Search

Cardiogenic shock is a clinical syndrome of impaired tissue perfusion caused by primary cardiac dysfunction and inadequate cardiac output. It represents one of the most lethal clinical conditions in intensive care medicine with mortality >40%. Management of different clinical presentations of cardiogenic shock includes guidance of cardiac preload, afterload, heart rate and contractility by differential pharmacological modulation of volume, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance and cardiac output besides reversing the triggering cause. Data from large registries and randomized controlled trials on optimal diagnostic guidance as well as choice of pharmacological agents has accrued significantly in recent years. This state-of-the-art review summarizes the basic concepts of cardiogenic shock, the diagnostic work-up and currently available evidence and guideline recommendations on pharmacological treatment of cardiogenic shock., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest No conflicts to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used in patients with severe cardiorespiratory collapse. Although prior large database reviews of ECMO use in the peripartum population exist, they do not stratify by ECMO indication nor do they include obstetric conditions such as preeclampsia. Our objective was to characterize the incidence, indication-associated mortality, and factors associated with mortality in pregnant patients who underwent ECMO., Methods: We examined the United States National Inpatient Sample database to identify hospitalizations for pregnancy from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2016. We identified pregnant patients who underwent ECMO using International Classification of Diseases ninth and tenth revisions codes. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality across pregnant patients who underwent ECMO for any indication. We evaluated the indication for ECMO, incidence, prevalence of risk factors, comorbidities and conditions, and their association with in-hospital mortality., Results: Fifty-nine of 5'346,517 pregnant patients underwent ECMO during our study period (incidence, 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-1.4 per 100,000 hospitalizations). Indications for ECMO support included respiratory failure (79.7%), cardiogenic shock (64.4%), or circulatory arrest (25.4%). Most patients (57.6%) had more than 1 indication. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 30.5%. Mortality was 29.8% in patients with respiratory failure, 39.5% with cardiogenic shock, 46.7% with cardiac arrest, and 42.4% in those with combined diagnoses. Cardiogenic shock was associated with a significantly higher mortality rate and adjusted odds ratio 5.0 (95% CI, 1.25-27.0). Most patients (62.7%) had one or more comorbidities., Conclusions: The frequency of ECMO use across the pregnant population was low over this time period, with a mortality rate of 1 in 3 patients. Mortality was greatest in patients with cardiogenic shock. Further work is needed to understand how best to improve ECMO outcomes in pregnant patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 International Anesthesia Research Society.)

BACKGROUND A normal coronary angiogram in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) can be considered a myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) until an alternative diagnosis is obtained. However, the COVID-19 pandemic might delay urgent coronary angiography in a resource-limited setting. Perimyocarditis often causes symptoms, such as chest pain, as well as ST-elevation and high cardiac troponin levels. This STEMI mimicker can also cause cardiogenic shock and death when not treated properly. CASE REPORT A 40-year-old man reported having acute onset of substernal chest pain, which was suspected to be STEMI. The patient was an active smoker without any risk factors or a history of cardiovascular disease. The examination showed elevated cardiac troponin I, ST-elevation in high lateral leads, and regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA) by echocardiogram. Furthermore, thrombolytic therapy had failed, and rescue percutaneous coronary intervention was not performed due to the catheterization laboratory limitation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Before coronary angiography, the patient was scheduled for 2 consecutive days of COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) swabs. On the second day of hospitalization, the patient experienced a cardiogenic shock. The COVID-19 PCR results were negative, while coronary angiography revealed normal coronary arteries. The patient was eventually diagnosed with probable acute perimyocarditis. CONCLUSIONS Myocarditis is implicated in young patients without typical cardiovascular risk factors or in those with recent infection and cardiovascular symptoms mimicking acute coronary syndrome. It might also be present in situations where ST-elevation distribution on the electrocardiogram is discordant with the RWMA observed on the echocardiogram.

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: P.R.L. is supported by a career award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.

Children with Coronavirus disease 2019 infection usually have mild symptoms but rarely may present with a life-threatening condition called a multisystem inflammatory syndrome. We report a case of COVID-19-related multisystem inflammatory syndrome in an 8-year-old boy who presented with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocarditis with no features of Kawasaki disease. Cardiogenic shock was refractory to fluids and inotropes. Later, this case was successfully managed with hydrocortisone and intravenous immunoglobulin. Therefore, this case report highlights keeping a lookout for such atypical presentations and early referral to a higher center for timely intervention and aggressive therapy specifically directed against the underlying inflammatory process to ameliorate the outcomes., Keywords: cardiogenic shock; COVID-19; kawasaki disease; myocarditis; Nepal.

Background: Cardiogenic shock-related mortality is substantial, and temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are frequently used. The authors aimed to describe patient characteristics and outcomes in patients with worsening cardiogenic shock requiring escalation of temporary MCS devices., Methods: Worsening cardiogenic shock was defined as persistent hypotension, increasing doses of vasopressors/inotropes, worsening hypoperfusion, or worsening invasive hemo-dynamics. Escalation of temporary MCS devices was defined as adding or exchanging an existing MCS device. Variables were evaluated by logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic curves., Results: From July 1, 2016, to July 1, 2018, a total of 81 consecutive patients experienced worsening cardiogenic shock requiring temporary MCS escalation. The etiology of cardiogenic shock was heterogeneous (33.3% acute myocardial infarction and 61.7% decompen-sated heart failure). Younger age (<62 years), lower body mass index (<28.7 kg/m2), lower preescalation lactate levels (<3.1 mmol/L), higher postescalation blood pressure (>85 mm Hg), and lower postescalation lactate levels (<2.9 mmol/L) were associated with greater odds of survival. The presence of a pulmonary artery catheter at the time of escalation was associated with greater odds of survival (P = .05). Escalation of temporary MCS in Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions stage E shock was associated with 100% mortality (P = .05). The rate of overall survival to discharge was 32%., Conclusion: Patients requiring temporary MCS escalation represent a high-risk cohort. Further work is needed to improve outcomes in this patient population., (© 2022 by the Texas Heart® Institute, Houston.)

There is a lack of data on contemporary trends in the use and outcomes of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for cardiogenic shock (CS) at a national level. Patients with CS admitted during January 1st, 2002-December 31, 2018, were identified from the United States National Inpatient Sample. Among all patients admitted with CS, those who received VA-ECMO were identified. We report the trends in use and outcomes in terms of mortality, exit strategies and complications among all patients who received VA ECMO for CS. Among a total of approximately 1.6 million patients admitted with CS during the period from January 1st, 2002 to December 31, 2018; 25, 621(1.5 %) received VA-ECMO. There has been a 23-fold increase in the use of VA-ECMO over the study period, from 0.1 % in 2002 to 3 % in 2018, with a simultaneous decreasing trend of in hospital mortality from 77 % in 2002 to 50 % in 2018. Only approximately 15 % of VA-ECMO patients are discharged home with most survivors discharged to a skilled nursing facility or short-term rehabilitation. Moreover, only a minor proportion of patients on VA ECMO are bridged to heart replacement therapy with durable LVAD (6 %) or cardiac transplantation (2.5 %). In conclusion, the use of VA-ECMO in CS has increased 23-fold from January 2002 to December 2018 with a concomitant decrease in mortality from 77 % in 2002 to 50 % in 2018, only a minority of patients on VA-ECMO for CS are bridged to durable LVAD or cardiac transplantation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute reversible form of myocardial dysfunction that is often associated with serious adverse in-hospital complications, including acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock and life-threatening arrythmias. In the absence of randomized clinical trials, its management in the acute phase is based on empirical supportive pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures.In this review article, we aimed at providing an overview of the acute clinical manifestations of patients presenting with TTS, highlighting the predictors of a worse short-term outcome, along with the challenges in therapeutic management of TTS-related complications in the acute care setting., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the final common pathway of impaired cardiovascular performance that results in ineffective forward cardiac output producing clinical and biochemical signs of organ hypoperfusion. CS represents the most common cause of shock in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) and accounts for a substantial proportion of CICU patient deaths. Despite significant advances in revascularization techniques, pharmacologic therapeutics and mechanical support devices, CS remains associated with a high mortality rate. Indeed, the prevalence of CS within the CICU appears to be increasing. CS can be differentiated as phenotypes reflecting different metabolic, inflammatory, and hemodynamic profiles, depending also on anatomic substrate and congestion profile. Future prospective studies and clinical trials may further characterize these phenotypes and apply targeted intervention for each phenotype and SCAI SHOCK stage rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. Overall, there are 8 key concepts of CS; 1) the mortality associated with CS; 2) Shock attributed to AMI may be declining in both incidence and associated mortality; 3) providers should think about hemodynamic, metabolic, inflammation and cardiac function in totality to assess CS; 4) CS is a dynamic process; 5) no randomized trials evaluating use of the PAC in patients with CS; 6) most data supporting neosynephrine as first line agent in CS; 7) most registries suggest that almost half of CS patients do not have any mechanical support, and the vast majority of the remainder utilize the IABP; and 8) patients with AMI CS should receive emergent PCI of the culprit vessel., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Before the development of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) was the only potential nonsurgical intervention for patients with aortic stenosis complicated by cardiogenic shock. Emergent TAVR is now an option and has shown acceptable outcomes compared with elective TAVR. We explored how treatment patterns for aortic stenosis and cardiogenic shock among patients received invasive intervention have shifted since TAVR was introduced., Methods: We used the Nationwide In patients Sample to identify nonelective hospitalizations for patient with aortic stenosis complicated by cardiogenic shock who received invasive treatment (TAVR, BAV, or surgical aortic valve replacement [SAVR]). We explored the proportion treated with each treatment modality over time, the patient characteristics and in-hospital mortality associated with each treatment, and used multivariable logistic regression to examine whether changes in in-hospital mortality over time differed by treatment., Results: Between 2010 and 2019, we identified 9899 hospitalizations for decompensated aortic stenosis with cardiogenic shock during which patients received invasive treatment (TAVR 17.7%, BAV 20.2%, SAVR 62.1%). Use of both TAVR and BAV has increased over time compared with SAVR (TAVR 6.6% ≥ 33.8%, BAV 8.4% ≥ 23.2%, SAVR 91.6% ≥ 43.0%; p < 0.001 for trend). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 21.0%, which decreased over time for all treatments (TAVR 20.0% ≥ 18.8%, BAV 66.0% ≥ 25.5%, SAVR 17.7% ≥ 11.8%; linear trend p < 0.001 for each), with lower mortality for TAVR versus BAV at all time points. Patients treated with TAVR (vs. BAV) were less likely to require mechanical ventilation (36.8% vs. 46.3%, p < 0.001) or mechanical circulatory support (22.5% vs. 29.9%, p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, the interaction between treatment and time was not significant (p = 0.245), indicating the reduction in in-hospital mortality over time did not differ among the treatments., Conclusions: Since the introduction of TAVR, there has been a shift toward increased use of nonsurgical invasive treatments (both BAV and TAVR) for aortic stenosis and cardiogenic shock. Although in-hospital mortality has declined, it remains high in all groups, but particularly among patients treated with BAV, where the severity of cardiogenic shock appears to be higher than in those treated with other modalities., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Intraprocedural stent thrombosis is a rare but serious complication of reperfusion therapy for acute coronary syndrome. There is currently no consensus on the intraprocedural management of intraprocedural stent thrombosis. It is difficult to attain thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade 3, particularly in cases of cardiogenic shock. A 49-year-old man who presented with anterior ST-segment elevated acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention to diffuse proximal lesions in the left anterior descending artery under the support of intra-aortic balloon pumping. Intraprocedural stent thrombosis occurred following the postdilations with a 3.5- × 38-mm everolimus-eluting stent. Despite administration of argatroban and nitroprusside, and after frequent balloon inflations using 3.5-mm noncompliant balloons and thrombectomy, the no-reflow phenomenon was repetitively established. However, after brief and prolonged balloon inflations using 3.5- and 3-mm Ryusei perfusion balloon catheters (Kaneka Medix), the diffusely protruded thrombus inside the stent regressed, and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade 3 was obtained. The final intravascular ultrasound image showed a well-suppressed, in-stent thrombus and 24% gain of stent area (from 7.5 to 9.3 mm2). A Ryusei perfusion balloon enabled frequent, long inflation times without deteriorating hemodynamics during reperfusion in ST-segment elevated acute myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock. Thus, extended balloon inflation using a perfusion balloon is deemed a viable option not only for intraprocedural stent thrombosis but also for cases with a high burden of thrombi during the primary stenting procedure for patients with acute coronary syndrome., (© 2022 by the Texas Heart® Institute, Houston.)

In the United States, the frequency of using percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is increasing. These devices require large-bore vascular access to provide left, right, or biventricular cardiac support, frequently under urgent/emergent circumstances. Significant technical and logistical variability exists in device insertion, care, and removal in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and in the cardiac intensive care unit. This variability in practice may contribute to adverse outcomes observed in centers that receive patients with cardiogenic shock, who are at higher risk for circulatory insufficiency, venous stasis, bleeding, and arterial hypoperfusion. In this position statement, we aim to: 1) describe the public health impact of bleeding and vascular complications in cardiogenic shock; 2) highlight knowledge gaps for vascular safety and provide a roadmap for a regulatory perspective necessary for advancing the field; 3) propose a minimum core set of process elements, or "vascular safety bundle"; and 4) develop a possible study design for a pragmatic trial platform to evaluate which structured approach to vascular access drives most benefit and prevents vascular and bleeding complications in practice., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Damluji was supported by research funding from the Pepper Scholars Program of the Johns Hopkins University Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center funded by the National Institute on Aging (P30-AG021334) and mentored patient-oriented research career development award from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (K23-HL153771-01). Dr Samsky received salary support from a National Institutes of Health T32 Training Grant (HL069749). Dr Smilowitz was supported, in part, by the NHLBI (Award Number K23HL150315); and has served on the advisory board for Abbott Vascular. Dr Tehrani has served as a consultant for Medtronic; and on the advisory board for Abbott Medical and Retriever Medical. Dr West is an employee of Abbott Vascular. Dr Moazami has served on an independent provider quality panel for Medtronic related to safety evaluation of mechanical support devices. Dr Truesdell has served as a consultant and a speaker for Abiomed. Dr Dangas has received research grant support from Mt. Sinai Hospital, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Biotronik. Dr Amin has received research grant support from Terumo. Dr Rao has received institutional research funding from Bayer, the NHLBI, and the American College of Cardiology. Dr Krucoff has received consulting and research grants support from Edwards, Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc, Boston Scientific, Bard, Cook Medical, and Terumo. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. The content and opinions expressed in this manuscript do not necessarily reflect guidance or policies of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A 55-year-old man with history of alcoholism presented to our hospital complaining of severe substernal chest pain. After a series of tests and procedures, a large mobile thrombus occupying the left coronary cusp with extension into the ascending aorta was discovered. The patient's hemodynamics remained unstable. After 6 hours of resuscitation, his hemodynamics could not be maintained and eventually, he expired. The autopsy result revealed an ascending aortic aneurysm with atheromatous plaques and focal ulceration without thrombus in the aneurysm. The pathological report showed evidence of acute anterior myocardial infarction, aneurysm with endarteritis and plasma cell infiltration, as well as atherosclerosis with ulcerative plaque. These findings were compatible with syphilitic aortitis. Tertiary syphilis is rarely encountered in current medical practice. Thrombus in the ascending aorta occluding the left coronary artery ostia and resulting in coronary embolus into the left anterior descending is a rare cause of acute anterior ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. The combination of these rare causes raises special attention to early recognition of thrombus forming from the syphilitic aortic aneurysm in the ascending aorta propagating to the coronary artery as a cause of myocardial infarction.

A 59 years old male came to the emergency department with chief complain of dyspnea. Dyspnea has worsened since 3 days before admission accompanied with dyspnea on effort, orthopnea and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. In the emergency department, patient experienced cardiac arrest after defecating, leading to cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 45 minutes. Administration of vasoactive drugs were done and the patient was intubated.Post resucitaiton physical examination showed that the patient was sedated, with blood pressure of 72/40 (on dobutamine support). Peripheral circulation examination showed cold and clammy extremities, skin mottling of the lower extremity with mottling score of 2. CRT is more than 2 seconds. Blood gas analysis showed severe metabolic acidosis with blood lactate of 8.1.Angiographic examination were previously done on the patient during the previous admission with the results of three vessels disease with a chronic total occlusion in the left anterior descending artery. However, patient had refused further intervention regarding the coronary problems. Patient also has longtsanding atrial fibrillation.Patient was admitted into the intensive care unit for further management. Patient was stabilized during admisison in the intensive care with inotropes, however despite the hemodynamic stablilization the skin remain mottled-regardless. Patient had complicating factors in the form of pneumonia and sepsis. Patient had difficulty in weaning the ventilator and died because of arrythmia complication.

Objectives: To evaluate characteristics and outcomes of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMICS) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic., Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has created challenges in delivering acute cardiovascular care. Quality measures and outcomes of patients presenting with AMICS during COVID-19 in the United States have not been well described., Methods: We identified 406 patients from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative (NCSI) with AMICS and divided them into those presenting before (N = 346, 5/9/2016-2/29/2020) and those presenting during the COVID-19 pandemic (N = 60, 3/1/2020-11/10/2020). We compared baseline clinical data, admission characteristics, and outcomes., Results: The median age of the cohort was 64 years, and 23.7% of the group was female. There were no significant differences in age, sex, and medical comorbidities between the two groups. Patients presenting during the pandemic were less likely to be Black compared to those presenting prior. Median door to balloon (90 vs. 88 min, p = 0.38), door to support (88 vs. 78 min, p = 0.13), and the onset of shock to support (74 vs. 62 min, p = 0.15) times were not significantly different between the two groups. Patients presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction more often during the COVID-19 period (95.0% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.005). In adjusted logistic regression models, COVID-19 period did not significantly associate with survival to discharge (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-2.19, p = 0.81) or with 1-month survival (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.42-1.61, p = 0.56)., Conclusions: Care of patients presenting with AMICS has remained robust among hospitals participating in the NCSI during the COVID-19 pandemic., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

In this review, the authors discuss a brief history of the Impella mechanical circulatory support device, a mechanistic role for the device in the context of the underlying pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS), the current body of literature evaluating its role in AMI-CS, and upcoming efforts to identify a role more clearly for the device in AMI-CS.

Background: There is a paucity of data on cardiogenic shock (CS) incidence and outcomes among patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD)., Methods: Women admitted to the hospital for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with and without SCAD were identified from the United States National Readmission Database from October 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018. We calculated the incidence of CS among women with AMI with and without SCAD and odds for developing CS after adjusting for baseline characteristics. In addition, we report the utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention, mechanical circulatory support, severe disability surrogates, and 30-day readmission rates., Results: A total of 664,292 patients admitted for AMI were eligible for analysis, including 6643 patients with SCAD and 657,649 without SCAD. Patients with SCAD were younger (57 years [interquartile range, IQR 48-68] vs. 71 years [IQR 60-81], p < 0.01) and had fewer comorbidities yet had a higher incidence of CS as compared to patients without SCAD (9% vs. 5%, p < 0.01) and remained at elevated risk after adjusting for baseline comorbidities (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.2-1.7]). Among patients who developed CS, those with SCAD had lower in-hospital mortality than non-SCAD (31% vs. 39%, p < 0.01), and were more likely to receive mechanical circulatory support., Conclusions: In a nationally representative sample of women admitted for AMI, we found that patients with SCAD had a higher risk of developing CS and required more frequent use of mechanical circulatory support but were more likely to survive to discharge than women suffering AMI from causes other than SCAD., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a significant cause of global mortality and morbidity since it was first reported in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. COVID19 like previous coronaviruses primarily affects the lungs causing pneumonia, interstitial pneumonitis, and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, there is increasing evidence linking COVID-19 to cardiovascular complications such as arrhythmias, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, fulminant myocarditis, and cardiac death. Given the novelty of this virus, there is paucity of data on some cardiovascular complications of COVID-19, specifically myocarditis. Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the heart muscle with a heterogenous clinical presentation and progression. It is mostly caused by viral infections and is the result of interaction of the virus and the host's immune system. There have been several case reports linking COVID-19 with myocarditis, however the true mechanism of cardiac injury remains under investigation. In this paper we review the clinical presentation, proposed pathophysiology, differential diagnoses and management of myocarditis in COVID-19 patients., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are limited data on the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) in patients with concomitant cancer., Methods: A retrospective cohort of adult AMI-CS admissions was identified from the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2017) and stratified by active cancer, historical cancer, and no cancer. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, use of coronary angiography, use of percutaneous coronary intervention, do-not-resuscitate status, palliative care use, hospitalization costs, and hospital length of stay., Results: Of the 557,974 AMI-CS admissions during this 18-year period, active and historical cancers were noted in 14,826 (2.6%) and 27,073 (4.8%), respectively. From 2000 to 2017, there was a decline in active cancers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.63-0.79]; P &lt; .001) and an increase in historical cancer (adjusted odds ratio, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.89-2.25]; P &lt; .001). Compared with patients with no cancer, patients with active and historical cancer received less-frequent coronary angiography (57%, 67%, and 70%, respectively) and percutaneous coronary intervention (40%, 47%, and 49%%, respectively) and had higher do-not-resuscitate status (13%, 15%, 7%%, respectively) and palliative care use (12%, 10%, 6%%, respectively) (P &lt; .001). Compared with those without cancer, higher in-hospital mortality was found in admissions with active cancer (45.9% vs 37.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.24-1.34]; P &lt; .001) but not historical cancer (40.1% vs 37.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.98-1.04]; P = .39). AMI-CS admissions with cancer had a shorter hospitalization duration and lower costs (all P &lt; .001)., Conclusion: Concomitant cancer was associated with less use of guideline-directed procedures. Active, but not historical, cancer was associated with higher mortality in patients with AMI-CS., (© 2022 by the Texas Heart® Institute, Houston.)

Objective: Our study assesses differences between male and female patients placed on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock., Method: We retrospectively analyzed 574 adult patients placed on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock at our institution between January 2007 and December 2018. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were assessed. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes include limb ischemia, limb ischemia interventions, distal perfusion cannula placement, stroke, bleeding, and continuous venovenous hemofiltration initiation., Results: There were 394 male patients (69%) and 180 female patients (31%). After adjusting for baseline differences, propensity score matching compared 171 male patients with 171 female patients. No difference was seen between men and women in in-hospital mortality (60.2% vs 56.7%; P = .59), limb ischemia (47.4% vs 45.6%; P = .83), limb ischemia surgery (15.2% vs 12.9%; P = .64), bleeding (49.7% vs 49.1%; P = 1), continuous venovenous hemofiltration initiation (39.2% vs 32.7%; P = .26), and stroke (8.2% vs 9.4%; P = .85). Multivariable logistic regression showed that female patients who died were more likely to have had chronic kidney disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-6.53; P = .032) than surviving women. Male patients who died were more likely to have had coronary artery disease (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.34-3.78; P = .002) and higher lactate levels (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08-1.21; P < .001) than surviving men. Women with cardiac transplant primary graft dysfunction were more likely to survive (OR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.27; P = .001), whereas men with cardiac transplant primary graft dysfunction were less likely to survive (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.71; P = .007), than patients with other shock etiologies., Conclusions: After adjusting for baseline difference, there was no difference in outcomes between male and female patients despite differing risk profiles for in-hospital mortality., (Copyright © 2020 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

To provide synthesized evidence on the association of diabetes with clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and associated cardiogenic shock (CS). We analyzed observational studies on patients with AMI and CS, identified through a systematic search using PubMed and Scopus databases. The main outcome was mortality and other outcomes of interest were risk of major bleeding, re-infarction, cerebrovascular adverse events, and need for revascularization. We conducted the meta-analysis with data from 15 studies. Compared to patients without diabetes, those with diabetes had an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.17-1.54) and cerebrovascular complications (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.11-1.48). We found similar risk of major bleeding (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.43-1.09), re-infarction (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.48-1.98) and need for re-vascularization (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.75-1.22) as well as hospital stay lengths (in days) (WMD 0.00; 95% CI, -0.27-0.28; n = 4; I 2 = 99.7%) in the two groups of patients. Patients with diabetes, acute MI and associated cardiogenic shock have increased risks of mortality and adverse cerebrovascular events than those without diabetes.

There have been no studies focusing on how pulmonary hypertension (PH) affects inpatient outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure or cardiogenic shock. This study explores inpatient outcomes of patients with HCM, and concomitant PH compared to patients with HCM. Based on the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016-2018, patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure or cardiogenic shock were selected. The patients diagnosed with concomitant HCM were identified and divided into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of PH. After propensity matching 1545 matched pairs were generated. Patients with PH had a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease (P < 0.001), anemia (P < 0.001), coagulopathy (P < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (P = 0.031), and valvular disease (P < 0.001) (Table 1). The primary outcome (all-cause in-hospital mortality) occurred in 110 patients (2.6%) without PH and 95 patients (5.2%) with PH, which was not statistically significant after propensity matching (odds ratio [OR]:1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-3.33; P = 0. 28) (Table 3). Patients with PH had a higher incidence of transient ischemic attack (TIA) (OR: 9.52; 95% CI: 3.38-26.78; P < 0.001)] and respiratory failure [(OR: 1.49; 95% CI:1.05-2.11; P = 0.027], although with no difference in requirement for mechanical ventilation (= 0.64), as compared to patients without PH. PH in patients with HCM is associated with increased morbidity, including increased risk of TIA and respiratory failure., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Optimal timing to initiate mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unclear with studies showing conflicting results on whether to start before or after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). This study aims to examine the association between mortality and MCS initiated before vs after PPCI in patients with STEMI complicated by CS., Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for abstracts and full-text articles from inception to October 2021. Studies were included if they evaluated the association of mortality in patients who initiated MCS (specifically intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), Impella, and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO)) before PPCI versus after PPCI, specifically in patients with STEMI complicated by CS. Data were integrated using the random-effects models., Results: Ten studies involving 1,352 patients (956, 203, and 193 patients underwent IABP, Impella, and VA-ECMO respectively) with STEMI complicated by CS were included. There was no difference in mortality using IABP before or after PPCI ([OR] 1.77, 95% CI 0.77-1.61, I2 = 27%, p = 0.57). Nevertheless, Impella and VA-ECMO started before PPCI were significantly associated with a reduced risk of mortality compared to that started after PPCI ([OR] 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.92, I2 = 0%, p = 0.03 and [OR] 0.29, 95% CI 0.14-0.62, I2 = 0%, p = 0.001, respectively)., Conclusions: In patients with STEMI complicated by CS undergoing PPCI, the use of IMPELLA or VA-ECMO prior to PPCI significantly decreased mortality, in contrast to IABP, in which no difference in mortality was found between using it before or after PPCI. More rigorous studies are needed to clarify this association., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflict of interest or any source of financial support., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and circulatory failure are life-threatening, and recognizing the underlying etiology and initiating treatment to promote perfusion are key to managing these patients and improving outcomes. This issue reviews the current evidence on diagnosis and management of cardiogenic shock, including oxygen supplementation, red blood cell transfusion, vasopressors, and inotropes. A summary of the various mechanical circulatory support options, including inclusion/exclusion criteria and admission and inter-facility transfer guidance, is included. Special considerations regarding the resuscitation and management of patients with intracorporeal left ventricular assist devices who are experiencing circulatory failure are outlined, including testing, imaging, and treatment.

Objectives: Cardiac support systems are being used increasingly more due to the growing prevalence of heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Reducing cardiac afterload, intracardiac pressure, and flow support are important factors. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and intracardiac microaxial pump systems (Impella) as non-permanent MCS (mechanical circulatory support) are being used increasingly., Methods: We reviewed the recent literature and developed an international European registry for non-permanent MCS., Results: Life-threatening conditions that are observed preoperatively often include reduced left ventricular function, systemic hypoperfusion, myocardial infarction, acute and chronic heart failure, myocarditis, and valve vitia. Postoperative complications that are commonly observed include severe systemic inflammatory response, ischemia-reperfusion injury, trauma-related disorders, which ultimately may lead to low cardiac output (CO) syndrome and organ dysfunctions, which necessitates a prolonged ICU stay. Choosing the appropriate device for support is critical. The management strategies and complications differ by system. The "heart-team" approach is inevitably needed.However despite previous efforts to elucidate these topics, it remains largely unclear which patients benefit from certain systems, when is the right time to initiate (MCS), which support system is appropriate, what is the optimal level and type of support, which therapeutic additive and supportive strategies should be considered and ultimately, what are the future prospects and therapeutic developments., Conclusion: The European cardiac surgical register ImCarS has been established as an IIT with the overall aim to evaluate data received from the daily clinical practice in cardiac surgery. Interested colleagues are cordially invited to join the register., Clinical Registration Number: DRKS00024560., Positive Ethics Vote: AZ 246/20 Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University-Gießen., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cardiovascular diseases and (infarct-related) cardiogenic shock are among the most frequent causes of death in Germany. Adequate clinical care often poses great challenges for hospitals. The complex care of patients in a multi-professional team places high demands on all those involved in the care process. Since nurses in particular are in close contact with patients and play a decisive role in shaping and controlling therapy, a national (intensive) care guideline is urgently needed., Methods: Within the framework of the guideline programme of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), an S1 guideline was developed with the participation of six professional societies and published in May 2022. The guideline group defined relevant topics, which were processed through a systematic literature search in peer-reviewed journals. Based on the S1 classification, no separate evidence review was conducted. A formal consensus-building process was used to classify the recommendations., Results: The guideline contains 36 recommendations ranging from nursing care in the central emergency department to the cardiac catheterisation laboratory, intensive care unit and follow-up care. In addition, recommendations are made on the necessary qualifications and structural requirements in the respective areas in order to ensure a high-quality (nursing) care process., Conclusion: This is the first national intensive care guideline. It is aimed at nurses involved in the care of patients with (infarct-related) cardiogenic shock. The guideline is valid until 30.12.2026., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Introduction: The timing of hemodynamic support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) has yet to be defined. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of timing of Impella initiation on early and midterm mortality., Methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane databases. All studies reporting short-term mortality rates and timing of Impella placement in AMICS were included. Meta-regression analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed on the primary endpoint, short-term mortality (≤30 days), and secondary endpoints (midterm mortality, device-related bleeding, and limb ischemia)., Results: Of 1289 studies identified, 13 studies (6810 patients; 2970 patients identified as receiving Impella pre-PCI and 3840 patients receiving Impella during/post-PCI) were included in this analysis. Median age was 63.8 years (IQR 63-65.7); 76% of patients were male, and a high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors was noted across the entire population. Short-term mortality was significantly reduced in those receiving pre-PCI vs. during/post-PCI Impella support (37.2% vs 53.6%, RR 0.7; CI 0.56-0.88). Midterm mortality was also lower in the pre-PCI Impella group (47.9% vs 73%, RR 0.81; CI 0.68-0.97). The rate of device-related bleeding (RR 1.05; CI 0.47-2.33) and limb ischemia (RR 1.6; CI 0.63-2.15) were similar between the two groups., Conclusion: This analysis suggests that Impella placement prior to PCI in AMICS may have a positive impact on short- and midterm mortality compared with post-PCI, with similar safety outcomes. Due to the observational nature of the included studies, further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis (CRD42022300372)., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a hemodynamically complex multisystem syndrome associated with persistently high morbidity and mortality. As CS is characterized by progressive failure to provide adequate systemic perfusion, supporting end-organ perfusion using mechanical circulatory support (MCS) seems intriguing. Since most patients with CS present in the catheterization laboratory, percutaneously implantable systems have the widest adoption in the field. We evaluated feasibility, outcomes, and complications after the introduction of a full-percutaneous program for both the Impella CP device and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO)., Methods: PREPARE CardShock (PRospective REgistry of PAtients in REfractory cardiogenic shock) is a prospective single-center registry, including 248 consecutive patients between May 2019 and April 2021, who underwent cardiac catheterization and displayed advanced cardiogenic shock. The median age was 70 (58-77) years and 28% were female. Sixty-five percent of the cases had cardiac arrest, of which 66% were out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A local standard operating procedure (SOP) indicating indications as well as relative and absolute contraindications for different means of MCS (Impella CP or VA-ECMO) was used to guide MCS use. The primary endpoint was in-hospital death and secondary endpoints were spontaneous myocardial infarction and major bleedings during the hospital stay., Results: Overall mortality was 50.4% with a median survival of 2 (0-6) days. Significant independent predictors of mortality were cardiac arrest during the index event (odds ratio [OR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.53 [1.43-4.51]; p = 0.001), age > 65 years (OR: 2.05 [1.03-4.09]; p = 0.036]), pH < 7.30 (OR: 2.69 [1.56-4.66]; p < 0.001), and lactate levels > 2 mmol/L (OR: 4.51 [2.37-8.65]; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Conclusive SOPs assist target-orientated MCS use in CS. This study provides guidance on the implementation, validation, and modification of newly established MCS programs to aid centers that are establishing such programs., (© 2022 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides cardiovascular and respiratory support for patients in cardiogenic shock; yet, complications are a frequent source of morbidity and mortality. Limb ischemia can be potentially mitigated by limp perfusion protection strategies (LPPS). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two LPPS in patients treated with peripheral VA-ECMO - prophylactic insertion of a distal perfusion catheter (DPC) and small bore (<17 Fr) arterial return cannula. Among 22 included studies, limb ischemia was reduced in patients receiving a small arterial cannula (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.65; p < 0.001) and in patients receiving a prophylactic DPC (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.21-0.47; p < 0.001). Mortality was not significantly reduced with either a small arterial cannula (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.23-2.18; p = 0.54) or prophylactic DPC strategy (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.67-1.17; p = 0.40). As such, prophylactic insertion of a DPC or smaller bore arterial return cannula appear to reduce the risk of lower limb ischemia in this analysis. Further data are needed to confirm these findings. Registration: Registered in PROSPERO Database (Registration CRD42020215677)., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock has increased dramatically despite a lack of randomized controlled trials or evidence guiding clinical decision-making. Recommendations from professional societies on temporary mechanical circulatory support escalation and de-escalation are limited. This scientific statement provides pragmatic suggestions on temporary mechanical circulatory support device selection, escalation, and weaning strategies in patients with common cardiogenic shock causes such as acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction. The goal of this scientific statement is to serve as a resource for clinicians making temporary mechanical circulatory support management decisions and to propose standardized approaches for their use until more robust randomized clinical data are available.

Acute valvular emergencies represent an important cause of cardiogenic shock. However, their clinical presentation and initial diagnostic testing are often non-specific, resulting in delayed diagnosis. Moreover, metabolic disarray or haemodynamic instability may result in too great a risk for emergent surgery. This review will focus on the aetiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic findings, and treatment options for patients presenting with native acute left-sided valvular emergencies. In addition to surgery, options for medical therapy, mechanical circulatory support, and novel percutaneous interventions are discussed., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: There is a paucity of data on the management and outcomes of chronic viral hepatitis (CVH) patients [including chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and chronic hepatitis C (CHC)] presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI)., Methods: We utilized the National Inpatient Sample database (2001-2019) and studied the management and outcomes of CVH patients with AMI and stratified them by subtypes of CVH. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of adverse outcomes in CVH groups were compared to no-CVH groups using multivariable logistic regression., Results: Of 18,794,686 AMI admissions, 84,147 (0.45%) had a CVH diagnosis. CVH patients had increased odds of adverse outcomes including in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.40, 95%CI 1.31-1.49, p < 0.05), respiratory failure (1.11, 95%CI 1.04-1.17, p < 0.001), vascular complications (1.09, 95%CI 1.04-1.15, p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (1.36, 95%CI 1.30-1.42, p < 0.001), gastrointestinal bleeding (1.57, 95%CI 1.50-1.68, p < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (1.44, 95%CI 1.04-1.30, p < 0.001), sepsis (1.24, 95%CI 1.17-1.31, p < 0.001), and were less likely to undergo invasive management. On subgroup analysis, CHB had higher odds of adverse outcomes than the CHC group (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: CVH patients presenting with AMI are associated with worse clinical outcomes. CHB subgroup had worse outcomes compared to the CHC subgroup.

This article presents two clinical cases of patients with myocardial infarction and stage A (at risk) and B (beginning) cardiogenic shock who underwent intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP). In patients with a high risk of classic cardiogenic shock and/or the no-reflow phenomenon, stenting of the infarct-related coronary artery during this type of mechanical circulatory support was performed without complications. Theoretical and practical aspects of using IABP at different stages of cardiogenic shock are discussed.

Background: Blunt chest injury may induce several cardiovascular traumata, requiring immediate care. Right coronary artery dissection (RCA) is an extremely rare sequela in this setting and is associated with high mortality, if it remains undiagnosed. Case presentation We present the case of an RCA dissection after blunt chest trauma in a 16-year-old patient, who initially presented with a second-degree atrioventricular block as solitary manifestation on admission. Typical electrocardiographic findings, such as ST segmental changes or pathological Q waves were absent. Serial echocardiograms excluded segmental motion abnormalities, pericardial effusion or right ventricular strain. Nevertheless, a complementary computed tomography coronary angiography revealed this potentially lethal condition several hours later. The patient underwent an emergency surgical myocardial revascularization under the circulatory support of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and suffered a prolonged right ventricular insufficiency with severe late-onset cardiogenic shock, due to an extensive myocardial infarction of the inferoseptal ventricular wall., Conclusion: Right coronary artery dissection after high-speed blunt chest injury constitutes a diagnostic challenge, especially in the absence of typical electrocardiographic and echocardiographic findings in young patients. This condition may dramatically deteriorate in time, leading to severe cardiogenic shock and life-threatening arrhythmias., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Risk-stratifying patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) is a major unmet need. The recently proposed Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) staging system for CS severity lacks uniform criteria defining each stage., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to test parameters that define SCAI stages and explore their utility as predictors of in-hospital mortality in CS., Methods: The CS Working Group registry includes patients from 17 hospitals enrolled between 2016 and 2021 and was used to define clinical profiles for CS. We selected parameters of hypotension and hypoperfusion and treatment intensity, confirmed their association with mortality, then defined formal criteria for each stage and tested the association between both baseline and maximum Stage and mortality., Results: Of 3,455 patients, CS was caused by heart failure (52%) or myocardial infarction (32%). Mortality was 35% for the total cohort and higher among patients with myocardial infarction, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and treatment with increasing numbers of drugs and devices. Systolic blood pressure, lactate level, alanine transaminase level, and systemic pH were significantly associated with mortality and used to define each stage. Using these criteria, baseline and maximum stages were significantly associated with mortality (n = 1,890). Lower baseline stage was associated with a higher incidence of stage escalation and a shorter duration of time to reach maximum stage., Conclusions: We report a novel approach to define SCAI stages and identify a significant association between baseline and maximum stage and mortality. This approach may improve clinical application of the staging system and provides new insight into the trajectory of hospitalized CS patients. (Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry [CSWG]; NCT04682483)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by National Institutes of Health RO1 grants (to Dr Kapur) (R01HL139785-01; R01HL159089-01) and institutional grants from Abiomed Inc, Boston Scientific Inc, Abbott Laboratories, Getinge Inc, and LivaNova Inc to Tufts Medical Center. The sponsors had no input on collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, nor in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. Dr Kapur has received consulting honoraria and institutional grant support from Abbott Laboratories, Abiomed Inc, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, LivaNova, Getinge, and Zoll. Dr Kanwar has served on the advisory board for Abiomed Inc. Dr Sinha has served as a consultant for Abiomed Inc. Dr Garan has served as a consultant for NuPulseCV; has served on the scientific advisory board for Abiomed; and is a recipient of research support from Verantos and Abbott. Dr Hernandez-Montfort has served as a consultant for Abiomed Inc. Dr Abraham has served as a consultant for Abbott Laboratories and Abiomed Inc. Dr Nathan has received consulting honoraria from Abiomed, Getinge, and CSI. Dr Hall has served as a consultant to Abiomed, Abbott, and Medtronic. Dr Mahr has served as a consultant to Abbott, Abiomed, and Syncaria. Dr Burkhoff has received an unrestricted, educational grant from Abiomed Inc. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: In patients with cardiogenic shock, delayed surgery after stabilization of haemodynamics and improvement in end-organ function by mechanical circulatory support is known to yield better outcomes than emergency surgery. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) as a bridge to cardiac surgery in patients with cardiogenic shock., Methods: We reviewed 7 patients with cardiogenic shock who underwent Impella support as a bridge to cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass at our institution between April 2018 and August 2021., Results: Cardiogenic shock was caused by ventricular septal rupture in 3 patients, papillary muscle rupture in 1 and acute myocardial infarction in 3. Cardiac surgery was delayed by 1-7 (3.9 ± 2.5) days with Impella support after the diagnosis of cardiogenic shock, during which the hepatic and renal function of the patients improved significantly. Device-related or operation-related adverse events included re-exploration for bleeding in 3 patients, acute limb ischaemia due to thromboembolism in 1 and intraoperative aortic dissection in 1. Thirty-day mortality was 14.3%, and the cumulative survival was 71.4% at 1 year. The survival tended to be better than that in historical control group in which extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used as a bridge to surgery (P = 0.0992)., Conclusions: Impella is an effective tool for bridging patients with cardiogenic shock to surgery. This strategy may improve surgical outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock. However, prolonged Impella support may increase significant adverse events, and further investigation is required to determine the optimal duration of support before surgery., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.)

Objectives: To analyze the characteristics and outcome of Impella mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for Takotsubo syndrome (TS) with cardiogenic shock., Background: TS is an acute heart failure syndrome characterized by transient severe reduction of left ventricular (LV) systolic function, with cardiogenic shock occurring in around 10% of patients. Since inotropes should be avoided due to their role in TS pathogenesis and aggravation of LV outflow tract obstruction, the use of MCS as treatment is a viable treatment option, however, studies are lacking., Methods: The catheter-based ventricular assist device (cVAD) registry and local MCS databases were screened for TS patients with cardiogenic shock (TS-CS) supported with an Impella percutaneous ventricular assist device (pVAD). Patient and treatment characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were retrospectively analyzed., Results: At 10 US and European centers, 16 TS-CS patients supported with an Impella pVAD were identified between December 2013 and May 2018 (mean age, 61.8 ± 15.5 years; 87.5% women). LV ejection fraction (LVEF) at presentation was severely reduced (mean, 19.4 ± 8.3%). Prior to MCS, 13 patients (81.3%) were mechanically ventilated, 4 patients (25.0%) had been resuscitated, and mean serum lactate was 4.7 ± 3.5 mmol/L. Mean duration of Impella support was 1.9 ± 1.0 days (range, 1-4 days). Thirteen patients (81.3%) survived to discharge, and all survivors experienced cardiac recovery with significant improvement of LVEF at discharge compared to baseline (20.4 ± 8.8 vs. 52.9 ± 12.0, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: This is the first series of TS-CS patients supported with an Impella pVAD. Mortality was low, and LV systolic function recovered in all survivors. Prospective studies of Impella support in this special condition are warranted., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: LCN: consultant, lecture and proctoring honoraria, and restricted research funding from Abiomed, lecture honoraria from Abbott and Maquet. Other relationships beyond the topic of this work exist. RW: lecture fees and a restricted research grant from Abiomed. LB: Lecture fees from Abiomed and Boston Scientific, and research grants from AstraZeneca, Biotronik and Abbott. CG: Abiomed advisory board. AMM: is an employee of Abiomed Inc. AS: lecture fees and a restricted research grant from Abiomed. DB: Unrestricted institutional educational grant to Cardiovascular Research Foundation from Abiomed. EMO: Research grants from Abiomed and Chiesi, and consultant to Cytokinetics, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. JB: lecture fees and a restricted research grant from Abiomed. All other authors reported no conflicts of interest related to this work. The authors are solely responsible for the design and conduct of this study, all study analyses, the drafting and editing of the paper, and its final contents., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)