Search

Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare patient comfort between MR-guided in-bore prostate biopsy (IB-GB) and MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy (FUS-GB) with additional systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy within a prospective randomized trial., Methods: Two hundred and ten consecutive patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IB-GB and prior intrarectal instillation of a 2% lidocaine gel (n = 106) or FUS-GB plus additional systematic 12-core TRUS-guided biopsy and prior application of a periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) with 2% mepivacaine (n = 104). The maximal procedural pain (MPP) on a 0-10 visual analog scale and the operating room time were recorded for each biopsy session., Results: Baseline characteristics and mean number of targeted biopsy cores (5.6 ± 0.8 vs 5.4 ± 1.2 for IB-GB and FUS-GB, respectively; p = 0.278) were similar in both study arms. In relation to the IB-GB arm, the total number of biopsy cores in the FUS-GB arm, including the systematic 12-core TRUS-guided biopsy, was significantly higher (17.4 ± 1.2; p < 0.001). Patients with IB-GB had significantly higher MPP scores (2.95 ± 2.15) compared with subjects with FUS-GB (1.95 ± 1.56; p < 0.001). FUS-GB required significantly less time (28.22 ± 11.61 min) in comparison with IB-GB (42.09 ± 11.37 min; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The PPNB can easily be administered just prior to performing FUS-GB. Thus, patients have significantly lower pain levels in comparison with IB-GB, which is usually done with intrarectal anesthetic gels. Although the addition of a systematic 12-core TRUS-guided biopsy significantly increases the number of biopsy cores, FUS-GB still requires significantly less time in comparison with IB-GB.

Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate transrectal MRI-guided in-bore biopsy in patients who either were biopsy-naive (primary biopsy) or had undergone at least one previous negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (secondary biopsy) with regard to cancer detection rate, tumor localization, and lesion size., Materials and Methods: In total, 1602 biopsy cores from 297 consecutive patients (mean ± SD, 66.1 ± 7.8 years; median prostate-specific antigen value, 8.2 ng/mL) in primary (n = 160) and secondary (n = 137) prostate biopsy settings were evaluated in this retrospective study. All patients previously underwent prostate MRI (T2-weighted imaging, DWI, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging) at 3 T. All described lesions were biopsied with MRI-guided in-bore biopsy and were examined histologically., Results: In 148 patients, overall 511 cores were positive for prostate cancer. Clinically significant prostate cancer (any Gleason pattern ≥ 4) was found in 82.4% of patients. The prostate cancer detection rate for patients who underwent primary biopsies was 55.6% and was 43.1% for patients who underwent secondary biopsies. In patients with primary versus secondary biopsies, prostate cancer was located peripherally in 62.9% versus 49.5% (p = 0.04), in the transition zone in 27.4% versus 27.5% (p = 1.0), and in the anterior stroma in 10.3% versus 22.9% (p < 0.01), respectively. The prostate cancer detection rates for patients with smaller prostate volumes (< 30 vs 30-50 vs > 50 mL; p < 0.01) or for patients with larger lesions (> 0.5 vs 0.25-0.5 vs < 0.25 cm(3); p < 0.01) were significantly higher., Conclusion: MRI-guided in-bore biopsy led to high detection rates in primary and secondary prostate biopsies. Prostate cancer detection rates were significantly higher for patients with larger lesions and smaller prostate glands. In patients who underwent secondary biopsies, prostate cancer was located in the anterior stroma at a significantly more frequent rate.

Purpose: Gleason grading is the strongest predictor of prostate cancer outcome and commonly used to decide for or against the different treatment options. However, Gleason upgrading between systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-GB) and radical prostatectomy (RPE) has frequently been observed. With respect to the high accuracy of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for high-grade cancers and the higher percentage of cancer involvement per biopsy core in targeted MR-guided prostate biopsy (MR-GB), we hypothesized that MR-GB reduces the risk of Gleason upgrading on RPE as compared to the gold standard. The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of Gleason upgrading on RPE for MR-GB, TRUS-GB, and the combination of both biopsy modalities., Methods: Overall, 52 consecutive patients with RPE had received an mpMRI of the prostate and subsequently underwent targeted MR-GB prior to surgery. All patients underwent an additional TRUS-GB during the same biopsy session. Gleason grading was measured by two different methods: the conventional Gleason score (cGS = primary + secondary pattern) and the highest Gleason pattern (hGP)., Results: In relation to TRUS-GB, MR-GB alone showed lower rates of upgrading when comparing the cGS (40.4 vs. 50.0 %) and the hGP (21.2 vs. 32.7 %). The combination of MR-GB and TRUS-GB showed the lowest rates of upgrading (cGS: 28.8 %; hGP: 11.5 %), and compared to TRUS-GB, significantly reduced the risk of upgrading for both measurements of Gleason grading (cGS: OR 0.41, 95 % CL 0.18-0.91, p = 0.0289; hGP: OR 0.27, 95 % CL 0.10-0.75, p = 0.0123)., Conclusion: MpMRI and targeted MR-GB are useful tools to better characterize and stage the extent of disease, and therefore enable the urologist to better risk-stratify and counsel the patient. The combined use of targeted MR-GB and TRUS-GB presents the least risk of Gleason underestimation.

Background: A significant proportion of prostate cancers (PCas) are missed by conventional transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-GB). It remains unclear whether the combined approach using targeted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy (FUS-GB) and systematic TRUS-GB is superior to targeted MRI-guided in-bore biopsy (IB-GB) for PCa detection., Objective: To compare PCa detection between IB-GB alone and FUS-GB + TRUS-GB in patients with at least one negative TRUS-GB and prostate-specific antigen ≥4 ng/ml., Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients were prospectively randomized after multiparametric prostate MRI to IB-GB (arm A) or FUS-GB + TRUS-GB (arm B) from November 2011 to July 2014., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: The study was powered at 80% to demonstrate an overall PCa detection rate of ≥60% in arm B compared to 40% in arm A. Secondary endpoints were the distribution of highest Gleason scores, the rate of detection of significant PCa (Gleason ≥7), the number of biopsy cores to detect one (significant) PCa, the positivity rate for biopsy cores, and tumor involvement per biopsy core., Results and Limitations: The study was halted after interim analysis because the primary endpoint was not met. The trial enrolled 267 patients, of whom 210 were analyzed (106 randomized to arm A and 104 to arm B). PCa detection was 37% in arm A and 39% in arm B (95% confidence interval for difference, -16% to 11%; p=0.7). Detection rates for significant PCa (29% vs 32%; p=0.7) and the highest percentage tumor involvement per biopsy core (48% vs 42%; p=0.4) were similar between the arms. The mean number of cores was 5.6 versus 17 (p<0.001). A limitation is the limited number of patients because of early cessation of accrual., Conclusions: This trial failed to identify an important improvement in detection rate for the combined biopsy approach over MRI-targeted biopsy alone. A prospective comparison between MRI-targeted biopsy alone and systematic TRUS-GB is justified., Patient Summary: Our randomized study showed similar prostate cancer detection rates between targeted prostate biopsy guided by magnetic resonance imaging and the combination of targeted biopsy and systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. An important improvement in detection rates using the combined biopsy approach can be excluded., (Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy is increasingly performed to diagnose prostate cancer. However, there is a lack of well controlled, prospective trials to support this treatment method. We prospectively compared magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore biopsy with standard systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in biopsy naïve men with increased prostate specific antigen., Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective study in 132 biopsy naïve men with increased prostate specific antigen (greater than 4 ng/ml). After 3 Tesla functional multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging patients were referred for magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore biopsy of prostate lesions (maximum 3) followed by standard systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (12 cores). We analyzed the detection rates of prostate cancer and significant prostate cancer (greater than 5 mm total cancer length or any Gleason pattern greater than 3)., Results: A total of 128 patients with a mean ± SD age of 66.1 ± 8.1 years met all study requirements. Median prostate specific antigen was 6.7 ng/ml (IQR 5.1-9.0). Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsies provided the same 53.1% detection rate, including 79.4% and 85.3%, respectively, for significant prostate cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies missed 7.8% and 9.4% of clinically significant prostate cancers, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging biopsy required significantly fewer cores and revealed a higher percent of cancer involvement per biopsy core (each p <0.01). Combining the 2 methods provided a 60.9% detection rate with an 82.1% rate for significant prostate cancer., Conclusions: Magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore and systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies achieved equally high detection rates in biopsy naïve patients with increased prostate specific antigen. Magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore biopsies required significantly fewer cores and revealed a significantly higher percent of cancer involvement per biopsy core., (Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study evaluated the accuracy of MR sequences [T2-, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (T2WI, DWI, and DCE) imaging] at 3T, based on the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) scoring system [Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS)] using MR-guided in-bore prostate biopsies as reference standard., Methods: In 235 consecutive patients [aged 65.7 ± 7.9 years; median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 8 ng/ml] with multiparametric prostate MRI (mp-MRI), 566 lesions were scored according to PI-RADS. Histology of all lesions was obtained by targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy., Results: In 200 lesions, biopsy revealed prostate cancer (PCa). The area under the curve (AUC) for cancer detection was 0.70 (T2WI), 0.80 (DWI), and 0.74 (DCE). A combination of T2WI + DWI, T2WI + DCE, and DWI + DCE achieved an AUC of 0.81, 0.78, and 0.79. A summed PI-RADS score of T2WI + DWI + DCE achieved an AUC of 0.81. For higher grade PCa (primary Gleason pattern ≥ 4), the AUC was 0.85 for T2WI + DWI, 0.84 for T2WI + DCE, 0.86 for DWI + DCE, and 0.87 for T2WI + DWI + DCE. The AUC for T2WI + DWI + DCE for transitional-zone PCa was 0.73, and for the peripheral zone 0.88. Regarding higher-grade PCa, AUC for transitional-zone PCa was 0.88, and for peripheral zone 0.96., Conclusion: The combination of T2WI + DWI + DCE achieved the highest test accuracy, especially in patients with higher-grade PCa. The use of ≤2 MR sequences led to lower AUC in higher-grade and peripheral-zone cancers., Key Points: • T2WI + DWI + DCE achieved the highest accuracy in patients with higher grade PCa • T2WI + DWI + DCE was more accurate for peripheral- than for transitional-zone PCa • DCE increased PCa detection accuracy in the peripheral zone • DWI was the leading sequence in the transitional zone.

Purpose: The present study evaluates the combination of a high iodine delivery rate with a low tube current-time product for pulmonary computed tomography angiography (CTA)., Materials and Methods: One-hundred nineteen consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary CTA for suspected pulmonary embolism were included and imaged on a 128-row computed tomography scanner at 100 kVp using highly concentrated contrast material (85 mL Iomeprol; 400 mg iodine/mL). The protocol entailed a flow rate of 5 mL/s and 90 mAs for group A, 3.5 mL/s and 135 mAs for group B, 5 mL/s and 135 mAs for group C, and 3.5 mL/s and 90 mAs for group D. Signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were determined for the pulmonary artery. Subjective image quality (IQ) was rated on a 5-point scale (1=nondiagnostic IQ to 5=excellent IQ)., Results: CNR did not differ significantly between groups A (43.7±27.7), B (34.5±17.9), and C (38.9±13.8), as well as between groups B and D (29.9±11.2). CNR was higher in groups A and C than in group D (P<0.02). Subjective IQ was higher in group A than in groups B and D (P<0.05). Subjective IQ was significantly higher in group A compared with group D (P=0.026) and in group C compared with group D (P=0.007)., Conclusions: A high iodine delivery rate permits dose reduction in pulmonary CTA and can be recommended in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Background: Organ-specific dose reduction significantly reduces the radiation exposure of radiosensitive organs., Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a novel organ-specific dose reduction algorithm on image quality of pediatric chest CT., Materials and Methods: We included 28 children (mean age 10.9 ± 4.8 years, range 3-18 years) who had contrast-enhanced chest CT on a 128-row scanner. CT was performed at 100 kV using automated tube current modulation and a novel organ-specific dose-reduction algorithm (XCare™; Siemens, Forchheim, Germany). Seven children had a previous chest CT performed on a 64-row scanner at 100 kV without organ-specific dose reduction. Subjective image quality was assessed using a five-point scale (1-not diagnostic; 5-excellent). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were assessed in the descending aorta., Results: Overall mean subjective image quality was 4.1 ± 0.6. In the subgroup of the seven children examined both with and without organ-specific dose reduction, subjective image quality was comparable (score 4.4 ± 0.5 with organ-specific dose reduction vs. 4.4 ± 0.7 without it; P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in mean signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio with organ-specific dose reduction (38.3 ± 10.1 and 28.5 ± 8.7, respectively) and without the reduction (35.5 ± 8.5 and 26.5 ± 7.8, respectively) (P > 0.05). Volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and size-specific dose estimates did not differ significantly between acquisitions with the organ-specific dose reduction (1.7 ± 0.8 mGy) and without the reduction (1.7 ± 0.8 mGy) (P > 0.05)., Conclusion: Organ-specific dose reduction does not have an impact on image quality of pediatric chest CT and can therefore be used in clinical practice to reduce radiation dose of radiosensitive organs such as breast and thyroid gland.

Purpose: To assess the feasibility of full diffusional kurtosis tensor imaging (DKI) in prostate MRI in clinical routine. Histopathological correlation was achieved by targeted biopsy., Materials and Methods: Thirty-one men were prospectively included in the study. Twenty-one were referred to our hospital with increased prostate specific antigen (PSA) values (>4ng/ml) and suspicion of prostate cancer. The other 10 men were volunteers without any history of prostate disease. DKI applying diffusion gradients in 20 different spatial directions with four b-values (0, 300, 600, 1000s/mm(2)) was performed additionally to standard functional prostate MRI. Region of interest (ROI)-based measurements were performed in all histopathologically verified lesions of every patient, as well as in the peripheral zone, and the central gland of each volunteer., Results: DKI showed a substantially better fit to the diffusion-weighted signal than the monoexponential apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Altogether, 29 lesions were biopsied in 14 different patients with the following results: Gleason score 3+3=6 (n=1), 3+4=7 (n=7), 4+3=7 (n=6), 4+4=8 (n=1), and 4+5=9 (n=2), and prostatitis (n=12). Values of axial (Kax) and mean kurtosis (Kmean) were significantly different in the tumor (Kax 1.78±0.39, Kmean 1.84±0.43) compared with the normal peripheral zone (Kax 1.09±0.12, Kmean 1.16±0.13; p<0.001) or the central gland (Kax 1.40±0.12, Kmean 1.44±0.17; p=0.01 respectively). There was a minor correlation between axial kurtosis (r=0.19) and the Gleason score., Conclusion: Full DKI is feasible to utilize in a routine clinical setting. Although there is some overlap some DKI parameters can significantly distinguish prostate cancer from the central gland or the normal peripheral zone. Nevertheless, the additional value of DKI compared with conventional monoexponential ADC calculation remains questionable and requires further research., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Initial inaccurate staging is a common problem associated with active surveillance (AS) for patients detected by transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-GB). Subsequently, repeated biopsies are necessary to monitor such patients. Thus, in addition to the already established clinicopathological criteria, there is a considerable demand for new, objective decision criteria to more accurately select AS candidates. Recently, a novel RNA expression signature derived from 31 cell-cycle progression (CCP) genes has been shown to be a strong predictor of outcome in patients after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. This is a qualitative pilot study to evaluate the prognostic value of the CCP-score (CCP-S) for the first time in men managed with AS after MRI-guided prostate biopsy (MRI-GB)., Patients and Methods: Nine patients previously diagnosed with prostate cancer during an ongoing, prospective trial assessing MRI-GB with additional TRUS-GB and were subsequently managed with AS. CCP-S were retrospectively derived from biopsy specimens. The CCP-S is defined as the expression level of 31 CCP genes, normalized to 15 housekeeping genes, and is clinically validated in a range between -1.3 and 4.7. To assess the estimated 10-year mortality risk (without curative treatment), the CCP-S from each patient was combined with the individual CAPRA (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment) score (CAPRA-S)., Results: Median patient age was 72 (range=58-77) years. Mean pre-biopsy PSA level was 6.33±1.94 (range 4.23-9.97) ng/ml. Eight cases had Gleason score 6 (3+3) and one cancer had Gleason score 7 (3+4). Median CCP-S was -0.9 (range=-1.5 to 0.0). Combining CCP-S with CAPRA-S [CAPRA-S: 1 (n=4), 2 (n=4), 3 (n=1)] the estimated 10-year mortality risk was not calculable for three patients because their CCP-S [CCP-S -1.4 (n=2) and -1.5 (n=1)] was outside the validated range. For the other 6 patients the estimated 10-year mortality ranged from 1.0-3.0%., Conclusion: The CCP-S confirms accurate staging of AS patients detected by MRI-based biopsy strategies and may significantly reduce inaccurate staging of AS patients and subsequent unnecessary re-biopsies. The CCP score may help to more accurately select for active surveillance candidates.

Objectives: The evaluation of lesions detected in prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with increased signal intensity (SI) on high b-value diffusion-weighted images as a sign of malignancy., Methods: One hundred and three consecutive patients with prostate MRI examination and MRI-guided in-bore biopsy were retrospectively included in the study. MRI-guided in-bore biopsy histologically confirmed prostate cancer in 50 patients (n = 92 lesions). The other 53 patients (n = 122 lesions) had negative bioptical results., Results: In patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer, 46 of the 92 lesions had visually increased SI on the high b-value images compared with the peripheral zone (SI = +27 ± 16%) or the central gland (SI = +37 ± 19%, P < 0.001 respectively). In patients with a negative biopsy, ten of the 122 lesions had visually increased SI (compared with the peripheral zone, SI = +29 ± 18%, and with the central gland, SI = +41 ± 15%, P < 0.001 respectively). Neither the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values nor the Gleason Score of lesions with increased SI were significantly different from lesions without increased SI., Conclusions: Visually increased SI on the high b-value images of diffusion-weighted imaging using standard b-values is a sign of malignancy but can occasionally also be a feature of benign lesions. However, it does not indicate more aggressive tumours., Key Points: • Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used to diagnose prostatic cancer • Reduced signal intensity (SI) on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping is characteristic • Prostatic tumours usually exhibit increased SI on high b-value images • But benign lesions can also yield increased SI on high b-value images.

Background: To estimate potential malignant lesions within the prostate gland, the usage of a scoring system has recently been proposed by a European consensus meeting., Purpose: To prospectively investigate a scoring system for functional prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using in-bore MR-guided prostate biopsy at 3-T., Material and Methods: Prostate MRI examinations of 59 patients (between February 2011 and May 2012) with no known prostate cancer, elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, and unsuspicious digital rectal examination were included in the study. In each patient up to three lesions were defined and scored using a 5-point scoring system for each MR sequence (T2-weighted images, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging). Following MRI-guided in-bore biopsy these lesions were correlated to the histopathological findings., Results: A total number of 144 lesions were defined in 59 patients. In 28 patients (51 lesions) MR-guided in-bore biopsy was positive for tumor (Gleason grade 6 or higher). A cut-off limit of 10 or more points in summation of the individual scores of all three sequences was used, leading to a 90% sensitivity, 63% specificity, 58% positive predictive value, and 92% negative predictive value., Conclusion: A simple 5-point scoring system of functional prostate MRI achieves excellent sensitivity and moderate specificity for directing 3-T-guided prostate biopsy relative to the histopathological findings.