Search

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin compared with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) in diabetic patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Background: Prior studies have demonstrated that GPI are especially beneficial in patients with diabetes with acute coronary syndromes and/or those undergoing PCI., Methods: In the multicenter, prospective HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes with RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial, 3,602 patients with STEMI were randomized to bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin plus a GPI. Clinical outcomes were analyzed at 30 days and 1 year in patients with diabetes., Results: Diabetes mellitus was present in 593 patients (16.5%). The rates of cardiac death were significantly lower in diabetic patients treated with bivalirudin compared with heparin plus GPI (30 days: 2.1% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.04; 1 year: 2.5% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.01), and bivalirudin resulted in lower 30-day rates of stroke (0% vs. 2%, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences among diabetic patients randomized to bivalirudin versus heparin plus GPI in the 1-year rates of major adverse cardiac events (14.2% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.44), major bleeding (8.7% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.42), or stent thrombosis (4.2% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.85). By interaction testing, the relative effects of bivalirudin compared with heparin plus GPI were not significantly different in patients with and without diabetes., Conclusions: In patients with diabetes mellitus presenting with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, anticoagulant therapy with bivalirudin compared with heparin plus GPI is safe and effective and might reduce cardiac mortality at 30 days and 1 year. (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction; NCT00433966)., (Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We assessed the in vivo vascular response to a new generation of zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) with prolonged drug release (Resolute ZES-SR, Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, California) compared with ZES with faster kinetics (Endeavor ZES-FR, Medtronic Vascular) by optical coherence tomography., Background: Local drug release kinetics has been implicated with antirestenosis efficacy of drug-eluting stents. However, the impact of different release kinetics on vascular response of diseased human coronary arteries remains to be investigated., Methods: The study population consisted of 43 patients with long lesions in native coronary vessels treated with multiple overlapping ZES. Twenty-one patients treated with ZES-SR were compared with 22 patients treated with ZES-FR from the ODESSA (Optical coherence tomography for DES SAfety) study. The primary endpoint was in-stent neointimal hyperplasia as assessed by optical coherence tomography at 6-month follow-up. Coprimary endpoints were the percentage of uncovered and malapposed struts., Results: Strut-level median neointimal thickness was 0.11 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.07 to 0.15 mm) in ZES-SR and 0.31 mm (IQR: 0.27 to 0.42 mm) in ZES-FR, respectively (p < 0.001). The 6-month rate of uncovered struts per patient was 7.38% (IQR: 3.06% to 12.72%) in ZES-SR and 0.00% (IQR: 0.00% to 0.00%) in ZES-FR (p < 0.001); rate of malapposed and uncovered struts was 1.47% (IQR: 0.32% to 4.23%) in ZES-SR and 0.00% (IQR: 0.00% to 0.00%) in ZES-FR (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: This study demonstrated the impact of different release kinetics on human in vivo vascular response to ZES implantation. The new generation of ZES-SR compared with ZES-FR had better suppression of the neointimal response but higher proportion of uncovered and malapposed struts at 6-month optical coherence tomography follow-up. (Optical Coherence Tomography in Long Lesions [LongOCT]; NCT01133925)., (Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Primary results of the HORIZONS-AMI trial have been previously reported. In this final report, we aimed to assess 3-year outcomes., Methods: HORIZONS-AMI was a prospective, open-label, randomised trial undertaken at 123 institutions in 11 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older were eligible for enrolment if they had ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), presented within 12 h after onset of symptoms, and were undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. By use of a computerised interactive voice response system, we randomly allocated patients 1:1 to receive bivalirudin or heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI; pharmacological randomisation; stratified by previous and expected drug use and study site) and, if eligible, randomly allocated 3:1 to receive a paclitaxel-eluting stent or a bare metal stent (stent randomisation; stratified by pharmacological group assignment, diabetes mellitus status, lesion length, and study site). We produced Kaplan-Meier estimates of major adverse cardiovascular events at 3 years by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00433966., Findings: Compared with 1802 patients allocated to receive heparin plus a GPI, 1800 patients allocated to bivalirudin monotherapy had lower rates of all-cause mortality (5·9%vs 7·7%, difference -1·9% [-3·5 to -0·2], HR 0·75 [0·58-0·97]; p=0·03), cardiac mortality (2·9%vs 5·1%, -2·2% [-3·5 to -0·9], 0·56 [0·40-0·80]; p=0·001), reinfarction (6·2%vs 8·2%, -1·9% [-3·7 to -0·2], 0·76 [0·59-0·99]; p=0·04), and major bleeding not related to bypass graft surgery (6·9%vs 10·5%, -3·6% [-5·5 to -1·7], 0·64 [0·51-0·80]; p=0·0001) at 3 years, with no significant differences in ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularisation, stent thrombosis, or composite adverse events. Compared with 749 patients who received a bare-metal stent, 2257 patients who received a paclitaxel-eluting stent had lower rates of ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation (9·4%vs 15·1%, -5·7% [-8·6 to -2·7], 0·60 [0·48-0·76]; p<0·0001) after 3 years, with no significant differences in the rates of death, reinfarction, stroke or stent thrombosis. Stent thrombosis was high (≥4·5%) in both groups., Interpretation: The effectiveness and safety of bivalirudin monotherapy and paclitaxel-eluting stenting are sustained at 3 years for patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention., Funding: Boston Scientific and The Medicines Company., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The relationship between white blood cell count (WBCc) and mortality in patients with ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention is poorly understood. Furthermore, whether there is a relationship between WBCc and risk of noncardiac mortality and bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention is unknown., Methods and Results: The baseline WBCc was available in 3193 of 3345 patients (95.5%) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention in the Harmonizing Outcome With Revascularization and Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial. In a propensity-adjusted multivariable analysis, WBCc was an independent predictor of 1-year cardiac mortality (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 1.22), noncardiac mortality (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 1.29), and major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.12). After adjustment for baseline creatinine phosphokinase levels and left ventricular ejection fraction, WBCc remained an independent predictor of 1-year all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. In patients matched for baseline creatinine phosphokinase levels at hospital admission, the median peak creatinine phosphokinase level was significantly higher in patients with high WBCc (>11 000 per 1 mm(3)) compared with low WBCc (1851 U/L [range, 880-3307 U/L] versus 1241 U/L [range, 540 to 2,78], respectively; P<0.0001). In this subgroup of patients, WBCc was an independent correlate of peak creatinine phosphokinase level, and remained an independent predictor of 1-year mortality., Conclusions: In patients with ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, elevated baseline WBCc is an independent predictor of infarct size, as assessed by peak creatinine phosphokinase level, and of 1-year cardiac mortality, noncardiac mortality, and major bleeding.

Objectives: We investigated the outcomes of switching to bivalirudin after initial administration of heparin in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention., Background: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is frequently administered early in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Whether the benefits of bivalirudin documented in the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial persist in patients previously administered UFH is unknown., Methods: We analyzed the outcomes of the 2,357 patients from HORIZONS-AMI treated with UFH before enrollment according to their subsequent randomization to bivalirudin (switch group, n = 1,178) or UFH plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (control group, n = 1,179)., Results: At 30 days, major bleeding occurred in 7.6% of the switch group versus 12.3% of the control group (p = 0.0001). Switch patients had lower 30-day rates of cardiac mortality (1.6% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.04). At 2-year follow-up, switch patients experienced lower rates of major bleeding (8.4% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.0003), cardiac mortality (2.3% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.04), and reinfarction (4.0% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.0002). Two-year rates of definite/probable stent thrombosis were similar in switch and control patients (3.1% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.17)., Conclusions: In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients who receive early treatment with UFH, switching to bivalirudin before primary percutaneous coronary intervention results in reduced rates of major bleeding and improved early and late cardiac survival., (Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Small stent area and residual inflow/outflow disease have been reported as the strongest intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) predictors of early stent thrombosis (ST) in patients with stable angina. IVUS predictors of early ST in patients with acute myocardial infarction have not been studied., Methods and Results: In the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) study, a formal substudy included poststent and 13-month follow-up IVUS at 36 centers. Twelve patients with baseline IVUS who had definite/probable early ST ≤30 days after enrollment were compared with 389 patients without early ST. Significant residual stenosis was a lumen area <4.0 mm(2) with ≥70% plaque burden ≤10 mm from each stent edge. Significant edge dissection was more than medial dissection with lumen area <4 mm(2) or dissection angle ≥60°. Randomization to bivalirudin (P=0.29) or paclitaxel-eluting stent (P=0.74) was not related to early ST. Minimum lumen area was smaller in patients with versus without early ST (4.4 mm(2) [3.6, 6.9] versus 6.7 mm(2) [5.3, 8.0], respectively, P=0.014). Minimum lumen area <5 mm(2), significant residual stenosis, significant stent edge dissection, and significant tissue (plaque/thrombus) protrusion (more than the median that narrowed the lumen to <4 mm(2)) were more prevalent in patients with early ST, but significant acute malapposition (more than the median) was not. Overall, 100% of patients with early ST had at least 1 of these significant features: minimum lumen area <5 mm(2), edge dissection, residual stenosis, or tissue protrusion versus 23% in patients without early ST (P<0.01)., Conclusions: Smaller final lumen area and inflow/outflow disease (residual stenosis or dissection) but not acute malapposition were related to early ST after acute myocardial infarction intervention., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00433966.

Objective: A pharmacodynamic interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has been suggested, leading to reduced clopidogrel-induced platelet inhibitory effects. However, data from clinical studies are conflicting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of long-term clopidogrel and PPI therapy., Methods: A total of 1328 consecutive patients (age 63±11 years; 81% male) undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation and 1-year follow-up were included. All patients were treated with a standard aspirin and clopidogrel treatment regimen for 12 months. The concomitant PPI therapy for the same duration was at the discretion of the clinical cardiologist. PPI therapy included lansoprazole (30 mg/day), pantoprazole (20 mg/day), or omeprazole (20 mg/day). At 1-year follow-up, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome leading to hospitalization and nonfatal stroke, were recorded. All cause death, any stent thrombosis (ST), and bleeding (Thrombolysis in MI major and minor) were also assessed., Results: Lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and omeprazole were administered to 855, 178, and 125 patients, whereas 170 were not prescribed any PPI therapy. Among patients treated with PPIs, those on pantoprazole had more often prior MI, multivessel coronary artery disease, and chronic kidney disease, whereas earlier peptic ulcer was more frequent among patients treated with omeprazole. The incidence of 1-year MACE was not statistically different between patients in the PPI and no-PPI groups (7.5 vs. 5.0%; P=0.26). Similarly, 1-year rates of all cause death, ST, and Thrombolysis in MI major and minor bleedings did not significantly differ. After statistical adjustment for potential confounders, the concomitant use of clopidogrel and PPIs was not associated with the risk of 1-year MACE [odds ratio (OR) 1.54, P=0.38], death (OR: 0.97, P=0.961), and ST (OR: 1.01, P=0.998). No differences across the three PPI types were found., Conclusion: The association of clopidogrel and PPIs after drug-eluting stent implantation, prescribed on clinical judgement, seems safe.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to understand the impact of attenuated plaque on distal embolization during stent implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI)., Background: Attenuated plaques identified by grayscale intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) might predict transient deterioration in coronary flow and/or no-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: We analyzed clinical, angiographic, and IVUS data from 364 patients (n = 364 infarct-related arteries) enrolled in the randomized HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial. No-reflow was final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade ≤2 in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Attenuated plaque was hypoechoic or mixed atheroma with ultrasound attenuation without calcification. A mean attenuation score was created by measuring the angle of attenuation each 1 mm, scoring the angle as 1 to 4 (corresponding to <90°, 90° to 180°, 180° to 270°, or 270° to 360°, respectively), summing the scores, and normalizing for analysis length., Results: Overall, 284 (78.0%) patients had attenuated plaques; no-reflow occurred in 37 (10.2%). Patients with no-reflow had a higher mean attenuation score (median [interquartile range] 2.2 [0.0 to 2.8] vs. 1.3 [0.7 to 1.8], p < 0.001), lower baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (52.8% [43.2% to 61.5%] vs. 61.4% [52.2% to 68.1%], p = 0.002), and more baseline angiographic thrombus (89.2% vs. 74.1%, p = 0.043) with no differences in post-PCI stent expansion versus patients without no-reflow. Multivariate analysis indicated that mean attenuation score was the strongest predictor of no-reflow. The mean attenuation score that best predicted no-reflow was ≥2 points (90° to 180°, sensitivity of 81.5%, and specificity of 80.5%)., Conclusions: Attenuated plaque was present in three-quarters of patients with AMI. The amount of attenuated plaque strongly correlated with no-reflow; the larger the attenuated plaque, the greater the likelihood of no-reflow. (Dual Arm Factorial Randomized Trial in Patients w/ST Segment Elevation AMI to Compare the Results of Using Anticoagulation With Either Unfractionated Heparin + Routine GP IIb/IIIa Inhibition or Bivalirudin + Bail-out GP IIb/IIIa Inhibition; and Primary Angioplasty with stent implantation with Either a Slow Rate-release Paclitaxel-eluting Stent [TAXUS™] or Uncoated Bare Metal Stent [EXPRESS2™]; NCT00433966)., (Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Concerns persist regarding the risk of stent thrombosis in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction., Methods and Results: The Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial included 3602 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention who were randomized to heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) (n=1802) versus bivalirudin monotherapy (n=1800). Stents were implanted in 3202 patients, including 2261 who received drug-eluting stents and 861 who received only bare metal stents. Definite or probable stent thrombosis within 2 years occurred in 137 patients (4.4%), including 28 acute events (0.9%), 49 subacute events (1.6%), 32 late events (1.0%), and 33 very late events (1.1%). The 2-year cumulative rates of stent thrombosis were 4.4% with both drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents (P=0.98) and 4.3% versus 4.6% in patients randomized to bivalirudin monotherapy versus heparin plus a GPI, respectively (P=0.73). Acute stent thrombosis occurred more frequently in patients assigned to bivalirudin compared with heparin plus a GPI (1.4% versus 0.3%; P<0.001), whereas stent thrombosis after 24 hours occurred less frequently in patients with bivalirudin compared with heparin plus a GPI (2.8% versus 4.4%; P=0.02). Pre-randomization heparin and a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose were independent predictors of reduced acute and subacute stent thrombosis, respectively., Conclusions: Stent thrombosis is not uncommon within the first 2 years after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and occurs with similar frequency in patients receiving drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents and bivalirudin alone versus heparin plus a GPI. Optimizing adjunct pharmacology including early antithrombin therapy preloading with a potent antiplatelet therapy may further reduce stent thrombosis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Background: In the prospective, randomized Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial, implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) safely reduced the rates of ischemic target lesion revascularization (TLR) compared with bare metal stents (BMS) in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous intervention. Diabetes mellitus is a known predictor of adverse outcomes after percutaneous intervention in STEMI. We therefore sought to assess the impact of PES in diabetic patients with STEMI from the HORIZONS-AMI trial., Methods and Results: A total of 478 patients with diabetes and 2527 without diabetes were randomly assigned to receive PES versus BMS. The 12-month rates of ischemic TLR were significantly reduced by PES compared with BMS in both diabetic (11.2% versus 5.2%; hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]=0.45 [0.21 to 0.93]; P=0.03) and nondiabetic (6.8% versus 4.3%, hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]=0.63 [0.44 to 0.92]; P=0.02) patients. In patients with insulin-treated diabetes, PES compared with BMS reduced the 12-month TLR rate from 21.4% to 7.3% (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]=0.35 [0.12 to 1.03]; P=0.046). Angiographic late loss and binary restenosis at 13 months were also significantly reduced in PES-treated diabetic patients. There were no significant differences between the BMS and PES groups in the 12-month rates of death, reinfarction, stroke, or stent thrombosis in either diabetic or nondiabetic patients., Conclusions: In the large-scale, prospective, randomized HORIZONS-AMI trial, implantation of PES compared with BMS in patients with STEMI and diabetes mellitus resulted in significant reductions in ischemia-driven TLR and angiographic restenosis at 1 year, with comparable safety outcomes, including stent thrombosis. These results suggest that PES can safely be used to reduce restenosis in high-risk diabetic patients presenting with STEMI., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00433966., (© 2011 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Aims: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides high-resolution imaging which enables characterisation of atherosclerosis and vascular response to injury, but to ensure optimal analysis, one must realise potential sources of image distortion. We designed a series of analyses, using coronary stents as a model, to investigate the influence of wire position on OCT-derived vascular images., Methods and Results: The study evaluated intracoronary OCT images from the Cardialysis-Cleveland University Hospitals Cardiovascular Imaging Core Laboratories database. Intracoronary OCT images were acquired with the M2 system (LightLab Imaging Inc., Westford, MA, USA) and analysed using a customised software. Wire concentric index (WCI) was calculated as "wire-lumen distance/lumen radius". Lumen, stent, and strut contours were defined and 360 chords (1 degree increments) were placed radially between the lumen and stent contours. Strut length was defined by the number of chords spanned by each strut. Strut level thickness (SLT) was measured with each chord. SLT variability ([Max-Min SLT]/number of chords per strut) was calculated. Lumen measurements were performed with optimal calibration and repeated with ±1% changes from optimal Z-offset. The hemisphere containing an eccentric wire had shorter strut reflections (5.0±1.6° vs. 6.6±2.1°, p<0.001) compared to the opposite hemisphere. Eccentric wires depicted 84% of the struts as non-parallel to the luminal surface (>10% SLT variability). Changing Z-offset by 1% resulted in a non-uniform shrinkage or expansion of the luminal contour in images generated from eccentric wires, but not from concentric wires., Conclusions: Eccentric intraluminal position of the OCT ImageWire occurs frequently and affects calibration and interpretation of images, including length, orientation and visibility of vessel wall structures.

Background: The safety of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) continues to be debated. Pathological studies have demonstrated an association between uncovered struts and subsequent stent thrombosis. Optical coherence tomography can detect stent strut coverage in vivo on a micron-scale level. We therefore used optical coherence tomography to examine strut coverage in patients with STEMI treated with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) and bare metal stents (BMS)., Methods and Results: In the Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial, patients with STEMI were randomized 3:1 to PES or BMS implantation. In a formal substudy, optical coherence tomography at 13 months was performed in 118 consecutive randomized patients (89 PES, 29 BMS) in whom 188 stents were assessed (146 PES and 42 BMS). A total of 44 139 stent struts were analyzed by an independent core laboratory blinded to stent assignment. The primary prespecified end point, the percentage of uncovered stent struts per lesion at follow-up, was 1.1 ± 2.5% in BMS lesions versus 5.7 ± 7.0% in PES lesions (P < 0.0001). Malapposed struts were observed in 0.1 ± 0.2% of BMS lesions versus 0.9 ± 2.1% of PES lesions (P = 0.0003). Percentage net volume obstruction was 36.0 ± 15.4% with BMS and 19.2 ± 11.3% with PES (P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: In patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, implantation of PES as compared with BMS significantly reduces neointimal hyperplasia but results in higher rates of uncovered and malapposed stent struts as assessed by optical coherence tomography at 13-month follow-up. Further studies are required to determine the clinical significance of these findings., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00433966.

To date, limited information is available on the long-term discontinuation rates of antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of premature discontinuation of oral antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation and to evaluate its effects on long-term prognosis. We studied 1,358 consecutive patients successfully treated with drug-eluting stents and discharged with dual oral antiplatelet therapy. Aspirin was to be maintained lifelong, and clopidogrel was prescribed for 12 months. The patients were followed for 36 months. The prevalence and predictors of aspirin and clopidogrel discontinuation were assessed. Major adverse cardiac events, defined as death, myocardial infarction, destabilizing symptoms leading to hospitalization, and nonfatal stroke, were recorded. Definite, probable, and possible stent thrombosis (ST) and major and minor bleeding were also determined. Of the 1,358 patients, 8.8% had discontinued one or both antiplatelet agents within the first 12 months ("early" discontinuation) and 4.8% had discontinued aspirin after 1 year ("late" discontinuation). Early discontinuation was predicted by in-hospital major bleeding, the use of oral anticoagulants at discharge, and the lack of a statin prescription. Previous stroke was the only independent predictor of late discontinuation. Patients with early discontinuation experienced a greater incidence of major adverse cardiac events (28.6% vs 13.7%, p <0.001) and ST (7.6% vs 3.4%, p = 0.038). All-cause mortality (13.4% vs 4.7%, p <0.001) and cardiovascular death (5% vs 1.2%, p = 0.007) were significantly more frequent among patients with early discontinuation. In patients with late discontinuation, a nonstatistically significant increase was seen in major adverse cardiac events (20% vs 13.3%, p = 0.128) and ST (6.2% vs 3.2%, p = 0.275). In conclusion, premature discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy is relatively common, especially within the first year, and strongly associated with increased cardiovascular events, including ST and death., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to be the best reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction with ST-elevation (STEMI), but data from registries show differences in patient populations and outcomes between randomized trials and real life., Objectives: We sought to provide information about the current status of this treatment with a registry collecting data in Lombardy, the most densely populated region in Italy, with widespread availability of cathlabs and a well-established network for the treatment of STEMI., Methods and Results: Patient enrollment was performed by 32 hub centres recruiting 3901 STEMI patients who underwent PCI procedures within 12 h of the onset of symptoms, of whom 3317 patients underwent primary PCI, 376 'facilitated' PCI, and 208 rescue PCI in cathlabs located, in 77% of cases, in the same hospital of admission. In-hospital and 30-day total death were 4.4 and 6.6%, respectively. At multivariate analysis independent negative predictors of 30-day mortality were Killip class 3-4, number of involved ECG leads, chronic renal failure and age, whereas positive predictors were ST resolution more than 50% and postprocedural grade 3 thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow., Conclusions: LombardIMA PCI registry enrolled STEMI patients representing a real-world population treated with PCI. Findings presented in this study may provide a benchmark for similar registries undertaken in other Italian regions and may be helpful to assess future possible developments of care for STEMI patients.

The use of drug-eluting stents (DES) allowed the reduction in the need for repeat revascularization. At the culprit site in acute myocardial infarction patients treated with first-generation DES, the interaction between the eluted drug and the underlying necrotic core may generate different patterns of pathologic vessel response and delayed healing. A new generation DES intrepide elutes trapidil. Its modes of action are neither cytotoxic nor cytostatic, and may promote normal re-endothelialization. Due to its high resolution, optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows accurate detection of thrombus deposition and stent strut coverage at follow-up. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has enhanced tissue penetration and provides information on vessel remodeling. Using OCT and IVUS, we evaluated the intravascular morphology of the culprit vessel, the acute and intermediate result of novel DES implanted to treat an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Atherosclerosis is a dynamic degenerative disease, which can suddenly switch from a chronic condition to clinical instability, following a process of plaque rupture and thrombotic formation. Lesions at instability risk are described as "vulnerable plaque", i.e., lesions with a future high probability of becoming an acute event. Present diagnostic and screening methods are inadequate to identify these lesions. Recent ongoing research addresses two modalities: the development of non-invasive imaging techniques for a rapid diagnostic screening of middle-low risk coronary disease, and the implementation of invasive imaging microscopic techniques--involving the coronary wall--which are associated with coronarography. Some techniques (intravascular ultrasound-optical coherence tomography)--recently introduced in the clinical setting--allow in vivo monitoring of the sequence of changes in the plaque. For the first time we have now the possibility of measuring the thickness of the fibrous cap, the presence of neo-vessels and probably the density of macrophages, identifying high-risk plaques. The imaging techniques allow to track the evolution of the atherosclerotic disease (plaque volume, thickness of cap, number of thin cap plaques) assessing its progression and regression and the efficacy of treatments.

Objectives: We sought to identify patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction most likely to benefit from drug-eluting stents (DES), and to evaluate the impact of routine angiographic follow-up on the apparent differences between stent types., Background: DES might have greatest utility in patients who would benefit most from their antirestenotic properties., Methods: We randomly assigned 3,006 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction to paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) or to bare-metal stents (BMS). Events were assessed at 12 months and 24 months, with a subset undergoing routine angiographic follow-up at 13 months. Using well-known risk factors for restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR), risk groups were formed to examine the absolute differences between PES and BMS., Results: Compared with BMS, PES reduced TLR at 12 months from 7.4% to 4.5% (p = 0.003). Insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio: 3.12), reference vessel diameter ≤3.0 mm (hazard ratio: 2.89), and lesion length ≥30 mm (hazard ratio: 2.49) were independent predictors of 12-month TLR after BMS. In patients with 2 or 3 of these baseline risk factors, PES compared with BMS markedly reduced 12-month TLR (19.8% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.003). In patients with 1 of these risk factors, the 12-month rates of TLR were modestly reduced by PES (7.3% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.02). The 12-month TLR rates were low and similar for both stents in patients with 0 risk factors (3.3% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.93). Routine 13-month angiographic follow-up resulted in a marked increase in TLR procedures (more so with BMS) so that the absolute incremental benefit of PES compared with BMS doubled from 2.9% at 12 months to 6.0% at 24 months, a difference evident in all risk strata., Conclusions: Patients at high risk for TLR after BMS in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction for whom DES are of greatest benefit may be identified. Conversely, DES may be of less clinical benefit for patients at lower risk for TLR after BMS. Routine angiographic follow-up increases the perceived clinical benefits of DES, and must be avoided to accurately estimate absolute treatment effects. (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction [HORIZONS-AMI]; NCT00433966)., (Copyright © 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We evaluated whether presentation of patients with STEMI to a noninterventional facility requiring transfer for primary PCI compared to direct admission to a PCI center has an impact on clinical outcomes. Of 3,602 patients enrolled in the multicenter, prospective HORIZONS-AMI trial, 988 (24.7%) were transferred for primary PCI and 2,614 were directly admitted to an interventional hospital. Clinical outcomes at 30 days and 1 year were evaluated. Median time to reperfusion in patients with transfer was 67 minutes longer compared to patients without transfer (272 vs 205 minutes, p <0.001), and first door-to-balloon time was 47 minutes longer (134 vs 87 minutes, p <0.001). At 30 days and 1 year there were no significant differences between patients with and without transfer in the rates of major adverse cardiac events (30 days 5.8% vs 5.4%, p = 0.68; 1 year 11.6% vs 12.0%, p = 0.74), major bleeding (30 days 7.3% vs 6.9%, p = 0.66; 1 year 7.9% vs 7.4%, p = 0.63), or mortality (30 days 2.6% vs 2.6%, p = 0.92; 1 year 4.0% vs 4.2%, p = 0.81). In transfer and nontransfer patients use of bivalirudin compared to unfractionated heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor was associated with lower rates of bleeding, cardiac death, and net adverse clinical events. In conclusion, in the HORIZONS-AMI trial, 30-day and 1-year survival rates and clinical outcomes were comparable in patients with STEMI requiring and not requiring transfer for primary PCI., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We compared intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings of fractures of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) versus paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs). IVUS findings in 6 PES fractures (all in the right coronary artery) in 6 patients from a clinical trial cohort were compared to 14 SES fractures (8 in the right coronary artery, 2 in the left anterior descending coronary artery, and 4 in the left circumflex coronary artery) in 13 patients from our institutional cohort. Comparing PES fractures to SES fractures, IVUS analysis showed (1) similar frequency of complete stent fracture (1 of 6, 17%, vs 3 of 14, 21%, p >0.99), (2) similar frequency of fracture adjacent to calcified plaque or stent metal overlap (5 of 6, 86%, vs 14 of 14, 100%, p = 0.99), (3) more frequent complete malalignment of proximal and distal fragments in PES strut fractures compared to SES fractures (5 of 6, 83%, vs 1 of 14, 7%, p = 0.002), (4) similar stent lengths (45.2 mm, 23.8 to 50.7, vs 39.3 mm, 22.6 to 73.4, p >0.99), (5) similar fracture lengths (0.5 mm, 0.4 to 0.7, vs 0.7 mm, 0.6 to 1.0, p = 0.14), and (6) larger reference external elastic membrane area (15.0 mm(2), 13.5 to 18.0, vs 10.4 mm(2), 6.8 to 13.6, p = 0.01). In conclusion, malalignment of proximal and distal stent fragments more often occurred in PES fractures compared to SES fractures; otherwise the IVUS features of PES and SES fractures were similar., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes randomized in the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) were examined. The ACUITY trial assessed the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin alone versus bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor versus heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor in 13,819 patients with moderate- and high-risk acute coronary syndromes, 7,789 of whom underwent PCI. A total of 329 patients (4.2%) underwent PCI of SVGs in ACUITY. The primary end points at 30 days were composite ischemia or major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned target vessel revascularization), major bleeding (unrelated to coronary artery bypass grafting), and net adverse clinical events (composite ischemia or major bleeding). The rates of ischemic, bleeding, and net clinical end points were similar with bivalirudin monotherapy, bivalirudin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, and heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Net adverse clinical outcome rates at 30 days were 22%, 26%, and 22% (p = 0.67), respectively, for the 3 groups. Major adverse cardiac event rates at 1 year were 37%, 37%, and 43% (p = 0.95), respectively. Minor bleeding unrelated to coronary artery bypass grafting at 30 days was significantly lower with bivalirudin alone compared with heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (26% vs 38%, p = 0.05). In conclusion, bivalirudin is an effective anticoagulant in PCI of SVGs in acute coronary syndromes, with similar rates of major adverse cardiac events and net adverse cardiac events and lower minor bleeding complications in comparison with heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor or bivalirudin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor., (Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: A potentially adverse vascular response to overlapping drug eluting stents (DES) has been suggested in current research., Objective: To evaluate the impact of baseline disease severity at the site of stent overlap., Methods and Results: This is a substudy of ODESSA, a prospective, randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate healing of overlapping stents. 71/77 patients with a total of 86 overlapping stents were studied: 25 sirolimus, 24 paclitaxel, 26 zotarolimus-eluting stents; and 11 bare metal stents (BMS). Patients were categorised into high-grade stenosis (HGS, ≥ 70% diameter stenosis) and low-grade stenosis (LGS, <70%) at the site of stent overlap. Angiography and intravascular ultrasound were performed after stent deployment and repeated at 6 months, together with additional optical coherence tomography. Images were analysed by an independent core laboratory. End points were binary restenosis, percentage neointimal hyperplasia (%NIH), mean lumen and stent areas and degree of strut coverage/apposition at overlapping stents at 6 months. Stent overlaps occurred in 49 HGS and 37 LGS. Restenosis was found in 5/6 HGS versus 0/5 LGS treated with overlapping BMS (p=0.01) and 4/43 HGS versus 0/32 LGS treated with overlapping DES. There was a trend towards higher %NIH at BMS overlap in HGS versus LGS (p=0.07). DES overlaps had lower lumen and stent areas and similar %NIH in HGS versus LGS. Any uncovered or malapposed struts occurred more often in overlapping DES at LGS than at HGS (59.4% vs 32.6%, p=0.03)., Conclusions: Overlapping DES in normal-appearing coronary segments showed a higher incidence of uncovered or malapposed struts, while restenosis occurred exclusively in overlapping stents at HGS. These findings should be considered when deploying overlapping stents.

Background: The incidence and mechanisms of acute and late stent malapposition after primary stent implantation in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction remain unclear., Methods and Results: The Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial was a dual-arm, factorial, randomized trial comparing paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) and otherwise equivalent bare metal stents (BMS) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. The intravascular ultrasound substudy enrolled 241 patients with 263 native coronary lesions (201 PES, 62 BMS) with baseline and 13-month follow-up imaging. Postintervention acute stent malapposition (ASM) occurred in 34.3% PES- and 40.3% BMS-treated lesions. Of these, 39.1% PES- and 40.0% BMS-treated lesions resolved at follow-up, especially within the stent body (66.7%); complete resolution was accompanied by a reduction in external elastic membrane area. An ASM area >1.2 mm(2) best separated persistent from resolved ASM. At follow-up, a higher frequency of late stent malapposition was detected in PES-treated lesions (46.8%) mainly because of more late acquired stent malapposition (30.8%) compared with BMS-treated lesions. Late acquired stent malapposition area correlated to the decrease of peri-stent plaque in the subset of lesions without positive remodeling and only to change in external elastic membrane in the group with positive remodeling. Independent predictors of late acquired stent malapposition were plaque/thrombus protrusion (odds ratio, 5.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.32 to 13.54) and PES use (odds ratio, 6.32; 95% CI, 2.15 to 18.62)., Conclusions: The incidence of ASM was similar in PES- and BMS-treated lesions, but late acquired stent malapposition was more common in PES-treated lesions. The reason for resolved ASM was negative remodeling, with larger ASM areas separating persistent from resolved ASM. Late acquired stent malapposition was due mainly to positive remodeling and plaque/thrombus resolution., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00433966.

Background: Polymer-coated drug-eluting stents are effective in preventing restenosis but have been associated with delayed healing and incomplete strut coverage. It is unknown whether paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) with minimal biodegradable abluminal coating enhances strut coverage while preventing neointimal hyperplasia. Using optical coherence tomography (OCT) as a primary imaging modality, we assessed the proportion of uncovered struts at 6-month follow-up in PES coated with durable versus ultrathin (<1 microm) biodegradable abluminal polymers., Methods and Results: In this pilot trial, 60 patients with de novo lesions (< or =25 mm) in native coronary vessels were randomly assigned to receive either TAXUS Liberté PES or JACTAX PES, a Liberté stent with polymer deposited abluminally as microdots (JACTAX HD: 9.2 microg each of polymer and paclitaxel per 16-mm stent; JACTAX LD: 5 microg each). OCT follow-up occurred at 6 months with clinical follow-up through 1 year. The primary end point was percent uncovered struts by OCT. An independent core laboratory blinded to stent assignment analyzed images. The 6-month rate of uncovered struts per patient was 5.3+/-14.7% for TAXUS Liberté, 7.0+/-12.2% for JACTAX HD, and 4.6+/-7.3% for JACTAX LD (P=0.81); percent malapposed struts was 1.4+/-4.4%, 0.8+/-1.9%, and 1.1+/-2.8%, respectively (P=0.86). Strut-level intimal thickness was 0.20+/-0.10, 0.22+/-0.15, and 0.24+/-0.15 mm (P=0.64); percent volume obstruction by OCT was 22.2+/-12.8, 22.5+/-16.2, and 25.8+/-15.2 (P=0.69). There were no deaths, Q-wave myocardial infarctions, or stent thromboses through 1 year., Conclusions: JACTAX PES with an ultrathin microdot biodegradable abluminal polymer did not result in improved strut coverage at 6 months compared with TAXUS Liberté., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00776204.

Objectives: This study sought to assess the relationship between 1-year mortality and baseline patient risk in the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes with RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial., Background: The HORIZONS-AMI trial showed that bivalirudin compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) decreased major bleeding and 30-day and 1-year mortality in patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention for acute myocardial infarction., Methods: Patients in the HORIZONS-AMI trial were classified as low, intermediate, and high risk according to the CADILLAC (Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications) risk score based on 7 clinical variables., Results: Among 2,530 CADILLAC-score evaluable HORIZONS-AMI trial patients, 1,522 (60%) were classified as low risk, 531 (21%) as intermediate risk, and 477 (19%) as high risk. The mortality rates in the bivalirudin and UFH plus GPI arms, respectively, were 0.4% and 1.2% (p = 0.09) in the low-risk group, 4.2% and 4.1% (p = 0.99) in the intermediate-risk group, and 8.4% and 15.9% (p = 0.01) in the high-risk group. Among high-risk patients, there was also a decreased rate of recurrent myocardial infarction in patients randomized to bivalirudin as compared to UFH plus GPI (3.6% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.04)., Conclusions: In high-risk patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction, bivalirudin compared with UFH plus GPI reduces 1-year mortality and recurrent myocardial infarction. (HORIZONS-AMI trial; NCT00433966)., (Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Our objective was to evaluate the impact of door-to-balloon time (DBT) on mortality depending on clinical risk and time to presentation., Background: DBT affects the mortality rate in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, but the impact may vary across subgroups., Methods: The CADILLAC (Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications) and HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trials evaluated stent and antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We studied the impact of DBT on mortality in 4,548 patients based on time to presentation and clinical risk., Results: The 1-year mortality rate was lower in patients with short versus long DBT (< or = 90 min vs. >90 min, 3.1% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.045). Short DBTs were associated with a lower mortality rate in patients with early presentation (< or = 90 min: 1.9% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.029) but not those with later presentation (>90 min: 4.0% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.47). Short DBTs showed similar trends for a lower mortality rate in high-risk (5.7% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.12) and low-risk (1.1% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.25) patients. Short DBTs had similar relative risk reductions in patients with early presentation in high-risk (3.7% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.08) and low-risk (0.8% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.32) patients, although the absolute benefit was greatest in high-risk patients., Conclusions: Short DBTs (< or = 90 min) are associated with a lower mortality rate in patients with early presentation but have less impact on the mortality rate in patients presenting later. The absolute mortality rate reduction with short DBT is greatest in high-risk patients presenting early. These data may be helpful in designing triage strategies for reperfusion therapy in patients presenting to non-percutaneous coronary intervention hospitals., (Copyright 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a practical risk score to predict the risk and implications of major bleeding in acute coronary syndromes (ACS)., Background: Hemorrhagic complications have been strongly linked with subsequent mortality in patients with ACS., Methods: A total of 17,421 patients with ACS (including non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [MI], ST-segment elevation MI, and biomarker negative ACS) were studied in the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) and the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes with RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trials. An integer risk score for major bleeding within 30 days was developed from a multivariable logistic regression model., Results: Non-coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG)-related major bleeding within 30 days occurred in 744 patients (7.3%) and had 6 independent baseline predictors (female sex, advanced age, elevated serum creatinine and white blood cell count, anemia, non-ST-segment elevation MI, or ST-segment elevation MI) and 1 treatment-related variable (use of heparin + a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor rather than bivalirudin alone) (model c-statistic = 0.74). The integer risk score differentiated patients with a 30-day rate of non-CABG-related major bleeding ranging from 1% to over 40%. In a time-updated covariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression model, major bleeding was an independent predictor of a 3.2-fold increase in mortality. The link to mortality risk was strongest for non-CABG-related Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI)-defined major bleeding followed by non-TIMI major bleeding with or without blood transfusions, whereas isolated large hematomas and CABG-related bleeding were not significantly associated with subsequent mortality., Conclusions: Patients with ACS have marked variation in their risk of major bleeding. A simple risk score based on 6 baseline measures plus anticoagulation regimen identifies patients at increased risk for non-CABG-related bleeding and subsequent 1-year mortality, for whom appropriate treatment strategies can be implemented., (Copyright 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Using optical coherence tomography, we assessed the proportion of uncovered struts at 6-month follow-up in zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), specifically Endeavor (Medtronic CardioVascular, Santa Rosa, California) stents, and identical bare-metal stents (BMS) implanted in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Background: Sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents implanted in STEMI have been associated with delayed healing and incomplete strut coverage. ZES are associated with a more complete and uniform strut coverage in stable patients, but whether this holds true also after STEMI is unknown., Methods: Forty-four patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI were randomized to ZES or BMS (3:1 randomization). Angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography follow-up was conducted at 6 months and clinical follow-up at 1 year. All images were analyzed by an independent core laboratory that was blind to stent assignments., Results: There were no differences between ZES and BMS in percentage of uncovered struts (median: 0.00% [interquartile range (IQR): 0.00% to 1.78%] vs. 1.98% [IQR: 0.21% to 7.33%], p = 0.13), maximum length of uncovered segments (0.00 [IQR: 0.00 to 1.19] mm vs. 1.38 [IQR: 0.65 to 3.30] mm, p = 0.10), percentage of malapposed struts (0.00% [IQR: 0.00% to 0.23%] vs. 0.15% [IQR: 0.00% to 5.81%], p = 0.16), and maximum length of malapposed segments (0.00 [IQR: 0.00 to 0.67] mm vs. 0.33 [IQR: 0.00 to 2.55] mm, p = 0.20). Neointimal response was similar between ZES and BMS (332 [IQR: 240 to 429] microm vs. 186 [IQR: 136 to 348] microm, p = 0.99) and evenly distributed. No late acquired malapposition was observed in both groups. There were no deaths, myocardial infarction, or stent thromboses at 1 year., Conclusions: This optical coherence tomography study found no difference in strut coverage and similar vessel response to ZES, when compared with identical BMS, implanted during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI patients. (Six-Month Coverage and Vessel Wall Response of the Zotarolimus Drug-Eluting Stent Implanted in AMI Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography [OCTAMI]; NCT00704561)., (Copyright 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We designed a randomized trial exploiting optical coherence tomography (OCT) to assess coverage and apposition of overlapping bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) in human coronary arteries., Background: Overlapping DES impair healing in animals. Optical coherence tomography allows accurate in vivo assessment of stent strut coverage and apposition., Methods: Seventy-seven patients with long coronary stenoses were randomized to overlapping sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), or BMS. The primary goal of the study was to determine the rate of uncovered/malapposed struts in overlap versus nonoverlap segments, according to stent type, at 6-month follow-up with OCT., Results: A total of 53,047 struts were analyzed. The rate of uncovered/malapposed struts was 1.5 +/- 3.4% and 0.6 +/- 2.7% in overlap versus nonoverlap BMS (p = NS), respectively, and 4.3 +/- 11% and 3.6 +/- 8% in overlap versus nonoverlap DES (p = NS), respectively. There were no differences in the rates of uncovered/malapposed struts between overlapping BMS and DES, likely due to low frequency of uncovered/malapposed struts in ZES (0.1 +/- 0.4%), which offset the higher rates observed in SES (6.7 +/- 9.6%) and PES (6.7 +/- 16.5%, p < 0.05). Overlap segments showed greater neointimal volume obstruction versus nonoverlap segments in all DES (p < 0.05 for all DES types). Strut-level neointimal thickness at overlap and nonoverlap segments were lowest in SES (0.16 +/- 0.1 mm and 0.12 +/- 0.1 mm, respectively) compared with PES (0.27 +/- 0.1 mm and 0.20 +/- 0.1 mm, respectively), ZES (0.40 +/- 0.16 mm and 0.33 +/- 0.13 mm, respectively), and BMS (0.55 +/- 0.31 mm and 0.53 +/- 0.25 mm, respectively, p < 0.05)., Conclusions: As assessed by OCT the impact of DES on vascular healing was similar at overlapping and nonoverlapping sites. However, strut malapposition, coverage pattern, and neointimal hyperplasia differ significantly according to DES type. (Optical Coherence Tomography for Drug Eluting Stent Safety [ODESSA]; NCT00693030)., (Copyright 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: We sought to evaluate the vascular response of stent struts deployed in bifurcation segments using optical coherence tomography (OCT)., Methods and Results: This study is a sub-analysis of ODESSA, a prospective randomised trial designed to evaluate healing of overlapped drug-eluting stents (DES) vs. bare metal stents (BMS) (sirolimus SES: paclitaxel PES: zotarolimus ZES: Liberté BMS in a 2: 2: 2: 1 ratio) for de novo coronary artery stenosis. OCT was performed at 6-month follow-up. Bifurcation segments with side branch diameters larger than 1.5mm by angiography were analysed. The cross-sectional image at the bifurcation segment was divided into three regions: opposite to the ostium (OO), adjacent to the ostium (AO), or side-branch ostium (SO). Struts were classified in three categories: uncovered (U), covered (C), or proliferative (P). The incidence of each strut category was compared between regions and stent types. There were 12,656 struts in 61 bifurcation segments (PES: 16, SES: 14, ZES: 23, Liberté BMS: 8) from 46 patients obtained at six months. PES had the highest rate of U in SO region (PES 60.1, SES 17.0, ZES 13.2, BMS 12.3 (%), P<0.0001), whereas SES demonstrated the highest rate of U in OO (PES 3.8, SES 14.0, ZES 1.5, BMS 0.0 (%), P=0.0025)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates a variable pattern of strut coverage in the bifurcation among stent technologies, with a high percentage of PES floating struts remaining uncovered at 6-month follow-up.

Background: Mechanisms underlying the association between myocardial bridge (MB)-stenting and in-stent restenosis (ISR) are still unclear., Objective: To assess the impact of MB on ISR using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)., Methods: In the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial, 100 left anterior descending artery (LAD) culprit lesions (79 treated with paclitaxel-eluting stents [PES] and 21 treated with bare metal stents) were imaged with serial IVUS immediately postprocedure and at 13 months., Results: At baseline the LAD stent extended into the MB segment beyond the culprit lesion in seven patients (MB-stent group). In the remaining 93 patients the LAD stent was implanted only in the culprit lesion without extending into the MB segment (non-MB-stent group). In PES-treated lesions intimal hyperplasia (IH) was greater in MB-stent group than in non-MB-stent group (1.0 [0.9, 1.3] mm(2) vs. 0.4 [0.2, 0.7] mm(2), P = 0.007). When comparing the MB-stent segment with the non-MB-stent segment in the MB-stent group treated with PES, a significant reduction in lumen area was observed in only the MB-stent segment, owing to an augmented IH within the MB-stent segment (1.56 [1.40, 1.91] mm(2) vs. 0.77 [0.55, 1.23] mm(2) for non-MB-stent segment, P = 0.08), not significant stent recoil (Deltastent area). At follow-up, the minimum lumen area was smaller in the MB-stent group than in the non-MB-stent group (2.9 [2.5, 4.2] mm(2) vs. 5.2 [4.1, 6.7] mm(2), P = 0.02)., Conclusions: Increased incidence of ISR associated with MB-stenting may be attributable to enhanced IH, specific to stented MB segment, not to chronic stent recoil.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a novel imaging technology based on low-coherence interferometry that uses scattering of near-infrared light as a signal source to provide vascular cross-sectional imaging with definition far superior to any other available modality. With spatial resolution of up to 10 microm, OCT provides 20-fold higher resolution than intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), currently the most used modality for intra-coronary imaging. OCT has the capacity to provide invaluable insight into the various phases of atherosclerotic disease and vascular response to therapeutics. Studies have shown the ability of OCT to detect arterial structures and assist in the determination of different histological constituents. Its capacity to distinguish different grades of atherosclerotic changes and the various types of plaques, as compared to histology, has recently been demonstrated with acceptable intra-observer and inter-observer correlations for these findings. OCT provides unrivaled real-time in vivo endovascular resolution, which has been exploited to assess the vascular structures and response to device deployment. While depth remains a limitation for OCT plaque characterization beyond 2-mm, near-histological resolution can be achieved within the first millimeter of the vessel wall allowing unique assessment of fibrous cap characteristics and thickness. In addition, assessment of neointimal coverage, para-strut tissue patterns and stent apposition can now be scrutinized for individual struts on the micron scale, the so-called strut-level analysis. OCT has propelled intravascular imaging into micron-level in vivo vascular analysis and is expected to soon become a valuable and indispensable tool for the cardiologists on both clinical and research applications.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a novel intravascular imaging modality, based on infrared light emission, that enables a high resolution arterial wall imaging, in the range of 10-20 microns. This feature of OCT allows the visualization of specific components of the atherosclerotic plaques. The aim of the present Expert Review Document is to address the methodology, terminology and clinical applications of OCT for qualitative and quantitative assessment of coronary arteries and atherosclerosis.

Background: Vascular responses to drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction are unknown. In the prospective, multicenter Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial, patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction within 12 hours of symptom onset were randomized 3:1 to TAXUS EXPRESS paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) or EXPRESS bare metal stents (BMS)., Methods and Results: A formal intravascular ultrasound substudy enrolled 464 patients with baseline and 13-month follow-up imaging at 36 centers. Overall, 446 lesions in 402 patients were suitable for standard qualitative and quantitative analyses, which were performed at an independent blinded core laboratory. The primary prespecified end point was the in-stent percent net volume obstruction at follow-up. Median stent length measured 23.4 mm (first and third quartiles, 18.5 and 31.9 mm). PES compared with BMS significantly reduced 13-month percent net volume obstruction (6.5% [first and third quartiles, 2.2% and 10.8%] versus 15.6% [first and third quartiles, 7.2% and 28.8%]; P<0.0001). PES compared with BMS also resulted in more late-acquired stent malapposition (29.6% versus 7.9%; P=0.0005) resulting from positive vessel remodeling. Plaque and/or thrombus protrusion through stent struts was initially present in 70.4% of PES and 64.8% of BMS; all resolved during follow-up. New aneurysm formation, stent fracture, and subclinical thrombus were uncommon, although seen only in PES., Conclusions: PES compared with BMS significantly reduce neointimal hyperplasia in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction but also result in a high frequency of late-acquired stent malapposition as a result of positive vessel remodeling. Ongoing long-term follow-up is required to establish the clinical significance of these findings. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00433966.

Cardiovascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a catheter-based invasive imaging system. Using light rather than ultrasound, OCT produces high-resolution in vivo images of coronary arteries and deployed stents. This comprehensive review will assist practicing interventional cardiologists in understanding the technical aspects of OCT based upon the physics of light and will also highlight the emerging research and clinical applications of OCT. Semi-automated imaging analyses of OCT systems permit accurate measurements of luminal architecture and provide insights regarding stent apposition, overlap, neointimal thickening, and, in the case of bioabsorbable stents, information regarding the time course of stent dissolution. The advantages and limitations of this new imaging modality will be discussed with emphasis on key physical and technical aspects of intracoronary image acquisition, current applications, definitions, pitfalls, and future directions.

Objectives: Our aim was to determine whether a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel compared with 300 mg results in improved clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Background: A 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel compared with 300 mg provides more rapid and potent inhibition of platelet activation., Methods: In the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial, 3,602 patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI were randomized to bivalirudin (n = 1,800) or unfractionated heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (n = 1,802). Randomization was stratified by thienopyridine loading dose, which was determined before random assignment., Results: Patients in the 600-mg (n = 2,158) compared with the 300-mg (n = 1,153) clopidogrel loading dose group had significantly lower 30-day unadjusted rates of mortality (1.9% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.03), reinfarction (1.3% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.02), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (1.7% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.04), without higher bleeding rates. Compared with unfractionated heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, bivalirudin monotherapy resulted in similar reductions in net adverse cardiac event rates within the 300-mg (15.2% vs. 12.3%) and 600-mg (10.4% vs. 7.3%) clopidogrel loading dose subgroups (p(interaction) = 0.41). By multivariable analysis, a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose was an independent predictor of lower rates of 30-day major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio: 0.72 [95% confidence interval: 0.53 to 0.98], p = 0.04)., Conclusions: In patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI with contemporary anticoagulation regimens, a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel may safely reduce 30-day ischemic adverse event rates compared with a 300-mg loading dose. (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction [HORIZONS-AMI]; NCT00433966).

Background: In the HORIZONS-AMI trial, patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who were treated with the thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin had substantially lower 30-day rates of major haemorrhagic complications and net adverse clinical events than did patients assigned to heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI). Here, we assess whether these initial benefits were maintained at 1 year of follow-up., Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older were eligible for enrolment in this multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial if they had STEMI, presented within 12 h after the onset of symptoms, and were undergoing primary PCI. 3602 eligible patients were randomly assigned by interactive voice response system in a 1:1 ratio to receive bivalirudin (0.75 mg/kg intravenous bolus followed by 1.75 mg/kg per h infusion; n=1800) or heparin plus a GPI (control; 60 IU/kg intravenous bolus followed by boluses with target activated clotting time 200-250 s; n=1802). The two primary trial endpoints were major bleeding and net adverse clinical events (NACE; consisting of major bleeding or composite major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE; death, reinfarction, target vessel revascularisation for ischaemia, or stroke]). This prespecified analysis reports data for the 1-year follow-up. Analysis was by intention to treat. Patients with missing data were censored at the time of withdrawal from the study or at last follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00433966., Findings: 1-year data were available for 1696 patients in the bivalirudin group and 1702 patients in the control group. Reasons for participant dropout were loss to follow-up and withdrawal of consent. The rate of NACE was lower in the bivalirudin group than in the control group (15.6%vs 18.3%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.97, p=0.022), as a result of a lower rate of major bleeding in the bivalirudin group (5.8%vs 9.2%, HR 0.61, 0.48-0.78, p<0.0001). The rate of MACE was similar between groups (11.9%vs 11.9%, HR 1.00, 0.82-1.21, p=0.98). The 1-year rates of cardiac mortality (2.1%vs 3.8%, HR 0.57, 0.38-0.84, p=0.005) and all-cause mortality (3.5%vs 4.8%, HR 0.71, 0.51-0.98, p=0.037) were lower in the bivalirudin group than in the control group., Interpretation: In patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, anticoagulation with bivalirudin reduced the rates of net adverse clinical events and major bleeding at 1 year compared with treatment with heparin plus a GPI. This finding has important clinical implications for the selection of optimum treatment strategies for patients with STEMI., Funding: Cardiovascular Research Foundation, with unrestricted grant support from Boston Scientific Corporation and The Medicines Company.

The impact of thienopyridine administration prior to primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been well studied. We therefore examined the database from the prospective, multicenter, controlled CADILLAC trial in which 1,036 patients were randomized to bare metal stenting with or without abciximab to determine whether patients who received a thienopyridine prior to bare metal stenting in AMI had superior clinical outcomes. Per operator discretion, 659 patients (63.6%; Th+) received either a 500 mg ticlopidine loading dose (n = 623) or a 300 mg clopidogrel loading dose (n = 40), while 377 patients (36.4%; Th-) received no thienopyridine prior to stent implantation. Baseline and procedural characteristics of the two groups, including abciximab use (52.5% vs 52.8%, P = 0.93) were well matched. Th+ compared to Th- patients had lower rates of core lab assessed TIMI 0/1 flow postprocedure (0.8% vs 2.7%, P = 0.01). Th+ compared to Th- patients also had significantly reduced in-hospital and 30-day rates of ischemic target vessel revascularization (TVR) (1.1% vs 3.2%, P = 0.01 and 1.5% vs 3.8%, P = 0.02, respectively) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (2.7% vs 5.8%, P = 0.01 and 4.0% vs 6.9%, P = 0.03, respectively), results that remained significant after covariate adjustment. In conclusion, in this large prospective, controlled trial, patients receiving a thienopyridine prior to primary stenting in AMI were less likely to have TIMI 0/1 flow postprocedure and experienced reduced in-hospital and 30-day rates of ischemic TVR and MACE compared to those not administered a thienopyridine prior to stent implantation.

Objectives: We sought to determine the relationship between red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI)., Background: The implications of RBC transfusion in patients undergoing primary PCI for AMI have not been evaluated., Methods: Clinical outcomes of patients from the prospective, randomized CADILLAC (Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications) trial were analyzed by administration of in-hospital RBC transfusion not related to coronary artery bypass surgery., Results: Of 2,060 randomized patients, 82 (3.98%) received RBC transfusion during the index hospitalization, including 33 (1.60%) with moderate/severe bleeding and 49 (2.38%) without overt major bleeding. Transfusion was independently associated with baseline anemia (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 4.44 [2.60 to 7.58], p < 0.0001), older age (1.03 [1.01 to 1.06], p = 0.002), triple-vessel disease (2.54 [1.47 to 4.38], p = 0.0008), and female sex (1.04 [1.02 to 1.06], p = 0.0008). Patients transfused versus not transfused had significantly higher rates of 1-year mortality (23.9% vs. 3.4%), disabling stroke (2.5% vs. 0.5%), reinfarction (7.0% vs. 2.2%), and composite major adverse cardiac events (41.0% vs. 16.6%) (all p values < 0.01). After multivariable adjustment for potential confounders including transfusion propensity, RBC transfusion was independently associated with mortality at 30 days (hazards ratio: 4.71, p = 0.0005) and 1 year (hazards ratio: 3.16, p = 0.0005)., Conclusions: An RBC transfusion after primary PCI in AMI may be harmful, which is consistent with the findings from other studies after PCI in the noninfarct setting. Alternatively, RBC transfusion may be a marker of markedly increased risk. Randomized studies are warranted to determine the optimal threshold for RBC transfusion in patients with AMI undergoing mechanical reperfusion therapy.

Aims: The long-term impact of treating bifurcation lesions on the overall outcome of patients with multivessel coronary disease treated percutaneously with drug-eluting stents is unknown. This analysis determined the influence of bifurcation treatment using sirolimus-eluting stents on 3-year clinical outcomes., Methods and Results: Of the 607 patients (2,160 lesions) in the ARTS II study, 324 patients underwent revascularisation procedures involving treatment of at least one bifurcation (465 lesions). Three-year outcomes were compared to those without bifurcations. Despite more diffuse and complex disease in the bifurcation group, survival free of adverse events was equivalent in the two groups. At 3-years, there was no difference in rate of overall MACCE (20.2% vs. 18.5%, p=NS) or any of the component events between the bifurcation and the non-bifurcation group. There was a trend for a higher rate of definite stent thrombosis in the bifurcation group (4.6 vs 2.1%, p=0.1), but in multivariate analysis the CK value post-procedure served as the only independent predictor of definite stent thrombosis (p=0.015), with the presence of a bifurcation lesion of borderline significance (p=0.056)., Conclusions: In multivessel disease treated by PCI with DES, the presence of bifurcation disease had no adverse influence on 3-year clinical outcomes.

Background: There is no consensus regarding the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who are undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: We randomly assigned, in a 3:1 ratio, 3006 patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction to receive paclitaxel-eluting stents (2257 patients) or otherwise identical bare-metal stents (749 patients). The two primary end points of the study were the 12-month rates of target-lesion revascularization for ischemia (analysis powered for superiority) and a composite safety outcome measure of death, reinfarction, stroke, or stent thrombosis (powered for noninferiority with a 3.0% margin). The major secondary end point was angiographic evidence of restenosis at 13 months., Results: Patients who received paclitaxel-eluting stents, as compared with those who received bare-metal stents, had significantly lower 12-month rates of ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization (4.5% vs. 7.5%; hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 0.83; P=0.002) and target-vessel revascularization (5.8% vs. 8.7%; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89; P=0.006), with noninferior rates of the composite safety end point (8.1% vs. 8.0%; hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.36; absolute difference, 0.1 percentage point; 95% CI, -2.1 to 2.4; P=0.01 for noninferiority; P=0.92 for superiority). Patients treated with paclitaxel-eluting stents and those treated with bare-metal stents had similar 12-month rates of death (3.5% and 3.5%, respectively; P=0.98) and stent thrombosis (3.2% and 3.4%, respectively; P=0.77). The 13-month rate of binary restenosis was significantly lower with paclitaxel-eluting stents than with bare-metal stents (10.0% vs. 22.9%; hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.57; P<0.001)., Conclusions: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who were undergoing primary PCI, implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents, significantly reduced angiographic evidence of restenosis and recurrent ischemia necessitating repeat revascularization procedures. No safety concerns were apparent at 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00433966.), (2009 Massachusetts Medical Society)

Background: The role of emergency reperfusion therapy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) resuscitated after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has not been clearly established yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in-hospital and postdischarge outcomes of STEMI patients surviving OHCA and undergoing emergency angioplasty (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) within an established regional network., Methods: We prospectively collected data on 2,617 consecutive patients with STEMI treated with emergency PCI in 2005; in-hospital and 6-month outcomes of 99 patients who had experienced OHCA were compared with those of 2,518 patients without OHCA. The OHCA patients also underwent a cerebral performance evaluation after 12 months., Results: OHCA patients were at higher clinical risk at presentation (cardiogenic shock 26% vs 5%, P < .0001). Percutaneous coronary intervention was successful in 80% of the OHCA and 89% of the non-OHCA patients (P = NS). In-hospital mortality rates were 22% and 3%, respectively (P < .0001). Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality among OHCA patients were longer delay between the call to the emergency medical system and the start of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (odds ratio [OR] 3.5, P = .03), nonshockable initial rhythms (OR 10.5, P = .002), cardiogenic shock (OR 3.05, P = .035), and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 on admission (OR 2.9, P = .032). The 6-month composite rate of death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization among OHCA patients surviving the acute phase was comparable to that of non-OHCA patients (16% vs 13.9%, P = NS), and 87% of them showed a favorable neurologic recovery after 1 year., Conclusions: Resuscitated OHCA patients undergoing emergency PCI for STEMI have worse clinical presentation and higher in-hospital mortality compared to those without OHCA. However, subsequent cardiac events are similar, and neurologic recovery is more favorable than reported in most previous series.

Aims: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of the paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS moderate-release (MR) investigation-only stent for the treatment of long, complex coronary artery lesions., Methods and Results: TAXUS VI was a prospective, double-blind, multicentre trial wherein 446 patients were randomised between a TAXUS Express MR stent and an uncoated Express Control stent. At 5-years, the overall rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was similar in the two groups at 27.8% in control and 31.3% in TAXUS (P = 0.61), including similar rates for stent thrombosis. The target vessel revascularisation (TVR) rate was 23.7% in control and 22.2% in TAXUS (P = 0.45) with a non-target lesion revascularisation (non-TLR) rate of 5.1% in control and 10.9% in TAXUS (P = 0.0274) and a TLR rate of 21.4% in control and 14.6% in TAXUS (relative reduction, 32%; P = 0.0325). Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed that the TLR benefit of TAXUS was preserved among study groups including small vessels, long lesions and patients receiving multiple overlapping stents., Conclusions: Treatment of complex coronary lesions with the TAXUS MR stent demonstrated similar MACE, similar TVR, and reduced TLR rates compared with control through five years. Based on these positive results, the aetiology of increased non-TLR TVR rate in TAXUS remains unclear.

Objective: The aim of this article is to examine whether clopidogrel and ticlopidine treatments produce similar clinical outcomes for patients receiving primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction (AMI)., Background: Prior studies have yielded conflicting results on the relative safety and efficacy of clopidogrel and ticlopidine after stent implantation, warranting an evaluation in primary stenting for AMI., Methods: In the multicenter, prospective CADILLAC trial, patients undergoing primary infarct stenting were treated at operator discretion with either ticlopidine (931 patients) or clopidogrel (163 patients) and then followed for 1 year. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable except for baseline TIMI 0/1 flow (72.5% clopidogrel vs. 63.9% ticlopidine, P = 0.04)., Results: Patients receiving clopidogrel had more recurrent ischemia in hospital (6.1 vs. 2.8%, P = 0.02) and at 30 days (10.5 vs. 5.8%, P = 0.02), more moderate and severe bleeding at 30 days (7.4 vs. 2.7%, P = 0.002), and similar rates of stent thrombosis out to 1 year (P = 0.11). By multivariable analysis, clopidogrel use was an independent predictor for recurrent ischemia in hospital (P = 0.0002), and at 30 days (P = 0.012); and of moderate and severe bleeding in hospital (P = 0.002), and at 30 days (P = 0.001)., Conclusions: Despite thienopyridines similarities, their efficacy may be different within the first 30 days of primary stenting for AMI. A prospective, randomized trial is required to confirm these findings., (Copyright 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

The risk of late stent thrombosis represents a major concern for patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES). Delayed healing and incomplete stent coverage were commonly observed in pathologic specimens of vessels treated with DES. In-situ assessment of the stent coverage has been limited by the low spatial resolution of current image modalities. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) enables real-time, full tomographic, in-vivo visualization of coronary vessel microstructure. Struts coverage and vessel response of DES compared to BMS are the most immediate clinical applications of OCT. Thickness of coverage and strut apposition can be quantified at micron-scale level with a resolution 10-30 times higher than conventional intravascular ultrasound. Current clinical experience demonstrates the high level of accuracy of OCT in evaluating the heterogeneity of vascular healing following DES implantation. Neointimal coverage at strut level assessed by OCT seems a reasonable intermediate endpoint to quickly scrutinize in preregistration studies the safety profile of the next generation of DES. Major limitations of current OCT technology are shallow depth of light penetration and the need to occlude the vessel for blood removal. Second generation forms of OCT, which allow images to be recorded faster (congruent with 10 times) during a nonocclusive flush, have been recently developed. Full, quick scan of multiple and long stent without occlusion balloon is possible. Further technical advancements are expected to provide sharper images with additional contrast and tissue texture characterization. The value of these improvements must be gauged by the degree of impact in DES technology and patient care., ((c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Background: Diabetes has been reported as an independent predictor of restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation. The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term impact of increased drug dose in sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) on neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) in diabetic patients using volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis., Methods: The 3D trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, feasibility study of double-dose (280 microg/cm2) or conventional single-dose (140 microg/cm2) SES for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions in diabetic patients. To evaluate long-term efficacy, complete serial volumetric analyses (baseline, 6-month and 2-year follow up) were performed in 39 diabetic patients (17 single-dose, 22 double-dose). Each volume was divided by stent length to acquire volume index, expressed as mm3/mm. Percent neointimal volume was calculated as (neointimal volume/stent volume) x 100 at follow up., Results: Volumetric analysis showed similar results over time between the 2 stent groups (p = NS for all). At 2-year follow up, minimal increases in NIH area and percent NIH were observed in both groups, which translated into a decrease in lumen volume index compared to baseline (p < 0.05 for all). No late-acquired incomplete stent apposition was observed in either group., Conclusions: The current single dose of sirolimus in SES is effective in inhibiting NIH in diabetic patients up to 2 years. In this patient subset, double-dose SES did not confer additional NIH suppression at 2-year follow up compared to conventional single-dose SES.

Background: Treatment with the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin, as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, results in similar suppression of ischemia while reducing hemorrhagic complications in patients with stable angina and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The safety and efficacy of bivalirudin in high-risk patients are unknown., Methods: We randomly assigned 3602 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who presented within 12 hours after the onset of symptoms and who were undergoing primary PCI to treatment with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor or to treatment with bivalirudin alone. The two primary end points of the study were major bleeding and combined adverse clinical events, defined as the combination of major bleeding or major adverse cardiovascular events, including death, reinfarction, target-vessel revascularization for ischemia, and stroke (hereinafter referred to as net adverse clinical events) within 30 days., Results: Anticoagulation with bivalirudin alone, as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, resulted in a reduced 30-day rate of net adverse clinical events (9.2% vs. 12.1%; relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 to 0.92; P=0.005), owing to a lower rate of major bleeding (4.9% vs. 8.3%; relative risk, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.77; P<0.001). There was an increased risk of acute stent thrombosis within 24 hours in the bivalirudin group, but no significant increase was present by 30 days. Treatment with bivalirudin alone, as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, resulted in significantly lower 30-day rates of death from cardiac causes (1.8% vs. 2.9%; relative risk, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.95; P=0.03) and death from all causes (2.1% vs. 3.1%; relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.00; P=0.047)., Conclusions: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who are undergoing primary PCI, anticoagulation with bivalirudin alone, as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, results in significantly reduced 30-day rates of major bleeding and net adverse clinical events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00433966 [ClinicalTrials.gov].)., (Copyright 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society.)