients during infusion time (6 h and 34 h, respectively) and thereafter up to 2 days after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). VP-16 concentrations were measured in all plasma samples with HPLC technique and electrochemical detection and the results were analyzed with a pharmacokinetic data analysis system. All calculated pharmacokinetic parameters in the two patient groups were essentially similar. There were no statistically significant differences in half-lives, mean residence time, volume of distribution, total clearance and area under the curve. The treatment-related toxicity was not different between groups. The major difference was the maximal concentration in the case of 6-h infusions (122 +/- 35 micrograms/ml) and in the case of 34-h infusions (23.2 +/- 4.9 micrograms/ml) and the duration of VP-16 concentrations with > 10 and > 1 microgram/ml. Drug levels above these thresholds were always longer in case of 34-h infusions. In 8 of 16 patients VP-16 concentrations were measured in plasma samples at the time of BMT ranging from 80 to 820 ng/ml. The two different schedules for VP-16 administration, either given as a 6-h infusion or as a 34-h infusion, are bioequivalent in pharmacokinetic terms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

In the scope of a pharmacokinetic and dose-finding study 33 patients received instillations of idarubicin in 11 different doses 1 h before scheduled transurethral resection of bladder cancer. The dose was increased continuously from 5 to 30 mg and the concentration from 0.25-1.5 mg/ml. Idarubicin uptake into tissue was measured along with the serum level. The results showed a clear correlation of the tissue levels with dose and concentration. A significantly higher concentration of idarubicin was measured in the tumor in comparison with the mucosa. Absorption into the muscle was minimal and serum levels were low. Systemic toxicity was not observed, but there were signs of local toxicity in 50% of the subjects. Cytotoxic concentrations in the mucosa were reached at doses of over 15 mg and concentrations of over 0.5 mg/ml. A phase-II study is in preparation.