Search

The utility Land Rover, launched in 1948, was designed to meet the assumed needs of agriculture and to address the British government’s imposed export imperative. These very particular circumstances nevertheless yielded long-term success for the vehicle, leading to 67 years of continuous production. How then did a vehicle frequently characterised as a ‘stopgap’ product, intended to overcome the commercial constraints of the post-war British motor industry, go from humble workhorse to long-lived mythologised automotive icon? This research examines the factors leading to its prolonged production, the petrification of the design, as well as the changing value complexes associated with the utility Land Rover over time. It also deconstructs, by case study, the notion of iconisation with regard to technical artefacts and the significance of the vehicles reputation to the later hugely successful Land Rover corporate brand.\ud \ud A hybrid methodological model developed as part of the research and drawing from actor network theory (ANT), elements of the social construction of technology (SCOT) as well as ‘informational capital’ is employed. This is then utilised to identify and integrate the factors that led to the utility Land Rover’s longevity and its later frequent characterisation as an automotive icon. Furthermore, this innovative hybrid model seeks to make an original contribution to design history methodology by combining existing methodologies in an information flow diagram that facilitates the intergraded analysis of diverse factors affecting the development and nature of technical artefacts, particularly those that are long-lived. \ud \ud This thesis thereby demonstrates that the history of the utility Land Rover is one of persistence: operationally, culturally and temporally. Although anachronistic in many ways by the time production ended, the vehicle’s ability to remain relevant for seven decades was largely rooted in its versatility, both in terms of application but also through interpretive flexibility and its significance to relevant social groups. Findings also reveal that the process of iconisation requires either physical or cultural longevity of the artefact and is largely a democratised process reached by consensus, although the term ‘iconic’ has been progressively devalued through habituated use in the media.\ud \ud The research undertaken also highlights and seeks to address the limited design history research regarding automotive design particularly with regard to utility, the potential for engaging with enthusiasts and examining subjectivity in design historical scholarship, as well as the largely neglected topic of the design history of the car in developing countries.

The history of the car in Africa engages with many of the colonial interests in the region but the topic has remained largely ignored by design historians. This article explores three attempts made to develop a post-colonial car for manufacture in Africa. \ud \ud In the 1980s the Englishman Tony Howarth designed the ‘Africar’, a vehicle intended specifically for rural Africa, constructed with a wooden body and an engine borrowed from the Citroën 2CV. The 1990s saw the ‘Uri’ design, initially developed by a Namibian farmer as a simple and robust 4x4. Currently the ‘Mobius’, an inexpensive yet rugged car, is under development in Kenya. Success for all of these vehicles has been problematic however. Despite various attempts, and a growing demand for personal transport in Africa, there is as yet no indigenously designed and manufactured car addressing the continents needs. \ud \ud This article explores these examples and asks what factors have prevented the creation of an indigenous car for post-colonial Africa. The recent ‘centre-periphery’ debate is applied to the case, the notion that there is one solution for an entire continent, and the intra-African factors that have inhibited the emergence of an African car industry are also explored.

This paper examines the uses of the Land Rover in sporting activities. It explores how these activities were used to promote and expand the brand as well as the changing (and at times contradictory) customer sensibilities, which significantly impacted both the brand and ultimately the design of vehicles themselves. \ud \ud The Land Rover, originally envisaged as a ‘stop gap’ product for agriculture shortly after the Second World War, rapidly became established as the archetypal four-wheel-drive utility vehicle employed in a bewildering number of diverse roles. One such role to emerge in the 1950s was its use for expeditions, ‘adventure’ and the pursuit of sporting activities. Events such as the London to Singapore ‘First Overland’ expedition of the mid ‘50s, the ‘Darien Gap’ expedition of the ‘70s through to the ‘Camel Trophy’ of the ‘80s were milestones in its ‘sporting’ use. But there was also its use in amateur ‘off- road’ competition such as ‘trialling’ and its supporting role for the ‘country set’ through its use in hunting, shooting and equine sports.\ud \ud It has been said that Land Rover capitalised on the colonial notions of African adventures as well as masculine ideas of ‘off-roading’ to sell its products. However these themes were absorbed quite late in the products identity with the history of the brand being more nuanced and at times contradictory than the vehicles iconic status would now suggest. It can be argued that Rover (the original manufacturer) played ‘catch-up’ with the uses buyers were putting the vehicle to and then retrospectively built a brand identity on these emerging ‘value complexes’.\ud \ud This lead to a change in the value complexes associated with the vehicle and in time, spawned the proto-SUV the ‘Range Rover’ and, later, other models such as the ‘Discovery’, ‘Freelander’ and ‘Range Rover Sport’.

If design history research relies solely on institutionalized documentation and academic scholarship – that is, sanctioned knowledge – not only will its purview be limited to a very narrow segment of design culture, it will also lose out on a vast array of sources to valuable knowledge about our material environment produced by amateurs, collectors, and enthusiasts – what we in this article define as “unsanctioned knowledge.” Because of its dissociation with professional institutions and academic protocols and their – albeit admittedly utopian, but nonetheless upheld – ideals of objectivity, this type of knowledge is typically considered fundamentally subjective in nature and therefore of little or no relevance and value to academic scholarship. In this article, we argue that, to the contrary, design historical scholarship has much to gain from engaging more seriously with the unsanctioned knowledge represented by the enthusiast's eye.