201. Comparison of perinatal and neonatal results of grand multipar refugee women under 35 years of age.
- Author
-
Kızılet, Hakan, Cömert, Ercan, and Işıkalan, Mehmet Murat
- Subjects
- *
PREGNANCY complications , *WOMEN refugees , *MATERNAL age , *ABORTION , *BLOOD loss estimation ,PERINATAL care - Abstract
Objective: Grand multiparity and being a refugee have been adversely associated with perinatal and neonatal outcomes. In this study, we aimed to compare the pregnancy outcomes of both grand multiparous and refugee pregnant women aged 18–34 years. Methods: In this retrospective study, birth data, electronic records, and patient files of refugee women under 35 years of age were scanned. The participants were divided into three groups according to parity: Group I, primiparous; Group II, multiparous; and Group III, grand multiparous. After the patients were divided into groups, the sample groups were randomized into 74 people. The antenatal and neonatal outcomes of the pregnant women included in the groups were recorded. All groups were compared among themselves. Results: There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of age, gravida, and parity (p<0.05). The number of abortions was significant when Groups I and II were compared (p<0.004). Estimated blood loss volume (EBLV) was significantly higher in primiparous pregnancies compared with multiparous pregnancies (p=0.007). The amount of bleeding over 1000 cc was significantly higher in primiparas than in grand multiparas (p=0.039). Conclusion: This study found that grand multiparous refugee pregnancies had similar perinatal and neonatal complication rates to multiparous and nulliparous pregnancies and that grand multiparity alone was not a risk factor. The findings indicate that most of the complications associated with grand multiparity are associated with advanced age, low socioeconomic status, and inadequate antenatal care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF