Search

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a life-threatening. Differentiation pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) from pulmonary venous hypertension (PVH) is important due to distinct treatment protocols. Invasive right heart catheterization (RHC) remains the reference standard but noninvasive alternatives are needed., Purpose/hypothesis: To evaluate 4D Flow MRI-derived 3D vortex energetics in the left pulmonary artery (LPA) for distinguishing PAH from PVH., Study Type: Prospective case-control., Population/subjects: Fourteen PAH patients (11 female) and 18 PVH patients (9 female) diagnosed from RHC, 23 healthy controls (9 female)., Field Strength/sequence: 1.5 T; gradient recalled echo 4D flow and balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cardiac cine sequences., Assessment: LPA 3D vortex cores were identified using the lambda2 method. Peak vortex-contained kinetic energy (vortex-KE) and viscous energy loss (vortex-EL) were computed from 4D flow MRI. Left and right ventricular (LV, RV) stroke volume (LVSV, RVSV) and ejection fraction (LVEF, RVEF) were computed from bSSFP. In PH patients, mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWR) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were determined from RHC., Statistical Tests: Mann-Whitney U test for group comparisons, Spearman's rho for correlations, logistic regression for identifying predictors of PAH vs. PVH and develop models, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for model performance. Significance was set at P < 0.05., Results: PAH patients showed significantly lower vortex-KE (37.14 [14.68-78.52] vs. 76.48 [51.07-120.51]) and vortex-EL (9.93 [5.69-25.70] vs. 24.22 [12.20-32.01]) than PVH patients. The combined vortex-KE and LVEF model achieved an AUC of 0.89 for differentiating PAH from PVH. Vortex-EL showed significant negative correlations with mPAP (rho = -0.43), PCWP (rho = 0.37), PVR (rho = -0.64). In the PAH group, PVR was significantly negatively correlated with LPA vortex-KE (rho = -0.73) and vortex-EL (rho = -0.71), and vortex-KE significantly correlated with RVEF (rho = 0.69), RVSV, (rho = 0.70). In the PVH group, vortex-KE (rho = 0.52), vortex-EL significantly correlated with RVSV (rho = 0.58)., Data Conclusion: These preliminary findings suggest that 4D flow MRI-derived LPA vortex energetics have potential to noninvasively differentiate PAH from PVH and correlate with invasive hemodynamic parameters., Evidence Level: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.)

Background: Despite decades of accruing evidence supporting the clinical utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), adoption of CMR in routine cardiovascular practice remains limited in many regions of the world. Persistent use of long scan times of 60 min or more contributes to limited adoption, though techniques available on most scanners afford routine CMR examination within 30 min. Incorporating such techniques into standardize protocols can answer common clinical questions in daily practice, including those related to heart failure, cardiomyopathy, ventricular arrhythmia, ischemic heart disease, and non-ischemic myocardial injury. BODY: In this white paper, we describe CMR protocols of 30 min or shorter duration with routine techniques with or without stress perfusion, plus specific approaches in patient and scanner room preparation for efficiency. Minimum requirements for the scanner gradient system, coil hardware and pulse sequences are detailed. Recent advances such as quantitative myocardial mapping and other add-on acquisitions can be incorporated into the proposed protocols without significant extension of scan duration for most patients., Conclusion: Common questions in clinical cardiovascular practice can be answered in routine CMR protocols under 30 min; their incorporation warrants consideration to facilitate increased access to CMR worldwide., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of wall shear stress (WSS) as a predictor of ascending aorta (AAo) growth at 5 years or greater follow-up., Background: Aortic 4-dimensional flow cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can quantify regions exposed to high WSS, a known stimulus for arterial wall dysfunction. However, its association with longitudinal changes in aortic dilation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is unknown., Methods: This retrospective study identified 72 patients with BAV (age 45 ± 12 years) who underwent CMR for surveillance of aortic dilation at baseline and ≥5 years of follow-up. Four-dimensional flow CMR analysis included the calculation of WSS heat maps to compare regional WSS in individual patients with population averages of healthy age- and sex-matched subjects (database of 136 controls). The relative areas of the AAo and aorta (in %) exposed to elevated WSS (outside the 95% CI of healthy population averages) were quantified., Results: At a median follow-up duration of 6.0 years, the mean AAo growth rate was 0.24 ± 0.20 mm/y. The fraction of the AAo exposed to elevated WSS at baseline was increased for patients with higher growth rates (>0.24 mm/y, n = 32) compared with those with growth rates <0.24 mm/y (19.9% [IQR: 10.2%-25.5%] vs 5.7% [IQR: 1.5%-21.3%]; P = 0.008). Larger areas of elevated WSS in the AAo and entire aorta were associated with higher rates of AAo dilation >0.24 mm/y (odds ratio: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.05-2.17; P = 0.026 and odds ratio: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.01-3.15; P = 0.046, respectively)., Conclusions: The area of elevated AAo WSS as assessed by 4-dimensional flow CMR identified BAV patients with higher rates of aortic dilation and thus might determine which patients require closer follow-up., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Funding was provided by National Institutes of Health (grant nos. R01HL115828, R01HL133504, and F30HL145995). Dr Soulat received a grant support from the French College of Radiology Teachers and French Radiology Society. Additional support was provided by the Melman Bicuspid Aortic Valve Program, Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute. Dr Malaisrie has received honoraria and a research grant from Terumo Aortic. Dr McCarthy has received royalties and honoraria for speaking for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Markl has received research support from Siemens Healthineers; a research grant and consulting fees from Circle Cardiovascular Imaging; and a research grant from Cryolife Inc. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: J.C.C.: Bayer (Speaking/Teaching) (Advisory board), Guerbet, Siemens (Board Membership). M.M.: Circle Cardiovascular Imaging (Consulting), Cryolife Inc., Siemens Healthineers. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Background: Quantitative evaluation of mitral regurgitation (MR) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) relies on an indirect volumetric calculation. The aim of this study was to directly assess and quantify MR jets in patients with HCM using 4D flow CMR jet tracking in comparison to standard-of-care CMR indirect volumetric method., Methods: This retrospective study included patients with HCM undergoing 4D flow CMR. By the indirect volumetric method from CMR, MR volume was quantified as left ventricular stroke volume minus forward aortic volume. By 4D flow CMR direct jet tracking, multiplanar reformatted planes were positioned in the peak velocity of the MR jet during systole to calculate through-plane regurgitant flow. MR severity was collected for agreement analysis from a clinical echocardiograms performed within 1 month of CMR. Inter-method and inter-observer agreement were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and Cohen's kappa., Results: Thirty-seven patients with HCM were included. Direct jet tracking demonstrated good inter-method agreement of MR volume compared to the indirect volumetric method (ICC = 0.80, p = 0.004) and fair agreement of MR severity (kappa = 0.27, p = 0.03). Direct jet tracking showed higher agreement with echocardiography (kappa = 0.35, p = 0.04) than indirect volumetric method (kappa = 0.16, p = 0.35). Inter-observer reproducibility of indirect volumetric method components revealed the lowest reproducibility in end-systolic volume (ICC = 0.69, p = 0.15). Indirect volumetric method showed good agreement of MR volume (ICC = 0.80, p = 0.003) and fair agreement of MR severity (kappa = 0.38, p < 0.001). Direct jet tracking demonstrated (1) excellent inter-observer reproducibility of MR volume (ICC = 0.97, p < 0.001) and MR severity (kappa = 0.84, p < 0.001) and (2) excellent intra-observer reproducibility of MR volume (ICC = 0.98, p < 0.001) and MR severity (kappa = 0.88, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Quantifying MR and assessing MR severity by indirect volumetric method in HCM patients has limited inter-observer reproducibility. 4D flow CMR jet tracking is a potential alternative technique to directly quantify and assess MR severity with excellent inter- and intra-observer reproducibility and higher agreement with echocardiography in this population., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Rationale and Objectives: To develop a 16-fold accelerated real-time, free-breathing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) pulse sequence with compressed sensing reconstruction and test whether it is capable of producing clinically acceptable summed visual scores (SVS) and accurate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)., Materials and Methods: A 16-fold accelerated real-time cine CMR pulse sequence was developed using gradient echo readout, Cartesian k-space sampling, and compressed sensing. We scanned 13 CIED patients (mean age = 59 years; 9/4 males/females) using clinical standard, breath-hold cine and real-time, free-breathing cine. Two clinical readers performed a visual assessment of image quality in four categories (conspicuity of endocardial wall at end diastole, temporal fidelity of wall motion, any artifact level on the heart, noise) using a five-point Likert scale (1: worst; 3: clinically acceptable; 5: best). SVS was calculated as the sum of 4 individual scores, where 12 was defined as clinical acceptable. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare SVS, and the Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to evaluate the agreement of LVEF., Results: Median scan time was 3.7 times shorter for real-time (3.5 heartbeats per slice) than clinical standard (13 heartbeats per slice, excluding nonscanning time between successive breath-hold acquisitions). Median SVS was not significantly different between clinical standard (15.0) and real-time (14.5). The mean difference in LVEF was -2% (4.7% of mean), and the limits of agreement was 5.8% (13.5% of mean)., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the proposed real-time cine method produces clinically acceptable SVS and relatively accurate LVEF in CIED patients., (Copyright © 2020 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Coronary artery fistulas are uncommon but clinically important entities that may produce symptoms and significant complications such as angina, myocardial infarction, coronary artery aneurysm formation, and congestive heart failure. Multiple fistula types have been recognized, and classification uses factors such as etiology, coronary artery origin, and drainage site. Both invasive and noninvasive imaging play an important role in the management and treatment of these patients, and often times, more than one modality is necessary for comprehensive evaluation of coronary fistulas. Recent advances in both functional and anatomic imaging will likely also play a growing role in fistula evaluation. The purpose of this article is to review the classification, pathophysiology, clinical presentations, imaging findings, treatment, and future imaging directions of coronary artery fistulas., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

To noninvasively assess left atrial (LA) kinetic energy (KE) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients using 4D flow MRI and evaluate coupling associations with mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. Twenty-nine retrospectively identified patients with HCM underwent 4D flow MRI. MRI-estimated peak LVOT pressure gradient (∆P MRI ) was used to classify patients into non-obstructive and obstructive HCM. Time-resolved volumetric LA kinetic energy (KE LA ) was computed throughout systole. Average systolic (KE LA-avg ) and peak systolic (KE LA-peak ) KE LA were compared between non-obstructive and obstructive HCM groups, and associations to MR severity and LVOT ∆P MRI were tested.The study included 15 patients with non-obstructive HCM (58.6 [45.9, 65.2] years, 7 females) and 14 patients with obstructive HCM (51.9 [47.6, 62.6] years, 6 females). Obstructive HCM patients demonstrated significantly elevated instantaneous KE LA over all systolic time-points compared to non-obstructive HCM (P < 0.05). Obstructive HCM patients also demonstrated higher KE LA-avg (14.8 [10.6, 20.4] J/m 3 vs. 33.4 [23.9, 61.3] J/m 3 , P < 0.001) and KE LA-peak (22.1 [15.9, 28.7] J/m 3 vs. 57.2 [44.5, 121.4] J/m 3 , P < 0.001) than non-obstructive HCM. MR severity was significantly correlated with KE LA-avg (rho = 0.81, P < 0.001) and KE LA-peak (rho = 0.79, P < 0.001). LVOT ∆P MRI was strongly correlated with KE LA metrics in obstructive HCM (KE LA-avg : rho = 0.86, P < 0.001; KE LA-peak : rho = 0.85, P < 0.001).In HCM patients, left atrial kinetic energy, by 4D flow MRI, is associated with MR severity and the degree of LVOT obstruction., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: To develop and evaluate a flexible, Bloch-equation based framework for retrospective T 2 ∗ correction to the arterial input function (AIF) obtained with quantitative cardiac perfusion pulse sequences., Methods: Our framework initially calculates the gadolinium concentration [Gd] based on T 1 measurements alone. Next, T 2 ∗ is estimated from this initial calculation of [Gd] while assuming fast water exchange and using the literature native T 2 and static magnetic field variation (ΔB 0 ) values. Finally, the [Gd] is recalculated after performing T 2 ∗ correction to the Bloch equation signal model. Using this approach, we performed T 2 ∗ correction to historical phantom and in vivo, dual-imaging perfusion data sets from 3 different patient groups obtained using different pulse sequences and imaging parameters. Images were processed to quantify both the AIF and resting myocardial blood flow (MBF). We also performed a sensitivity analysis of our T 2 ∗ correction to ±20% variations in native T 2 and ΔB 0 ., Results: Compared with the ground truth [Gd] of phantom, the normalized root-means-square-error (NRMSE) in measured [Gd] was 5.1%, 1.3%, and 0.6% for uncorrected, our corrected, and Kellman's corrected, respectively. For in vivo data, both the peak AIF (7.0 ± 3.0 mM vs. 8.6 ± 7.1 mM, 7.2 ± 0.9 mM vs. 8.6 ± 1.7 mM, 7.7 ± 1.8 mM vs. 10.3 ± 5.1 mM, P < .001) and resting MBF (1.3 ± 0.1 mL/g/min vs. 1.1 ± 0.1 mL/g/min, 1.3 ± 0.1 mL/g/min vs. 1.1 ± 0.1 mL/g/min, 1.2 ± 0.1 mL/g/min vs. 0.9 ± 0.1 mL/g/min, P < .001) values were significantly different between uncorrected and corrected for all 3 patient groups. Both the peak AIF and resting MBF values varied by <5% over the said variations in native T 2 and ΔB 0 ., Conclusion: Our theoretical framework enables retrospective T 2 ∗ correction to the AIF obtained with dual-imaging, cardiac perfusion pulse sequences., (© 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.)

Objective: The 2019 Coronavirus (COVID-19) results in a wide range of clinical severity and there remains a need for prognostic tools which identify patients at risk of rapid deterioration and who require critical care. Chest radiography (CXR) is routinely obtained at admission of COVID-19 patients. However, little is known regarding correlates between CXR severity and time to intubation. We hypothesize that the degree of opacification on CXR at time of admission independently predicts need and time to intubation., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed COVID-19 patients who were admitted to an urban medical center during March 2020 that had a CXR performed on the day of admission. CXRs were divided into 12 lung zones and were assessed by two blinded thoracic radiologists. A COVID-19 opacification rating score (CORS) was generated by assigning one point for each lung zone in which an opacity was observed. Underlying comorbidities were abstracted and assessed for association., Results: One hundred forty patients were included in this study and 47 (34%) patients required intubation during the admission. Patients with CORS ≥ 6 demonstrated significantly higher rates of early intubation within 48 h of admission and during the hospital stay (ORs 24 h, 19.8, p < 0.001; 48 h, 28.1, p < 0.001; intubation during hospital stay, 6.1, p < 0.0001). There was no significant correlation between CORS ≥ 6 and age, sex, BMI, or any underlying cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities., Conclusions: CORS ≥ 6 at the time of admission predicts need for intubation, with significant increases in intubation at 24 and 48 h, independent of comorbidities., Key Points: • Chest radiography at the time of admission independently predicts time to intubation within 48 h and during the hospital stay in COVID-19 patients. • More opacities on chest radiography are associated with several fold increases in early mechanical ventilation among COVID-19 patients. • Chest radiography is useful in identifying COVID-19 patients whom may rapidly deteriorate and help inform clinical management as well as hospital bed and ventilation allocation.

Background: Four-dimensional (D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is limited by time-consuming and nonstandardized data analysis. We aimed to test the efficiency and interobserver reproducibility of a dedicated 4D flow MRI analysis workflow., Materials and Methods: Thirty retrospectively identified patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV, age=47.8±11.8 y, 9 male) and 30 healthy controls (age=48.8±12.5 y, 21 male) underwent Aortic 4D flow MRI using 1.5 and 3 T MRI systems. Two independent readers performed 4D flow analysis on a dedicated workstation including preprocessing, aorta segmentation, and placement of four 2D planes throughout the aorta for quantification of net flow, peak velocity, and regurgitant fraction. 3D flow visualization using streamlines was used to grade aortic valve outflow jets and extent of helical flow., Results: 4D flow analysis workflow time for both observers: 5.0±1.4 minutes per case (range=3 to 10 min). Valve outflow jets and flow derangement was visible in all 30 BAV patients (both observers). Net flow, peak velocity, and regurgitant fraction was significantly elevated in BAV patients compared with controls except for regurgitant fraction in plane 4 (91.1±29.7 vs. 62.6±19.6 mL/s, 37.1% difference; 121.7±49.7 vs. 90.9±26.4 cm/s, 28.9% difference; 9.3±10.1% vs. 2.0±3.4%, 128.0% difference, respectively; P<0.001). Excellent intraclass correlation coefficient agreement for net flow: 0.979, peak velocity: 0.931, and regurgitant fraction: 0.928., Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the potential of an efficient data analysis workflow to perform standardized 4D flow MRI processing in under 10 minutes and with good-to-excellent reproducibility for flow and velocity quantification in the thoracic aorta., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

During the peak phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, alterations of standard operating procedures were necessary for health systems to protect patients and healthcare workers and ensure access to vital hospital resources. As the peak phase passes, re-activation plans are required to safely manage increasing clinical volumes. In the context of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), re-activation objectives include continued performance of urgent CMR studies and resumption of CMR in patients with semi-urgent and elective indications in an environment that is safe for both patients and health care workers.

Pulmonary vascular assessment commonly relies on computed tomography angiography (CTA), but continued advances in magnetic resonance angiography have allowed pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography (pMRA) to become a reasonable alternative to CTA without exposing patients to ionizing radiation. pMRA allows the evaluation of pulmonary vascular anatomy, hemodynamic physiology, lung parenchymal perfusion, and (optionally) right and left ventricular function with a single examination. This article discusses pMRA techniques and artifacts; performance in commonly encountered pulmonary vascular diseases, specifically pulmonary embolism and pulmonary hypertension; and recent advances in both contrast-enhanced and noncontrast pMRA., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic cardiomyopathy with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. Patients can be asymptomatic or suffer major adverse events including sudden cardiac death, ventricular arrhythmias, and heart failure. Identification of individuals with HCM who are at risk for these complications remains challenging. While echocardiography remains the mainstay of diagnostic evaluation, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is an important adjunctive diagnostic modality with emerging applications for risk-stratification of adverse events in the HCM population. Although not included in current guidelines for HCM management, there is increasing evidence to support the use of CMR for routine prognostic assessment of HCM patients. In this review we discuss the use of CMR techniques, including late gadolinium enhancement, T1 mapping, and quantification of extracellular volume fraction, for the risk stratification of three major adverse events in HCM: sudden cardiac death, ventricular arrhythmias, and congestive heart failure.

Objectives: Recent studies with lung MRI (MRI) have shown high sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) for lung nodule detection and characterization relative to low-dose CT (LDCT). Using this background data, we sought to compare the potential screening performance of MRI vs. LDCT using a Markov model of lung cancer screening., Methods: We created a Markov cohort model of lung cancer screening which incorporated lung cancer incidence, progression, and mortality based on gender, age, and smoking burden. Sensitivity (Sn) and Sp for LDCT were taken from the MISCAN Lung Microsimulation and Sn/Sp for MRI was estimated from a published substudy of the German Lung Cancer Screening and Intervention Trial. Screening, work-up, and treatment costs were estimated from published data. Screening with MRI and LDCT was simulated for a cohort of male and female smokers (2 packs per day; 36 pack/years of smoking history) starting at age 60. We calculated the screening performance and cost-effectiveness of MRI screening and performed a sensitivity analysis on MRI Sn/Sp and cost., Results: There was no difference in life expectancy between MRI and LDCT screening (males 13.28 vs. 13.29 life-years; females 14.22 vs. 14.22 life-years). MRI had a favorable cost-effectiveness ratio of $258,169 in men and $403,888 in women driven by fewer false-positive screens. On sensitivity analysis, MRI remained cost effective at screening costs < $396 dollars and Sp > 81%., Conclusions: In this Markov model of lung cancer screening, MRI has a near-equivalent life expectancy benefit and has superior cost-effectiveness relative to LDCT., Key Points: • In this Markov model of lung cancer screening, there is no difference in mortality between yearly screening with MRI and low-dose CT. • Compared to low-dose CT, screening with MRI led to a reduction in false-positive studies from 26 to 2.8% in men and 26 to 2.6% in women. • Due to similar life-expectancy and reduced false-positive rate, we found a favorable cost-effectiveness ratio of $258,169 in men and $403,888 in women of MRI relative to low-dose CT.

Background: Children with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) are at risk for serious complications including aortic valve stenosis and aortic rupture. Most studies investigating biomarkers predictive of BAV complications are focused on adults., Objective: To investigate whether hemodynamic parameters change over time in children and young adults with BAV by comparing baseline and follow-up four-dimensional (4-D) flow MRI examinations., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively included 19 children and young adults with BAV who had serial 4-D flow MRI exams (mean difference in scan dates 1.8±1.0 [range, 0.6-3.4 years]). We compared aortic peak blood flow velocity, three-dimensional (3-D) wall shear stress, aortic root and ascending aortic (AAo) z-scores between baseline and follow-up exams. We generated systolic streamlines for all patients and visually compared their baseline and follow-up exams., Results: The only significant difference between baseline and follow-up exams occurred in AAo z-scores (3.12±2.62 vs. 3.59±2.76, P<0.05) indicating growth of the AAo out of proportion to somatic growth. There were no significant changes in either peak velocity or 3-D wall shear stress between baseline and follow-up exams. Ascending aortic peak velocity at baseline correlated with annual change in AAo z-score (r=0.58, P=0.009). Visual assessment revealed abnormal blood flow patterns, which were unique to each patient and remained stable between baseline and follow-up exams., Conclusion: In our pediatric and young adult BAV cohort, hemodynamic markers and systolic blood flow patterns remained stable over short-term follow-up despite significant AAo growth, suggesting minimal acute disease progression. Baseline AAo peak velocity was a predictor of AAo dilation and might help in determining pediatric patients with BAV who are at risk of increased AAo growth.

Aims: The left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) peak pressure gradient is an important haemodynamic descriptor in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM); however, secondary alterations in aortic blood flow have not been well described in these patients. Aortic flow derangement is not easily assessed by traditional imaging methods, but may provide unique characterization of this disease. In this study, we demonstrated how four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI can assess LVOT peak pressure gradients in HCM patients and also evaluated the ascending aorta (AAo) haemodynamic derangement associated with HCM., Methods and Results: Obstructive (n = 12) and non-obstructive (n = 18) HCM patients were included in the study along with 10 normal volunteers. 4D flow MRI was used to visualize three-dimensional (3D) blood flow patterns within the LVOT and AAo, which were graded for the presence of helical flow as a marker of flow derangement (absent = 0, mild/moderate = 1, and severe = 2). MRI-estimated pressure gradient (ΔPMRI) was calculated from the peak systolic 3D blood velocity profile within the LVOT. There was higher grade helical flow in obstructive HCM patients compared with non-obstructive patients (P = 0.04) and volunteers (P < 0.001). Non-obstructive patients also had higher helix grade than volunteers (P = 0.002). There was a significant correlation between helical grade and increasing ΔPMRI (rS = 0.69, P < 0.001). Systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the mitral valve was associated with both increasing helix grade (P < 0.001) and ΔPMRI (P = 0.006)., Conclusions: Ascending aorta flow derangement occurs in both obstructive and non-obstructive HCM patients and can be identified using 4D flow MRI. The degree of flow derangement correlates with LVOT gradient, SAM, and outflow tract geometry., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become an important tool for the clinical evaluation of patients with cardiovascular disease. Since its introduction in the late 1980s, 2-dimensional phase contrast MRI (2D PC-MRI) has become a routine part of standard-of-care cardiac MRI for the assessment of regional blood flow in the heart and great vessels. More recently, time-resolved PC-MRI with velocity encoding along all three flow directions and three-dimensional (3D) anatomic coverage (also termed '4D flow MRI') has been developed and applied for the evaluation of cardiovascular hemodynamics in multiple regions of the human body. 4D flow MRI allows for the comprehensive evaluation of complex blood flow patterns by 3D blood flow visualization and flexible retrospective quantification of flow parameters. Recent technical developments, including the utilization of advanced parallel imaging techniques such as k-t GRAPPA, have resulted in reasonable overall scan times, e.g., 8-12 minutes for 4D flow MRI of the aorta and 10-20 minutes for whole heart coverage. As a result, the application of 4D flow MRI in a clinical setting has become more feasible, as documented by an increased number of recent reports on the utility of the technique for the assessment of cardiac and vascular hemodynamics in patient studies. A number of studies have demonstrated the potential of 4D flow MRI to provide an improved assessment of hemodynamics which might aid in the diagnosis and therapeutic management of cardiovascular diseases. The purpose of this review is to describe the methods used for 4D flow MRI acquisition, post-processing and data analysis. In addition, the article provides an overview of the clinical applications of 4D flow MRI and includes a review of applications in the heart, thoracic aorta and hepatic system.