201. Screening and Vaccination Against Measles and Varicella Among Health Care Workers: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis
- Author
-
Oh Jeong, Hyunju Yang, and Ji-Suk Lee
- Subjects
Pediatrics ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,Health Personnel ,Measles ,03 medical and health sciences ,symbols.namesake ,Chickenpox ,0302 clinical medicine ,Health care ,medicine ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Fisher's exact test ,Retrospective Studies ,0303 health sciences ,030306 microbiology ,Transmission (medicine) ,business.industry ,Risk of infection ,Vaccination ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Cost-effectiveness analysis ,medicine.disease ,Immunization ,symbols ,business - Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the most cost-effective strategy of screening and vaccinating measles- and varicella-susceptible health care workers (HCWs). A retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Korea with 300 HCWs who were at high risk of infection. Self-reported histories of vaccinations, infectious diseases, and contact with such cases were collected. Serological tests for immunoglobulin G titers of measles and varicella were performed. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, χ2 test, and Fisher exact test. Seropositivity rates were 96.3% for measles and 95.7% for varicella. Four different strategies (cases) for vaccination were investigated. Considering the progressive decline in antibody concentrations and the false-positive responses in self-reported histories, case 3, which involved administering 2-dose vaccinations to susceptible HCWs demonstrated by antibody screening tests for both measles and varicella, was the most cost-effective strategy. Health care facilities should establish mandatory immunization policies that reduce the risk of transmission of vaccine-preventable diseases.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF