Search

Purpose: Purpose of this study is to compare functional MRI parameters with histomorphological markers of tumor microvessel density (MVD) and permeability (vascular endothelial growth factor) and to determine the ultimate value of both approaches by correlation with disease outcome in patients with primary cancer of the uterine cervix., Method: Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging series in 37 patients with biopsy-proven primary cervical cancer. On the operative whole mount specimens, histomorphological markers of tumor angiogenesis (MVD, VEGF) were compared with the MRI-derived parameters. For MRI and histomorphological data, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated and compared using logrank statistics., Results: Significant (p < 0.05-0.01) associations were found between MVD and dynamic MRI parameters. No significant relationships were observed between VEGF expression and dynamic MRI parameters. Disease outcome was better assessed with dynamic MRI parameters than with the histomorphological approach., Conclusions: It is concluded that 1) the pathophysiological basis for the amplitude A in dynamic MRI is MVD but not VEGF expression; and 2) a functional, dynamic MRI approach may be more suited to assess angiogenic activity in terms of patient survival than current histomorphological-based markers of tumor angiogenesis.

Angiogenesis plays a fundamental role in tumor growth and metastasis. What is needed is a quantitative, noninvasive, and repeatable assay to estimate functional angiogenic activity of the entire tumor. The aims of the present study were to: (a) examine the relationship between functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based parameters with established histomorphological markers of tumor angiogenesis [histological microvessel density (HMVD) and vascular endothelial growth factor expression (VEGF)]; and (b) determine the ultimate value of both approaches to assess functional angiogenic active hotspots as markers of disease outcome in patients with cancer of the uterine cervix. Pharmacokinetic parameters (amplitude A, tissue exchange rate constant k21) were calculated from contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI series in 57 patients (mean age, 49 +/- 14 years) with biopsy proven uterine cervical cancer. Both pharmacokinetic parameters were correlated to histomorphologically determined areas of high HMVD and VEGF expression obtained from the operative specimens after radical surgery. In addition, the functional MRI and histomorphological data were used to assess disease outcome. A significant association was found between HMVD and the amplitude A (P < 0.001) and a less pronounced association with k21, (P < 0.05), respectively. No significant associations were found between the pharmacokinetic parameters (A, k21) and VEGF expression. When stratified into high and low median k21 groups, median k21 values >5.4 min(-1) were the only significant (P < 0.05) factors in predicting poor patient survival. None of the histomorphological markers of angiogenesis (HMVD or VEGF expression) showed any predictive power. We have found that: (a) focal hotspots of HMVD are the pathophysiological basis for differences in functional MRI; (b) areas of high microvessel density and microvessel permeability do not necessarily coincide, as demonstrated by the histomorphological and functional MRI findings; (c) the functional angiogenic activity of a tumor may not be sufficiently characterized by a histomorphological approach but rather by a functional MRI-based approach; and (d) functional MRI-based analysis may assess tumor angiogenic activity in terms of disease outcome more comprehensively than the histomorphological approach.

Dynamic studies of Gd-based contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are increasingly being used for tumor characterization as well as for therapy response monitoring. Because detailed knowledge regarding the pathophysiological properties, which in turn are responsible for differences in contrast enhancement, remains fairly undetermined, it was the aim of this study to: (a) examine the association of standard and pharmacokinetic analysis of time-intensity curves in dynamic MRI with histomorphological markers of tumor angiogenesis [microvessel density (MVD) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)]; and (b) determine the ultimate value of a histomorphological and a dynamic MRI approach by the correlation of those data with disease outcome in patients with primary cancer of the uterine cervix. Pharmacokinetic parameters (amplitude, A; exchange rate constant, k21) and standard parameters [the maximum signal intensity increase over baseline (SI-I) and the steepest signal intensity-upslope per second (SI-U/s)] were calculated from a contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI series in 37 patients with biopsy-proven primary cervical cancer. On the surgical whole mount specimens, histomorphological markers of tumor angiogenesis (MVD and VEGF) were compared to MRI-derived parameters. For MRI and histomorphological data, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated and compared using log-rank statistics. A significant association was found between MVD and A (P < 0.01) and SI-I (P < 0.05). No significant relationships were observed between VEGF expression and all dynamic MRI parameters. Kaplan-Meier curves based on k21 and SI-U/s showed that tumors with high k21 and SI-U/s values had a significantly (P < 0.05 and 0.001, respectively) worse disease outcome than did tumors with low k21 and SI-U/s values. None of the histomorphological gold standard markers for assessing tumor angiogenesis (MVD and VEGF) had any significant power to predict patient survival. It is concluded that in patients with uterine cervical cancer: (a) the pathophysiological basis for differences in dynamic MRI is MVD but not VEGF expression; (b) a functional, dynamic MRI approach (both standard and pharmacokinetic analysis) may be better suited to assess angiogenic activity in terms of patient survival than are the current histomorphological-based markers of tumor angiogenesis; and (c) compared with standard analysis, a simple pharmacokinetic analysis of time-intensity curves is not superior to assess MVD or patient survival.

Data derived from the MR-CINE phase-contrast flow measurement of renal arteries correlates well with the angiographically detected degree of stenosis and scintigraphic measurements. MR data permit the quantitative analysis of altered hemodynamics and MR is a non-invasive substitute for angiography preoperatively and during follow-up. Angiography is indicated only for the evaluation of morphological criteria.

Purpose: To evaluate the spatiotemporal evolution of radiosurgical induced changes both in metastases and in normal brain tissue adjacent to the lesions by serial magnetic resonance (MR) imaging., Methods and Materials: Thirty-five intracranial metastases of different primaries were treated in 25 patients by single high-dose radiosurgery. MR images acquired before radiosurgery were available in all patients. Sixty-three follow-up MR studies were performed in these patients including T2- and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images. The average follow-up time was 9 +/- 5 months (mean +/- standard deviation [SD]). Based on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images, tumor response was radiologically classified in the following four groups: stable disease was assumed if the average tumor diameter after treatment did not show a tumor shrinkage of more than 50% and an increase of more than 25%, partial remission as a shrinkage of tumor size of more than 50%, a disappearance of contrast-enhancing tumor as a complete remission, and an increase of tumor diameter of more than 25% as tumor progress. Moreover, we analysed signal changes on T2-weighted images in brain parenchyma adjacent to the enhancing metastases., Results: The overall mean survival time was 10.5 +/- 7 months, with a 1-year actuarial survival rate of 40%. Stable disease, partial or complete remission of the metastatic tumor was observed in 22 patients (88%). Central or homogeneous loss of contrast enhancement appeared to be a good prognostic sign for stable disease or partial remission. This association was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Three patients (12%) suffered from tumor progression. In eight patients (32%) with stable disease or partial remission, signal changes on T2-weighted images were observed in tissue adjacent to the contrast enhancing lesions. A progression of the high signal on T2-weighted images was seen in seven of the eight patients between 3 and 6 months after therapy, followed by a signal regression 6-18 months after irradiation., Conclusion: MR imaging is a sensitive imaging tool to evaluate tumor response as well as the presence or absence of adjacent parenchymal changes following radiosurgery. Loss of homogeneous or central contrast enhancement on Gd-enhanced MR images appeared to be a good prognostic sign for tumor response. Tumor shrinkage seems not to be dependent on time. In addition, most cases of radiation induced changes in normal brain parenchyma observed on T2-weighted images seem to be self limited.