Search

Background: In this open-label, randomized, non-comparative, multicenter phase II study (Alliance A091401) we report on three expansion cohorts treated with nivolumab (N) with and without ipilimumab (N+I) and provide a multi-omic correlative analysis of actionable biomarkers., Methods: Patients were randomized (non-comparative) to receive either N or N+I. The primary endpoint was a 6-month confirmed response rate (CRR) defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary endpoints included treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), progression-free survival, and overall survival. Multi-omic correlative analyses were conducted using samples from both the primary and expansion cohorts., Results: A total of 66 patients were evaluated for the primary endpoint with disease including gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST, n=18), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS, n=24), and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS, n=24). Neither N nor N+I achieved a complete or partial response in the GIST expansion cohort. In DDLPS and UPS, the primary response endpoint of CRR was met with N+I (both 16.6%, 2/12) but not with N alone (both 8.3%, 1/12). In the GIST cohort, TRAE was higher with N+I treatment, halting enrollment as required per protocol. In a correlative analysis of patients for the expansion cohort and the original cohort (n=86), traditional biomarkers of immunotherapy response were not correlated with response in any histological subtype. Markers of genomic instability including the presence of gene fusions and increased subclonal mutations correlated with improved clinical outcomes., Conclusions: This expansion cohort reaffirms the outcomes of A091401. There remains a pressing need to determine the role of and predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in sarcoma., Trial Registration Number: NCT02500797., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JLC: Foundation Medicine (personal fees), Tempus (employment); BVT: Daiichi Sankyo Inc (personal fees), Deciphera Pharmaceuticals (personal fees), Advenchen (personal fees), Putnam (personal fees), Boxer Capital LLC (personal fees), Acuta Capital Partners, LLC (personal fees), Aadi (personal fees), Race Oncology (personal fees), Hinge Bio, Inc (personal fees), Kronos Bio, Inc, (personal fees) Sonata Therapeutics, Inc. (personal fees), Total Health Conference (personal fees), Adaptimmune (other support), Boehringer Ingelheim (consulting/licensing), Accuronix Therapeutics (patent), Polaris (non-paid member of Scientific/Safety Board); DAL: AADI Bioscience (consulting), MatchTx, LLC (patents); all other authors declare no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Traditionally sarcomas have been considered immunologically quiet tumours, with low tumour mutational burden (TMB) and an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME), consisting of decreased T-cell infiltration and elevated levels of H1F1α, macrophages and neutrophils. 1,2 However, research has shown that a subset of sarcomas are immunologically 'hot' with either high TMB, PDL-1 expression, CD8+ T cells or presence of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) demonstrating sensitivity to immunotherapy. 3,4 Here, we review the current evidence for immunotherapy use in bone sarcomas (BS) and soft tissue sarcomas (STS), with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and adoptive cellular therapies including engineered T-cell therapies, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and cancer vaccines and biomarkers of response.

Background: Afamitresgene autoleucel (afami-cel) showed acceptable safety and promising efficacy in a phase 1 trial (NCT03132922). The aim of this study was to further evaluate the efficacy of afami-cel for the treatment of patients with HLA-A*02 and MAGE-A4-expressing advanced synovial sarcoma or myxoid round cell liposarcoma., Methods: SPEARHEAD-1 was an open-label, non-randomised, phase 2 trial done across 23 sites in Canada, the USA, and Europe. The trial included three cohorts, of which the main investigational cohort (cohort 1) is reported here. Cohort 1 included patients with HLA-A*02, aged 16-75 years, with metastatic or unresectable synovial sarcoma or myxoid round cell liposarcoma (confirmed by cytogenetics) expressing MAGE-A4, and who had received at least one previous line of anthracycline-containing or ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy. Patients received a single intravenous dose of afami-cel (transduced dose range 1·0 × 10 9 -10·0 × 10 9 T cells) after lymphodepletion. The primary endpoint was overall response rate in cohort 1, assessed by a masked independent review committee using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (version 1.1) in the modified intention-to-treat population (all patients who received afami-cel). Adverse events, including those of special interest (cytokine release syndrome, prolonged cytopenia, and neurotoxicity), were monitored and are reported for the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04044768; recruitment is closed and follow-up is ongoing for cohorts 1 and 2, and recruitment is open for cohort 3., Findings: Between Dec 17, 2019, and July 27, 2021, 52 patients with cytogenetically confirmed synovial sarcoma (n=44) and myxoid round cell liposarcoma (n=8) were enrolled and received afami-cel in cohort 1. Patients were heavily pre-treated (median three [IQR two to four] previous lines of systemic therapy). Median follow-up time was 32·6 months (IQR 29·4-36·1). Overall response rate was 37% (19 of 52; 95% CI 24-51) overall, 39% (17 of 44; 24-55) for patients with synovial sarcoma, and 25% (two of eight; 3-65) for patients with myxoid round cell liposarcoma. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 37 (71%) of 52 of patients (one grade 3 event). Cytopenias were the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events (lymphopenia in 50 [96%], neutropenia 44 [85%], leukopenia 42 [81%] of 52 patients). No treatment-related deaths occurred., Interpretation: Afami-cel treatment resulted in durable responses in heavily pre-treated patients with HLA-A*02 and MAGE-A4-expressing synovial sarcoma. This study shows that T-cell receptor therapy can be used to effectively target solid tumours and provides rationale to expand this approach to other solid malignancies., Funding: Adaptimmune., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests EC reports participation in an advisory board for Adaptimmune; and research support paid to their institution for clinical trial activities from Adaptimmune, Novartis, Tracon, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Bayer, Amgen, and Mirati. J-YB reports grants paid to institution from Netsarc+ and Euracan; and research support and honoraria from Adaptimmune and GSK. FT reports research support paid to institution for clinical trial activities from Adaptimmune, Achilles Therapeutics, T-knife Therapeutics, GSK, Immunocore, and Instil Bio; consulting fees from T-knife Therapeutics; speaker fees from Kite and Royal Marsden Hospital Cell Therapy Preceptorship; travel or meeting support from Kite; advisory board fees from Immatics, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), GSK, Janssen, Leucid, and Scenic Biotech; institutional advisory board fees from Pfizer; and is an unpaid panel member with Sarcoma UK, Cancer Research UK New Agents Committee, and the Medical Research Council Developmental pathway funding scheme. MA reports institutional support from Exelixis; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Aadi; and honoraria from Regeneron, Deciphera, and Bayer. EF reports honoraria from Novartis, Alexion, Astellas, GSK, Gilead, and Sanofi; and travel or meeting support from Novartis, Alexion, Gilead, Sanofi, MSD, and Neovii. SJS reports consulting fees from Ceridwen Oncology; honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim; travel or meeting support from Adaptimmune; and participated on advisory or data safety monitoring boards for GSK and Inhibrx. ARAR reports support from Adaptimmune, AbbVie, Amgen, Blueprint Medicines, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Iterion Therapeutics, Karyopharm Therpaeutics, MedImmune, Merck, Neoleuki Therapeutics, Pfizer, Rain Therapeutics, Roche/Genentech, and Symphogen; honoraria from Medison; and participated on advisory or data safety monitoring boards for Adaptimmune, Bayer, GSK, Inhibrx, and Medison. SMS reports institutional support from Adaptimmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Rain Oncology, Shanghai Pharma, and TRACON; royalties or licenses from UpToDate; participated on an advisory or data safety monitoring board for Bioatla; and is an unpaid National Comprehensive Cancer Network Soft Tissue Sarcoma committee member. CMVM reports institutional support from Adaptimmune; consulting fees from Deciphera; honoraria from Bayer; travel or meeting support from PharmaMar; and participation on advisory or data safety monitoring boards for PharmaMar, Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. MJW reports consulting fees from Adaptimmune, Deciphera, Aadi, Epizyme, and PharmaEssentia. JG reports support from Adaptimmune for this study. VM reports consulting fees from Roche, Bayer, Pieris, BMS, Janssen, Basilea, Regeneron/Sanofi, and Nanobiotix; and institutional support from AbbVie, AceaBio, Adaptimmune, ADC Therapeutics, Aduro, Agenus, Amcure, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, BioInvent International, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, e-Therapeutics, Exelisis, Forma Therapeutics, Genmab, GSK, Harpoon, Hutchison, Immutep, Incyte, Inovio, Iovance, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Lilly, Loxo, MedSir, Menarini, Merck, Merus, Millenium, MSD, Nanobiotix, Nektar, Novartis, Odonate Therapeutics, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Pricipia, PsiOxus, Puma, Regeneron, Rigontec, Roche, Sanofi, Sierra Oncology, Synthon, Taiho, Takeda, Tesaro, Transgene, Turning Point Therapeutics, and Upsher-Smith. LH, TW, JB, AS, LF, EVW, EN, DW, RW, J-MN, SR, and EE are employees of, and have stock options in, Adaptimmune. SB, CM, and CL were employees of Adaptimmune at the time of the study. VLK reports institutional support from Adaptimmune, Deciphera, Plexxikon, Advenchen, Boehringer Ingelheim, and TRACON; consulting fees from Epizyme; and honoraria from Deciphera. WDT reports institutional support from Adaptimmune; consulting and travel fees from Eli Lilly; consulting fees from C4 Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Adcendo, Ayala Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Servier, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Epizyme, Cogent, Medpacto, Foghorn Therapeutics, Amgen, AmMax Bio, Boehringer Ingelheim, BioAtla, Inhibrx, PharmaEssentia, Avacta, Ipsen, Sonata, Curadev, Nuvation Bio, and Abbisko; has patents pending for companion diagnostics with Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY, USA); is on advisory boards of Innova Therapeutics and the Osteosarcoma Institute; is on the advisory board and holds stock in Certis Oncology Solutions; and is a co-founder and has stock in Atropos Therapeutics. JAC reports consulting fees from Adaptimmune and Deciphera; and honoraria from Adaptimmune. BAVT reports a research grant from Polaris; royalties or licenses from Accuronix Therapeutics; consulting fees from Bayer, Deciphera, GIST Expert Interview Project, Daiichi Sankyo, EcoR1, Advenchen, Putnam, Salarius Pharmaceuticals, Boxer Capital, Acuta Capital Partners, Aadi, Race Oncology, Hinge Bio, Kronos Bio, and Sonata Therapeutics; honoraria from Total Health Conference and Iterion Therapeutics; travel or meeting support from Adaptimmune, Kronos Bio, Advenchen Laboratories, and Polaris; has a patent with Accuronix Therapeutics; participated in advisory boards for Apexigen, Daiichi Sankyo, Epizyme, Bayer, PTC Therapeutics, Aadi Biosciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, Agenus, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Exp, Advenchen, EcoR1 Capital, Curis, and Inhibrx; and is a board member for Polaris. GDD reports institutional support from Adaptimmune, Bayer, Novartis, PharmaMar, and Daiichi-Sankyo; is a co-founder and scientific advisory board member with minor equity holding in IDRx; is a consultant or scientific advisory board member with minor equity holding in G1 Therapeutics, Caris Life Sciences, Erasca Pharmaceuticals, RELAY Therapeutics, Bessor Pharmaceuticals, CellCarta, Ikena Oncology, Kojin Therapeutics, Aadi Biosciences, Acrivon Therapeutics, Blueprint Medicines, Tessellate Bio, and Boundless Bio; and is a scientific consultant for EMD-Serono/Merck KGaA, WCG/Arsenal Capital, Rain Therapeutics, and Minghui Pharmaceuticals. SPD'A reports institutional support from Adaptimmune for this study; grants, contracts, consulting fees, and honoraria from EMD Serono, Amgen, Nektar, Immune Design, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Merck, Adaptimmune, Immunocore, Pfizer, Servier, Rain Therapeutics, GI Innovations, and Aadi Biosciences; travel support from Adaptimmune, EMD Serono, and Nektar; participation on advisory boards for GlaxoSmithKline, Nektar, Adaptimmune, and Merck; and a leadership or fiduciary role at the Connective Tissue Oncology Society in 2023–24. SA reports institutional support from Adaptimmune for this study; and institutional support from TRACON Pharma, Ayala Pharmaceuticals, Cogent Biosciences, InhibRx, Rain Therapeutics, Trillium Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Salarius Pharmaceuticals, Theseus Pharmaceuticals, Monopar Therapeutics, C4 Therapeutics, Noxopharm, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Shanghai Pharma, and PharmaMar. KNG reports participation in advisory boards for Adaptimmune, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Deciphera. MD reports consultancy fees and advisory board fees from Deciphera, Aadi Bioscience, and Daiichi Sankyo. BAW reports consultancy fees from Springworks, Deciphera, Epizyme, Adcendo, Polaris, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AADi, research funding from Exelixis, and travel support from Agenus. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Characterization of the diverse malignant and stromal cell states that make up soft tissue sarcomas and their correlation with patient outcomes has proven difficult using fixed clinical specimens. Here, we employed EcoTyper, a machine-learning framework, to identify the fundamental cell states and cellular ecosystems that make up sarcomas on a large scale using bulk transcriptomes with clinical annotations. We identified and validated 23 sarcoma-specific, transcriptionally defined cell states, many of which were highly prognostic of patient outcomes across independent datasets. We discovered three conserved cellular communities or ecotypes associated with underlying genomic alterations and distinct clinical outcomes. We show that one ecotype defined by tumor-associated macrophages and epithelial-like malignant cells predicts response to immune-checkpoint inhibition but not chemotherapy and validate our findings in an independent cohort. Our results may enable identification of patients with soft tissue sarcomas who could benefit from immunotherapy and help develop new therapeutic strategies., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Purpose: We conducted research on CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) simultaneously in the preclinical and clinical spaces to gain a deeper understanding of how senescence influences tumor growth in humans., Patients and Methods: We coordinated a first-in-kind phase II clinical trial of the CDK4/6i abemaciclib for patients with progressive dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) with cellular studies interrogating the molecular basis of geroconversion., Results: Thirty patients with progressing DDLS enrolled and were treated with 200 mg of abemaciclib twice daily. The median progression-free survival was 33 weeks at the time of the data lock, with 23 of 30 progression-free at 12 weeks (76.7%, two-sided 95% CI, 57.7%-90.1%). No new safety signals were identified. Concurrent preclinical work in liposarcoma cell lines identified ANGPTL4 as a necessary late regulator of geroconversion, the pathway from reversible cell-cycle exit to a stably arrested inflammation-provoking senescent cell. Using this insight, we were able to identify patients in which abemaciclib induced tumor cell senescence. Senescence correlated with increased leukocyte infiltration, primarily CD4-positive cells, within a month of therapy. However, those individuals with both senescence and increased TILs were also more likely to acquire resistance later in therapy. These suggest that combining senolytics with abemaciclib in a subset of patients may improve the duration of response., Conclusions: Abemaciclib was well tolerated and showed promising activity in DDLS. The discovery of ANGPTL4 as a late regulator of geroconversion helped to define how CDK4/6i-induced cellular senescence modulates the immune tumor microenvironment and contributes to both positive and negative clinical outcomes. See related commentary by Weiss et al., p. 649., (©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Importance: Inhibition of the T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT)/poliovirus receptor pathway may amplify the antitumor immune response of atezolizumab in programmed death ligand 1-selected tumors., Objective: To evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of the anti-TIGIT antibody tiragolumab and its combination with atezolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors., Design, Setting, and Participants: The GO30103 open-label, first-in-human phase 1a/1b dose-escalation and dose-expansion nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted at 13 sites in 6 countries (Australia, Canada, France, Korea, Spain, and the US). The start dates were May 23, 2016, for phase 1a and October 11, 2016, for phase 1b. Patients were aged 18 years or older with measurable disease at baseline. The clinical cutoff date was October 1, 2021. Data analysis was performed on January 24, 2022., Interventions: Patients received fixed-dose intravenous tiragolumab on day 1 of each 21-day cycle (2 mg escalating to 1200 mg) in phase 1a, plus fixed-dose intravenous atezolizumab (1200 mg every 3 weeks) in phase 1b. Patients were treated until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, or development of unacceptable toxicity., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points included the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of tiragolumab or combination tiragolumab plus atezolizumab. The secondary end point included the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Counts and percentages are used for categorical variables, and medians and ranges are used for continuous variables., Results: Among the phase 1a (n = 24) and 1b (n = 49) dose-escalation cohorts, the median age was 60 (range, 40-77) and 54 (range, 25-81) years, respectively. More than half of patients were women (14 of 24 [58%] and 25 of 49 [51%]), and more than a third (10 [42%] and 18 [37%]) had received 4 or more prior cancer therapies. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred, and the maximum tolerated dose of tiragolumab was not reached (NR). The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (5 of 24 [21%]) in phase 1a and pruritus (5 of 49 [10%]) in phase 1b; the majority of AEs were grade 1 or 2. Immune-mediated AEs occurred in 4 of 24 (17%) and 29 of 49 (59%) patients during phases 1a and 1b, respectively (primarily grade 1 or 2). The RP2D of tiragolumab was 600 mg intravenously every 3 weeks, which was tested in phase 1b dose expansion. The confirmed ORR was 0% during phase 1a, with evidence of antitumor activity in 6% of patients (n = 3) during phase 1b. The safety profile of combination tiragolumab plus atezolizumab in phase 1b was similar in the dose-escalation and dose-expansion cohorts. The confirmed ORR was 46% (6 of 13) in the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cohort (median duration of response [DOR], NR) and 28% (5 of 18) in the esophageal cancer (EC) cohort (median DOR, 15.2 [95% CI, 7.0 to NR] months)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this nonrandomized controlled trial, tiragolumab was well tolerated with or without atezolizumab; no new safety signals were observed. Preliminary antitumor activity was demonstrated for the combination regimen in patients with cancer immunotherapy-naive metastatic NSCLC or EC., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02794571.

The association between immune-related AEs (irAE) and outcome in patients with sarcoma is not known. We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of patients with advanced sarcoma treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)-based therapy. Association of irAEs with survival was assessed using a Cox regression model that incorporated irAE occurrence as a time-dependent covariate. Tumor samples with available RNA sequencing data were stratified by presence of an irAE to identify patterns of differential gene expression. A total of 131 patients were included. Forty-two (32%) had at least one irAE of any grade and 16 (12%) had at least one grade ≥ 3 irAE. The most common irAEs were hypothyroidism (8.3%), arthralgias (5.3%), pneumonitis (4.6%), allergic reaction (3.8%), and elevated transaminases (3.8%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of study entry were 11.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.7-15.0) and 74.6 weeks (CI, 44.9-89.7), respectively. On Cox analysis adjusting for clinical covariates that were significant in the univariate setting, the HR for an irAE (HR, 0.662; CI, 0.421-1.041) approached, but did not reach statistical significance for PFS (P = 0.074). Patients had a significantly lower HR for OS (HR, 0.443; CI, 0.246-0.798; P = 0.007) compared with those without or before an irAE. Gene expression profiling on baseline tumor samples found that patients who had an irAE had higher numbers of tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells, CD8+ T cells, and regulatory T cells as well as upregulation of immune and inflammatory pathways., Significance: irAE after ICB therapy was associated with an improved OS; it also approached statistical significance for improved PFS. Patients who had an irAE were more likely to have an inflamed tumor microenvironment at baseline., (© 2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Epacadostat, an indole 2,3 dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) inhibitor, proposed to shift the tumor microenvironment toward an immune-stimulated state, showed early promise in melanoma but has not been studied in sarcoma. This study combined epacadostat with pembrolizumab, which has modest activity in select sarcoma subtypes., Patients and Methods: This phase II study enrolled patients with advanced sarcoma into five cohorts including (i) undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS)/myxofibrosarcoma, (ii) liposarcoma (LPS), (iii) leiomyosarcoma (LMS), (iv) vascular sarcoma, including angiosarcoma and epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE), and (v) other subtypes. Patients received epacadostat 100 mg twice daily plus pembrolizumab at 200 mg/dose every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was best objective response rate (ORR), defined as complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), at 24 weeks by RECIST v.1.1., Results: Thirty patients were enrolled [60% male; median age 54 years (range, 24-78)]. The best ORR at 24 weeks was 3.3% [PR, n = 1 (leiomyosarcoma); two-sided 95% CI, 0.1%-17.2%]. The median PFS was 7.6 weeks (two-sided 95% CI, 6.9-26.7). Treatment was well tolerated. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 23% (n = 7) of patients. In paired pre- and post-treatment tumor samples, no association was found between treatment and PD-L1 or IDO1 tumor expression or IDO-pathway-related gene expression by RNA sequencing. No significant changes in serum tryptophan or kynurenine levels were observed after baseline., Conclusions: Combination epacadostat and pembrolizumab was well tolerated and showed limited antitumor activity in sarcoma. Correlative analyses suggested that inadequate IDO1 inhibition was achieved., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Soft tissue sarcoma is a rare and aggressive disease with a 40 to 50% metastasis rate. The limited efficacy of traditional approaches with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy has prompted research in novel immunotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-CTLA-4 and PD-1 therapies in STS have demonstrated histologic-specific responses. Some combinations of immunotherapy with chemotherapy, TKI, and radiation were effective. STS is considered a 'cold', non-inflamed tumor. Adoptive cell therapies are actively investigated in STS to enhance immune response. Genetically modified T-cell receptor therapy targeting cancer testis antigens such as NY-ESO-1 and MAGE-A4 demonstrated durable responses, especially in synovial sarcoma. Two early HER2-CAR T-cell trials have achieved stable disease in some patients. In the future, CAR-T cell therapies will find more specific targets in STS with a reliable response. Early recognition of T-cell induced cytokine release syndrome is crucial, which can be alleviated by immunosuppression such as steroids. Further understanding of the immune subtypes and biomarkers will promote the advancement of soft tissue sarcoma treatment., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Seong and D’Angelo.)

Despite a wide spectrum of clinical presentations, including primary or secondary, most angiosarcomas are considered high grade. One exception is primary breast angiosarcoma, where historically, histologic grading has shown to predict outcome using the Rosen 3-tier system. However, more recent studies have challenged this concept suggesting that even in this specific clinical context angiosarcomas should be considered high grade. This study aimed to critically reevaluate the impact of histologic grade in a clinically uniform cohort managed at a single institution using a newly proposed grading system. Our study included 49 primary breast angiosarcomas diagnosed during 1994 to 2022 (median follow-up: 33 mo), classified as low grade (29%), intermediate grade (20%), and high grade (51%), based on mitotic count, extent of solid components, and necrosis. At last follow-up, 22% patients developed locoregional recurrences, 63% distant metastases, and 47% patients died of disease. As patients with low and intermediate-grade angiosarcomas had relatively similar outcomes, our cohort was further analyzed using a 2-tier system (low grade and high grade). Targeted-DNA next-generation sequencing (505 cancer gene panel) performed in 11 cases found KDR mutations in 78% and PIK3CA mutations in 44% of high-grade lesions. Histologic grade, by either 3-tier or 2-tier grading systems, had a strong impact on survival, with the 2-tier system being an independent predictor of disease-specific survival and overall survival. Based on 2-tier system, the 5-year overall survival was 38% for high-grade angiosarcoma and 74% for low-grade angiosarcoma. PIK3CA mutations alone or concurrent with KDR alterations were identified in angiosarcomas with worse prognosis., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: Funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748 (all authors), P50 CA217694 (C.R.A.), Cycle for Survival (C.R.A.), and Angiosarcoma Awareness (C.R.A.). The authors have disclosed that they have no significant relationships with, or financial interest in, any commercial companies pertaining to this article., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

TRAF7 somatic mutations are rare and have been reported in meningiomas, intraneural perineuriomas, and mesotheliomas. Triggered by an index case of an unclassified low-grade mesenchymal tumor with TRAF7 mutation as the only genetic alteration, we searched our files and identified 2 additional cases with similar features. The tumors arose in 2 females and 1 male, aged 63 to 75 years old (median: 67 y). They were infiltrative deep soft tissue masses involving the shoulder, chest wall, and thigh, measuring 7.0 to 9.1 cm in greatest dimensions. One tumor was locally aggressive, and 2 were associated with lung and bone metastases. The tumors displayed alternating fibrous and myxoid stroma with mild to moderate cellularity and consisted of uniform spindle cells with open chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli and scant cytoplasm. Significant mitotic activity or necrosis were not present. However, the metastatic tumor of 1 case showed an epithelioid morphology and brisk mitotic activity. Immunohistochemically, the tumors showed nonspecific and focal smooth muscle actin or CD34 expression. By DNA sequencing, all 3 cases harbored TRAF7 missense mutations involving the C-terminal WD40 domains as the only somatic mutations, showed nonrecurrent focal copy number alterations, and were negative for gene fusions by targeted RNA sequencing. On methylation profiling, the tumors clustered with the undifferentiated sarcoma and myxofibrosarcoma methylation classes and were distinct from morphologic mimics. On follow-up (5 to 36 mo), 2 patients died of disease following aggressive chemotherapeutic regimens. We describe a novel TRAF7- mutated mesenchymal tumor characterized by aggressive clinical behavior despite the histologic appearance of a low-grade fibromyxoid spindle cell tumor., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: Supported by: P50 CA217694 (C.R.A.), P30 CA008748 (C.R.A.), Cycle for Survival (C.R.A.), Kristin Ann Carr Foundation (C.R.A.). The authors have disclosed that they have no significant relationships with, or financial interest in, any commercial companies pertaining to this article., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recurrence after resection of metastatic sarcoma is common. The gangliosides GM2, GD2 and GD3 are strongly expressed across sarcoma subtypes. We hypothesised that generation of anti-ganglioside antibodies would control micrometastases and improve outcomes in sarcoma patients who were disease-free after metastasectomy., Methods: We conducted a randomised phase II trial of the immunological adjuvant OPT-821 with a KLH-conjugated ganglioside vaccine targeting GM2, GD2 and GD3, versus OPT-821 alone in patients with metastatic sarcoma following complete metastasectomy. Patients received 10 subcutaneous injections at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 28, 40, 52, 68 and 84 and were followed for evidence of recurrent disease. The primary end-point was relapse-free survival. Secondary end-points included overall survival and serologic response., Results: A total of 136 patients were randomised, 68 to each arm. The mean age was 51.2, 52.2% were male, 90.4% had relapsed disease, 86.8% had high-grade tumours and 14% had ≥4 metastases resected. Histologies included leiomyosarcoma (33%), spindle cell sarcoma (14%), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (13%), osteosarcoma (10%), synovial sarcoma (9%), liposarcoma (9%) and others (12%). Most adverse events were Grade ≤2 (83.8% and 70.6% in the vaccine and adjuvant arms, respectively). The most common (≥20% of patients) were injection site reaction (89.7%), fatigue (44.1%) and pyrexia (27.9%) on the vaccine arm, and injection site reaction (69.1%) on the adjuvant only arm. The 1-year relapse-free survival rate (34.5% and 34.8% in the vaccine and OPT-821 monotherapy arm, respectively) did not differ between arms (P = 0.725). One-year overall survival rates were 93.1% and 91.5% in the vaccine and OPT-821 monotherapy arm, respectively (P = 0.578). Serologic responses at week 9 were more frequent on the vaccine arm (96.5% of patients) than in the adjuvant arm (32.8%), and the difference between groups was durable., Conclusions: A sustained serologic response to vaccination was induced with the vaccine, but no difference in recurrence-free or overall survival was observed between treatment arms., Clinicaltrials: gov identifier: NCT01141491., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Autologous T cells transduced to express a high affinity T-cell receptor specific to NY-ESO-1 (letetresgene autoleucel, lete-cel) show promise in the treatment of metastatic synovial sarcoma, with 50% overall response rate. The efficacy of lete-cel treatment in 45 synovial sarcoma patients (NCT01343043) has been previously reported, however, biomarkers predictive of response and resistance remain to be better defined. This post-hoc analysis identifies associations of response to lete-cel with lymphodepleting chemotherapy regimen (LDR), product attributes, cell expansion, cytokines, and tumor gene expression. Responders have higher IL-15 levels pre-infusion (p = 0.011) and receive a higher number of transduced effector memory (CD45RA- CCR7-) CD8 + cells per kg (p = 0.039). Post-infusion, responders have increased IFNγ, IL-6, and peak cell expansion (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p = 0.016, respectively). Analysis of tumor samples post-treatment illustrates lete-cel infiltration and a decrease in expression of macrophage genes, suggesting remodeling of the tumor microenvironment. Here we report potential predictive and pharmacodynamic markers of lete-cel response that may inform LDR, cell dose, and strategies to enhance anticancer efficacy., (© 2022. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a subset of sarcoma, a rare group of heterogeneous malignancies of mesenchymal origin. Current standard of care involves surgical resection with systemic chemotherapy used to treat high-risk localized and metastatic disease. Though classically thought to be immunologically quiet tumors, STS interact with the immune system, undergoing immunoediting that alters tumor immunogenicity and the tumor microenvironment. Recent advances with immune checkpoint inhibition have led to clinical trials exploring the efficacy of immunotherapy in treating STS. Results from these trials point to histologic subtype-specific clinical activity of immune checkpoint blockade. In addition, combinatorial strategies adding immune checkpoint inhibition to local or systemic therapies for STS have further increased their efficacy. Targeted immunotherapies using engineered T-cell receptor-based approaches also show increasing promise as treatment options for some patients with STS. Adoptive transfer of autologous T cells targeting NY-ESO-1 and MAGE-A4 have high response rates in sarcomas expressing these antigens, although recurrence is often seen in responding patients. Future work must focus on identifying primary and acquired mechanisms of resistance to these therapies, and extend T-cell receptor discovery to other tumor-associated antigens.

Early experiences with modern immunotherapy have been disappointing in trials of unselected sarcoma subtypes. However, remarkable efficacy has been observed with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in a subset of patients, with the most promising outcomes to date in alveolar soft part sarcoma, cutaneous angiosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (dLPS). Adoptive cellular therapies targeting cancer testis antigens have shown promising activity, but only synovial sarcoma (SS) and myxoid/round cell liposarcomas reliably express these targets. The majority of sarcomas are immunologically "cold" with sparse immune infiltration, which may explain the poor response to immunotherapy. Current immunotherapy trials for sarcomas explore combination therapies with checkpoint inhibitors to overcome immune evasion and novel targets in adoptive cellular therapies. The role of tertiary lymphoid structures, PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, and tumor lymphocytes as biomarkers for response are areas of active investigation. In this review, we highlight prior and ongoing clinical efforts to improve outcomes with immunotherapy and discuss the current state of understanding for biomarkers to select patients most likely to benefit from this approach., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

PD-1 blockade (nivolumab) efficacy remains modest for metastatic sarcoma. In this paper, we present an open-label, non-randomized, non-comparative pilot study of bempegaldesleukin, a CD122-preferential interleukin-2 pathway agonist, with nivolumab in refractory sarcoma at Memorial Sloan Kettering/MD Anderson Cancer Centers (NCT03282344). We report on the primary outcome of objective response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints of toxicity, clinical benefit, progression-free survival, overall survival, and durations of response/treatment. In 84 patients in 9 histotype cohorts, all patients experienced ≥1 adverse event and treatment-related adverse event; 1 death was possibly treatment-related. ORR was highest in angiosarcoma (3/8) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (2/10), meeting predefined endpoints. Results of our exploratory investigation of predictive biomarkers show: CD8 + T cell infiltrates and PD-1 expression correlate with improved ORR; upregulation of immune-related pathways correlate with improved efficacy; Hedgehog pathway expression correlate with resistance. Exploration of this combination in selected sarcomas, and of Hedgehog signaling as a predictive biomarker, warrants further study in larger cohorts., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

There are more than 70 distinct sarcomas, and this diversity complicates the development of precision-based therapeutics for these cancers. Prospective comprehensive genomic profiling could overcome this challenge by providing insight into sarcomas' molecular drivers. Through targeted panel sequencing of 7494 sarcomas representing 44 histologies, we identify highly recurrent and type-specific alterations that aid in diagnosis and treatment decisions. Sequencing could lead to refinement or reassignment of 10.5% of diagnoses. Nearly one-third of patients (31.7%) harbor potentially actionable alterations, including a significant proportion (2.6%) with kinase gene rearrangements; 3.9% have a tumor mutational burden ≥10 mut/Mb. We describe low frequencies of microsatellite instability (<0.3%) and a high degree of genome-wide loss of heterozygosity (15%) across sarcomas, which are not readily explained by homologous recombination deficiency (observed in 2.5% of cases). In a clinically annotated subset of 118 patients, we validate actionable genetic events as therapeutic targets. Collectively, our findings reveal the genetic landscape of human sarcomas, which may inform future development of therapeutics and improve clinical outcomes for patients with these rare cancers., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The genetic, biologic, and clinical heterogeneity of sarcomas poses a challenge for the identification of therapeutic targets, clinical research, and advancing patient care. Because there are > 100 sarcoma subtypes, in-depth genetic studies have focused on one or a few subtypes. Herein, we report a comparative genetic analysis of 2,138 sarcomas representing 45 pathological entities. This cohort is prospectively analyzed using targeted sequencing to characterize subtype-specific somatic alterations in targetable pathways, rates of whole genome doubling, mutational signatures, and subtype-agnostic genomic clusters. The most common alterations are in cell cycle control and TP53, receptor tyrosine kinases/PI3K/RAS, and epigenetic regulators. Subtype-specific associations include TERT amplification in intimal sarcoma and SWI/SNF alterations in uterine adenosarcoma. Tumor mutational burden, while low compared to other cancers, varies between and within subtypes. This resource will improve sarcoma models, motivate studies of subtype-specific alterations, and inform investigations of genetic factors and their correlations with treatment response., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for surveillance imaging in patients treated for stage III Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Methods: This retrospective study included 61 consecutive stage III MCC patients who were clinically asymptomatic and underwent surveillance 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Findings were correlated with either pathology or clinical/imaging follow-up. The median follow-up period was 4.8 y. Statistical analyses were performed. Results: 18 F-FDG PET/CT detected unsuspected recurrences in 33% patients (20/61) with lesion-based sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. The mean ± SD SUV for malignant and benign lesions was 7.5 ± 3.9 and 3.8 ± 2.0, respectively. Unknown distant metastases, as first recurrence site, were noted in 12 of 61 patients. Those with positive disease on 18 F-FDG PET/CT within 1 y of definitive treatment had relatively worse overall survival ( P < 0.0001). After adjustment on stage, risk of death increased with a higher SUV max (hazard ratio for 1 unit = 1.17; P = 0.006) and with a higher number of positive lesions on 18 F-FDG PET/CT (hazard ratio for 1 additional lesion = 1.60; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Postdefinitive treatment surveillance 18 F-FDG PET/CT scanning detects unsuspected recurrences and has prognostic value. Inclusion of 18 F-FDG PET/CT within the first 6 mo after definitive treatment would be appropriate for surveillance and early detection of recurrence. Our data merit further studies to evaluate the prognostic implications., (© 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Purpose: Because the Hedgehog and Notch pathways are often overexpressed in mesenchymal malignancies, we evaluated the efficacy of concurrent inhibition of Notch and Hedgehog signaling using the gamma-secretase inhibitor (GSI) RO4929097 and the smoothened antagonist vismodegib in unresectable or metastatic sarcoma., Patients and Methods: In this investigator-initiated trial, phase Ib used standard 3+3 dose escalation in which patients first received vismodegib once daily for 21 days, followed by the combination of RO4929097 concurrently with vismodegib in 21-day cycles. In phase II, patients were randomized to RO4929097 alone or in combination with vismodegib., Results: Nine patients were treated in phase Ib with no dose-limiting toxicities. RO4929097 at 15 mg daily in combination with 150 mg daily of vismodegib was declared the recommended phase II dose. Most adverse events were grade ≤ 2. In phase II (closed early due to discontinuation of RO4929097 evaluation), 34 patients were randomized to RO4929097 alone and 33 to RO4929097 plus vismodegib. RO4929097 did not interfere with the steady-state concentration of vismodegib, while vismodegib reduced the plasma concentration of RO492909. No patients had an objective response. Neither progression-free nor overall survival differed significantly between treatment arms. Paired tumor biopsies from a subset of patients demonstrated inhibition of cleaved Notch., Conclusions: The combination of RO4929097 plus vismodegib was generally well tolerated. Although accrual to this study was not completed, vismodegib did not meaningfully enhance the clinical efficacy of RO4929097 in an unplanned analysis. GSIs and GSIs plus vismodegib can inhibit intratumoral Notch and downstream phosphorylated Akt signaling., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: This phase Ib trial was designed to evaluate the safety and early efficacy signal of the combination of imatinib and binimetinib in patients with imatinib-resistant advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs)., Patients and Methods: This trial used a standard 3 + 3 design to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Additional patients were enrolled on an expansion cohort at the RP2D enriching for succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient GISTs to explore potential efficacy., Results: The trial enrolled nine patients in the dose-escalation cohort and 14 in the dose-expansion cohort including six with SDH-deficient GISTs. Imatinib 400 mg daily with binimetinib 45 mg twice daily was established as the RP2D. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was asymptomatic grade 4 creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation. The most common non-DLT grade 3/4 toxicity was asymptomatic CPK elevation (69.6%). Other common ≥grade 2 toxicities included peripheral edema (17.4%), acneiform rash (21.7%), anemia (30.4%), hypophosphatemia (39.1%), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increase (17.4%). Two serious adverse events occurred (grade 2 dropped head syndrome and grade 3 central retinal vein occlusion). No unexpected toxicities were observed. Limited clinical activity was observed in KIT-mutant GIST. For SDH-deficient GISTs, one of five had confirmed RECIST1.1 partial response (PR). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) in patients with SDH-deficient GIST was 45.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 15.8-not estimable (NE)]; the median overall survival (mOS) was not reached (95% CI, 31.6 months-NE). One patient with a refractory metastatic SDH-deficient GIST had an exceptional pathologic response and durable clinical benefit., Conclusions: The combination of imatinib and binimetinib is safe with manageable toxicity and has encouraging activity in SDH-deficient but not imatinib-refractory KIT/PDGFRA-mutant GISTs. The observed clinical benefits provide a motivation for a larger trial of the combination strategy in SDH-deficient GISTs., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Dual targeting of the gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) lineage-specific master regulators, ETV1 and KIT, by MEK and KIT inhibitors were synergistic preclinically and may enhance clinical efficacy. This trial was designed to test the efficacy and safety of imatinib plus binimetinib in first-line treatment of GIST., Methods: In this trial (NCT01991379), treatment-naive adult patients with confirmed advanced GISTs received imatinib (400 mg once daily) plus binimetinib (30 mg twice daily), 28-day cycles. The primary end point was RECIST1.1 best objective response rate (ORR; complete response plus partial response [PR]). The study was designed to detect a 20% improvement in the ORR over imatinib alone (unacceptable rate of 45%; acceptable rate of 65%), using an exact binomial test, one-sided type I error of 0.08 and type II error of 0.1, and a planned sample size of 44 patients. Confirmed PR or complete response in > 24 patients are considered positive. Secondary end points included Choi and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Response Rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), pathologic responses, and toxicity., Results: Between September 15, 2014, and November 15, 2020, 29 of 42 evaluable patients with advanced GIST had confirmed RECIST1.1 PR. The best ORR was 69.0% (two-sided 95% CI, 52.9 to 82.4). Thirty-nine of 41 (95.1%) had Choi PR approximately 8 weeks. Median PFS was 29.9 months (95% CI, 24.2 to not estimable); median OS was not reached (95% CI, 50.4 to not estimable). Five of eight patients with locally advanced disease underwent surgery after treatment and achieved significant pathologic response (≥ 90% treatment effect). There were no unexpected toxicities. Grade 3 and 4 toxicity included asymptomatic creatinine phosphokinase elevation (79.1%), hypophosphatemia (14.0%), neutrophil decrease (9.3%), maculopapular rash (7.0%), and anemia (7.0%)., Conclusion: The study met the primary end point. The combination of imatinib and binimetinib is effective with manageable toxicity and warrants further evaluation in direct comparison with imatinib in frontline treatment of GIST., Competing Interests: Ping ChiStock and Other Ownership Interests: ORIC Pharmaceuticals (I)Consulting or Advisory Role: Deciphera, Exelixis, Merck (I)Research Funding: Deciphera (Inst), Pfizer (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Royalties from ORIC (I) Li-Xuan QinThis author is a member of the Journal of Clinical Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.Employment: Viela Bio (I), Sironax (I)Leadership: Viela Bio (I), Sironax (I)Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Viela Bio (I), Sironax (I) Bastien NguyenEmployment: Loxo/Lilly Ciara M. KellyEmployment: Daichii Sankyo (I)Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Daichii Sankyo (I)Consulting or Advisory Role: Exicure, ImmunicumResearch Funding: AGIOS (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Merck (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Kartos Therapeutics (Inst), Exicure (Inst), Xencor (Inst) Sandra P. D'AngeloConsulting or Advisory Role: EMD Serono, Amgen, Nektar, Immune design, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Merck, Adaptimmune, ImmunocoreResearch Funding: EMD Serono (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Merck (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Nektar (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Deciphera (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Adaptimmune, EMD Serono, Nektar Mark A. DicksonConsulting or Advisory Role: CelgeneResearch Funding: Lilly (Inst), AADi (Inst) Mrinal M. GounderHonoraria: Flatiron Health, PER, Medscape, Guidepoint Global, touchIME, Med Learning Group, More Health, PERConsulting or Advisory Role: Daiichi Sankyo, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Epizyme, Bayer, Springworks Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, TYME, Ayala PharmaceuticalsSpeakers' Bureau: Amgen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Boehringer IngelheimPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: UpToDate, GODDESS PRO Desmoid Tumor (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: EpizymeOther Relationship: Desmoid Tumor Research FoundationUncompensated Relationships: Foundation Medicine, Rain Therapeutics, AthenexOpen Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/459583 Sujana MovvaConsulting or Advisory Role: GenmabResearch Funding: Hutchison MediPharma (Inst) Benjamin A. NacevUncompensated Relationships: Delfi Diagnostics, Rapafusyn Pharmaceuticals, QuadW Foundation Katherine A. ThorntonConsulting or Advisory Role: More Health, Adaptimmune, Macrogenics, Deloitte, GlaxoSmithKline, EpizymeTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Adaptimmune Aimee M. CragoStock and Other Ownership Interests: Gilead SciencesHonoraria: Wolters Kluwer, WebMDConsulting or Advisory Role: Springworks TherapeuticsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent assigned to MSKCC for a companion diagnostic to CDK4 inhibitors—Patent number 9,889,135 (Inst) Sam YoonStock and Other Ownership Interests: Attis Lab Gary UlanerConsulting or Advisory Role: GE Healthcare, ImaginAbSpeakers' Bureau: GE HealthcareResearch Funding: Sanofi, Genentech, Puma Biotechnology, GE Healthcare, Lantheus Medical ImagingExpert Testimony: GE Healthcare Michael F. BergerConsulting or Advisory Role: Lilly, PetDxResearch Funding: GrailPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Provisional patent pending for Systems and Methods for Detecting Cancer via cfDNA Screening Yu ChenStock and Other Ownership Interests: ORIC PharmaceuticalsHonoraria: MerckPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Invention related to glucocorticoid inhibitors for treatment of prostate cancer (SK2013-045), Invention related to glucocorticoid inhibitors for treatment of prostate cancer (SK2013-045) William D. TapLeadership: Certis Oncology Solutions, Atropos, Innova TherapeuticsStock and Other Ownership Interests: Certis Oncology Solutions, AtroposConsulting or Advisory Role: EMD Serono, Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, C4 Therapeutics, Mundipharma, Adcendo, Ayala Pharmaceuticals, Kowa Pharmaceutical, Servier, Bayer, Epizyme, Cogent, Medpacto, Foghorn Therapeutics, AmgenResearch Funding: Novartis, Lilly, Plexxikon, Daiichi Sankyo, TRACON Pharma, Blueprint Medicines, Immune Design, BioAtla, DecipheraPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Companion Diagnostic for CDK4 inhibitors—14/854,329, Enigma and CDH18 as companion Diagnostics for CDK4 inhibition SKI2016-021-03No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Purpose: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade can mediate objective responses in advanced sarcomas, but their durability has not been established and it is unclear if hyperprogressive disease (HPD) occurs in sarcomas treated with PD-1 inhibitors., Experimental Design: We pooled patients who were treated prospectively with nivolumab or pembrolizumab as monotherapy or with bempegaldesleukin, epacadostat, ipilimumab, or talimogene laherparepvec. We did a new independent assessment for HPD and analyzed clinical, pathologic, and genomic data from baseline tumor biopsies. Our primary endpoint was the incidence of HPD; secondary endpoints were clinical or genomic correlates of response or HPD., Results: We treated 134 patients with advanced sarcoma from 2015 to 2019. Twenty-one patients (16%) had a complete or partial response (CR/PR), and 30% of responses were durable for over 2 years. Forty-eight (36%) patients had stable disease (SD), 45 (34%) had progressive disease without HPD (PD), and 15 (11%) had HPD. Five patients (4%) were not evaluable for HPD. The sarcoma subtypes, sites of metastasis, clinical course, and genomic alterations in patients with PD and HPD were similar, except HPD tumors were smaller at baseline., Conclusions: In patients with advanced sarcoma, PD-1 blockade can mediate durable responses. HPD occurs in sarcoma at an incidence that is similar to what has been reported in other solid tumors, but patients with HPD were clinically and biologically similar to those who had PD. Further research is required to establish whether HPD is a biologically distinct phenomenon and whether a theoretical risk of HPD should influence patient management., (©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may experience pseudoprogression, which can be classified as progressive disease (PD) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) V.1.1 and could lead to inappropriate treatment discontinuation. Immune-response criteria were developed to better capture novel response patterns seen with ICIs., Methods: We pooled data from 1765 patients with 12 types of advanced solid tumors treated with avelumab (an anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody) monotherapy in the JAVELIN Solid Tumor and JAVELIN Merkel 200 trials, conducted a comparative analysis of tumor assessments by investigators according to RECIST 1.1 and immune-related RECIST (irRECIST), and evaluated the correlation between progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: In total, 147 patients (8.3%) had a best overall response (BOR) of PD by RECIST 1.1 but had immune-related disease control by irRECIST (defined as immune-related BOR (irBOR) of immune-related stable disease or better). This discordance was seen irrespective of PD-L1 status and observed across all tumor types. Overall, PFS and immune-related PFS showed similar imputed rank correlations with OS., Conclusions: The use of irRECIST identified a subset of patients with a BOR of PD by RECIST 1.1 but an irBOR of immune-related disease control by irRECIST with a distinctive survival curve, thereby providing more clinically relevant information than RECIST 1.1 alone. However, as a surrogate endpoint for OS in the whole population, immune-related PFS by irRECIST did not show improved predictive value compared with PFS by RECIST 1.1., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JLG has received research funding from Astellas Medivation, Bavarian Nordic, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, NantBioScience, and Pfizer. SPD has provided consultancy or advisory services for Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Immune Design, Incyte, EMD Serono, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, and Nektar Therapeutics, and received travel expenses from Adaptimmune, EMD Serono, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, and Nektar Therapeutics. JM is an employee of EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA. SPE is an employee of Merck Serono Ltd., Feltham, UK, an affiliate of Merck KGaA. MB is an employee of Merck. All other authors report no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with primary and locally recurrent extra-abdominal desmoid tumors who underwent percutaneous cryoablation, and to compare with patients treated with surgery., Methods: Group characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact test, and propensity score matching was performed using the nearest-neighbor approach. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were used to evaluate the variation in first local recurrence and disease control, while multivariate Cox regression was used to identify factors associated with first local recurrence. All statistical tests were two-sided and a p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant., Results: Twenty-two cryoablation patients were matched with 33 surgical patients (n = 55). Median follow-up after cryoablation was 16.3 months versus 14.9 months after surgery. Two-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 59% after cryoablation and 71% after surgery, and median LRFS was 26.6 months after cryoablation but was not reached after surgery. Two-year disease control for all patients was 85%, however median disease control was not reached in either the cryoablation or surgery groups. There was no significant difference in LRFS or disease control between matched cryoablation and surgical patients. No local recurrences occurred after the first cryoablation in patients with zero or one of the following risk factors: tumor size > 5 cm, age ≤ 25 years, or locally recurrent disease. All patients with two or more of these risk factors recurred locally after the first cryoablation., Conclusion: Percutaneous cryoablation of primary and locally recurrent extra-abdominal desmoid tumors provides freedom from first local recurrence and long-term disease control comparable with surgery., (© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: Avelumab (anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)) is approved in multiple countries for the treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC), a rare and aggressive skin cancer. We report efficacy and safety data and exploratory biomarker analyses from a cohort of patients with mMCC treated with first-line avelumab in a phase II trial., Methods: Patients with treatment-naive mMCC received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was durable response, defined as objective response (complete or partial response; assessed by independent review) lasting ≥6 months. Additional assessments included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and biomarker analyses., Results: In 116 patients treated with avelumab, median follow-up was 21.2 months (range: 14.9-36.6). Thirty-five patients had a response lasting ≥6 months, giving a durable response rate of 30.2% (95% CI: 22.0% to 39.4%). The objective response rate was 39.7% (95% CI: 30.7% to 49.2%). Median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI: 1.4 to 6.1) and median OS was 20.3 months (95% CI: 12.4 to not estimable). Response rates were numerically higher in patients with PD-L1+ tumors, Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV)-negative tumors, and tumors with increased intratumoral CD8 + T-cell density. Exploratory analyses did not identify a biomarker that could reliably predict a response to first-line treatment with avelumab; however, a novel gene expression signature to identify the presence of MCPyV+ tumors was derived. Treatment-related adverse events (any grade) occurred in 94 (81.0%) patients, including grade 3/4 events in 21 (18.1%) patients; no treatment-related deaths occurred., Conclusion: In patients with mMCC, first-line treatment with avelumab led to responses in 40% and durable responses in 30%, and was associated with a low rate of grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Dr D’Angelo reports serving as a consultant or advisor for Amgen, EMD Serono (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), GlaxoSmithKline, Immune Design, Incyte, Merck & Co., and Nektar; received research grants from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Deciphera, EMD Serono, Incyte, Merck & Co., and Nektar; and received reimbursement for travel and accommodation expenses from Adaptimmune, EMD Serono, and Nektar. Dr Lebbé has received honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Merck & Co., Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, and Roche; reports serving as a consultant or advisor for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck & Co., Novartis, and Roche; is a member of a speakers bureau for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Roche; has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb and Roche; has received reimbursement for travel and accommodation expenses from Bristol Myers Squibb; and has other relationships with Avantis Medical Systems. Dr Mortier has received reimbursement for travel and accommodation expenses from Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Roche/Genentech. Dr Brohl reports serving as a consultant or advisor for Bayer, Deciphera, EMD Serono, and PierianDx. Dr Fazio has received honoraria from Ipsen and Novartis; reports serving as a consultant or advisor for Advanced Accelerator Applications, Ipsen, Merck KGaA, MSD Oncology, Novartis/Ipsen, and Pfizer; and has received research funding from Merck KGaA and Novartis. Dr Grob has received honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck KGaA, Merck & Co., Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Sanofi; reports serving as a consultant or advisor for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck KGaA, Merck & Co., Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Sanofi; is a member of a speakers’ bureau for Novartis; and has received reimbursement for travel and accommodation expenses from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck & Co., Novartis, and Pierre Fabre. Dr Prinzi has received reimbursement for travel and accommodation expenses from Novartis. Dr Hanna has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Exicure, GlaxoSmithKline, Kite Pharma, NantKwest/Altor BioScience, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, and Kartos Therapeutics; and reports receiving honoraria and serving as a consultant for Bio-Rad Laboratories, Bristol Myers Squibb, Kura Oncology, Maverick Therapeutics, Merck KGaA, Prelude Therapeutics, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals/Sanofi. Dr Hassel has received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck & Co., Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; reports serving as a consultant or advisor for Merck & Co. and Pierre Fabre; has received research funding from 4SC, Amgen, BioNTech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Immunocore, Novartis, Philogen, and Roche; and has received reimbursement for travel and accommodation expenses from Pierre Fabre. Dr Kiecker has received honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck & Co., Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and Roche; reports serving as a consultant or advisor for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Merck & Co., Novartis, and Roche; has received research funding from Novartis; and has received reimbursement for travel and accommodation expenses from Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis. Dr Georges reports employment at EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Ms Ellers-Lenz reports employment at Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Dr Shah reports employment at EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Dr Güzel reports employment at Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Dr Nghiem has received honoraria from EMD Serono and Merck & Co.; reports serving as a consultant or advisor for EMD Serono and Pfizer; has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb and EMD Serono; and has a pending patent for high-affinity T-cell receptors that target the Merkel cell polyomavirus., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is a highly malignant neoplasm arising from peripheral nerve or its attendant sheath and is derived from Schwann or pluripotent cells of neural crest origin. Patients with recurrent, unresectable, or advanced stage disease have limited treatment options, and current therapies are associated with little benefit. In this article, we report nine cases of MPNST treated with selinexor, an orally bioavailable, selective inhibitor of nuclear export, accompanied by tumor stabilization or regression., (© 2021 AlphaMed Press.)

Background and Objective: Avelumab is approved for the treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma, a rare aggressive skin cancer with a poor prognosis. The aim of this qualitative study embedded in a clinical trial was to explore patient experiences while receiving avelumab., Methods: All treatment-naïve patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma entering part B of the phase II, open-label, international, JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial (NCT02155647) were invited to participate in optional semi-structured phone interviews before avelumab administration (baseline) and at weeks 13 and 25. Interviews were conducted by trained professionals, audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed. Key concepts identified at baseline were assessed during follow-up interviews., Results: Twenty-nine patients completed the baseline interview; 19 had at least one follow-up interview. Baseline interviews described the patients' challenging journeys before being correctly diagnosed with Merkel cell carcinoma, the negative psychological burden of living with a symptomless disease and the hope for avelumab to be a successful therapy. During the trial, most patients reported an increased or continued sense of hope and willingness to fight metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Patients who self-reported disease improvement (n = 12) also reported stability or improvement in physical well-being and ability to do daily activities, having more energy, worrying less and being optimistic. Six patients who reported their condition as stable (n = 4) or worsened (n = 3) reported a worsening of physical well-being. Nine patients reported fatigue/tiredness on the day of and after receiving avelumab. Baseline and longitudinal experiences were similar across countries., Conclusions: This study suggests that patients experience perceptible benefits in physical and psychological well-being following treatment success with first-line avelumab in metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma.

Background Preclinical studies suggest that imatinib resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) can be mediated by MAP-kinase activation via fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling. In FGF stimulated GIST cell lines, BGJ398, a pan-FGFR kinase inhibitor in combination with imatinib, was cytotoxic and superior to imatinib therapy alone. In FGF-dependent GIST, the combination of BGJ398 and imatinib may provide a mechanism to overcome imatinib resistance. Methods This phase Ib study of BGJ398 and imatinib was performed in patients with imatinib refractory advanced GIST. A standard 3 + 3 dosing schema was utilized to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Two treatment schedules were evaluated incorporating imatinib 400 mg daily in combination with (A) BGJ398 daily 3 weeks on, 1 week off or (B) BGJ398 daily 1 week on, 3 weeks off. Results 16 patients enrolled. The median age was 54 years (range: 44-77), 81% were male, and the median number of lines of prior therapy was 4 [range: 2-6, 13 patients had ≥3 prior therapies]. 12 patients received treatment on schedule A [BGJ398 dose range: 25 - 75 mg]: 2 patients experienced dose limiting toxicities (DLT) (n = 1, myocardial infarction & grade (G)4 CPK elevation; n = 1, G3 ALT elevation) on schedule A (BGJ398 75 mg), significant hyperphosphatemia, an on-target effect, was not observed, implying the maximum tolerated dose was below the therapeutic dose. Following protocol amendment, 4 patients enrolled on schedule B [BGJ398 dose range: 75 - 100 mg]: no DLTs were observed. The most common treatment related adverse events occurring in >15% of patients included CPK elevation (50%), lipase elevation (44%), hyperphosphatemia (24%), anemia (19%), and peripheral edema (19%). Among the 12 evaluable patients, stable disease (SD) was the best response observed in 7 patients by RECIST v1.1 and 9 patients by CHOI. Stable disease ≥ 32 weeks was observed in 3 patients (25%). Median progression free survival was 12.1 weeks (95% CI 4.7-19.5 weeks). Conclusions Toxicity was encountered with the combination therapy of BGJ398 and imatinib. Due to withdrawal of sponsor support the study closed before the RP2D or dosing schedule of the combination therapy was identified. In heavily pre-treated patients, stable disease ≥ 32 weeks was observed in 3 of 12 evaluable patients. Trial Registration: NCT02257541 .

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatments benefit some patients with metastatic cancers, but predictive biomarkers are needed. Findings in selected cancer types suggest that tumor mutational burden (TMB) may predict clinical response to ICI. To examine this association more broadly, we analyzed the clinical and genomic data of 1,662 advanced cancer patients treated with ICI, and 5,371 non-ICI-treated patients, whose tumors underwent targeted next-generation sequencing (MSK-IMPACT). Among all patients, higher somatic TMB (highest 20% in each histology) was associated with better overall survival. For most cancer histologies, an association between higher TMB and improved survival was observed. The TMB cutpoints associated with improved survival varied markedly between cancer types. These data indicate that TMB is associated with improved survival in patients receiving ICI across a wide variety of cancer types, but that there may not be one universal definition of high TMB.

Importance: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive skin cancer that is associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with distant metastatic disease. Results of part A of the JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial (avelumab in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma) showed that avelumab, an anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, demonstrated efficacy in second-line or later treatment of patients with metastatic MCC (mMCC)., Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of avelumab as first-line treatment for patients with distant mMCC., Design, Setting, and Participants: JAVELIN Merkel 200 part B is an international, multicenter, single-arm, open-label clinical trial of first-line avelumab monotherapy. Eligible patients were adults with mMCC who had not received prior systemic treatment for metastatic disease. Patients were not selected for PD-L1 expression or Merkel cell polyomavirus status. Data were collected from April 15, 2016, to March 24, 2017, and enrollment is ongoing., Interventions: Patients received avelumab, 10 mg/kg, by 1-hour intravenous infusion every 2 weeks until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal occurred., Main Outcomes and Measures: Tumor status was assessed every 6 weeks and evaluated by independent review committee per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The primary end point was durable response, defined as an objective response with a duration of at least 6 months. Secondary end points include best overall response, duration of response, progression-free survival, safety, and tolerability., Results: As of March 24, 2017, 39 patients were enrolled (30 men and 9 women; median age, 75 years [range, 47-88 years]), with a median follow-up of 5.1 months (range, 0.3-11.3 months). In a preplanned analysis, efficacy was assessed in 29 patients with at least 3 months of follow-up; the confirmed objective response rate was 62.1% (95% CI, 42.3%-79.3%), with 14 of 18 responses (77.8%) ongoing at the time of analysis. In responding patients, the estimated proportion with duration of response of at least 3 months was 93% (95% CI, 61%-99%); duration of response of at least 6 months, 83% (95% CI, 46%-96%). First-line avelumab treatment was generally well tolerated, and no treatment-related deaths or grade 4 adverse events occurred., Conclusions and Relevance: High rates of response to first-line avelumab therapy in patients with distant mMCC build on previously reported antitumor activity after second-line or later treatment, and maturing progression-free survival data suggest that responses are durable. These data further support avelumab's approval in the United States and European Union and use as a standard-of-care treatment for mMCC., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02155647.

We evaluated the safety and activity of autologous T cells expressing NY-ESO-1 c259 , an affinity-enhanced T-cell receptor (TCR) recognizing an HLA-A2-restricted NY-ESO-1/LAGE1a-derived peptide, in patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma (NY-ESO-1 c259 T cells). Confirmed antitumor responses occurred in 50% of patients (6/12) and were characterized by tumor shrinkage over several months. Circulating NY-ESO-1 c259 T cells were present postinfusion in all patients and persisted for at least 6 months in all responders. Most of the infused NY-ESO-1 c259 T cells exhibited an effector memory phenotype following ex vivo expansion, but the persisting pools comprised largely central memory and stem-cell memory subsets, which remained polyfunctional and showed no evidence of T-cell exhaustion despite persistent tumor burdens. Next-generation sequencing of endogenous TCRs in CD8 + NY-ESO-1 c259 T cells revealed clonal diversity without contraction over time. These data suggest that regenerative pools of NY-ESO-1 c259 T cells produced a continuing supply of effector cells to mediate sustained, clinically meaningful antitumor effects. Significance: Metastatic synovial sarcoma is incurable with standard therapy. We employed engineered T cells targeting NY-ESO-1, and the data suggest that robust, self-regenerating pools of CD8 + NY-ESO-1 c259 T cells produce a continuing supply of effector cells over several months that mediate clinically meaningful antitumor effects despite prolonged exposure to antigen. Cancer Discov; 8(8); 944-57. ©2018 AACR. See related commentary by Keung and Tawbi, p. 914 This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 899 ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Objectives Ontuxizumab (MORAB-004) is a first-in-class monoclonal antibody that interferes with endosialin function, which is important in tumor stromal cell function, angiogenesis, and tumor growth. This Phase 2 study evaluated the 24-week progression-free survival (PFS) value, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability of 2 doses of ontuxizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients and methods Patients with metastatic melanoma and disease progression after receiving at least 1 prior systemic treatment were randomized to receive ontuxizumab (2 or 4 mg/kg) weekly, without dose change, until disease progression. Results Seventy-six patients received at least 1 dose of ontuxizumab (40 received 2 mg/kg, 36 received 4 mg/kg). The primary endpoint, 24-week PFS value, was 11.4% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 5.3%-19.9%) for all patients (13.5% for 2 mg/kg and 8.9% for 4 mg/kg). The median PFS for all patients was 8.3 weeks (95% CI: 8.1-12.3 weeks). One patient receiving 4 mg/kg had a partial response, as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Twenty-seven of 66 response evaluable patients (40.9%) had stable disease. The median overall survival was 31.0 weeks (95% CI: 28.3-44.0 weeks). The most common adverse events overall were headache (55.3%), fatigue (48.7%), chills (42.1%), and nausea (36.8%), mostly grade 1 or 2. Conclusions Ontuxizumab at both doses was well tolerated. The 24-week PFS value was 11.4% among all ontuxizumab-treated patients. The overall response rate was 3.1% at the 4 mg/kg dose, with clinical benefit achieved in 42.4% of response evaluable patients. Efficacy of single-agent ontuxizumab at these doses in melanoma was low.

Sarcomas are a rare group of malignant tumors of mesenchymal origin that comprise 1% of all adult cancers. Despite initial surgery, distant metastatic disease will develop in approximately 25% of patients, and standard chemotherapy has limited durable efficacy. There is a dire need for more effective and less toxic therapies for the treatment of metastatic sarcoma. The immune system plays a major role in cancer control and progression. There have been tremendous breakthroughs in other malignancies by manipulating the immune system with checkpoint inhibitors. These agents, either alone or in combination with other approaches such as radiation, chemotherapy, targeted agents, or immunotherapeutics, have generally led to improved efficacy in selected malignancies thus far. Although promising, these drugs can cause specific immune-related adverse events that require prompt recognition and treatment. In addition, characterizing response and progression radiographically has become somewhat more challenging. Identifying predictive biomarkers of benefit will be essential. There remains optimism and hope that the strides made in other cancers will be emulated in sarcoma.

Introduction: Angiosarcomas are rare malignant endothelial cell tumors which have up-regulation of the angiopoietin system [e.g., Tie2 and Angiopoietin 2 (Ang2)]. Trebananib is a novel agent targeting Angiopoietin 1 and Angiopoietin 2., Methods: Trebananib 30 mg/kg was administered weekly until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was response rate by RECIST v1.1. Correlatives included: (1) baseline tumor expression of Ang2/Tie2 by immunohistochemistry, (2) serum levels of Ang1 and Ang2, (3) pre- and post-treatment phospho-receptor tyrosine kinase and (4) MYC/FLT-4 amplification status., Results: Sixteen patients were enrolled [median age 68 years (24-91), 38 % male, median number of prior therapies 2.5 (1-7)]. No responses were observed in 12 evaluable patients. Estimated median and 12-week progression-free survival rate were 7 weeks (95 % 6-8) and 25 % (95 % CI 11-58 %), respectively. Median overall survival was 28 weeks (95 % CI 17-48). There were two (12.5 %) patients who experienced grade 3 adverse event and one (6.3 %) patient who experienced grade 4 adverse event that was considered at least possibly related to treatment., Conclusions: Trebananib was well tolerated. Lack of response in the first stage of a Simon 2 stage design led to closure of this study. Prolonged PFS was observed in four pts, lasting 3.4-5.5 months.

Objective: The genes KRAS and EGFR have emerged as potential targets for therapy in lung adenocarcinoma; mutations in these genes can be found in almost half of patients. In anticipation of the clinical importance of molecularly defined adenocarcinoma subgroups for the treatment of patients with resected stages I through III lung adenocarcinoma, the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) Departments of Surgery and Pathology have collaborated since 2006 to conduct reflex testing of tumor specimens for EGFR and KRAS mutations., Methods: Using established methods, the identification of EGFR exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R mutations was performed. In samples lacking these 2 sensitizing EGFR mutations, KRAS analysis was done., Results: We studied a total of 1831 patients who had stage I through IV lung adenocarcinomas and detected 448 KRAS and 364 EGFR mutations. Of these patients, a subset of 855 (78%) patients with stages I through III adenocarcinoma of the lung who underwent curative surgical resection at MSKCC were tested. In patients with early stage disease, 158 EGFR mutations and 207 KRAS mutations were detected., Conclusions: The results of the first 3 years of reflex testing at MSKCC reported here demonstrate the feasibility, clinical utility, and potential of this approach. This information allowed for enrollment of patients into clinical trials to explore mutation-specific, directed therapy and led to retrospective studies related to patient outcome. In addition, it may inform selection of chemotherapy for recurrent disease and may help to distinguish multiple primary tumors from metastatic disease., (Published by Mosby, Inc.)