251. Influence of patient immigrant status on physician trainee diabetes treatment decisions: a virtual patient experimental study
- Author
-
Jesse C. Stewart, Mary de Groot, Loretta Hsueh, Adam T. Hirsh, Tamika C. B. Zapolski, and Kieren J. Mather
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Adverse outcomes ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Immigration ,Emigrants and Immigrants ,Diabetes treatment ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Virtual patient ,Physicians ,Diabetes Mellitus ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Mexico ,General Psychology ,media_common ,030505 public health ,Oral hypoglycemic ,business.industry ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Health psychology ,Family medicine ,Treatment decision making ,0305 other medical science ,business - Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of patient immigrant status on physician trainees’ diabetes treatment decisions. METHODS: Participants were 140 physician trainees (‘providers’). Providers viewed videos and vignettes of virtual patients differing in immigrant status (born in Mexico or U.S.; other characteristics held constant). Analyses were completed at the group and individual levels. RESULTS: Providers were less likely to refer foreign-born (vs. U.S.-born) patients to endocrinology. Individual-level results showed an almost even split between treatment ratings for foreign-born vs. U.S.-born patients for three decisions (take no action, add oral hypoglycemic agent, add/switch to insulin), explaining why group-level differences for these ratings did not emerge (i.e., they were cancelled out). CONCLUSION: Physician trainees are less likely to refer foreign-born patients to endocrinology. Half of individual-level decisions were influenced by patient immigrant status, but group-level analyses mask these differences. Systematic treatment differences based on non-relevant factors could lead to adverse outcomes for immigrants.
- Published
- 2021