201. Rasch analysis to evaluate the motor function measure for patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy
- Author
-
Karlien Mul, Catharina G. Faber, Ingemar S. J. Merkies, Baziel G.M. van Engelen, Corinne G.C. Horlings, RS: MHeNs - R1 - Cognitive Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Klinische Neurowetenschappen, and MUMC+: MA Med Staf Spec Neurologie (9)
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,030506 rehabilitation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Motor function ,Measure (mathematics) ,behavioral disciplines and activities ,RESPONSIVENESS ,03 medical and health sciences ,outcome measures ,0302 clinical medicine ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,motor function measure ,Activities of Daily Living ,medicine ,Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy ,Humans ,Patient group ,HEALTH-STATUS ,Rasch model ,business.industry ,Rehabilitation ,Reproducibility of Results ,Rasch analysis ,Original Articles ,Middle Aged ,Models, Theoretical ,medicine.disease ,Interval Scale ,Disorders of movement Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience [Radboudumc 3] ,CLINICAL-TRIAL PREPAREDNESS ,Differential item functioning ,Muscular Dystrophy, Facioscapulohumeral ,MEASUREMENT MODEL ,Ceiling effect ,SCALES ,0305 other medical science ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Contains fulltext : 235675.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Patient-relevant outcome measures for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) are needed. The motor function measure (MFM) is an ordinal-based outcome measure for neuromuscular disorders, but its suitability to measure FSHD patients is questionable. Here, we performed Rasch analyses on MFM data from 194 FSHD patients to assess clinimetric properties in this patient group. Both the total scale and its three domains were analyzed (D1: standing position and transfers; D2: axial and proximal motor function; D3: distal motor function). Fit to the Rasch model, sample-item targeting, individual item fit, threshold ordering, sex- and age-based differential item functioning, response dependency and unidimensionality were assessed. Rasch analysis revealed multiple limitations of the MFM for FSHD, the most important being a large ceiling effect and suboptimal sample-item targeting, which were most pronounced for domains D2 and D3. There were disordered thresholds for most items, often resulting in items functioning in a dichotomous fashion. It was not possible to remodel the MFM into a Rasch-built interval scale. Remodeling of domain D1 into an interval scale with adequate fit statistics was achieved, but sample-item targeting remained suboptimal. Therefore, the MFM should be used with caution in FSHD patients, as it is not optimally suited to measure functional abilities in this patient group.
- Published
- 2021