Search

Objective Trabectedin demonstrated significantly improved disease control in leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma patients in a global phase 3 trial (NCT01343277). A post hoc analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of trabectedin or dacarbazine in women with uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS), the largest subgroup of enrolled patients (40%). Methods Of 577 patients randomized 2:1 to receive trabectedin 1.5mg/m 2 by 24-hour IV infusion or dacarbazine 1g/m 2 by 20–120-minute IV infusion once every three weeks, 232 had uLMS (trabectedin: 144; dacarbazine: 88). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR: complete responses+partial responses+stable disease [SD] for at least 18weeks), duration of response (DOR), and safety. Results PFS for trabectedin was 4.0months compared with 1.5months for dacarbazine (hazard ratio [HR]=0.57; 95% CI 0.41–0.81; P =0.0012). OS was similar (trabectedin 13.4months vs. dacarbazine 12.9months, HR=0.89; 95% CI 0.65–1.24; P =0.51) between groups. ORR was 11% with trabectedin vs. 9% with dacarbazine ( P =0.82). CBR for trabectedin was 31% vs. 18% with dacarbazine ( P =0.05); median DOR was 6.5months for trabectedin vs. 4.1months for dacarbazine ( P =0.32). Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events observed in ≥10% of patients in the trabectedin group included transient aminotransferase (aspartate/alanine) elevations, anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. Conclusions In this post hoc subset analysis of patients with uLMS who had received prior anthracycline therapy, trabectedin treatment resulted in significantly longer PFS versus dacarbazine, with an acceptable safety profile. There was no difference in OS.

Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is a rare, biologically aggressive soft tissue neoplasm of uncertain differentiation, most often arising in the abdominal and pelvic cavities of adolescents and young adults with a striking male predominance. Histologically, it is characterized by islands of uniform small round cells in prominent desmoplastic stroma, and it has a polyimmunophenotypic profile, typically expressing WT1 and cytokeratin, desmin, and neural/neuroendocrine differentiation markers to varying degrees. Tumors at other sites and with variant morphology are more rarely described. DSRCT is associated with a recurrent t(11;22)(p13;q12) translocation, leading to the characteristic EWSR1-WT1 gene fusion. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), to detect EWSR1 rearrangement, and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to assess for EWSR1-WT1 fusion transcripts are routine diagnostic ancillary tools. We present a large institutional comparative series of FISH and RT-PCR for DSRCT diagnosis. Twenty-six specimens (from 25 patients) histologically diagnosed as DSRCT were assessed for EWSR1 rearrangement and EWSR1-WT1 fusion transcripts. Of these 26 specimens, 24 yielded positive results with either FISH or RT-PCR or both. FISH was performed in 23 samples, with EWSR1 rearrangement seen in 21 (91.3%). RT-PCR was performed in 18 samples, of which 13 (72.2%) harbored EWSR1-WT1 fusion transcripts. The sensitivity of FISH in detecting DSRCT was 91.3%, and that of RT-PCR was 92.8% following omission of four technical failures. Therefore, both methods are comparable in terms of sensitivity. FISH is more sensitive if technical failures for RT-PCR are taken into account, and RT-PCR is more specific in confirming DSRCT. Both methods complement each other by confirming cases that the other method may not. In isolation, FISH is a relatively non-specific diagnostic adjunct due to the number of different neoplasms that can harbor EWSR1 rearrangement, such as Ewing sarcoma. However, in cases with appropriate morphology and a typical pattern of immunostaining, FISH is confirmatory of the diagnosis.

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are rare tumors and with complex treatment. In this manuscript we give an overview of current standards in treatment of this disease and discuss new developments.Surgery with complete resection of the primary tumor is still the only curative modality. The role of preoperative radiotherapy is not clear and is currently being investigated in a clinical trial. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is not the standard of care but can be considered occasionally when complete resection is uncertain. Local and distant recurrent disease carries a dismal prognosis, although long-term survival can be achieved. Liposarcomas tend to recur locally, whereas distant recurrences are more often seen in leiomyosarcoma and other subtypes. Outcome improves when patients are treated in high volume sarcoma centers. In the metastatic setting, newer systemic agents have recently been approved.Treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas is complex and all patients should be treated in multidisciplinary sarcoma centers. Increasing international collaboration of expert centers in sharing expertise and performing clinical trials might lead to better treatment and improved survival.

The grading of soft tissue sarcomas is one of the most important prognostic factors and determines patient management. Although grading of most adult-type soft tissue sarcomas on biopsies correlates highly with the final grading on the excision specimen, it appears less reliable for tumors of smooth muscle. We assessed the pathologic findings for smooth muscle neoplasms diagnosed by core biopsy at our tertiary sarcoma center, and compared them with those in the subsequent excision specimens. A total of 100 patients with leiomyosarcoma first diagnosed on core biopsy and with a subsequent excision were identified and the accuracy of the biopsy grade determined by comparison with the excision grade. Differences in other salient histologic parameters were also noted. A grade difference between biopsy and excision specimens of leiomyosarcomas was found in 68% of cases, with all these cases showing an increase in grade from biopsy to excision specimen. Of the 3 parameters used for grading using the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group Grading System (FNCLCC), necrosis was the score that most commonly differed between biopsy and excision specimen (55%), closely followed by the mitotic count (51%). The grading of soft tissue smooth muscle tumor biopsies has a lower accuracy compared with other adult soft tissue sarcomas and should therefore be taken with caution, particularly as this may be an underrepresentation of the true tumor grade.

Introduction: The heterogeneity of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) presents a formidable management challenge. Consequently, one of the main research goals is to define specific tailored therapy for each histological subtype and to develop a more personalised approach to treatment. The standard first line chemotherapy for advanced STS is doxorubicin, with or without ifosfamide, however, a number of different drugs are emerging as active therapies beyond first-line. Areas covered: Eribulin has recently been approved for advanced liposarcoma, after an anthracycline- containing regimen, demonstrating an overall survival (OS) advantage in liposarcoma and leiomyosar- coma in a randomised Phase III clinical trial. In this manuscript, an overview of the efficacy and safety of eribulin in STS is presented, highlighting different clinical outcomes between histological subtypes and comparing data with other effective drugs used in the treatment of sarcomas. The potential mechan- isms of action of eribulin are also described, including its activity as potent microtubule-destabilizing anticancer agent, which has other antitumor biological effects. Expert commentary: Eribulin is highly effective in some STS populations and also has an acceptable toxicity profile. Further studies are required to better understand the precise mechanism of action of this agent and potential role in combination schedules.

BACKGROUND Patients with metastatic sarcomas have poor outcomes and although the disease may be amenable to immunotherapies, information regarding the immunologic profiles of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) subtypes is limited. METHODS The authors identified patients with the common STS subtypes: leiomyosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), synovial sarcoma (SS), well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma, and myxoid/round cell liposarcoma. Gene expression, immunohistochemistry for programmed cell death protein (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and T-cell receptor Vβ gene sequencing were performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors from 81 patients. Differences in liposarcoma subsets also were evaluated. RESULTS UPS and leiomyosarcoma had high expression levels of genes related to antigen presentation and T-cell infiltration. UPS were found to have higher levels of PD-L1 (P≤.001) and PD-1 (P≤.05) on immunohistochemistry and had the highest T-cell infiltration based on T-cell receptor sequencing, significantly more than SS, which had the lowest (P≤.05). T-cell infiltrates in UPS also were more oligoclonal compared with SS and liposarcoma (P≤.05). A model adjusted for STS histologic subtype found that for all sarcomas, T-cell infiltration and clonality were highly correlated with PD-1 and PD-L1 expression levels (P≤.01). CONCLUSIONS In the current study, the authors provide the most detailed overview of the immune microenvironment in sarcoma subtypes to date. UPS, which is a more highly mutated STS subtype, provokes a substantial immune response, suggesting that it may be well suited to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The SS and liposarcoma subsets are less mutated but do express immunogenic self-antigens, and therefore strategies to improve antigen presentation and T-cell infiltration may allow for successful immunotherapy in patients with these diagnoses. Cancer 2017;123:3291-304. © 2017 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Until recently, advancements in the treatment of patients with adult soft tissue sarcomas have been relatively slow. This is, in part, due to their heterogeneity and rarity. A better understanding of the biology and differences among the various histologies has led to substantial growth in novel strategies. In addition to novel cytotoxic chemotherapies, agents targeting platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFRα), mTOR, and angiogenesis are areas of active investigation. Additionally, with the success of checkpoint inhibitors in other malignancies and early encouraging results of checkpoint inhibitors in some sarcoma subtypes, this approach is being widely investigated in various sarcomas. As we increasingly recognize and treat each sarcoma histology as a separate disease, it is important to spread awareness of the exciting clinical trials available to our patients with these rare malignancies.

Contains fulltext : 170336.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Desmoid tumour/aggressive fibromatosis (DT/AF) is a rare soft-tissue neoplasm that is locally aggressive but does not metastasize. There is no standard systemic treatment for symptomatic patients, although a number of agents are used. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have recently been reported to show useful activity. We reviewed our bi-institutional (Royal Marsden Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals) experience with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor pazopanib in the treatment of progressing DT/AF. Eight patients with DT/AF were treated with pazopanib at Royal Marsden Hospital and Cambridge University Hospitals between June 2012 and June 2016. The median age of the patients was 37.5 (range: 27-60) years. The median duration of pazopanib treatment was 12 (range: 5-22) months and for three patients the treatment is ongoing. Three patients discontinued treatment early (patient preference, intolerable toxicity and logistical reasons, respectively). None of the patients showed radiological progression while on treatment, best responses according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1 were partial response in 3/8 and stable disease in 5/8 cases. Six patients derived clinical benefit from treatment in terms of improved function and/or pain reduction. Median progression-free survival was 13.5 (5-36) months. Only one patient experienced intolerable toxicity (grade 3 hypertension) leading to early treatment discontinuation. In our series of patients with DT/AF, pazopanib demonstrated important activity both in terms of symptom control (75%) and absence of radiological progression (100%). Results of ongoing confirmatory trials are eagerly awaited.

Robin L Jones speaks to Jade Parker, Commissioning Editor: Robin Jones is a medical oncologist specializing in the treatment of bone and soft tissue sarcomas and Head of the Sarcoma Unit at The Royal Marsden. He completed his medical training at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, and his oncology training at The Royal Marsden. His postgraduate research degree, with Professor Dowsett at the Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), evaluated potential predictive and prognostic factors in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In January 2010 he was appointed Associate Professor and Director of the Sarcoma Program at the University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle. He led a successful, grant funded program and continued his translational and clinical trial-based research. The laboratory work with Dr Seth Pollack evaluated novel immunotherapeutic targets in bone and soft tissue sarcomas, and has led to a number of early-phase immunotherapeutic clinical trials in sarcoma. He returned to The Royal Marsden and Institute of Cancer Research in December 2014, as Sarcoma Clinical Trials Team Leader and Consultant Medical Oncologist. He has experience in conducting Phase I, II and III trials, as well as translational studies in sarcoma. He is continuing a number of trials of investigational agents as well as laboratory-based immunotherapy studies.

Surgery, with or without radiation therapy, is the standard of care for primary soft tissue sarcoma, with adjuvant/neodjuvant chemotherapy playing a role only in high-risk patients. Chemotherapy is generally the principal treatment modality for locally advanced or metastatic disease. Within this context, newer techniques and promising new treatments are challenging traditional treatment paradigms. For example, identification of histology-specific treatments is leading the field toward individualized care, with better outcomes. Patients over 65 years represent a sizable and largely undertreated sector of the soft tissue sarcoma population, with many being unsuited to receive anthracycline- or ifosfamide-based chemotherapy. First-line treatment options in this population are discussed.

Soft tissue myoepithelial carcinomas are a rare, malignant subgroup of myoepithelial tumours mostly arising in the extremities with equal predilection for women and men. The mainstay of management of localised disease is complete surgical resection. Despite optimal treatment, 40–45% of tumours recur. Data regarding the efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced and metastatic disease are lacking. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of all patients with soft tissue myoepithelial carcinoma treated at a single referral centre. The secondary aim was to establish the efficacy of systemic therapies in patients with advanced disease. A retrospective review of the prospectively maintained Royal Marsden Sarcoma Unit database was performed to identify soft tissue myoepithelial carcinoma patients treated between 1996 and 2019. Patient baseline characteristics and treatment history were recorded. Response to systemic therapy was evaluated using RECIST 1.1. We identified 24 patients treated at our institution between 1996 and 2019,12 males and 12 females. Median age at presentation was 49.6 years [interquartile range (IQR) 40.5–63.3 years]. Twenty-two out of 24 patients (91.7%) underwent primary surgical resection. Nine patients (37.5%) received systemic treatment. A partial response was documented in one patient treated with doxorubicin. The median progression-free survival for first-line chemotherapy was 9.3 months. Myoepithelial carcinoma frequently recurs after complete surgical resection. Conventional chemotherapy demonstrated some activity in myoepithelial carcinoma, however, more effective systemic therapies are required and enrolment in clinical trial should be encouraged.

Background Resistance to approved inhibitors of KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT), and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) is a clinical challenge for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours. We compared the efficacy and safety of ripretinib, a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor active against a broad spectrum of KIT and PDGFRA mutations, with placebo in patients with previously treated, advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours.Methods In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, we enrolled adult patients in 29 specialised hospitals in 12 countries. We included patients aged 18 years or older who had advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours with progression on at least imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib or documented intolerance to any of these treatments despite dose modifications, and who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either oral ripretinib 150 mg once daily (ripretenib group) or placebo once daily (placebo group). Randomisation was done via an interactive response system using randomly permuted block sizes of six and stratified according to number of previous therapies and ECOG performance status. Patients, investigators, research staff, and the sponsor study team were masked to a patient's treatment allocation until the blinded independent central review (BICR) showed progressive disease for the patient. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed by BICR. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Patients randomly assigned to placebo were permitted to cross over to ripretinib 150 mg at the time of disease progression. The INVICTUS study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT03353753, and with WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, number EUCTR2017-002446-76-ES; follow-up is ongoing.Findings Between Feb 27, 2018, and Nov 16, 2018, 129 of 154 assessed patients were randomly assigned to receive either ripretinib (n=85) or placebo (n=44). At data cutoff (May 31, 2019), at a median follow-up of 6.3 months (IQR 3. 2-8. 2) in the ripretinib group and 1.6 months (1.1-2.7) in the placebo group, 51 patients in the ripretinib group and 37 in the placebo group had had progression-free survival events. In the double-blind period, median progression-free survival was 6.3 months (95% CI 4.6-6.9) with ripretinib compared with 1.0 months (0.9-1.7) with placebo (hazard ratio 0.15, 95% CI 0.09-0.25; p2%) grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the ripretinib group (n=85) included lipase increase (four [5%]), hypertension (three [4%]), fatigue (two [2%]), and hypophosphataemia (two [2%]); in the placebo group (n=43), the most common (>2%) grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia (three [7%]), fatigue (one [2%]), diarrhoea (one [2%]), decreased appetite (one [2%]), dehydration (one [2%]), hyperkalaemia (one [2%]), acute kidney injury (one [2%]), and pulmonary oedema (one [2%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in eight (9%) of 85 patients who received ripretinib and three (7%) of 43 patients who received placebo. Treatment-related deaths occurred in one patient in the placebo group (septic shock and pulmonary oedema) and one patient in the ripretinib group (cause of death unknown; the patient died during sleep).Interpretation Ripretinib significantly improved median progression-free survival compared with placebo and had an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours who were resistant to approved treatments. Copyright (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

A man in his fifties presented with a lump in his left anal/perineal region, which was clinically thought to be a lipoma and was excised. No preoperative imaging was available. Review the high-quality, interactive digital Aperio slide at http://virtualacp.com/JCPCases/jclinpath-2019-206337/ and consider your diagnosis. 1. Epithelioid angiosarcoma (EAS). 2. Epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (eMPNST). 3. Malignant rhabdoid tumour (MRT). 4. Melanoma. 5. Proximal epithelioid sarcoma (ES). 6. Pseudomyogenic haemangioendothelioma (PH). The correct answer is after the Discussion. The diagnosis in this case is proximal ES. This was based on the following morphological features and immunohistochemistry. The sections show a cellular tumour composed of large polygonal cells with vesicular nuclei with prominent nucleoli and abundant eosinophilic granular cytoplasm (figure 1A). There are 8 mitoses per 10 high-power fields and focal necrosis. The tumour grows in sheets to form large nodules with a mild intratumoural lymphoid population and infiltrates into the surrounding fibroadipose tissue. The morphology and the immunohistochemistry findings are in keeping with proximal-variant epithelioid sarcoma (PES). The tumour shows strong and diffuse expression of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and CD34, with patchy expression of AE1/AE3 (figure 1B,C). There is also loss of nuclear expression of INI1 (figure 1D). There is no expression of MNF116, CAM5.2, S100 protein, CD30, CD31, FLI1, ERG, SOX10, HMB45, MelanA, desmin, smooth muscle actin (SMA), myogenin, CD45, PLAP or prostate-specific antigen. Figure 1 Scanned virtual slide (proximal-type ES). Proximal-type ES. (A) The tumour is composed of sheets and nests of relatively large and monomorphic epithelioid cells with vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli. (B,C) There is diffuse and strong expression of CD34 (B) and epithelial …

A man in his 30s presented with back pain and was found to have a tumour in the posterior chest wall. Imaging showed an expansile mass measuring up to 6.7 cm, centred on the left posterior 11th rib with diffuse cortical destruction. The tumour displaced the left hemidiaphragm, and was in contact with the spleen, with no infiltration seen. There was no involvement of the overlying skin. PET-CT showed the lesion to be inhomogeneously hypermetabolic, with a mainly peripheral distribution of FDG. Staging imaging showed no other abnormality. The patient was otherwise well with no medical history and no significant family history. A CT-guided biopsy was performed. Review the high-quality, interactive digital Aperio slide at http://virtualacp.com/JCPCases/jclinpath-2019-206338/ and consider your diagnosis. 1. Metastatic carcinoma. 2. Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS). 3. Sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma (SEF). 4. Spindle cell/sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma. 5. Osteosarcoma. 6. Ossifying fibromyxoid tumour (OFMT). This is a tumour composed of relatively uniform, minimally to mildly pleomorphic, medium-sized cells with round to ovoid nuclei and clear to lightly eosinophilic cytoplasm. The cells are present in groups, nests and occasionally individually, within densely fibrous stroma, with areas suspicious of osteoid formation. In this case the tumour is diffusely and strongly positive for MUC4 and CD99, and focally for CD57. This particular case is negative for AE1/AE3, Cam5.2, CK7, TTF1, desmin, smooth muscle actin (SMA), myogenin, FLI1, neuron-specific enolase, CD56, synaptophysin, chromogranin, glial fibrillary acidic protein, TLE1, CD45 and CD138. There is a normal staining pattern for p53, and INI expression is retained in nuclei. …

Background/aim To describe imaging features of head and neck soft-tissue sarcomas. Patients and methods Patients with a diagnosis of head and neck sarcoma between 2011 and 2015 were reviewed. Results There were a total of 62 patients (24 female; median age=60 years). Most common sarcomas were angiosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and sarcoma not otherwise specified. They were most commonly located in cranial and neck superficial soft tissues. Average tumour size at presentation was 45 mm. One patient had metastasis at presentation (rhabdomyosarcoma); two had nodal disease (rhabdomyosarcoma and angiosarcoma) and two tumours contained calcification (chondrosarcoma and synovial sarcoma). Four arose after prior radiotherapy. Conclusion Unlike the more common diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma, the majority of head and neck sarcomas present as large, solitary, superficial masses without lymph node enlargement. Identification of these features on imaging should raise suspicion of a sarcoma diagnosis, particularly in the setting of previous irradiation or genetic susceptibility.

Introduction: Liposarcomas (LPS) are a heterogeneous group of adipocytic soft tissue sarcomas with limited treatment options in the advanced/metastatic setting. Pazopanib is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with anti-angiogenic and antitumorigenic properties. Whilst targeted agents including TKIs have been extensively studied in other solid tumors and the sarcoma subtype gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), we currently lack effective treatments for the liposarcoma subtype. Several phase II and III studies of oral TKIs in soft tissue sarcomas have excluded liposarcoma because of a reported lack of activity following the EORTC 62043 study. Areas: We review the use of pazopanib in advanced intermediate and high-grade liposarcomas where complete surgical resection is not possible. Expert opinion: The current clinical and pharmacological data demonstrate the efficacy of pazopanib in soft tissue sarcomas, but new data suggest that anti-angiogenic agents may have limited activity in liposarcoma. Anti-angiogenic TKIs are generally well tolerated and liposarcomas vary in their response to systemic chemotherapy; hence, there is a role for further exploration of the efficacy of this treatment amongst the histological subtypes of liposarcoma. This affords further understanding of biomarkers which may be associated with response to pazopanib and other anti-angiogenic TKI treatments.

Aldoxorubicin is a prodrug formulation of doxorubicin currently under investigation for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. Early studies have demonstrated a promising reduction in the cardiotoxicity of aldoxorubicin compared with equivalent doses of doxorubicin leading to an increase in the equivalent cumulative dose of aldoxorubicin. The current clinical and pharmacological data available for aldoxorubicin are extremely promising for its use in the treatment of advanced and metastatic soft tissue sarcomas compared with equivalent doses of doxorubicin although Phase III data are lacking. We review aldoxorubicin for the treatment of advanced and metastatic soft tissue sarcomas and discuss the impact it may have in the future.

Aims Embryonal and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS, ARMS) are subtypes of RMS that mainly occur in children, with relatively good outcomes. The incidence in adults is extremely low and survival is significantly worse compared with children. Data are scarce and literature generally combines all RMS subtypes, including pleomorphic RMS, which primarily occurs in adults and behaves more like undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient and tumour characteristics, outcome and prognostic factors in adult patients with ERMS and ARMS. Materials and methods All adult (18 years or older) ERMS and ARMS patients (presenting 1990–2016) were identified from a prospectively maintained database and were included in this analysis. Results Overall, 66 patients were included (42 men, 24 women). The median age at presentation was 28 years (range 18–71). The median overall survival for all ARMS (n = 42) and ERMS (n = 24) patients was 18 months, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 27%. Patients presenting with localised disease (n = 38, 58%) and metastatic disease (n = 25, 42%), had a 5-year overall survival rate of 36% and 11%, respectively. In univariate analysis we found alveolar subtype, fusion gene positivity, infiltrative tumour and metastatic presentation to be negative prognostic factors. Conclusion Survival in adult ERMS and ARMS patients is poor and the current data may be useful in the design of trials with novel agents. Ideally, paediatric and adult oncologists should set up trials together to get a better understanding of biological, genetic and clinically relevant factors in this disease.

Contains fulltext : 203002.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) PURPOSE: Desmoid fibromatosis (DF) is a rare, unpredictable disease with no established, evidence-based treatments. Individual management is based on consensus algorithms. This study aimed to examine the specific health-related quality of life challenges faced by DF patients, current experiences and expectations of care. METHODS: Twenty-seven DF patients were purposively sampled from The Royal Marsden Hospital. Two focus groups and 13 interviews (males 12, females 15; mean age at study 39.5 years) explored health-related quality of life issues and experiences of healthcare. Thematic content was analysed. RESULTS: Discussions revealed four key themes (diagnostic pathway; treatment pathway; living with DF; supportive care). Diagnostic delay resulted from lack of recognition by patients and healthcare professionals. Some patients received an initial diagnosis of cancer, causing significant distress. Treatment decisions were challenging, and patients experienced uncertainty among clinicians about optimal therapies. Side-effects of treatment were severe, including fatigue, nausea, anorexia, low libido and depression. Pain was the most debilitating symptom and dependency on painkillers was a significant concern. Functional limitation and restricted mobility frequently affected daily activities. Patients experienced difficulty accomplishing their role in society; relationship problems, caring for children, employment and financial difficulties. Social isolation and lack of understanding were common. The psychological impact of this "life-changing and life-long" condition was profound. All patients requested knowledgeable healthcare professionals, more information, continuity of care and peer support. CONCLUSIONS: DF patients face complex physical, psychological and practical challenges. Comprehensive care services are needed. Increasing awareness may help to improve diagnostic pathways and overall patient experience.

Purpose: Perivascular epitheliod cell tumors (PEComas) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms for which the role of systemic treatments is not established as there are no published prospective clinical trials or sufficiently large retrospective case series. The aim of this study is to clarify the activity of conventional chemotherapy and biological agents in advanced/metastatic PEComas. Experimental Design: This was an observational, retrospective, international study that included patients with advanced/metastatic PEComa treated with systemic therapy at 5 European sarcoma reference centers and within the Italian Rare Cancer Network. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox hazards regression models. Results: A total of 53 patients were included. Cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens were active only in a small proportion of PEComas. Gemcitabine-based regimens [objective response rate (ORR): 20%, median progression-free survival (PFS): 3.4 months] seemed to have the same activity of anthracycline-based regimens (ORR: 13%, median PFS: 3.2 months). Antiangiogenic agents resulted in disease stabilization in some patients, with a number having density changes/tissue response on imaging, with an ORR of 8.3% and a median PFS of 5.4 months. mTOR inhibitors were the most active agents, with an ORR of 41% and a median PFS of 9 months. Conclusions: Our study provides data for the selection of systemic therapy in patients with advanced/metastatic PEComa: mTOR inhibitors are the most active agents. Antiangiogenics and chemotherapy with gemcitabine-based regimens or anthracycline-based regimens are options in further line, but with a lower response rate and PFS.

Poster-Abstract

Background: Brivanib is a selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling. We performed a phase II randomised discontinuation trial of brivanib in 7 tumour types (soft-tissue sarcomas [STS], ovarian cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC], gastric/esophageal cancer and transitional cell carcinoma [TCC]). Patients and methods: During a 12-week open-label lead-in period, patients received brivanib 800 mg daily and were evaluated for FGF2 status by immunohistochemistry. Patients with stable disease at week 12 were randomised to brivanib or placebo. A study steering committee evaluated week 12 response to determine if enrolment in a tumour type would continue. The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS) for brivanib versus placebo in patients with FGF2-positive tumours. Results: A total of 595 patients were treated, and stable disease was observed at the week 12 randomisation point in all tumour types. Closure decisions were made for breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, NSCLC, gastric cancer and TCC. Criteria for expansion were met for STS and ovarian cancer. In 53 randomised patients with STS and FGF2-positive tumours, the median PFS was 2.8 months for brivanib and 1.4 months for placebo (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.58, p = 0.08). For all randomised patients with sarcomas, the median PFS was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4–4.0) for those treated with brivanib compared with 1.4 months (95% CI: 1.3–1.6) for placebo (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.38–1.07; p = 0.09). In the 36 randomised patients with ovarian cancer and FGF2-positive tumours, the median PFS was 4.0 (95% CI: 2.6–4.2) months for brivanib and 2.0 months (95% CI: 1.2–2.7) for placebo (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.26–1.22). For all randomised patients with ovarian cancer, the median PFS in those randomised to brivanib was 4.0 months (95% CI: 2.6–4.2) and was 2.0 months (95% CI: 1.2–2.7) in those randomised to placebo (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.25–1.17; p = 0.11). Conclusion: Brivanib demonstrated activity in STS and ovarian cancer with an acceptable safety profile. FGF2 expression, as defined in the protocol, is not a predictive biomarker of the efficacy of brivanib., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

11517 Background: Doxorubicin (doxo) remains standard first-line therapy for advanced STS. Doxo in combination with olaratumab (O) demonstrated superior clinical activity compared to doxo alone in a Ph 2 trial (NCT01185964), although this was not confirmed in the subsequent Ph 3 trial (NCT02451943). Gemcitabine (G) plus docetaxel (D) is a second line therapy for advanced STS. Here, we report a concurrent Ph 2 study that explored a second-line addition of O to G and D for advanced STS (ANNOUNCE 2 NCT02659020). Methods: Adult patients (pts) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic STS, ≤ 2 prior lines of systemic therapy, and ECOG PS 0-1 were eligible. Pts were enrolled from 2 cohorts: O-naïve and O-pretreated. In both cohorts, pts were randomized 1:1 to either O, G plus D or placebo (PBO), G plus D. Pts received 21-day cycles of O (20 mg/ kg cycle 1 and 15 mg/kg other cycles, day (d) 1 and d8), G (900 mg/m2, d1 and d8) and D (75 mg/m2, d8). Pts continued treatment until progression, toxicity, or withdrawal. Randomization was stratified by histology (leiomyosarcoma [LMS] vs non-LMS), prior systemic therapy, ECOG PS, and prior pelvic radiation. The primary objective was overall survival (OS) in the O-naïve population using an alpha level of 0.20. Secondary endpoints included OS (O-pretreated) and other efficacy parameters, as well as safety and pharmacokinetics (PK). Results: 167 pts were enrolled in the O-naïve cohort and 89 pts in the O-pretreated cohort. Baseline patient characteristics were well balanced. OS for O-naïve pts was 16.8 vs 18.0 months (m) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.64-1.40; p = 0.78) for the investigational vs control arm, respectively. Other efficacy outcomes are presented in the table. Safety was manageable across treatment arms. PK parameter estimates for O were consistent with previous studies. Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in OS between the two arms in the O-naïve population. However, while not statistically significant, the combination of O, G and D demonstrated favorable OS in the O-pretreated cohort, and PFS and objective response rate (ORR) in both cohorts. For O-naïve pts, a clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) improvement was observed. Further investigations in specific histological subtypes are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02659020. [Table: see text]

11536 Background: Ripretinib is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor that broadly inhibits KIT and PDGFRA kinase signaling. In the INVICTUS study (NCT03353753), patients with advanced GIST (≥4th-line) receiving ripretinib had a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 6.3 months vs 1.0 month for patients receiving placebo (HR = 0.15, p

11563 Background: ES is a rare, aggressive subtype of STS for which cytotoxic chemotherapy has limited effectiveness. TAZ, an FDA-approved EZH2 inhibitor, has shown single-agent clinical activity and a favorable safety profile in patients with metastatic or locally advanced ES. In preclinical studies, TAZ has shown synergistic antitumor activity with DOX, which is often used as frontline treatment for STS. Here, we present results of the phase 1b study (NCT04204941), designed to assess the recommended phase 3 dose (RP3D), safety, and efficacy of TAZ + DOX in patients with advanced STS. Methods: The open-label, phase 1b portion of this study enrolled adult patients with previously untreated advanced STS. A standard 3 + 3 design was used to assess TAZ 400 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg orally twice daily in combination with DOX (75 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of each cycle, for up to 6 cycles) as frontline therapy. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were predefined in the protocol. The RP3D of TAZ was determined by Scientific Review Committee review of the safety and pharmacokinetic data from the phase 1b trial, with a target DLT rate of < 33%. Results: As of February 1, 2021, 16 patients are enrolled, including 2 with ES; 10 are still receiving TAZ + DOX and 6 have discontinued (5 due to disease progression, 1 due to patient withdrawal). The median age was 49.5 years (range, 29–82) and all had unresectable STS. Median (range) time on treatment was 13 (0.1–51.1+) weeks across all dose levels evaluated. Two DLTs, both of febrile neutropenia, were observed, one in the TAZ 600 mg + DOX cohort (n = 1/6, 17%), and one in the TAZ 800 mg + DOX cohort (n = 1/3, 33%). When used in combination with DOX, the RP3D of TAZ was 800 mg. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TR-TEAEs) occurred in 13/16 (81.3%) patients. The most common (≥ 20%) TR-TEAEs were neutropenia (n = 11, 69%), anemia (n = 10, 63%), fatigue (n = 10, 63%), stomatitis (n = 9, 56%), nausea (n = 8, 50%), febrile neutropenia (n = 7, 44%), constipation (n = 6, 38%), vomiting (n = 6, 38%), and decreased appetite (n = 5, 31%). TR-TEAEs were defined as attributable to either study agent. Conclusions: The combination of TAZ + DOX was generally well tolerated in this dose finding study in patients with advanced STS. The RP3D to be tested in the phase 3 randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study is TAZ 800 mg twice daily + DOX. The safety profile of this combination is consistent with the respective safety information for TAZ and for DOX. The TR-TEAEs include known toxicities of DOX or TAZ. Further comparison with DOX + placebo in the phase 3 trial will aid in assessing efficacy and safety of the combination of TAZ + DOX. The global phase 3 confirmatory trial will enroll patients with ES who have unresectable disease and have had no prior systemic therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04204941.

Author(s): Kohli, Karan; Yao, Lu; Nowicki, Theodore Scott; Zhang, Shihong; Black, Ralph Graeme; Schroeder, Brett A; Farrar, Erik A; Cao, Jianhong; Sloan, Heather; Stief, Dawn; Cranmer, Lee D; Wagner, Michael J; Hawkins, Douglas S; Pillarisetty, Venu G; Ribas, Antoni; Campbell, Jean; Pierce, Robert H; Kim, Edward Y; Jones, Robin L; Riddell, Stanley R; Yee, Cassian; Pollack, Seth M | Abstract: BackgroundSynovial sarcoma (SS) and myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCL) are ideal solid tumors for the development of adoptive cellular therapy (ACT) targeting NY-ESO-1, as a high frequency of tumors homogeneously express this cancer-testes antigen. Data from early phase clinical trials have shown antitumor activity after the adoptive transfer of NY-ESO-1-specific T cells. In these studies, persistence of NY-ESO-1 specific T cells is highly correlated with response to ACT, but patients often continue to have detectable transferred cells in their peripheral blood following progression.MethodWe performed a phase I clinical trial evaluating the safety of NY-ESO-1-specific endogenous T cells (ETC) following cyclophosphamide conditioning. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from treated patients were evaluated by flow cytometry and gene expression analysis as well as through ex vivo culture assays with and without IL-15.ResultsFour patients were treated in a cohort using ETC targeting NY-ESO-1 following cyclophosphamide conditioning. Treatment was well tolerated without significant toxicity, but all patients ultimately had disease progression. In two of four patients, we obtained post-treatment tumor tissue and in both, NY-ESO-1 antigen was retained despite clear detectable persisting NY-ESO-1-specific T cells in the peripheral blood. Despite a memory phenotype, these persisting cells lacked markers of proliferation or activation. However, in ex vivo culture assays, they could be induced to proliferate and kill tumor using IL-15. These results were also seen in PBMCs from two patients who received gene-engineered T-cell receptor-based products at other centers.ConclusionsETC targeting NY-ESO-1 with single-agent cyclophosphamide alone conditioning was well tolerated in patients with SS and those with MRCL. IL-15 can induce proliferation and activity in persisting NY-ESO-1-specific T cells even in patients with disease progression following ACT. These results support future work evaluating whether IL-15 could be incorporated into ACT trials post-infusion or at the time of progression.

Simple Summary In this position paper, we aim to summarize state-of-the-art treatments for patients with leiomyosarcomas in order to identify knowledge gaps and current unmet needs, thereby guiding the community to design innovative clinical trials and basic research and close these research gaps. This white paper arose from a leiomyosarcoma research meeting in October 2020 hosted by the National LeioMyoSarcoma Foundation (NLMSF) and Sarcoma Patients EuroNet (SPAEN). Abstract As leiomyosarcoma patients are challenged by the development of metastatic disease, effective systemic therapies are the cornerstone of outcome. However, the overall activity of the currently available conventional systemic treatments and the prognosis of patients with advanced or metastatic disease are still poor, making the treatment of this patient group challenging. Therefore, in a joint effort together with patient networks and organizations, namely Sarcoma Patients EuroNet (SPAEN), the international network of sarcoma patients organizations, and the National LeioMyoSarcoma Foundation (NLMSF) in the United States, we aim to summarize state-of-the-art treatments for leiomyosarcoma patients in order to identify knowledge gaps and current unmet needs, thereby guiding the community to design innovative clinical trials and basic research and close these research gaps. This position paper arose from a leiomyosarcoma research meeting in October 2020 hosted by the NLMSF and SPAEN.

Purpose This study explored relations between the negativity of children's speech-related attitudes as measured by the Communication Attitude Test for Preschool and Kindergarten Children Who Stutter (KiddyCAT; Vanryckeghem & Brutten, 2007) and (a) age; (b) caregiver reports of stuttering and its social consequences; (c) types of disfluencies; and (d) standardized speech, vocabulary, and language scores. Method Participants were 46 preschool-age children who stutter (CWS; 12 females, 34 males) and 66 preschool-age children who do not stutter (CWNS; 35 females, 31 males). After a conversation, children completed standardized tests and the KiddyCAT while their caregivers completed scales on observed stuttering behaviors and their consequences. Results The KiddyCAT scores of both the CWS and the CWNS were significantly negatively correlated with age. Both groups' KiddyCAT scores increased with higher scores on the Speech Fluency Rating Scale of the Test of Childhood Stuttering (Gillam, Logan, & Pearson, 2009). Repetitions were a significant contributor to the CWNS's KiddyCAT scores, but no specific disfluency significantly contributed to the CWS's KiddyCAT scores. Greater articulation errors were associated with higher KiddyCAT scores in the CWNS. No standardized test scores were associated with KiddyCAT scores in the CWS. Conclusion Attitudes that speech is difficult are not associated with similar aspects of communication for CWS and CWNS. Age significantly contributed to negative speech attitudes for CWS, whereas age, repetitions, and articulation errors contributed to negative speech attitudes for CWNS.

Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is an aggressive small round cell neoplasm which predominantly occurs intra-abdominally in adolescents and young adults with a male predominance, and which is characterized by a recurrent t(11;22)(p13;q12) translocation leading to formation of the EWSR1-WT1 fusion gene, which generates a chimeric protein with transcriptional regulatory activity. Histologically, DSRCT has a characteristic morphology, of islands of monotonous small cells within prominent sparsely cellular fibroblastic stroma, and immunohistochemically it shows polyphenotypic multidirectional differentiation, with expression of epithelial, muscle, and neural markers. However, DSRCT can arise more rarely in other sites and exhibit a spectrum of both histologic features and immunoprofile, which may confuse diagnosis with other small round cell neoplasms. Correct diagnosis is important to ensure correct treatment and prognostication; DSRCT are almost universally fatal neoplasms with patients usually succumbing to disease within the first 2 years of diagnosis. While combination treatment strategies can confer a survival benefit, the overall prognosis remains poor. Further insight into the tumorigenic molecular changes generated by the fusion oncogene may lead to the generation of specific targeted therapies. We review DSRCT, discussing morphology and immunohistochemistry, molecular genetic findings, potential targeted treatments, and the differential diagnosis.

Background: Soft tissue sarcomas are a group of neoplasms with differentiation towards mesenchymal tissue, many of which are aggressive and chemotherapy resistant. Histology and immunoprofiles often overlap with neoplasms of other lineages, and establishing an accurate histopathological diagnosis is crucial for correct management, and therapeutic stratification. The endosialin cell surface glycoprotein is predominantly expressed by stromal fibroblasts and pericytes in epithelial neoplasms; however, tumour cell expression has been reported in small series of sarcomas. Methods: We assessed endosialin expression by immunohistochemistry in a large set of 514 human soft tissue sarcomas. Results: Tumour cell endosialin expression was seen in 89% of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (104/117), 77% adult fibrosarcomas/spindle cell sarcomas (20/26), 62% synovial sarcomas (37/60), 51% leiomyosarcomas (94/185) and 31% rhabdomyosarcomas (39/126). Conclusions: Endosialin immunohistochemistry has potential to distinguish undifferentiated and poorly differentiated sarcomas from other poorly differentiated, non-mesenchymal neoplasms. A Phase II trial randomising patients with advanced sarcomas to receive chemotherapy with/without an endosialin therapeutic antibody has recently completed enrolment. Endosialin expression could be used to select patients for such clinical trials. Based on our results, patients with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma may be particularly suitable for such a therapeutic approach.

Summary Background Treatment with doxorubicin is a present standard of care for patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma and median overall survival for those treated is 12–16 months, but few, if any, novel treatments or chemotherapy combinations have been able to improve these poor outcomes. Olaratumab is a human antiplatelet-derived growth factor receptor α monoclonal antibody that has antitumour activity in human sarcoma xenografts. We aimed to assess the efficacy of olaratumab plus doxorubicin in patients with advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. Methods We did an open-label phase 1b and randomised phase 2 study of doxorubicin plus olaratumab treatment in patients with unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma at 16 clinical sites in the USA. For both the phase 1b and phase 2 parts of the study, eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma not previously treated with an anthracycline, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2, and available tumour tissue to determine PDGFRα expression by immunohistochemistry. In the phase 2 part of the study, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either olaratumab (15 mg/kg) intravenously on day 1 and day 8 plus doxorubicin (75 mg/m 2 ) or doxorubicin alone (75 mg/m 2 ) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for up to eight cycles. Randomisation was dynamic and used the minimisation randomisation technique. The phase 1b primary endpoint was safety and the phase 2 primary endpoint was progression-free survival using a two-sided α level of 0·2 and statistical power of 0·8. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01185964. Findings 15 patients were enrolled and treated with olaratumab plus doxorubicin in the phase 1b study, and 133 patients were randomised (66 to olaratumab plus doxorubicin; 67 to doxorubicin alone) in the phase 2 trial, 129 (97%) of whom received at least one dose of study treatment (64 received olaratumab plus doxorubicin, 65 received doxorubicin). Median progression-free survival in phase 2 was 6·6 months (95% CI 4·1–8·3) with olaratumab plus doxorubicin and 4·1 months (2·8–5·4) with doxorubicin (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·67; 0·44–1·02, p=0·0615). Median overall survival was 26·5 months (20·9–31·7) with olaratumab plus doxorubicin and 14·7 months (9·2–17·1) with doxorubicin (stratified HR 0·46, 0·30–0·71, p=0·0003). The objective response rate was 18·2% (9·8–29·6) with olaratumab plus doxorubicin and 11·9% (5·3–22·2) with doxorubicin (p=0·3421). Steady state olaratumab serum concentrations were reached during cycle 3 with mean maximum and trough concentrations ranging from 419 μg/mL (geometric coefficient of variation in percentage [CV%] 26·2) to 487 μg/mL (CV% 33·0) and from 123 μg/mL (CV% 31·2) to 156 μg/mL (CV% 38·0), respectively. Adverse events that were more frequent with olaratumab plus doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone included neutropenia (37 [58%] vs 23 [35%]), mucositis (34 [53%] vs 23 [35%]), nausea (47 [73%] vs 34 [52%]), vomiting (29 [45%] vs 12 [18%]), and diarrhoea (22 [34%] vs 15 [23%]). Febrile neutropenia of grade 3 or higher was similar in both groups (olaratumab plus doxorubicin: eight [13%] of 64 patients vs doxorubicin: nine [14%] of 65 patients). Interpretation This study of olaratumab with doxorubicin in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma met its predefined primary endpoint for progression-free survival and achieved a highly significant improvement of 11·8 months in median overall survival, suggesting a potential shift in the treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma. Funding Eli Lilly and Company.

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare mesenchymal cancers. Despite optimal management, nearly 50% of patients with localized disease will develop recurrence. The outcome for patients with metastatic STS is poor. There are few systemic treatment options available in this setting. Doxorubicin, with or without ifosfamide, is considered standard first line therapy. We herein review the evidence for the use of trabectedin in adult advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Some clinical trials have confirmed the activity of trabectedin as an effective and tolerable option for adult patients previously treated with doxorubicin and ifosfamide. Trabectedin was approved in the European Union and other countries based on the results of a randomized phase II trial involving patients with advanced liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma receiving one of two different schedules of trabectedin. Recently a multicentre phase III trial randomized liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma patients to receive either trabectedin or dacarbazine, demonstrating a significantly improved progression-free survival for patients treated with trabectedin compared to dacarbazine.

Well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDL) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDL) form the largest subgroup of liposarcomas, and represent a morphologic and behavioral spectrum of 1 disease entity, which arises typically in middle to late adult life, most frequently within the retroperitoneum or extremities. DDL is defined as nonlipogenic sarcoma that is juxtaposed to WDL, occurs as a recurrence of WDL or which can arise de novo, and typically has the appearance of undifferentiated pleomorphic or spindle cell sarcoma. DDL have a propensity for local recurrence, whereas distant metastasis is rarer, and behavior is related to anatomic site, with retroperitoneal neoplasms showing a significantly worse prognosis. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment, and medical options for patients with aggressive recurrent or metastatic disease are limited. DDL share similar genetic abnormalities to WDL, with high-level amplifications of chromosome 12q14-15, including the MDM2 and CDK4 cell cycle oncogenes, and DDL harbor additional genetic changes, particularly coamplifications of 6q23 and 1p32. Novel therapies targeted at the gene products of chromosome 12 are being tested in clinical trials. We review the pathology and genetics of DDL, discussing morphologic patterns, immunohistochemical and genetic findings, the differential diagnosis, and future therapeutic strategies.

Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is a rare, aggressive soft-tissue neoplasm of uncertain differentiation, characterized by nodular aggregates of epithelioid cells, which are immunoreactive to cytokeratins (CKs) and epithelial membrane antigen, and often for CD34. It has a propensity for multifocal disease at presentation, local recurrence, and regional metastasis. These are aggressive neoplasms with particularly poor prognosis after regional or distant metastatic disease, for which surgical resection is still the mainstay of treatment, and options for patients with metastatic disease remain undefined. There are 2 distinct variants: classic ES, which typically presents as a subcutaneous or deep dermal mass in the distal extremities of young adults and comprises nodular distributions of relatively uniform epithelioid cells with central necrosis, and the proximal variant, which has a predilection for proximal limbs and limb girdles and the midline of the trunk, which is composed of sheets of larger, more atypical cells with variable rhabdoid morphology. Both classic and proximal-type ESs are associated with the loss of SMARCB1/INI1 protein expression, but appear otherwise molecularly relatively heterogeneous. We review classic and proximal-type ES, discussing morphology, immunohistochemical and genetic findings, the differential diagnosis, and the future potential for targeted therapies.

Sarcomas are rare cancers with a spectrum of clinical needs and outcomes. We investigated care experiences and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in sarcoma patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients with appointments during the first two months of the UK lockdown were invited to complete a survey. Questions included views on care modifications, COVID-19 worry and psychosocial impact, and EORTC-QLQ-C30 items. 350 patients completed the survey, median age 58 (16&ndash, 92) years. Care modifications included telemedicine (74%) and postponement of appointments (34%), scans (34%) or treatment (10%). Most felt the quality of care was not affected (72%), however, social life (87%) and emotional wellbeing (41%) were affected. Worry about COVID-19 infection was moderately high (mean 5.8/10) and significantly related to higher cancer-related worry, associated with lower emotional functioning irrespective of treatment intent. Curative patients (44%) with low resilient coping scores had significantly higher COVID-19 worry. Patients who did not know their treatment intent (22%) had significantly higher COVID-19 worry and insomnia. In summary, care experiences were generally positive, however, cancer-related worry, low resilient coping and uncertainty about treatment intent were associated with COVID-19 worry. These patients may benefit from additional psychological support during the pandemic and beyond.

e23564 Background: Activity of temozolomide (TEM) and irinotecan (IRI) in recurrent Ewing sarcoma (EWS) was demonstrated. Few data are available on TEMIRI use upfront. Biological predictive factors are lacking. Methods: This multi-institutional retrospective study (NCT03542097) included 59 patients with EWS. 8 patients with very high risk (HR) EWS (multivisceral ± bone marrow) received TEMIRI (TEM 100 mg/m2/day oral, and IRI 40 mg/m2/day intravenous, days 1-5, every 21 days) upfront, 51 patients after relapse (28% in 1st line, 72% ≥ 2nd line). Overall response rate (ORR: CR+PR), SD, and PD, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. The relationship between pre-treatment expression of MGMT and ABCG2 (when FFPE tissue available) with ORR, PFS and OS was evaluated. Results: Median age was 27 years (range 4-62 years): 47 patients (80%) were adults (≥18 years), 35 (61%) had ECOG 0 and 42 (71%) presented with multivisceral disease (+ bone marrow in 5). MGMT was positive in 16/30 (53%), ABCG2 in 4/33 (12%). ORR for upfront TEMIRI (n = 8) was 50% (CR + PR = 1 + 3), with SD 50%, while in recurrent EWS (n = 49, 2 patients no measurable by RECIST) ORR was 31% (CR + PR = 4 + 11), SD 38%, and PD 31%. A better ORR was observed in adult (p = 0.008) & ECOG 0 (p = 0.001) patients; MGMT & ABCG2 expression did not influence ORR. 6-mos PFS was 87% after TEMIRI upfront, 43% at recurrence (p = 0.06), and 65% vs 28% (p = 0.02) for ECOG 0 vs ECOG 1-2, respectively. 6-mos PFS was 62% in MGMT+ vs 33% in MGMT- (p = 0.4) and 75% in ABCG2+ vs 50% in ABCG2- (p = 0.7). Median time to progression (TTP) with upfront TEMIRI was 9 months (range 5-28 months), with 1 patient with ongoing CR at 56 months; median TTP at relapse was 3 months (1-29 months). MGMT and ABCG2 expression did not influence 1-yr OS, whereas ECOG (0 vs 1-2) did (88% vs 31% p < 0.001). Grade 3-4 diarrhea, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia incidence was < 5%, 1 patient with recurrent kidney EWS died of acute liver failure. Conclusions: TEMIRI showed promising activity in a very unfavorable cohort of EWS patients, with manageable toxicity. Performance status correlated with 6-month PFS & OS whereas MGMT & ABCG2 did not. Clinical trial information: NCT03542097 .

11564 Background: Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is a rare, aggressive soft tissue sarcoma characterized by loss of inhibitor of integrase 1 (INI1), allowing enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) to repress cell differentiation and promote tumorigenesis. Tazemetostat (TAZ) is a selective inhibitor of EZH2 approved by the FDA for treatment of patients (pts) aged ≥16 years with metastatic or locally advanced ES ineligible for complete resection. Methods: This open-label, multicenter, multi-cohort phase 2 study (NCT02601950) evaluated safety and efficacy of TAZ in pts with INI1-negative tumors. ES pts were enrolled in Cohorts 5 and 6; pts in Cohort 6 underwent mandatory pre-dose (at screening) and post-dose biopsies (at Day 1 of cycle 2). Herein, we report the interim efficacy and safety data from Cohort 6. Results: As of July 31 2019, 44 pts were enrolled into Cohort 6 and treated with TAZ 800 mg BID. The objective response rate (ORR) was 11.4%; 4 pts (9.1%) had a partial response and 1 pt (2.3%) had a complete response (Table). Another 17 pts (38.6%) had stable disease (SD). 18 pts had progressive disease; 13 of these pts remained on study beyond progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 56 weeks were 19.4% and 59.4%, respectively. In a pooled posthoc analysis of 106 ES pts from Cohorts 5 (n = 62), and 6, ORR was 13.2%. Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 16 pts (36.4%), most commonly anemia (6.8%; n = 3) and tumor pain (6.8%; n = 3). 3 pts (6.8%) experienced grade 3–4 treatment-related AEs. One pt discontinued study drug and there were no treatment-emergent dose reductions or treatment-related deaths. These safety data from Cohort 6 are consistent with previously reported data from Cohort 5. 19 paired biopsies were included for translational endpoint analyses. Preliminary RNA seq and pathway analyses are currently ongoing and updated data, including additional biomarker data will be presented. Conclusions: Consistent with previously reported data from the completed Cohort 5, TAZ demonstrated clinically meaningful, durable, single agent activity in ES pts. Efficacy data from Cohort 6 continue to mature with 8 patients still on treatment. TAZ was well tolerated with a low incidence of treatment related AEs. Clinical trial information: NCT02601950 . [Table: see text]

e16643 Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations (mIDH1) are present in a variety of solid tumors resulting in production and accumulation of (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate causing DNA hypermethylation and promoting tumorigenesis. Olutasidenib is an oral, potent and selective inhibitor of mutated IDH1 protein. We report preliminary results from the ongoing, first-in-human, Phase 1, open-label, single-arm study of olutasidenib in non-CNS solid tumors. Methods: Patients with advanced relapsed/refractory (R/R) mIDH1 solid tumors received olutasidenib 150 mg BID, orally. Following a dose confirmation cohort (Phase 1b), patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC), chondrosarcoma (CS), or unspecified mIDH1 solid tumors (Other) were enrolled in a Phase 2 efficacy evaluation (NCT: 03684811). Results: As of 31-Oct-2019, 44 patients with relapsed or refractory mIDH1 solid tumors were treated with olutasidenib. Diagnosis included: IHCC (n = 26), CS (n = 13), and Other (n = 5). The median age was 58 years (range: 29-81) and 43% were male. Median number of prior treatments was 2 (1-10). mIDH1 status was locally determined (IHC, NGS or PCR): R132C (61%), R132G (7%), R132S (7%), R132H (2%), R132L (2%), Others (2%) & unspecified (18%). Fourteen patients discontinued treatment (disease progression [n = 6; 3 IHCC, 2 CS, 1 Other], AE [n = 4; 3 IHCC, 1 CS], PI decision [n = 3; IHCC] & withdraw consent [n = 1; IHCC]). Treatment emergent adverse events (all grades, regardless of attribution) that occurred in > 15% of pts were: nausea (43%), fatigue (25%), decreased appetite (22%), AST increase (18%), ALT increase (16%), and constipation (16%). No protocol-defined DLTs occurred. Best responses by tumor type are shown in the table. Conclusions: Single agent olutasidenib at 150 mg BID demonstrates acceptable safety and tolerability with preliminary clinical activity in patients with R/R mIDH1 solid tumors. Updated safety and clinical activity, as well as exploratory evaluations of PK/PD will be provided. Clinical trial information: 03684811 . [Table: see text]

11535 Background: Ripretinib is a novel switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that broadly inhibits KIT and PDGFRA kinase signaling through a dual mechanism of action. In INVICTUS (NCT03353753), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ripretinib in ≥4th-line advanced GIST, ripretinib reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 85% vs placebo and had a favorable overall safety profile in patients previously treated with ≥3 prior TKIs. Methods: As part of the INVICTUS trial, patient reported outcome (PRO) measures were collected using EQ-5D-5L (EQ5D) and EORTC QLQ-C30 (C30). In prespecified and additional analyses, ANCOVA models were built to compare changes from baseline to cycle 2 day 1 (C2D1) for PRO measures within the ripretinib and placebo arms and determine the difference between treatment arms. PRO measures included the EQ5D visual analogue scale (VAS) and the C30 physical functioning (PF) and role functioning (RF) scales (all scores range from 0–100; higher scores are better). The C30 overall health and overall QoL questions were also assessed (scores range from 1–7; higher scores are better). Fixed effects included treatment arm, number of previous anticancer treatments (3 vs ≥4), and ECOG score at baseline (0 vs 1/2). Results: Overall, 129 patients were randomized and 128 received treatment (85 to ripretinib 150 mg QD; 43 to placebo). All PRO p-values are nominal, and no statistical significance is being claimed. VAS scores improved an average 3.7 points from baseline to C2D1 with ripretinib vs an average decline of 8.9 with placebo (P = 0.004; improvement or no change, 67% vs 41% of patients, respectively). Similarly, the average PF score improved 1.6 points with ripretinib and decreased 8.9 with placebo (P = 0.004; improvement or no change, 68% vs 44%). RF scores also improved an average of 3.5 points with ripretinib vs a decrease of 17.1 with placebo (P = 0.001; improvement or no change, 77% vs 50%). For the overall health and overall QoL questions, scores increased with ripretinib an average of 0.20 and 0.28, respectively, and decreased 0.78 and 0.76 with placebo (both P = 0.001; improvement or no change, 74% vs 47% and 79% vs 59%, respectively). Conclusions: Based on the 5 PRO measures assessed, when compared with placebo and best supportive care, ripretinib provided patient-benefit in advanced GIST with PRO measures of role and physical function, VAS, overall health, and overall QoL remaining stable. Clinical trial information: NCT03353753 .

826 Background: Targeting oncogenic KIT and PDGFRA mutations revolutionized treatment of patients (pts) with advanced GIST; however, nearly all pts succumb to resistant disease. Avapritinib is a potent and selective kinase inhibitor with broad activity against oncogenic KIT/PDGFRA mutants, including PDGFRA D842V and other primary or secondary resistance mutations. Results from the phase 1 NAVIGATOR (NCT02508532) study of avapritinib in pts with advanced GIST are presented. Methods: Adult pts with unresectable PDGFRA D842V or other mutant GIST who progressed on imatinib and ≥1 other tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) were treated with oral, daily, continuous avapritinib. Adverse events (AE) and response by mRECIST 1.1 per central radiology were assessed. Overall population safety (30-600 mg starting doses) and efficacy in the response-evaluable 4L+ and PDGFRA Exon 18 (Ex 18) populations treated at the MTD (400 mg)/RP2D (300 mg) were analyzed. Results: As of 16 Nov 2018, 237 pts [172 KIT, 62 PDGFRA Ex 18 [56 D842V, 6 non-D842V), 2 PDGFRA N659K, 1 missing] were enrolled including 111 in the 4L+ population (primarily KIT, median 4 prior TKI) and 43 in the Ex 18 population (median 1 prior TKI). The 4L+ ORR was 22% [1 CR, 23 PR (1 pending)], and 52 SD with mDOR of 10.2 months (95% CI: 7.2–NE). The Ex 18 ORR was 86% [3 CR, 34 PR (1 pending)] and 5 SD; mDOR was not reached (95% CI: 11.3–NE). Most AEs were grade 1–2, most commonly nausea (63%), fatigue (58%), anemia (49%), periorbital edema (42%), diarrhea (40%), vomiting (40%), decreased appetite (38%), increased lacrimation (33%), peripheral edema (33%) and memory impairment (most common cognitive AE, 29%). 10% of pts discontinued due to a related AE. Grade 3–4 related AE ≥ 2% were anemia, fatigue, hypophosphatemia, hyperbilirubinemia, neutropenia, and diarrhea. Conclusions: Avapritinib has important clinical activity in pts with advanced GIST who have no effective therapies. The ORR and DOR of avapritinib in 4L+ exceeds that of approved 2nd and 3rd line therapies and shows impressive activity in D842V and other Ex 18 mutant PDGFRA GIST. Results suggest avapritinib has the potential to change the treatment paradigm of pts with advanced GIST. Clinical trial information: NCT02508532.

BACKGROUND: More than half of patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are aged ≥65 years (older), however contemporary data on the efficacy/safety of anthracycline chemotherapy in older patients with STS are lacking. METHODS: SARC021 randomized patients to receive first-line doxorubicin or doxorubicin plus evofosfamide. The main aim of this study was to compare the outcome and safety of first-line anthracycline-based therapy in older patients compared with those

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is an aggressive malignancy which accounts for approximately 5–10% of all soft-tissue sarcomas. SS has pathologic and genomic characteristics that define it as a distinct subtype of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). STS subtypes continue to be recognized as distinct entities with specific characteristics, including differential chemo-sensitivity. The objective of this study was to conduct a descriptive review of current data on survival outcomes of systemic anti-cancer therapy specific to SS. A systematic literature review was conducted, using a custom search strategy to search EMBASE, Medline and CENTRAL for clinical trials and observational studies reporting overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and/or response for cohorts of at least 50 SS patients. We identified 28 studies meeting these criteria, 25 of which were retrospective studies. Only three prospective studies were identified. Survival reports varied widely between studies based on the population, in particular on the disease stage, and reporting was heterogeneous in terms of the time points reported on. For patients with localized disease, reports of five-year PFS ranged from 26% to 80.7% and five-year OS from 40% to 90.7%, whereas five-year OS for patients with metastatic disease was very low at around 10%; and in one case, 0% was reported. Only four of the included publications reported outcomes by type of systemic anti-cancer therapy received. Our study draws attention to the fact that additional prospective studies to better define the most appropriate treatment for SS in all stages and lines of therapy are still needed.