Search

PURPOSE Genomes of tumors that are deficient in DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) have high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and harbor hundreds to thousands of somatic mutations that encode potential neoantigens. Such tumors are therefore likely to be immunogenic, triggering upregulation of immune checkpoint proteins. Pembrolizumab, an anti‒programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody, has antitumor activity against MSI-H/dMMR cancer. We report data from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study of pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated, advanced noncolorectal MSI-H/dMMR cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed MSI-H/dMMR advanced noncolorectal cancer who experienced failure with prior therapy received pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks for 2 years or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. Radiologic imaging was performed every 9 weeks for the first year of therapy and every 12 weeks thereafter. The primary end point was objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, as assessed by independent central radiologic review. RESULTS Among 233 enrolled patients, 27 tumor types were represented, with endometrial, gastric, cholangiocarcinoma, and pancreatic cancers being the most common. Median follow up was 13.4 months. Objective response rate was 34.3% (95% CI, 28.3% to 40.8%). Median progression-free survival was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.4 to 4.9 months) and median overall survival was 23.5 months (95% CI, 13.5 months to not reached). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 151 patients (64.8%). Thirty-four patients (14.6%) had grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse events. Grade 5 pneumonia occurred in one patient; there were no other treatment-related fatal adverse events. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates the clinical benefit of anti–programmed death-1 therapy with pembrolizumab among patients with previously treated unresectable or metastatic MSI-H/dMMR noncolorectal cancer. Toxicity was consistent with previous experience of pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Introduction/Background Describe the adjuvant management of high grade Uterine Sarcoma (US) and highlight prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and pelvic-free survival (PFS). Methodology Between 01/2000 and 01/2015, 91 patients undergoing surgery were presented at the Multidisciplinary Team Meeting of our institution. The type of surgery, the anatomopathological features, adjuvant treatments, dates and sites of recurrence were collected. The prognostic value of the various factors was evaluated with the multivariate Cox model. Results A total of 50 women were identified including 43 (86%) leiomyosarcomas and 7 (14%) high grade sarcoma. 18 (36%) patients received adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy (AR) and 6 (12%%) received adjuvant systemic therapy. The median follow-up time was 63 months. 39 (78%) patients had a recurrence: 22 (58%) only metastatic recurrence, 2 (5%) isolated pelvic recurrence and 15 (38%) pelvic and metastatic recurrence. AR (p=0.005, HR=0,15) was associated with survival without pelvic recurrence in univariate analysis; age >55 years (p=0.015, HR=2.37) and AR (p=0.013, HR=0.41) were associated with metastatic free survival in multivariate analysis. Conclusion According to the results of our series, there is a benefit of radiotherapy after surgery in terms of local control of US. It is necessary to identify the subgroup of patients who will benefit from an AR in order to provide them with more optimal care. Disclosure The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to describe the adjuvant management of high grade uterine sarcoma and highlight prognostic factors for overall survival and progression-free survival. Material and methods Between 01/2000 and 01/2015, 91 patients undergoing surgery were presented at the multidisciplinary team meeting of our institution. The type of surgery, the anatomopathological features, adjuvant treatments, dates and sites of recurrence were collected. The prognostic value of the various factors was evaluated with the multivariate Cox model. Results A total of 50 women with uterine sarcoma were identified and lesions included 43 leiomyosarcomas (86%) and seven high grade sarcomas (14%). Eighteen patients received adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy (36%) and six adjuvant systemic therapy (12%). The median follow-up time was 63 months. Thirty-nine patients (78%) had a recurrence: 22 had only metastatic recurrence (58%), two had isolated pelvic recurrence (5%) and 15 had pelvic and metastatic recurrence (38%). Adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with survival without pelvic recurrence in univariate analysis (P = 0.005, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.15); age greater than 55 years and adjuvant radiotherapy were associated with metastatic free survival in multivariate analysis (P = 0.015, HR = 2.37, and P = 0.013, HR = 0.41 respectively) Conclusion According to the results of our series, there is a benefit of radiotherapy after surgery in terms of local control of uterine sarcoma. It is necessary to identify the subgroup of patients who will benefit from an adjuvant radiotherapy in order to provide them with more optimal care.

Introduction Pembrolizumab has shown clinical benefit in patients with previously treated recurrent or metastatic SCLC in the phase 1b multicohort study KEYNOTE-028 ( NCT02054806 ) and the phase 2 multicohort study KEYNOTE-158 ( NCT02628067 ). We present a pooled analysis of patients from KEYNOTE-028 and KEYNOTE-158 who had received two or more lines of previous therapy for SCLC. Methods Eligible patients were aged 18 years and above, had histologically or cytologically confirmed incurable recurrent or metastatic SCLC, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 and below, and had received two or more lines of previous therapy. Patients in KEYNOTE-028 were required to have a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)–positive tumor. Patients received pembrolizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks in KEYNOTE-028 or 200 mg every 3 weeks in KEYNOTE-158) for up to 2 years. The primary end point was objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, which is presented here per independent review. Results Eighty-three patients who had received two or more lines of previous therapy (KEYNOTE-028, n = 19; KEYNOTE-158, n = 64) were included. Median follow-up duration was 7.7 (range, 0.5–48.7) months. Objective response rate was 19.3% (95% confidence interval: 11.4–29.4); two patients had complete response (one with a PD-L1–positive tumor), and 14 patients had partial response (13 with PD-L1–positive tumors). The median duration of response was not reached (range, 4.1‒35.8+ mo; plus sign indicates ongoing response); 61% of responders had responses lasting 18 months or longer. Fifty-one patients (61.4%) experienced any-grade treatment-related adverse events; eight patients (9.6%) had grade 3 or higher events. Conclusions Pembrolizumab exhibited durable antitumor activity in a subset of patients with recurrent or metastatic SCLC who had undergone two or more previous lines of therapy, regardless of PD-L1 expression. Pembrolizumab was well tolerated.

Purpose There are some lines of evidence suggesting a potential role of immunotherapy for treating patients with osteosarcomas. Patients and methods This was an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study of pembrolizumab in combination with metronomic cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced osteosarcomas. All patients received 50 mg b.i.d. of cyclophosphamide one week on and one week off and 200 mg of intravenous pembrolizumab (every 3 weeks). There was a dual primary end-point, encompassing both the non-progression and objective responses at 6 months per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST), version 1.1. An objective response rate of 20% and/or a 6-month non-progression rate of 60% were determined as reasonable objectives for treatment with meaningful effect. Correlative studies of immune biomarkers were planned from the patients' tumour samples. Results Between October 13 2015 and July 3 2017, 17 patients were included. Fifty were assessable for the efficacy end-point. Four patients experienced tumour shrinkage, resulting in a partial response (PR) in one patient (6.7%). The 6-month non-progression rate was 13.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7–40.5). The most frequent adverse events were grade I or II nausea, anaemia, anorexia and fatigue. programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression rate was low, observed in only 2 cases of 14 with available tumour material. The only patient who experienced PR had a PD-L1–negative tumour. Conclusion Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibition has limited activity in osteosarcomas. Further studies investigating PD-1 inhibitor in combination with agents modulating the microenvironment are warranted. Trial registration This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02406781 .

Summary Background Desmoid tumours are locally aggressive tumours associated with substantial morbidity. No systemic treatments are approved for this disease, with methotrexate–vinblastine the only chemotherapy regimen assessed in a clinical trial setting to date. VEGF overexpression is a common feature in aggressive desmoid tumours. Pazopanib is an oral antiangiogenic agent targeting VEGF receptors 1, 2, and 3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-like protein (PDGFR) α and β, and c-KIT tyrosine kinases. We aimed to assess antitumour activity and safety of targeted therapy or combination chemotherapy in progressive desmoid tumours. Methods DESMOPAZ was a non-comparative, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial conducted at 12 centres from the French Sarcoma Group. We enrolled adults (≥18 years) with progressive desmoid tumours, normal organ function and centrally documented progressive disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 based on two imaging assessments obtained within less than a 6-month interval. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to oral pazopanib 800 mg per day for up to 1 year or to an intravenous regimen combining vinblastine (5 mg/m2 per dose) and methotrexate (30 mg/m2 per dose), administered weekly for 6 months and then every other week for 6 months. Randomisation was stratified according to inclusion centre and tumour location. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had not progressed at 6 months in the first 43 patients who had received one complete or two incomplete cycles of pazopanib. This endpoint was also assessed as a prespecified exploratory endpoint in all patients who had received one complete or two incomplete cycles of methotrexate–vinblastane. Safety analyses were done for all patients who received at least one dose of allocated treatment. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01876082 . Findings From Dec 4, 2012, to Aug 18, 2017, 72 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (n=48 in the pazopanib group; n=24 in the methotrexate–vinblastine group). Median follow-up was 23·4 months (IQR 17·1–25·5). 46 patients in the pazopanib group and 20 patients in the methotrexate–vinblastine group were assessable for activity. In the first 43 patients assessable for the primary endpoint in the pazopanib group, the proportion of patients who had not progressed at 6 months was 83·7% (95% CI 69·3–93·2). The proportion of patients treated with methotrexate–vinblastine who had not progressed at 6 months was 45·0% (95% CI 23·1–68·5). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the pazopanib group were hypertension (n=10, 21%) and diarrhoea (n=7, 15%) and in the methotrexate–vinblastine group were neutropenia (n=10, 45%) and liver transaminitis (n=4, 18%). 11 patients (23%) had at least one serious adverse event related to study treatment in the pazopanib group, as did and six patients (27%) in the methotrexate–vinblastine group. Interpretation Pazopanib has clinical activity in patients with progressive desmoid tumours and could be a valid treatment option in this rare and disabling disease. Funding GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis.

International audience; BackgroundNETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 sarcoma reference centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTB) aiming to improve the outcome of sarcoma patients. Since 2010, presentation to an MDTB and expert pathological review are mandatory for sarcoma patients nationwide. In the present work, the impact of surgery in a reference center on the survival of sarcoma patients investigated using this national NETSARC registry.Patients and methodsPatients’ characteristics and follow-up are prospectively collected and data monitored. Descriptive, uni- and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors were conducted in the entire series (N = 35 784) and in the subgroup of incident patient population (N = 29 497).ResultsAmong the 35 784 patients, 155 different histological subtypes were reported. 4310 (11.6%) patients were metastatic at diagnosis. Previous cancer, previous radiotherapy, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), and Li–Fraumeni syndrome were reported in 12.5%, 3.6%, 0.7%, and 0.1% of patients respectively. Among the 29 497 incident patients, 25 851 (87.6%) patients had surgical removal of the sarcoma, including 9949 (33.7%) operated in a NETSARC center. Location, grade, age, size, depth, histotypes, gender, NF1, and surgery outside a NETSARC center all correlated to overall survival (OS), local relapse free survival (LRFS), and event-free survival (EFS) in the incident patient population. NF1 history was one of the strongest adverse prognostic factors for LRFS, EFS, and OS. Presentation to an MDTB was associated with an improved LRFS and EFS, but was an adverse prognostic factor for OS if surgery was not carried out in a reference center. In multivariate analysis, surgery in a NETSARC center was positively correlated with LRFS, EFS, and OS [P

We summarize here available data about systemic treatments of desmoids tumors, as well in adult patients as pediatric patients. Until 2018, the level of evidence associated with these treatments (NSAI, hormonal therapies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, chemotherapy) was very low, based on retrospective studies or non-randomized phase 2 trials with limited number of cases. In 2018-2019, 2 large randomized trials have been published, including one large superiority phase 3 trial comparing sorafenib to placebo. This trial clearly demonstrates the clinical benefit of sorafenib over placebo (level of evidence IA). To conclude, wait-and-see policy must be the first-line approach, systemic treatment is indicated in case of disease progression. Randomized trials are feasible in this exceptional disease.

The regulatory framework of clinical research is necessary to ensure the protection of participants and to define the actors and their responsibilities. Although main principles have been set up in 1947 with the Nuremberg Code, this regulatory framework is relatively recent in Europe: development of national regulations in the years 1980-1990, first European Directive regarding clinical trials in 2001. In France, as 2006 was marked by the implementation of this first "Clinical trials Directive", the end of the year 2016 and the following months were marked by the enforcement of the Jarde law (previously modified in order to reinforce the regulatory requirements following the death of an healthy volunteer in a clinical trial). As clinical researches involve processing of personal data, the entry into force, on 25 May 2018, of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) had also consequences on their implementation. Finally, regarding clinical trials on drugs, the "Clinical trials Regulation" repealing the Directive, voted in 2014, should come into force in the coming months.

Summary Background The clinical activity of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors seems restricted to cancers harbouring rare FGFR genetic aberrations. In preclinical studies, high tumour FGFR mRNA expression predicted response to rogaratinib, an oral pan-FGFR inhibitor. We aimed to assess the safety, maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase 2 dose, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary clinical activity of rogaratinib. Methods We did a phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study of rogaratinib in adults with advanced cancers at 22 sites in Germany, Switzerland, South Korea, Singapore, Spain, and France. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, and were ineligible for standard therapy, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, a life expectancy of at least 3 months, and at least one measurable or evaluable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. During dose escalation, rogaratinib was administered orally twice daily at 50–800 mg in continuous 21-day cycles using a model-based dose-response analysis (continuous reassessment method). In the dose-expansion phase, all patients provided an archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour biopsy or consented to a new biopsy at screening for the analysis of FGFR1–3 mRNA expression. In the dose-expansion phase, rogaratinib was given at the recommended dose for expansion to patients in four cohorts: urothelial carcinoma, head and neck squamous-cell cancer (HNSCC), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and other solid tumour types. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, determination of maximum tolerated dose including dose-limiting toxicities and determination of recommended phase 2 dose, and pharmacokinetics of rogaratinib. Safety analyses were reported in all patients who received at least one dose of rogaratinib. Patients who completed cycle 1 or discontinued during cycle 1 due to an adverse event or dose-limiting toxicity were included in the evaluation of recommended phase 2 dose. Efficacy analyses were reported for all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and who had available post-baseline efficacy data. This ongoing study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01976741, and is fully recruited. Findings Between Dec 30, 2013, and July 5, 2017, 866 patients were screened for FGFR mRNA expression, of whom 126 patients were treated (23 FGFR mRNA-unselected patients in the dose-escalation phase and 103 patients with FGFR mRNA-overexpressing tumours [52 patients with urothelial carcinoma, eight patients with HNSCC, 20 patients with NSCLC, and 23 patients with other tumour types] in the dose-expansion phase). No dose-limiting toxicities were reported and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached; 800 mg twice daily was established as the recommended phase 2 dose and was selected for the dose-expansion phase. The most common adverse events of any grade were hyperphosphataemia (in 77 [61%] of 126 patients), diarrhoea (in 65 [52%]), and decreased appetite (in 48 [38%]); and the most common grade 3–4 adverse events were fatigue (in 11 [9%] of 126 patients) and asymptomatic increased lipase (in 10 [8%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in five patients (decreased appetite and diarrhoea in one patient with urothelial carcinoma, and acute kidney injury [NSCLC], hypoglycaemia [other solid tumours], retinopathy [urothelial carcinoma], and vomiting [urothelial carcinoma] in one patient each); no treatment-related deaths occurred. Median follow-up after cessation of treatment was 32 days (IQR 25–36 days). In the expansion cohorts, 15 (15%; 95% CI 8·6–23·5) out of 100 evaluable patients achieved an objective response, with responses recorded in all four expansion cohorts (12 in the urothelial carcinoma cohort and one in each of the other three cohorts), and in ten (67%) of 15 FGFR mRNA-overexpressing tumours without apparent FGFR genetic aberration. Interpretation Rogaratinib was well tolerated and clinically active against several types of cancer. Selection by FGFR mRNA expression could be a useful additional biomarker to identify a broader patient population who could be eligible for FGFR inhibitor treatment. Funding Bayer AG.

The purpose of this study was to analyse the characteristics of 6 patients managed in a university hospital between 1996 and 2016 for non-islet cell tumor hypoglycemia (NICTH), a form of hypoglycaemia due to the paraneoplastic secretion of IGF-2 or its related substances. RESULTS: Three of these 6 patients (50%), aged over 69 years, including 2 with acromegaloid phenotype, presented with a pleural solitary fibrous tumor (SFT), with median diameter 20 cm (interquartile range, 12.5-20.5) with a low median SUV (3.3 g/mL (QR, 2-7.5)) on 18F-FDG PET. The other 3 patients presented respectively neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the palate (70-year-old woman), retroperitoneal myxofibrosarcoma (66-year-old man) and meningeal hemangiopericytoma (36-year-old woman). All 3 were inoperable and did not respond to any therapy other than glucose solution. Corticosteroid therapy was effective in the 3 SFTs and the NEC. One of the SFTs recurred 10 years later with asymptomatic hypoglycemia, which resolved after reintervention. Median (IQR) blood glucose levels of the 6 patients was 0.4g/L (QR, 0.31-0.41), with hypoinsulinemia at 0.7mIU/L (QR 0.7-2.0), undetectable GH, low IGF-1, normal IGF-2 level in 5/6 cases, a high IGF-2:IGF-1 ratio at 26.9 (QR, 20.8-37.8), hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia. CONCLUSION: NICTH is a rare syndrome, which should be considered in the presence of hypoinsulinemic hypoglycemia with low GH and IGF-1, and a IGF-2:IGF-1 ratio>10. Corticosteroid therapy was effective in elderly subjects, particularly with solitary fibrous tumor, which was generally operable. Hemangiopericytoma and myxofibrosarcoma had poor prognosis in younger patients.

The benefits of systematic re-excision (RE) after initial unplanned excision (UE) of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of delayed RE versus systematic RE after UE on overall survival (OS), metastatic relapse-free survival (MRFS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and rate of amputation. Patients who underwent complete UE, without metastasis or residual disease, for primary extremity or superficial STS between 2007 and 2013 were analyzed. The amputation rate, LRFS, MRFS, and OS were assessed in cases of systematic RE in sarcoma referral centers (Group A), systematic RE outside of community centers (Group B), or without RE (Group C). Groups A, B, and C included 300 (48.2%), 71 (11.4%), and 251 (40.4%) patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 61 months and 5-year OS was 88.4%, 87.3%, and 88% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively (p = 0.22), while 5-year MFRS was 85.4%, 86.2%, and 84.9%, respectively (p = 0.938); RE (p = 0.55) did not influence MRFS. The 5-year LRFS was 83%, 73.5%, and 63.8% in Groups A, B and C, respectively (p = 0.00001). Of the 123 local recurrences observed, 0/28, 1/15, and 5/80 patients in Groups A, B, and C, respectively, required amputation (p = 0.41). Factors influencing LRFS were adjuvant radiotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.21; p = 0.0001], initial R0 resection (HR 0.24, p = 0.0001), and Group A (HR 0.44; p = 0.01). Systematic RE in sarcoma centers offers best local control but does not impact OS. Delayed RE at the time of local relapse, if any, could be an option.

The editorial board of Bulletin du Cancer presents some hot topics published or presented in major oncology meetings in 2018. This selection is related to pediatric oncology and to solid and hemato-malignancies in adults, with immunotherapy approaches (checkpoints or CAR-T) as one of the major breakthroughs. Putative impacts on daily practices are discussed, in order to detail what will really change our practice.

International audience; BACKGROUND: Despite the completion of numerous phase II studies, a standard of care treatment has yet to be defined for metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). To determine benchmarks of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), we carried out a meta-analysis using individual patient level trial data.METHODS: Individual patient variables and survival outcomes were requested from 29 trials published from 2000 to 2016. Univariable and multivariable analysis were carried out for prognostic factors. The variability between trial arms and between therapeutic agents on PFS and OS was investigated.RESULTS: OS data were available for 912 patients. The median PFS was 3.3 months (95% CI 2.9-3.6) and 6-month PFS rate was 27% (95% CI 24-30). Univariable analysis showed male sex, elevated (i.e. > versus ≤ upper limit of normal) lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and diameter of the largest liver metastasis (≥3 cm versus

[Background] Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma is a rare sarcoma with low sensitivity to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Retrospective evidence suggests that antiangiogenic drugs could be a treatment option. We aimed to investigate the activity of pazopanib, an antiangiogenic drug, in patients with advanced extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma., [Methods] In this single-arm, open-label phase 2 trial, three parallel independent cohorts of different histotypes of advanced sarcomas were recruited (extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, typical solitary fibrous tumour, and malignant-dedifferentiated solitary fibrous tumour). In each cohort, patients received pazopanib. In this Article, we report the results of the cohort of patients with advanced extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma. Separate reporting of the three cohorts was prespecified in the study protocol. In this cohort, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with a diagnosis of NR4A3-translocated, metastatic, or unresectable extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, who had Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) progression in the previous 6 months, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, were enrolled at 11 study sites of the Spanish, Italian, and French sarcoma groups. Patients received oral pazopanib (800 mg/day) continuously, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, non-compliance, patient refusal, or investigator's decision. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an objective response according to RECIST 1·1 in the modified intention-to-treat population (patients who provided consent and had a central molecularly confirmed diagnosis of extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma). The safety analysis included all patients who received at least one dose of pazopanib. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02066285., [Findings] Between June 24, 2014, and Jan 17, 2017, 26 patients entered the study and started pazopanib. Of these, 23 met the eligibility criteria for the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Median follow-up was 27 months (IQR 18–30). 22 patients (one patient died before the primary analysis) were evaluable for the primary endpoint: four (18% [95% CI 1–36]) had a RECIST objective response. No deaths or grade 4 adverse events occurred. The most frequent grade 3 adverse events were hypertension (nine [35%] of 26 patients), increased concentration of alanine aminotransferase (six [23%]), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (five [19%])., [Interpretation] Pazopanib had clinically meaningful antitumour activity in patients with progressive and advanced extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, and could be considered a suitable option after failure to respond to first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy in these patients., Funding: Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas, Italian Sarcoma Group, French Sarcoma Group, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis.

Aim This study aimed at exploring several brain metastatic prognostic scores in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Patients and methods We retrospectively analyzed data of 93 metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who were diagnosed with brain metastases between October 2005 and July 2016 who received targeted therapy. Potential prognostic factors (RTOG RPA, BS-BM, and a newly developed score CERENAL) were analyzed. Results A total of 75 patients received targeted therapy. All scores showed prognostic value in progression-free survival after first-line treatment with CERENAL being the sole independent prognostic factor associated with improved duration of first-line treatment. Both RTOG RPA and CERENAL were potential prognosticators for overall survival, whereas only the CERENAL score was associated with prolonged disease-specific survival. Conclusion Several prognostic scores can be useful to predict survival of patients with brain metastases from renal cancer, especially the newly developed CERENAL score.

Recently, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) have emerged as new classes of anticancer therapies. Although generally considered less toxic than cytotoxic chemotherapy, these new drugs can cause significant unanticipated side effects including thyroid dysfunction. This review provides a literature assessment of thyroid dysfunctions induced by TKI and ICPIs. We intend to define for these two classes the frequency of thyroid involvement, the potential mechanisms that result in this toxicity, the clinical-biological impact and the therapeutic management. Detection of thyroid dysfunction requires monitoring of TSH, in combination with free T4 if needed and, depending on the clinical impact and the kinetics of biological abnormalities, starting symptomatic treatment of hyperthyroidism and/or correcting hypothyroidism.

2565 Background: Approval of pembrolizumab for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors that have progressed on prior therapy was supported by data from KEYNOTE-158 (NCT02628067). At the data cutoff of Dec 6, 2018, the ORR was 34.3% among 233 patients (pts) with MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors enrolled in all cohorts of KEYNOTE-158, 77.6% had duration of response (DOR) ≥24 mo, median PFS was 4.1 mo, and median OS was 23.5 mo. We present results from 351 pts enrolled in KEYNOTE-158 cohort K at the data cutoff of Oct 5, 2020. Methods: Cohort K of this phase 2, open-label study enrolled adults with any previously treated advanced noncolorectal MSI-H solid tumor, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, and ECOG PS of 0–1. MSI-H/dMMR status was assessed locally from a tumor tissue sample and defined as ≥1 of 4 MMR proteins absent by immunohistochemistry or as ≥2 allelic loci size shifts of 5 microsatellite markers by PCR. Pts received pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles or until PD, unacceptable toxicity, investigator decision, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints were DOR and PFS per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, OS, and safety. Efficacy was assessed in all pts who received ≥1 dose of treatment with ≥6 mo follow-up; safety was assessed in all treated pts. Results: 351 pts were enrolled in KEYNOTE-158 cohort K across multiple tumor types, including endometrial (22.5%), gastric (14.5%), small intestine (7.4%), ovarian (7.1%), cholangiocarcinoma (6.3%), and pancreatic (6.3%). 41.0% had 1 prior line of therapy; 55.6% had ≥2 prior lines. Median time from first dose to database cutoff (Oct 5, 2020) was 37.5 (range, 0.2–55.6) mo; 16.0% were continuing treatment. The ORR among the 321 eligble pts was 30.8% (CR, 27; PR, 72); median DOR was 47.5 mo (Table). Treatment-related AEs occurred in 64.7% of pts (grade 3–5, 12.0%), led to discontinuation in 6.6%, and led to death in 3 pts (myocarditis, pneumonia, and Guillain-Barre syndrome). Immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions occurred in 20.2% of pts (grade 3–4, 4.3%) and led to death in 2 pts with no other contributing factors (myocarditis [AE start, day 26; death, day 33] and Guillain-Barre syndrome [AE start, day 22; death, day 41]). Conclusions: Pembrolizumab demonstrated a high ORR (30.8%), durable clinical benefit, and a manageable safety profile in this heavily pretreated advanced MSI-H/dMMR noncolorectal pan-tumor population. Clinical trial information: NCT02628067. [Table: see text]

e13594 Background: During the French COVID-19 pandemic, clinical activity for cancer care has declined and modified the management of patients in cancer institute. France has imposed two national lockdowns of the population (from March 17 to May 11 and from October 30 to December 15 2020). We evaluate the impact of the lockdown period in North France on clinical activity. Methods: We measured and compared key-indicators of clinical activity between different periods: 2019 versus 2020; before and during the first and second lockdown. Results are given as percentage of changes with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: The comparative analysis between 2019 and 2020 showed that most clinical activities except hospitalizations (-0.0% [-0.2; +0.1%] has changed. There was a significant increase in overall treated patients (+0.4% [+0.3; +0.5], telemedicine +99.9% [+99.4; +99.7], MRI (+8.8% [+8.2; +9.5], ambulatory chemotherapy (+3.5% [+3.3; +3.8]), number of chemotherapies prepared (+2.0 [+.1.9; +2.2]) and admission in palliative care unit (+15.3%, [+10.8; +19.8]). On the contrary, a significant decrease in treated patients aged > 65 years old (-6.4% [-6.9; -5.9]), incidence rate (-3.1% [-3.6; -2.7]), multidisciplinary team meeting on patient assessment (-3.1% [-3.5;-2.5]), pathology reports (-2.9% (-3.3;-2.6]), radiotherapy (-4.6% [-4.7;-4.4]) and surgery (-6.7% [-7.4;-5.6]) were observed. In 2020, before and during the first lockdown all key-indicators declined except telemedicine (+40,400%) and admission in palliative care unit (+35.5% [+31.0-+49.7]). During the first lockdown, key-indicators decreased from -63.0% [-70.3-59.2] for outpatient visits to -5.1% [-7.0-3.8] for chemotherapy. The impact caused by the second lockdown was non-significant compared to the first one since all key-indicators has increased during the second lockdown: from +23.8% [+22.2; +25.5] for radiotherapy to +76.6% [+72.5; +79.5] for the management of new cases. Conclusions: Dramatic changes occurred in 2020 during the COVID-19-related lockdown compared to 2019. An Increase in chemotherapy treatment and admission on palliative care unit and a decrease in surgery and radiotherapy strongly suggests that the clinical activity was changed in 2020 compared to 2019. This was in line with the reduction of cancer screening in 2020. The impact of the first lockdown on clinical activities was higher compared to the second one. These observations should be investigated further in order to better understand the effects of a pandemic-related lockdown on cancer care.

5046 Background: Darolutamide (Daro) and enzamutamide (Enza) are both next generation androgen receptor inhibitors with demonstrated activity in men with CRPC. Although both agents are associated with survival improvement, their toxicity profiles are different. To help decipher whether this may impact on patient preference, we designed the ODENZA trial. Methods: ODENZA is a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, cross-over, phase II trial of preference between Daro and Enza in men with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic CRPC. Patients were randomized 1/1 to receive Daro 1200 mg/d for 12 weeks followed by Enza 160 mg/d for 12 weeks (Daro-Enza arm) or the reverse sequence (Enza-Daro arm). In both arms, the second treatment was given in absence of evidence of cancer progression at week 12. The primary endpoint was patient preference between the two drugs, as assessed by a questionnaire at week 24. The Prescott's test was used to determine treatment preference in patients fullfilling pre planned criteria (exposure to both treatments, no progression at week 12, and completion of the preference questionnaire). A p-value greater than 0.05 indicates that there is no difference in preference between treatments. Stratification factors were performance status and prior taxane for mCSPC. After week 24, patients went on to an extension period during which they received the chosen treatment until progression or toxicity. The main secondary objectives included reasons for preference, response at week 12, cognitive assessment, and toxicity. Results: Overall 249 pts were randomized, median age 72y (68; 79), ECOG PS 0 (56%), prior taxanes (22%). Two hundred pts fulfilled the pre-planned criteria for evaluation of the preference primary endpoint : 97 (48.5% [41.3;55.7]), 80 (40.0% [33.0;47.0]), and 23 (11.5% [6.8;16.2]) chose Daro, Enza, and had no preference, respectively (unilateral p-value of 0.92). After preference assessment, 186 patients entered the extension period: 103 (55.4%) and 83 (44.6%) received Daro and Enza respectively. The most common factors influencing patient preference all numerically favored Daro over Enza, without significant differences were: less fatigue (44% vs 29%), ease of taking the medication (37% vs 31%), better quality of life (36% vs 28%), ability to be more active (26% vs 15%), ability to concentrate (22% vs 15%) and less falls (6% vs 3%). A PSA50 response was achieved in 76.2% and 83.9% at week 12 with Daro and Enza respectively (p = 0.13). Fatigue was the most frequently reported all grade adverse event at week 12, in 21% and 36% with Daro and Enza, respectively. Conclusions: More patients with early mCRPC preferred Daro over Enza, although the difference did not reach significance, with fatigue as the key influencing factor. Clinical trial information: NCT03314324.

e24074 Background: Admission of cancer pts in ICU is a medical and ethical challenge, since there is no reliable prognostic tool for guiding decision making. Therefore, recent progress in cancer management improved the OS of advanced cancer pts, rendering this issue more and more frequent. Methods: We have retrospectively analyzed the medical charts of 129 consecutive pts treated in our institution and admitted in ICU from 01/2014 and 04/2019. We identified PF using Cox Models. We analyzed PF for OS or for ability to restart systemic treatment. Results: At the time of ICU admission, the mean age was 58.9 (range, 25-81). The were 51% of men. PS were 0-1 in 61% and 2-3 in 39%. The most prevalent cancers were lung (20%), sarcoma (17%), breast (16%) and gynecological cancers (11%). The number of metastatic sites was 1 (17%), 2 (39%), 3 (26%) and more (19%). The malignancy was stable in 69% and progressive in 31%. Pts currently received systemic treatment in 78%, were free of treatment in 5% and were not yet treated in 16%. Cancer itself (53%), toxicity of treatment (43%) and underlying comorbidities (37%) contributed to ICU admission. The number of organ failures was 0 in 12%, 1 in 40%, 2 in 26% and 3 or more in 22%. The 4 most symptoms were dyspnea (34%), severe infection (25%), cardiac event (23%) and bleeding (10%). Pt management required vasoamines administration (38%), ventilation (31%) and dialysis (4%). The median duration of stay in ICU was 4 days (range, 0-71). 21 (16%) pts died in ICU and 16 (12%) just after ICU discharge. 83 pts returned to home (64%). Systemic treatment was done in 61% of pts who left hospitalization alive after ICU. 1-month, 6-month and 12-month OS were 67, 36 and 21%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified the following PF for OS: PS = 0 (HR = 0.57 [0.38-0.79]; p = .007), admission related to underlying comorbidity (HR = 0.63 [0.41-0.98], p = .0001) or admission related to treatment toxicity (HR = 0.31 [0.17-0.56] p = .0001). Multivariate identified 1 PF for ability to restart systemic treatment: one or less organ failure (HR = 0.34 [0.14-0.83], p = 0.02). Conclusions: In ICU, OS of adult pts with solid tumors looks like the non-cancer population. ¼ of admitted pts died in ICU or just after. Key PF were PS and cause of critical state. When ICU admission is related to cancer itself, the prognosis was poor.

3096 Background: DPD deficiency screening before fluoropyrimidine is a matter of debate. To avoid lethal toxicity, French authorities impose DPD screening before fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy by dosing uracilemia since April 2019. Methods: We have included all consecutive adult patients receiving 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabin from April 2019 to January 2020 in 6 cancer centers. During the study period, different methods for screening had been applied: DPYD complete sequencing, phenotype (uracilemia and/or dihydrouracilemia/uracilemia ratio - UH2/U -) or both. All sceening tests were conducted in the same laboratory. Association between the method of DPD screening and fluoropyrimidine dose reduction at second chemotherapy cycle or on severe ≥grade 3 early toxicity (between first and second cycle) was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Concordance between genotype and phenotype for DPD deficiency was explored using Cohen Kappa test. Results: We included 597 patients, the median age was 63 (range, 55-77). The most prevalent cancers were digestive (68.3%), head and neck (19.4%) and breast (9.2%). 12.3% of patients received capecitabine and 87.3% received polychemotherapy. DPD deficiency screening was done for most of patients (n=519, 86.9%). DPD screening method consisted in full sequencing of DPYP (n=41; 7.9%), phenotype analysis (n=44, 8.5%) or both (n=424, 83.6%). We did not identify any complete DPD deficiency. Uracilemia was dosed for 467 patients, the median was 6.5 ng/mL and for 21 patients (4.5%) uracilemia was > 16 ng/mL and/or UH2/U

6020 Background: Bintrafusp alfa is a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of the TGF-βRII receptor (a TGF-β “trap”) fused to a human IgG1 mAb blocking PD-L1. A previous report of an expansion cohort from a phase 1 study (NCT02517398) suggested that bintrafusp alfa had a manageable safety profile and early signs of clinical activity in patients with heavily pretreated, advanced SCCHN after a median follow-up of 86.4 weeks. Here we report long-term efficacy and safety for this cohort. Methods: Patients with advanced SCCHN that progressed/recurred after platinum therapy in the recurrent/metastatic setting, or < 6 months after platinum therapy in the locally advanced setting, received bintrafusp alfa 1200 mg every 2 weeks until confirmed progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or trial withdrawal. The primary endpoint was confirmed best overall response assessed per RECIST 1.1 assessed by independent review committee (IRC); safety was a secondary endpoint. Results: As of May 15, 2020, 32 patients had received bintrafusp alfa for a median of 2.8 months (range, 0.5-29.9 months), no patient remained on treatment, and median follow-up to data cutoff was 41.7 months (range, 39.8-43.5 months). The objective response rate (ORR; 13%) was unchanged since the previous report; median duration of response (DOR) was increased at 21.4 months (95% CI, 5.5 months to not reached [NR]). While the clinical activity of bintrafusp alfa may be improved in patients with HPV-positive tumors (Table), outcomes were generally similar between PD-L1 subgroups (≥1% vs < 1% tumor cells). The overall safety profile was consistent with the previous report for this cohort, without grade 4 nor 5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); no new TRAEs of grade 3 or that led to discontinuation of bintrafusp alfa were reported. Conclusions: With a median follow-up of over 3 years in patients with heavily pretreated advanced SCCHN, bintrafusp alfa showed sustained clinical activity and 3-year OS of 24.0%, which compares favorably to historical data. Clinical activity appeared to be greater in patients with HPV-positive tumors than those with HPV-negative tumors. The safety profile was manageable and consistent with earlier analysis. Further investigation of bintrafusp alfa in SCCHN and other HPV-associated cancers is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02517398. [Table: see text]

11520 Background: AcSé Pembrolizumab is a Phase 2, non-randomized parallel arms, open-label, multicentric study from Unicancer investigating the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy in different cohorts of patients with rare cancers (NCT03012620). Here we report the results of pembrolizumab in the rare sarcoma cohort. Methods: Selected histotypes were all rare sarcomas patients (pts) (incidence < 0.2/100,000/year). Main inclusion criteria were age > 18, ECOG PS≤1 and advanced or metastatic disease resistant to standard treatment. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV as a 30-minute infusion on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle for a maximum of 2 years. The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate according to RECIST v1.1 at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Five groups of pts were distinguished, namely chordoma, alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS), desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT), smarca4 deficient malignant rhabdoid tumor (SMRT), and other histotypes. Results: 98 patients including 34 with chordoma, 14 ASPS, 11 SMRT, 8 DSCRT and 31 with other histotypes, were included from July 2017 to December 2020. The median number of cycles was 5 (range, 1 to 35) with 78 (79.6%) patients who discontinued the trial after a median of 4 cycles. There were 6 (7.3%) partial response (PR) at 12 weeks. The best response was CR in 1 patient (1%), PR in 14 patients (14.3%), and stable disease (SD) in 33 (33.7%). Median duration of response was 8.2 months [IQR, 4.1 to 9.0]. The occurrence of best response depended on the histotype, with 3 (8.8%) responses in chordoma, 7 (50%) in ASPS, 3 (27%) in SMRT, 1 (12.5%) in DSCRT and 1 (3.2%) in other histotypes (p = 0.0011). At the data cut off, median PFS was 2.75 months, and median OS was 19.7 months on the overall population. Outcomes differed according to the histotype group, with the 12 months PFS rates at 31.2% (chordoma), 35.7% (ASPS), 18.2% (SMRT), 0% (DSCRT) and 3.3% (other), respectively (p < 0.0001), and median PFS at 6.6 (chordoma), 7.5 (ASPS), 1.1 (SMRT), 2.1 (DSCRT) and 2.1 months (other), while 1-year OS rates were 76.6% (chordoma), 85.7% (ASPS), 36.4% (SMRT), 17.5% (DSCRT) and 42.9% (other) with median OS only reached for SMRT (2.4 months), DSRCT (10 months), and the other histotype group (7.1 months) (p = 0.004). The side effect profile of pembrolizumab was similar to other tumor type. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab is safe and well tolerate in this pop od STS pts, AcSé study reports high levels response rate and prolonged activity in selected subtypes of rare sarcomas. Clinical trial information: NCT03012620.

TPS11576 Background: Pts with OS and non-OS of bone are treated with a multimodal sequence therapy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT), surgery and adjuvant CT, followed by a close surveillance until recurrence. At recurrence, the prognosis remains poor with objective response rates of 3-29%, and a median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of less than 4 months in OS. There is a clinical need to reduce the risk of recurrence after the initial treatment sequence. The REGOBONE study reported a significant clinical benefit of regorafenib compared to placebo in patients with relapsed OS (median PFS: 16.4 versus 4.1 weeks). Methods: This multicenter trial is ongoing to study the efficacy and safety of maintenance REGO in pts > = 16 years, with complete remission after initial treatment sequence of their bone sarcoma. 168 pts will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either oral REGO or its matching placebo (control arm) at a daily dose of 120mg, continuously and for a maximum of 12 months. Randomization will be stratified according to the following risk factors: metastases (mets) at diagnosis and/or poor response to neoadjuvant CT versus no mets at diagnosis and good response to neoadjuvant CT. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy (Relapse-Free Survival) between the 2 arms. The expected 3-year RFS rates are 55% in the control arm and 74.6% in the REGO arm (HR = 0.5). 66 events will provide 80% power to show significant improvement in RFS, using a 2-sided log-rank test at a 5% level. Secondary endpoints include Time to Treatment Failure, Overall Survival, Quality of Life, safety profile, and compliance to treatment. Radiological endpoints will be evaluated using the RECIST 1.1. Translational objectives will be to identify predictive biomarkers for efficacy of REGO as maintenance therapy using liquid biopsies. As of Feb 1st, 2021, 3 patients have been randomized. 15 sites of the French Sarcoma Group will participate. Clinical trial information: NCT04055220.

11510 Background: DF rare locally aggressive fibroblastic non-metastasizing tumor, with an unpredictable course. Its management remains challenging, there is a current shift in standard of care from large surgical resection (SR) to active surveillance (AS). Most of DF display somatic mutation of CTNNB1, with three major hotpots: S45F, T41A and S45P. The poor prognosis of S45F is a matter of debate (Timbergen et al. Ann Surg 2019). Methods: ALTITUDES (NCT02867033) is a nationwide prospective registry of DF, diagnosed from January 2016 to December 2020 and confirmed by central pathological review. CTNNB1 mutations were identified by NGS. Primary endpoint was event-free survival (including disease progression or relapse). We have selected pts managed by AS, SR or systemic treatments as front-line. Pt undergoing R2 resection and then managed by follow-up were part of AS group. Prognostic factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox Model. Results: From the 630-pts enrolled in ALTITUDES, 500 (79.3%) were eligible for the present analysis. Exclusion criteria were diagnosis before 2016 in 13 pts, multiple DF in 33 pts, 39 pts without CTNNB1 mutation analysis, and 45 pts receiving other treatments. The study population included 349 females (69.8%), the median age was 40 years (range 1-89). Abdominal wall was the predominant primary site: 161 pts (32.2%). In 430 (86.0%) cases, there was a CTNNB1 mutation, including, S45F in 56 cases (11.2%). In 70 cases (14.0%), we did not identify CTNNB1 mutation. The front-line managements were AS in 361 pts (72.2%), SR with R0/R1 margins in 57 cases (11.4%) and systemic treatments in 82 pts (16.5%). The median follow-up was 23 months (Range, 0.4-55). Overall, progression or relapse occurred in 128 pts (25.6%). We observed a significant EFS-difference between treatment groups, both in univariate and multivariate analysis with, compared to AS, a better outcome in patients with SR and worse outcome in patients who had received a systemic treatment (p = 0.01 in multivariate analysis). The risk of event was significantly associated with the tumor size, with a HR = 1.46 in tumors larger than 50 mm compared to smaller tumors (95%CI, 1.01-2.10, p = 0.04). We did not observe any significant association between the CTNNB1 mutational status and the outcome: compared to patients with another mutation, the hazard ratio associated with a S45F mutation was HR = 0.84 (95%CI, 0.48-1.46, p = 0.53) in multivariate analysis. Age, gender, location (abdominal wall versus other) were not associated with EFS. Conclusions: In this large prospective study, S45F was not an independent poor prognostic factor in DF. Size and front-line treatment drive both the outcome. The understanding and prediction of natural course of DF require further studies.

e13604 Background: To limit SARS-Co-2 transmission in general population, French government had set up a first National containment from March 16, 2020 to June 2, 2020. Furthermore, General Direction of our hospital have implemented and organized physical distancing (telework, teleconsultation, virtual multi-disciplinary board), mask wearing, use of alcoholic ... to limit interpersonal contacts. To assess the impact of this policy, we have carried out a seroprevalence study and identified risk factors for SARS-Co-2 prevalence among HCP in May/June 2020. Methods: This is part of CORSER Study (“Etude séro-épidémiologique du virus SARS-CoV-2 en France d’une Cohorte CORSER-2d de personnels d’établissements de santé »), registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04325646). Two serological tests were applied in this cohort: S-Flow assay and Luciferase-linked immune-sorbent assay (LuLisa-N test). Results: Between 04 May to 26 June 2020, 392 Osar Lambret Cancer Center employees were included in the present study (about 40% of all staff). The most common jobs were: 92 nurses (23.4%), 80 radiology/radiotherapy manipulators (20.4%), 51 physicians (13.0%), 33 medical interns (8.4%) and 47 administrative staff members (11.9%). There were 98 men (25.0%) and 294 women (75.0%). The mean age was 38.7 (+/- 11.4). There were 7 seropositive cases; the seroprevalence was 1.8% (95%-CI: 0.7-3.6). Among the 7 positive cases, 5 were symptomatic (71.4%). In univariate analysis, factors associated with SARS-Co-2 seroprevalence: symptoms suggesting viral infection within 2 months (OR=5.33), dysgueusia (OR=37.00), anosmia (OR=66.29) and HCP exposed to COVID-19 patient outside work (OR=6.69). Gender, tobacco consumption, O blood group, HCP versus administrative staff, HCP working in different services, HCP providing care to suspected COVID-19 patients, HCP providing high-risk cares were not found to be associated with seropositivity. Of note, we have noticed that BMI≥ 24 kg/m² was associated with seroprevalence (OR=15.45), without biological rational. Conclusions: Our study suggests that strict implementation of protective measures was associated with low SARS-Cov-2 prevalence at the end of first National Containment, including among HCP treating COVID-19+ patients. HCPs seroprevalence seemed lower than seroprevalence of the general population at the same period (4-5%). Clinical trial information: NCT04325646.

e24026 Background: Despite largely diffused guidelines, Pneumococcal and Influenza vaccination coverage (VC) remains insufficient in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. We evaluated VC and carried out an interventional study to improve VC in cancer patients treated in 3 medical oncology departments in 3 hospitals of North-of-France. Methods: Using a standardized questionnaire, we assessed the VC in adult cancer patients receiving anticancer treatment in day hospital between 02 and 07 Dec. 2019. Then, in each hospital, we organized trainings with physicians to discuss the current vaccination guidelines (January 2020). Finally, to assess the impact of this intervention on Pneumococcal and Influenza VC, we have conducted a similar survey using the same questionnaire in March 2020. Since there were no specific guidelines on Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis (DTP) VC and we did not expect an improvement, we have monitored DTP VC as internal control. Results: 272 patients have been enrolled in the “before study” in the 3 hospitals, whereas 156 patients have been enrolled in the “after study” in only 2 hospitals (the after-study was not feasible in 3rd hospital because of COVID-19 pandemic national containment). Predictors associated with DTP VC was age, with Pneumococcal VC was center and with Influenza VC were age, gender and tumor histology (adenocarcinoma vs others). Influenza VC was significantly improved after intervention (42.6 vs 55.1% with p = 0.016) especially in fragile patients, but Pneumococcal VC was not (11.8 vs 15.4% with p = 0.357). Conclusions: As expected, VC was very low in cancer patients, our figures are consistent with literature data. The impact of intervention (training of physicians) is limited without improvement of Pneumococcal VC. We presume that this increase in Influenza VC mainly reflects the overall result of national Influenza vaccination campaign.

4080 Background: Second-line treatment options for patients with biliary tract cancers (BTC) are limited. Lenvatinib, an anti-angiogenic multikinase inhibitor, in combination with the programmed death-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab, has demonstrated promising antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in patients with select advanced solid tumors. LEAP-005 (NCT03797326) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors; here we present results from the BTC cohort of LEAP-005. Methods: In this nonrandomized, open-label, phase 2 study, eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically documented advanced (metastatic and/or unresectable) BTC with disease progression after 1 prior line of therapy, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS of 0‒1, and tissue sample evaluable for PD-L1 expression. Patients received lenvatinib 20 mg once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles (approximately 2 years) or until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Treatment with lenvatinib could continue beyond 2 years in patients experiencing clinical benefit. Primary endpoints were ORR (per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review) and safety. Secondary endpoints were the disease control rate (DCR; comprising CR, PR, and SD), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. Tumor imaging was performed Q9W from treatment initiation for 54 weeks, then Q12W to week 102, and Q24W thereafter. Results: 31 patients were enrolled in the BTC cohort (ECOG PS 1, 55%; 84% ex-US). As of April 10, 2020, median time from first dose to data cutoff (DCO) was 9.5 months (range, 3.1‒11.9), with 8 patients on treatment at DCO. There were 3 (10%) PRs and 18 (58%) SDs. ORR was 10% (95% CI, 2‒26), and DCR was 68% (95% CI, 49‒83). Median DOR was 5.3 months (range, 2.1+ to 6.2). Median PFS was 6.1 months (95% CI, 2.1‒6.4). Median OS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 5.6 to NR). Treatment-related AEs occurred in 30 patients (97%), including 15 (48%) who had grade 3 AEs; there were no grade 4 or 5 treatment-related AEs. 2 (6%) discontinued treatment due to treatment-related AEs (myocarditis, pyrexia; n = 1 each). The most frequent treatment-related AEs were hypertension (42%), dysphonia (39%), diarrhea (32%), fatigue (32%), and nausea (32%). 14 patients (45%) had immune-mediated AEs and 1 patient (3%) had an infusion-related reaction. Conclusions: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated encouraging efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with advanced BTC who had received 1 line of prior therapy. Based on these data, enrollment in the BTC cohort has been expanded to 100 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03797326.

11507 Background: PD1 inhibition has shown limited activity in all comers clinical trials including patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). In the PEMBROSARC study, objective response rate, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were respectively 2.1%, 1.4 and 7.1 months respectively (Toulmonde et al. Jama Oncol 2017). We have recently shown that the presence of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) may represent a biomarker to select patients who are more likely to benefit from immunotherapy (PetitPrez et al., Nature 2020). We report here the first clinical trial investigating the efficacy of PD1 inhibition in TLS-positive STS. Methods: PEMBROSARC is an open-label multicenter phase II study of pembrolizumab in combination with low-dose cyclophosphamide in pts with STS selected based on the presence of TLS. TLS status has been assessed centrally has previously described (PetitPrez et al., Nature 2020). Eligible patients received pembrolizumab 200mg IV q21 days and cyclophosphamide 50 mg BID 1week on, 1 week off. All patients had confirmed progressive disease at inclusion based on central review of two imaging performed at less than 6 months interval. The primary efficacy endpoint was 6-month non-progression (as per RECIST evaluation criteria v1.1). Based on the following hypotheses: 15% 6-month non-progression rate (H0), 40% acceptable 6-month non-progression rate (H1), 5% type I error rate, 90% power, a total of 29 assessable patients were necessary and 8 patients or more had to be progression-free at 6 months to reach the first endpoint. Results: 240 patients were screened for TLS status between September 2018 and January 2020 in 7 centers of the French Sarcoma Group. Among them, 48 were found to be TLS+ as per central review and 35 were included in the study. The three most frequent histological subtypes were: well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (n = 13); UPS (n = 6), and leiomyosarcoma (n = 4). 30 patients were eligible for efficacy. Of those, as per central imaging review, 13 patients (43.3%) had tumor shrinkage resulting in partial response in 8 patients (26.7%) and stable disease in 5 cases (16.7%). 10 patients had progressive disease. Twelve patients were progression-free at 6 months (40.0% 95%CI = [22.7 – 59.4]).Median PFS and OS were 4.1 months (95%CI, 1.4-9.6) and 14.5 months (95%CI, 8.5- 18.3 months), respectively. Conclusions: With an objective response and a 6-month non-progression rates of 26.7% and 40% respectively versus 2.1% and 4.2% in all comers, the PEMBROSARC study confirms that selection based on TLS status is an efficient approach to tailor immunotherapy in STS patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02406781.

126 Background: The Phase 3 PROfound trial (NCT02987543) met its primary endpoint and key secondary endpoints, including improved overall survival (OS) for olaparib in men with mCRPC with alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM (Cohort A). We report gene-by-gene analysis of olaparib antitumor activity among the 15 prespecified homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Methods: Pts were randomized to olaparib (300 mg bid; n=256) or physician’s choice of enzalutamide or abiraterone (control; n=131). Exploratory analyses in pts with alterations in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCA, regardless of co-occurring alterations with other HRR genes) or in single genes were conducted. Results: Evidence of olaparib antitumor activity was observed in subgroups with >10 pts (table). Data for pts with alterations in only BRCA1, BRCA2, PPP2R2A, RAD51B, RAD54L, PALB2, BRIP1, CHEK1, BARD1, and RAD51D will be reported (no FANCL or RAD51C enrolled). Conclusions: Small subgroups limit interpretation for some genes. Olaparib antitumor activity is greatest in pts with BRCA alterations, with a spectrum of clinical sensitivity to olaparib as defined by rPFS and OS across the broader population with alterations in other HRR genes. Clinical trial information: NCT02987543. [Table: see text]

321 Background: Second-line treatment options for patients with biliary tract cancers (BTC) are limited. Lenvatinib, an anti-angiogenic multikinase inhibitor, in combination with the programmed death-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab, has demonstrated promising antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in patients with select advanced solid tumors. LEAP-005 (NCT03797326) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors; here we present results from the BTC cohort of LEAP-005. Methods: In this nonrandomized, open-label, phase II study, eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically documented advanced (metastatic and/or unresectable) BTC with disease progression after 1 prior line of therapy, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS of 0‒1, and tissue sample evaluable for PD-L1 expression. Patients received lenvatinib 20 mg once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles (approximately 2 years) or until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Treatment with lenvatinib could continue beyond 2 years in patients experiencing clinical benefit. Primary endpoints were ORR (per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review) and safety. Secondary endpoints were the disease control rate (DCR; comprising CR, PR, and SD), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. Tumor imaging was performed Q9W from treatment initiation for 54 weeks, then Q12W to week 102, and Q24W thereafter. Results: 31 patients were enrolled in the BTC cohort (ECOG PS 1, 55%; 84% ex-US). As of April 10, 2020, median time from first dose to data cutoff (DCO) was 9.5 months (range, 3.1‒11.9), with 16 patients on treatment at DCO. There were 3 (10%) PRs and 18 (58%) SDs. ORR was 10% (95% CI, 2‒26), and DCR was 68% (95% CI, 49‒83). Median DOR was 5.3 months (range, 2.1+ to 6.2). Median PFS was 6.1 months (95% CI, 2.1‒6.4). Median OS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 5.6 to NR). Treatment-related AEs occurred in 30 patients (97%), including 15 (48%) who had grade 3‒4 AEs; there were no treatment-related deaths. 2 (6%) discontinued treatment due to treatment-related AEs (myocarditis, pyrexia; n = 1 each). The most frequent treatment-related AEs were hypertension (42%), dysphonia (39%), diarrhea (32%), fatigue (32%), and nausea (32%). 14 patients (45%) had immune-mediated AEs and 1 patient (3%) had an infusion-related reaction. Conclusions: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated encouraging efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with advanced BTC who had received 1 line of prior therapy. Based on these data, enrollment in the BTC cohort has been expanded to 100 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03797326.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW The use of antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is challenging and often requires dose adaptation and transient or definitive treatment interruption. We believe that the inappropriate recommended dose of TKI is related to no optimal study designs in the early development of the drug. RECENT FINDINGS As an example of this, we described herein some pitfalls made in the successive development of sunitinib, sorafenib, regorafenib, and pazopanib, but there are several other examples of early drugs development illustrating this issue. SUMMARY Regarding the antiangiogenic TKI mechanism of action, we strongly feel that innovative approaches are needed such as extended dose-limiting toxicity period or a better definition of the induced toxicity. Furthermore, before classic phase II/III trials, an intermediate step may be needed to better define the recommended phase II dose, such as a randomized phase I/II trial with several expansion cohorts.

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the time interval (TI) between surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Methods and materials Data from 1131 patients treated between 1990 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: limb or superficial trunk wall STS (R0 or R1 resection) and adjuvant RT. The impact of TI on 10-year local relapse-free survival (LRFS) and 10-year overall survival (OS) was analyzed using a Log-rank test and then Cox Model. Results The median TI was 82days (range, 18–346). With a median follow-up of 235months (range, 2–296months), the 10-year LRFS was 57.5% (±2%) and the 10-year OS was 64.2% (±2%). With a TI of 19–39days, 40–79days, 80–119days, and ⩾120days, 10-year LRFSs were 65.3%, 55.5%, 56.9% and 61.2% ( p =0.465), and 10-year OSs were 72.8%, 60.7%, 66.4% and 62.1% ( p =0.347), respectively. After adjustment for the factors significantly ( p ⩽0.05) associated with LRFS and OS, TI did not alter LRFS ( p =0.182) either OS ( p =0.335). Conclusions In this retrospective STS database study, the TI between surgery and start of adjuvant RT did not seem to affect outcomes.

Background There is substantial evidence that classically used toxicity-driven dose-escalating phase I trials are not optimal for defining the recommended phase II dose for molecular-targeted therapies.

Gemcitabine is largely used in the management of sarcomas. We have systematically reviewed all of the fully published trials that investigated a gemcitabine-based regimen in the management of sarcomas and then provided a grade of recommendations and a level of evidence for every recommendation. Because of conflicting results from successive non-randomized phase II trials, gemcitabine activity alone in unselected pretreated soft tissue sarcomas could not be properly assessed. Gemcitabine alone and gemcitabine-docetaxel appeared to both be active in pretreated uterine and non-uterine leiomyosarcoma (1B;I). Gemcitabine-dacarbazine appeared to be active in pretreated unselected soft tissue sarcomas (1B;I). According the GeDDIS phase III trial (not yet fully published), gemcitabine-docetaxel appeared slightly less active than doxorubicine and more toxic than doxorubicine in chemo-naïve metastatic soft tissue sarcoma patients. Because of the absence of controlled randomized trials, the benefit of gemcitabine-docetaxel as an adjuvant treatment in high-grade uterine leiomyosarcoma could not be appropriately assessed. The level of activity of gemcitabine/docetaxel in bone sarcomas cannot be ascertained with the available data. The level of evidence supporting the use of gemcitabine-based regimens in sarcoma management is limited. Confirmatory phase III trials are warranted when phase II trials suggest some preliminary activity.

Resume Les congres de 2015 en oncologie ont ete repartis a travers tous les continents. Une selection par le comite editorial du Bulletin du cancer a ete realisee parmi les meilleurs resumes, presentations et articles publies dans les differents domaines de specificite de l’oncologie. Ces focus permettent une vision synthetique des avancees majeures de l’annee.

Objective: This study aimed to identify predictors of tumor control (TC) in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving first-line chemotherapy. Methods: A development cohort of 68 patients from a prospective multicenter trial (NCT01248299) was used to identify predictors of TC at first radiological tumor assessment and to generate a predictive score for TC. That score was applied in an independent retrospective single-center validation cohort of 60 consecutive patients. Results: Multivariate analysis identified three predictors of TC: body mass index ≥18.5 (OR 4.5, 95% CI 0.91-22.5), absence of bone metastasis (OR 4.6, 95% CI 0.91-23.2) and albumin ≥35 g/l (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.0-12.1). Based on the presence or absence of these three independent prognosticators, we built a predictive model using a score from 0 to 3. In the development cohort, the TC rates were 14.3 and 78.0% and in the validation cohort 12.5 and 44.2%, for scores of 0-1 and 2-3, respectively. With negative predictive values of 85 and 88% in the development and validation cohorts, respectively, we were able to identify patients with a very low probability of TC. Conclusion: We have developed and validated a score that can be easily determined at the bedside to predict TC in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Objective Studies regarding natural caregivers' burden (CB) in palliative situations, as well as its determinants and consequences, have been numerous during the last 20 years. Yet, studies regarding how terminally ill cancer patients perceive their CB (self-perceived burden, SPB) are less common. This study aims to assess the links between CB and SPB evaluated by means of the very same items. It also aims at identifying the determinants of potential differences between CB and SPB and their consequences on emotional distress among both members of the dyad. Methods Sixty cancer patients from a palliative care unit and their principal natural caregiver completed questionnaires concerning the subjective burden of the caregiver, their own personal emotional distress and that of the other member of the dyad. Results Globally, patients had a good perception of their CB, although a little overestimated, except for their difficulties in managing their time. Caregivers overestimated patients' distress. The minimisation by patients of CB was a source of emotional distress for the latter, and the perception of being a burden to others was a source of depression for patients. These results did not depend on the nature of the relationship between patients and their caregivers. Conclusions This data confirmed the need to study the experiences of the patient–caregiver dyad as well as their communication of their respective experiences, with a prospect to offer clinical interventions to optimise the quality of life and health of patients and their close relatives. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

IntroductionUp to 50% of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients develop metastases in the course of their disease. Cytotoxic therapy is a standard treatment in this setting but yields average tumour response rates of 25% at first line and ≤10% at later lines. In oligometastatic stage, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allows reaching high control rates at treated sites (≥80%) and is potentially equally effective to surgery in term of overall survival. In order to shift the balance towards antitumour immunity by multisite irradiation, radiation could be combined with inhibitors of the immunosuppressive pathways.Methods and analysisSTEREOSARC is a prospective, multicentric, randomised phase II, designed to evaluate the efficacy of SBRT associated with immunotherapy versus SBRT only. Randomisation is performed with a 2:1 ratio within two arms. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy, in term of progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months, of immunomodulated stereotactic multisite irradiation in oligometastatic sarcoma patients. The secondary objectives include PFS by immune response criteria, overall survival, quality-of-life evaluation and developing mathematical models of tumour growth and dissemination predictive of oligometastatic versus polymetastatic evolution. Patients will be randomised in two groups: SBRT with atezolizumab and SBRT alone. The total number of included patients should be 103.Trial registrationThe trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03548428).Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by Comité de Protection des Personnes du sud-ouest et outre-mer 4 on 18 October 2019 (Reference CPP2019-09-076-PP) and from National Agency for Medical and Health products Safety (Reference: MEDAECNAT-2019-08-00004_2017-004239-35) on 18 September 2019.The results will be disseminated to patients upon individual request or through media release from scientific meetings. The results will be communicated through scientific meetings and publications.