Search

INTRODUCTION: The optimal definitive radiotherapy (RT) scheme in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) remains controversial, especially in elderly patients. METHODS: Data of elderly patients with cSCC lesion(s) treated with weekly hypofractionated RT (8 Gy per week per 7-8 weeks) were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (median age 89 years) with 23 cSCC lesions have been identified including nine males (50%) and nine females (50%). The most common tumor localization was the head and neck region (n = 21; 91.3%), and the majority of lesions (n = 15; 65.2%) was stage ≥ III. At diagnosis, pain and bleeding were ascribed in 13 (56.5%) and eight (34.8%) cSCC, respectively. Compliance with weekly hypofractionated RT was excellent. The overall response rate at 12 weeks after treatment was 95.7%. Bleeding and pain relief were achieved in all cases. Severe toxicity was not recorded. The 1-year overall survival was 66.0%. The 1-year progression-free survival was 58.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly hypofractionated RT provides a safe, efficient, and cost-effective treatment in elderly cSCC patients with minimal side effects.

INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of post-mastectomy hypofractionationed radiation therapy (HFRT) for breast cancer in Victoria, Australia. METHODS This is a population-based cohort of women with breast cancer who received post-mastectomy RT to the chest wall with or without nodal irradiation between 2012 and 2017. HFRT was defined as

Background: Radiotherapy represents one of the main therapeutic modalities for localized prostate cancer. In the last two decades, emerging data regarding the radiobiology of prostate cancer suggests a very low α/β value, Objective: The aim of this manuscript is to present the rationale of prostate radiobiology and the medical evidence of moderate hypofractionation for prostate cancer. Methods: Existing literature was reviewed, including data from prospective clinical trials dealing with the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy. Fifteen prospective phase II studies, nine randomized phase III studies and ten meta-analyses were selected. For every study included, the equivalent dose was calculated for both biochemical control and late toxicity. Results: The efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy, compared to conventional radiotherapy, regarding biochemical control, was evaluated in five superiority and four non-inferiority randomized phase III studies. The majority of participants in these studies were patients with low- and intermediate- risk prostate cancer. Even though the superiority criterion of the hypofractionation was not met in all studies, the noninferiority criterion was met. Prospective phase II studies of hypofractionation reported a low rate of acute and late toxicity. In randomized phase III studies, acute and late toxicity grade 3 and higher for the bowel and bladder was comparable between hypofractionated and conventional radiotherapy. The included meta-analyses showed no difference in efficacy and toxicity. Conclusion: Moderate hypofractionation is feasible and safe, and may be considered as an alternative option in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.

Background While several phase III trials have investigated the role of hypofractionated radiotherapy in the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer, prospective data reporting the outcomes of hypofractionated radiotherapy in the postoperative treatment setting are sparse. Therefore, this study is designed to assess the efficacy and treatment-related toxicity of hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of biochemical recurrence in men who underwent radical prostatectomy. The primary objective of this trial is to investigate whether hypofractionated radiotherapy improves biochemical control compared with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. In addition, treatment-related toxicity, quality of life, and survival will be evaluated as secondary endpoints. Methods In this prospective, randomized, multi-institutional trial (the SHARE study), patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer will be randomized to receive either hypofractionated radiotherapy (65 Gy in 2.5-Gy fractions) or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (66 Gy in 2-Gy fractions). Prostate bed irradiation or elective pelvic nodal irradiation including the prostate bed will be performed using intensity-modulated radiotherapy and daily image guidance. Treatment efficacy will be assessed using the serum tumor marker prostate-specific antigen, and toxicity will be evaluated through both physician- and patient-reported outcomes. Quality of life will also be investigated. Discussion This study is designed to demonstrate whether hypofractionated radiotherapy is beneficial in terms of biochemical control and toxicity compared with standard salvage radiotherapy. If hypofractionated radiotherapy is shown to be superior to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, it will mean that improved biochemical control can be achieved, accompanied by greater patient convenience and more efficient use of medical resources. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03920033. Registered on 18 April 2019

PURPOSE: There are limited prospective data on predictors of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after whole-breast irradiation (WBI) plus a boost. We sought to characterize longitudinal PROs and cosmesis in a randomized trial comparing conventionally fractionated (CF) versus hypofractionated (HF) WBI. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2011 to 2014, women aged ≥40 years with Tis-T2 N0-N1a M0 breast cancer who underwent a lumpectomy with negative margins were randomized to CF-WBI (50 Gray [Gy]/25 fractions plus boost) versus HF-WBI (42.56 Gy/16 fractions plus boost). At baseline (pre-radiation), at 6 months, and yearly thereafter through 5 years, PROs included the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy−Breast (FACTB), and Body Image Scale; cosmesis was reported by the treating physician using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group cosmesis values. Multivariable mixed-effects growth curve models evaluated associations of the treatment arm and patient factors with outcomes and tested for relevant interactions with the treatment arm. RESULTS: A total of 287 patients were randomized, completing a total of 14,801 PRO assessments. The median age was 60 years, 37% of patients had a bra cup size ≥D, 44% were obese, and 30% received chemotherapy. Through 5 years, there were no significant differences in PROs or cosmesis by treatment arm. A bra cup size ≥D was associated with worse BCTOS cosmesis (P < .001), BCTOS pain (P = .001), FACT-B Trial Outcome Index (P = .03), FACT-B Emotional Well-being (P = .03), and Body Image Scale (P = .003) scores. Physician-rated cosmesis was worse in patients who were overweight (P = .02) or obese (P < .001). No patient subsets experienced better PROs or cosmesis with CF-WBI. CONCLUSIONS: Both CF-WBI and HF-WBI confer similar longitudinal PROs and physician-rated cosmesis through 5 years of follow-up, with no relevant subsets that fared better with CF-WBI. This evidence supports broad adoption of hypofractionation with boost, including in patients receiving chemotherapy and in a population with a high prevalence of obesity. The associations of large breast size and obesity with adverse outcomes across multiple domains highlight the opportunity to engage at-risk patients in lifestyle intervention strategies, as well as to consider alternative radiation treatment regimens.

Approximately thirty percent of patients experience biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Early salvage radiotherapy has recently become a standard of care in this setting. The purpose of this review is first to summarize current knowledge in terms of dose to the prostate bed in light of the recent SAKK 09/10 randomized phase III trial results. The evidence on moderate hypofractionation will also be discussed whereas extreme hypofractionation remains highly investigational. Regarding target volumes, several different guidelines have been published to address the need for standardization of postoperative target delineation. The recent GFRU (Groupe Francophone de Radiotherapie Urologique) recommendations could represent an international consensus.

BACKGROUND Radiation therapy plays an important role for symptom palliation for intrathoracic malignancies ineligible for curative-intent therapy. Limited data exists regarding the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) versus conformal radiation in intrathoracic tumors for palliation. We report the efficacy of hypofractionated RT (or palliative SBRT) in the symptom management and durable control of lung and non-lung intrathoracic tumors. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of ninety-two thoracic lesions across 76 patients who completed palliative SBRT with doses ranging 25-50 Gy in 5-10 fractions between 2009 and 2019. Symptoms (cough, chest pain, hemoptysis, shortness of breath) were assessed at consult and 1-6 months follow-up. Local control was evaluated using follow-up CT imaging via RECIST criteria. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate symptom palliation and Kaplan-Meier method to analyze local control. RESULTS Of primary lung (Cohort P) lesions, 40% showed stable symptoms, 30% never developed symptoms, and 19% showed symptom relief. CT imaging 1-6 months post-SBRT showed 91% with partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) in Cohort P and 87% with PR or SD in metastatic (Cohort M) lesions. In patients with initial PR/SD, local control until death was achieved in 71% of Cohort P and 84% of Cohort M. Of our symptomatic patients (Cohort S), 98% showed no symptom progression post-radiotherapy. All patients with hemoptysis at presentation achieved hemostasis post-radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Palliative SBRT has the advantage of higher biologic dose without protracted course for patients with limited prognosis. Patients showed significant symptom palliation and long-term local control. Palliative SBRT represents a reasonable treatment modality for incurable thoracic malignancies.

As the use of hypofractionation has spread in the setting of curative prostate radiotherapy, few data are available in the post-operative scenario. This study reports a mono-institutional experience of moderate post-operative hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. In February 2021, we retrospectively assessed the outcomes of 129 patients who received between April 2013 and May 2020 hypofractionated post-operative radiotherapy using Helical Tomotherapy. Toxicity was assessed using CTCAE criteria v4.0. Survival endpoints were calculated with Kaplan–Meier method. Median age and follow-up were, respectively, 67 years and 43 months. Adjuvant and salvage treatment were delivered to 63.5% and 36.4% of patients to a median total dose of 63.8 Gy (61.6–65.25 Gy) in 29 fractions (2.12–2.25 Gy/fraction). Pelvic lymph-nodes irradiation was performed in 67.4% of cases. ADT was added in 50%. Acute toxicity was: G1 and G2 GU events in 36% and 9.3% of cases; G1 and G2 GI events in 29.4% and 13.9%. Late GU toxicity occurred in 12.4% of cases: 3.1% G1, 7.7% G2 and 1.5% G3 events; GI toxicity consisted of 1.5% G1 and 7.7% G2 events. Biochemical relapse occurred in 26.3% of cases, recording no significant differences between adjuvant and salvage (p = 0.67), with 4- and 5-years bRFS rates of 78.7% and 75.6%. Two patients died of progressive disease and eight for non-oncological causes resulting in 3-years overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates of 98% and 98.4%. Our experience supports the use of moderate hypofractionation for prostate bed radiotherapy, with minimal toxicity and promising results in terms of clinical outcomes.

Purpose: To investigate the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who are unfit for surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) at our institution.Materials and Methods: From May 2007 to December 2018, HFRT was used to treat 68 lesions in 64 patients who were unsuitable for SBRT because of central tumor location, large tumor size, or contiguity with the chest wall. The HFRT schedule included a dose of 50–70 Gy delivered in 10 fractions over 2 weeks. The primary outcome was freedom from local progression (FFLP), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and toxicities.Results: The median follow-up period was 25.5 months (range, 5.3 to 119.9 months). The FFLP rates were 79.8% and 67.8% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The OS rates were 82.8% and 64.1% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. A larger planning target volume was associated with lower FFLP (p = 0.023). Dose escalation was not associated with FFLP (p = 0.964). Four patients (6.3%) experienced grade 3–5 pulmonary toxicities. Tumor location, central or peripheral, was not associated with either grade 3 or higher toxicity.Conclusion: HFRT with 50–70 Gy in 10 fractions demonstrated acceptable toxicity; however, the local control rate can be improved compared with the results of SBRT. More studies are required in patients who are unfit for SBRT to investigate the optimal fractionation scheme.

The outcomes of five fraction stereotactic radiotherapy (hfSRT) following brain metastasectomy were evaluated and compared with published series. 30 Gy in 5 fractions HfSRT prescribed to the surgical cavity was reduced to 25 Gy if the volume of ‘brain−GTV’ receiving 20 Gy exceeded 20 cm3. Endpoints were local recurrence, nodular leptomeningeal recurrence, new brain metastases and radionecrosis. The literature was searched for reports of clinical and dosimetric outcomes following postoperative hfSRT in 3–5 fractions. 39 patients with 40 surgical cavities were analyzed. Cavity local control rate at 1 year was 33/40 (82.5%). 3 local failures followed 30 Gy/5 fractions and 4 with 25 Gy/5 fractions. The incidence of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) was 7/40 (17.5%). No grade 3–4 toxicities, particularly no radionecrosis, were reported. The incidence of distant brain metastases was 15/40 (37.5%). The median overall survival was 15 months. Across 13 published series, the weighted mean local control was 83.1% (adjusted for sample size), the mean incidence of LMD was 14.9% (7–34%) and the mean rate of radionecrosis was 10.3% (0–20.6%). Postoperative hfSRT can be delivered with 25–30 Gy in 5 fractions with efficacy in excess of 82% and no significant toxicity when the dose to ‘brain−GTV’ does not exceed 20 cm3.

Summary Background Two radiotherapy fractionation schedules are used to treat locally advanced bladder cancer: 64 Gy in 32 fractions over 6·5 weeks and a hypofractionated schedule of 55 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks. Long-term outcomes of these schedules in several cohort studies and case series suggest that response, survival, and toxicity are similar, but no direct comparison has been published. The present study aimed to assess the non-inferiority of 55 Gy in 20 fractions to 64 Gy in 32 fractions in terms of invasive locoregional control and late toxicity in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer. Methods We did a meta-analysis of individual patient data from patients (age ≥18 years) with locally advanced bladder cancer (T1G3 [high-grade non-muscle invasive] or T2–T4, N0M0) enrolled in two multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trials done in the UK: BC2001 (NCT00024349; assessing addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy) and BCON (NCT00033436; assessing hypoxia-modifying therapy combined with radiotherapy). In each trial, the fractionation schedule was chosen according to local standard practice. Co-primary endpoints were invasive locoregional control (non-inferiority margin hazard ratio [HR]=1·25); and late bladder or rectum toxicity, assessed with the Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic tool (non-inferiority margin for absolute risk difference [RD]=10%). If non-inferiority was met for invasive locoregional control, superiority could be considered if the 95% CI for the treatment effect excluded the null effect (HR=1). One-stage individual patient data meta-analysis models for the time-to-event and binary outcomes were used, accounting for trial differences, within-centre correlation, randomised treatment received, baseline variable imbalances, and potential confounding from relevant prognostic factors. Findings 782 patients with known fractionation schedules (456 from the BC2001 trial and 326 from the BCON trial; 376 (48%) received 64 Gy in 32 fractions and 406 (52%) received 55 Gy in 20 fractions) were included in our meta-analysis. Median follow-up was 120 months (IQR 99–159). Patients who received 55 Gy in 20 fractions had a lower risk of invasive locoregional recurrence than those who received 64 Gy in 32 fractions (adjusted HR 0·71 [95% CI 0·52–0·96]). Both schedules had similar toxicity profiles (adjusted RD −3·37% [95% CI −11·85 to 5·10]). Interpretation A hypofractionated schedule of 55 Gy in 20 fractions is non-inferior to 64 Gy in 32 fractions with regard to both invasive locoregional control and toxicity, and is superior with regard to invasive locoregional control. 55 Gy in 20 fractions should be adopted as a standard of care for bladder preservation in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer. Funding Cancer Research UK.

Introduction: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hSRT) has emerged as an alternative to single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for the treatment of intracranial meningiomas (ICMs). However, there is a need for data showing long-term efficacy and complication rates, particularly for larger tumors in sensitive locations. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on adult patients with ICMs seen at a tertiary care center. Eligible patients were treated with the CyberKnife platform and had a planned treatment course of 3–5 fractions from 2011–2020. The local control was assessed based on radiographic stability and the late toxicity/radionecrosis rates were recorded. Radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: In total, 62 patients (age 26–87) with 67 treated tumors were included in this study with a median follow-up of 64.7 months. RT was delivered as the primary treatment in 62.7% of cases and for recurrence in 37.3%. The most common tumor locations were the convexity of the brain and the base of the skull. The tumor sizes ranged from 0.1–51.8 cc and the median planning target volume was 4.9 cc. The most common treatment schedule was 18 Gy in 3 fractions. The five-year PFS and OS were 85.2% and 91.0%, respectively. The late grade III/IV toxicity rate was 3.2% and the radionecrosis rate was 4.8%. Conclusions: Based on our data, hSRT remains an effective modality to treat low-grade ICMs with acceptable long-term toxicity and radionecrosis rates. hSRT should be offered to patients who are not ideal candidates for SRS while preserving the benefits of hypofractionation.

Background and purpose Breast cancer locoregional (LR) radiation in the elderly requires careful consideration between the benefits of aggressive treatment and its potential toll on these patients. Extreme weekly LR hypofractionated radiation (HFRT), delivering >5 Gy per fraction, may be better suited in such a population. It represents a good compromise between RT omission and exhaustive daily radiation. This study aims to report the local and LR control rate as well as the acute and long-term side effects of the elderly patients treated with HFRT in our institution, and to compare these results to those from the literature. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective study by reviewing medical records of elderly patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant once-weekly LR HFRT between 2011 and 2020. Fifty patients presenting with primary non-metastatic node-positive breast tumors were included. Treatment outcomes including local/LR control and overall survival were reported. Early and late toxicity profiles were also assessed. Results After a median follow-up of 4.8 years, only one local recurrence in the chest wall occurred and there was no regional recurrence. The distant metastatic rate was 6%. The long-term recurrence-free survival rate was 80% at 5 years. The cause specific survival rate was 90% at 5 years. The overall survival rate was 69.4% and 55.5% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. There were 44 (88%) patients with Grade 1 or 2 early toxicity. There was no Grade 3 or higher acute toxicity registered. Late toxicity was mainly Grade 1 or 2 subcutaneous fibrosis, lymphoedema, and neuropathy except for one patient with Grade 3 fibrosis. Conclusion Extreme LR HFRT is well tolerated with good outcomes and is a good alternative for elderly and frail patients. Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of such a regimen. Further randomized trials assessing both oncologic outcome and toxicity profile are justified.

This study explored the dosimetric difference between hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HFWBI) with sequential boost (SEB) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) based on supine and prone positions to identify the superior boost mode and superior position. Thirty breast cancer patients eligible for HFWBI after breast-conserving surgery were enrolled. All patients underwent 3DCT simulation scanning in both supine and prone positions. For the SEB-HFWBI plan, the dose prescribed for the planning target volume (PTV) of whole breast (WB) was 2.67 Gy per fraction with a total of 15 fractions, followed by a sequential boost of 3.2 Gy per fraction to the PTV of tumor bed (TB) in 3 fractions. For the SIB-HFWBI plan, the dose prescribed for the PTV of WB was 2.67 Gy per fraction with a total of 15 fractions, with a simultaneously integrated boost of 3.2 Gy per fraction to the PTV of TB with a total of 15 fractions. Regardless of the position, for the PTV of TB, the conformal index (CI) in the SIB-HFWBI plans was greater than those in the SEB-HFWBI plans (T = − 8.114, − 8.114; both P Z = − 3.340, − 3.501; all P

Background Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a diverse group of rare malignant tumors. Currently, five to six weeks of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) combined with surgery constitute the mainstay of therapy for localized high-grade sarcomas (G2–G3). Growing evidence suggests that shortening preoperative RT courses by hypofractionation neither increases toxicity rates nor impairs oncological outcomes. Instead, shortening RT courses may improve therapy adherence, raise cost-effectiveness, and provide more treatment opportunities for a wider range of patients. Presumed higher rates of adverse effects and worse outcomes are concerns about hypofractionated RT (HFRT) for STS. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence on preoperative HFRT for the treatment of STS and discusses toxicity and oncological outcomes compared to normofractionated RT. Methods We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials describing outcomes for preoperative HFRT in the management of STS using PubMed, the Cochrane library, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, and Ovid Medline. We followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Trials on retroperitoneal sarcomas, postoperative RT, and hyperthermia were excluded. Articles published until November 30th, 2021, were included. Results Initial search yielded 94 articles. After removal of duplicate and ineligible articles, 13 articles qualified for analysis. Eight phase II trials and five retrospective analyses were reviewed. Most trials applied 5 × 5 Gy preoperatively in patients with high-grade STS. HFRT courses did not show increased rates of adverse events compared to historical trials of normofractionated RT. Toxicity rates were mostly comparable or lower than in trials of normofractionated RT. Moreover, HFRT achieved comparable local control rates with shorter duration of therapy. Currently, more than 15 prospective studies on HFRT + / − chemotherapy are ongoing. Conclusions Retrospective data and phase II trials suggest preoperative HFRT to be a reasonable treatment modality for STS. Oncological outcomes and toxicity profiles were favorable. To date, our knowledge is mostly derived from phase II data. No randomized phase III trial comparing normofractionated and HFRT in STS has been published yet. Multiple ongoing phase II trials applying HFRT to investigate acute and late toxicity will hopefully bring forth valuable findings.

External beam radiotherapy is an effective curative treatment option for localized prostate cancer, the most common cancer in men worldwide. However, conventionally fractionated courses of curative external beam radiotherapy are usually 8–9 weeks long, resulting in a substantial burden to patients and the health-care system. This problem is exacerbated in low-income and middle-income countries where health-care resources might be scarce and patient funds limited. Trials have shown a clinical equipoise between hypofractionated schedules of radiotherapy and conventionally fractionated treatments, with the advantage of drastically shortening treatment durations with the use of hypofractionation. The hypofractionated schedules are supported by modern consensus guidelines for implementation in clinical practice. Furthermore, several economic evaluations have shown improved cost effectiveness of hypofractionated therapy compared with conventional schedules. However, these techniques demand complex infrastructure and advanced personnel training. Thus, a number of practical considerations must be borne in mind when implementing hypofractionation in low-income and middle-income countries, but the potential gain in the treatment of this patient population is substantial., Conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy is an effective treatment for localized prostate cancer, but long treatment programmes result in a substantial burden to patients and the health-care system, which is particularly problematic in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) where health-care resources might be scarce and patient funds limited. Here, the authors discuss the outcomes and benefits of hypofractionation — in terms of both oncology and economics — and how it could be used to improve prostate cancer care in LMICs., Key points The global burden of prostate cancer is increasing and prostate cancer is becoming a major source of health-care burden in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).Radiotherapy is an essential treatment modality in the management of prostate cancer. However, radiotherapy resources are lacking in LMICs, resulting in excess morbidity and mortality.Hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules offer an opportunity to maintain excellent treatment outcomes while shortening curative radiotherapy courses. This approach expands the treatment capacity and could improve crucial access in communities with limited radiotherapy resources.Initial investments are required for technological upgrades, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy, as well as in specialized training in order to optimally provide hypofractionated treatment. Discussion amongst government agencies and device manufacturers is essential to lower these costs.Personnel training and access to external consultation are critical resources for developing radiotherapy centres. Information and communication technologies enable remote guidance between developing and developed radiotherapy centres.In the long term, hypofractionation programmes result in long-term cost savings and simultaneously expand patient access to a curative modality in the management of prostate cancer.

Background The phase 3 NCT00793962 trial demonstrated that postmastectomy hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) was noninferior to conventional fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT) in patients with high-risk breast cancer. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of postmastectomy HFRT vs CFRT based on the NCT00793962 trial. Methods A Markov model was adopted to synthesize the medical costs and health benefits of patients with high-risk breast cancer based on data from the NCT00793962 trial. Main outcomes were discounted lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We employed a time-dependent horizon from Chinese, French and USA payer perspectives. Model robustness was evaluated with one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results Patients receiving CFRT versus HFRT gained an incremental 0.0163 QALYs, 0.0118 QALYs and 0.0028 QALYs; meanwhile an incremental cost of $2351.92, $4978.34 and $8812.70 from Chinese, French and USA payer perspectives, respectively. Thus CFRT versus HFRT yielded an ICER of $144,281.47, $420,636.10 and $3,187,955.76 per QALY from Chinese, French and USA payer perspectives, respectively. HFRT could maintain a trend of >50% probabilities of cost-effectiveness below a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of $178,882.00 in China, while HFRT was dominant relative to CFRT, regardless of the WTP values in France and the USA. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the ICERs were most sensitive to the parameters of overall survival after radiotherapy. Conclusions Postmastectomy HFRT could be used as a cost-effective substitute for CFRT in patients with high-risk breast cancer and should be considered in appropriately selected patients.

Introduction To investigate the treatment outcomes of passive scattering proton beam therapy using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) or hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) for inoperable patients or those who refused surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods From January 2016 to December 2019, we retrospectively analyzed 42 patients with stage I NSCLC treated with proton beam therapy. The initially intended dose regimen was 60 cobalt Gray equivalents (CGE) in 4 fractions; however, sequentially modified dose regimens were used when the dose-volume constraints could not be met. The median total dose was 50 CGE (range 50–70 CGE), while the corresponding median biologically effective dose using $$\alpha{/}\beta$$ α / β = 10 (BED10) was 112.5 CGE (range 96–150 CGE). Results The median follow-up time was 40 months (interquartile range 32–48 months). Among the 42 treated patients, 33 had pathologically proven cancers of which most were adenocarcinoma (n = 21, 64%). The 3-year overall survival rate was 71.8%. The estimated rates of local control and progression free survival at 3 years were 91.5% and 66.9%, respectively. Thirteen patients experienced disease progression consisting of three local, six regional, and nine distant failures. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. Conclusion Passive scattering proton beam therapy for stage I NSCLC using SABR or hypofractionated RT was safe and showed high LC rates.

Purpose: To date, studies regarding the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) versus standard of care (SoC) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not shown a significant effect in terms of overall survival (OS). Additionally, the effect of PCI among high-risk patients has been scarcely studied. The objective of this randomized phase 2 study was to evaluate the role of PCI in a population of patients at high risk for development of brain metastases (BM). Methods and Materials: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed NSCLC without baseline BM, harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements, or elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels at the time of diagnosis. Participants received systemic therapy according to molecular status, those without progressive disease were then assigned to receive SoC or SoC thorn PCI (25 Gy in 10 fractions). The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of brain metastases (CBM). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and OS. Quality of life and neurocognitive function are discussed in a separate article (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01603849). Results: From May 2012 to December 2017, 84 patients were enrolled in the study, with 41 patients allocated to receive PCI and 43 received SoC. Patients allocated to receive PCI had a CBM at 24 months of 7% versus 38% in those allocated to the SoC arm. PCI was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.12 (95% confidence interval, 0.035-0.42) for developing BM. A benefit in OS was also observed (64.5 vs 19.8 months; hazard ratio: 0.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.78; P = .007). Conclusions: Among a selected population at high risk for developing BM, PCI significantly decreased CBM in addition to increasing progression-free survival and OS. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate PCI in epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements, or elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with NSCLC, showing a significant improvement in CBM. This relevant information should be of particular importance in the context of patients without access to third-generation targeted agents. Further studies are warranted to ascertain this effect. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Purpose Data comparing moderately hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT) are lacking. We aim to compare late toxicity profiles of patients with early-stage prostate cancer treated with moderately hypofractionated PBT and IMRT. Methods and Materials This multi-institutional analysis included patients with low- or intermediate-risk biopsy-proven prostate adenocarcinoma from 7 tertiary referral centers treated from 1998 to 2018. All patients were treated with moderately hypofractionated radiation, defined as 250 to 300 cGy per daily fraction given for 4 to 6 weeks, and stratified by use of IMRT or PBT. Primary outcomes were late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Adjusted toxicity rates were calculated using inverse probability of treatment weighting, accounting for race, National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group, age, pretreatment International Prostate Symptom Score (GU only), and anticoagulant use (GI only). Results A total of 1850 patients were included: 1282 IMRT (median follow-up 80.0 months) and 568 PBT (median follow-up 43.9 months). Overall toxicity rates were low, with the majority of patients experiencing no late GU (56.6%, n = 1048) or late GI (74.4%, n = 1377) toxicity. No difference was seen in the rates of late toxicity between the groups, with late grade 3+ GU toxicity of 2.0% versus 3.9% (odds ratio [OR] 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.17-1.28) and late grade 2+ GI toxicity of 14.6% versus 4.7% (OR 2.69; confidence interval 0.80-9.05) for the PBT and IMRT cohorts, respectively. On multivariable analysis, no factors were significantly predictive of GU toxicity, and only anticoagulant use was significantly predictive of GI toxicity (OR 1.90; P = .008). Conclusions In this large, multi-institutional analysis of 1850 patients with early-stage prostate cancer, treatment with moderately hypofractionated IMRT and PBT resulted in low rates of toxicity. No difference was seen in late GI and GU toxicity between the modalities during long-term follow-up. Both treatments are safe and well tolerated.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of hypofractionated schedules for metastatic bone/bone marrow lesions in children and to investigate dosimetric differences to the healthy surrounding tissues compared to conventional schedules. METHODS 27 paediatric patients (mean age, 7 years) with 50 metastatic bone/bone marrow lesions (n = 26 cranial, n = 24 extra-cranial) from solid primary tumours (neuroblastoma and sarcoma) were included. The PTV was a 2 mm expansion of the GTV. A prescription dose of 36 and 54 Gy EQD2α/β=10 was used for neuroblastoma and sarcoma lesions, respectively. VMAT plans were optimized for each single lesion using different fractionation schedules: conventional (30/20 fractions, V95% ≥ 99%, D0.1cm3 ≤ 107%) and hypofractionated (15/10/5/3 fractions, V100% ≥ 95%, D0.1cm3 ≤ 120%). Relative EQD2 differences in OARs Dmean between the different schedules were compared. RESULTS PTV coverage was met for all plans independently of the fractionation schedule and for all lesions (V95% range 95.5-100%, V100% range 95.1-100%), with exception of the vertebrae (V100% range 63.5-91.0%). For most OARs, relative mean reduction in the Dmean was seen for the hypofractionated plans compared to the conventional plans, with largest sparing in the 5 fractions (< 43%) followed by the 3 fractions schedule (< 40%). In case of PTV overlap with an OAR, a significant increase in dose for the OAR was observed with hypofractionation. CONCLUSIONS For the majority of the cases, iso-effective plans with hypofractionation were feasible with similar or less dose in the OARs. The most suitable fractionation schedule should be personalised depending on the spatial relationship between the PTV and OARs and the prescription dose.

Purpose Autoimmune connective tissue disease (CTD) has historically represented a relative contraindication to breast conservation (BC) among patients with early-stage breast cancer. Controversy exists regarding the use of hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) among patients with CTDs. We evaluated acute and late toxicity in patients with breast cancer and CTD treated with BC. Methods and Materials Of 1983 patients treated with BC from 2012 to 2016, we identified 91 patients with an autoimmune disease (AD). Each patient was matched to a control without AD based on age, RT field, and fractionation. RT toxicity and clinician-rated cosmesis were compared between cases and controls. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The median follow-up was 49.9 months for cases and 53.0 months for controls, and 67% of cases and controls were treated with hypofractionated RT. There was no difference in grade 2/3 acute toxicity between cases and controls (26.4% vs. 16.5%, respectively; P = .148). There was a significantly higher rate of grade 2/3 late toxicity among cases (25.8% vs 12.1% among controls; P = .049). Active AD at the time of RT increased the rate of grade 2/3 late toxicity compared with controls (41.7% in cases vs. 11.4% in controls; P = .018). Among patients treated with hypofractionated RT, there was no difference in acute or late grade 2/3 toxicity between cases and controls (acute: 13.1% in cases vs. 11.5% in controls [P > 0.9]; late: 11.9% in cases vs. 13.1% in controls [P > 0.9]). The rates of good/excellent clinician-rated cosmesis were similar between groups (92.9% in cases vs. 98.9% in controls; P = .142). Conclusions In the largest matched case-control study of patients with CTD treated with conventional and hypofractionated RT, we demonstrate low rates of radiation toxicity, with good to excellent clinician-rated cosmesis. There was increased late toxicity in cases, especially in patients with active AD at time of RT. There was no increase in acute or late toxicity in the patients treated with hypofractionation.

Concurrent platinum-based chemoradiation (CRT) followed by consolidation PD-L1 inhibition with durvalumab is the standard of care for patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC [1]. However, in high-...

Purpose The establishment of a preclinical model of the abscopal effect on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and evaluation of whether the hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) multitumor Hepa1-6 mouse HCC model could be used to suppress nonradiated tumor mass was performed in this study. Methods and Materials Hepa1-6 mouse liver cancer cell lines were used to form tumors. Immunogenicity was analyzed using ELISpot and immune cell labeled antibody. Interferon (IFN) β expression was confirmed through polymerase chain reaction. Results After investigation, the intratumoral transcription of type Ⅰ IFN increased by 2-fold. The antitumor immune response to Hepa 1-6 cells induced by radiation was increased. Moreover, the influx of activated CD8+ T cells was increased in nonirradiated tumors. The number of dendritic cells and activation status were evaluated by flow cytometry on the second day after irradiation. Flow cytometry revealed a significantly increased dendritic cell population expressing the CD11c molecule in tumor-draining lymph nodes. Furthermore, because irradiation leads to adaptation of immune resistance of tumor cells against RT, we sought to elucidate a potent tool to overcome the resistance and confirm the ability of PD-L1 antibody to survive late RT resistance. Conclusions The immunologic mechanism of the abscopal effect was revealed and the application of PD-L1 inhibitor successfully performed as a breakthrough in late RT resistance in the Hepa1-6 tumor model.

Approximately 30% of patients who undergo radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer develop disease progression. The only potentially curative treatment in these patients is postoperative radiotherapy with or without hormonotherapy. One of the standards of care in nonsurgical patients is hypofractionated radiotherapy. However, the current evidence based is insufficient to define the optimal dose and fractionation schedule for postoperative radiotherapy. In this context, the aim of this editorial is to assess the main efficacy and toxicity data for postoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy and discuss the potential to implement this fractionation in routine clinical practice.

Purpose To evaluate, in a series of early breast cancer (BC) patients treated with hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), whether N-terminal–pro hormone B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay measurements can predict acute clinical or preclinical cardiotoxicity. Patients and Methods The study comprised 44 consecutive patients, who underwent conservative surgery with or without (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and hypofractionated adjuvant RT. The RT schedule consisted in a total dose of 42.4 Gy in 16 fractions administered 5 days per week. Twenty-one patients received a subsequent boost to the tumor bed consisting of a total dose of 10 Gy in 4 fractions delivered via a direct electron field. All patients underwent 12-lead electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and cardiac clinical examinations before RT to assess cardiovascular risk factors; these examinations were repeated yearly for 5 consecutive years. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and NT-proBNP were analyzed from serum samples at baseline, after delivery of the fourth and 16th RT fractions, and 12 months after treatment completion. Results No increase in cardiac troponin I and B-type natriuretic peptide levels related to left breast irradiation was observed. No statistical difference in NT-proBNP and high-sensitivity troponin I levels between left- and right-sided BC was found. An increase was observed of B-type natriuretic peptide levels at baseline, during treatment, and until 12 months after RT related to hypertension, with the P value near to the .05 threshold for age and chemotherapy. Conclusion Conformational hypofractionated RT in left-sided BC may not cause acute myocardial damage. Early cardiac screening may be used to identify patients with cardiologic risk factors, patients who are older than 60 years, and patients who received chemotherapy that could result in clinically relevant cardiac pathologies.

Systematic review for the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer (HR-PCa, D'Amico classification risk system) with external body radiation therapy (EBRT)+brachytherapy-boost (BT-boost) or with EBRT+stereotactic body RT-boost (SBRT-boost). In March 2020, 391 English citations on PubMed matched with search terms "high risk prostate cancer boost". Respectively 9 and 48 prospective and retrospective studies were on BT-boost and 7 retrospective studies were on SBRT-boost. Two SBRT-boost trials were prospective. Only one study (ASCENDE-RT) directly compared the gold standard treatment [dose-escalation (DE)-EBRT+androgen deprivation treatment (ADT)] versus EBRT+ADT+BT-boost. Biochemical control rates at 9 years were 83% in the experimental arm versus 63% in the standard arm. Cumulative incidence of late grade 3 urinary toxicity in the experimental arm and in the standard arm was respectively 18% and 5%. Two recent studies with HR-PCa (National Cancer Database) demonstrated better overall survival with BT-boost (low dose rate LDR or high dose rate HDR) compared with DE-EBRT. These recent findings demonstrate the superiority of EBRT+BT-boost+ADT versus DE-EBRT+ADT for HR-PCa. It seems that EBRT+BT-boost+ADT could now be considered as a gold standard treatment for HR-PCa. HDR or LDR are options. SBRT-boost represents an attractive alternative, but the absence of randomised trials does not allow us to conclude for HR-PCa. Prospective randomised international phase III trials or meta-analyses could improve the level of evidence of SBRT-boost for HR-PCa.

PURPOSE: Hypofractionated radiation therapy can be used to treat patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer unable to have radical therapy. Toxicity is a key concern, but adaptive plan-of the day (POD) image-guided radiation therapy delivery could improve outcomes by minimizing the volume of normal tissue irradiated. The HYBRID trial assessed the multicenter implementation, safety, and efficacy of this strategy.METHODS: HYBRID is a Phase II randomized trial that was conducted at 14 UK hospitals. Patients with T2-T4aN0M0 muscle-invasive bladder cancer unsuitable for radical therapy received 36 Gy in 6 weekly fractions, randomized (1:1) to standard planning (SP) or adaptive planning (AP) using a minimization algorithm. For AP, a pretreatment cone beam computed tomography (CT) was used to select the POD from 3 plans (small, medium, and large). Follow-up included standard cystoscopic, radiologic, and clinical assessments. The primary endpoint was nongenitourinary Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3 (≥G3) toxicity within 3 months of radiation therapy. A noncomparative single stage design aimed to exclude ≥30% toxicity rate in each planning group in patients who received ≥1 fraction of radiation therapy. Local control at 3-months (both groups combined) was a key secondary endpoint.RESULTS: Between April 15, 2014, and August 10, 2016, 65 patients were enrolled (SP, n = 32; AP, n = 33). The median follow-up time was 38.8 months (interquartile range [IQR], 36.8-51.3). The median age was 85 years (IQR, 81-89); 68% of participants (44 of 65) were male; and 98% of participants had grade 3 urothelial cancer. In 63 evaluable participants, CTCAE ≥G3 nongenitourinary toxicity rates were 6% (2 of 33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7%-20.2%) for the AP group and 13% (4 of 30; 95% CI, 3.8%-30.7%) for the SP group. Disease was present in 9/48 participants assessed at 3 months, giving a local control rate of 81.3% (95% CI, 67.4%-91.1%).CONCLUSIONS: POD adaptive radiation therapy was successfully implemented across multiple centers. Weekly ultrahypofractionated 36 Gy/6 fraction radiation therapy is safe and provides good local control rates in this older patient population.

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: Several prospective randomized trials have shown that hypofractionation has the same efficacy and safety as the conventional fractionation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. There are many benefits of hypofractionation, including a more convenient schedule for the patients and better use of resources, which is especially important in low- and middle-income countries like Brasil. Based on these data, the Brazilian Society of Radiotherapy (Sociedade Brasileira de Radioterapia) organized this consensus to guide and support the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer in Brasil. METHODS: The relevant literature regarding moderate hypofractionation (mHypo) and ultra-hypofractionation (uHypo) was reviewed and discussed by a group of experts from public and private centers of different parts of Brasil. Several key questions concerning clinical indications, outcomes and technological requirements for hypofractionation were discussed and voted. For each question, consensus was reached if there was an agreement of at least 75% of the panel members. RESULTS: The recommendations are described in this article. CONCLUSION: This initiative will assist Brazilian radiation oncologists and medical physicists to safely treat localized prostate cancer patients with hypofractionation.

The purpose of this study was to report preliminary data of a randomized phase III trial comparing hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HWBI) and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).The HYPAB trial enrolled postmenopausal women with biopsy-proven infiltrating breast cancer, clinically negative axilla, single T1 to T2 tumors, who were treated with breast-conserving surgery. Patients were randomized 1:1 after surgery to HWBI (40.5 Gy whole breast, 48.0 Gy to surgical bed, 15 fractions over 3 weeks) or APBI (30 Gy delivered in 5 fractions of 6 Gy given on alternate days on the surgical bed). Cosmetic outcome was the primary end point of the study.A total of 172 patients were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 36 months, 5 local failures and 3 locoregional failures were recorded, with no difference between the 2 treatment arms. Use of HWBI as compared with APBI was significantly correlated with increased incidence of overall (62% vs. 14%; P .001) and grade 2 (18% vs. 1%; P .001) acute skin toxicity. APBI was correlated with a lower incidence of overall late toxicity as compared with HWBI (18% vs. 41%; P = .001), but no significant difference was found in term of occurrence of grade 2 events (1% vs. 4%; P = NS). At comparative assessment between baseline and post-radiotherapy evaluation, impairment in cosmetic outcome was reported in 19 (11%) patients. Owing to premature closure of the study, no per-protocol comparison between the treatment arms was performed.APBI with the VMAT technique is safe and feasible, with lower acute toxicity when compared with HWBI.