Search

Rationale & Objective: Lumasiran reduces urinary and plasma oxalate (POx) in patients with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) and relatively preserved kidney function. ILLUMINATE-C evaluates the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of lumasiran in patients with PH1 and advanced kidney disease., Study Design: Phase 3, open-label, single-arm trial., Setting & Participants: Multinational study; enrolled patients with PH1 of all ages, estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (if age ≥12 months) or increased serum creatinine level (if age <12 months), and POx ≥20 μmol/L at screening, including patients with or without systemic oxalosis., Intervention: Lumasiran administered subcutaneously; 3 monthly doses followed by monthly or quarterly weight-based dosing., Outcome: Primary end point: percent change in POx from baseline to month 6 (cohort A; not receiving hemodialysis at enrollment) and percent change in predialysis POx from baseline to month 6 (cohort B; receiving hemodialysis at enrollment). Pharmacodynamic secondary end points: percent change in POx area under the curve between dialysis sessions (cohort B only); absolute change in POx; percent and absolute change in spot urinary oxalate-creatinine ratio; and 24-hour urinary oxalate adjusted for body surface area., Results: All patients (N = 21; 43% female; 76% White) completed the 6-month primary analysis period. Median age at consent was 8 (range, 0-59) years. For the primary end point, least-squares mean reductions in POx were 33.3% (95% CI, -15.2% to 81.8%) in cohort A (n = 6) and 42.4% (95% CI, 34.2%-50.7%) in cohort B (n = 15). Improvements were also observed in all pharmacodynamic secondary end points. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. No patient discontinued treatment or withdrew from the study. The most commonly reported lumasiran-related adverse events were injection-site reactions, all of which were mild and transient., Limitations: Single-arm study without placebo control., Conclusions: Lumasiran resulted in substantial reductions in POx with acceptable safety in patients with PH1 who have advanced kidney disease, supporting its efficacy and safety in this patient population., Funding: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals., Trial Registration: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT04152200 and at EudraCT with study number 2019-001346-17., Plain-Language Summary: Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is a rare genetic disease characterized by excessive hepatic oxalate production that frequently causes kidney failure. Lumasiran is an RNA interference therapeutic that is administered subcutaneously for the treatment of PH1. Lumasiran has been shown to reduce oxalate levels in the urine and plasma of patients with PH1 who have relatively preserved kidney function. In the ILLUMINATE-C study, the efficacy and safety of lumasiran were evaluated in patients with PH1 and advanced kidney disease, including a cohort of patients undergoing hemodialysis. During the 6-month primary analysis period, lumasiran resulted in substantial reductions in plasma oxalate with acceptable safety in patients with PH1 complicated by advanced kidney disease., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The finding of white matter damage on brain magnetic resonance imaging may correspond to a wide variety of etiologies. The differential diagnosis may be particularly difficultin immunocompromised patients with a specific autoimmune disease or who are receiving medications after a solid-organ transplant. Herein, we describe the case of a 22-year-old woman who developed serious neurological complications after an acute rejection of a kidney graft that she had received a few months previous to treat a systemic lupus erythematosus-related nephritis.We discuss the possible hypotheses underlying the development of acute leukoencephalopathy in this setting.

Introduction: The efficacy of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NR; Paxlovid, Pfizer, New York, NY) to decrease the risk of progression to severe COVID-19 in high-risk patients has been demonstrated. However, evidence in infected kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is lacking. Moreover, NR has significant and potentially harmful interactions with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs)., Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we included all KTRs treated with NR from April 28 to June 3, 2022. A standard management strategy of CNI dose adaptation (discontinuation of tacrolimus 12 hours before the start of NR and administration of 20% of the cyclosporine dose) and laboratory follow-up was applied., Results: A total of 14 patients were included. Compared with day-0 (day before NR initiation), day-7 plasma creatinine concentrations and SARS-CoV-2 viral loads were similar ( P  = 0.866) and decreased ( P  = 0.002), respectively. CNI trough concentrations at the end of the treatment were satisfactory, nonetheless, with high individual variability. After a median follow-up time of 34 days, no death or viral pneumonia were observed. Nevertheless, 2 patients experienced early SARS-CoV-2 infection relapses (at day-10 and day-21) associated with an increase in SARS-CoV-2 viral loads., Conclusion: NR can be used in KTRs but requires a strict protocol of drug adaptation. We observed 2 cases of early relapse after NR treatment that need further investigations., (© 2022 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Rationale & Objective: Neutralizing monoclonal antibody treatments have shown promising preliminary results in kidney transplant recipients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. However, their efficacy in kidney transplant recipients infected with the Omicron variant has not been reported yet., Study Design: Single-center retrospective study., Setting & Participants: We included all consecutive kidney transplant recipients treated with monoclonal antibodies for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections (positive polymerase chain reaction on nasopharyngeal swab) between June 10, 2021, and January 14, 2022. Forty-seven kidney transplant recipients were included. All patients had symptoms evolving for ≤7 days and no oxygen therapy need at monoclonal antibody infusion., Results: Symptoms at diagnosis were mainly cough (n = 25; 53%) and fever (n = 15; 32%). Eighty-three percent of the cohort (n = 39) had been vaccinated with at least 2 doses before infection, of whom 30 (77%) had demonstrated a vaccine-induced humoral response. They were treated with either casirivimab-imdevimab (n = 16; 34%) or sotrovimab (n = 31; 66%) a median of 2 days (range, 0-6 days) after the onset of symptoms. Except for 1 mild allergic reaction during casirivimab-imdevimab infusion, no side effects were reported. The median viral loads at admission (day 0) and 7 days after monoclonal antibody infusion were 2,110,027 copies/mL (range, 1,000-153,798,962 copies/mL) and 1,000 copies/mL (range, 0-10,000,000 copies/mL), respectively. Genotypes were available for 22 kidney transplant recipients (47%). Omicron, Delta, and Gamma variants were identified in 13 (59%), 8 (36%), and 1 (5%) patients, respectively. In kidney transplant recipients infected with the Omicron variant, the median viral loads at day 0 and day 7 were 752,789 copies/mL (range, 4,000-12,859,300 copies/mL) and 1,353 copies/mL (range, 0-1,211,163 copies/mL), respectively. 2 kidney transplant recipients required hospitalization immediately after sotrovimab perfusion for oxygen therapy that was weaned in 3 days, allowing patients' discharge. None were admitted to the intensive care unit or died., Limitations: Small sample size, no control group., Conclusions: Neutralizing monoclonal antibody therapy is associated with positive outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with mild coronavirus disease 2019, including those infected with the Omicron variant., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: The lack of space, as an indication for a native unilateral nephrectomy for positioning a future kidney graft in the absence of other autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease-related symptoms, remains controversial., Aim: To evaluate the surgical comorbidity and the impact on graft survival of an associated ipsilateral native nephrectomy during isolated kidney transplantation in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease., Methods: One hundred and fifty-four kidney transplantations performed between January 2007 and January 2019 of which 77 without (kidney transplant alone (KTA) group) and 77 with associated ipsilateral nephrectomy (KTIN group), were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics and surgical variables were analyzed and their respective impact on surgical comorbidity and graft survival., Results: Creation of space for future graft positioning was the main reason ( n = 74, 96.1%) for associated ipsilateral nephrectomy. No significant difference in surgical comorbidity (lymphocele, wound infection, incisional hernia, wound hematoma, urinary infection, need for blood transfusion, hospitalization stay, Dindo Clavien classification and readmission rate) was observed between the two study groups. The incidence of primary nonfunction and delayed graft function was comparable in both groups [0% and 2.6% ( P = 0.497) and 9.1% and 16.9% ( P = 0.230), respectively, in the KTA and KTIN group]. The 1- and 5-year graft survival were 94.8% and 90.3%, and 100% and 93.8%, respectively, in the KTA and KTIN group ( P = 0.774). The 1- and 5-year patient survival were 96.1% and 92.9%, and 100% and 100%, respectively, in the KTA and KTIN group ( P = 0.168)., Conclusion: Simultaneous ipsilateral native nephrectomy to create space for graft positioning during kidney transplantation in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease does not negatively impact surgical comorbidity and short- and long-term graft survival., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors have no conflict of interest related to the manuscript., (©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pregnancies in women who underwent kidney transplants are at high risk compared with the general population., Methods: In this study, we aimed to retrospectively assess the obstetrical complications, delivery outcomes, and impact of pregnancy on kidney allograft function in a single-center cohort of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). We provide data regarding the long-term evolution of children., Results: Thirty-two KTRs underwent a total of 57 pregnancies between 1994 and 2010. Fourteen pregnancies (24 %) did not survive caused by miscarriages (n = 9), stillborn (n = 1), ectopic pregnancies (n = 2), and medical abortion (n = 2). Live birth occurred in 76% of pregnancies. Delivery was by cesarean in 66%. The mean gestational age was 30.45 ± 11.3 weeks and 65% of newborns were premature. A low birth weight <2500g was noted in 46%. Obstetric complications were de novo hypertension in 4%, pre-eclampsia in 9%, and gestational diabetes in 2%. The 5- and 10-year post-delivery death-censored graft loss rates were 3.1% and 12.5%, respectively. Data on 21 children were collected via a self-questionnaire. After a median follow-up time of 17 years, they appeared in good medical and psychological health. None of them suffered from chronic disease (especially uronephrological condition) or was taking chronic medication., Conclusions: Long-term evolution of children born to women who underwent kidney transplants seems favorable. Pregnancies in KTRs are successful in two-thirds of cases but are at increased risk of prematurity, delivery by cesarean, and low birth weight., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may have an increased risk of mortality compared with the general population and hemodialysis patients. As these patients are immunosuppressed, it might seem obvious to attribute this excess mortality to the impaired immunity induced by immunosuppression. In line with this reasoning is the low immune response, both cellular and humoral, that KTRs mount in response to the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine; however, acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with coronavirus disease 2019 is triggered by a state of inflammation and cytokine release syndrome that lead to pulmonary damage and increased mortality. In that context, immunosuppressive treatment dampening the immune response could, in theory, be potentially beneficial. This review aims at analyzing the current knowledge on the impact of immunosuppressive treatment on mortality in SARS-CoV-2-infected KTRs, the optimal management of immunosuppression in the coronavirus disease 2019 era, and the vaccine response and management in immunosuppressed KTRs., Competing Interests: The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Purpose: Hypertension is a common cardiovascular co-morbidity after kidney transplantation and contributes to shortened graft and patient survival outcomes. However, by contrast with adherence to immunosuppressive drugs, adherence to antihypertensive treatment in kidney transplant recipients has been seldom explored. The aim of the current study was to assess adherence to antihypertensive drugs in kidney transplant recipients from the Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and to look for demographic and clinical characteristics associated with drug adherence., Methods: Demographic and clinical data were collected from medical files in a standardised case report form. Blood pressure was measured in the sitting position after 5 min rest, using validated oscillometric devices. Drug adherence was assessed by drug dosage in urine using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry., Results: Our analysis included 53 kidney transplants recipients (75% of men, mean age: 57.2 ± 12.6 years, time since kidney transplantation: 9.5 ± 7.3 years, blood pressure: 130 ± 16/78 ± 11 mmHg on 2.1 ± 1.1 antihypertensive drugs). The proportion of patients showing full drug adherence, partial drug adherence, and total non-adherence to antihypertensive drugs was 79% ( N  = 42), 15% ( N  = 8), and 6% ( N  = 3), respectively. Adherent patients did not differ from less or non- adherers in any of the analysed characteristics., Conclusion: The proportion of patients adhering to antihypertensive drug treatment among kidney transplant recipients appears similar to that reported for immunosuppressive drugs in renal transplanted patients (∼70%), but much higher than that observed in patients with drug-resistant hypertension (30-40%). Our results need further confirmation in a large, multicenter, prospective cohort.

Introduction: Recurrence of anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) glomerulonephritis in the kidney graft is a rare event, described in limited reports. The aim of this study was to evaluate, in a large cohort of patients with long follow-up, the risk of recurrence of anti-GBM disease, the risk factors associated with clinical recurrence, and the long-term patient and graft survival., Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were patients with anti-GBM glomerulonephritis who underwent transplantation of a kidney between 1977 and 2015. Exclusion criteria were systemic vasculitis, lupus erythematosus, and cryoglobulinemia. Recurrence was defined as reappearance of clinical signs of glomerulonephritis along with histological signs of proliferative glomerulonephritis and linear IgG staining on kidney biopsy, with or without anti-GBM antibodies., Results: A total of 53 patients were included. Recurrence of anti-GBM glomerulonephritis in a first kidney transplant occurred in only 1 patient 5 years after transplantation (a prevalence rate of 1.9%) in the context of cessation of immunosuppressive drugs, and resulted in graft loss due to recurrence. Linear IgG staining on kidney biopsy in the absence of histological signs of proliferative glomerulonephritis was observed in 4 patients, in the context of cellular rejection. Patient survival was 100%, 94%, and 89% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Death-censored first-graft survival rates were 88%, 83%, and 79% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively., Conclusion: The recurrence rate of anti-GBM glomerulonephritis after transplantation is very low but is associated with graft loss. The long-term patient and graft survival rates are excellent., (© 2021 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The urinary chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 are promising noninvasive diagnostic markers of acute rejection (AR) in kidney recipients, but their levels might be confounded by urinary tract infection (UTI) and BK virus (BKV) reactivation. Multiparametric model development and validation addressed these confounding factors in a training set of 391 samples, optimizing the diagnostic performance of urinary chemokines. CXCL9/creatinine increased in UTI and BKV viremia with or without nephropathy (BKVN) (no UTI/leukocyturia/UTI: -0.10/1.61/2.09, P = .0001 and no BKV/viremia/BKVN: -0.10/1.90/2.29, P < .001) as well as CXCL10/creatinine (1.17/2.09/1.98, P < .0001 and 1.13/2.21/2.51, P < .001, respectively). An optimized 8-parameter model (recipient age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate, donor specific antibodies, UTI, BKV blood viral load, CXCL9, and CXCL10) diagnosed AR with high accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80-0.89) and remained highly accurate at the time of screening (AUC: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.48-1) or indication biopsies (AUC: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.81-0.90) and within the first year (AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.80-0.91) or later (AUC: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84-0.96), achieving AR diagnosis with an AUC of 0.85 and 0.92 (P < .0001) in 2 external validation cohorts. Decision curve analyses demonstrated the clinical utility of the model. Considering confounding factors rather than excluding them, we optimized a noninvasive multiparametric diagnostic model for AR of kidney allografts with unprecedented accuracy., (© 2020 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by the functional defect of alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase that results in the overproduction of oxalate. It can be devastating especially for kidneys, leading to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) during the first 2 to 3 decades of life in most patients. Consequently, many PH1 patients need kidney transplantation. However, because PH1 is caused by a liver enzyme deficiency, the only cure of the metabolic defect is liver transplantation. Thus, current transplant strategies to treat PH1 patients with ESRD include dual liver-kidney transplantation. However, the morbidity and mortality associated with liver transplantation make these strategies far from optimal. Fortunately, a therapeutic revolution is looming. Indeed, innovative drugs are being currently tested in clinical trials, and preliminary data show impressive efficacy to reduce the hepatic overproduction of oxalate. Hopefully, with these therapies, liver transplantation will no longer be necessary. However, some patients with progressing renal disease or those who will be diagnosed with PH1 at an advanced stage of chronic kidney disease will ultimately need kidney transplantation. Here we review the current knowledge on this subject and discuss the future of kidney transplant management in PH1 patients in the era of novel therapies., (© 2020 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Rationale & Objective: The world is facing a global pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk for viral infections, the impact of their chronic immunosuppressed status on the risk for acquiring coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and disease severity is unknown., Study Design: All cases of COVID-19 infection in our cohort of kidney transplant recipients were prospectively monitored. Clinical features, management, and outcomes were recorded. A standard strategy of immunosuppression minimization was applied: discontinue the antimetabolite drug and reduce trough levels of calcineurin or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. Unless contraindicated, hydroxychloroquine was administered only to hospitalized patients., Setting & Participants: 22 COVID-19 infections were diagnosed in our cohort of 1,200 kidney transplant recipients., Results: Most common initial symptoms included fever, cough, or dyspnea. 18 (82%) patients required hospitalization. Of those patients, 3 had everolimus-based immunosuppression. Computed tomography of the chest at admission (performed in 15 patients) showed mild (n = 3), moderate (n = 8), extensive (n = 1), severe (n = 2), and critical (n = 1) involvement. Immunosuppression reduction was initiated in all patients. Hydroxychloroquine was administered to 15 patients. 11 patients required supplemental oxygen; 2 of them were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with mechanical ventilation. After a median of 10 days, 13 kidney transplant recipients were discharged, 2 were hospitalized in non-ICU units, 1 was in the ICU, and 2 patients had died., Limitations: Small sample size and short follow-up., Conclusions: The clinical presentation of COVID-19 infection was similar to that reported in the general population. A standard strategy of immunosuppression minimization and treatment was applied, with 11% mortality among kidney transplant recipients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection., (© 2020 The Authors.)

Purpose of Review: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) provide impressive response rates among immunocompetent patients with various solid tumors. So far, organ transplant recipients have been excluded from clinical studies due to the putative risk of allograft rejection however 48 cases of liver and renal transplant patients treated with CPI were already described in literature., Recent Findings: Here we discuss 19 cases of liver and 29 cases of renal transplant patients who received CPI for advanced cancer. Disease control rate [stable disease, complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) together] was 35% (21% for liver and 45% for kidney transplant patients). Graft rejection was seen in 37% of liver and 45% and kidney transplant patients. Significantly, our analysis shows that an 'ideal' response occurs in 21% of all patients (antitumor response accompanied with durable graft tolerance)., Summary: We believe that transplant patients can be treated with CPI in a controlled setting and for well informed patients. To obtain a durable antitumor immune response while avoiding rejection, to be able to adjust immunosuppression and to have the opportunity to develop biomarkers for tumor response and transplant rejection, these patients should be treated according to a clinical care path or a prospective clinical trial.